Search

PURPOSE To present a summary of the recommendations for the treatment and follow-up for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) as acquired through a questionnaire administered to 99 physicians working in the field of prostate cancer in developing countries who attended the Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference for Developing Countries. METHODS A total of 106 questions out of more than 300 questions addressed the use of imaging in staging mCRPC, treatment recommendations across availability and response to prior drug treatments, appropriate drug treatments, and follow-up, and those same scenarios when limited resources needed to be considered. Responses were compiled and the percentages were presented by clinicians to support each response. Most questions had five to seven relevant options for response including abstain and/or unqualified to answer, or in the case of yes or no questions, the option to abstain was offered. RESULTS Most of the recommendations from this panel were in line with prior consensus, including the preference of a new antiandrogen for first-line therapy of mCRPC. Important aspects highlighted in the scenario of limited resources included the option of docetaxel as treatment preference as first-line treatment in several scenarios, docetaxel retreatment, consideration for reduced doses of abiraterone, and alternative schedules of an osteoclast-targeted therapy. CONCLUSION There was wide-ranging consensus in the treatment for men with mCRPC in both optimal and limited resource settings.

PURPOSE To present a summary of the recommendations for the treatment and follow-up for the biochemical recurrence of castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) as acquired through a questionnaire administered at the Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference for Developing Countries. METHODS A total of 27 questions were identified as relating to this topic. Responses from the clinician were tallied and are presented in percentage format. Topics included the use of imaging in staging, treatment recommendations across different patient scenarios of life expectancy and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time, and follow-up for nonmetastatic castration-resistant PCa. RESULTS A consensus agreed that in optimal conditions, positron emission tomography-computed tomography with prostate-specific membrane antigen would be used although in limited resource situations the combined use of CT of the abdomen and pelvic (or pelvic MRI), a bone scan, and a CT of the thorax or chest x-ray was recommended. In cases when PSA levels double in < 10 months, more than 90% of clinicians agreed on the use of apalutamide or enzalutamide, regardless of life expectancy. With a doubling time of more than 10 months, > 54% of experts recommended no treatment independent of life expectancy. More than half of the experts, regardless of resources, recommended follow-up with a physical examination and PSA levels every 3-6 months and imaging only in the case of symptoms. CONCLUSION The voting results and recommendations presented in this document can be used by physicians to support management for biochemical recurrence of castration-resistant PCa in areas of limited resources. Individual clinical decision making should be supported by available data.

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immunotherapy improved survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Disparities in treatment access are present in healthcare systems globally. The aim of this study was to analyze survival outcomes of mRCC patients treated with first-line TKIs in the public (PHS) and private (PrS) health system in a Brazilian Cancer Center. Materials and Methods: Records from all mRCC patients treated with first-line TKIs from 2007-2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Categorial variables were compared by Fisher's exact test. Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Maier method and survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Prognostic factors were adjusted by Cox regression model. Results: Of the 171 eligible patients, 37 (21.6%) were PHS patients and 134 (78.4%) were PrS patients. There were no difference in age, gender, or sites of metastasis. PHS patients had worse performance status (ECOG ≥2, 35.1% vs. 13.5%, p=0.007), poorer risk score (IMDC poor risk, 32.4% vs. 16.4%, p=0.09), and less nephrectomies (73% vs. 92.5%, p=0.003) than PrS patients. Median lines of therapy was one for PHS versus two for PrS patients (p=0.03). Median overall survival (OS) was 16.5 versus 26.5 months (p=0.002) and progression-free survival (PFS), 8.4 versus 11 months (p=0.01) for PHS and PrS patients, respectively. After adjusting for known prognostic factors on multivariate analysis, PHS patients still had a higher risk of death (HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.01-2.56, p=0.047). Conclusion: Patients with mRCC treated via the PHS had worse overall survival, possibly due to poorer prognosis at presentation and less drug access.

At the 2018 Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium, sponsored by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, significant advances in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were announced. In intermediate-stage disease (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B), interest in combining transarterial chemoembolization and sorafenib has been reignited as a consequence of the TACTICS trial. In advanced-stage disease (BCLC C), external-beam radiotherapy combined with transarterial chemoembolization proved to be superior to sorafenib in patients with portal vein thrombosis according to the START trial. Also, in patients with advanced-stage HCC, the CELESTIAL trial demonstrated survival benefits for patients undergoing treatment with cabozantinib in the second-line setting. Lastly, recent data on the activity of pembrolizumab in patients with HCC highlight the role of immunotherapy in the management of this disease in the years to come.

Background Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) play an important role in progression and metastasis, particularly in form of cluster, which is called circulating tumor microemboli (CTM), and can be found in the peripheral blood of cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of CTCs and CTM, and its influence on tumor progression in lung cancer patients. Methods CTCs were isolated by Isolation by Size of Epithelial Tumor cells (ISET®) Technology. The samples of metastatic lung cancer patients were collected before the beginning of systemic chemotherapy. CTCs and CTM were identified according to their morphological features. Results Fifteen patients were analyzed. Patients who had CTM in blood previously the beginning of systemic therapy had poor progression-free survival (PFS) compared to those with absence of CTM, although without statistical significance (median PFS 3.1 months × 6.7 months, p = 0.29). Moreover, patients without any prior treatment had less than 3 CTCs/mL compared to patients previously exposed to chemotherapy, who had 3 CTCs/mL or more (p = 0.31). Additionally, these patients, with prior treatment, showed poor PFS, compared to chemo-naive patients, although without statistical significance (mean PFS: 4.6 months × 7.3 months, p = 0.47). Conclusions We identified, even in a limited number of samples, that an elevated baseline levels of CTCs and the presence of CTM were associated with poor prognosis in patients with metastatic lung cancer. In addition, we showed that an increase of CTCs counts could indicate a pre-existing resistance. However, further studies with a large cohort are needed to support this information.

Objective: Compare the mortality between critically ill patients who received urgent chemotherapy for a cancer-related life-threatening complication with matched patients (controls) who did not received it. Design: Propensity score-matched retrospective study. Setting: Adult intensive care unit in an oncological hospital. Participants: All adults with solid tumor or hematological malignancies who received at least 1 day of urgent intravenous chemotherapy for a cancer-related life-threatening complication. Using the propensity score method adjusted for 10 variables, patients who received urgent chemotherapy were matched to patients who did not. Interventions: None. Main Outcomes Measures: Intensive care unit and hospital mortality. Results: Forty-seven patients (57% with solid tumors and 43% with hematological malignancies) who received urgent chemotherapy were matched to 94 controls. At intensive care unit admission, patients were similar except that those who received urgent chemotherapy were less likely to have received chemotherapy previously (36% vs 85%; P < .01). The intensive care unit (48.9% vs 23.4%; P < .01) and hospital (76.6% vs 46.8%; P < .01) mortality of the patients who received urgent chemotherapy was higher than the controls. The subgroup analysis showed that the higher mortality was limited to patients with solid tumor. Conclusion: The use of urgent chemotherapy is associated with an increase in the intensive care unit and hospital mortality of unselected critically ill patients with solid tumors but not in patients with hematological malignancies.

Introduction We evaluated overall survival (OS) benefit of complete metastasectomy (CM) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) using a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis to balance groups by age, gender and by the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium prognostic model (IMDC). Methods We included patients (pts) treated at the AC Camargo Cancer Center between 2007 and 2016. Pairs were matched by age, gender and IMDC. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate OS on CM and no-CM group. Results We found 116 pts with clear cell mRCC. After PSM, the number was reduced to 74 (37 CM, 37 no-CM). The median OS for CM and no-CM was 98.3 months and 40.5 months, respectively (hazard ratio 0.24 95%CI 0.11–0.53 p < 0.001). The OS benefit of CM was confirmed on favourable and intermediate IMDC but was absent on poor IMDC. The CM group received less systemic therapy than the no-CM group. Ten pts in the CM group still have no evidence of disease (NED). Conclusion After matching for age, gender and IMDC, we found CM impacts on OS and also diminishes the need for systemic treatment. Survival benefit was confirmed for favourable/intermediate IMDC but not for the poor IMDC prognostic model. Further studies correlating IMDC and metastasectomy are needed to guide clinical decision-making.

Circulating tumor cells are important markers of tumor progression and can reflect tumor behavior in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Identification of proteins that confer resistance to treatment is an important step to predict response and better selection of treatment for patients. Multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1) and Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 (MRP4) play a role in irinotecan-resistance, and Excision Repair Cross-Complementation group 1 (ERCC1) expression can confer resistance to platinum compounds. Here, we included 34 patients with mCRC and most of them received FOLFIRI or FOLFOX chemotherapy (91.1%). CTCs were isolated by ISET(®) Technology and identified in 30 patients (88.2%), with a median of 2.0 CTCs/mL (0-31.0). We analyzed the immunocytochemical expression of MRP1, MRP4 and ERCC1 only in patients who had previously detectable CTCs, accordingly to treatment received (n = 19, 15 and 13 patients, respectively). Among patients treated with irinotecan-based chemotherapy, 4 out of 19 cases with MRP1 positive CTCs showed a worse progression free survival (PFS) in comparison to those with MRP1 negative CTCs (2.1 months vs. 9.1 months; p = 0.003). None of the other proteins studied in CTCs had significant association with PFS. We analyzed also histological sections of primary tumors and metastases by immunohistochemistry, and found no association with clinicopathological characteristics or with PFS. Our results show MRP1 as a potential biomarker of resistance to treatment with irinotecan when found in CTCs from mCRC patients. This is a small proof-of-principle study and these early findings need to be validated in a larger cohort of patients.

e17545 Background: Androgen receptor-targeted agents Abiraterone and Enzalutamide (Abi/Ez) prolonged overall survival in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Patients with very-low serum testosterone levels seem to have less benefit from these therapies as well as more aggressive prostate cancer. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted to evaluate whether a serum testosterone measured at time of start first-line therapy with Abi/Ez is related to overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment failure (TTF) in mCRPC patients. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox-regression models were used for time-to-event analyses. The best cut-off for testosterone was defined using Log-rank statistics (Lausen and Schumacher). X² test and Mann-Whitney U-test were applied to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Logistic regression was used to assess characteristics related to serum testosterone levels. Statistical significance was fixed at 0.05. Results: From May 2012 to February 2017, 100 patients were assessed. Median follow-up was 27.8 months (range 2.23 to 68.26). Pts with a high testosterone level ( > 28.2; n = 20) achieved a significantly higher OS (median 66.0 vs 31.9 mo, testosterone > 28.2 HR: 0.206, 95% CI 0.074 to 0.571, p = 0.002) and TTF (median 30.6 vs 11.8 mo, testosterone > 28.2 HR: 0.408, 95%CI 0.219 to 0.762, p = 0.005) than pts with a low serum testosterone level ( < 28.2; n = 80), regardless of receiving therapy with either Abi (n = 69) or Ez (n = 31). Pts with a higher testosterone level were younger (median 67.7 vs 73.6 years; p = 0.026), had a higher body mass index (BMI) (28.5 vs 25.9, p = 0.023) and a lower PSA at start Abi/Ez (12 vs 26, p = 0.031) than pts with lower values. Age (OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.8 to 0.9, p = 0.021), BMI (OR 1.21, 95%CI 1.1 to 1.4, p = 0.006) and baseline PSA (OR 1.2, 95%CI 1.03 to 1.4, p = 0.020) were significantly associated with testosterone > 28.2. After 4 months of Abi/Ez treatment, PSA decrease > 50% of baseline was seen more frequently in high testosterone levels group than in low testosterone levels pts (90% vs 57.5% of pts, respectively, p = 0.007). Conclusions: Pts with high levels of testosterone ( > 28.2) achieved a better OS and TTF when treated with Abi/Ez in first-line mCRPC than those with low levels. Testosterone can be considered a prognostic and predictive biomarker in this scenario, and could be used in treatment decision for this population.

