Back to Search Start Over

Insight Into Myocardial Microstructure of Athletes and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Authors :
Christian T. Stoeck
Jürgen E. Schneider
Erica Dall’Armellina
Louise A.E. Brown
Amrit Chowdhary
Irvin Teh
Nicholas Jex
Anshuman Sengupta
H Ben-Arzi
Peter P Swoboda
Stephen P. Page
Arka Das
John P Greenwood
Sven Plein
Thomas P. Craven
Nicholas Maxwell
Sebastian Kozerke
Christopher E.D. Saunderson
C Kelly
University of Zurich
Dall'Armellina, Erica
Source :
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 53 (1)
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) remains the commonest cause of sudden cardiac death among young athletes. Differentiating between physiologically adaptive left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy observed in athletes' hearts and pathological HCM remains challenging. By quantifying the diffusion of water molecules, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) MRI allows voxelwise characterization of myocardial microstructure. Purpose To explore microstructural differences between healthy volunteers, athletes, and HCM patients using DTI. Study Type Prospective cohort. Population Twenty healthy volunteers, 20 athletes, and 20 HCM patients. Field Strength/Sequence 3T/DTI spin echo. Assessment In‐house MatLab software was used to derive mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) as markers of amplitude and anisotropy of the diffusion of water molecules, and secondary eigenvector angles (E2A)—reflecting the orientations of laminar sheetlets. Statistical Tests Independent samples t‐tests were used to detect statistical significance between any two cohorts. Analysis of variance was utilized for detecting the statistical difference between the three cohorts. Statistical tests were two‐tailed. A result was considered statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05. Results DTI markers were significantly different between HCM, athletes, and volunteers. HCM patients had significantly higher global MD and E2A, and significantly lower FA than athletes and volunteers. (MDHCM = 1.52 ± 0.06 × 10−3 mm2/s, MDAthletes = 1.49 ± 0.03 × 10−3 mm2/s, MDvolunteers = 1.47 ± 0.02 × 10−3 mm2/s, P

Details

ISSN :
15222586 and 10531807
Volume :
53
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRIReferences
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a8019b7f5a85606761c09aa490f15be2