Search

Although the effectiveness of screening for lung cancer remains controversial, it is a fact that most lung cancers are diagnosed at an advanced stage outside of lung cancer screening programs. In 2013, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force revised its lung cancer screening recommendation, now supporting lung cancer screening by low-dose computed tomography in patients at high risk. This is also endorsed by many major medical societies and advocacy group stakeholders, albeit with different eligibility criteria. In Europe, population-based lung cancer screening has so far not been recommended or implemented, as some important issues remain unresolved. Among them is the open question of how enlarging pulmonary nodules detected in lung cancer screening should be managed. This article comprises two parts: a review of the current lung cancer screening approaches and the potential therapeutic options for enlarging pulmonary nodules, followed by a meeting report including consensus statements of an interdisciplinary expert panel that discussed the potential of the different therapeutic options., (Copyright © 2017 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Several mechanisms of acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in EGFR-mutated NSCLC have been described including the T790M mutation and MET amplification. Whereas T790M mutation confers prolonged survival and sensitivity to 3rd generation TKIs, data are lacking on clinical features and outcome of MET-driven resistant EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients., Methods: Patients with metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC displaying high MET overexpression or MET amplification, detected on a biopsy performed after progression on EGFR TKI, were identified in 15 centers. Clinical and molecular data were retrospectively collected., Results: Forty two patients were included. The median overall survival (OS), and the median post EGFR TKI progression overall survival (PPOS) were 36.2 months [95%CI 27.3-66.5] and 18.5 months [95%CI 10.6-27.4] respectively. Nineteen out of 36 tumors tested for MET FISH had MET amplification. A T790M mutation was found in 11/41 (26.8%) patients. T790M-positive patients had a better OS than T790M-negative patients (p=0.0224). Nineteen patients received a MET TKI. Objective response was reported in 1 out of 12 evaluable patients treated with a MET inhibitor as a single agent and in 1 of 2 patients treated with a combination of MET and EGFR TKIs., Conclusion: MET-driven resistance to EGFR TKI defines a specific pattern of resistance characterized by low objective response rate to MET inhibitors given alone and overlapping with T790M mutations. Further studies are warranted to define adequate therapeutic strategies for MET-driven resistance to EGFR TKI., Competing Interests: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST A B. Cortot reported conflicts of interest with : Astra-Zeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Roche, Novartis, BMS, MSD, Pfizer Simon Baldacci reported conflicts of interest with : Lilly, GSK, Pfizer, Roche Nicolas Girard reported conflicts of interest with : Astra-Zeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Roche, Novartis, BMS, MSD, Pfizer Clarisse Audigier-Valette reported conflicts of interest with : Astra-Zeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Roche, Novartis, BMS, MSD, Pfizer Florian Guisier reported conflicts of interest with : Boehringer-Ingelheim, BMS

Objectives: The REVEL study demonstrated improved efficacy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with ramucirumab plus docetaxel, independent of histology. This exploratory analysis characterized the treatment effect in REVEL patients who were refractory to prior first-line treatment., Materials and Methods: Refractory patients had a best response of progressive disease to first-line treatment. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), quality of life (QoL), and safety. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed for OS and PFS, and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used for response. QoL was assessed with the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale. Sensitivity analyses were performed on subgroups of the intent-to-treat population with limited time on first-line therapy., Results: Of 1253 randomized patients in REVEL, 360 (29%) were refractory to first-line treatment. Baseline characteristics were largely balanced between treatment arms. In the control arm, median OS for refractory patients was 6.3 versus 10.3 months for patients not meeting this criterion, demonstrating the poor prognosis of refractory patients. Median OS (8.3 vs. 6.3 months; HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.68-1.08), median PFS (4.0 vs. 2.5 months; HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57-0.88), and ORR (22.5% vs. 12.6%) were improved in refractory patients treated with ramucirumab compared to placebo, without new safety concerns or further deteriorating patient QoL., Conclusions: The effect of ramucirumab in refractory patients is similar to that in the intent-to-treat population. The benefit/risk profile for refractory patients suggests that ramucirumab plus docetaxel is an appropriate treatment option even in this difficult-to-treat population., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Ramucirumab, a recombinant human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, increased overall survival (OS) combined with docetaxel versus docetaxel alone in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the REVEL trial. Pre-specified exploratory analysis examined efficacy and safety by histology., Materials and Methods: 1253 patients with NSCLC were randomized to receive ramucirumab (10mg/kg; n=628) plus docetaxel (75mg/m 2 ) or placebo plus docetaxel (n=625) after disease progression on or after platinum-based therapy, with or without bevacizumab or maintenance therapy. OS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained using an unstratified Cox proportional hazards model. Primary quality-of-life analysis was time to deterioration (TtD) of the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) scores using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression., Results: Median OS for adenocarcinoma was 11.2 months for ramucirumab-docetaxel (n = 377) and 9.8 months for placebo-docetaxel (n=348); HR=0.83 (95% CI: 0.69-0.99). In squamous disease, median OS was 9.5 months for ramucirumab-docetaxel (n=157) versus 8.2 months for placebo-docetaxel (n=171); HR 0.88 (95% CI: 0.69-1.13). Median OS for other nonsquamous was 10.8 months for ramucirumab-docetaxel (n=74) and 9.3 months for placebo-docetaxel (n=78); HR=0.86 (95% CI: 0.59-1.26). Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between treatment arms across histologic subgroups. TtD for LCSS scores was similar between treatment arms in the nonsquamous and squamous subgroups., Conclusion: REVEL demonstrated similar favorable efficacy and manageable safety for ramucirumab-docetaxel across histologic subgroups of NSCLC., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Alectinib, a highly selective inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), has shown systemic and central nervous system (CNS) efficacy in the treatment of ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated alectinib as compared with crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, including those with asymptomatic CNS disease., Methods: In a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 303 patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC to receive either alectinib (600 mg twice daily) or crizotinib (250 mg twice daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary end points were independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival, time to CNS progression, objective response rate, and overall survival., Results: During a median follow-up of 17.6 months (crizotinib) and 18.6 months (alectinib), an event of disease progression or death occurred in 62 of 152 patients (41%) in the alectinib group and 102 of 151 patients (68%) in the crizotinib group. The rate of investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly higher with alectinib than with crizotinib (12-month event-free survival rate, 68.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 61.0 to 75.9] with alectinib vs. 48.7% [95% CI, 40.4 to 56.9] with crizotinib; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.65]; P<0.001); the median progression-free survival with alectinib was not reached. The results for independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival were consistent with those for the primary end point. A total of 18 patients (12%) in the alectinib group had an event of CNS progression, as compared with 68 patients (45%) in the crizotinib group (cause-specific hazard ratio, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.28; P<0.001). A response occurred in 126 patients in the alectinib group (response rate, 82.9%; 95% CI, 76.0 to 88.5) and in 114 patients in the crizotinib group (response rate, 75.5%; 95% CI, 67.8 to 82.1) (P=0.09). Grade 3 to 5 adverse events were less frequent with alectinib (41% vs. 50% with crizotinib)., Conclusions: As compared with crizotinib, alectinib showed superior efficacy and lower toxicity in primary treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; ALEX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02075840 .).

Immunotherapy is becoming a standard of care for many cancers. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can generate immune-related adverse events. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) has been identified as a rare but potentially severe event.Between December 2015 and April 2016, we conducted a retrospective study in centres experienced in ICI use. We report the main features of ICI-ILD with a focus on clinical presentation, radiological patterns and therapeutic strategies.We identified 64 (3.5%) out of 1826 cancer patients with ICI-ILD. Patients mainly received programmed cell death-1 inhibitors. ILD usually occurred in males, and former or current smokers, with a median age of 59 years. We observed 65.6% grade 2/3 severity, 9.4% grade 4 severity and 9.4% fatal ILD. The median (range) time from initiation of immunotherapy to ILD was 2.3 (0.2-27.4) months. Onset tended to occur earlier in lung cancer versus melanoma: median 2.1 and 5.2 months, respectively (p=0.02). Ground-glass opacities (81.3%) were the predominant lesions, followed by consolidations (53.1%). Organising pneumonia (23.4%) and hypersensitivity pneumonitis (15.6%) were the most common patterns. Overall survival at 6 months was 58.1% (95% CI 37.7-73.8%).ICI-ILD often occurs early and displays suggestive radiological features. As there is no clearly identified risk factor, oncologists need to diagnose and adequately treat this adverse event., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: Disclosures can be found alongside this article at erj.ersjournals.com, (Copyright ©ERS 2017.)

Nivolumab, an anti PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor has demonstrated efficacy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after failure to standard chemotherapy. Standard chemotherapy agents could promote antitumor immune response. We thus examined whether the response to first line chemotherapy could impact on nivolumab benefit. One hundred and 15 patients with NSCLC were included in this retrospective study from 4 different French centers. Forty-three squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), and 72 non-SCC received nivolumab between 2015 and 2016 (3 mg/kg IV Q2W). Response to first-line chemotherapy and to nivolumab was retrospectively assessed on CT-scan by central review. The association between RECIST response to first-line chemotherapy and nivolumab efficacy were determined using Fisher's exact test and Cox proportional hazard model. Respectively 46 (40%), 44 (38%) and 25 (22%) patients experienced partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD) in response to first-line platinum- based chemotherapy. Twenty 5 (21%), 34 (30%), 56 (49%) respectively experienced PR, SD and PD in response to nivolumab. 60% (54/90) of patients who experienced clinical benefit (PR + SD) after first-line chemotherapy also had clinical benefit after nivolumab, while only 20% (5/25) of patients with initial PD subsequently experienced clinical benefit with nivolumab (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.001). The type of first-line doublet chemotherapy did not influence the response rate to nivolumab. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that patients with clinical benefit from first-line chemotherapy had higher second-line PFS ( P = 0.003) (median PFS on nivolumab of 5, 3.3 and 1.9 months for patients with PR, SD and PD in response to first-line therapy, respectively). Similar results were obtained for OS. Thus this study suggests that the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy may be a valuable surrogate marker of the benefit of nivolumab in terms of PFS and OS.

Ten to 29% of lung cancers might be linked to occupational factors but 60% of them are not compensated. The PROPOUMON project aimed to improve the identification, recognition and compensation of occupational lung cancer as occupational disease using a self-administered questionnaire (AQREP). One objective was to assess the AQREP, comparing it with the questionnaire drawn up by the French Language Pneumology Society (Q-SPLF). From March 2014 to September 2015, 90 lung cancer patients treated at the Centre Léon-Bérard responded to the AQREP and Q-SPLF. The two physicians in charge of the consultation assessed independently whether or not a consultation was indicated. A certificate for the compensation process was proposed when a suspicion of high or average imputability was identified. Analysis of the questionnaires was concordant for 73% of the patients. The AQREP has a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 73%. Its positive and negative predictive values were 62 and 82%. The information provided by 24 patients were discordant between questionnaires. In two patients with discordant evaluation (AQREP+/Q-SPLF-; AQREP-/Q-SPLF+), one Initial Medical Certificate (IMC) was written. This study made it possible to conclude that AQREP is relevant for the identification of potentially occupational lung cancers. Collegial discussion of complex cases might be considered. The project is currently been extended to other centers and to lymphoma., (Copyright © 2017 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Overall survival (OS) with the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor (ALKi) crizotinib in a large population of unselected patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not documented. We sought to assess OS with crizotinib in unselected ALK-positive NSCLC patients and whether post-progression systemic treatments affect survival outcomes.ALK-positive NSCLC patients receiving crizotinib in French expanded access programs or as approved drug were enrolled. We collected clinical and survival data, RECIST-defined progressive disease (PD) and post-PD systemic treatment efficacy. We performed multivariable analysis of OS from crizotinib initiation and PD under crizotinib.At time of analysis, 209 (65.7%) of the 318 included patients had died. Median OS with crizotinib was 16.6 months. The line of crizotinib therapy did not impact survival outcomes. Of the 263 patients with PD, 105 received best supportive care, 74 subsequent drugs other than next-generation ALKi and 84 next-generation ALKi. Next-generation ALKi treatment correlated with better survival outcomes in multivariate analysis. These patients had a median post-PD survival of 25.0 months and median OS from metastatic disease diagnosis of 89.6 months.Unselected ALK-positive NSCLC patients achieve good survival outcomes with crizotinib therapy. Next-generation ALKi may provide survival improvement after PD under crizotinib.

Over the past few years, there have been considerable advances in the treatments available to patients with metastatic or locally advanced NSCLC, particularly those who have progressed during first-line treatment. Some of the treatment options available to patients are discussed here, with a focus on checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) and antiangiogenic agents (bevacizumab, ramucirumab, and nintedanib). It is hypothesized that combining immunotherapy with antiangiogenic treatment may have a synergistic effect and enhance the efficacy of both treatments. In this review, we explore the theory and potential of this novel treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC. We discuss the growing body of evidence that proangiogenic factors can modulate the immune response (both by reducing T-cell infiltration into the tumor microenvironment and through systemic effects on immune-regulatory cell function), and we examine the preclinical evidence for combining these treatments. Potential challenges are also considered, and we review the preliminary evidence of clinical efficacy and safety with this novel combination in a variety of solid tumor types., (Copyright © 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Alectinib is a highly selective second-generation ALK inhibitor that is active against most crizotinib ALK resistance mutations, with a good penetration in CNS and a good safety profile. Thanks to the positive results of Phase II trials, alectinib was approved in Japan and by the US FDA for ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients pretreated with crizotinib. Recently, the Phase III J-ALEX study demonstrated superiority of alectinib over crizotinib in crizotinib naive ALK-positive NSCLC, with an impressive improvement of progression-free survival. From the results and those expected of Phase III ALEX study, alectinib might become the frontline treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC. This article summarizes the therapeutic options in ALK-positive advanced NSCLC, and the chemical, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, metabolism and clinical efficacy of alectinib.

Despite the efficacy of a number of first-line treatments, most patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experience disease progression that warrants further treatment. In this review, we examine the role of novel active agents for patients who progress after first-line therapy and who are not candidates for targeted therapies. More therapeutic options are needed for the management of patients with NSCLC after failure of first-line chemotherapy. A PubMed search was performed for articles from January 2012 to May 2015 using the keywords NSCLC, antiangiogenic, immunotherapy, second-line, novel therapies and English language articles only. Relevant papers were reviewed; papers outside that period were considered on a case-by-case basis. A search of oncology congresses was performed to identify relevant abstracts over this period. In recent years, antiangiogenic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been added to our armamentarium to treat patients with advanced NSCLC who have progressed on first-line chemotherapy. These include nintedanib, a triple angiokinase inhibitor; ramucirumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 antibody; and nivolumab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab, just three of a growing list of antibodies targeting the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)/PD ligand-1 pathway. Predictive and prognostic factors in NSCLC treatment will help to optimise treatment with these novel agents. The approval of new treatments for patients with NSCLC after the failure of first-line chemotherapy has increased options after a decade of few advances, and holds promise for future evolution of the management of NSCLC., Competing Interests: Competing interests: FC has received advisory board and/or lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Clovis Oncology. LC has received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca. RD has received advisory board and/or lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis and Clovis Oncology. DE is a consultant for ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, Golden Biotech, Helsinn Therapeutics and Sandoz. DF has received consultant fees from Eli Lilly and speaker bureau fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb. KK has received advisory board and/or lecture fees from Eli Lilly, Roche, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, Clovis Oncology, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck Sharpe & Dohme. TLC has received advisory board and/or lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi and Synta. NL is a researcher for the University Health Network, which received a research grant from Novartis. CM has received honoraria for expert study advice and travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim. MP has received research grants from Novartis and honoraria from Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer and Clovis Oncology. LP-A has given scientific advice to Pfizer, Clovis Oncology, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Bristol-Myers Squibb. MP has received honoraria for advisory boards from Eli Lilly, Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim. RP has received speaker's fees and honoraria for advisory boards from Boehringer Ingelheim, and honoraria for data safety monitoring board membership from Synta Pharmaceuticals, and Merck Sharpe & Dohme. EQ participated in clinical trials involving nivolumab, pembrolizumab, nintedanib, ramucirumab and ganetespib. MR has received compensated consultant fees from Hoffmann-La Roche, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim and Samsung, and honoraria for lectures from Hoffmann-La Roche, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Boehringer Ingelheim. ES has received honoraria for participating in advisory boards and lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. EV has received consultant/advisory fees from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, Eli Lilly, GeneCentric, Genentech, Merck, Synta, Transgene and VentiRx. CZ has received honoraria from Hoffmann-La Roche, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim and AstraZeneca.

Squamous cell lung cancer (sqCLC) is an aggressive form of cancer that poses many therapeutic challenges. Patients tend to be older, present at a later stage, and have a high incidence of comorbidities, which can compromise treatment delivery and exacerbate toxicity. In addition, certain agents routinely available for nonsquamous cell histologic subtypes, such as bevacizumab and pemetrexed, are contraindicated or lack efficacy in sqCLC. Therapeutic progress has been much slower for advanced sqCLC, with median survival times of approximately 9 to 11 months in most studies. Herein, we discuss the current therapeutic landscape for patients with sqCLC versus with nonsquamous NSCLC. Current evidence indicates that new targeted treatments, notably monoclonal antibodies such as ramucirumab and necitumumab, and immunotherapies such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab can provide survival prolongation, although the benefits are still relatively modest. These incremental improvements, all realized since 2012, in aggregate, will very likely have a clinically meaningful impact for patients with sqCLC. We also discuss recent genomic studies of sqCLC that have identified potentially actionable molecular targets, as well as the relevant targeted agents in clinical development. Finally, we discuss the magnitude of survival benefit and the risk-to-benefit ratio that would prove clinically meaningful in this underserved patient population with unmet needs., (Copyright © 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Angiogenesis is critical for tumor growth, proliferation and metastasis with the crucial role of Vascular Endothelial Growth factor (VEGF) pathway. Ramucirumab is a monoclonal antibody that specifically targets the extracellular domain of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2. Areas covered: We performed a search on Medline to browse the current literature on Ramucirumab and anti-angiogenic agents, for the treatment of NSCLC. The REVEL study demonstrated a significant improvement of response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival by adding ramucirumab to docetaxel compared to docetaxel plus a placebo in second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer, irrespective of histology, with an acceptable safety profile. This article has for objective to summarize efficacy and safety data of the use of ramucirumab in combination with docetaxel in second line in NSCLC. Expert commentary: REVEL constitutes the first significant advance in second-line setting for patients eligible to anti-angiogenic therapy. The landscape of post-platinum therapy in NSCLC is considerably evolving and the role of ramucirumab or other anti-angiogenic agents as nintedanib in this setting has to be discussed for each patient with other available treatment options, among which immune checkpoints inhibitors, as well as the best treatment sequence.

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. NSCLC accounts for more than 85% of all lung cancers, and the prognosis for advanced-stage disease is typically poor. In recent years, the importance of histologic subtypes of NSCLC has been recognized, and the distinction between squamous and other NSCLC histologic subtypes is now critical to patient management. Squamous cell lung cancer (sqCLC) represents approximately 25% to 30% of NSCLC. The prognosis for patients with advanced NSCLC is poorer for those with sqCLC than for those with adenocarcinoma. This is partly due to a number of clinical characteristics that distinguish sqCLC from other NSCLC histologic subtypes, such as smoking history, comorbid diseases, age, and molecular profile. Together, these factors make sqCLC an especially challenging disease to manage. Herein, we review some of the key clinicopathologic features of sqCLC. Understanding these features to optimally address many of the unique therapeutic challenges of this disease is likely to be central to ultimately improving outcomes for patients with squamous NSCLC., (Copyright © 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is recommended to assess the vulnerability of elderly patients, but its integration in cancer treatment decision making has never been prospectively evaluated. Here, in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we compared a standard strategy of chemotherapy allocation on the basis of performance status (PS) and age with an experimental strategy on the basis of CGA., Patients and Methods: In a multicenter, open-label, phase III trial, elderly patients ≥ 70 years old with a PS of 0 to 2 and stage IV NSCLC were randomly assigned between chemotherapy allocation on the basis of PS and age (standard arm: carboplatin-based doublet if PS ≤ 1 and age ≤ 75 years; docetaxel if PS = 2 or age > 75 years) and treatment allocation on the basis of CGA (CGA arm: carboplatin-based doublet for fit patients, docetaxel for vulnerable patients, and best supportive care for frail patients). The primary end point was treatment failure free survival (TFFS). Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, tolerability, and quality of life., Results: Four hundred ninety-four patients were randomly assigned (standard arm, n = 251; CGA arm, n = 243). Median age was 77 years. In the standard and CGA arms, 35.1% and 45.7% of patients received a carboplatin-based doublet, 64.9% and 31.3% received docetaxel, and 0% and 23.0% received best supportive care, respectively. In the standard and CGA arms, median TFFS times were 3.2 and 3.1 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.1), and median OS times were 6.4 and 6.1 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.1). Patients in the CGA arm, compared with standard arm patients, experienced significantly less all grade toxicity (85.6% v 93.4%, respectively P = .015) and fewer treatment failures as a result of toxicity (4.8% v 11.8%, respectively; P = .007)., Conclusion: In elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, treatment allocation on the basis of CGA failed to improve the TFFS or OS but slightly reduced treatment toxicity., (© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Objectives: REVEL demonstrated that ramucirumab+docetaxel (RAM+DTX) improved overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate in patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with progression after platinum-based chemotherapy. This analysis examined quality of life (QoL) as assessed by the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) and clinician-reported functional status., Materials and Methods: The LCSS includes 6 symptom and 3 global items measured on a 0-100-mm scale; higher scores represent greater symptom burden. LCSS and ECOG PS data were collected at baseline, every 3-week cycle, the summary visit, and at the 30-day follow-up. LCSS total score and Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) were calculated. The primary analysis compared time to deterioration (TtD) between treatment arms for all individual items and summary scores, defined as increase from baseline by ≥ 15 mm using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. TtD to ECOG PS ≥ 2 was analyzed., Results: There were 1253 patients randomized to receive RAM+DTX or placebo+docetaxel (PL+DTX). Across all assessments, LCSS compliance was approximately 75% and balanced across arms. The mean (SD) baseline LCSS total score was 27.3mm (17.08 mm) on RAM+DTX and 29.6mm (17.59 mm) on PL+DTX. At 30-day follow-up, mean (SD) LCSS total score was 32.0 (19.03) on RAM+DTX and 32.5 (19.87) on PL+DTX. The TtD for all LCSS scores was similar between treatment arms. Stratified HRs (95% CI) for LCSS total score and ASBI were HR=0.99 (0.81, 1.22), p=0.932 and HR=0.93 (0.75, 1.15), p=0.514 with approximately 70% of patients censored. TtD to PS ≥ 2 was similar between treatment arms (HR=1.03 [95% CI: 0.85, 1.26], p=0.743) with approximately two-thirds of the patients censored., Conclusion: In addition to improvement of clinical efficacy outcomes demonstrated in REVEL, these results suggest that adding ramucirumab to docetaxel did not impair patient QoL, symptoms, or functioning., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Plasma circulating cell-free (cf)DNA is of interest in oncology because it has been shown to contain tumour DNA and may thus be used as liquid biopsy. In nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), cfDNA quantification has been proposed for the monitoring and follow-up of patients. However, available studies are limited and need to be confirmed by studies with larger sample sizes and including patients who receive more homogenous treatments. Our objective was to assess the predictive and prognostic value of plasma cfDNA concentration in a large series of patients with NSCLC and treated with a standard chemotherapy regimen.We included samples from lung cancer patients recruited into the Pharmacogenoscan study. The cfDNA of 218 patients was extracted and quantified by fluorometry before and after two or three cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. The association between baseline and post-chemotherapy concentrations and treatment response, assessed by RECIST (response evaluation criteria in solid tumours) or patient survival was analysed.Patients with high cfDNA concentrations (highest tertile) at baseline had a significantly worse disease-free and overall survival than those with lower concentrations (lowest and middle tertiles) (median overall survival 10 months (95% CI 10.7-13.9) versus 14.2 months (95% CI 12.6-15.8), respectively; p=0.001). In multivariate analysis, increased baseline concentration of cfDNA was an independent prognostic factor. However, we did not find any association between cfDNA concentration and response to treatment.cfDNA may be a biomarker for the assessment of prognosis in NSCLC. However, total concentration of cfDNA does not appear to predict chemotherapy response., (Copyright ©ERS 2015.)

Purpose: The phase II prospective, noncomparative BRAIN study (NCT00800202) investigated efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in chemotherapy-naïve or pretreated patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and asymptomatic untreated brain metastases to provide data in this previously unexplored subgroup., Experimental Design: Patients with stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and untreated, asymptomatic brain metastases received first-line bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) plus carboplatin (area under the curve ×6) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks (B + CP), or second-line bevacizumab plus erlotinib (150 mg/d; B + E). Six-month progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. The trial could be stopped if there were more than three (B + CP) or more than two (B + E) intracranial hemorrhages., Results: In first-line B + CP cohort (n = 67), 6-month PFS rate was 56.5% with a median PFS of 6.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.7-7.1] and median overall survival (OS) of 16.0 months. Investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) was 62.7%: 61.2% in intracranial lesions and 64.2% in extracranial lesions. Because of low enrolment (n = 24), efficacy results for the second-line B + E cohort were exploratory only; 6-month PFS rate was 57.2%, median PFS was 6.3 months (95% CI, 3.0-8.4), median OS was 12.0 months, and ORR was 12.5%. Adverse events were comparable with previous trials of bevacizumab. One grade 1 intracranial hemorrhage occurred and resolved without sequelae., Conclusions: The BRAIN study demonstrates encouraging efficacy and acceptable safety of bevacizumab with first-line paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with NSCLC and asymptomatic, untreated brain metastases., (©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: The IFCT-GFPC 0502 phase III study reported prolongation of progression-free survival with gemcitabine or erlotinib maintenance vs. observation after cisplatin-gemcitabine induction chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This analysis was undertaken to assess the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of these strategies for the global population and pre-specified subgroups., Methods: A cost-utility analysis evaluated the ICER of gemcitabine or erlotinib maintenance therapy vs. observation, from randomization until the end of follow-up. Direct medical costs (including drugs, hospitalization, follow-up examinations, second-line treatments and palliative care) were prospectively collected per patient during the trial, until death, from the primary health-insurance provider's perspective. Utility data were extracted from literature. Sensitivity analyses were conducted., Results: The ICERs for gemcitabine or erlotinib maintenance therapy were respectively 76,625 and 184,733 euros per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Gemcitabine continuation maintenance therapy had a favourable ICER in patients with PS = 0 (52,213 €/QALY), in responders to induction chemotherapy (64,296 €/QALY), regardless of histology (adenocarcinoma, 62,292 €/QALY, non adenocarcinoma, 83,291 €/QALY). Erlotinib maintenance showed a favourable ICER in patients with PS = 0 (94,908 €/QALY), in patients with adenocarcinoma (97,160 €/QALY) and in patient with objective response to induction (101,186 €/QALY), but it is not cost-effective in patients with PS =1, in patients with non-adenocarcinoma or with stable disease after induction chemotherapy., Conclusion: Gemcitabine- or erlotinib-maintenance therapy had ICERs that varied as a function of histology, PS and response to first-line chemotherapy.

Background: Ramucirumab is a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that targets the extracellular domain of VEGFR-2. We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of treatment with docetaxel plus ramucirumab or placebo as second-line treatment for patients with stage IV non-small-cell-lung cancer (NSCLC) after platinum-based therapy., Methods: In this multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial (REVEL), we enrolled patients with squamous or non-squamous NSCLC who had progressed during or after a first-line platinum-based chemotherapy regimen. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) with a centralised, interactive voice-response system (stratified by sex, region, performance status, and previous maintenance therapy [yes vs no]) to receive docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and either ramucirumab (10 mg/kg) or placebo on day 1 of a 21 day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal, or death. The primary endpoint was overall survival in all patients allocated to treatment. We assessed adverse events according to treatment received. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01168973., Findings: Between Dec 3, 2010, and Jan 24, 2013, we screened 1825 patients, of whom 1253 patients were randomly allocated to treatment. Median overall survival was 10·5 months (IQR 5·1-21·2) for 628 patients allocated ramucirumab plus docetaxel and 9·1 months (4·2-18·0) for 625 patients who received placebo plus docetaxel (hazard ratio 0·86, 95% CI 0·75-0·98; p=0·023). Median progression-free survival was 4·5 months (IQR 2·3-8·3) for the ramucirumab group compared with 3·0 months (1·4-6·9) for the control group (0·76, 0·68-0·86; p<0·0001). We noted treatment-emergent adverse events in 613 (98%) of 627 patients in the ramucirumab safety population and 594 (95%) of 618 patients in the control safety population. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (306 patients [49%] in the ramucirumab group vs 246 [40%] in the control group), febrile neutropenia (100 [16%] vs 62 [10%]), fatigue (88 [14%] vs 65 [10%]), leucopenia (86 [14%] vs 77 [12%]), and hypertension (35 [6%] vs 13 [2%]). The numbers of deaths from adverse events (31 [5%] vs 35 [6%]) and grade 3 or worse pulmonary haemorrhage (eight [1%] vs eight [1%]) did not differ between groups. Toxicities were manageable with appropriate dose reductions and supportive care., Interpretation: Ramucirumab plus docetaxel improves survival as second-line treatment of patients with stage IV NSCLC., Funding: Eli Lilly., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Despite the rising number of lung cancers recognized as occupational disease, occupational lung cancers are still under-reported. To improve the recognition of occupational lung cancer, we implemented at the Léon-Bérard Cancer Centre, a questionnaire-based process to identify occupational exposures in these patients and improve compensation. Between January 2010 and December 2011, 91 lung cancer patients responded to a questionnaire. An "occupational cancer" consultation was proposed to patients reporting exposure to carcinogens or jobs with risk of exposure. Fifty-one patients were seen in consultation (34 following the questionnaire and 17 directly addressed by the oncologist). A suspicion of high or average imputability was identified in 31 (60.8%) patients and a compensation process seemed possible for 27 (61.4%). Asbestos was the most common carcinogen identified. Among 17 compensation processes engaged, 12 succeeded and one is ongoing. The complexity of the administrative process seems to be an obstacle for patients and perpetuates inequality. The implementation of our approach increased the identification and the compensation of occupational lung cancer. Our approach responds to the objectives of the National Cancer Plan and helps to improve the overall care of patients with cancer. This approach has been awarded by the national label in 2011 "Year of the patients and their rights".

Introduction: Maintenance therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might lead to resistance to subsequent treatments. IFCT-GFPC 0502 study showed a progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with gemcitabine or erlotinib maintenance compared with observation after cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy. The trial included a pre-defined pemetrexed second-line therapy, allowing post-hoc assessment of its efficacy according to previous maintenance treatment or treatment-free interval., Methods: Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients were randomized after four cycles of cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy to either observation or to receive maintenance therapy with gemcitabine or erlotinib. Pemetrexed was given as second-line treatment on disease progression in all arms. PFS and overall survival (OS) were assessed from the beginning of pemetrexed therapy according to randomization arm., Results: Of the 464 randomized patients, 360 (78 %) received second-line pemetrexed (130 [84%], 114 [74%], and 116 [75%] in observation, gemcitabine, and erlotinib arm, respectively). Median number of pemetrexed cycles was 3 (1-40) in all arms. Median PFS did not differ between gemcitabine and observation arms (4.2 versus 3.9 months, hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81 [0.62-1.06]) or between erlotinib and observation arms (4.2 versus 3.9 months, HR 0.83 [0.64-1.09]). OS data showed a non-significant improvement with gemcitabine arm versus observation arm (8.3 versus 7.5 months, HR 0.81 [0.61-1.07]) or erlotinib arm versus observation arm (9.1 versus 7.5 months, HR 0.80 [0.61-1.05]). Results were similar for non-squamous patients. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were comparable in all arms., Conclusions: Maintenance therapy with gemcitabine continuation or erlotinib does not seem to impair efficacy of second-line pemetrexed comparatively to administration after a treatment-free interval.

This survey, conducted in Rhône-Alpes region (France), aims to better understand the actual conditions of practice in thoracic oncology. A questionnaire was distributed to all oncologists, pulmonologists, radiotherapy physicians and thoracic surgeons in the region. Of 401 questionnaires, the response rate was 56%. Among the responders 46% reported exercising the Thoracic Oncology (TO). Most physicians practicing TO are pulmonologists (62%). The majority (45%) are engaged in secondary hospital or university hospital (27%). However, practitioners with the most important activity exerts in university hospitals and cancer centre (71% of physicians practicing in secondary hospitals and 75% of those in private practice reported to manage fewer than 80 new NSCLC cases per year in structure). Furthermore, 91% are regularly involved in a multidisciplinary team. Radiation oncologist, pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons are assiduous to these meeting; however radiologists and, to a lesser extent, pathologists are less attentive. Moreover, 92% of practitioners belong to cancer networks. Similarly, over one third of working together in a cooperative clinical research institution and nearly half are involved in clinical trials (with nearly half in secondary hospital). These results highlight the reality of practice in Rhône-Alpes and will serve as the basis for coordinating authorities to correct dysfunctions or monitor certain activities of interest (clinical trials)., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

This survey, conducted in region Rhône-Alpes (France), aims to assess some data in thoracic oncology practice including availability of specialized equipments. This study is based on a questionnaire mailed to oncologists and pulmonologists in the region. Of 401 questionnaires, the response rate was 56%. Responses of 71 (20%) physicians practicing thoracic oncology are presented in this article. Eighty percent of physicians routinely screen occupational exposure in case of lung cancer. The oncologists are less likely than pulmonologists to screen it (50% vs. 12%, p = 0.0015). Sixty-one percent of practitioners do not routinely propose smoking cessation in stage IV. Sixty-nine percent of practitioners' reports obtain an appointment for PET-scanner within 15 days and 72% indicate that this equipment is located within 50 km of their place of practice. Sixty-two percent reports using a surgical team specialized in chest disease, which is located in their city in 77% of cases. Sixty-one percent say that the period between the decision of an emergency radiotherapy and the start of it is less than one week. In 73% radiotherapy department is located in their city of practice. Forty-one percent of practitioners say they have a centralized and specialized preparation unit for cancer drugs. It seems that specialized equipment in Rhône-Alpes is adapted to practice with the exception of units dedicated to the preparation of cytotoxic drugs.

Standard treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer is based on several lines of therapy separated by treatment-free intervals in which each new line is started when tumour progression is detected. The maintenance strategy consists of pursuing an appropriate, well-tolerated treatment after the end of first-line chemotherapy in order to maintain the initial therapeutic benefit and to avoid rapid clinical deterioration that would rule out further treatment. Two kinds of maintenance therapy have been investigated: continuation maintenance which consists in continuing a targeted agent or a chemotherapy agent that was part of initial induction therapy and switch maintenance defined by initiating a new agent immediately after the end of induction chemotherapy. Clinical trials show that maintenance strategy provides a significant benefit in terms of disease control and improves overall survival for switch maintenance with pemetrexed or erlotinib. Survival benefit appears to be due mainly to the progression-free survival gain and to the increase in the proportion of patients who can receive several lines of treatment. Maintenance therapy is an important option for patients receiving first-line treatment, particularly for those with rapid disease progression. The choice of continuation or switch maintenance will depend on drug used in combination to platinum for induction treatment, response to first-line, histology and patient's preference., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) and adenocarcinoma with bronchioloalveolar features (ADC-WBF) belong to the same anatomo-clinical entity and show very similar epidemiologic, clinical and biological characteristics. However there is a lack of consensus for the treatment of unresectable forms. Although epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and paclitaxel do have some efficacy, the aim of this review is to assess the role that pemetrexed, a new generation antifolate, could play in this context. Pemetrexed has proved to be particularly effective in advanced lung adenocarcinomas and unresectable mesotheliomas, and cases of major and sustained responses of ADC-WBF to pemetrexed have been reported. The preclinical rationale explaining this efficacy is that it inhibits the growth of BAC cell lines in vitro. BAC tumors overexpress FR-alpha, a protein involved in pemetrexed intracellular transport, at rates higher than those observed in lung adenocarcinomas and mesotheliomas and it would seem that pemetrexed efficacy is correlated to FR-alpha expression. The role played by thymidylate synthase expression level in sensitivity to pemetrexed also needs to be specifically explored in ADC-WBF. The results of two phase II trials, SWOG 0526 and IFCT 05-04, will hopefully provide decisive information on the relevance of pemetrexed in ADC-WBF management and the molecular predictors of response.

Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) and adenocarcinoma mixed subtype with bronchioloalveolar features (ADC-WBF) represent a unique anatomo-clinical entity accounting for some 20% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). These tumors seem less sensitive to chemotherapy than other NSCLC. We report two cases of advanced ADC-WBF treated with second-line and fourth-line pemetrexed. Major and durable radiological response associated with clinical and functional improvement was achieved in both patients, without important drug toxicity. After treatment arrest, the two patients experienced progressive disease but responded to retreatment with pemetrexed. Recent data suggest that paclitaxel-based chemotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors could be an acceptable therapeutic strategy in unresectable CBA and ADC-WBF. The cases reported here and preclinical findings suggest a therapeutic efficacy of pemetrexed in these tumors. Prospective studies are required to evaluate this hypothesis.

Inhibition of specific processes essential for tumour vascular development is one of the key strategies for the treatment of non- small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Many agents target the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) pathway, either by preventing VEGF receptor binding or inhibiting VEGF receptor signalling in endothelial cells. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody specific for VEGF-A. Combination of bevacizumab with standard first-line chemotherapy in NSCLC leads to an improvement in response rates and progression-free survival compared to chemotherapy alone and a significant survival advantage with carboplatin- paclitaxel chemotherapy. Toxicity issues are of concern with the possible occurrence of hypertension and an increased risk of arterial thrombo-embolism. The occurrence of fatal pulmonary haemorrhage after necrosis of the primary tumour is a specific toxicity in NSCLC which requires appropriate selection of patients before treatment; excluding squamous cell carcinoma, haemorrhagic tumours and tumour invasion of major blood vessels. The use of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy represent a first step in the development of antiangiogenic treatments in NSCLC, with the future possibility of using it in earlier stages of disease.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays an important role in non-small cell lung cancer growth. Small molecules can specifically target the tyrosine kinase activity of the EGFR's intracellular domain and thus inhibit downstream pathways influencing cell proliferation and survival. Gefitinib and erlotinib have been developed as single-agents for the treatment of patients who have relapsed following one or more courses of chemotherapy. Erlotinib has exhibited significant overall survival benefit in a second- or third-line setting compared to placebo for unselected patients. A beneficial effect on survival has been observed in almost all subgroups of patients and the response rate was higher in women, non-smokers, Asian patients and patients with adenocarcinoma. Somatic mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of EGFR have been shown to be strong predictive markers for drug response to gefitinib or erlotinib and led to a new insight into adenocarcinoma carcinogenesis. High EGFR gene copy number seems to be predictive of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors-related effect on survival observed in second- or third-line treatment. Future use of EFGR tyrosine kinase inhibitors should be based on improved clinical and molecular selection of patients who are likely to derive the greatest benefit from these drugs, especially in first-line setting.

Inhibition of specific processes essential for tumour vascular development is actually one of the key strategies for treatment of lung cancer, for which angiogenesis is consistently predictive of a poor prognosis. The most promising agents target the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway, either by preventing VEGF-receptor binding as bevacizumab or inhibiting downstream receptor signaling in endothelial cells. Combination of bevacizumab with standard first-line chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer demonstrates a significant survival advantage comparing to chemotherapy alone, which provides the "proof of concept" for inhibition of angiogenesis in lung cancer. Development of small molecules inhibiting tyrosine kinase activity of VEGF-receptors is ongoing; many of them showed a single-agent activity but their most likely use will be in combination with chemotherapy or biological agents. Toxicity issues are of concern with the occurrence of fatal pulmonary hemorrhage after cavitation and necrosis of primary tumour, which requires appropriate selection of patients before treatment. A better understanding of the complex process of angiogenesis and of surrogate markers of treatment effect will improve our ability to design more effective therapies.

The development of new anticancer agents specifically targeting the molecular processes involved in carcinogenesis is a major step forward in the treatment of patients with lung cancer. Preclinical models often show a cytostatic mechanism of action and predict an improved toxicity profile compared to traditional cytostatic drugs. This means that a standard development design based upon tumour shrinkage is not appropriate for these agents. The development of targeted therapies requires a new model for clinical phase I and II trials, with careful selection of patients who might benefit from treatment and adapted endpoints to establish that growth inhibition can be translated into a clinical benefit. Some targeted agents may have been discarded because of the use of inappropriate traditional endpoints during their development. A greater investment with additional implementation of correlative translational and pharmacodynamic studies during early development is crucial before going to phase III trials.

Treatment of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is based upon chemotherapy, with several meta-analyses showing an improvement of survival compared to supportive care alone. For first-line chemotherapy, the development of new third generation drugs (vinorelbine, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docétaxel) with a better therapeutic index has led to the definition of 4 to 6 cycles of a platinum-based dual agent regime as standard therapy for performance stage (PS) 0-1 patients, producing a 1-year survival in the region of 35%. The choice of agents is based upon the differences in the toxicity profile of platinum-based combinations and on patient co-morbidities. For frail patients (PS>2 and elderly patients), single-agent chemotherapy seems more appropriate than cisplatin-based combinations; carboplatin or non-platinum combinations might be more effective. Third generation cytotoxic agents have modestly improved survival for patients with stage IV NSCLC but should probably provide an increased number of long-term survivors.

Both fundamental and clinical studies suggest that class III beta-tubulin expression is associated with resistance to taxanes and constitutes a prognostic factor in several solid tumors. In this study, we assessed the prognostic and predictive value of class III beta-tubulin in tumors of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with paclitaxel-based or other regimens that did not include tubulin-binding agents. Expression of class III beta-tubulin was examined immunohistochemically in 91 tumor samples obtained before treatment from patients with stage III and IV NSCLC, including 47 who received paclitaxel-based regimens and 44 who received regimens without tubulin-binding agents. Response to chemotherapy, progression-free survival, and overall survival were correlated with the expression of class III beta-tubulin protein. The response rate was 37.5% (16 responses among 45 evaluable patients) among patients receiving paclitaxel. Patients whose tumors expressed low levels of class III beta-tubulin isotype had a better response rate, longer progression-free survival, and overall survival (P < 0.001, 0.004, and 0.002, respectively), whereas this variable was not found to be predictive in patients receiving regimens without tubulin-binding agents. A multivariate analysis taking into account sex, age, histology, stage, and class III beta-tubulin confirmed that low-level class III beta-tubulin expression was independently correlated with progression-free survival (P = 0.003) and overall survival (P = 0.003). These findings suggest that the expression levels of class III beta-tubulin in tumor cells is predictive of response to therapy and patient outcome in patients with NSCLC receiving paclitaxel-based chemotherapy but is not a general prognostic factor in this patient population.

Purpose: Our main goal was to evaluate a panel of molecular markers for the detection of cancer cells in serous effusions and to determine their value as an adjunctive reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) test to cytologic examination., Experimental Design: One hundred fourteen serous effusions from 71 patients with tumors and 43 patients with benign diseases were subjected to RT-PCR for expression of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), epithelial cell adhesion molecule (Ep-CAM), E-cadherin, mammaglobin, mucin 1 (MUC1) isoforms MUC1/REP, MUC1/Y, and MUC1/Z, calretinin, and Wilms' tumor 1 susceptibility gene., Results: CEA, Ep-CAM, E-cadherin, and mammaglobin were specifically expressed in malignant effusions. The sensitivity of RT-PCR in cytologically negative malignant effusions was 63.1% combining CEA and Ep-CAM (with 100% specificity) and reached 78.9% adding MUC1/Y or MUC1/Z (with 93% specificity). In the whole population of effusions, the combination of cytology with RT-PCR of CEA and Ep-CAM yielded a 90.1% sensitivity, a specificity and a positive predictive value of 100%, and a 86% negative predictive value for malignancy. Adding MUC1/Y or MUC1/Z to the panel, the sensitivity was 94.5% with 93% specificity, 95.7% PPV, and 90.9% negative predictive value. Moreover, CEA and mammaglobin were specifically expressed in epithelial malignancies, and mammaglobin was mainly expressed in effusions from breast carcinoma (97.3% of specificity)., Conclusions: A combination of cytology and RT-PCR analysis of CEA and Ep-CAM significantly improved the detection sensitivity of tumor cells in serous effusions. RT-PCR analysis of CEA, Ep-CAM, and mammaglobin in serous effusions could be a beneficial adjunct to cytology for the diagnosis of malignancy.

