201. Effects of remote monitoring on clinical outcomes and use of healthcare resources in heart failure patients with biventricular defibrillators: results of the MORE-CARE multicentre randomized controlled trial.
- Author
-
Boriani, Giuseppe, Da Costa, Antoine, Quesada, Aurelio, Ricci, Renato Pietro, Favale, Stefano, Boscolo, Gabriele, Clementy, Nicolas, Amori, Valentina, Mangoni di S. Stefano, Lorenza, Burri, Haran, and MORE-CARE Study Investigators
- Subjects
- *
DEFIBRILLATORS , *CARDIOVASCULAR disease treatment , *HEART transplantation , *HOSPITAL care , *EMERGENCY medical services , *HEART failure treatment , *CARDIAC pacemakers , *CARDIAC pacing , *CARDIOVASCULAR diseases , *COMPARATIVE studies , *PATIENT aftercare , *HOSPITAL emergency services , *LONGITUDINAL method , *RESEARCH methodology , *MEDICAL cooperation , *MORTALITY , *PATIENT monitoring , *RESEARCH , *STATISTICAL sampling , *TELEMEDICINE , *EVALUATION research , *RANDOMIZED controlled trials - Abstract
Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of remote monitoring in patients with heart failure implanted with a biventricular defibrillator (CRT-D) with advanced diagnostics.Methods and Results: The MORE-CARE trial is an international, prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Within 8 weeks of de novo implant of a CRT-D, patients were randomized to undergo remote checks alternating with in-office follow-ups (Remote arm) or in-office follow-ups alone (Standard arm). The primary endpoint was a composite of death and cardiovascular (CV) and device-related hospitalization. Use of healthcare resources was also evaluated. A total of 865 eligible patients (mean age 66 ± 10 years) were included in the final analysis (437 in the Remote arm and 428 in the Standard arm) and followed for a median of 24 (interquartile range = 15-26) months. No significant difference was found in the primary endpoint between the Remote and Standard arms [hazard ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-1.30, P = 0.89] or in the individual components of the primary endpoint (P > 0.05). For the composite endpoint of healthcare resource utilization (i.e. 2-year rates of CV hospitalizations, CV emergency department admissions, and CV in-office follow-ups), a significant 38% reduction was found in the Remote vs. Standard arm (incidence rate ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.58-0.66, P < 0.001) mainly driven by a reduction of in-office visits.Conclusions: In heart failure patients implanted with a CRT-D, remote monitoring did not reduce mortality or risk of CV or device-related hospitalization. Use of healthcare resources was significantly reduced as a result of a marked reduction of in-office visits without compromising patient safety.Trial Registration: NCT00885677. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF