301. [Untitled]
- Author
-
Daniel C. O'Connell and Cynthia M. Upchurch
- Subjects
Good-morning ,Linguistics and Language ,Presidential system ,Statement (logic) ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Innocence ,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology ,Deception ,Language and Linguistics ,Law ,Rhetoric ,Sociology ,Religious studies ,Grand jury ,Press conference ,General Psychology ,media_common - Abstract
Ten excerpts of both President Clinton's Grand Jury Testimony of August 17, 1998 and of each of two interviews with Hillary Rodham Clinton (Today Show, January 27, 1998; Good Morning America, January 28, 1998) were analyzed. In all of them, the topic under discussion was the President's insistence on his innocence in the Lewinsky case. Comparisons between the President and First Lady revealed long and short within-speaker pauses, respectively. His replies to questions average more than twice the length of hers. Comparisons were also made with other speech genres, including modern presidential inaugural rhetoric. In particular, President Clinton's statement of his innocence at the conclusion of an educational press conference on January 26, 1998 and his prepared statement at the beginning of his Grand Jury Testimony were found to vary notably from all the other corpora. Both are characterized by several of Ekman's (1985, p. 286) behavioral cues for the detection of deception.
- Published
- 2000
- Full Text
- View/download PDF