Purpose: We conducted a phase III study to compare the survival impact of concurrent versus sequential treatment with radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Patients and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment arms. In the sequential arm, patients received induction CT with cisplatin (120 mg/m2) on days 1, 29, and 57, and vinorelbine (30 mg/m2/wk) from day 1 to day 78, followed by thoracic RT at a dose of 66 Gy in 33 fractions (2 Gy per fraction and 5 fractions per week). In the concurrent arm, the same RT was started on day 1 with two concurrent cycles of cisplatin 20 mg/m2/d and etoposide 50 mg/m2/d (days 1 to 5 and days 29 to 33); patients then received consolidation therapy with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on days 78 and 106 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2/wk from days 78 to 127., Results: Two hundred five patients were randomly assigned. Pretreatment characteristics were well balanced between the two arms. There were six toxic deaths in the sequential arm and 10 in the concurrent arm. Median survival was 14.5 months in the sequential arm and 16.3 months in the concurrent arm (log-rank test P = .24). Two-, 3-, and 4-year survival rates were better in the concurrent arm (39%, 25%, and 21%, respectively) than in the sequential arm (26%, 19%, and 14%, respectively). Esophageal toxicity was significantly more frequent in the concurrent arm than in the sequential arm (32% v 3%)., Conclusion: Although not statistically significant, clinically important differences in the median, 2-, 3-, and 4-year survival rates were observed, with a trend in favor of concurrent chemoradiation therapy, suggesting that is the optimal strategy for patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

Resistance to gemcitabine is likely to be multifactorial and could involve a number of mechanisms involved in drug penetration, metabolism and targeting. In vitro studies of resistant human cell lines have confirmed that human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1)-deficient cells display resistance to gemcitabine. Overexpression of certain nucleotidases, such as cN-II, has also been frequently shown in gemcitabine-resistant models. In this study, we applied immunohistochemical methods to assess the protein abundance of cN-II, hENT1, human concentrative nucleoside transporter 3 (hCNT3) and deoxycitidine kinase (dCK) in malignant cells in from 43 patients with treatment-naïve locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). All patients subsequently received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Response to chemotherapy, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were correlated with abundance of these proteins. Among the 43 samples, only 7 (16%) expressed detectable hENT1, with a low percentage of positive cells, 18 expressed hCNT3 (42%), 36 (86%) expressed cN-II and 28 (66%) expressed dCK. In univariate analysis, only cN-II expression levels were correlated with overall survival. None of the parameters were correlated with freedom from progression survival nor with response. Patients with low levels of expression of cN-II (less than 40% positively stained cells) had worse overall survival than patients with higher levels of cN-II expression (6 months and 11 months, respectively). In a multivariate analysis taking into account age, sex, weight loss, stage and immunohistochemical results, cN-II was the only predictive factor associated with overall survival. This study suggests that cN-II nucleotidase expression levels identify subgroups of NSCLC patients with different outcomes under gemcitabine-based therapy. Larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm the predictive value of cN-II in these patients.

Purpose: To determine the prevalence and the prognostic value of microtubule component expression in tumors of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Experimental Design: Expression of microtubular components was immunohistochemically examined in 93 tumor samples from untreated patients with stage III and IV NSCLC. All patients received vinorelbine-based chemotherapy. Response to chemotherapy, progression-free survival, and overall survival were correlated with the expression of microtubule proteins., Results: The response rate was 27.3% (21 partial responses among 77 valuable patients). Although expression of microtubule components was not associated with the response rate, high class III beta-tubulin expression was correlated with resistance to vinorelbine, defined as disease progression under treatment. Patients whose tumors expressed high levels of class III beta-tubulin isotype had shorter progression-free survival and overall survival (P = 0.002 and 0.001, respectively). High Delta2 alpha-tubulin expression was associated with a shorter overall survival (P = 0.018). Tubulin II levels were not found to be correlated with patient outcome. A multivariate analysis, taking into account sex, age, histology, stage, weight loss, and class II beta-tubulin, class III beta-tubulin, and Delta2 alpha-tubulin levels, confirmed that class III beta-tubulin expression was independently correlated with progression-free survival (P = 0.04) and overall survival (P = 0.012)., Conclusions: These findings suggest that a high level of expression of class III beta-tubulin in tumor cells is associated with resistance to vinorelbine and a poor prognosis in patients with NSCLC receiving vinorelbine-based chemotherapy.

The first-line treatment of non-small cell bronchial cancers at the metastatic stage relies on chemotherapy, the impact of which, in terms of survival in comparison with palliative care alone, has been confirmed by several meta-analyses. The recent development of new drugs (vinorelbine, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel) that benefit from an improved efficacy-toxicity ratio, has led to the individualisation, as treatment standard in patients in a general state of good health, of bitherapies based on the combination of a platinum salt and recent active drugs. The latter exhibit similar efficacy, in terms of response and survival, providing PS 0 or 1 patients with a median survival of around 8 months and, at 1 year, nearing 35%. The choice of the first-line therapy in a given patient will be based essentially on the differences in toxicity profiles among the therapeutic regimens, taking into account the frequent co-morbidities in this population, the modalities of administration and the perspectives of second-line therapy. The patients with an altered general state of health (PS 2) will benefit from adapted treatment based on active monotherapy or bitherapy without cisplatin. The prolongation of the first-line therapy over and above 4 cycles following maximal reduction of the tumour does not provide enhanced survival and considerably increases toxicity. The recent cytotoxic agents appear to provide a real progress, although modest in the treatment of metastatic NSCBC, progress which is visible considering the proportion of patients still living in the long term.