Wen, Zhiwei, Xiao, Yusen, Jia, Tao, Li, Yong, Wu, Yuxian, Li, Shulong, Cui, Yajing, Chen, Yongliang, Cheng, Cuihua, and Zhao, Yong
• We successfully prepared FeSe and a series of Fe 1- x Cu x Se 0.4 Te 0.6 (x = 0, 0.005, 0.01 and 0.015) single crystals and observed a linear relationship between the content of Cu and T c. By utilizing the strong suppression of superconducting transition temperature by Cu, a comparative system with FeSe was constructed to elucidate the physical origin of the second peak effect in FeSe 0.4 Te 0.6. • The substitution of Cu effectively weakens the normal state magnetic background signal, indicating a decrease in the content of the interstitial iron upon Cu substitution. Furthermore, this leads to a reduction in the second peak effect. Additionally, a significant reduction in the anisotropy of the critical current density is observed. • Studies on magnetic flux dynamics reveal that the reduction in interstitial iron caused by Cu doping leads to a decrease in the dynamic relaxation rate. Furthermore, the crossover between fast and slow magnetic flux relaxations is observed near the second peak effect. • Fitting of pinning force density and normalized critical current density curves for the series of single crystals indicates that even though the superconducting transition temperature is consistent, the types of pinning centers in Fe 1- x Cu x Se 0.4 Te 0.6 and FeSe are inconsistent, and a more complex pinning mode exists in Fe 1- x Cu x Se 0.4 Te 0.6. • The final fitting of the upper critical field for the FeSe and series of Fe 1- x Cu x Se 0.4 Te 0.6 (x = 0, 0.005, 0.01 and 0.015) single crystals revealed that the H c2 of the two types of crystals is limited by different mechanisms. This paper presents the preparation and comparative study of the superconducting properties and magnetic flux dynamics of FeSe and Fe 1- x Cu x Te 0.6 Se 0.4 (x = 0, 0.005, 0.01, 0.015) single crystals, with the aim of investigating the origin of the second peak in FeTe 0.6 Se 0.4. The Cu element significantly suppresses the superconducting transition temperature (T c) of Fe 1- x Cu x Te 0.6 Se 0.4 from 14.5 K at x = 0 to 9.23 K at x = 0.015, which is close to the 9 K of FeSe, while also suppressing the second peak effect. Additionally, the critical current density anisotropy (γ) is reduced. Dynamic relaxation rates (Q) indicate a crossover from rapid single-vortex pinning near the second peak to collective pinning, linking fast and slow magnetic flux relaxation with the second peak effect. By comparing the pinning properties of FeSe and Fe 1- x Cu x Te 0.6 Se 0.4 (x = 0, 0.005, 0.01, 0.015), it is found that the second peak effect is closely related to the transition from δ l - pinning to δT c - pinning in Fe 1- x Cu x Se 0.4 Te 0.6 (x = 0, 0.005, 0.01, 0.015). While surface pinning centers dominate in FeSe, the pinning in Fe 1- x Cu x Se 0.4 Te 0.6 (x = 0, 0.005, 0.01, 0.015) originates from the interaction between the core and normal centers. Furthermore, the electronic transport properties of the FeSe and Fe 1- x Cu x Se 0.4 Te 0.6 (x = 0, 0.005, 0.01, 0.015) series are also studied. Te substitution suppresses the nematic transition in FeSe, while Cu substitution suppresses the superconducting transition in Fe 1- x Cu x Se 0.4 Te 0.6 (x = 0, 0.005, 0.01, 0.015) and reduces the residual resistivity. Additionally, the upper critical field is reduced from 150 T in FeSe 0.4 Te 0.6 to 41 T in Fe 0.085 Cu 0.015 Se 0.4 Te 0.6 , but still higher than the 12.5 T observed in FeSe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]