Back to Search Start Over

Self-Expanding or Balloon-Expandable TAVR in Patients with a Small Aortic Annulus.

Authors :
Herrmann HC
Mehran R
Blackman DJ
Bailey S
Möllmann H
Abdel-Wahab M
Ben Ali W
Mahoney PD
Ruge H
Wood DA
Bleiziffer S
Ramlawi B
Gada H
Petronio AS
Resor CD
Merhi W
Garcia Del Blanco B
Attizzani GF
Batchelor WB
Gillam LD
Guerrero M
Rogers T
Rovin JD
Szerlip M
Whisenant B
Deeb GM
Grubb KJ
Padang R
Fan MT
Althouse AD
Tchétché D
Source :
The New England journal of medicine [N Engl J Med] 2024 Jun 06; Vol. 390 (21), pp. 1959-1971. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 07.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Patients with severe aortic stenosis and a small aortic annulus are at risk for impaired valvular hemodynamic performance and associated adverse cardiovascular clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR).<br />Methods: We randomly assigned patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and an aortic-valve annulus area of 430 mm <superscript>2</superscript> or less in a 1:1 ratio to undergo TAVR with either a self-expanding supraannular valve or a balloon-expandable valve. The coprimary end points, each assessed through 12 months, were a composite of death, disabling stroke, or rehospitalization for heart failure (tested for noninferiority) and a composite end point measuring bioprosthetic-valve dysfunction (tested for superiority).<br />Results: A total of 716 patients were treated at 83 sites in 13 countries (mean age, 80 years; 87% women; mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality, 3.3%). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients who died, had a disabling stroke, or were rehospitalized for heart failure through 12 months was 9.4% with the self-expanding valve and 10.6% with the balloon-expandable valve (difference, -1.2 percentage points; 90% confidence interval [CI], -4.9 to 2.5; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients with bioprosthetic-valve dysfunction through 12 months was 9.4% with the self-expanding valve and 41.6% with the balloon-expandable valve (difference, -32.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -38.7 to -25.6; P<0.001 for superiority). The aortic-valve mean gradient at 12 months was 7.7 mm Hg with the self-expanding valve and 15.7 mm Hg with the balloon-expandable valve, and the corresponding values for additional secondary end points through 12 months were as follows: mean effective orifice area, 1.99 cm <superscript>2</superscript> and 1.50 cm <superscript>2</superscript> ; percentage of patients with hemodynamic structural valve dysfunction, 3.5% and 32.8%; and percentage of women with bioprosthetic-valve dysfunction, 10.2% and 43.3% (all P<0.001). Moderate or severe prosthesis-patient mismatch at 30 days was found in 11.2% of the patients in the self-expanding valve group and 35.3% of those in the balloon-expandable valve group (P<0.001). Major safety end points appeared to be similar in the two groups.<br />Conclusions: Among patients with severe aortic stenosis and a small aortic annulus who underwent TAVR, a self-expanding supraannular valve was noninferior to a balloon-expandable valve with respect to clinical outcomes and was superior with respect to bioprosthetic-valve dysfunction through 12 months. (Funded by Medtronic; SMART ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04722250.).<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1533-4406
Volume :
390
Issue :
21
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The New England journal of medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38587261
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2312573