e17538 Background: mCRPC phenotype involves androgen-receptor signalling mechanisms that support the use of abiraterone/enzalutamide (Abi/Ez). These therapies improve overall survival (OS) and quality-of-life, with a favourable safety profile. There is no validated data defining the best drug or sequence to be used. Methods: A retrospective study evaluated if a nomogram helps the decision-making of first-line for mCRPC. The nomogram evaluated time-to-treatment failure (TTF) from Abi/Ez and Docetaxel (Doc) treatment and had C-índex of 0.726. Time from start of androgen deprivation therapy to Abi/Ez or Doc, pain, Gleason score, testosterone and the lowest PSA in castration-sensitive scenario were analysed. All patients (pts) in Doc group used second-line Abi/Ez. The outcomes were: to evaluate whether the nomogram scores were associated with TTF/OS in Abi/Ez population; to compare OS between Abi/Ez and Doc poor prognostic (PP) groups based on the nomogram scores. Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression models were used for time-to-event analyses. The cut-off was defined by Log-Rank. Statistical significance was fixed at 0.05. Results: From May/12 to Feb/20, 123 pts were assessed (79 received first-line Abi/Ez and 44 Doc). Median follow-up was 25.7 months (1.6 to 93.7). Nomogram scores based on Abi/Ez treatment (medium score of 65, 0-225) were statistically associated with OS (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.02, p < 0.001) and TTF (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.02-1.03, p < 0.001). 79 pts who received Abi/Enz were stratified as having good (GP) (score < 46), intermediate (IP) (score 46-112) and PP (score > 112), and it was associated with 75%, 25-75% and 25% probability to 1-year free from treatment failure, respectively. Pts with GP (n = 24) had a median TTF of 29.8m (15.4-44.2), IP (n = 44) 9.8m (4.1-15.4) and PP (n = 11), 4m (2.5-5.5), p = < 0.001. Pts with GP achieved higher TTF than IP (HR 2.3 95% CI 1.3-4.2 p = 0.005) and PP (HR 8.9 95% CI 3.8-20.6 p < 0.001). The results were similar for OS, once the median for GP was 54.0m (30.5-77.6); IP 34.8m (32.2-37.5); and PP 13.6m (9.3-17.9), p = 0.023 (GP versus IP: HR 2.1 95% CI 1.01-4.4 p = 0.046; GP vs PP: HR 3.6 95%CI 1.4-9.6 p = 0.011). Pts with a higher score and PP from Abi/Ez group were compared with Doc pts at first-line (n = 44), showing worse OS (HR 2.4 95%CI 1.03-5.6 p = 0.042) when treated with Abi/Ez. Conclusions: The nomograns scores showed good correlation with TTF/OS. In PP groups, treatment with Doc was associated with better OS than Abi/Ez, suggesting a possible tool on the first-line decision making.

202 Background: Survival outcomes for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients (pts) have greatly improved following the approval of Docetaxel and abiraterone(Abi)/enzalutamide(Ez). However, it is not clear who is likely to benefit more from these therapies in real life clinical practice. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed with mCRPC pts treated with Abi/Ez in pre-Docetaxel setting. Primary endpoint: to identify predictive biomarkers of long time to treatment failure (TTF), develop a nomogram and convert it into a web app. Secondary endpoint: to correlate biomarkers with overall survival (OS). Kaplan Meier survival estimates and Cox Regression models were used for time-to-event analyses. Statistical analysis was made with R software. All statistical tests were two-sided and statistical significance was fixed at 0.05. Results: From May2012 to October2017, 117 pts were assessed, 81 received Abi and 36 Ez. Median follow-up of 21 months (mo), estimated median TTF was 12.8mo (95%CI 9.98-15.7) for the total population. Predictive biomarkers for TTF included in the first nomogram model were time from start of androgen deprivation therapy (tADT) to start of Abi/Ez, pain at baseline, Gleason score, baseline testosterone and lower PSA nadir in castration sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC). The second nomogram model included pain and Gleason plus neutrophil counts, tADT to CRPC and baseline PSA at CRPC. C-index: 0.726 and 0.731 respectively, providing a reliable prediction of long-term benefit with Abi/Ez in this setting. All these characteristics were significantly associated with OS. Conclusions: The two nomogram achieved a good internal validation and can work as a tool to the decision-making process of the best strategy to first-line therapy in mCRPC pts.[Table: see text]

e16540 Background: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) phenotype involves androgen-receptor signalling mechanisms that support the use of enzalutamide (EZ) and abiraterone (Abi). These therapies improve overall survival (OS) and quality-of-life, with a favourable safety profile. There is no validated data defining the best drug or sequence to be used. Methods: A retrospective cohort of mCRPC patients (pts) was analysed at AC Camargo Cancer Center. The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in patients treated with EZ or Abi as first line (docetaxel naïve pts). Kaplan-Meier, Log-Rank Test and Cox Regression were used for survival analysis. To address unbalanced characteristics between the two treatment groups treatment efficacy was compared in a propensity score matched cohort. Results: From May, 2002 to September, 2017, 120 pts were treated with Abi (84%) or EZ (36%). Median follow-up was 21.2 months. Median age at diagnosis was 66 (48-84), the majority were Gleason score 7 (34%) and median baseline PSA was 14. Median PFS was 17.4 months in EZ and 10.6 months in Abi group (HR = 0.65; 95%CI: 0.39-1.10; p = 0.11). Median OS was not reached and 31.6 months for EZ and Abi, respectively (HR = 0.60; 95%CI: 0.27-1.36; p = 0.22). EZ was associated with a better PSA response in the first 4 months of treatment (p < 0.001). Independent prognostic factors for worse OS and PFS were ECOG ≥ 1, treatment toxicity ≥ G1 and lower PSA doubling time before treatment and for better OS and PFS were PSA response in the first 4 months and alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase response at any time. In the propensity score matched cohort including 72 patients PFS was better in EZ group (HR = 0.36; 95%CI: 0.20-0.64; p < 0.001) but there was no difference in OS (HR = 0.66; 95%CI: 0.27-1.63; p = 0.37). Conclusions: EZ was associated with prolonged PFS and better PSA response, with no OS improvement when compared with Abi for mCRPC before docetaxel, in a propensity score matched analysis.

