Back to Search Start Over

Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Outcomes: Does Treatment at a High-Volume Center Confer Survival Benefit?

Authors :
Teitelbaum JI
Issa K
Barak IR
Ackall FY
Jung SH
Jang DW
Abi Hachem R
Source :
Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery [Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg] 2020 Nov; Vol. 163 (5), pp. 986-991. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jun 30.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether treatment of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) at a high-volume facility affects survival.<br />Study Design: Retrospective database analysis.<br />Setting: National Cancer Database (2004-2014).<br />Subjects and Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for sinonasal SCC from 2004 to 2014. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics and classification, resection margins, treatment regimen, and facility case-specific volume-averaged per year and grouped in tertiles as low (0%-33%), medium (34%-66%), and high (67%-100%)-were compared. Overall survival was compared with Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.<br />Results: A total of 3835 patients treated for sinonasal SCC between 2004 and 2014 were identified. Therapeutic options included surgery alone (18.6%), radiotherapy (RT) alone (29.1%), definitive chemoradiation (15.4%), surgery with adjuvant RT (22.8%), and combinations (14.1%) of the aforementioned treatments. Patients who underwent surgery with adjuvant RT had better overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; P < .001; 95% CI, 0.63-0.86). As for treatment volume per facility, 7.4% of patients were treated at a low-volume center, 17.5% at a medium-volume center, and 75.1% at a high-volume center. Univariate analysis showed that treatment at a high-volume facility conferred a significantly better overall survival (HR, 0.77; P = .002). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, adjusting for age, sex, tumor classification, and treatment regimen, demonstrated that patients who underwent treatment at a high-volume facility (HR, 0.81; P < .001) had significantly improved survival.<br />Conclusion: This study shows a better overall survival for sinonasal SCC treated at high-volume centers. Further study may be needed to understand the effect of case volume on the paradigms of sinonasal SCC management.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1097-6817
Volume :
163
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32600116
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820935395