Search

There is limited information about the initiation of triple therapy (TT) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in primary care. This was an observational, population-based study in patients identified from a primary care electronic medical records database in Catalonia from 2011 to 2015 aimed to identify the use of TT in patients with newly diagnosed COPD. A total of 69,668 newly diagnosed patients were identified of whom 11,524 (16.5%) initiated TT, of whom 8626 initiated TT at or immediately after COPD diagnosis. Among them, 72.3% were GOLD A/B, 14.6% were frequent exacerbators, and 7.1% had asthma-COPD overlap (ACO). Variables associated with TT initiation were: male sex, older age, previous exacerbations, ACO, a previous treatment regimen containing an inhaled corticosteroid, previous pneumonia, and history of lung cancer. A significant number of COPD patients in Primary Care initiated TT shortly after or even before an established COPD diagnosis.

Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is a significantly under-diagnosed genetic condition caused by reduced levels and/or functionality of alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT), predisposing individuals to lung, liver or other systemic diseases. The management of individuals with the PI*MZ genotype, characterized by mild or moderate AAT deficiency, is less clear than of those with the most common severe deficiency genotype (PI*ZZ). Recent genetic data suggest that the PI*MZ genotype may be significantly more prevalent than currently thought. The only specific treatment for lung disease associated with severe AATD is the intravenous infusion of AAT augmentation therapy, which has been shown to slow disease progression in PI*ZZ individuals. There is no specific evidence for the clinical benefit of AAT therapy in PI*MZ individuals, and the risk of emphysema development in this group remains controversial. As such, current guidelines do not support the use of AAT augmentation in PI*MZ individuals. Here, we discuss the limited data on the PI*MZ genotype and offer pro and con perspectives on pursuing an AAT-specific therapeutic strategy in PI*MZ individuals with lung disease. Ultimately, further research to demonstrate the safety, risk/benefit balance and efficacy of AAT therapy in PI*MZ individuals is needed.

[Background] The global prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has increased markedly in recent decades. Given the scarcity of resources available to address global health challenges and respiratory medicine being relatively under-invested in, it is important to define research priorities for COPD globally. In this paper, we aim to identify a ranked set of COPD research priorities that need to be addressed in the next 10 years to substantially reduce the global impact of COPD., [Methods] We adapted the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) methodology to identify global COPD research priorities., [Results] 62 experts contributed 230 research ideas, which were scored by 34 researchers according to six pre-defined criteria: answerability, effectiveness, feasibility, deliverability, burden reduction, and equity. The top-ranked research priority was the need for new effective strategies to support smoking cessation. Of the top 20 overall research priorities, six were focused on feasible and cost-effective pulmonary rehabilitation delivery and access, particularly in primary/community care and low-resource settings. Three of the top 10 overall priorities called for research on improved screening and accurate diagnostic methods for COPD in low-resource primary care settings. Further ideas that drew support involved a better understanding of risk factors for COPD, development of effective training programmes for health workers and physicians in low resource settings, and evaluation of novel interventions to encourage physical activity., [Conclusions] The experts agreed that the most pressing feasible research questions to address in the next decade for COPD reduction were on prevention, diagnosis and rehabilitation of COPD, especially in low resource settings. The largest gains should be expected in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) settings, as the large majority of COPD deaths occur in those settings. Research priorities identified by this systematic international process should inform and motivate policymakers, funders, and researchers to support and conduct research to reduce the global burden of COPD.