588 Background: Data on 1st line treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in elderly patients(pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is controversial, and there is rationale for inferior outcomes due to multiple comorbidities and polypharmacy. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between the elderly (E) and non-elderly (NE) in 1st line therapy, and to explore factors influencing survival and toxicity. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all medical records of mRCC pts treated with 1st line TKI at our institution (2007 – 2018). Categorial variables were compared by Fisher’s exact test and continuous, Mann–Whitney. Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Maier method, prognostic factors adjusted by Cox regression model. Results: From 171 eligible pts, 64 (37.4%) had ≥ 65years old, with median age of 70.5 for E and 56 for NE. In both groups most were male, had clear cell histology, good/intermediate IMDC risk, prior nephrectomy and > 1 metastatic (mets) site. Sites of mets were evenly distributed. E pts had more diabetes (35.9 vs16.8%, p.009) , hypertension (67.2 vs 46.7%, p.01), cardiovascular disease (15.6 vs 6.5%, p.06), moderate/severe renal dysfunction (62.5 vs 28.8%, p < 0001), high Charlson Comorbidities Index (CCI≥3, 48.4% vs 20.8%, p < .0001), polypharmacy (34.4 vs15.9%, p.008), worst ECOG (≥2, 28.2 vs 12.3%, p.01), and a trend to worst nutrition (weight loss 35.9 vs 22.5%, p.07). Sunitinib was used for 60.9 vs 79.4%, Pazopanib 35.9 vs 18.7%, Sorafenib 3.1 vs 1.9%, comparing E and NE pts. Median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was 23.7 vs 25.6m (p.8) and 9.3 vs 10.9m (p.7), respectively. After adjusting for prognostic factors, age continues not to influence OS (HR 1.17, IC95 0.77-1.78, p.45). Grade (G) 3/4 toxicity was seen in 59.4 vs 53.3%, dose reduction in 54.7 vs 53.3% and suspension due to toxicity 25 vs 13.3% for E and NE, respectively. In the E, none of the comorbidities, CCI or polypharmacy impaired OS or toxicity, but pts using sunitinibe had greater G3/4 toxicity than with pazopanib (71.8 vs 39.1%, p.02). Conclusions: Elderly had similar outcomes to NE pts, despite greater comorbidities and polypharmacy, hence efficacious therapies shouldn’t avoided. Pazopanib seems to be safer in this subgroup.

644 Background: The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and recently immunotherapy has brought major survival benefits for metastatic renal cancer (mRCC) patients (pts). In Brazil, there is no approved 2nd line treatment for mRCC in the Public Health System (PHS). Our center is unique, because it provides care for both PHS and Private System (PrS) population, enabling us to make the comparison of overall survival (OS) of these pts. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all mRCC pts treated with 1st line TKI at our service from 2007 to 2018. Categorial variables were compared by Fisher’s exact test and continuous by Mann–Whitney. Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Maier method, prognostic factors adjusted by Cox regression model. Results: 171 pts were eligible, 37 (21.6%) PHS and 134 (78.4%) PrS pts. Between the two groups, there was no differences in age, gender, number and sites of metastasis (mets). PHS pts had worst ECOG (≥2, in 35.1 vs 13.5%, p .007), a trend towards more poor IMDC risk (IMDC favorable 16.2 vs 26.6%, intermediate 51.4 vs 57%, poor 32.4 vs 16.4%, p.09), had less nephrectomies (73 vs 92.5%, p.008) and more non clear cell histology (32.4 vs 12.7%, p.01). Median lines of therapy were 1 for PHS vs 2 for PrS pts (p.03). Sunitinib was the 1st line agent for 91.9 vs 67.2%, and pazopanib 8.1 vs 29.9%, of the PHS and PrS pts, respectively. Median time from diagnosis of mets to treatment start was 2.29 vs 1.79 m (p.59). Median OS was 16.5 vs 26.5 m (p.0002) and progression free survival, 8.4 vs 11 m (p.01), for the PHS vs PrS. On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for factors that were present before the beginning of treatment and were statistically significant for OS in the univariate model, PHS pts still had higher risk of death (HR 1.85, IC 95 1.2-2.9, p.01), probably due to having received fewer lines of therapy (≥2 lines of therapy vs 1, HR 0.51, IC95 0.4-0.7, p .001). Conclusions: Brazilian PHS pts had significant worse OS compared to PrS pts, in part due to less access to drugs. Access to cancer drugs is a challenge worldwide, and in Brazil effort has to be done to change this reality.

There are few reported cases in the literature of metastasis to the appendix. A 44-year-old patient presented with abdominal pain and changes in the bowel pattern. Thoracic and abdominal computed tomography scans evidenced pulmonary and liver nodules. The pulmonary nodule was biopsied and the hematoxylin-and-eosin (HE) stained slides showed an adenocarcinoma. The immunohistochemistry profile demonstrated positivity for CK7 and TTF-1. The patient underwent an appendectomy. HE stained slides also demonstrated adenocarcinoma infiltrating the entire appendix wall along with the epithelial surface with immunohistochemistry study of the appendix neoplasm showing exactly the same results as seen in the first panel.

