Search

PURPOSE Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has proven survival benefits for patients with invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, yet its role for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains undefined. We conducted a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial of NAC with gemcitabine and split-dose cisplatin (GC) for patients with high-risk UTUC before extirpative surgery to evaluate response, survival, and tolerability. METHODS Eligible patients with defined criteria for high-risk localized UTUC received four cycles of split-dose GC before surgical resection and lymph node dissection. The primary study end point was rate of pathologic response (defined as < ypT2N0). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety and tolerability. RESULTS Among 57 patients evaluated, 36 (63%) demonstrated pathologic response (95% CI, 49 to 76). A complete pathologic response (ypT0N0) was noted in 11 patients (19%). Fifty-one patients (89%) tolerated at least three complete cycles of split-dose GC, 27 patients (47%) tolerated four complete cycles, and all patients proceeded to surgery. With a median follow up of 3.1 years, 2- and 5-year PFS rates were 89% (95% CI, 81 to 98) and 72% (95% CI, 59 to 87), while 2- and 5-year OS rates were 93% (95% CI, 86 to 100) and 79% (95% CI, 67 to 94), respectively. Pathologic complete and partial responses were associated with improved PFS and OS compared with nonresponders (≥ ypT2N any; 2-year PFS 100% and 95% v 76%, P < .001; 2-year OS 100% and 100% v 80%, P < .001). CONCLUSION NAC with split-dose GC for high-risk UTUC is a well-tolerated, effective therapy demonstrating evidence of pathologic response that is associated with favorable survival outcomes. Given that these survival outcomes are superior to historical series, these data support the use of NAC as a standard of care for high-risk UTUC, and split-dose GC is a viable option for NAC.

Bladder cancer is an aggressive and lethal disease. Even when presenting as localized muscle-invasive disease, the 5-year survival rate is about 70%, and the recurrence rate after radical cystectomy is approximately 50%. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has the potential to downstage the primary tumor and treat micrometastases, leading to a decrease in recurrence rates and an increase in cure rates. There is level 1 evidence in favor of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy. However, data from clinical trials evaluating NAC for patients undergoing bladder-sparing treatments are less robust, so this strategy remains controversial. The response to NAC is prognostic and patients with favorable pathological response have better overall survival. Strategies to select patients based on molecular biomarkers have the potential to guide treatment decisions and even de-intensify treatment, avoiding local treatment for those with complete responses to systemic therapy. This review outlines the current literature on the use of NAC in the context of bladder preservation for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, highlights neoadjuvant studies in patients ineligible for cisplatin-based NAC, and discusses novel bladder-preservation strategies, including multimodality combinations and biomarker-driven studies of definitive chemotherapy.

Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is one of the most common malignancies. Patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk disease can be treated with intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, a vaccine against tuberculosis. However, many of these patients will experience tumor recurrence, despite appropriate treatment. 1 The standard of care in these patients is radical cystectomy (RC) with urinary diversion. 2 Patients diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) have traditionally faced 2 main treatment options: RC and urinary diversion, as in Bacillus Calmette-Guerin-unresponsive Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, or alternatively, trimodal therapy comprising maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor plus chemoradiation. 3 For patients with MIBC and clinical (c)T2-T4a, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) preceding RC is supported by Level 1 evidence with a modest 5-year overall survival benefit of 5% with cisplatin-based regimens. 4-9 A number of factors preclude MIBC patients from standard treatment options. For example, patients with serious comorbidities might be unable to tolerate general anesthesia, while others might be unwilling to adapt to the lifestyle changes after RC. 10-12 Likewise, patients with extensive carcinoma in situ or poor bladder function might not be optimal candidates for trimodal therapy or be prepared for the ongoing risk that salvage RC might be ultimately required. Reasons for the underuse of NAC range from the fear of delaying potentially curative surgery in nonresponders to patient ineligibility to cisplatin-based NAC. 13,14 Despite best efforts, in both surgical and bladder-sparing approaches, the 5-year overall survival in treated patients with MIBC is only 35% to 50%. 3,15 Strategies to improve overall prognosis as well as to reduce the indications of RC are desperately needed. Trial results have demonstrated the unprecedented ability of immune-checkpoint inhibitors to induce durable remissions in some patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. 16-20 Furthermore, immune-checkpoint inhibitors have shown to be better tolerated than traditional chemotherapy. 16 These successful results have spearheaded the research on these agents in earlier curative settings, with the shared goal of improving overall outcomes, and potentially avoid surgery in patients who show complete response (pT0). Strategies to enhance the immune response by combining immunotherapy with immune sensitizers such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy or radiation are on the rise.

Cancer immunotherapy has significantly improved patient survival. Yet, half of patients do not respond to immunotherapy. Gut microbiomes have been linked to clinical responsiveness of melanoma patients on immunotherapies; however, different taxa have been associated with response status with implicated taxa inconsistent between studies. We used a tumor-agnostic approach to find common gut microbiome features of response among immunotherapy patients with different advanced stage cancers. A combined meta-analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequencing data from our mixed tumor cohort and three published immunotherapy gut microbiome datasets from different melanoma patient cohorts found certain gut bacterial taxa correlated with immunotherapy response status regardless of tumor type. Using multivariate

Novel immune checkpoint inhibitors hold promise for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Cooperation between urologists and other multidisciplinary bladder cancer specialists can surmount the challenges involved in using these agents in bladder-sparing approaches. This strategy could deliver a new era of comprehensive evaluation and multimodal treatment for this patient population.

Supplementary Table S8. Patient characteristics of bladder specimens used for figure 4B, 4C, and 4G.

Supplementary Data from Cabozantinib plus Nivolumab Phase I Expansion Study in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Refractory to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

Purpose:This study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of cabozantinib plus nivolumab (CaboNivo) in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) that progressed on checkpoint inhibition (CPI).Patients and Methods:A phase I expansion cohort of patients with mUC who received prior CPI was treated with cabozantinib 40 mg/day and nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary goal was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v.1.1. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), overall survival (OS), safety, and tolerability.Results:Twenty-nine out of 30 patients enrolled were evaluable for efficacy. Median follow-up was 22.2 months. Most patients (86.7%) received prior chemotherapy and all patients received prior CPI (median seven cycles). ORR was 16.0%, with one complete response and three partial responses (PR). Among 4 responders, 2 were primary refractory, 1 had a PR, and 1 had stable disease on prior CPI. Median DoR was 33.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.7–33.5], median PFS was 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.1–5.5), and median OS was 10.4 months (95% CI, 5.8–19.5). CaboNivo decreased immunosuppressive subsets such as regulatory T cells (Tregs) and increased potential antitumor immune subsets such as nonclassical monocytes and effector T cells. A lower percentage of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (M-MDSC) and polymorphonuclear MDSCs, lower CTLA-4 and TIM-3 expression on Tregs, and higher effector CD4+ T cells at baseline were associated with better PFS and/or OS.Conclusions:CaboNivo was clinically active, well tolerated, and favorably modulated peripheral blood immune subsets in patients with mUC refractory to CPI.

Supplementary Figure S6. Survival analysis of individual downregulated genes showed poor prognosis associated with CPT1B and PIGB in the Lindgren and Sjodahl cohorts; PLA2G4A in the Lindgren cohort; PIGV in the Kim and Sjodahl cohorts; ATP8B1 in the Kim and Sjodahl cohorts; INPP5D in the Kim and Sjodahl cohorts; PIGZ in the Kim and Sjodahl cohorts; PLCD3 in the Sjodahl cohort; and PLA2G10 in the Kim cohort.

Purpose:Circulating tumor cells (CTC) are under investigation as a minimally invasive liquid biopsy that may improve risk stratification and treatment selection. CTCs uniquely allow for digital pathology of individual malignant cell morphology and marker expression. We compared CTC features and T-cell counts with survival endpoints in a cohort of patients with metastatic genitourinary cancer treated with combination immunotherapy.Experimental Design:Markers evaluated included pan-CK/CD45/PD-L1/DAPI for CTCs and CD4/CD8/Ki-67/DAPI for T cells. ANOVA was used to compare CTC burden and T-cell populations across timepoints. Differences in survival and disease progression were evaluated using the maximum log-rank test.Results:From December 2016 to January 2019, 183 samples from 81 patients were tested. CTCs were found in 75% of patients at baseline. CTC burden was associated with shorter overall survival (OS) at baseline (P = 0.022), but not on-therapy. Five morphologic subtypes were detected, and the presence of two specific subtypes with unique cellular features at baseline and on-therapy was associated with worse OS (0.9–2.3 vs. 28.2 months; P < 0.0001–0.013). Increasing CTC heterogeneity on-therapy had a trend toward worse OS (P = 0.045). PD-L1+ CTCs on-therapy were associated with worse OS (P < 0.01, cycle 2). Low baseline and on-therapy CD4/CD8 counts were also associated with poor OS and response category.Conclusions:Shorter survival may be associated with high CTC counts at baseline, presence of specific CTC morphologic subtypes, PD-L1+ CTCs, and low �4/8 T cells in patients with metastatic genitourinary cancer. A future study is warranted to validate the prognostic utility of CTC heterogeneity and detection of specific CTC morphologies.

Supplementary Data

Supplemental legend

Association between CCNE1 variants and bladder cancer

Supplementary Figure 1: Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) for CCNE1 SNPs rs8102137 and rs7257330. Supplementary Figure 2: Alignment of cyclin E protein isoforms - WT1, WT2 and ES and ET. Supplementary Figure 3: Functional analysis of cyclin E isoforms.Supplementary Table 1: Description of sub-studies included in NCI-GWAS1 and GWAS2 of bladder cancer. Supplementary Table 2: Characteristics of bladder tissue samples used for mRNA expression analysis. Supplementary Table 3: PCR primers, genotyping and gene expression assays, EMSA probes and antibodies. Supplementary Table 4: Bladder cancer stage and grade information for patients in the combined GWAS1+2 set. Supplementary Table 6: Association with bladder cancer risk with mutual adjustment for CCNE1 variants. Supplementary Table 7: Association with bladder cancer risk for CCNE1 variants previously associated with other cancers and for two non-synonymous coding variants. Supplementary Table 8: Association between cyclin E protein expression (IHC scores), bladder cancer patient characteristics and CCNE1 variants.

Purpose: This study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of cabozantinib plus nivolumab (CaboNivo) in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) that progressed on checkpoint inhibition (CPI). Patients and Methods: A phase I expansion cohort of patients with mUC who received prior CPI was treated with cabozantinib 40 mg/day and nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary goal was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v.1.1. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), overall survival (OS), safety, and tolerability. Results: Twenty-nine out of 30 patients enrolled were evaluable for efficacy. Median follow-up was 22.2 months. Most patients (86.7%) received prior chemotherapy and all patients received prior CPI (median seven cycles). ORR was 16.0%, with one complete response and three partial responses (PR). Among 4 responders, 2 were primary refractory, 1 had a PR, and 1 had stable disease on prior CPI. Median DoR was 33.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.7–33.5], median PFS was 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.1–5.5), and median OS was 10.4 months (95% CI, 5.8–19.5). CaboNivo decreased immunosuppressive subsets such as regulatory T cells (Tregs) and increased potential antitumor immune subsets such as nonclassical monocytes and effector T cells. A lower percentage of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (M-MDSC) and polymorphonuclear MDSCs, lower CTLA-4 and TIM-3 expression on Tregs, and higher effector CD4+ T cells at baseline were associated with better PFS and/or OS. Conclusions: CaboNivo was clinically active, well tolerated, and favorably modulated peripheral blood immune subsets in patients with mUC refractory to CPI.

The success of the use of novel therapies in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma has contributed to growing interest in evaluating these therapies at earlier stages of the disease. However, trials evaluating these therapies in the neoadjuvant setting must have clearly defined study elements and appropriately selected end points to ensure the applicability of the trial and enable interpretation of the study results. To advance the development of rational trial design, a public workshop jointly sponsored by the US Food and Drug Administration and the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network convened in August 2019. Clinicians, clinical trialists, radiologists, biostatisticians, patients, advocates and other stakeholders discussed key elements and end points when designing trials of neoadjuvant therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), identifying opportunities to refine eligibility, design and end points for neoadjuvant trials in MIBC. Although pathological complete response (pCR) is already being used as a co-primary end point, both individual-level and trial-level surrogacy for time-to-event end points, such as event-free survival or overall survival, remain incompletely characterized in MIBC. Additionally, use of pCR is limited by heterogeneity in pathological evaluation and the fact that the magnitude of pCR improvement that might translate into a meaningful clinical benefit remains unclear. Given existing knowledge gaps, capture of highly granular patient-related, tumour-related and treatment-related characteristics in the current generation of neoadjuvant MIBC trials will be critical to informing the design of future trials.

