1. Interventional closure vs. medical therapy of patent foramen ovale for secondary prevention of stroke: updated meta-analysis
- Author
-
Michael Böhm, Davor Vukadinović, Felix Mahfoud, Aleksandra Nikolovska Vukadinović, Bruno Scheller, Stephan H. Schirmer, and Christian Ukena
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Septal Occluder Device ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Foramen Ovale, Patent ,Subgroup analysis ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Cochrane Library ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,Risk Factors ,law ,Internal medicine ,Secondary Prevention ,medicine ,Humans ,cardiovascular diseases ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Stroke ,Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ,business.industry ,Anticoagulants ,General Medicine ,Thrombolysis ,medicine.disease ,Cryptogenic stroke ,Treatment Outcome ,Meta-analysis ,Patent foramen ovale ,Cardiology ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - Abstract
We aimed to explore whether interventional closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) results in reduction of composite outcome [stroke/transitory ischemic attack (TIA), death, and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction—TIMI bleeding], stroke and stroke/TIA compared to medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Searching the PUBMED and Cochrane library database, we performed meta-analysis from all randomized controlled studies that compared effects of interventional PFO closure with medical treatment on stroke prevention. 3560 patients from six randomized trials were included. Interventional PFO closure reduced composite outcome (RR of 0.47, 0.26–0.85, p = 0.01), stroke (RR of 0.38, 0.18–0.82, p = 0.01) and stroke/TIA (RR of 0.56, 0.43–0.74, p
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF