Search

Simple Summary: The prognostic significance of metastatic sites, and immediate cause of death in MTC patients with distant metastasis remains unclear. In this study, we calculated the time from metastasis to death, and we found that long-term oncologic outcomes were differ from initial metastatic site; the hazard ratio for bone metastatic sites (HR: 5.42; p = 0.044) and multisite metastasis (HR: 6.11; p = 0.006) were significantly higher than for lung metastasis. Complications due to the progression of distant metastasis were the most common cause of death, followed by complications related to chemotherapy and airway obstruction. Distant metastasis is a poor prognostic factor in medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), but the significance of differentiating the characteristics according to the site of distant metastasis remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and long-term oncologic outcomes in MTC patients with distant metastasis. We identified 46 MTC patients with distant metastasis between 1994 and 2019. Clinical characteristics were compared based on the timing of the detection of distant metastasis. Additionally, survival rates following the detection of distant metastasis were evaluated to compare the clinical significance of metastatic site. The detailed causes of death were also investigated. Of the 46 patients, 15 patients (32.6%) had synchronous distant metastasis and 31 patients (67.4%) had metachronous distant metastasis. There was no clinical difference between these two groups except regarding initial surgical extent. The lung (52.2%) was the most common metastatic site, followed by the bone (28.3%), mediastinum (19.6%), liver (17.4%), adrenal gland (4.3%), brain (4.3%), kidney (2.2%), and pancreas (2.2%). Patients with bone metastasis and multisite metastasis had significantly worse prognoses than those with lung metastasis (hazard ratio: 5.42; p = 0.044 and hazard ratio: 6.11; p = 0.006). Complications due to the progression of distant metastasis, airway obstruction due to tracheal invasion, and complications related to chemotherapy were leading causes of death. In conclusion, there was no difference in clinical characteristics according to the timing of distant metastasis. Oncological outcomes differed by metastatic site. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

5 Miyamoto H. Intraoperative pathology consultation during urological surgery: Impact on final margin status and pitfalls of frozen section diagnosis. Keywords: cystectomy; frozen section; intraoperative pathology consultation; nephrectomy; oncologic outcome; orchiectomy; penectomy; prostatectomy; surgical margin EN cystectomy frozen section intraoperative pathology consultation nephrectomy oncologic outcome orchiectomy penectomy prostatectomy surgical margin 581 581 1 09/16/21 20210901 NES 210901 Intraoperative frozen section assessment (FSA) provides critical information to urologists for performing an optimal surgical procedure, wherein urologists sometimes change their surgical strategy based on the intraoperative situation; this information has led to improvements in patients' outcome.1-4 However, it is a highly challenging area for surgical pathologists because of incomplete clinical information, poor orientation, and unsatisfactory sample preparation owing to artifacts. Cystectomy, frozen section, intraoperative pathology consultation, nephrectomy, oncologic outcome, orchiectomy, penectomy, prostatectomy, surgical margin. [Extracted from the article]

Objectives/hypothesis: Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) has a non-negligible incidence in elderly patients. However, there is still no clear indication on the ideal treatment for early-intermediate glottic LSCC in this specific age group. Both surgical and nonsurgical approaches may be burdened by complications and sequelae that negatively impact patient's health. In this setting, carbon dioxide transoral laser microsurgery (CO 2 TOLMS) is a promising minimally invasive treatment option., Study Design: Retrospective case series in a single tertiary academic institution., Methods: Patients who underwent CO 2 TOLMS for Tis-T3 glottic LSCC from 1997 to 2017 were reviewed. Demographic, clinical, and tumor characteristics, as well as postoperative complications were recorded. Overall (OS), disease-specific (DSS), recurrence-free (RFS), laryngo-esophageal dysfunction free survivals (LEDFS), and organ preservation (OP) were calculated., Results: A total of 134 patients (mean age, 80 ± 4 years; median, 79; range, 75-93) were included in the study. Seven lesions were classified as pTis, 65 as pT1a, 22 as pT1b, 35 as pT2, and 5 as pT3. No treatment-related death was observed. Twenty-eight (20.9%) patients reported 10 surgical and 19 medical complications. Five-year OS, DSS, RFS, LEDFS, and OP were 68.9%, 95.4%, 79.5%, 66%, and 92.5%, respectively. Age and comorbidities were associated with OS and LEDFS. Advanced T categories were negatively correlated with OS, DSS, RFS, LEDFS, and OP. Age and comorbidities were not significant risk factors for complications., Conclusions: CO 2 TOLMS can be considered a valuable therapeutic approach for selected Tis-T3 glottic LSCC even in the elderly given its favorable oncologic outcomes and minimal aggressiveness., Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 132:135-141, 2022., (© 2021 The Authors. The Laryngoscope published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Anastomotic leak in patients with rectal cancer has the potential to cause worse oncologic outcomes in addition to major morbidity and mortality risk of this dreaded complication. Anatomic location of the rectal cancer determines the ability to perform a restorative operation and the height of the anastomosis in relation to the anal canal. Clinical staging dictates the need for neoadjuvant treatment (such as chemotherapy and radiation) which may also contribute to anastomotic leak risk. In addition to oncologic outcomes, anastomotic leak can impact bowel function, the need for permanent stoma, and long-term quality of life. This study will discuss special considerations for anastomotic leak prevention and clinical implications of this complication in patients with rectal cancer., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Robotic surgery has been taken as a new modality to surpass the technical limitations of conventional surgery. Here we aim to compare the oncologic outcomes of patients with rectal cancer receiving robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery., Methods: Data from patients diagnosed with rectal cancer between March 2011 and December 2018 were obtained for outcome assessment at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. All patients were separated into two groups: a robot group (patients receiving robotic surgery, n = 314) and a laparoscopy group (patients receiving laparoscopic surgery, n = 220). The primary endpoint was survival outcomes. The secondary endpoints were the general conditions of the operation, postoperative complications and pathological characteristics., Results: The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at years 1, 3 and 5 were 96.6%, 88.7%, and 87.7% vs. 96.7%, 88.1%, and 78.4%, and 98.6%, 80.2-, and 73.5% vs. 96.2-, 87.2-, and 81.1% in the robot and laparoscopy groups, respectively (P > 0.05). In the multivariable-adjusted analysis, robotic surgery was not an independent prognostic factor for OS and DFS (P = 0.925 and 0.451, respectively). With respect to the general conditions of the operation, patients in the robot group had significantly shorter operation times (163.5 ± 40.9 vs. 190.5 ± 51.9 min), shorter times to 1 st gas passing [2(1) vs. 3(1)d] and shorter hospital stay days [7(2) vs. 8(3)d] compared to those in the laparoscopy group (P < 0.01, respectively). After the operation, the incidence of short- and long-term complications in the robot group was significantly lower than that in the laparoscopy group (15.9% vs. 32.3%; P < 0.001), especially for urinary retention (1.9% vs. 7.3%; 0.6% vs. 4.1%, P < 0.05, respectively). With regard to pathological characteristics, TNM stages II and III were more frequently observed in the robot group than in the laparoscopy group (94.3% vs. 83.2%, P < 0.001). No significant difference were observed in lymph nodes retrieved, lymphovascular invasion and circumferential resection margin involvement between the two groups (P > 0.05, respectively)., Conclusions: This monocentre retrospective comparative cohort study revealed short-term advantages of robot-assisted rectal cancer resection but similar survival compared to conventional laparoscopy., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Despite recent improvements in diagnostic and surgical techniques in urological oncology, positive resection margin remains a significant concern for surgeons. Meanwhile, intraoperative pathology consultation with frozen section assessment (FSA), particularly for histological diagnosis of the lesions incidentally found or enlarged or sentinel lymph nodes, generally provides critical information which enables immediate decision making for optimal patient care. The intraoperative evaluation of surgical margins is also often requested, although there are some differences in its application between institutions and surgeons. Importantly, it remains to be determined whether intraoperative FSA indeed contributes to reducing the risk of final positive margins and thereby improving long-term patient outcomes. This review summarizes available data indicating the potential impact of FSA at the surgical margins during urological surgeries, including radical or partial cystectomy, partial nephrectomy, radical prostatectomy, penectomy, and orchiectomy. The accuracy and pitfalls of the intraoperative consultation/FSA diagnosis are also discussed., (© 2021 Japanese Society of Pathology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Purpose: Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy presents the standard treatment for early cervical cancer. Recently, studies have shown a superior oncological outcome for open versus minimal invasive surgery, however, the reasons remain to be speculated. This meta-analysis evaluates the outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to open hysterectomy. Risk groups including the use of uterine manipulators or colpotomy were created., Methods: Ovid-Medline and Embase databases were systematically searched in June 2020. No limitation in date of publication or country was made. Subgroup analyses were performed regarding the surgical approach and the endpoints OS and DFS., Results: 30 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Five prospective, randomized-control trials were included. Patients were analyzed concerning the surgical approach [open surgery (AH), laparoscopic surgery (LH), robotic surgery (RH)]. Additionally, three subgroups were created from the LH group: the LH high-risk group (manipulator), intermediate-risk group (no manipulator, intracorporal colpotomy) and LH low-risk group (no manipulator, vaginal colpotomy). Regarding OS, the meta-analysis showed inferiority of LH in total over AH (0.97 [0.96; 0.98]). The OS was significantly higher in LH low risk (0.96 [0.94; 0.98) compared to LH intermediate risk (0.93 [0.91; 0.94]). OS rates were comparable in AH and LH Low-risk group. DFS was higher in the AH group compared to the LH group in general (0.92 [95%-CI 0.88; 0.95] vs. 0.87 [0.82; 0.91]), whereas the application of protective measures (no uterine manipulator in combination with vaginal colpotomy) was associated with increased DFS in laparoscopy (0.91 [0.91; 0.95])., Conclusion: DFS and OS in laparoscopy appear to be depending on surgical technique. Protective operating techniques in laparoscopy result in improved minimal invasive survival., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Clinical evidence has proved that enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) can improve short-term clinical outcomes after various types of surgeries, but the long-term benefits have not yet been examined, especially with respect to cancer surgeries. Therefore, a systematic review of the current evidence was conducted., Methods: The Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched using the following key words as search terms: "ERAS" or "enhanced recovery" or "fast track", "oncologic outcome", "recurrence", "metastasis", "long-term outcomes", "survival", and "cancer surgery". The articles were screened using the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the data from the included studies were extracted and analyzed., Results: A total of twenty-six articles were included in this review. Eighteen articles compared ERAS and conventional care, of which, 12 studies reported long-term overall survival (OS), and only 4 found the improvement by ERAS. Four studies reported disease-free survival (DFS), and only 1 found the improvement by ERAS. Five studies reported the outcomes of return to intended oncologic treatment after surgery (RIOT), and 4 found improvements in the ERAS group. Seven studies compared high adherence to ERAS with low adherence, of which, 6 reported the long-term OS, and 3 showed improvements by high adherence. One study reported high adherence could reduce the interval from surgery to RIOT. Four studies reported the effect of altering one single item within the ERAS protocol, but the results of 2 studies were controversial regarding the long-term OS between laparoscopic and open surgery, and 1 study showed improvements in OS with restrictive fluid therapy., Conclusions: The use of ERAS in cancer surgeries can improve the on-time initiation and completion of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery, and the high adherence to ERAS can lead to better outcomes than low adherence. Based on the current evidence, it is difficult to determine whether the ERAS protocol is associated with long-term overall survival or cancer-specific survival.

Backgrounds/aims: Portal vein resection (PVR) with major hepatic resection can increase the rate of curative resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC). However, the oncologic role and safety of PVR is still debatable. This study aims to analyze PVR in terms of safety and therapeutic effectiveness., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 235 patients who had undergone major hepatic resection for HC with curative intent, including patients with PVR (PVR, n =35) consisting of PV invasion (PVR-A, n =9), No PV invasion (PVR-B, n =26); and patients without PVR (No PVR, n =200)., Results: There was no significant difference in the 30-day mortality or postoperative morbidity between PVR and No PVR (2.9% vs. 1.0%; p =0.394 and 34.3% vs. 35.0%; p =0.875). The rate of advanced HC (T3: 40% vs. 12%; p <0.001 and nodal metastasis: 60% vs. 28%; p <0.001) was higher in PVR compared to No PVR. There was no significant difference in the 5-year overall survival rates and disease-free survival between PVR-A vs. PVR-B vs. No PVR. In multivariate analysis, estimated blood loss >600 ml ( p =0.010), T3 diseases ( p =0.001), nodal metastasis ( p =0.001) and poor differentiation ( p =0.002) were identified as independent risk factors for survival., Conclusions: PVR does not increase postoperative mortality or morbidity. It showed a similar oncologic outcome, despite a more advanced disease state in patients with HC. Given these findings, PVR should be actively performed if necessary, after careful patient selection.

Background: Emerging data from multi-institutional and national databases suggest that robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy is safe and feasible for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Nevertheless, there are limited reports evaluating its safety and oncologic efficacy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy., Method: This is a retrospective study from the 2010-2016 National Cancer Database comparing the postoperative, pathological and long-term oncologic outcomes between robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy., Results: We identified 155 (5%) RPD and 3329 (95%) OPD following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The use of the robot increased from 3 cases in 2010 to 50 cases in 2016. RPD patients were more likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy and to be treated at academic centers. After adjustment, RPD was associated with a higher proportion of adequate lymphadenectomy, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy, decreased rate of prolonged length of stay, and similar 90-day mortality. There was no difference in median overall survival between RPD and OPD (25.6 months vs. 27.5 months, Log Rank p = 0.879). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates for RPD were 83%, 36% and 22% and for OPD were 86%, 38% and 22%. After adjustment, the use of robotic surgery was associated with similar overall survival compared to the open approach (HR 1.011, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.776-1.316)., Conclusions: Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, RPD is associated with similar short- and long-term mortality with the advantage of shorter length of stay, higher proportion of adequate lymphadenectomy and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Objectives/hypothesis: Hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a rare but aggressive malignancy, with low survival rates and high incidence of tumor and treatment-related morbidity. This study aims to analyze the long-term oncologic and functional outcomes of a large cohort of patients and to determine prognostic factors., Study Design: Retrospective cohort study., Methods: The records of all patients diagnosed with hypopharyngeal SCC and treated with curative intent at our tertiary referral center were reviewed. Patient and initial disease characteristics, features, and complications of primary treatment, recurrence patterns, and corresponding treatments and the oncologic and functional long-term outcome were determined., Results: For a total of 179 patients, primary radiotherapy (RT) was the predominant treatment modality (78%), whereas 22% underwent primary surgery. The median, 2-year, and 5-year overall survival (OS) for the study cohort were 47 months, 64% and 43%. The median survival after first and second relapse was 7 and 6 months, respectively. The 2 and 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 52% and 36%. The median RFS after first relapse and salvage treatment was 9 months. A nodal status of ≥cN2 (HR = 1.89, CI:1.21-3.05, P < .005) and any other primary tumor localization than pyriform sinus (HR = 1.60, CI: 1.04-2.42, P < .05) were identified as independent risk factors for shorter OS and RFS. Regarding functional outcome, the 2- and 5-year laryngectomy-free-survival was 55% and 37%, respectively., Conclusions: In this large cohort with long-term follow-up, any other primary tumor localization than pyriform sinus and a nodal status of ≥cN2 were identified as risk factors for reduced OS and RFS., Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E1543-E1549, 2021., (© 2020 American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society Inc, "The Triological Society" and American Laryngological Association (ALA).)