Introduction: Control status may be a useful tool to assess response to treatment at each clinical visit in COPD. Control status has demonstrated to have long-term predictive value for exacerbations, but there is no information about the short-term predictive value of the lack of control and changes in control status over time. Method: Prospective, international, multicenter study aimed at describing the short-term (6 months) prognostic value of control status in patients with COPD. Patients with COPD were classified as controlled/uncontrolled at baseline and at 3,6-month follow-up visits using previously validated criteria of control. Moderate and severe exacerbation rates were compared between controlled and uncontrolled visits and between patients persistently controlled, uncontrolled and those changing control status over follow-up. Results: A total of 267 patients were analyzed: 80 (29.8%) were persistently controlled, 43 (16%) persistently uncontrolled and 144 (53.7%) changed control status during follow-up. Persistently controlled patients were more frequently men, with lower (not increased) body mass index and higher FEV1(%). During the 6 months following an uncontrolled patient visit the odds ratio (OR) for presenting a moderate exacerbation was 3.41 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.47–4.69) and OR = 4.25 (95%CI 2.48–7.27) for hospitalization compared with a controlled patient visit. Conclusions: Evaluation of control status at each clinical visit provides relevant prognostic information about the risk of exacerbation in the next 6 months. Lack of control is a warning signal that should prompt investigation and action in order to achieve control status.

Although chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are well-characterized diseases, they can coexist in a given patient. The term asthma–COPD overlap (ACO) was introduced to describe patients that have clinical features of both diseases and may represent around 25% of COPD patients and around 20% of asthma patients. Despite the increasing interest in ACO, there are still substantial controversies regarding its definition and its position within clinical guidelines for patients with obstructive lung disease. In general, most definitions indicate that ACO patients must present with non-reversible airflow limitation, significant exposure to smoking or other noxious particles or gases, together with features of asthma. In patients with a primary diagnosis of COPD, the identification of ACO has therapeutic implication because the asthmatic component should be treated with inhaled corticosteroids and some studies suggest that the most severe patients may respond to biological agents indicated for severe asthma. This manuscript aims to summarize the current state-of-the-art of ACO. The definitions, prevalence, and clinical manifestations will be reviewed and some innovative aspects, such as genetics, epigenetics, and biomarkers will be addressed. Lastly, the management and prognosis will be outlined as well as the position of ACO in the COPD and asthma guidelines.

Marc Miravitlles,1 Alexandra Solé,2 Helena Aguilar,3 Ana Ampudia,2 Jaume Costa-Samarra,4 Maria Mallén-Alberdi,4 Diana Nieves4 1Pneumology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, CIBER for Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Barcelona, Spain; 2Market Access Department of Boehringer Ingelheim SA, Barcelona, Spain; 3Medical Department of Boehringer Ingelheim SA, Barcelona, Spain; 4Oblikue Consulting SL, Barcelona, SpainCorrespondence: Marc MiravitllesPneumology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, P. Vall d’Hebron 119-129, Barcelona, 08035, SpainEmail marcm@separ.esObjective: The objective of this study was to assess the non-adherence level of Spanish clinical practice to guideline recommendations for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to estimate the potential impact on pharmaceutical expenditure resulting from transitioning current treatment patterns according to guidelines.Methods: A model was developed to compare current prescribing patterns with two alternative scenarios: the first aligned with the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD 2020) recommendations, and the second with the Spanish Guidelines for COPD (GesEPOC 2017). Current treatment practice was obtained from publications that describe treatment patterns by pulmonology departments in Spain. The economic impact between patterns was calculated from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System (NHS), considering the annual pharmacological costs of COPD inhaled maintenance therapy. Two additional analyses were performed: one that included current prescribing patterns of patients managed by pulmonology and primary care centers in Spain (published aggregated data); and another that only considered the appropriate use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) treatment according to guidelines.Results: It was es

Cristina Martinez-González,1 Ignacio Blanco,2 Isidro Diego,3 Patricia Bueno,4 Marc Miravitlles5 1Pulmonology Department, University Central Hospital of Asturias, Universidad de Oviedo, Instituto de Investigación del Principado de Asturias (ISPA), Oviedo, Spain; 2Alpha1-Antitrypsin Deficiency Spanish Registry (REDAAT), Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR), Barcelona, Spain; 3Materials and Energy Department, School of Mining Engineering, Oviedo University, Oviedo, Spain; 4Internal Medicine Department, County Hospital of Jarrio, Jarrio, Spain; 5Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron/Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Barcelona, SpainCorrespondence: Marc MiravitllesPneumology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Pg. Vall d’Hebron 119-129, Barcelona, 08035, SpainEmail marcm@separ.esBackground: The α-1 antitrypsin (AAT) protease inhibitor PiMZ is a moderately deficient genotype, until recently considered of little or negligible risk. However, a growing number of studies show that MZ carriers have an increased risk of developing lung and liver diseases, if exposed to smoking or other airborne or industrial pollutants, and hepatotoxic substances.Methods: We used the epidemiological studies performed to determine the frequencies of PiM and PiZ worldwide, based on the following criteria: 1) samples representative of the general population; 2) AAT phenotyping or genotyping characterized by adequate methods, including isoelectric focusing and polymerase chain reaction; and 3) studies with reliable results assessed with a coefficient of variation calculated from the sample size and 95% confidence intervals, to measure the precision of the results in terms of dispersion of the data around the mean.Results: The present review reveals an impressive number of MZs of more than 35 million in 74 countries of the world with avai

Bernardino Alcázar-Navarrete,1,2 Francisco García-Rio,2,3 Guadalupe Sánchez,4 Esther Mariscal,5 Andrea García,5 Maribel Cuesta,6 Estefany Uría,6 Marc Miravitlles2,7 1Respiratory Department. Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain; 2CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; 3Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain; 4Medical Department, GSK, Madrid, Spain; 5Market Access Department, GSK, Madrid, Spain; 6Oblikue Consulting, Barcelona, Spain; 7Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Vall D’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, SpainCorrespondence: Francisco García-RioHospital Universitario La Paz, Idipaz, Paseo de la Castellana, 261, Madrid, 28046, SpainTel +34 917 27 70 00Email fgr01m@gmail.comBackground: The cost of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Spain has been studied from different perspectives, but parameters such as the patient’s phenotype have seldom been considered. Our aim was to describe the disease burden of COPD patients with frequent exacerbator phenotype, treated with triple therapy.Methods: An observational, multicenter study was carried out from December 2017 to November 2018 in pulmonology services among patients ≥ 40 years with COPD confirmed diagnosis receiving triple therapy (ICS/LAMA/LABA) and history of ≥ 2 moderate or ≥ 1 severe exacerbation in the 12 months prior to the inclusion visit. COPD-related healthcare resources were collected over a 12-months period prior to the inclusion visit: pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments, medical and ER visits, hospitalizations, tests and productivity loss. Costs were updated to € 2019. Patients were classified according to blood eosinophil levels: < 150 cells/μL and ≥ 150 cells/μL.Results: A total of 306 patients were included (77.1% men), with mean age of 69.9 years. Mean COPD exacerbation rate was 2.5/patient/year and 51.3% of p

Rachel Pullen, 1, 2 Marc Miravitlles, 3 Anita Sharma, 4 Dave Singh, 5 Fernando Martinez, 6 John R Hurst, 7 Luis Alves, 8, 9 Mark Dransfield, 10 Rongchang Chen, 11 Shigeo Muro, 12 Tonya Winders, 13 Christopher Blango, 14 Hana Muellerova, 15 Frank Trudo, 16 Paul Dorinsky, 17 Marianna Alacqua, 15, 18 Tamsin Morris, 19 Victoria Carter, 1, 2 Amy Couper, 1, 2 Rupert Jones, 20 Konstantinos Kostikas, 1, 21 Ruth Murray, 1 David B Price 1, 2, 22 1Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore; 2Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK; 3Pneumology Dept, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Barcelona, Spain; 4Platinum Medical Centre, Chermside, QLD, Australia; 5Division of Infection, Immunity & Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; 6New York-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; 7UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK; 8EPI Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; 9Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal; 10Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Lung Health Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; 11Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease of Shenzhen, Shenzhen Institute of Respiratory Disease, Shenzhen People’s Hospital (Second Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, First Affiliated Hospital of South University of Science and Technology of China), Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China; 12Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan; 13USA & Global Allergy & Airways Patient Platform, Vienna, Austria; 14Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 15Astra