Search

KLHL and the related KBTBD genes encode components of the Cullin-E3 ubiquitin ligase complex and typically target tissue-specific proteins for degradation, thereby affecting differentiation, homeostasis, metabolism, cell signaling, and the oxidative stress response. Despite their importance in cell function and disease (especially, KLHL40, KLHL41, KBTBD13, KEAP1, and ENC1), previous studies of epigenetic factors that affect transcription were predominantly limited to promoter DNA methylation. Using diverse tissue and cell culture whole-genome profiles, we examined 17 KLHL or KBTBD genes preferentially expressed in skeletal muscle or brain to identify tissue-specific enhancer and promoter chromatin, open chromatin (DNaseI hypersensitivity), and DNA hypomethylation. Sixteen of the 17 genes displayed muscle- or brain-specific enhancer chromatin in their gene bodies, and most exhibited specific intergenic enhancer chromatin as well. Seven genes were embedded in super-enhancers (particularly strong, tissue-specific clusters of enhancers). The enhancer chromatin regions typically displayed foci of DNA hypomethylation at peaks of open chromatin. In addition, we found evidence for an intragenic enhancer in one gene upregulating expression of its neighboring gene, specifically for KLHL40/HHATL and KLHL38/FBXO32 gene pairs. Many KLHL/KBTBD genes had tissue-specific promoter chromatin at their 5′ ends, but surprisingly, two (KBTBD11 and KLHL31) had constitutively unmethylated promoter chromatin in their 3′ exons that overlaps a retrotransposed KLHL gene. Our findings demonstrate the importance of expanding epigenetic analyses beyond the 5′ ends of genes in studies of normal and abnormal gene regulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Human naïve pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) represent an optimal homogenous starting point for molecular interventions and differentiation strategies. This is in contrast to the standard primed PSCs which fluctuate in identity and are transcriptionally heterogeneous. However, despite many efforts, the maintenance and expansion of human naïve PSCs remains a challenge. Here, we discuss our recent strategy for the stabilization of human PSC in the naïve state based on the use of a single chemical inhibitor of the related kinases CDK8 and CDK19. These kinases phosphorylate and negatively regulate the multiprotein Mediator complex, which is critical for enhancer-driven recruitment of RNA Pol II. The net effect of CDK8/19 inhibition is a global stimulation of enhancers, which in turn reinforces transcriptional programs including those related to cellular identity. In the case of pluripotent cells, the presence of CDK8/19i efficiently stabilizes the naïve state. Importantly, in contrast to previous chemical methods to induced the naïve state based on the inhibition of the FGF-MEK-ERK pathway, CDK8/19i-naïve human PSCs are chromosomally stable and retain developmental potential after long-term expansion. We suggest this could be related to the fact that CDK8/19 inhibition does not induce DNA demethylation. These principles may apply to other fate decisions. Image 1 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Innate immune responses rely on rapid and precise gene regulation mediated by accessibility of regulatory regions to transcription factors (TFs). In natural killer (NK) cells and other innate lymphoid cells, competent enhancers are primed during lineage acquisition, and formation of de novo enhancers characterizes the acquisition of innate memory in activated NK cells and macrophages. Here, we investigated how primed and de novo enhancers coordinate to facilitate high-magnitude gene induction during acute activation. Epigenomic and transcriptomic analyses of regions near highly induced genes (HIGs) in NK cells both in vitro and in a model of Toxoplasma gondii infection revealed de novo chromatin accessibility and enhancer remodeling controlled by signal-regulated TFs STATs. Acute NK cell activation redeployed the lineage-determining TF T-bet to de novo enhancers, independent of DNA-sequence-specific motif recognition. Thus, acute stimulation reshapes enhancer function through the combinatorial usage and repurposing of both lineage-determining and signal-regulated TFs to ensure an effective response. • Inducible high-density p300 enhancers form in proximity to highly dynamic genes • Strong transcriptional induction occurs with both primed and non-primed enhancers • De novo enhancers form in vivo during NK cell response to Toxoplasma gondii infection • STATs initiate chromatin opening with T-bet redeployment to non-canonical sites During development, innate lymphocytes acquire defined sets of primed enhancers facilitating the rapid immune response. In this issue of Immunity , Sciumè et al. delineate the epigenetic changes occurring during acute NK cell activation, revealing the formation of de novo enhancers and repurposing of both lineage-determining and signal-regulated transcription factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glioma is the most common primary malignant tumor in the human brain. Although there are a variety of treatments, such as surgery, radiation and chemotherapy, glioma is still an incurable disease. Super-enhancers (SEs) are implicated in the control of tumor cell identity, and they promote oncogenic transcription, which supports tumor cells. Inhibition of the SE complex, which is required for the assembly and maintenance of SEs, may repress oncogenic transcription and impede tumor growth. In this review, we discuss the unique characteristics of SEs compared to typical enhancers, and we summarize the recent advances in the understanding of their properties and biological role in gene regulation. Additionally, we highlight that SE-driven lncRNAs, miRNAs and genes are involved in the malignant phenotype of glioma. Most importantly, the application of SE inhibitors in different cancer subtypes has introduced new directions in glioma treatment. • SEs is an enhancer cluster with cell-type specificity, which defines the identity and biological function. • SEs promotes glioma progression by affecting the transcription of protein-coding genes and non-coding genes. • SEs may be applied in clinical practice for the diagnosis, prognosis or treatment of glioma. • SEs inhibitors block the gene transcription by inhibiting the transcription factors of SEs-complex. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Methyltransferase-like 14 (METTL14) participates in tumorigenesis in several malignancies, but how METTL14 mediates the metastasis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has never been reported. Methods: Western blotting, quantitative real-time PCR, and immunohistochemistry were used to determine the mRNA and protein levels of relevant genes. Methylated RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing and RNA sequencing were utilized to screen potential targets of METTL14. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing and assay for transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing were performed to investigate epigenetic alterations. The biological roles and mechanisms of METTL14/BPTF in promoting lung metastasis were confirmed in vitro and in vivo using cell lines, patient samples, xenograft models, and organoids. Results: Utilizing the TCGA-KIRC and Ruijin-RCC datasets, we found low expression of METTL14 in mRCC samples, which predicted poor prognosis. METTL14 deficiency promoted RCC metastasis in vitro and in vivo . Mechanistically, METTL14-mediated m 6 A modification negatively regulated the mRNA stability of bromodomain PHD finger transcription factor (BPTF) and depended on BPTF to drive lung metastasis. Accumulated BPTF in METTL14-deficient cells remodeled the enhancer landscape to reinforce several oncogenic crosstalk. Particularly, BPTF constituted super-enhancers that activate downstream targets like enolase 2 and SRC proto-oncogene nonreceptor tyrosine kinase, leading to glycolytic reprogramming of METTL14 -/- cells. Finally, we determined the efficacy of the BPTF inhibitor AU1 in suppressing mRCC of patient-derived cells, mRCC-derived organoids (MDOs), and orthotopic xenograft models. Conclusions: Our study is the first to investigate the essential role of m 6 A modification and the METTL14/BPTF axis in the epigenetic and metabolic remodeling of mRCC, highlighting AU1 as a vital therapeutic candidate., Competing Interests: Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists., (© The author(s).)

Transcriptional enhancers have been defined by their ability to operate independent of distance and orientation in plasmid-based reporter assays of gene expression. At present, histone marks are used to identify and define enhancers but do not consider the endogenous role of an enhancer in the context of native chromatin. We employed a combination of genomic editing, single cell analyses, and sequencing approaches to investigate a Nanog-associated cis-regulatory element, which has been reported by others to be either an alternative promoter or a super-enhancer. We first demonstrate both distance and orientation independence in native chromatin, eliminating the issues raised with plasmid-based approaches. We next demonstrate that the dominant super-enhancer modulates Nanog globally and operates by recruiting and/or initiating RNA Polymerase II. Our studies have important implications to how transcriptional enhancers are defined and how they regulate gene expression., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Super-enhancers (SE) have become a popular concept and are widely used as a feature defining key identity genes. Here, we provide perspectives on the use of SE to define and identify cell/tissue-identity genes. By mining SE and their associated genes using murine functional genomics data, we highlight and discuss current limitations and open questions regarding both the sensitivity and specificity of identity genes/transcription factors predicted by SE. In this context, we point to cell/tissue-specific promoters as an important additional level of information, which we propose to combine with SE when aiming to define potential identity genes.

Recent methodological advances have enabled the genome-wide interrogation of chromatin from primary tumor tissues. Integrative analysis of histone post-translational modifications, transcription factor (TF) binding and open chromatin sites in tumors across cancer stages can elucidate the aberrant epigenetic states accompanying tumor progression. Cancer-associated chromatin alterations can activate or inactivate enhancers at genes involved in cancer while still respecting cell-of-origin constrictions. Accordingly, enhancer analysis in cancer could have uses for biomarker discovery to further refine patient diagnosis and potentially sub-classify patients for tailored therapy. Methodologies used for chromatin analyses of primary tissues need to address issues distinct from cell line studies including the specific sources of variability coming from the heterogeneous cellular composition of tissues and from inter-individual (epi)genetic differences. This leads to requirements for careful histological analysis to select the specific samples and cells of interest. In analyzing tumors somatic changes should be taken into account to distinguish the genuine epigenetic changes across tumor specimens from any genetic alterations such as copy number variations (CNV). In this contribution we review a selection of current results from chromatin profiling, examine experimental methodologies and discuss specific analysis approaches. We also review specific considerations regarding tissue preparation for epigenetic analysis and conclude with our perspectives on emerging approaches that will impact studies of chromatin landscapes of clinical samples in the future. Unlabelled Image [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The transition of neural progenitors to differentiated postmitotic neurons is mainly considered irreversible in physiological conditions. In the present work, we show that Shh pathway activation through SmoM2 expression promotes postmitotic neurons dedifferentiation, re-entering in the cell cycle and originating medulloblastoma in vivo. Notably, human adult patients present inactivating mutations of the chromatin reader BRPF1 that are associated with SMO mutations and absent in pediatric and adolescent patients. Here, we found that truncated BRPF1 protein, as found in human adult patients, is able to induce medulloblastoma in adult mice upon SmoM2 activation. Indeed, postmitotic neurons re-entered the cell cycle and proliferated as a result of chromatin remodeling of neurons by BRPF1. Our model of brain cancer explains the onset of a subset of human medulloblastoma in adult individuals where granule neuron progenitors are no longer present. • SmoM2 overexpression promotes cerebellar granule neurons dedifferentiation in vivo • SmoM2 and mutant BRPF1 cooperation in vivo mimics human adult SHH MBs • Granule neurons are putative cells of origin of adult SHH MBs • Truncated BRPF1 increases the accessibility of a subset of super-enhancers Medulloblastoma is a brain tumor affecting the cerebellum of infants and adults. Aiello et al. establish a mouse model for adult onset, which allows investigation of the pathogenesis of the disease and identifies neurons as putative cells of origin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PD-L1 and PD-L2 are important targets for immune checkpoint blockade, but how tumor cells achieve their expression remains to be addressed. Here, we find that PD-L1 and PD-L2 are co-expressed in cancer cell lines and tissues across different cancer types. In breast cancer, MDA-MB-231 and SUM-159 cells show high expression of both PD-L1 and PD-L2. The expression of both PD-L1 and PD-L2 is greatly reduced upon treatment of inhibitors of super-enhancers. Bioinformatic analysis identifies a potential super-enhancer (PD-L1L2-SE) that is located between the CD274 and CD273 genes. Genetic deletion of PD-L1L2-SE profoundly reduces the expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2. PD-L1L2-SE-deficient cancer cells fail to generate immune evasion and are sensitive to T cell-mediated killing. Notably, epigenetic activation of such a region (PD-L1L2-SE) is correlated with PD-L1 and PD-L2. Taken together, we identify a super-enhancer (PD-L1L2-SE) that is responsible for the overexpression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 as well as immune evasion in cancer. • Synchronous expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 is dependent on super-enhancers • The PD-L1L2-SE is a super-enhancer located between the genes encoding PD-L1 and PD-L2 • PD-L1L2-SE mediates immune evasion by driving PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression • The activation of PD-L1L2-SE associates with PD-L1 and PD-L2 in cancer patients It is largely unknown how cancer cells achieve the expression of the twin co-inhibitory ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2. Xu et al. report a super-enhancer called PD-L1L2-SE located between the genes encoding PD-L1 and PD-L2 that can induce immune evasion through synchronously initiating the expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Variable levels of DNA methylation have been reported at tissue-specific differential