Purpose: We performed breast-conserving surgery (BCS) using periareolar incisions for cancers located far from the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) and examined if BCS via a periareolar incision maximized cosmesis and maintained oncologic safety. One of the most important goals of BCS is to improve cosmesis after surgery and quality of life, but the skin incision can affect cosmesis based on the tumor location., Methods: Fifty-five patients with breast cancers located far from the NAC underwent BCS via periareolar incisions between January 2017 and April 2018. If a sentinel lymph node biopsy was required, another skin incision was created in the axilla using the conventional technique. Medical records of patients were reviewed retrospectively., Results: The mean patient age was 48.1 ± 10.6 years. The mean tumor size was 1.8 ± 1.0 cm (range 0.2-4.5 cm) on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); the mean distance from the NAC to the tumor was 5.9 ± 1.9 cm (range 4.0-12.3 cm). Patients with cancers in the subareolar area were excluded even though the distance from the nipple was > 4 cm on MRI. Negative microscopic margins were obtained in all patients. There was no surgical complication such as seroma, bleeding, or infection. Re-operation was not needed. All patients received whole breast radiation therapy. After surgery and radiation therapy, periareolar incision scars were nearly invisible., Conclusion: For cancers located far from the NAC, BCS via periareolar incisions is feasible and leads to superior cosmesis in selective patients. Moreover, BCS seems oncologically safe, although long-term outcomes need to be evaluated.

Background/objective: Recent prospective studies have shown poorer oncologic outcomes following minimally invasive surgery, which has led many surgeons to deeply inspect their practices. We reviewed our experience and evaluated the results of radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer., Methods: This retrospective study included patients with early stage cervical cancer (Ia1 - IIa1) who were treated with radical hysterectomy from May 2006 to Dec 2016. Patients were divided into three groups according to the surgical approach: radical abdominal hysterectomy (RAH), laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH), and robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (RRH)., Results: Learning curves of each type of surgery were obtained using the cumulative sum method. Survival rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves. To analyze the learning curve of a single surgeon, 89 patients were selected from the whole population. Learning curves of each group showed two distinct phases. The minimum number of cases required to achieve surgical improvement were 16 in RAH, 13 in LRH, and 21 in RRH. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival did not vary between RAH and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (p = .828 and p = .757, respectively). However, when stratified by the phases of the learning curves, patients included in the early phase of MIS showed a poorer PFS (p = .014)., Conclusions: Surgical proficiency could significantly affect the oncologic outcome in MIS. A prospective study regarding sufficient surgical competence is necessary for elaborate analysis of the feasibility of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest and nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.)

Surgical techniques have evolved over the past few decades, and minimally invasive surgery has been rapidly adapted to become a preferred operative approach for treating colorectal diseases. However, many of the procedures remain a technical challenge for surgeons to perform laparoscopically, which has prompted the development of robotic platforms. Robotic surgery has been introduced as the latest advance in minimally invasive surgery. The present article provides an overview of robotic rectal surgery and describes many advances that have been made in the field over the past two decades. More specifically, the introduction of the robotic platform and its benefits, and the limitations of current robotic technology, are discussed. Although the main advantages of robotic surgery over conventional laparoscopy appear to be lower conversion rates and better surgical specimen quality, oncological and functional outcomes appear to be similar to those of other alternatives. Other potential benefits include earlier recovery of voiding and sexual function after robotic total mesorectal excision. Nevertheless, the costs and lack of haptic feedback remain the primary limitations to the widespread use of robotic technology in the field., Competing Interests: Conflicts of InterestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (© Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2020.)

Objective: To determine whether treatment of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) at a high-volume facility affects survival., Study Design: Retrospective database analysis., Setting: National Cancer Database (2004-2014)., Subjects and Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for sinonasal SCC from 2004 to 2014. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics and classification, resection margins, treatment regimen, and facility case-specific volume-averaged per year and grouped in tertiles as low (0%-33%), medium (34%-66%), and high (67%-100%)-were compared. Overall survival was compared with Cox proportional hazards regression analysis., Results: A total of 3835 patients treated for sinonasal SCC between 2004 and 2014 were identified. Therapeutic options included surgery alone (18.6%), radiotherapy (RT) alone (29.1%), definitive chemoradiation (15.4%), surgery with adjuvant RT (22.8%), and combinations (14.1%) of the aforementioned treatments. Patients who underwent surgery with adjuvant RT had better overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; P < .001; 95% CI, 0.63-0.86). As for treatment volume per facility, 7.4% of patients were treated at a low-volume center, 17.5% at a medium-volume center, and 75.1% at a high-volume center. Univariate analysis showed that treatment at a high-volume facility conferred a significantly better overall survival (HR, 0.77; P = .002). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, adjusting for age, sex, tumor classification, and treatment regimen, demonstrated that patients who underwent treatment at a high-volume facility (HR, 0.81; P < .001) had significantly improved survival., Conclusion: This study shows a better overall survival for sinonasal SCC treated at high-volume centers. Further study may be needed to understand the effect of case volume on the paradigms of sinonasal SCC management.

Background: The mainstay of treating nonfunctioning-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors(NF-PNETs) is surgical resection. However, minimally invasive approaches to pancreatic resection for treating NF-PNETs are not widely accepted, and the long-term oncological outcomes of such approaches remain unknown., Aim: To determine the short- and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive pancreatic resection conducted in patients with NF-PNETs., Methods: Prospective databases from Severance Hospital were searched for 110 patients who underwent curative resection for NF-PNETs between January 2003 and August 2018., Results: The proportion of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedures performed for NF-PNET increased to more than 75% after 2013. There was no significant difference in post-operative complications ( P = 0.654), including pancreatic fistula ( P = 0.890) and delayed gastric emptying ( P = 0.652), between MIS and open approaches. No statistically significant difference was found in disease-free survival between the open approach group and the MIS group (median follow-up period, 28.1 mo; P = 0.428). In addition, the surgical approach (MIS vs open) was not found to be an independent prognostic factor in treating NF-PNET patients [Exp(β) = 1.062; P = 0.929]., Conclusion: Regardless of the type of surgery, a minimally invasive approach can be safe and feasible for select NF-PNET patients., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no potential financial interests., (©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Previous studies have provided evidence of the high expression of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in multiple solid tumors; however, its prognostic relationship with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to better understand the prognostic potential of LDH in mPCa., Methods: In our investigation, we included PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library as web-based resources, as well as studies published before January 2020 on the predictive value of LDH in mPCa. We independently screened the studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, evaluated the quality of the literature, extracted the data, and used RevMan 5.3 and STATA12.0 software for analysis., Result: From the 38 published studies, the records of 9813 patients with mPCa were included in this meta-analysis. We observed that higher levels of LDH in patients with mPCa were significantly associated with poorer overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.91-2.47, P < .00001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.20-2.13, P = .001). The subgroup analyses indicated that the negative prognostic impact of higher levels of LDH on the oncologic outcomes of mPCa was significant regardless of ethnicity, publication year, sample size, analysis type, treatment type, age, and disease state., Conclusion: Our analysis suggested the association between a higher level of LDH and poorer OS and PFS in patients with mPCa. As a parameter that can be conveniently evaluated, the LDH levels should be included as a valuable biomarker in the management of mPCa., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is becoming increasing popular. Since it was introduced, there has been debate about its safety and efficacy when compared with open esophagectomies (OE). We sought to compare the oncologic outcomes of MIE and OE in this study specifically with regards to margin status and nodal retrieval., Methods: Ninety-three patients that underwent MIE (76/93) or OE (17/93) for esophageal cancer at out institution between January 2013 and September 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Histological type, pathological tumor grading, clinical tumor staging (cTNM), pathological tumor staging (pTNM), post-neoadjuvant tumor staging (ypTNM), and lymph node retrieval were obtained and compared., Results: The results show a statistically significant improvement in resection margins (R0) in the MIE group when compared with the OE group. Other oncologic parameters including clinical staging, pathologic staging, tumor grade, neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), and nodal retrieval were not statistically significantly different between the open and MIE groups., Conclusion: The improvement in short-term surgical outcomes in MIE is well established. This study demonstrates that MIE can have superior surgical oncologic outcomes compared to OE, this was specifically an improved R0 margin rate with MIE compared to OE. These results further support the use of MIE in the treatment of esophageal cancer., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2020 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons.)

Background: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities or trunk often require plastic reconstructive transfer of vital tissue for wound closure after resection. Literature on the oncologic outcome of patients receiving flap closure in comparison with patients receiving primary wound closure is very limited., Methods: Patients who underwent resection of a primary extremity or truncal STS without dissemination at our institution between January 2000 until December 2015 were eligible for the study. Patients were divided into two groups based on type of soft tissue closure (primary or flap) while patients receiving skin grafting were excluded. Characteristics, oncologic outcome and prognostic factors of both groups were compared., Results: 781 patients could be included, of these 200 had received flap closure and 581 primary wound closure. Tumors receiving flap closure were significantly smaller but were located in distal extremities and showed a trend towards prior neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Incidence of wound and general complications was similar in both groups. 5-year local recurrence free survival (LRFS, 71% vs. 69%) and 5-year disease specific survival (DSS, 84% vs. 88%) did not differ significantly between patients with primary closure and flap closure. Most important predictors in both groups were tumor size and grading with no major differences in analysis of predictors for both endpoints., Conclusion: Plastic reconstructive surgery plays an important role in limb-conserving STS treatment. Complication rates of patients with flap coverage are not higher than of patients with primary wound closure and oncologic outcome is similar with no major differences in predictors of LRFS and DSS., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The influence of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival in patients with rectal cancer is debatable. The aim of this study was to evaluate relationships between anastomotic leakage and long-term survival., Methods: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, 395 consecutive stage I to III rectal cancer patients underwent anterior resection between 2007 and 2012. Five-year overall survival, 5-year disease-free survival, and 5-year local recurrence-free survival were compared between patients with leakage (Leakage (+)) and patients without leakage (Leakage (-))., Results: Of 395 patients, 50 (12.7%) had anastomotic leakage. Of these 50, 34 (68.0%) required urgent surgery and 16 (32.0%) could be managed by watchful waiting or with percutaneous drainage. The median follow-up period was 62.6 months. Five-year overall survival did not differ between the two groups (Leakage (+) 93.8% vs. Leakage (-) 89.0%, P = 0.121). Five-year disease-free survival also did not differ between the two groups (81.6% vs. 80.3%, P = 0.731), and neither did 5-year local recurrence-free survival (91.9% vs. 86.1%, P = 0.206). In a multivariable Cox regression model, BMI > 25, preoperative CA19-9 > 37, pathological T stage, pathological N stage, and circumferential resection margin (CRM) positive were independent predictors of disease-free survival. Moreover, pathological T stage, pathological N stage, and CRM positive were the only independent predictors of overall survival and local recurrence-free survival. Anastomotic leakage was not a risk factor for overall survival, disease-free survival, or local recurrence-free survival., Conclusion: Anastomotic leakage is not associated with a significant decrease in long-term survival in rectal cancer patients.

Background and Objective: Anastomotic leakage is a serious complication after arterial resection of rectal cancer. It has been found that anastomotic leakage is related to the oncological outcome. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the long-term outcome of the rectal tumor after anastomotic leakage., Methods: The effect of anastomotic leakage on the oncological outcome of rectal cancer was studied by electronic literature retrieval. Using the DerSimonian Laird random effect model to calculate the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval. Research heterogeneity was evaluated by Q statistics and I 2 , and bias was evaluated by funnel plot and Begg's test., Results: A total of 35 studies and 44 698 patients were included in the study. The studies have shown that anastomotic leakage is associated with local recurrence (OR = 1.93; 95% CI, 1.57-2.38; P < .0001), overall survival (OR = 1.64; 95% CI, 1.37-1.95; P < .00001), disease-free survival (OR = 2.07; 95% CI, 1.50-2.87; P < .00001) and cancer-specific survival (OR = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.02-1.70; P = .012), while it was not related to distant recurrence (OR = 1.25; 95% CI, 0.95-1.65; P = .12)., Conclusions: The results showed that anastomotic leakage after anterior resection increased the risk of local recurrence, decreased the overall survival, cancer-specific survival and disease-free survival., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: To carry out a comparison of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma characteristics and behavior between patients in Taiwan and Japan., Methods: A Taiwan urinary tract urothelial carcinoma cohort was obtained from Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, and a Japan urinary tract urothelial carcinoma cohort from Hirosaki University Hospital. The inclusion criteria were urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy. Those who received perioperative chemotherapy were excluded. Finally, 765 patients in the Taiwan cohort and 325 in the Japan cohort were analyzed. The end-point of this study was to study the natural course of urinary tract urothelial carcinoma within 5 years between these two groups., Results: The main finding was that urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients in Taiwan were younger (P < 0.001), more were women (P < 0.001), with low-stage disease (P < 0.001), with more chronic kidney disease (P < 0.001), with less smoking history (P < 0.001), with more bladder cancer history (P = 0.002), with more multifocal (P < 0.001) and less high-grade disease (P = 0.015), as well as less lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.001) and more squamous differentiation (P < 0.001). However, the multivariate Cox regression analysis showed no racial difference in oncologic outcome, such as intravesical recurrence, systemic recurrence or cancer-specific death in primary and propensity-matched cohorts. Bladder cancer history was found to be the most important factor predicting intravesical recurrences, whereas stage was strongly associated with systemic recurrence and cancer specific mortality., Conclusions: The clinical characteristics of urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in Taiwan are significantly different from those of urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in Japan. However, there is no racial difference in stage-specific oncologic outcome after standard nephroureterectomy., (© 2020 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Introduction: Pelvic lymphadenectomy (pLA) in prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common uro-oncologic surgical procedures. An increased complication rate is accompanied by unproven oncologic benefit. Extent of pLA and mechanisms of metastasis are discussed controversially. We aimed to explore evidence and knowledge gaps in pLA and mechanisms of metastasis in PCa and to develop further steps to clarify oncologic benefits through an expert panel., Methods: A multidisciplinary expert meeting was initiated, compiling available facts on pLA and mechanisms of metastasis in PCa. Questions and hypotheses were formulated. The resulting protocol was modeled on priority and consistency in four anonymized voting rounds using the Delphi method (March 2018-June 2018)., Results: The oncologic benefit of pLA in PCa is still unclear. Results of randomized trials (RCTs) are pending. Extent and techniques of pLA are differently applied and inconsistently recommended by the guidelines as well as the indication for pLA. Different growth rates for the primaries and metastases and different survival curves for lymph node and organ metastasis at diagnosis argue against metastasis originating from positive nodes. However, results from clinical and basic research support this opportunity in PCa., Conclusions: The RCTs required to clarify the estimated low oncologic benefit of pLA prove to be difficult because of the great effort (e.g., high case number). Establishing a network of treatment centers for implementation of high-quality cohort studies could be an alternative approach. Future studies with larger panels and international participants based on the presented feasibility should be launched to set this process in motion. Until valid data are available, benefits and harms of pLA should be weighted under consideration of low-invasive techniques (e.g., sentinel pLA).

Objective: We aimed to evaluate oncological outcomes after repeat metastasectomies in patients having undergone previous resections for colorectal cancer metastases., Methods: We examined 248 patients who underwent metastasectomies for lung and/or liver metastases at our center during a 7-year period, from January 2005 to December 2011. Recurrence-free survival 1 (RFS1) after the metastasectomy for the initial recurrence, recurrence-free survival 2 (RFS2) after the second, and recurrence-free survival 3 (RFS3) after the third repeated resections for recurrence were assessed. The overall survival (OS) rate after the first metastasectomy for the first recurrence (OS) was also assessed., Results: Sites of recurrence of the first metastasectomy were the liver, lung, and liver and lung in 115, 117, and 16 cases, respectively, and 133 patients had a second recurrence (133/248, 53.6%). Twenty-seven patients had a third recurrence (27/52, 51.9%), of whom 14 underwent a third metastasectomy. The 5-year and 10-year OS rates were 74.8% and 57.9%, respectively. The 1-year RFS1, RFS2, and RFS3 rates were 76%, 75%, and 39%, respectively. The hazard ratios for RFS were 1.142 and 2.590 for the first and second repeat surgeries, when compared to the first metastasectomy. The third metastasectomy showed significantly lower RFS than did the second metastasectomy., Conclusion: A second metastasectomy should be considered the optimal treatment for a second recurrence. However, careful considerations should be made before performing a third metastasectomy., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.)

The history of prostate brachytherapy has passed one century. In 1983, modern low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy using a transrectal ultrasound-guided procedure was introduced. In the early 1990s, low-dose-rate brachytherapy was introduced and rapidly spread across the USA due to its excellent oncological control, cost-effectiveness and technically easy procedure. Since low-dose-rate brachytherapy was introduced in Japan (2003), over 15 years have passed. More than 43 000 patients have undergone low-dose-rate brachytherapy. Japanese urologists and radiation oncologists are on course with leading brachytherapists in the USA. A nationwide prospective cohort study, J-POPS, was initiated in 2005. The J-POPS group also provides educational programs including an annual novel training course in low-dose-rate brachytherapy to familiarize urologists, radiation oncologists and pathologists with the procedure. Important information on Japanese patients has accumulated, especially by the J-POPS study group. The Japanese investigators reported excellent oncological outcomes of low-dose-rate brachytherapy, showing equivalent or superior efficacy to surgery in low- to intermediate-risk patients, and superior efficacy in high-risk patients using the surgery biochemical recurrence definition (prostate-specific antigen cut-off value of 0.2 ng/mL). Two randomized controlled studies (SHIP study: intermediate risk, and TRIP study: high risk) carried out by the J-POPS group are ongoing, and an additional follow-up study (J-POPS 2 study) has been started to evaluate survival outcomes over longer follow-up periods. Low-dose-rate brachytherapy is expected to provide a survival benefit, which must be confirmed by further studies with longer follow-up periods in the future., (© 2019 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Introduction: Robotic surgery can overcome some limitations of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (L-TME), improving the quality of the surgery. We aim to compare the medium-term oncological outcomes of L-TME vs. robotic total mesorectal excision (R-TME) for rectal cancer., Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed including patients who underwent L-TME or R-TME between 2011 and 2017. Patients presenting with metastatic disease or R1 resection were excluded. From a total of 680 patients, 136 cases of R-TME were matched based on age, gender, stage and time of follow-up with an equal number of patients who underwent L-TME. We compared 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: Major complications were lower in the robotic group (13.2% vs. 22.8%, p = 0.04), highlighting the anastomotic leakage rate (7.4% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.01). The 3-year DFS rate for all stages was 69% for L-TME and 84% for R-TME (p = 0.02). For disease stage III, the 3-year DFS was significantly higher in the R-TME group. OS was also significantly superior in the robotic group for every stage, reaching 86% in stage III. In the multivariate analysis, R-TME was a significant positive prognostic factor for distant metastasis (OR 0.2 95% CI 0.1, 0.6, p = 0.001) and OS (OR 0.2 95% CI 0.07, 0.4, p = 0.000). Moreover, major complications were also found to have a negative impact on OS (OR 8.3 95% CI 3.2, 21.6, p = 0.000)., Conclusion: R-TME for rectal cancer can achieve better oncological outcomes compared with L-TME, especially in stage III rectal cancers. However, a longer follow-up period is needed to confirm these findings.

The oncologic merits of the laparoscopic technique for colorectal cancer surgery remain debatable. Eligible patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer who were scheduled for an elective resection by one surgeon in a medical institution were randomized to either laparoscopic or open surgery. During this period, a total of 188 patients received laparoscopic surgery and the other 163 patients received the open approach. The primary endpoint was cancer-free five-year survival after operative treatment, and the secondary endpoint was the tumor recurrence incidence. Besides, surgical complications were also compared. There was no statistically significant difference between open and laparoscopic groups regarding the average number of lymph nodes dissected, ileus, anastomosis leakage, overall mortality rate, cancer recurrence rate, or cancer-free five-year survival. Even though performing a laparoscopic approach used a significantly longer operation time, this technique was more effective for colorectal cancer treatment in terms of shorter hospital stay and less blood loss. Meanwhile, fewer patients receiving the laparoscopic approach developed postoperative urinary tract infection, wound infection, or pneumonia, which reached statistical significance. For non-metastatic colorectal cancer patients, laparoscopic surgery resulted in better short-term outcomes, whether in several surgical complications and intra-operative blood loss. Though there was no significant statistical difference in terms of cancer-free five-year survival and tumor recurrence, it is strongly recommended that patients undergo laparoscopic surgery if not contraindicated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Currently, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is not an indication for patients with very low-risk prostate cancer. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the usefulness of mpMRI as a diagnostic tool in these patients. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and pathological data of individuals with very low-risk prostate cancer, according to the NCCN guidelines, who underwent mpMRI before radical prostatectomy at our institution between 2010 and 2016. Patients who did not undergo pre-evaluation with mpMRI were excluded. We analyzed the factors associated with biochemical recurrence (BCR) using Cox regression model, logistic regression analysis, and Kaplan–Meier curve. Of 253 very low-risk prostate cancer patients, we observed 26 (10.3%) with BCR during the follow-up period in this study. The median follow-up from radical prostatectomy was 53 months (IQR 33–74). The multivariate Cox regression analyses demonstrated that the only factor associated with BCR in very low-risk patients was increase in the pathologic Gleason score (GS) (HR: 2.185, p-value 0.048). In addition, multivariate logistic analyses identified prostate specific antigen (PSA) (OR: 1.353, p-value 0.010), PSA density (OR: 1.160, p-value 0.013), and suspicious lesion on mpMRI (OR: 1.995, p-value 0.019) as the independent preoperative predictors associated with the pathologic GS upgrade. In our study, the pathologic GS upgrade after radical prostatectomy in very low-risk prostate cancer patients demonstrated a negative impact on BCR and mpMRI is a good prognostic tool to predict the pathologic GS upgrade. We believe that the implementation of mpMRI would be beneficial to determine the treatment strategy for these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive lesion with an unpredictable behavior. Herein, the aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiological characteristics, as well as clinical and functional outcomes of GCTB in a relatively large series of patients., Methods: Patients with the diagnosis of GCTB were included in this retrospective study. Whenever the preservation of the articular surface was possible, surgical options included extended curettage; otherwise, wide resection was implemented. In case of extended curettage, the cavity was filled with cement or bone graft. In addition, the functional and oncologic outcomes of these surgical strategies were compared. The functional outcome of the patients was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system., Results: A total of 120 GCTB patients, including 55 males (45.8%) and 65 females (54.2%), were evaluated. The three involved locations with highest frequency included distal femur (26%), distal radius (22%), and proximal tibia (19%). At a mean follow-up of 125.5±49.2 months, two pulmonary metastases (1.6%) and 12 (10%) local recurrences were observed. In addition, 6 out of 12 (50%) local recurrences occurred in distal radius ( P=0.04 ). The recurrence rate was significantly higher in extended curettage than in wide resection ( P=0.05 ), and the same pattern was observed for allograft, compared to cement filling ( P=0.05 ). The mean MSTS scores for extended curettage and wide resection were 94.7 and 89.1, respectively ( P=0.04 ). Furthermore, the mean MSTS scores for bone graft filling and cement augmentation were obtained as 96 and 93.1, respectively ( P=0.07 )., Conclusion: Based on the findings, wide resection of GCTB was associated with superior oncologic outcome, as well as inferior functional outcome. In extended curettage, cement augmentation resulted in superior oncologic outcome when compared with allograft filling., (2019 © BY THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY.)

