201. Feasibility and reproducibility of a cardiovascular magnetic resonance free-breathing, multi-shot, navigated image acquisition technique for ventricular volume quantification during continuous exercise
- Author
-
Sven Plein, David M. Higgins, Graham Fent, Peter P Swoboda, James R. J. Foley, John P Greenwood, Louise A. E. Brown, Christopher E.D. Saunderson, Thomas P. Craven, Abigail L. Cook, Karen M. Birch, Pankaj Garg, Carrie Ferguson, Pei G. Chew, and Said Ibeggazene
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Mitral regurgitation ,Reproducibility ,Ejection fraction ,Supine position ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Cardiac index ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,Physical exercise ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,Heart rate ,medicine ,Cardiology ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Original Article ,business - Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) image acquisition techniques during exercise typically requires either transient cessation of exercise or complex post-processing, potentially compromising clinical utility. We evaluated the feasibility and reproducibility of a navigated image acquisition method for ventricular volumes assessment during continuous physical exercise. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers underwent supine cycle ergometer (Lode) exercise CMR on two separate occasions using a free-breathing, multi-shot, navigated, balanced steady-state free precession cine pulse sequence. Images were acquired at 3-stages, baseline and during steady-state exercise at 55% and 75% maximal heart rate (HR(max)), based on a prior supine cardiopulmonary exercise test. Intra-and inter-observer variability and inter-scan reproducibility were derived. Clinical feasibility was tested in a separate cohort of patients with severe mitral regurgitation (n=6). RESULTS: End-diastolic volume (EDV) of both LV and RV decreased during exercise at 55% and 75% HR(max), although a reduction in RVEDV index was only observed at 75% HR(max). Ejection fractions (EF) for both ventricles were significantly higher at 75% HR(max) compared to their respective baselines (LVEF 68%±3% vs. 58%±5%, P=0.001; RVEF 66%±4% vs. 58%±7%, P=0.02). Intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility of LV parameters was excellent at all 3-stages. Although measurements of RVESV were more variable during exercise, the reproducibility of both RVEF and RV cardiac index was excellent (CV
- Published
- 2020