Virgílio Souza e Silva,1 Ludmilla Thomé Domingos Chinen,2 Emne A Abdallah,2 Aline Damascena,2 Jociana Paludo,3 Rubens Chojniak,3 Aldo Lourenço Abbade Dettino,1 Celso Abdon Lopes deMello,1 Vanessa S Alves,2 Marcello F Fanelli1 1Department of Clinical Oncology, 2International Research Center, 3Image Department, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cancer worldwide. New prognostic markers are needed to identify patients with poorer prognosis, and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) seem to be promising to accomplish this.Patients and methods: A prospective study was conducted by blood collection from patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC), three times, every 2months in conjunction with image examinations for evaluation of therapeutic response. CTC isolation and counting were performed by Isolation by Size of Epithelial Tumor Cells (ISET).Results: A total of 54 patients with mCRC with a mean age of 57.3years (31–82 years) were included. Among all patients, 60% (n=32) were carriers of wild-type KRAS (WT KRAS) tumors and 90% of them (n=29) were exposed to monoclonal antibodies along with systemic treatment. Evaluating CTC kinetics, when we compared the baseline (pretreatment) CTC level (CTC1) with the level at first follow-up (CTC2), we observed that CTC1-positive patients (CTCs above the median), who became negative (CTCs below the median) had a favorable evolution (n=14), with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 14.7months. This was higher than that for patients with an unfavorable evolution (CTC1– that became CTC2+; n=13, 6.9months; P=0.06). Patients with WT KRAS with favorable kinetics had higher PFS (14.7months) in comparison to those with WT KRAS with unfavorable kinetics (9.4months; P=0.02). Moreover, patients whose imaging studies showed radiological progression had an increased quantification of CTCs at CTC2 compared to those without progression (P=0.04).Conclusion: This study made possible the presentation of ISET as a feasible tool for evaluating CTC kinetics in patients with mCRC, which can be promising in their clinical evaluation. Keywords: circulating tumor cells, metastatic colorectal cancer, kinetics, ISET

e22027Background: Elderly population requires special attention to chemotherapy risks and comorbidities, which may limit the capacity to deliver optimal cancer care. We aimed to describe the featur...

Background Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a common pattern of recurrence in gastric cancer and is associated with a poor prognosis. Determining predictive factors for peritoneal recurrence can help the selection of patients suitable for more aggressive treatment strategies. Methods A retrospective chart review of 162 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer with no peritoneal carcinomatosis and treated at a single institution in Brazil from January 1994 to December 2004 was carried out. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify patient and tumor-related characteristics associated with the development of peritoneal metastasis. Results Twenty-three (14.2%) patients developed peritoneal carcinomatosis. Three independent factors associated with the development of peritoneal metastasis were identified by multivariate analysis: signet-ring cell histology (odds ratio [OR] = 4.9; P = 0.018), the presence of vascular invasion (OR = 4.8; P = 0.022), and the presence of visceral metastasis at diagnosis (OR = 5.1; P = 0.011). Tumor stages T3 or T4 showed a trend towards significance (P = 0.062). Conclusions Patients with gastric cancer presenting with signet-ring histology, vascular invasion, or visceral metastasis appear to be at higher risk for the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis. J. Surg. Oncol. 2009;100:452–455. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Burnout syndrome is a common occurrence among oncologists. Doctors enrolled in residency programs in clinical oncology are exposed to similar risk factors; however, few data are available in this population. This study assessed the occurrence of burnout and associated factors among first-year residents at Brazilian institutions. The present prospective, multicenter, cohort study was conducted with doctors enrolled in residency programs in clinical oncology at Brazilian institutions affiliated with the public health system. The participants answered a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), Lipp's Stress Inventory, and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), upon admission to the program and 6 and 12 months later. Of 37 eligible residency programs in 2009, 11 (30.6 %) agreed to participate in the study. Fifty-four residents, representing 100 % of new admissions to the participating institutions, were included. Most of the participants met the criteria for severe burnout upon admission to the residency programs (emotional exhaustion in 49.0 % and depersonalization in 64.7 %). The scores on MBI domains emotional exhaustion and depersonalization increased significantly (p

Circulating tumor cells are important markers of tumor progression and can reflect tumor behavior in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Identification of proteins that confer resistance to treatment is an important step to predict response and better selection of treatment for patients. Multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1) and Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 (MRP4) play a role in irinotecan-resistance, and Excision Repair Cross-Complementation group 1 (ERCC1) expression can confer resistance to platinum compounds. Here, we included 34 patients with mCRC and most of them received FOLFIRI or FOLFOX chemotherapy (91.1%). CTCs were isolated by ISET(®) Technology and identified in 30 patients (88.2%), with a median of 2.0 CTCs/mL (0-31.0). We analyzed the immunocytochemical expression of MRP1, MRP4 and ERCC1 only in patients who had previously detectable CTCs, accordingly to treatment received (n = 19, 15 and 13 patients, respectively). Among patients treated with irinotecan-based chemotherapy, 4 out of 19 cases with MRP1 positive CTCs showed a worse progression free survival (PFS) in comparison to those with MRP1 negative CTCs (2.1 months vs. 9.1 months; p = 0.003). None of the other proteins studied in CTCs had significant association with PFS. We analyzed also histological sections of primary tumors and metastases by immunohistochemistry, and found no association with clinicopathological characteristics or with PFS. Our results show MRP1 as a potential biomarker of resistance to treatment with irinotecan when found in CTCs from mCRC patients. This is a small proof-of-principle study and these early findings need to be validated in a larger cohort of patients.

We studied the effect of oral and portal vein administration of alloantigens on mouse skin allograft survival. Graft receptor BALB/c mice received spleen cells (30, 90, 150 or 375 x 10(6)) from donor C57BL/6 mice intragastrically on three successive days, starting seven days before the skin graft. Allograft survival was significantly increased with the feeding of 150 x 10(6) allogeneic spleen cells by one gavage (median survival of 12 vs 14 days, P< or =0.005) or when 300 x 10(6) cells were given in six gavage (12 vs 14 days, P

335 Background: Despite therapeutic progress in the management of advanced prostate cancer during the past decade, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains a disease that causes substantial morbidity and mortality worldwide. A greater understanding of biomarkers permits to guide personalized therapy and can inform clinical trials tailored to men most likely to derive benefit from a given therapy. We aimed to identify prognostic biomarker candidates of Abiraterone Acetate (AA) response in mCRPC patients. Methods: A retrospective clinical records analysis of mCRPC patients treated with AA at A. C. Camargo Cancer Center between January 2012 to December 2016 was realized. Baseline clinical parameters evaluated were: Age, ECOG performance status, metastatic disease at diagnosis, Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Neuroendocrine differentiation, duration of previous androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), PSA doubling-time (PSAdt), Timing of AA (chemotherapy-naïve or not), PSA response and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level. Data were analyzed in relation to progression free survival (PFS) stratified by each parameter. Results: We included 141 patients with mCRPC treated with AA to correlate prognostic biomarkers with PFS. Five risk factors individually were associated with poor prognosis and a high risk to progression during AA therapy and were included in the final model: ECOG ≥2 [Relative risk (RR) = 1.52]; PSAdt < 3 months (RR = 2.7); PSA response ( < 50% decline) (RR = 3.03); AA post docetaxel (RR = 1.63) and duration of previous ADT < 12 months (RR = 1.52). The probability to progression free survival in patients receiving AA calculated in 1, 2 and 3 years, was 39,2%, 15,2% and 6,2%, respectively. Conclusions: This analysis identified five factors used to model survival in mCRPC patients treat with AA in our institutional series. Whereas no biomarker has been validated as a predictor of response to a therapy in mCRPC, these those potential clinical biomarkers may help clinicians in distinguishing patients with mCRPC who would obtain the best survival benefit from AA treatment.

Thymidylate synthase (TYMS) is an important enzyme for 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) metabolism in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. The search for this enzyme in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can be a powerful tool to follow‐up cancer patients. mCRC patients were enrolled before the beginning of 5‐FU‐based chemotherapy. The blood was filtered on Isolation by Size of Epithelial Tumor Cells (ISET), and the analysis of TYMS expression in CTCs was made by immunocytochemistry. Additionally, we verified TYMS staining in primary tumors and metastases from the same patients. There were included 54 mCRC patients and 47 of them received 5‐FU‐based chemotherapy. The median CTCs number was 2 per mL. We were not able to analyze immunocytochemistry in 13 samples (9 patients with absence of CTCs and 4 samples due to technical reasons). Therefore, TYMS expression on CTCs was analyzed in 34 samples and was found positive in 9 (26.5%). Six of these patients had tumor progression after treatment with 5‐FU. We found an association between CTC TYMS staining and disease progression (DP), although without statistical significance (P = 0.07). TYMS staining in primary tumors and metastases tissues did not have any correlation with disease progression (P = 0.67 and P = 0.42 respectively). Patients who had CTC count above the median (2 CTCs/mL) showed more TYMS expression (P = 0.02) correlating with worse prognosis. Our results searching for TYMS staining in CTCs, primary tumors and metastases suggest that the analysis of TYMS can be useful tool as a 5‐FU resistance predictor biomarker if analyzed in CTCs from mCRC patients., What's new? Currently, the common treatment strategy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients is 5‐Fluorouracil‐based chemotherapy, which shows high efficacy in a subset of patients. Even those patients, however, can experience disease progression due to 5‐FU resistance. There are indications that the DNA replication and repair enzyme thymidylate synthase (TYMS) may be involved. Here, the authors set to measure circulating tumor cells levels and search for TYMS staining to correlate these findings with clinical outcome. The results suggest that circulating tumor cells represent a powerful tool to follow up 5‐FU resistance in metastatic colorectal cancer patients in real time, by TYMS expression analysis.

e566 Background: Cabazitaxel is an approved second-line treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer therapy with a significant survival benefit compared to mitoxantrone. There are few data about cabazitaxel's toxicity in patients not selected. Objective: Evaluate the efficacy and toxicity among younger (< 70 years) and older (> 70 years) population. Methods: We selected 62 patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer treated in AC Camargo Cancer Center from January 2011 to July 2015. 58 patients fulfilled the study criteria: diagnosis of adenocarcinoma prostate cancer, at least one session of cabazitaxel, with more than 18 years old. Results: We had in our sample 33 patients less than 70 years and 25 over 70 years. The initial dose of cabazitaxel was 25 mg/m2 in 75.8% of patients < 70 years and 52% in > 70 years patients. The use of granulocytics growing factor was observed in 64% of the older patients and more than 80% of this indication was in primary profilaxis. There were five deaths associated to the treatment, 4 lung infection and 1 kidney failure. The worst grade of adverse event up to 30 days after last administration was grade 2, including hematological and non-hematological events, both with no statistical significance between the groups. However, there was a greater number of febrile neutropenia in elderly people (28% versus 6%) with a statistical significance between < 70 e > 70 years (p 0.031). OS was 13,7 months (IC 9.16 – 18.2) and PFS was 4,6 months (IC 3.43 – 5.73). OS among the two groups was lower in < 70 years reaching 9,3 months (IC 2.06-16.5) versus 22.2 months (IC 4.86-39.50 ), p= 0.073. As well, PFS in < 70 years was 3.8 months (IC 3.26-4.36) versus 4.6 months (IC 2.4-14.1), p = 0.02. Conclusions: Treatment with cabazitaxel is tolerable, with manageable adverse events in a real-world patient population. In our cohort, elderly population (> 70 years) had more febrile neutropenia, suggesting dose reduction in this population, indication of granulocytic growing factor as primary profilaxis, close monitoring, and adequate patient counseling.

525 Background: TKI have improved the prognosis of patients with mRCC, but rarely lead to durable response. Predictive clinical biomarkers have been studied in the last few years, but most are still controversial. Objective: Identify the role of the clinical and laboratorial biomarkers of prognosis and outcome in mRCC. Methods: A retrospective study with mRCC treated with VEGFR-TKi in first line at A C Camargo Cancer Center (Jan-07 to Apr-16). Studied biomarkers: induced hypertension (HTN), acquiried hypothyroidism, proteinuria, and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Data were analized in relation to progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objetive response rate (ORR) stratified by each marker. Results: We included 94 patients (76.6% sunitinib, 21.3% pazopanib, 2.1% sorafenib). Overall, ORR to VEGFR-TKI was 41.1%; clinical benefit rate was 82.1% (43% Stable disease). Median PFS was 11.4 months (mo)(CI 95% 8.7-14.1) and median OS was 32.1 mo(CI 95% 23.4-40.8). HTN was numerically associated with longer PFS (20.1 vs. 8.2 mo) and OS (37.2 vs. 28.2 mo), but not statistically significant. Only high level TSH (>10) was associated with significant longer PFS and OS, p=0.001 and paweek) predicted poor OS (9.6 vs 33.9 mo). A “NLR conversion” (before ≥3, turn to

e21522Background: Education in GO is of extreme importance, due to epidemiology and since aging is a important risk factor for cancer. The oncology community has to deal with how to educate the wor...

e21520Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most frequent cancer in men and women, corresponding about 9% of tumors in both sexes. Regarding mortality rate, it also ranks as the third one. Esp...

CONTEXT: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progresses to distant metastases in most cases. The most frequent sites for distant metastases are the bones, central nervous system, adrenal glands and liver. Dissemination to the skin, myocardium, thyroid gland and intestine may occur, but is rare. CASE REPORT: We describe a case of squamous cell carcinoma in the lungs, with metastases in the colon and thyroid, in a 66-year-old female patient. The lesion was unresectable and chemotherapy was started. The patient evolved with intestinal subocclusion, and colonoscopy showed the presence of a polyp. Biopsy and immunohistochemical analysis on the polyp showed that it was compatible with squamous cell carcinoma of pulmonary origin. At a follow-up consultation, the patient presented a thyroid nodule. A aspiration biopsy and cellblock immunohistochemistry confirmed the squamous cell carcinoma of pulmonary origin. After third-line chemotherapy, the patient progressed with acute obstructive abdomen due to a retroperitoneal mass. She underwent exploratory laparotomy and died due to surgical complications. Metastases to the thyroid and colon are rarely reported in cases of epidermoid carcinoma of the lungs. Gastrointestinal involvement in pulmonary metastases may affect the stomach, small intestine and colon, and cases of bleeding and perforation have already been reported. Although richly vascularized, the thyroid is an infrequent site for metastases. Such sites reflect poor prognoses for the clinical evolution. We did not find any previous reports in the literature, on lung cancer with metastases concomitantly in the colon and thyroid, in a single patient.

Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of death due to cancer worldwide and is particularly prevalent in Brazil. Promising new therapeutic agents have already shown activity in some gastrointestinal malignancies and their role in gastric cancer will need to be evaluated. Determining the prognostic factors of survival for patients with gastric cancer can help in identifying patients with a worse prognosis after treatment with the current chemotherapeutic regimens.A retrospective chart review of 186 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer and treated at a single institution in Brazil from January 1994 to December 2004 was carried out. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify patient- and tumor-related characteristics associated with peritoneal metastasis at diagnosis and with overall survival.Of the 186 patients, 76 were alive at the time of this analysis. The median survival for all patients was 30.1 months. Two independent factors associated with the presence of peritoneal metastasis at diagnosis were identified by multivariate analysis: signet-ring cell type (odds ratio [OR], 10.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1 to 37.5), and visceral metastasis (OR, 51.8; 95% CI, 12.4 to 215.4). The prognostic factors for poor survival were tumor stage T3 or T4 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.87; 95% CI, 1.09 to 3.22) and visceral metastasis (HR, 4.98; 95% CI, 3.02 to 8.20).Two factors correlated with peritoneal metastasis and two prognostic factors for survival were identified. These findings may contribute to clinical decision-making, treatment tailoring, and the design of future trials.

A linfangite pulmonar neoplásica (LPN) é a disseminação intrapulmonar de células neoplásicas metastáticas via vasos linfáticos, englobando 6 a 8% das metástases pulmonares. Seu desconforto sintomático tem grande impacto na qualidade de vida (QdV) e seu prognóstico é muito reservado. Nosso objetivo foi avaliar os aspectos clínicos, o tratamento, a QdV e a sobrevida em LPN, em um estudo prospectivo. O seguimento mediano foi de 32 dias; 79% dos pacientes foram seguidos por menos de 6 meses, devido a evolução desfavorável e óbito. A idade mediana dos pacientes foi de 60,5 anos; 65% eram mulheres. A maioria dos sítios primários de neoplasia foram pulmão e mama (88%). A QdV estava comprometida, mas podiam ter algum benefício terapêutico, especialmente com corticosteróides, e a quimioterapia melhorou a sobrevida. Algumas variáveis foram estatisticamente significantes para predizer o status de sobrevida em um mês: Karnofsky performance scale (KPS)>=60%, hemoglobina(Hb)>=10 g/dL, LPN unilateral, PO2>=60 mmHg, tratamento oncológico sistêmico e sem necessidade de ventilação assistida não-invasiva. Preditores significantes de maior sobrevida mediana foram: KPS>=60%, SpO2>=90%, Hb>=10 g/dL, sem hipoxemia (PO2>=60 mmHg), sem necessidade de oxigenioterapia, tratamento com opióide fraco, tratamento oncológico sistêmico e ausência de ventilação assistida. O tratamento sintomático deve ser ativo, oferecendo melhor QdV aos pacientes e familiares e o tratamento etiológico é importante. As avaliações de QdV facilitam a relação médico-paciente, além da informação prognostica ser crucial para ajudar na definição e planejamento terapêuticos, uma vez que análises de parâmetros de custo-benefício e metas realistas são essenciais para cuidados oncológicos paliativos de boa qualidade, especialmente em síndromes com prognóstico reservado, tal como a LPN. Our objective was to evaluate clinical aspects, treatment, QoL, and survival, in NPL in a prospective study. Median follow-up was of 32 days; 79% percent of patients were followed for less than 6 months, due to bad outcome. Median age was 60.5 years; 65% were female. Most primary tumor sites were lung and breast cancers (88%). QoL was compromised, but could have treatment benefit, especially with corticosteroids, and chemotherapy improved survival. Some variables were statistically significant for predicting survival status in one month, such as: Karnofsky performance scale (KPS)>=60%, hemoglobin>=10 g/dL, unilateral NPL, PO2>=60 mmHg, oncological systemic treatment, and no need for noninvasive assisted ventilation. Significant predictors of longer median survival were: KPS>=60%, SpO2>=90%, hemoglobin>=10 g/dL, without hypoxemia (PO2>=60 mmHg), no need for oxygen therapy, weak opioid treatment, systemic oncological treatment, and absence of assisted ventilation. Symptomatic treatment must be active, offering better QoL to patients and their families, and etiological treatment is important. QoL evaluation facilitates patient-physician relationship, and prognostic information is crucial to help in defining treatment plan, since cost-benefit parameter analysis and realistic goals are essential in good-quality palliative cancer care, especially for syndromes with poor prognosis, such as NPL.

e22036 Background: CTCs have demonstrated promising results as a prognostic tool in patients with mCCR. The purpose of our study was to prospectively correlate CTCs counting with clinical outcomes ...

CGA is gaining importance in treatment of elderly cancer patients, since ageing is a global phenomenon. That shift in demographics has huge impact in healthcare. However, the more reliable validated way to apply CGA in Geriatric Oncology is an open research field so far. The efforts to find the best interdisciplinary approach for conducting CGA in daily clinical practice demand a worldwide multi-institutional collaboration. This presentation will review some topics in Geriatric Oncology, highlighting strategies and difficulties of implementing such a unit. Daily routine of a interdisciplinary Geriatric Oncologic team work will be discussed, to put into the context of a high volume cancer hospital, the daily needs of caring for elderly oncology patients. Attending public will discuss, among other topics: a) epidemiology of aging and cancer around the world; b) efforts to better care in geriatric oncology; c) CGA in cancer patients; d) important points in geriatric oncology in different settings (public or private; acute or intensive care unit, ambulatory, nursery, hospice, home care); e) administrative and financial support for geriatric oncology. In A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, in Sao Paulo, Brazil, we are starting a project hoping for government grant, aiming to: □ Detect predictive factors of complications in oncological treatment □ Propose treatment protocols adapted to functional capacity, to avoid over and under treatment. □ Offer ways to rehabilitation of reversible vulnerability and frailty, with combined interprofessional work. □ Prevent additional common complications in elderly: falls, polypharmacy, undernutrition, depression, sarcopenia, for example. □ Detect early signs of psychological or cognitive alterations that may contribute to additional deficits. □ Offer home, ambulatory and hospital support to all patients, specially for the ones that cannot receive specific cancer treatment. □ Combine assistance to comorbidities with the oncology team. Topics above will be illustrated by our experience, initiated in 2010, in the implementation of a Geriatric Oncology Unit in A. C. Camargo Cancer Center – one of the largest oncology hospitals in Latin America – specially how to apply a time-consuming elderly evaluation in a high volume cancer center for multidisciplinary treatment. In our initial retrospective cohort, the incorporation of CGA in daily practice was feasible and useful to predict needs and complications of systemic cancer treatment, like dose adjustment, ability to complete proposed treatment, and hospitalisation. Next step should be to look for correlations with markers of efficacy, such as survival and quality of life. We believe that the comparison of different approaches in Geriatric Oncology may help to improve their applications in many settings and services, with good ideas being applied with local contextualisation. Those efforts will directly benefit elderly cancer patients. Disclosure of interest: None declared

e22020 Background: The presence of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is a necessary process for cancer progression. In fact, its detection has surged as a potential biomarker for clinical response in ...

e22021 Background: Pancreatic cancer has a high mortality rate. Given the aggressiveness of the disease, we still lack molecular markers for predicting prognosis. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) hav...

e21520 Background: TACE local palliative therapy has been increasingly employed in clinical practice for managing patients (pts) harboring chemotherapy (CT) refractory RMAMT. Relief of symptoms, e....

9549 Background: Ageing is a global phenomenon, also in Brazil. That shift in demographics has huge impact in healthcare. Although still emerging in developing nations, there is no major national i...

e22016 Background: CRC is the third most prevalent cancer worldwide. New prognostic markers are needed to identify patients with worse prognosis and to aid the development of more effective therape...

e18078 Background: First-line treatment of advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with platinum-based doublets, including pemetrexed (P) or bevacizumab (B), has achieved more than 12 months of survival. At the moment, there are no phase III head-to-head comparisons of these combinations. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed, from 05/2007 to 02/2011, in a single institution, all pts with stage IIIB or IV nonsquamous NSCLC treated with B or P combined with platinum compounds in first-line treatment to determine differences in OS, PFS, ORR and toxicity. We performed multivariate analysis to identify prognostic factors for survival. Results: Of the 82 pts included, 40 pts (48,8%) received carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/gemcitabine combined with B (BEV group), while 42 pts (51,2%) received cisplatin or carboplatin combined with P (PEM group). BEV had significantly fewer pts with age > 70 years (p=0,01) and CNS metastases (p