Purpose: The efficacy of RARC in oncologic outcomes compared ORC is controversial. We assess potential differences in oncologic outcomes between robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and open radical cystectomy (ORC)., Methods: We performed the literature search systematically according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement. A pooled meta-analysis was performed to assess the difference in oncologic outcomes between RARC and ORC, separately in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRCTs)., Results: Five RCTs and 28 NRCTs were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. There was no difference in the rate of overall positive surgical margin (PSM) in RCTs, while NRCTs showed a lower rate for RARC. There was no difference in the soft tissue PSM rate between RARC and ORC in both RCTs and NRCTs. There was no difference in the lymph node yield by standard and extended lymph node dissection between RARC and ORC in both RCTs and NRCTs. There was no significant difference in survival outcomes between RARC and ORC in both RCTs and NRCTs., Conclusions: Based on the current evidence, there is no difference in the rate of PSMs, lymph node yield, recurrence rate and location as well as short-term survival outcomes between RARC and ORC in RCTs. In NRCTs, only PSM rates were better for RARC compared to ORC, but this was likely due to selection and reporting bias which are inherent to retrospective study designs.

Background: Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) has mainly been chosen for young women with ovarian-confined/well-differentiated epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). In general, FSS consists of at least conservation of contralateral ovary and the uterus with a staging surgery. However, information on the clinical outcome in women who underwent cystectomy as a fertility-preserving option is lacking., Methods: After a central pathological review and search of the medical records from multiple institutions between 1987 and 2015, a total of eight early-stage EOC patients treated with cystectomy as FSS were retrospectively evaluated. Diagnosis and staging were based on International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics criteria (2014). Surgery consisted of uni- or bilateral cystectomy. The oncologic and reproductive outcomes were assessed., Results: The median age was 29 years (range 26-38 years). The median follow-up time was 103.6 months (range 42.2-218.3 months). The stage was IA in 3, IC1 in 4, and IC3 in one patient. Five patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. After cystectomy, two patients experienced recurrence in the pelvic cavity and bilateral ovaries, respectively. The former patient died of the disease 42 months after cystectomy, and conversely, the latter one was rescued by subsequent radical surgery. Four full-term childbirths were observed in three patients., Conclusions: Although oophorectomy is considered as an appropriate fertility-preserving operation, cystectomy may be an unavoidable option when it is the only surgical procedure available. It is desirable to verify the utility by accumulating larger numbers of patients through a future registry system.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncologic outcome of women with stage I ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (EC) who underwent fertility-sparing surgery (FSS)., Materials and Nethods: Between 1986 and 2017, a total of 3227 patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma were retrospectively evaluated based on a central pathological review and search of the medical records from multiple institutions. We identified 24 and 54 patients with stage I EC who underwent FSS and conventional radical surgery (CRS), respectively. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were employed to compare OS between the two groups., Results: With follow-up of a total of 78 patients, 9 patients (11.5%) developed recurrence. In addition, 5 patients (6.4%) died of the disease. Recurrence was noted in 3 (10.7%) patients in the FSS group and 6 (11.1%) patients in the CRS group. Death was noted in 2 (8.3%) patients in the FSS group and 3 (5.6%) patients in the CRS group. In the original cohort, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the FSS and RS groups {Log-rank: OS (P = 0.630), RFS (P = 0.757)}. In the IPTW-adjusted cohort, the 5-year OS rates were 96.6 and 92.4% in patients with FSS and CRS, respectively (P = 0.319). Furthermore, the 5-year RFS rate was 88.6% for the FSS group and 88.1% for the CRS group (Log-rank: P = 0.556)., Conclusions: Young women with stage I EC undergoing FSS showed a relatively satisfactory prognosis, equal to those receiving CRC.