1. Magnetism of CuCl 2 ·2D 2 O and CuCl 2 ·2H 2 O, and of CuBr 2 ·6H 2 O
- Author
-
Michael J. Wagner, A.S. Hampton, M.J. Van Dongen, C.H. Komatsu, N.S. Benday, Gary C. DeFotis, Kevin A. Hays, and C.M. Davis
- Subjects
010302 applied physics ,Materials science ,Ionic radius ,Condensed matter physics ,Heisenberg model ,02 engineering and technology ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,Condensed Matter Physics ,01 natural sciences ,Magnetic susceptibility ,Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials ,Crystallography ,Formula unit ,0103 physical sciences ,Antiferromagnetism ,Orthorhombic crystal system ,0210 nano-technology ,Hydrate ,Monoclinic crystal system - Abstract
The magnetic properties of little examined CuCl 2 ·2D 2 O are studied and compared with those of CuCl 2 ·2H 2 O. New CuBr 2 ·6H 2 O is also examined. Susceptibility maxima appear for chlorides at 5.35 and 5.50 K, in the above order, with estimated antiferromagnetic ordering at 4.15 and 4.25 K. Curie-Weiss fits yield g of 2.210 and 2.205, and Weiss θ of −6.0 and −4.7 K, respectively, in χ M = C/(T − θ). One-dimensional Heisenberg model fits to susceptibilities, including interchain exchange in a mean-field approximation, are performed. Interchain exchange is significant but much weaker than intrachain. The bromide hexahydrate strongly differs magnetically from any chloride hydrate, but exhibits notable similarities and differences compared to previously studied CuBr 2 . A broad susceptibility maximum occurs near 218 K, only 4% lower than for CuBr 2 , but with almost twice the magnitude. Powder X-ray diffraction data for CuBr 2 ·6H 2 O may be best accounted for by a monoclinic unit cell that is metrically orthorhombic. The volume per formula unit is consistent with trends in metal ionic radii. However, an alternative monoclinic cell with 5% smaller volume more readily rationalizes the magnetism.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF