1. Laparoscopic versus open lumbar sympathectomy in critical limb threatening ischemia patients in Egypt
- Author
-
Wael E. Shaalan, Ali A. Elemam, Hassan Lotfy, Ahmad R. Naga, Mohamed I. Mohamed, Yomna E. Dean, and Tamer N. Abdelbaki
- Subjects
Sympathectomy ,Laparoscopic surgery ,Chronic limb-threatening ischemia ,Laparoscopic sympathectomy ,Lumbar sympathectomy ,Sympathetic denervation ,Surgery ,RD1-811 - Abstract
Abstract Purpose The treatment of critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is revascularization. Lumbar sympathectomy (LS) could be attempted when this is not amenable. Using laparoscopic techniques to perform LS adds the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Methods Twenty-four patients, presenting with non-reconstructable CLTI and rest pain, were randomly divided into group I (14 patients) who underwent retroperitoneoscopic lumbar sympathectomy (RPLS) and group II (10 patients) who had conventional open lumber sympathectomy (COLS). Results RPLS patients had shorter hospital stays, fewer intraoperative complications, and less postoperative pain. However, the mean operative time was significantly longer (86.4 ± 9.1 min, p-value: 0.02) in the RPLS group but decreased with each subsequent case after that. The differences in post-operative capillary refill time, ABI, TBI, and TcPO2 were not statistically significant between both groups (p-values: 0.97, 0.13, 0.32, 0.10, respectively). However, the difference in the quality-of-life score was statistically significant; the mean (± SD) SF-36 score increased from 48 ± 6.8 to 81 ± 4.4 (p-value
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF