Search

The article discusses a study comparing different types of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) prostheses in patients with a small aortic annulus. The study found that TAVR valves with echo-estimated gradients of 20 mm Hg or higher were not dysfunctional and that the risk of high gradients varied depending on the type of valve used. The authors also address criticisms of the study, including the definition of small aortic annulus and the use of a 29-mm self-expanding valve. They conclude by highlighting the need for further research to validate the findings and compare different TAVR platforms in various patient populations. Another article discusses a trial that used an automated telephone service to identify undiagnosed individuals with asthma or COPD. The study contacted over a million people and interviewed over 38,000, resulting in the identification of 595 patients with undiagnosed asthma or COPD. However, the high number needed to screen and the feasibility of the approach in real-world settings are questioned. [Extracted from the article]

Importance: Historically, women with aortic stenosis have experienced worse outcomes and inadequate recognition compared to men, being both underdiagnosed and undertreated, while also facing underrepresentation in clinical trials., Objective: To determine whether women with small aortic annuli undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement have better clinical and hemodynamic outcomes with a self-expanding valve (SEV) or balloon-expandable valve (BEV)., Design, Setting, Participants: The Small Annuli Randomized to Evolut or SAPIEN Trial (SMART) was a large-scale randomized clinical trial focusing on patients with small aortic annuli undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement, randomized to receive SEVs or BEVs and included 716 patients treated at 83 centers in Canada, Europe, Israel, and the US from April 2021 to October 2022. This prespecified secondary analysis reports clinical and hemodynamic findings for all 621 women enrolled in SMART. Data for this report were analyzed from February to April 2024., Interventions: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with an SEV or a BEV., Main Outcomes and Measures: The composite coprimary clinical end point comprised death, disabling stroke, or heart failure-related rehospitalization. The coprimary valve function end point was the incidence of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction, both assessed through 12 months. Secondary end points included the incidence of moderate or severe prosthesis-patient mismatch., Results: A total of 621 women (mean [SD] age, 80.2 [6.2] years; 312 randomized to the SEV group and 309 to the BEV group) were included in the present analysis. At 12 months, there were no significant differences in the coprimary clinical end point between the SEV and BEV groups (9.4% vs 11.8%, absolute risk difference -2.3%; 95% CI -7.2 to 2.5, P = .35). However, SEV implantation was associated with less bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (8.4% vs 41.8%; absolute risk difference, -33.4%; 95% CI, -40.4 to -26.4; P < .001). SEV implantation resulted in lower aortic valve gradients and larger effective orifice areas at 30 days and 12 months and less mild or greater aortic regurgitation at 12 months compared to BEV implantation. Prosthesis-patient mismatch was significantly lower with SEVs, regardless of the definition used and adjustment for body mass index. Use of SEVs was associated with better quality of life outcomes as assessed by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 ordinal quality of life measure., Conclusions and Relevance: Among women with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and small aortic annuli undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement, the use of SEVs, compared to BEVs, resulted in similar clinical outcomes and a markedly reduced incidence of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction through 12 months, including a lower risk of prosthesis-patient mismatch and better 12-month quality of life., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04722250.

Background: Large datasets of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for pure aortic valve regurgitation (PAVR) are scarce., Aims: We aimed to report procedural safety and long-term clinical events (CE) in a contemporary cohort of PAVR patients treated with new-generation devices (NGD)., Methods: Patients with grade III/IV PAVR enrolled in the FRANCE-TAVI Registry were selected. The primary safety endpoint was technical success (TS) according to Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria. The co-primary endpoint was defined as a composite of mortality, heart failure hospitalisation and valve reintervention at last follow-up., Results: From 2015 to 2021, 227 individuals (64.3% males, median age 81.0 [interquartile range {IQR} 73.5-85.0] years, with EuroSCORE II 6.0% [IQR 4.0-10.9]) from 41 centres underwent TAVI with NGD, using either self-expanding (55.1%) or balloon-expandable valves (44.9%; p=0.50). TS was 85.5%, with a non-significant trend towards increased TS in high-volume activity centres. A second valve implantation (SVI) was needed in 8.8% of patients, independent of valve type (p=0.82). Device size was ≥29 mm in 73.0% of patients, post-procedure grade ≥III residual aortic regurgitation was rare (1.2%), and the permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) rate was 36.0%. At 30 days, the incidences of mortality and reintervention were 8.4% and 3.5%, respectively. The co-primary endpoint reached 41.6% (IQR 34.4-49.6) at 1 year, increased up to 61.8% (IQR 52.4-71.2) at 4 years, and was independently predicted by TS, with a hazard ratio of 0.45 (95% confidence interval: 0.27-0.76); p=0.003., Conclusions: TAVI with NGD in PAVR patients is efficient and reasonably safe. Preventing the need for an SVI embodies the major technical challenge. Larger implanted valves may have limited this complication, outweighing the increased risk of PPI. Despite successful TAVI, PAVR patients experience frequent CE at long-term follow-up.

Background and Aims: This trial sought to assess the safety and efficacy of ShortCut, the first dedicated leaflet modification device, prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients at risk for coronary artery obstruction., Methods: This pivotal prospective study enrolled patients with failed bioprosthetic aortic valves scheduled to undergo TAVI and were at risk for coronary artery obstruction. The primary safety endpoint was procedure-related mortality or stroke at discharge or 7 days, and the primary efficacy endpoint was per-patient leaflet splitting success. Independent angiographic, echocardiographic, and computed tomography core laboratories assessed all images. Safety events were adjudicated by a clinical events committee and data safety monitoring board., Results: Sixty eligible patients were treated (77.0 ± 9.6 years, 70% female, 96.7% failed surgical bioprosthetic valves, 63.3% single splitting and 36.7% dual splitting) at 22 clinical sites. Successful leaflet splitting was achieved in all [100%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 94%-100.0%, P < .001] patients. Procedure time, including imaging confirmation of leaflet splitting, was 30.6 ± 17.9 min. Freedom from the primary safety endpoint was achieved in 59 [98.3%; 95% CI (91.1%-100%)] patients, with no mortality and one (1.7%) disabling stroke. At 30 days, freedom from coronary obstruction was 95% (95% CI 86.1%-99.0%). Within 90 days, freedom from mortality was 95% [95% CI (86.1%-99.0%)], without any cardiovascular deaths., Conclusions: Modification of failed bioprosthetic aortic valve leaflets using ShortCut was safe, achieved successful leaflet splitting in all patients, and was associated with favourable clinical outcomes in patients at risk for coronary obstruction undergoing TAVI., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

The percutaneous treatment of structural, valvular, and non-valvular heart disease (SHD) is rapidly evolving. The Core Curriculum (CC) proposed by the EAPCI describes the knowledge, skills, and attitudes that define competency levels required by newly trained SHD interventional cardiologists (IC) and provides guidance for training centres. SHD ICs are cardiologists who have received complete interventional cardiology training. They are multidisciplinary team specialists who manage adult SHD patients from diagnosis to follow-up and perform percutaneous procedures in this area. They are competent in interpreting advanced imaging techniques and master planning software. The SHD ICs are expected to be proficient in the aortic, mitral, and tricuspid areas. They may have selective skills in either the aortic area or mitral/tricuspid areas. In this case, they must still have common transversal competencies in the aortic, mitral, and tricuspid areas. Additional SHD domain competencies are optional. Completing dedicated SHD training, aiming for full aortic, mitral, and tricuspid competencies, requires at least 18 months. For full training in the aortic area, with basic competencies in mitral/tricuspid areas, the training can be reduced to 1 year. The same is true for training in the mitral/tricuspid area, with competencies in the aortic area. The SHD IC CC promotes excellence and homogeneous training across Europe and is the cornerstone of future certifications and patient protection. It may be a reference for future CC for national associations and other SHD specialities, including imaging and cardiac surgery.

Background: Data on procedural and early outcomes after transjugular transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) are limited., Objectives: This study sought to evaluate first-in-man procedural and clinical outcomes after transjugular TTVR with a special focus on patients who received large device sizes in whom TTVR outcomes have been questioned., Methods: The retrospective registry included patients who underwent TTVR using the LuX-Valve Plus system (Jenscare Biotechnology Co Ltd) for symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation (TR) from January 2022 until February 2024 at 15 international centers in a compassionate use setting. The endpoints were procedural TR reduction, in-hospital death, adverse events, and 1-month survival. We further stratified results according to the size of the implanted device (<55 vs ≥55 mm)., Results: The registry included a total of 76 patients at a median age of 78 years (Q1-Q3: 72-83 years, 47.4% women). TR was reduced to ≤2+ and ≤1+ in 94.7% and 90.8% of patients (75.0% of patients received TTVR devices ≥55 mm) with well-sustained results at 1-month follow-up (TR ≤2+ in 95.0% and ≤1+ 86.8%). Residual TR was paravalvular in all cases. In-hospital death occurred in 4 patients (5.3%). Four patients (5.3%) underwent cardiac surgery during index hospitalization. Major in-hospital bleeding events occurred in 5 patients (6.6%). New in-hospital pacemaker implantation was required in 3.9% of patients in the overall cohort (5.7% in "pacemaker-naive" individuals). No cases of valve thrombosis, stroke, myocardial infarction, or pulmonary embolism were observed. At 1-month follow-up, survival was 94.4%, and NYHA functional class significantly improved. One further patient received a pacemaker, 1 further bleeding event occurred, and 2 patients underwent reintervention or surgery within the first 30 days after TTVR. No differences in procedural outcomes or adverse events were observed after stratification for valve size., Conclusions: Transjugular TTVR appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with severe TR with comparable outcomes in very large tricuspid anatomies., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Stolz has received speaker honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Cheung has received speaker honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Vascular, and Medtronic; and has served as an eligibility committee member for the TRINITY trial. Dr Boone has served as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott. Dr Fam has served as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, and Cardiovalve. Dr Villablanca has served as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Angiodynamic, Telflex, and Abiomed. Dr De Backer has received institutional research grants and consulting fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. Dr Tchétché has served as consultant for Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. Dr So has served as a proctor for Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Latib has served on the Advisory Board for Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Shifamed, NeoChord Inc, V-dyne, and Philips. Dr Scotti has served as a consultant for NeoChord and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Estévez-Loureiro has served as a consultant to Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, Venus Medtech, and Jenscare. Dr Leurent has received speaker and proctoring honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott Medical. Dr Hausleiter has received research support and speaker honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

There are limited data from randomized controlled trials assessing the impact of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgery in women with aortic stenosis and small aortic annuli. We evaluated 2-year clinical and hemodynamic outcomes after aortic valve replacement to understand acute valve performance and early and midterm clinical outcomes. This post hoc analysis pooled women enrolled in the randomized, prospective, multicenter Evolut Low Risk and Surgical Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (SURTAVI) intermediate risk trials. Women with severe aortic stenosis at low or intermediate surgical risk who had a computed tomography-measured annular perimeter of ≤72.3 mm were included and underwent self-expanding, supra-annular TAVR or surgery. The primary end point was 2-year all-cause mortality or disabling stroke rate. The study included 620 women (323 TAVR, 297 surgery) with a mean age of 78 years. At 2 years, the all-cause mortality or disabling stroke was 6.5% for TAVR and 8.0% for surgery, p = 0.47. Pacemaker rates were 20.0% for TAVR and 8.3% for surgery, p <0.001. The mean effective orifice area at 2 years was 1.9 ± 0.5 cm 2 for TAVR and 1.6 ± 0.5 cm 2 for surgery and the mean gradient was 8.0 ± 4.1 versus 12.7 ± 6.0 mm Hg, respectively (both p <0.001). Moderate or severe patient-prothesis mismatch at discharge occurred in 10.9% of patients who underwent TAVR and 33.2% of patients who underwent surgery, p <0.001. In conclusion, in women with small annuli, the clinical outcomes to 2 years were similar between self-expanding, supra-annular TAVR and surgery, with better hemodynamics in the TAVR group and fewer pacemakers in the surgical group., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Thomas Modine reports administrative support, article publishing charges, statistical analysis, and writing assistance were provided by Medtronic. Thomas Modine reports a relationship with Abbott that includes: consulting or advisory. Thomas Modine reports a relationship with Medtronic that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. Thomas Modine reports a relationship with Microport that includes: consulting or advisory. Thomas Modine reports a relationship with Edwards Lifesciences that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. Thomas Modine reports a relationship with Jenscare Scientific Co that includes: consulting or advisory. John K. Forrest reports a relationship with Edwards Lifesciences that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. John K. Forrest reports a relationship with Medtronic that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. Nicolas M.Van Mieghem reports a relationship with Medtronic that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. Nicolas M.Van Mieghem reports a relationship with Abbott that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. Nicolas M.Van Mieghem reports a relationship with Edwards Lifesciences that includes: funding grants. Nicolas M.Van Mieghem reports a relationship with Boston Scientific that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. Nicolas M.Van Mieghem reports a relationship with Abiomed that includes: funding grants. Nicolas M.Van Mieghem reports a relationship with PulseCath BV that includes: funding grants. Nicolas M.Van Mieghem reports a relationship with Daiichi Sankyo that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. Nicolas M.Van Mieghem reports a relationship with JenaValve that includes: consulting or advisory. Nicolas M.Van Mieghem reports a relationship with Anteris Technologies that includes: consulting or advisory. Nicolas M.Van Mieghem reports a relationship with Siemens that includes: consulting or advisory. Nicolas M.Van Mieghem reports a relationship with Pie Medical Imaging BV that includes: consulting or advisory. Nicolas M.Van Mieghem reports a relationship with Amgen that includes: consulting or advisory. Michael Deeb reports a relationship with Medtronic that includes: funding grants. Steven J. Yakubov reports a relationship with Boston Scientific that includes: funding grants. Steven J. Yakubov reports a relationship with Medtronic that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. Walid Ben Ali reports a relationship with Medtronic that includes: funding grants. Walid Ben Ali reports a relationship with Edwards Lifesciences that includes: funding grants. Didier Tchetche reports a relationship with Abbott that includes: consulting or advisory. Didier Tchetche reports a relationship with Boston Scientific that includes: consulting or advisory. Didier Tchetche reports a relationship with Edwards Lifesciences that includes: consulting or advisory. Didier Tchetche reports a relationship with Medtronic that includes: consulting or advisory. Jae K. Oh reports a relationship with Echocardiography Core Laboratory that includes: employment. Jae K. Oh reports a relationship with Medtronic that includes: consulting or advisory. Jae K. Oh reports a relationship with REDNVIA that includes: funding grants. Jian Huang reports a relationship with Medtronic that includes: employment and equity or stocks. Michael J. Reardon reports a relationship with Medtronic that includes: funding grants. Michael J. Reardon reports a relationship with Abbott that includes: consulting or advisory. Michael J. Reardon reports a relationship with Boston Scientific that includes: consulting or advisory. Michael J. Reardon reports a relationship with Gore Medical that includes: consulting or advisory. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Abbott that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Abiomed that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Affluent Medical that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Alleviant Medical that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Amgen that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with AM-Pharma that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Arena that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with AtriCure Inc that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Biosensors that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Biotronik that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Boston Scientific that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Bristol-Myers Squibb that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with CardiaWave that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with CeloNova that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with CERC that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Chiesi that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Concept Medical that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Cytosorbents that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Daiichi Sankyo that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Duke that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Element Science that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Essential Medical that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Faraday that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Idorsia Pharmaceuticals that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Janssen that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with MedAlliance that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Mediasphere that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Medtelligence that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Medtronic that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with MJH Healthcare that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with OrbusNeich that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Penumbra that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with PhaseBio that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Philips that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Pi-Cardia that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with PLx Pharma that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Population Health Research Institute that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Protembis that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with RecCor Medical Inc that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with RenalPro that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with RM Global that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Sanofi that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Shockwave that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Vivasure that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Zoll that includes: funding grants. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Cardiovascular Research Foundation that includes: consulting or advisory. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Cordis that includes: consulting or advisory. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with E.R. Squibb & Sons that includes: consulting or advisory. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Esperion Science Innovative Biopharma that includes: consulting or advisory. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Europa Group Boston Scientific that includes: consulting or advisory. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Gaffney Events that includes: consulting or advisory. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Educational Trust that includes: consulting or advisory. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Ionis Pharmaceuticals that includes: consulting or advisory. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with MedCon International that includes: consulting or advisory. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with NovoNordisk that includes: consulting or advisory. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with PeerView Institute for Medical Education that includes: consulting or advisory. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Terumo Europe NV that includes: consulting or advisory. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Vectura that includes: consulting or advisory. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with VoxMedia that includes: consulting or advisory. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with WebMD that includes: consulting or advisory. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with IQVIA that includes: consulting or advisory. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Radcliffe that includes: consulting or advisory. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with TARSUS Cardiology that includes: consulting or advisory. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Applied Therapeutics that includes: equity or stocks. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Elixir Medical that includes: equity or stocks. Roxana Mehran reports a relationship with Stel that includes: equity or stocks. Co-author serves on scientific advisory board for AMA, Women in Innovations Committee Member for SCAI, Associate Editor for JAMA Cardiology, BOT Member, SC Member CTR Program for ACC - RM If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Patients with severe aortic stenosis and a small aortic annulus are at risk for impaired valvular hemodynamic performance and associated adverse cardiovascular clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR)., Methods: We randomly assigned patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and an aortic-valve annulus area of 430 mm 2 or less in a 1:1 ratio to undergo TAVR with either a self-expanding supraannular valve or a balloon-expandable valve. The coprimary end points, each assessed through 12 months, were a composite of death, disabling stroke, or rehospitalization for heart failure (tested for noninferiority) and a composite end point measuring bioprosthetic-valve dysfunction (tested for superiority)., Results: A total of 716 patients were treated at 83 sites in 13 countries (mean age, 80 years; 87% women; mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality, 3.3%). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients who died, had a disabling stroke, or were rehospitalized for heart failure through 12 months was 9.4% with the self-expanding valve and 10.6% with the balloon-expandable valve (difference, -1.2 percentage points; 90% confidence interval [CI], -4.9 to 2.5; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients with bioprosthetic-valve dysfunction through 12 months was 9.4% with the self-expanding valve and 41.6% with the balloon-expandable valve (difference, -32.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -38.7 to -25.6; P<0.001 for superiority). The aortic-valve mean gradient at 12 months was 7.7 mm Hg with the self-expanding valve and 15.7 mm Hg with the balloon-expandable valve, and the corresponding values for additional secondary end points through 12 months were as follows: mean effective orifice area, 1.99 cm 2 and 1.50 cm 2 ; percentage of patients with hemodynamic structural valve dysfunction, 3.5% and 32.8%; and percentage of women with bioprosthetic-valve dysfunction, 10.2% and 43.3% (all P<0.001). Moderate or severe prosthesis-patient mismatch at 30 days was found in 11.2% of the patients in the self-expanding valve group and 35.3% of those in the balloon-expandable valve group (P<0.001). Major safety end points appeared to be similar in the two groups., Conclusions: Among patients with severe aortic stenosis and a small aortic annulus who underwent TAVR, a self-expanding supraannular valve was noninferior to a balloon-expandable valve with respect to clinical outcomes and was superior with respect to bioprosthetic-valve dysfunction through 12 months. (Funded by Medtronic; SMART ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04722250.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

The identification and management of patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are of major importance, but the lack of standardised definitions is challenging for trial design, data interpretation, and clinical decision-making. The Valve Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (VARC-HBR) is a collaboration among leading research organisations, regulatory authorities, and physician-scientists from Europe, the USA, and Asia, with a major focus on TAVI-related bleeding. VARC-HBR is an initiative of the CERC (Cardiovascular European Research Center), aiming to develop a consensus definition of TAVI patients at HBR, based on a systematic review of the available evidence, to provide consistency for future clinical trials, clinical decision-making, and regulatory review. This document represents the first pragmatic approach to a consistent definition of HBR evaluating the safety and effectiveness of procedures, devices and drug regimens for patients undergoing TAVI..

Background: Vascular complications (VCs) still represent one of the principal concerns of trans-femoral trans-catheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR). New-generation devices can minimize such complications but the arterial access management is left to the operator's choice. This study aims to describe the rate of VCs in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing TAVR with new-generation devices and to determine whether an ultrasound-guided (USG) vs. a fluoroscopy-guided (FG) femoral access management has an impact on their prevention., Methods: This is a prospective, observational, multicenter study. Consecutive patients undergoing TAVR with new-generation devices were analyzed from January 2022 to October 2022 in five tertiary care centers. Femoral accesses were managed according to the operator's preferences. All the patients underwent a pre-discharge peripheral ultrasound control. VCs and bleedings were the main endpoints of interest., Results: A total of 458 consecutive patients were enrolled (274 in the USG group and 184 in the FG group). VCs occurred in 6.5 % of the patients (5.2 % minor and 1.3 % major). There was no difference between the USG and the FG groups in terms of any VCs (7.3 % vs. 5.4 %; p = 0.4), or any VARC-3 bleedings (6.9 % vs 6 %, p = 0.9). At logistic regression analysis, the two guidance strategies did not result as predictors of VCs (odds Ratio 0.8, 95 % Confidence Interval 0.46-1.4; P = 0.4)., Conclusions: In a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing TAVR with new-generation devices, the occurrence of VCs is low and mostly represented by minor VCs. USG and FG modalities did not affect the rate of VCs., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai has consulted for Amarin, Balmed, Cardionovum, Crannmedical, Endocore Lab, Eukon, Guidotti, Innovheart, Meditrial, Microport, Opsens Medical, Terumo, and Translumina, outside the present work. All other authors report no conflict of interest. Cristina Aurigemma has been involved in advisory board activities by Abbott, Abiomed, Medtronic, and Biotronic. Enrico Romagnoli received speaker fees from St. Jude. Carlo Trani and Francesco Burzotta received speakers' fees from Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Medtronic and Terumo. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis is a complex anatomical scenario for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Favorable short-term clinical outcomes have been reported with TAVI in this setting, but long-term data are scarce., Methods: We retrospectively included, in a single-center registry, patients with BAV stenosis who underwent TAVI before 2020. We compared patients treated with self-expanding valves (SEV) versus balloon-expandable valves (BEV). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke and need for aortic valve (AV) reintervention at 3 years. Secondary endpoints included each component of the primary endpoint, cardiovascular mortality, permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) rate, mean gradient and ≥moderate paravalvular leak (PVL) rate., Results: A total of 150 consecutive patients (SEV = 83, BEV = 67) were included. No significant differences were reported between SEV and BEV groups for the primary composite endpoint (SEV 35.9% vs. BEV 32%, p = 0.66), neither for clinical secondary endpoints (all-cause mortality SEV 28.1% vs. BEV 28%, p = 0.988; cardiovascular mortality SEV 14.1% vs. BEV 20%, p = 0.399; stroke SEV 12.5% vs. BEV 6%, p = 0.342; need for AV reintervention SEV 0% vs. BEV 0%; PPI SEV 28.1% vs. BEV 24%, p = 0.620). A lower mean gradient persisted up to 3 years in the SEV group (SEV 8.8 ± 3.8 mmHg vs. BEV 10.7 ± 3.2 mmHg, p = 0.063), while no significant difference was found in the rate of ≥ moderate PVL (SEV 3/30 vs. BEV 0/25, p = 0.242)., Conclusions: In this single center registry, we observed favorable 3-year clinical outcomes in nonselected BAV patients treated with different generation devices, without significant differences between patients receiving SEV or BEV., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: In the recent Evolut Low Risk randomized trial, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was shown to be non-inferior to surgery (SAVR) regarding the composite end point of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke at 24 months., Aims: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of self-expandable TAVI in low-risk patients, using the French healthcare system as the basis for analysis., Methods: Mortality, health-related quality of life, and clinical event rates through two-year follow-up were derived from trial data (N = 725 TAVI and N = 678 SAVR; mean age: 73.9 years; mean STS-PROM: 1.9%). Cost inputs were based on real-world data for TAVI and SAVR procedures in the French healthcare system. Costs and effectiveness as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were projected to lifetime via a decision-analytic model under assumption of no mortality difference beyond two years. The discounted incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was evaluated against a willingness-to-pay threshold of €50,000 per QALY gained. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted, including assumptions about differential long-term survival., Results: For the base case, mean survival was 13.69 vs 13.56 (+ 0.13) years for TAVI and SAVR, respectively. Discounted QALYs were 9.34 vs. 9.21 (+ 0.13) and discounted lifetime costs €52,267 vs. €51,433 (+ €833), resulting in a lifetime ICER of €6368 per QALY gained. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, TAVI was found dominant or cost-effective in 74.4% of samples., Conclusion: TAVI in patients at low surgical risk is a cost-effective alternative to SAVR in the French healthcare system. Longer follow-up data will help increase the accuracy of lifetime survival projections., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic adversely affected health care systems. Patients in need of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are especially susceptible to treatment delays., Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on global TAVR activity., Methods: This international registry reported monthly TAVR case volume in participating institutions prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic (January 2018 to December 2021). Hospital-level information on public vs private, urban vs rural, and TAVR volume was collected, as was country-level information on socioeconomic status, COVID-19 incidence, and governmental public health responses., Results: We included 130 centers from 61 countries, including 65,980 TAVR procedures. The first and second pandemic waves were associated with a significant reduction of 15% (P < 0.001) and 7% (P < 0.001) in monthly TAVR case volume, respectively, compared with the prepandemic period. The third pandemic wave was not associated with reduced TAVR activity. A greater reduction in TAVR activity was observed in Africa (-52%; P = 0.001), Central-South America (-33%; P < 0.001), and Asia (-29%; P < 0.001). Private hospitals (P = 0.005), urban areas (P = 0.011), low-volume centers (P = 0.002), countries with lower development (P < 0.001) and economic status (P < 0.001), higher COVID-19 incidence (P < 0.001), and more stringent public health restrictions (P < 0.001) experienced a greater reduction in TAVR activity., Conclusions: TAVR procedural volume declined substantially during the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in Africa, Central-South America, and Asia. National socioeconomic status, COVID-19 incidence, and public health responses were associated with treatment delays. This information should inform public health policy in case of future global health crises., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Lefèvre has served as a proctor for Edwards Lifesciences; and received minor fees from Boston Scientific, Terumo, and Abbott. Dr Pilgrim has received research, travel, or educational grants to the institution without personal remuneration from Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and ATSens; and speaker fees and consultancy fees to the institution from Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, Biosensors, and Highlife. Dr Van Mieghem has received research grant support from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Teleflex; and advisory board fees from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Inari, JenaValve, Medtronic, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Siemens, Pie Medical, and Teleflex. Dr Swaans has served as a proctor/lecturer for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Bioventrix Inc, Cardiac Dimensions, Edwards Lifesciences, GE Healthcare, Medtronic, and Philips Healthcare. Dr Prendergast has received speaker/consultancy fees from Medtronic, MicroPort, Anteris, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Resar has received institutional research funding from Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, and Abbott; and served as a TAVR proctor for Medtronic. Dr Chen has served as a consultant for Venus MedTech. Dr Hildick-Smith has received research funds and speaker fees from Medtronic. Dr Spence has received TAVR proctoring and consultancy fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Bunc has served as a proctor for Abbott, Meril, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Molnár has served as a consultant for Medtronic and Abbott. Dr Toggweiler has served as a consultant and proctor for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Biosensors; has served as a proctor for Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott Vascular; has served as a consultant for Medira, Shockwave, Teleflex, atHeart Medical, Cardiac Dimensions, and Polares Medical; has received institutional research grants from Boston Scientific, Fumedica, and Novartis; has received speaker honoraria from Sanofi, AstraZeneca, ReCor Medical, and Daiichi Sankyo; and holds equity in Hi-D Imaging. Dr Ojeda has received consulting fees from Medtronic and Edwards Lifesciences; and speaker fees from Philips and Word Medica. Dr Toutouzas has served as a proctor for Medtronic, Abbott, Myval, and Boston Scientific. Dr AlMerri has served as a TAVR proctor for Medtronic. Dr Noble has served as a proctor for Medtronic; and received institutional grant support from Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, and Medtronic. Dr Kala has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific; served on the Speakers Bureau for Edwards Lifesciences, Servier, and AstraZeneca; and received research support from Novartis. Dr Kurt has served as a TAVR proctor for Abbott. Dr Yin has served as a TAVR proctor for Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, and Abbott. Dr Sztejfman has served as a proctor for Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Meril Life Sciences, and MicroPort. Dr Mendiz has served as a proctor for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Gunasekaran has received fees from Medtronic, Meril Life Sciences, Abbott, and Boston Scientific. Dr Kao has served as a proctor for Medtronic and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Dager has served as a consultant for Medtronic. Dr Ferrero-Guadagnoli has served as a proctor for Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Modine has served as a consultant for and received honorarium from Abbott, Medtronic, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Hayashida has served as a proctor for Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Abbott. Dr Makkar has received research grants from Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and Boston Scientific, and served as a consultant for Cordis and Medtronic. Dr Mylotte has received institutional grant funding from Boston Scientific and Medtronic; and personal fees from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and MicroPort. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Transfemoral (TF) access is default in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Transaxillary (TAx) access has been shown to be a safe alternative in case of prohibitive iliofemoral anatomy, but whether TAx as preferred access has similar safety and efficacy as TF access is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between patients treated with self-expanding devices using TF or TAx route as preferred access in TAVI., Methods: A single center cohort of 354 patients treated using TAx as preferred access and a multi-center cohort of 5980 patients treated using TF access were compared. Propensity score matching was used to reduce selection bias and potential confounding. After propensity score matching, each group consisted of 322 patients. Clinical outcomes according to VARC-2 were compared using chi-square test., Results: In 6334 patients undergoing TAVI, mean age was 81.4 ± 7.0 years, 57% was female and median logistic EuroSCORE was 14.7% (IQR 9.5-22.6). In the matched population (age 79.3 ± 7.0, 50% female, logistic EuroSCORE 13.4%, IQR 9.0-21.5), primary outcomes 30-day and one-year all-cause mortality were similar between Tax and TF groups (30 days: 5% versus 6%, p = 0.90; 1 year: 20% versus 16%, p = 0.17). Myocardial infarction was more frequent in patients undergoing Tax TAVI compared with TF (4% versus 1%, p = 0.05), but new permanent pacemakers were less frequently implanted (12% versus 21%, p = 0.001)., Conclusion: TAx as preferred access is feasible and safe with outcomes that are comparable to TF access., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement Dr. van Wely is a proctor for Abbott Vascular. Dr. van Nieuwkerk has no relevant disclosures. Dr. Rooijakkers has no relevant disclosures. Dr. van der Wulp has no relevant disclosures. Dr. Gehlmann is a proctor for Abbott Vascular and Medtronic. Dr. van Garsse is a proctor for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. de Brito Jr. is a proctor for Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic. Dr. Geuzebroek has no relevant dislclosures. Dr. Baz has no relevant disclosures. Dr. Tchétché has no relevant disclosures. Dr. De Brito Jr. has no relevant disclosures. Dr. Barbanti is consultant for Edwards Lifesciences and received speaker honoraria from Medtronic and Biotronik. Dr. Kornowski has no relevant disclosures. Dr. Latib is a consultant for Medtronic and has received honoraria from Abbott Vascular. Dr. D'Onofrio is a proctor for Edwards Lifesciences and for Symetis. Dr. Ribichini has no relevant disclosures. Dr. Dangas has no relevant disclosures. Dr. Mehran has no relevant disclosures. Dr. Delewi has no relevant disclosures. Dr. van Royen received research grants from Abbott Vascular, Philips, and Biotronik, speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular and is consultant for Medtronic, Rainmed and Castor., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Bleeding is one of the most frequent complications in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Importantly, major bleeding is associated with poor clinical outcomes after TAVR. However, large studies on bleeding complications in the contemporary TAVR population are limited., Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, temporal trends, clinical outcomes, and predictors of bleeding in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR., Methods: The CENTER2 study is a pooled patient-level database from 10 clinical studies including patients who underwent TAVR between 2007 and 2022., Results: A total of 23,562 patients underwent transfemoral TAVR. The mean age was 81.5 ± 6.7 years, and 56% were women. Major bleeding within the first 30 days was observed in 1,545 patients (6.6%). Minor bleeding was reported in 1,143 patients (4.7%). Rates of major bleeding decreased from 11.5% in 2007-2010 to 5.5% in 2019-2022 (P trend  < 0.001). Dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with higher major bleeding rates compared with single antiplatelet therapy (12.2% vs 9.1%; OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.13-1.72; P = 0.002). Patients with major bleeding had increased mortality risk during the first 30 days (14.1% vs 4.3%; OR: 3.66; 95% CI: 3.11-4.31; P < 0.001) and during 1-year follow-up (27.8% vs 14.5%; HR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.41-1.59; P < 0.001). Minor bleeding did not affect 1-year mortality risk (16.7% vs 14.5%; HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.93-1.32; P = 0.27). Predictors of major bleeding were female sex and peripheral vascular disease., Conclusions: Bleeding complications remain frequent and important in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR. Increased mortality risk in major bleeding persists after the initial 30 days. (Cerebrovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With Balloon-Expandable Valves Versus Self-Expandable Valves [CENTER]; NCT03588247)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was supported by the Netherlands CardioVascular Research Initiative: the Dutch Heart Foundation (CVON 2018-28 and 2012-06 Heart Brain Connection), the Dutch Federation of University Medical Centres, the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, and the Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences. Dr de Brito is a proctor for Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic. Dr Barbanti is consultant for Edwards Lifesciences; and has received speaker honoraria from Medtronic and Biotronik. Dr Latib is a consultant for Medtronic; and has received honoraria from Abbott Vascular. Dr Pagnesi has received personal fees from Abbott Vascular. Dr Delewi has received educational grants from Boston Scientific and Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: For patients with symptomatic, severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR), early results of transcatheter tricuspid valve (TV) intervention studies have shown significant improvements in functional status and quality of life associated with right-heart reverse remodelling. Longer-term follow-up is needed to confirm sustained improvements in these outcomes., Methods: The prospective, single-arm, multicentre TRISCEND study enrolled 176 patients to evaluate the safety and performance of transcatheter TV replacement in patients with ≥moderate, symptomatic TR despite medical therapy. Major adverse events, reduction in TR grade and haemodynamic outcomes by echocardiography, and clinical, functional, and quality-of-life parameters are reported to one year., Results: Enrolled patients were 71.0% female, mean age 78.7 years, 88.0% ≥ severe TR, and 75.4% New York Heart Association classes III-IV. Tricuspid regurgitation was reduced to ≤mild in 97.6% (P < .001), with increases in stroke volume (10.5 ± 16.8 mL, P < .001) and cardiac output (0.6 ± 1.2 L/min, P < .001). New York Heart Association class I or II was achieved in 93.3% (P < .001), Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score increased by 25.7 points (P < .001), and six-minute walk distance increased by 56.2 m (P < .001). All-cause mortality was 9.1%, and 10.2% of patients were hospitalized for heart failure., Conclusions: In an elderly, highly comorbid population with ≥moderate TR, patients receiving transfemoral EVOQUE transcatheter TV replacement had sustained TR reduction, significant increases in stroke volume and cardiac output, and high survival and low hospitalization rates with improved clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes to one year. Funded by Edwards Lifesciences, TRISCEND ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04221490., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: The optimal timing to perform percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients remains unknown., Aims: We sought to compare different PCI timing strategies in TAVI patients., Methods: The REVASC-TAVI registry is an international registry including patients undergoing TAVI with significant, stable coronary artery disease (CAD) at preprocedural workup. In this analysis, patients scheduled to undergo PCI before, after or concomitantly with TAVI were included. The main endpoints were all-cause death and a composite of all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or rehospitalisation for congestive heart failure (CHF) at 2 years. Outcomes were adjusted using the inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) method., Results: A total of 1,603 patients were included. PCI was performed before, after or concomitantly with TAVI in 65.6% (n=1,052), 9.8% (n=157) or 24.6% (n=394), respectively. At 2 years, all-cause death was significantly lower in patients undergoing PCI after TAVI as compared with PCI before or concomitantly with TAVI (6.8% vs 20.1% vs 20.6%; p<0.001). Likewise, the composite endpoint was significantly lower in patients undergoing PCI after TAVI as compared with PCI before or concomitantly with TAVI (17.4% vs 30.4% vs 30.0%; p=0.003). Results were confirmed at landmark analyses considering events from 0 to 30 days and from 31 to 720 days., Conclusions: In patients with severe aortic stenosis and stable coronary artery disease scheduled for TAVI, performance of PCI after TAVI seems to be associated with improved 2-year clinical outcomes compared with other revascularisation timing strategies. These results need to be confirmed in randomised clinical trials.

Background: Prospective data about transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients are limited., Aims: We aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of the Evolut PRO and R (34 mm) self-expanding prostheses in BAV patients and explore the impact of different computed tomography (CT) sizing algorithms in a prospective registry., Methods: A total of 149 bicuspid patients were treated in 14 countries. The primary endpoint was the intended valve performance at 30 days. Secondary endpoints were 30-day and 1-year mortality, severe patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) and the ellipticity index at 30 days. All study endpoints were adjudicated according to Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria., Results: The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 2.6% (1.7-4.2). Type I L-R BAV was observed in 72.5% of the patients. Evolut valve sizes 29 and 34 mm were utilised in 49.0% and 36.9% of the cases, respectively. The 30-day cardiac death rate was 2.6%; the 1-year cardiac death rate was 11.0%. Valve performance at 30 days was observed in 142/149 (95.3%) patients. The mean aortic valve area post-TAVI was 2.1 (1.8-2.6) cm 2 , and the mean aortic gradient was 7.2 (5.4-9.5) mmHg. No patient had more than moderate aortic regurgitation at 30 days. PPM was observed in 13/143 (9.1%) surviving patients and was severe in 2 patients (1.6%). Valve function was maintained at 1 year. The mean ellipticity index remained 1.3 (interquartile range 1.2-1.4). Overall, 30-day and 1-year clinical and echocardiography outcomes were similar between the two sizing strategies., Conclusions: BIVOLUTX demonstrated a favourable bioprosthetic valve performance and good clinical outcomes after TAVI with the Evolut platform in patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis. No impact from the sizing methodology could be identified.

Background: A steep rise in the use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for the management of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis occurred. Minimalist TAVI procedures and streamlined patient pathways within experienced Heart Valve Centres are designed to overcome the challenges of ever-increasing procedural volume., Aims: The 2022 European TAVI Pathway Survey aims to describe contemporary TAVI practice across Europe., Materials and Methods: Between October and December 2022, TAVI operators from 32 European countries were invited to complete an online questionnaire regarding their current practice., Results: Responses were available from 147 TAVI centres in 26 countries. In 2021, the participating centres performed a total number of 27,223 TAVI procedures, with a mean of 185 TAVI cases per centre (median 138; IQR 77-194). Treatment strategies are usually (87%) discussed at a dedicated Heart Team meeting. Transfemoral TAVI is performed with local anaesthesia only (33%), with associated conscious sedation (60%), or under general anaesthesia (7%). Primary vascular access is percutaneous transfemoral (99%) with secondary radial access (52%). After uncomplicated TAVI, patients are transferred to a high-, medium-, or low-care unit in 28%, 52%, and 20% of cases, respectively. Time to discharge is day 1 (12%), day 2 (31%), day 3 (29%), or day 4 or more (28%)., Conclusion: Reported adoption of minimalist TAVI techniques is common among European TAVI centres, but rates of next-day discharge remain low. This survey highlights the significant progress made in refining TAVI treatment and pathways in recent years and identifies possible areas for further improvement., Competing Interests: DM: consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Microport. TR: proctor and advisor for JenaValve, speaker’s honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and JenaValve. JW: institutional grant from Medtronic and speaker’s honoraria (also to the institution) from Boston Scientific and Sinomed. SO: consulting fees from Medtronic and Edwards, speaker’s honoraria from Philips and World Medical, and research grant (PI21/00949) from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Instituto de Salud Carlos III). LL: proctoring and consulting honoraria for Abbott, Edwards, and Medtronic. DB: proctoring and consulting honoraria for Abbott, Edwards, and Medtronic. NM: institutional research grant support from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Medtronic, Daiichi Sankyo, Astra Zeneca, and PulseCath BV; and consultancy fees from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Medtronic, Daiichi Sankyo, Abiomed, Amgen, JenaValve, Anteris, and PulseCath BV. MG: Boston Scientific—research and travel grants, speaker’s honoraria, proctor, and advisory board member; Medtronic—research and travel grants, speaker’s honoraria, proctor, advisory board member; Abbott—speaker’s honoraria and travel grants; and Edwards Lifesciences—speakers honoraria and travel grants. BP: speaker’s fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, and Medtronic and consulting fees from Anteris and Microport. ODB: institutional research grants and consulting fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer JS declared a past co-authorship with the author ODB to the handling editor., (© 2023 Rosseel, Mylotte, Cosyns, Vanhaverbeke, Zweiker, Teles, Angerås, Neylon, Rudolph, Wykrzykowska, Patterson, Costa, Ojeda, Tzikas, Abras, Leroux, Van Belle, Tchétché, Bleiziffer, Swaans, Parma, Blackman, Van Mieghem, Grygier, Redwood, Prendergast, Van Camp and De Backer.)

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Beneduce has received speaker fees from Boston Scientific. Dr Dumonteil has received consultancy and proctoring fees from Abbott Vascular, Ancora Heart, Boston Scientific, Edwards LifeSciences, and Medtronic. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.