201. Reply to Hearty and Tormey: Use the scientific method to test geologic hypotheses, because rocks do not whisper
- Author
-
Daniel L. Harris, Michael R. Sandstrom, Maureen E. Raymo, N.A.K. Nandasena, Paolo Stocchi, William J. D’Andrea, Elisa Casella, Alessio Rovere, Blake Dyer, and Thomas Lorscheid
- Subjects
Multidisciplinary ,Tsunami wave ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Philosophy ,Settore GEO/04 - Geografia Fisica e Geomorfologia ,Letters ,010502 geochemistry & geophysics ,01 natural sciences ,Classics ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Test (assessment) - Abstract
Hearty and Tormey (1) challenge our conclusions (2), incorrectly arguing that the megaboulders we discuss were shown to originate from the cliff bottom. A number of mischaracterizations are made by Hearty and Tormey (1) in their letter. First, we do not use a “tsunami wave model.” Second, we do not address the two other Bahamian landforms Hearty and Tormey (1) mention: their “superstorm” genesis interpretation [for which alternative hypotheses have been proposed (3, 4)] has no bearing on our (2) conclusions. Hearty and Tormey’s (1) claim that the boulders have “fingerprints” based on “several physical criteria” and “data from multiple disciplines” is false. Only two mega-boulder “physical properties” were reported by Hearty … [↵][1]1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: arovere{at}marum.de. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1
- Published
- 2018