Search

American institutionalist economists have critiqued market transactions since the 19th century, and this reflects upon the concept of higgling. Higgling originated as the process of bargaining in a marketplace, and some economists have expanded it to cover modern institutional systems. However, critics such as Thorstein Veblen and John R. Commons found flaws in markets. Veblen debunked the idea of natural equilibrium arising in markets, while Commons' transaction basis included other factors in negotiations.

Jean-Baptiste Say's analysis of markets indicates a rejection of higgling as a useful concept for modern economics. Higgling originated as the process of bargaining in a marketplace, and some economists have expanded it to cover modern institutional systems. However, Say found that markets clear under perfect freedom, due to competition of supply and demand. Higgling would be an indication of disequilibrium or social disorder.

The sales techniques and social aspects of street merchants known as pitchers can be contrasted and compared to higgling. Higgling originated as the process of bargaining in a marketplace, and some economists have studied it. Pitchers have been studied from a sociological perspective. They are European or British primarily, and they use extensive crowd patter. Techniques include audience participation and humor, to sell items such as housewares and toys. Similarities and differences from higgling exist.

Higgling has been studied by experiments in both economics and social psychology, in the form of bargaining by two persons. The concept of higgling originated as the process of bargaining in a marketplace, and the adoption of game theory into economics spurred experiments on it. However, economics studies have uncovered divergent factors outside of traditional theory, while psychological studies have also produced varied conclusions.

Frank Knight's economic theories of exchange behavior were a critique of neoclassicism which bear upon higgling. Higgling originated as the process of bargaining in a marketplace, and some economists have expanded it to cover modern institutional systems. However, Knight found that the classical economic man did not higgle, but rather acted in a market as if in a game. He sought to focus the maximizing behavior of neoclassicism so that good qualities such as sportsmanship could emerge .

Higgling has been studied in economic anthropology, and this approach could improve its understanding in economics. Higgling originated as the process of bargaining in a marketplace, and some economists have studied it. However, the anthropologists Marshall Sahlins and Bronislaw Malinowski conceived it as exchange and barter. Malinowski published some of his work in the 1920s, while Sahlins has published on higgling since 1969.

John Bates Clark was an American economist who relied upon morality as a criterion for analysis of the marketplace. This is illustrated by his critique of higgling. Higgling originated as the process of bargaining in a marketplace, and some economists have expanded it to cover modern institutional systems. However, Clark emphasized that mutual advantage was the proper goal of exchange, thereby placing justice above price.

John Maynard Keynes' analysis of financial markets came in part from personal experience and study of market psychology. He was an observer and participant in the markets, but he also read economics literature on speculation in market exchanges. He incorporated his understanding of psychology into his book 'The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.' Scholars have missed these sources of Keynes' thinking.

William Thornton's support of higgling inspired many 19th century economists to develop ideas of supply and demand as a critical response. His 1869 book 'On Labour' rejected natural laws for price determination, and he noted the influence of factors such as higgling. Higgling originated as the process of bargaining in a marketplace. However, the law of supply and demand was favored by such men as H.C. Jenkin and W. Stanley Jevons.

Higgling is a temporary, irrelevant effect in the transition to a market economy, and this is reflected in the economic writings of David Hume. Higgling originated as the process of bargaining in a marketplace, and some economists have expanded it to cover modern institutional systems. However, Hume shows markets involve stable values such as the keeping of promises. Market contracts are a significant aspect of Hume's work, which scholars have overlooked.

Higgling, or bargaining in the marketplace, has been a marginal topic in economics books, and this illustrates the importance of language use in economic thinking. Although higgling could be viewed as a central concept for markets, different meanings have been ascribed to it in varying contexts. For example, Adam Smith mentioned it as a value measure in the early parts of his book 'The Wealth of Nations', but others viewed it as a process for creating value.

The short selling of commodity shares in 17th century Holland illustrates some of the problems with a view of higgling as a stable market function. Short selling got out of control, with ethical lapses, duplicity and public outrage expressed in publications. Legal regulatory actions resulted. Contrary to some modern views of higgling, the bargaining process by itself did not lead to fair and honest prices for supply and demand.

Higgling, or bargaining in the market, can be viewed as the main social communication process of a money economy, and this view is reflected in German writings on money from 1900 to 1945. This theory of higgling requires the communication abilities of self-reference and self-reproduction, besides self-observation. German writings cover these aspects, predominantly self-reference. Examples occur in Josef Schumpeter's and Georg Simmel's works.

The economic market has developed over history, and its distributive and allocative functions may be less relevant in modern times. The concept of higgling has been taken from the bargaining process of personal buying and selling in ancient marketplaces, and adopted into theory as a function of modern markets. Ancient Greeks, Romans, and 18th and 17th century English had legal and ethical standards of higgling. However, higgling may not have broader market importance today.

A discussion of the market factors which affect consumer behavior is presented. A definition of market is not easy to arrive at because of the rapid changes changes among manufacturers, suppliers, consumers and by internationalization and segmentation. Some of the major market changes discussed are the increasing number and varieties of product categories, the technological advances attained by many products and the variety of meanings which brands are called upon to convey.

An analysis of a decision support system is presented. The analysis establishes the need for such a system which will explain marketplace possibilities of sizeand time. The methodology presented focuses on the customer for product class under consideration and the transition of a marketplace life cycle for such a class. It is shown that a vital difference between the two variables emerge as part of the marketplace life cycle.

Bradford Market in Leeds, England, is often crowded with shoppers despite the small population of the city of Bradford. This seemingly endless shopping may be the fulfillment of the desire to believe in financial success rather than an expression of an economic need. On the other hand, it could also be a means of escape from thoughts of death. This death could be physical death or the death of dreams.

We return to the literature on collective villages and reexamine its central arguments. In doing so, we focus on an institution for allocating land that we call the Rule. As claimed by its advocates, the Rule secures land allocations that result in outcomes differing from those that would be achieved by markets. The outcomes are not constrained to be efficient. But the economic costs paid fail to secure the attainment of guarantees of subsistence, greater equality, or a greater sense of community resulting from the elimination of envy. However, in the face of high levels of risk, the form of collective property rights embodied in the Rule may create what we call 'communities of (mis)fortune,' in which no one can envy others' gains or losses resulting from the random shocks of nature.

Many Latin American nations have focused efforts towards the formation of a common market in the region. In a common market, the free circulation of goods and services will be guaranteed. However, the relative lack of controls can have a negative impact on consumer protection. The Southern Common Market agreement between Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay has similar consumer protection features as that of the EC model but without a fixed body for the redress of grievances.

The front cover story of The American Conservative (Barber, 2007), 'I shop therefore I am' was provocative yet insightful, playing on Descartes' proof 'I think, therefore I am,' a common [...]