Back to Search Start Over

Magnetism of CuCl 2 ·2D 2 O and CuCl 2 ·2H 2 O, and of CuBr 2 ·6H 2 O

Authors :
Michael J. Wagner
A.S. Hampton
M.J. Van Dongen
C.H. Komatsu
N.S. Benday
Gary C. DeFotis
Kevin A. Hays
C.M. Davis
Source :
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 434:23-29
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2017.

Abstract

The magnetic properties of little examined CuCl 2 ·2D 2 O are studied and compared with those of CuCl 2 ·2H 2 O. New CuBr 2 ·6H 2 O is also examined. Susceptibility maxima appear for chlorides at 5.35 and 5.50 K, in the above order, with estimated antiferromagnetic ordering at 4.15 and 4.25 K. Curie-Weiss fits yield g of 2.210 and 2.205, and Weiss θ of −6.0 and −4.7 K, respectively, in χ M = C/(T − θ). One-dimensional Heisenberg model fits to susceptibilities, including interchain exchange in a mean-field approximation, are performed. Interchain exchange is significant but much weaker than intrachain. The bromide hexahydrate strongly differs magnetically from any chloride hydrate, but exhibits notable similarities and differences compared to previously studied CuBr 2 . A broad susceptibility maximum occurs near 218 K, only 4% lower than for CuBr 2 , but with almost twice the magnitude. Powder X-ray diffraction data for CuBr 2 ·6H 2 O may be best accounted for by a monoclinic unit cell that is metrically orthorhombic. The volume per formula unit is consistent with trends in metal ionic radii. However, an alternative monoclinic cell with 5% smaller volume more readily rationalizes the magnetism.

Details

ISSN :
03048853
Volume :
434
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........6cd15bd1dcfa111e1afb6f7a7c2e9bf9
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.03.030