The phase III CheckMate 9ER trial originally included a nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus cabozantinib triplet arm, which was discontinued early due to the evolving treatment landscape for first-line advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). We report an exploratory analysis of patients randomised to the triplet regimen before enrolment discontinuation.Patients with clear-cell aRCC received nivolumab (3 mg/kg) plus ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) Q3W for four cycles with once-daily cabozantinib (40 mg), then nivolumab (240 mg) Q2W plus once-daily cabozantinib (40 mg). CheckMate 9ER primary (progression-free survival [PFS] by blinded independent central review [BICR]) and key secondary (overall survival [OS], objective response rate [ORR] by BICR, and safety) endpoints were applied, along with investigator-assessed PFS and ORR.Fifty patients were randomised to the triplet regimen. After a median follow-up of 39.1 months (range, 33.4-44.5), median PFS (95% CI) was 9.9 (5.7-16.8) months by BICR and 13.9 (7.3-24.7) months by investigator; median OS (95% CI) was 37.0 (31.8-not estimable) months. ORR (95% CI) was 44.0% (30.0-58.7; complete response, 8.0%) by BICR and 48.0% (33.7-62.6; all partial responses) by investigator. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 84.0%, most commonly alanine aminotransferase increased (20.0%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (16.0%), and hepatotoxicity (16.0%). Grade 3-4 hepatic immune-mediated AEs occurred in 40.0%. There were no grade 5 TRAEs.These results suggest that the nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus cabozantinib triplet combination has clinical activity in patients with previously untreated aRCC, although monitoring of overlapping toxicities will be important in future studies of this regimen.gov registration: NCT03141177.

We present a case of a 69-year-old male patient diagnosed with high grade (T1 HG) urothelial carcinoma of the bladder who progressed rapidly towards muscle invasive disease and eventually death despite neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy. We postulate that this may be due to a deleterious underlying somatic gene mutation. Molecular pathologic data obtained on the initial, non-muscle invasive tumor and the final cystectomy specimen, revealed the same TP53 mutation (p.Arg110Pro) in both specimens with a variant allele frequency of 44%. The tumor was tested for 50 common gene mutations in urothelial carcinoma and no other identifiable DNA repair mutations were found, suggesting that this specific TP53 aberration, one that has never been reported in the bladder cancer literature, could be particularly deleterious. Knowing that bladder cancer cell lines that lack TP53 are more resistant to cisplatin and because the tumor lacked any other DNA mutation, this patient may have been a candidate for upfront surgery without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In addition to histological analysis of the tumor, early molecular and cytogenetic characterization of resected tissue is essential in predicting progression and eventual prognosis of the disease based on identifiable gene mutations. Further comparative prospective studies are required to clarify the importance of molecular heterogeneity and subtyping in bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate multidisciplinary female representation at urologic oncology conferences, we reviewed speakership trends at contemporary Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) and American Society of Clinical Oncology Genitourinary Symposium (GU-ASCO) annual meetings. METHODS: Meeting programs from SUO and GU-ASCO from 2015 to 2019 were analyzed. Biographical information was determined by querying institutional websites and social/professional media platforms. Statistical analyses were performed to assess for differences and relationships between male and female authorship based on gender, specialty, professional, and educational factors. RESULTS: We identified 1102 speakers at genitourinary oncology conferences. Overall, 222 (20%) were female. There was no significant difference between female speakership rates at SUO and GU-ASCO. The overall proportion of female speakers increased over time, but not when analyzing each individual subspecialty conference separately. Several professional and educational differences were noted between genders. Female speakers were more likely to be medical oncologists (P

The efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus cabozantinib as compared with those of sunitinib in the treatment of previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma are not known.In this phase 3, randomized, open-label trial, we randomly assigned adults with previously untreated clear-cell, advanced renal-cell carcinoma to receive either nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks) plus cabozantinib (40 mg once daily) or sunitinib (50 mg once daily for 4 weeks of each 6-week cycle). The primary end point was progression-free survival, as determined by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included overall survival, objective response as determined by independent review, and safety. Health-related quality of life was an exploratory end point.Overall, 651 patients were assigned to receive nivolumab plus cabozantinib (323 patients) or sunitinib (328 patients). At a median follow-up of 18.1 months for overall survival, the median progression-free survival was 16.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.5 to 24.9) with nivolumab plus cabozantinib and 8.3 months (95% CI, 7.0 to 9.7) with sunitinib (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.64; P0.001). The probability of overall survival at 12 months was 85.7% (95% CI, 81.3 to 89.1) with nivolumab plus cabozantinib and 75.6% (95% CI, 70.5 to 80.0) with sunitinib (hazard ratio for death, 0.60; 98.89% CI, 0.40 to 0.89; P = 0.001). An objective response occurred in 55.7% of the patients receiving nivolumab plus cabozantinib and in 27.1% of those receiving sunitinib (P0.001). Efficacy benefits with nivolumab plus cabozantinib were consistent across subgroups. Adverse events of any cause of grade 3 or higher occurred in 75.3% of the 320 patients receiving nivolumab plus cabozantinib and in 70.6% of the 320 patients receiving sunitinib. Overall, 19.7% of the patients in the combination group discontinued at least one of the trial drugs owing to adverse events, and 5.6% discontinued both. Patients reported better health-related quality of life with nivolumab plus cabozantinib than with sunitinib.Nivolumab plus cabozantinib had significant benefits over sunitinib with respect to progression-free survival, overall survival, and likelihood of response in patients with previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and others; CheckMate 9ER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03141177.).

Purpose: Circulating tumor cells (CTC) are under investigation as a minimally invasive liquid biopsy that may improve risk stratification and treatment selection. CTCs uniquely allow for digital pathology of individual malignant cell morphology and marker expression. We compared CTC features and T-cell counts with survival endpoints in a cohort of patients with metastatic genitourinary cancer treated with combination immunotherapy. Experimental Design: Markers evaluated included pan-CK/CD45/PD-L1/DAPI for CTCs and CD4/CD8/Ki-67/DAPI for T cells. ANOVA was used to compare CTC burden and T-cell populations across timepoints. Differences in survival and disease progression were evaluated using the maximum log-rank test. Results: From December 2016 to January 2019, 183 samples from 81 patients were tested. CTCs were found in 75% of patients at baseline. CTC burden was associated with shorter overall survival (OS) at baseline (P = 0.022), but not on-therapy. Five morphologic subtypes were detected, and the presence of two specific subtypes with unique cellular features at baseline and on-therapy was associated with worse OS (0.9–2.3 vs. 28.2 months; P < 0.0001–0.013). Increasing CTC heterogeneity on-therapy had a trend toward worse OS (P = 0.045). PD-L1+ CTCs on-therapy were associated with worse OS (P < 0.01, cycle 2). Low baseline and on-therapy CD4/CD8 counts were also associated with poor OS and response category. Conclusions: Shorter survival may be associated with high CTC counts at baseline, presence of specific CTC morphologic subtypes, PD-L1+ CTCs, and low %CD4/8 T cells in patients with metastatic genitourinary cancer. A future study is warranted to validate the prognostic utility of CTC heterogeneity and detection of specific CTC morphologies.

Background: Precision oncology is gradually advancing into mainstream clinical practice, demonstrating significant survival benefits. However, eligibility and response rates remain limited in many cases, calling for better predictive biomarkers. Methods: We present ENLIGHT, a transcriptomics-based computational approach that identifies clinically relevant genetic interactions and uses them to predict a patient’s response to a variety of therapies in multiple cancer types, importantly, without training on previous treatment response data. Consequently, in addition to its ability to predict patients' response to approved and well-studied therapies, ENLIGHT can predict the response to new treatments in early development, even before clinical data has accumulated. Accordingly, we study ENLIGHT in two translationally relevant scenarios: Personalized Oncology (PO), aimed at prioritizing approved treatments to a given patient, and Clinical Trial Design (CTD), selecting the subset of most likely responders in a patient cohort. Results: Evaluating ENLIGHT’s performance on 21 blinded clinical trial datasets spanning 11 indications and 15 different drugs in the PO setting, we show that it can effectively predict a patient’s treatment response across multiple therapies and cancer types, with an overall odds ratio of 2.59 (p=3.41e-8), and a 36% increase in response rate over the baseline (p=3.30e-13). Its prediction accuracy is better than other state-of-the-art transcriptomics-based signatures. Unlike most signatures that are prognostic or provide insights for only very few, specific treatments, ENLIGHT provides matching scores to a broad range of treatments. Quite strikingly, its performance is comparable to that of supervised predictors developed for specific indications and drugs. In combination with the IFN-γ signature, ENLIGHT achieves an odds ratio larger than 4 in predicting response to immune checkpoint therapy. In the CTD scenario, our results show that by excluding non-responders ENLIGHT can enhance clinical trial success for immunotherapies and other monoclonal antibodies, achieving > 90% of the response rate attainable under an optimal exclusion strategy. Conclusion: ENLIGHT is a powerful transcriptomics-based precision oncology pipeline developed by Pangea Biomed that broadly predicts response to both extant and novel targeted and immune therapies, going beyond context-specific biomarkers. Citation Format: Gal Dinstag, Eldad D. Shulman, Efrat Elis, Doreen S. Ben-Zvi, Omer Tirosh, Eden Maimon, Isaac Meilijson, Emmanuel Elalouf, Boris Temkin, Philipp Vitkovsky, Eyal Schiff, Danh-Tai Hoang, Sanju Sinha, Nishanth Ulhas Nair, Joo Sang-Lee, Alejandro A. Schäffer, Ze'ev Ronai, Dejan Juric, Andrea B. Apolo, William L. Dahut, Stanley Lipkowitz, Raanan Berger, Razelle Kurzrock, Antonios Papanicolau-Sengos, Fatima Karzai, Mark R. Gilbert, Kenneth Aldape, Padma S. Rajagopal, Tuvik Beker, Eytan Ruppin, Ranit Aharonov. Prediction of patient response to targeted and immunotherapies from the tumor transcriptome in a wide set of indications and clinical trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 957.

The role of adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma is rapidly evolving. To date, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved sunitinib and pembrolizumab in the adjuvant setting for renal cell carcinoma and nivolumab for urothelial carcinoma based on disease-free survival benefit. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration held a joint workshop with the National Cancer Institute and the Society of Urologic Oncology in 2017 to harmonize design elements, including eligibility and radiologic assessments across adjuvant trials in renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. Considerations from the discussion at these workshops led the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to draft guidances to help inform subsequent adjuvant trial design for renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. Patient-centered decision-making is crucial when determining therapeutic choices in the adjuvant setting; utility functions can be used to help quantify each patient’s goals, values, and risk/benefit trade-offs to ensure that the decision regarding adjuvant therapy is informed by their preferences and the evolving outcomes data.

BackgroundPrecision oncology is gradually advancing into mainstream clinical practice, demonstrating significant survival benefits. However, eligibility and response rates remain limited in many cases, calling for better predictive biomarkers.MethodsWe present ENLIGHT, a transcriptomics-based computational approach that identifies clinically relevant genetic interactions and uses them to predict a patient’s response to a variety of therapies in multiple cancer types, without training on previous treatment response data. We study ENLIGHT in two translationally oriented scenarios:Personalized Oncology (PO), aimed at prioritizing treatments for a single patient, andClinical Trial Design (CTD), selecting the most likely responders in a patient cohort.FindingsEvaluating ENLIGHT’s performance on 21 blinded clinical trial datasets in the PO setting, we show that it can effectively predict a patient’s treatment response across multiple therapies and cancer types. Its prediction accuracy is better than previously published transcriptomics-based signatures and is comparable to that of supervised predictors developed for specific indications and drugs. In combination with the IFN-γsignature, ENLIGHT achieves an odds ratio larger than 4 in predicting response to immune checkpoint therapy. In the CTD scenario, ENLIGHT can potentially enhance clinical trial success for immunotherapies and other monoclonal antibodies by excluding non-responders, while overall achieving more than 90% of the response rate attainable under an optimal exclusion strategy.ConclusionENLIGHT demonstrably enhances the ability to predict therapeutic response across multiple cancer types from the bulk tumor transcriptome.FundingThis research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program, NIH and by the Israeli Innovation Authority.

PURPOSE We assessed the safety and efficacy of cabozantinib and nivolumab (CaboNivo) and CaboNivo plus ipilimumab (CaboNivoIpi) in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and other genitourinary (GU) malignances. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received escalating doses of CaboNivo or CaboNivoIpi. The primary objective was to establish a recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary objectives included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Fifty-four patients were enrolled at eight dose levels with a median follow-up time of 44.6 months; data cutoff was January 20, 2020. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 75% and 87% of patients treated with CaboNivo and CaboNivoIpi, respectively, and included fatigue (17% and 10%, respectively), diarrhea (4% and 7%, respectively), and hypertension (21% and 10%, respectively); grade 3 or 4 immune-related AEs included hepatitis (0% and 13%, respectively) and colitis (0% and 7%, respectively). The RP2D was cabozantinib 40 mg/d plus nivolumab 3 mg/kg for CaboNivo and cabozantinib 40 mg/d, nivolumab 3 mg/kg, and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg for CaboNivoIpi. ORR was 30.6% (95% CI, 20.0% to 47.5%) for all patients and 38.5% (95% CI, 13.9% to 68.4%) for patients with mUC. Median DoR was 21.0 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 24.1 months) for all patients and not reached for patients with mUC. Median PFS was 5.1 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 6.9 months) for all patients and 12.8 months (95% CI, 1.8 to 24.1 months) for patients with mUC. Median OS was 12.6 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 18.8 months) for all patients and 25.4 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 41.6 months) for patients with mUC. CONCLUSION CaboNivo and CaboNivoIpi demonstrated manageable toxicities with durable responses and encouraging survival in patients with mUC and other GU tumors. Multiple phase II and III trials are ongoing for these combinations.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to evaluate the utility of ferumoxytol-enhanced MR lymphography (MRL) in detection of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) in patients with prostate, bladder, and kidney cancer. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. This phase 2 single-institution study enrolled patients with confirmed prostate (arm 1), bladder (arm 2), and kidney (arm 3) cancer and evidence of suspected LN involvement. Participants underwent ferumoxytol-enhanced MRL 24 and 48 hours after IV injection of 7.5 mg Fe/kg of ferumoxytol. A retrospective quantitative analysis was performed to determine the optimal timing for ferumoxytol-enhanced MRL using percentage change in normalized signal intensity (SI) from baseline to 24 and 48 hours after injection, which were estimated using the linear mixed-effects model in which time (24 vs 48 hours), diseases status, and time and disease status interaction were the fixed-effects independent variables. Differences in normalized SI values between subgroups of lesions were estimated by forming fixed-effects contrasts and tested by the Wald test. RESULTS. Thirty -nine patients (n = 30, arm 1; n = 6, arm 2; n = 3, arm 3) (median age, 65 years) with 145 LNs (metastatic, n = 100; benign, n = 45) were included. LN-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ferumoxytol-enhanced MRL was 98.0%, 64.4%, 86.0%, and 93.5%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of ferumoxytol-enhanced MRL did not vary by LN size. Metastatic LNs showed a significantly higher percentage decrease of normalized SI on MRL at 24 hours after ferumoxytol injection than at 48 hours after ferumoxytol injection (p = 0.023), whereas the normalized SI values for nonmetastatic LNs were similar at both imaging time points (p = 0.260). CONCLUSION. Ferumoxytol-enhanced MRL shows high sensitivity in the detection of metastatic LNs in genitourinary cancers independent of LN size. The SI difference between benign and malignant LNs on ferumoxytol-enhanced MRL appears similar 24 and 48 hours after ferumoxytol injection, suggesting that imaging can be performed safely within 1 or 2 days of injection. Although ferumoxytol-enhanced MRL can be useful in settings without an available targeted PET agent, issues of iron overload and repeatability of ferumoxytol-en-hanced MRL remain concerns for this method.

608 Background: Prior studies investigated determinants of anti–PD-L1 ± anti-angiogenic response in aRCC. The mechanisms underlying response to first-line anti–PD-1 + VEGF-targeted therapy (anti-VEGF) remain largely unknown. In this exploratory post hoc analysis we conducted an analysis of anti–PD-1 (N) + anti-VEGF (C) v S by assessing potential predictive biomarkers for efficacy in CheckMate 9ER. Analyzed biomarkers included CD8 T-cell frequency (% of total tumor cells, CD8%), CD8 topology, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), and 7 gene expression signatures (GES). Methods: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by tumor PD-L1 expression (< 1% or ≥ 1%), CD8% (low, medium, high by tertiles), and CD8 topology phenotype (cold, excluded, inflamed), and assessed for association using Kaplan–Meier (KM) methods with log-rank test (PD-L1 and CD8), and Cox proportional hazard (Cox PH) models (CD8) (to avoid arbitrary or biased categorization of continuous-valued predictor variables, a potential limitation of KM analyses). Pre-ranked GSEA was performed to assess enrichment for hallmark gene sets using all genes ranked by interaction effect estimates derived using Cox PH regression. Seven GES (Angio, Myeloid, Teff, TIS, Interferon-γ, EMT8, Javelin), including several previously found to be predictive of anti-PD-L1 ± anti-VEGF outcomes, were assessed for association with PFS within treatment arms. Results: At 44 mo median follow-up, median PFS and OS were improved with N+C v S regardless of PD-L1 status. PD-L1 < 1% v ≥ 1% was associated with longer median PFS in the S arm only ( P = 0.00045). In KM analyses, higher CD8% was associated with improvements in PFS with N+C, but not S. Of the 410 patients (pts) in the CD8 topology analysis, the predominant CD8 phenotype was inflamed (46.8%), then cold (40.5%) and excluded (12.7%). CD8 topology supported an association between the inflamed phenotype and improved survival outcomes with N+C v S (PFS, P < 0.0001; OS, P = 0.00097). However, these associations were not confirmed in Cox PH models. Common hallmark gene sets with positive (p) or negative (n) enrichment (with false discovery rate < 0.05) in genes associated with longer PFS and OS with N+C v S included oxidative phosphorylation, hypoxia, adipogenesis, P53 pathway (p), and E2F targets (n). Pts receiving N+C had longer median PFS with high Angio GES v medium and low Angio GES ( P = 0.019). However, all 7 GES tested, including Angio GES, were not predictive for N+C outcomes in Cox PH models. Conclusions: In this exploratory post hoc analysis, biomarkers previously found to be predictive of anti-PD-L1 ± anti-VEGF outcomes, including established GES, were not predictive of efficacy with anti-PD-1 + anti-VEGF (N+C) using Cox PH models. This suggests that key determinants of response to anti–PD-1 v anti–PD-L1 therapies may differ. Clinical trial information: NCT03141177 .

467 Background: Neuroendocrine, small cell, or large cell carcinoma originating from the urothelium (uro-NE/SCC/LCC) is rare. Outcomes for metastatic disease are dismal. Treatment is extrapolated from small cell lung cancer, for which immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have modest activity. Preliminary activity has been reported with ICI for uro-NE. We aimed to compare real-world progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between ICI-containing and non-ICI-containing regimens in the first line (1L) metastatic setting for uro-NE/SCC/LCC. Methods: We performed a retrospective study at 11 cancer centers. Patients (pts) who received systemic therapy (2011-2021) for biopsy confirmed metastatic uro-NE/SCC/LCC were included. Pts with metastasis within 6 months of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) (n=16) were excluded from 1L analyses. Results: 102 pts with metastatic uro-NE/SCC/LCC were evaluable. 17 (16.7%) had NE histology, 81 (79.4%) SCC, and 4 (3.9%) LCC. NE/SCC/LCC was mixed with urothelial histology in 19 (18.6%). Primary tumors were most often in the bladder (84.3%, n=86), less frequently upper tract (11.8%, n=12) or urethra (3.9%, n=4). 42 pts (41.2%) were previously treated for localized disease, the rest were de novo metastatic (n=60, 58.8%). Pts who received an ICI in any line (n=61) had significantly longer OS (p=0.038) than pts that never received an ICI (n=41). As shown in the table, in the 1L, ICI-containing regimens (n=33) resulted in significantly longer PFS, but not OS or ORR compared to non-ICI regimens (n=53). Subdividing 1L regimens into ICI without CT (n=14), CT without ICI (n=53), or ICI + CT (n=19), both PFS and OS were significantly different with similar ORR. ICI w/o CT had the longest median PFS and OS with an ORR 57.1% comparable to CT regimens. Of 61 pts that received ICI in any line, 14 (23.0%) had an immune-related adverse event of any grade; 11 (18.0%) received steroids. Conclusions: This is the largest ever report of ICI for metastatic uro-NE/SCC/LCC. ICIs were associated with improved outcomes with expected added toxicity. Further prospective investigation of ICI regimens is warranted. [Table: see text]

492 Background: The development and selection of treatments for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) have historically focused on clinical outcomes while stakeholder preferences are often considered less frequently. To facilitate the consideration of various perspectives, this study explored factors that may influence preferences of patients, caregivers, and physicians around aspects of la/mUC treatments. Methods: Interview guides elicited perspectives on disease impact (symptoms, health-related quality of life [HRQOL], survival), therapy goals and unmet needs and were conducted with patients with la/mUC, their caregivers, and medical oncologists in the US. Qualitative semi-structured data were collected on symptoms, treatment expectations, and hypothetical treatments that required trade-offs between overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer pain, and the risk of severe adverse events (SAEs). Participant’s willingness to accept AEs was also explored. Results: Thirty participants, including: 10 patients (mean age 58 years; 60% female, ineligible for cisplatin: 50%), 10 caregivers (mean age 50 years; 70% female), and 10 physicians (mean 17 years treating la/mUC; 30% female) were interviewed. The most frequently reported symptom at diagnosis was pain (patients 90%, caregivers 90%) and blood in urine (physicians 100%). All three groups reported emotional impacts with depression/sadness the most common. Patients (n=7) and caregivers (n=7) relied on physicians for decision-making but felt that alternative treatments were not discussed (patients: n=5; caregivers: n=3). All groups were willing to accept some level of risk of experiencing an AE, but the accepted risk of SAEs varied (patients: 0-50% risk of SAEs; caregivers: 5-100%; physicians: 3-30%). Physicians focused treatment discussions on AEs (n=8), and overall response rate (ORR; n=6), and rarely discussed survival (n=3). All three groups described PFS and treatment response as very or most relevant to them. In the hypothetical choice tasks, all would make trade-offs between OS, PFS, pain reduction and risk of SAEs; consistent with an approach that weighs benefits and risks in treatment selection. Conclusions: Patients likely may benefit from shared, informed decision-making to identify the most appropriate treatment option for them based on clinical outcomes, AEs, HRQOL, and pain control. All groups were willing to make benefit-risk trade-offs but preferences were heterogeneous. While this study included a relatively small number of patients, planned research informed by these results will expand and further identify which treatment attributes are most important to patients.

5 Background: Management options for patients (pts) with advanced (locally advanced or metastatic) PeCa are limited. The GSRGT assembled an international cohort of pts with advanced PeCa treated with ICI to evaluate toxicity and clinical outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively collected data on pts with advanced PeCa receiving ≥1 cycle of ICI between 2015-2022 at 18 medical centers in the US, Europe, and Asia. Immune-related adverse events (irAE) were graded per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Objective response rate (ORR) was determined by the clinical investigator per RECIST 1.1 criteria, whenever feasible. Results: Among 72 pts with advanced PeCa treated with ICI, 24 (33%) were Hispanic and 7 (10%) were Black. 60 (83%) pts had metastases while the remainder had locally advanced disease. The median age was 64 (inter-quartile range (IQR): 54,70) years and 48 (67%) had ECOG performance status ≥1. Most pts (n=60, 83%) were treated in the ≥2nd line setting and received pembrolizumab (n=23), nivolumab (n=15), cemiplimab (n=15), nivolumab and ipilimumab (n=7), or other anti-PD1/L1-based therapies (n=12). Among 37 pts with available data on HPV status, 24 (65%) were HPV+. 3 (4%) pts were HIV+. irAE of any grade occurred in 18 (25%) pts, 7 (10%) were grade ≥3, 7 (10%) required steroids, 6 (9%) required hospitalization, and 8 (11%) led to treatment discontinuation. The median OS and 24-month OS and median PFS and 24-month PFS were 9.4 (95%CI: 6.8, 12.8) months and 19.3% (95%CI: 9.2, 32.1) and 2.8 (95%CI: 2.1, 3.9) months and 11.2 % (95%CI: 4.9, 20.2), respectively. Among 66 pts evaluable for response, ORR was 7/66 (11%) (2 with complete response, 5 with partial response), and 16 (24%) pts had stable disease for a disease control rate of 35%. The median duration of response was 7.9 (IQR: 3, not reached) months. Conclusions: In the largest retrospective cohort of ICI-treated advanced PeCa, ICI showed no new safety signals, however, overall anti-tumor activity was limited. Future translational studies are needed to identify pts that are more likely to derive clinical benefit from ICI.

In the CheckMate 9ER trial, patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who received first-line nivolumab plus cabozantinib had significantly better progression-free survival compared with those given sunitinib. In this study, we aimed to describe the patient-reported outcome (PRO) results from CheckMate 9ER.In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial done in 125 cancer centres, urology centres, and hospitals across 18 countries, patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma with a clear-cell component, a Karnofsky performance status of 70% or more, and available tumour tissue were randomly assigned (1:1) via interactive response technology to nivolumab 240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks plus oral cabozantinib 40 mg per day, or oral sunitinib 50 mg per day monotherapy for 4 weeks in 6-week cycles. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival was reported previously. PROs were analysed as prespecified exploratory endpoints at common timepoints (at baseline and every 6 weeks) until week 115. Disease-related symptoms were evaluated using the 19-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI-19), and global health status was assessed with the three-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) visual analogue scale (VAS) and UK utility index. PRO analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. Change from baseline was assessed using mixed-model repeated measures. A time-to-deterioration analysis was done for first and confirmed deterioration events. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03141177, and is closed to recruitment.Between Sept 11, 2017, and May 14, 2019, 323 patients were randomly assigned to nivolumab plus cabozantinib and 328 to sunitinib. Median follow-up was 23·5 months (IQR 21·0-26·5). At baseline, patients in both groups reported low symptom burden (FKSI-19 disease-related symptoms version 1 mean scores at baseline were 30·24 [SD 5·19] for the nivolumab plus cabozantinib group and 30·06 [5·03] for the sunitinib group). Change from baseline in PRO scores indicated that nivolumab plus cabozantinib was associated with more favourable outcomes versus sunitinib (treatment difference 2·38 [95% CI 1·20-3·56], nominal p0·0001, effect size 0·33 [95% CI 0·17-0·50] for FKSI-19 total score; 1·33 [0·84-1·83], nominal p0·0001, 0·45 [0·28-0·61] for FKSI-19 disease-related symptoms version 1; 3·48 [1·58-5·39], nominal p=0·0004, 0·30 [0·14-0·47] for EQ-5D-3L VAS; and 0·04 [0·01-0·07], nominal p=0·0036, 0·25 [0·08-0·41] for EQ-5D-3L UK utility index), reaching significance at most timepoints. Nivolumab plus cabozantinib was associated with decreased risk of clinically meaningful deterioration for FKSI-19 total score compared with sunitinib (first deterioration event hazard ratio 0·70 [95% CI 0·56-0·86], nominal p=0·0007; confirmed deterioration event 0·63 [0·50-0·80], nominal p=0·0001).PROs were maintained or improved with nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib. Compared with sunitinib, nivolumab plus cabozantinib significantly delayed time to deterioration of patient-reported outcome scores. These results suggest a benefit for nivolumab plus cabozantinib compared with sunitinib in the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.Bristol Myers Squibb.

We report a case of nivolumab‐induced delayed‐onset aseptic meningitis and a case of limbic encephalitis and peripheral nerve palsy with toxicity relapse 6 months after initial presentation. The atypical presentations contribute to our knowledge of these rare events and reinforce the necessity for vigilant monitoring and a multidisciplinary treatment approach.

Purpose We evaluated the prognostic value of 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) PET/CT in patients with urological malignancies treated with cabozantinib and nivolumab with or without ipilimumab. Methods We prospectively recruited patients with advanced urological malignancies into a phase I trial of cabozantinib plus nivolumab with or without ipilimumab. NaF PET/CT scans were performed pre- and 8 weeks post-treatment. We measured the total volume of fluoride avid bone (FTV) using a standardized uptake value (SUV) threshold of 10. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to predict the overall survival (OS) of patients in terms of SUVmax, FTV, total lesion fluoride (TLF) uptake at baseline and 8 weeks post-treatment, and percent change in FTV and TLF. Result Of 111 patients who underwent NaF PET/CT, 30 had bone metastases at baseline. Four of the 30 patients survived for the duration of the study period. OS ranged from 0.23 to 34 months (m) (median 6.0 m). The baseline FTV of all 30 patients ranged from 9.6 to 1570 ml (median 439 ml). The FTV 8 weeks post-treatment was 56–6296 ml (median 448 ml) from 19 available patients. Patients with higher TLF at baseline had shorter OS than patients with lower TLF (3.4 vs 14 m; p = 0.022). Patients with higher SUVmax at follow-up had shorter OS than patients with lower SUVmax (5.6 vs 24 m; p = 0.010). However, FTV and TLF 8 weeks post-treatment did not show a significant difference between groups (5.6 vs 17 m; p = 0.49), and the percent changes in FTV (12 vs 14 m; p = 0.49) and TLF (5.6 vs 17 m; p = 0.54) also were not significant. Conclusion Higher TLF at baseline and higher SUVmax at follow-up NaF PET/CT corresponded with shorter survival in patients with bone metastases from urological malignancies who underwent treatment. NaF PET/CT may be a useful predictor of OS in this population.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective in treating a variety of malignancies, including metastatic bladder cancer. A generally accepted hypothesis suggests that immune checkpoint inhibitors induce tumor regressions by reactivating a population of endogenous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) that recognize cancer neoantigens. Although previous studies have identified neoantigen-reactive TILs from several types of cancer, no study to date has shown whether neoantigen-reactive TILs can be found in bladder tumors. To address this, we generated TIL cultures from patients with primary bladder cancer and tested their ability to recognize tumor-specific mutations. We found that CD4+ TILs from one patient recognized mutated C-terminal binding protein 1 in an MHC class II–restricted manner. This finding suggests that neoantigen-reactive TILs reside in bladder cancer, which may help explain the effectiveness of immune checkpoint blockade in this disease and also provides a rationale for the future use of adoptive T cell therapy targeting neoantigens in bladder cancer.

PURPOSE: To report the clinical features, severity, and management of ocular immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in the setting of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for metastatic malignancies. METHODS: Retrospective chart review at three tertiary ophthalmology clinics. Electronic medical records were reviewed between 2000 and 2017 for patients with new ocular symptoms while undergoing checkpoint inhibition therapy. RESULTS: Eleven patients were identified. Ocular irAEs ranged from keratoconjunctivitis sicca to Vogt-Koyanagi -Harada-like findings. Average timing of irAEs from starting checkpoint inhibitor therapy was 15.7 weeks. Ocular inflammation was successfully controlled with corticosteroids in most cases, however three patients discontinue treatment as a result of ocular inflammation with decreased visual acuity, two discontinued due to progression of metastatic disease, and one discontinued due to severe systemic irAEs. CONCLUSION: We found a wide spectrum of ocular irAEs associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. In most cases, ocular AEs did not limit ongoing cancer treatment.

Renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) is one of the most aggressive renal cell carcinomas. It predominantly afflicts young adults and adolescents with sickle cell trait and other sickle hemoglobinopathies, and is refractory to targeted and antiangiogenic therapies used in patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Platinum-based cytotoxic chemotherapy is the mainstay for RMC treatment. On the basis of recent advances in the diagnosis, management, and clinical trial development for RMC, a panel of experts met in October 2017 and developed updated consensus recommendations to inform clinicians, researchers, and patients. Because RMC often aggressively recurs while patients are still recovering from nephrectomy, upfront chemotherapy should be considered for most patients, including those with localized disease. After safety and dosing information has been established in adults, phase II and III trials enrolling patients with RMC should allow patients aged 12 years and older to be accrued. Patients with the very rare unclassified renal cell carcinoma with medullary phenotype variant should be included in RMC trials. Medical providers should be aware that RMC can afflict subjects of all races, and not only those of African descent, and that the presence of sickle cell trait, or of other sickle hemoglobinopathies, can affect drug responses and toxicity.

Background African Americans (AAs) experience a disproportionally high rate of bladder cancer (BLCA) deaths even though their incidence rates are lower than those of other patient groups. Using a metabolomics approach, this study investigated how AA BLCA may differ molecularly from European Americans (EAs) BLCA, and it examined serum samples from patients with BLCA with the aim of identifying druggable metabolic pathways in AA patients. Methods Targeted metabolomics was applied to measure more than 300 metabolites in serum samples from 2 independent cohorts of EA and AA patients with BLCA and healthy EA and AA controls via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, and this was followed by the identification of altered metabolic pathways with a focus on AA BLCA. A subset of the differential metabolites was validated via absolute quantification with the Biocrates AbsoluteIDQ p180 kit. The clinical significance of the findings was further examined in The Cancer Genomic Atlas BLCA data set. Results Fifty-three metabolites, mainly related to amino acid, lipid, and nucleotide metabolism, were identified that showed significant differences in abundance between AA and EA BLCA. For example, the levels of taurine, glutamine, glutamate, aspartate, and serine were elevated in serum samples from AA patients versus EA patients. By mapping these metabolites to genes, this study identified significant relations with regulators of metabolism such as malic enzyme 3, prolyl 3-hydroxylase 2, and lysine demethylase 2A that predicted patient survival exclusively in AA patients with BLCA. Conclusions This metabolic profile of serum samples might be used to assess risk progression in AA BLCA. These first-in-field findings describe metabolic alterations in AA BLCA and emphasize a potential biological basis for BLCA health disparities.

e13554 Background: Quantitative 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging metrics have been shown to be prognostic in metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) patients. However, previous studies have shown conflicting results in which metrics could be prognostic. This study investigates if current methods from literature generalize to external datasets and explores which combination of features are necessary to for survival models to generalize across datasets. Methods: Imaging and progression-free survival (PFS) data from 118 patients with mPC from four separate prospective clinical trials were gathered retrospectively. Patients received 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging at baseline and at follow-up, between eight and thirteen weeks. TRAQinform IQ technology (AIQ Solutions) was used to identify, segment, and track individual lesions from baseline to follow-up. Eighty-four imaging features were extracted from each patient and sorted into baseline, follow-up, response, patient-level (no inter-lesion comparison), and intrapatient heterogeneity (comparisons between lesions). The data was split into two training and testing sets, 44 patients from one study and 73 patients from the remaining 3 studies. As they can utilize large number of inputs without overfitting, random survival forest (RSF) models were chosen to evaluate performance of feature sets in predicting PFS. Different combinations of features were used as inputs to RSF models to compare single timepoint features with response features and patient-level features with intrapatient heterogeneity features. The performance of the RSF models, together with other methods identified in literature, were evaluated in each dataset using Kaplan-Meier analysis for categorical variables and the c-index for continuous variables. Results: No patient-level imaging features highlighted by literature displayed significant association to PFS across all four clinical trials (c-index < 0.62 in at least one dataset). Other criteria from literature did not generalize across all datasets (P > 0.05). The RSF model trained with all features had high c-indices in all four datasets (range: 0.66-0.80). RSF models built with response features (min: 0.63) performed better on average than models built with features obtained from single timepoints (min: 0.55). Patient-level features (min: 0.56) were not sufficient in all testing scenarios as compared to intrapatient heterogeneity features (min: 0.63). Conclusions: The candidate imaging biomarkers from previous 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging studies of mPC patients did not generalize across all datasets. Incorporating response and heterogeneity features with single-timepoint and patient-level features resulted in RSF prediction models which were generalizable across all datasets. Use of such models hold promise for improving outcome prediction in mPC patients.

e13556 Background: Precision oncology is gradually advancing into mainstream clinical practice. Despite the significant recent growth in the number of approved biomarkers for immune and targeted therapies, demonstrating significant survival benefits, eligibility and response rates remain limited in many cases, calling for better predictive biomarkers. Methods: We developed ENLIGHT - a transcriptomics-based computational platform that identifies and utilizes clinically relevant genetic interactions (GIs) to predict a patient’s response to cancer treatments. ENLIGHT markedly extends and improves upon SELECT, a previous GI-based framework for obtaining transcriptomics-based response biomarkers. In this study, we focus on three key translational aspects: (i) the number of drugs for which predictions can be obtained (ii) defining a biomarker-based test for Personalized Medicine (PM) that would identify favorable treatments for an individual; and (iii) Improving clinical trial design by excluding a sub-population of patients likely not to respond to the treatment. A key translational feature of the approach is that it does not require training on treatment response data. Thus, in addition to its ability to predict patients' response to approved and well-studied therapies, it can predict the response to new, unexplored treatments. Results: We first tested Enlight in the PM scenario, analyzing 21 patient cohorts from diverse indications, treated with a variety of targeted and immunotherapies. The ENLIGHT treatment matching score is associated with better response with an aggregate Odds Ratio (OR) of 2.59 (95% confidence interval [1.85, 3.55], p= 3.41 e-8). Applied to the WINTHER trial data, encompassing multiple indications and individualized treatments, ENLIGHT recommendations achieved a highly remarkable OR of 11.15 ([2.3, 54.5], p = 8 e-04), demonstrating ENLIGHT’s strong predictive power across a broad spectrum of treatments and cancer types. Second, using ENLIGHT to exclude patients from clinical trials increases the trial response rate, achieving more than 90% of the response rate attainable under an optimal exclusion strategy. Conclusions: ENLIGHT is a powerful transcriptomics-based precision oncology pipeline developed by Pangea Biomed that broadly predicts response to both extant and novel targeted and immune therapies in translationally oriented, clinical terms, going beyond case-specific biomarkers.

4501 Background: Among patients (pts) with untreated aRCC in the CheckMate 9ER trial, superior progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.56) and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.70) were maintained, and objective response and complete response (CR) rates were doubled for nivolumab plus cabozantinib (N+C) vs sunitinib (SUN) with extended 25.4 mo minimum (32.9 mo median) follow-up. This exploratory analysis evaluated the relationship between DepOR and clinical outcomes in CheckMate 9ER. Methods: Eligible pts received N (240 mg) every 2 weeks plus C (40 mg) once daily or SUN (50 mg once daily; 4 weeks of each 6-week cycle). In this analysis, DepOR subgroups were based on best overall response (blinded independent central review [BICR] per RECIST v1.1) and best tumor reduction threshold, as follows: CR; partial response subdivided by a tumor reduction of ≥80%–

PURPOSE: To compare Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 with volumetric measurement in the setting of target lymph nodes that split into two or more nodes or merge into one conglomerate node. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, target lymph nodes were evaluated on CT scans from 166 patients with different types of cancer; 158 of the scans came from The Cancer Imaging Archive. Each target node was measured using RECIST 1.1 criteria before and after merging or splitting, followed by volumetric segmentation. To compare RECIST 1.1 with volume, a single-dimension hypothetical diameter (HD) was determined from the nodal volume. The nodes were divided into three groups: (a) one-target merged (one target node merged with other nodes); (b) two-target merged (two neighboring target nodes merged); and (c) split node (a conglomerate node cleaved into smaller fragments). Bland-Altman analysis and t test were applied to compare RECIST 1.1 with HD. On the basis of the RECIST 1.1 concept, we compared response category changes between RECIST 1.1 and HD. RESULTS: The data set consisted of 30 merged nodes (19 one-target merged and 11 two-target merged) and 20 split nodes (mean age for all 50 included patients, 50 years ± 7 [standard deviation]; 38 men). RECIST 1.1, volumetric, and HD measurements indicated an increase in size in all one-target merged nodes. While volume and HD indicated an increase in size for nodes in the two-target merged group, RECIST 1.1 showed a decrease in size in all two-target merged nodes. Although volume and HD demonstrated a decrease in size of all split nodes, RECIST 1.1 indicated an increase in size in 60% (12 of 20) of the nodes. Discrepancy of the response categories between RECIST 1.1 and HD was observed in 5% (one of 19) in one-target merged, 82% (nine of 11) in two-target merged, and 55% (11 of 20) in split nodes. CONCLUSION: RECIST 1.1 does not optimally reflect size changes when lymph nodes merge or split. Keywords: CT, Lymphatic, Tumor Response Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021