methylation regions (DMRs) overlapping enhancers, including super-enhancers (SEs) associated with key cell identity genes, but the mechanisms responsible for this intriguing behavior are not well understood. We used allele-specific reporters at the endogenous Sox2 and Mir290 SEs in embryonic stem cells and found that the allelic DNA methylation state is dynamically switching, resulting in cell-to-cell heterogeneity. Dynamic DNA methylation is driven by the balance between DNA methyltransferases and transcription factor binding on one side and co-regulated with the Mediator complex recruitment and H3K27ac level changes at regulatory elements on the other side. DNA methylation at the Sox2 and the Mir290 SEs is independently regulated and has distinct consequences on the cellular differentiation state. Dynamic allele-specific DNA methylation at the two SEs was also seen at different stages in preimplantation embryos, revealing that methylation heterogeneity occurs in vivo. • Allele-specific reporters revealed dynamic DNA methylation of Sox2 and miR290 SEs • DNMTs and transcription factor binding regulate methylation dynamics • SE DNA methylation directly regulates transcription in cis • Dynamic DNA methylation is co-regulated with MED1 recruitment and H3K27ac level Song et al. used an allelic reporter approach to show super-enhancers allelic DNA methylation dynamics underlies locus-specific heterogeneity, which functionally impacts transcription and cellular states of mouse embryonic stem cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Super-enhancers (SEs) in a broad range of human cell types are large clusters of enhancers with aberrant high levels of transcription factor binding, which are central to drive expression of genes in controlling cell identity and stimulating oncogenic transcription. Cancer cells acquire super-enhancers at oncogene and cancerous phenotype relies on these abnormal transcription propelled by SEs. Furthermore, specific inhibitors targeting SEs assembly and activation have offered potential targets for treating various tumors including hematological malignancies. Here, we first review the identification, functional significance of SEs. Next, we summarize recent findings of SEs and SE-driven gene regulation in normal hematopoiesis and hematologic malignancies. The importance and various modes of SE-mediated MYC oncogene amplification are illustrated. Finally, we highlight the progress of SEs as selective therapeutic targets in basic research and clinical trials. Some open questions regarding functional significance and future directions of targeting SEs in the clinic will be discussed too. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Elucidation of the sequence of events underlying the dynamic interaction between transcription factors and chromatin states is essential. Maternal transcription factors function at the top of the regulatory hierarchy to specify the primary germ layers at the onset of zygotic genome activation (ZGA). We focus on the formation of endoderm progenitor cells and examine the interactions between maternal transcription factors and chromatin state changes underlying the cell specification process. Endoderm-specific factors Otx1 and Vegt together with Foxh1 orchestrate endoderm formation by coordinated binding to select regulatory regions. These interactions occur before the deposition of enhancer histone marks around the regulatory regions, and these TFs recruit RNA polymerase II, regulate enhancer activity, and establish super-enhancers associated with important endodermal genes. Therefore, maternal transcription factors Otx1, Vegt, and Foxh1 combinatorially regulate the activity of super-enhancers, which in turn activate key lineage-specifying genes during ZGA. • Otx1 and Vegt drive endoderm fate as dual-function transcription factors (TFs) • Otx1, Vegt, and Foxh1 co-occupy enhancers and control zygotic gene activation (ZGA) • TF co-occupancy precedes chromatin dynamics in enhancers and super-enhancers • Super-enhancer-associated genes are endodermal factors activated during ZGA How do maternal transcription factors interact with chromatin regions to coordinate the endodermal gene regulatory program? Paraiso et al. demonstrate that combinatorial binding of maternal Otx1, Vegt, and Foxh1 to select enhancers and super-enhancers in the genome controls endodermal cell fate specification during zygotic gene activation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chromatin interactions are important for gene regulation and cellular specialization. Emerging evidence suggests many-body spatial interactions play important roles in condensing super-enhancer regions into a cohesive transcriptional apparatus. Chromosome conformation studies using Hi-C are limited to pairwise, population-averaged interactions; therefore unsuitable for direct assessment of many-body interactions. We describe a computational model, CHROMATIX, which reconstructs ensembles of single-cell chromatin structures by deconvolving Hi-C data and identifies significant many-body interactions. For a diverse set of highly active transcriptional loci with at least 2 super-enhancers, we detail the many-body functional landscape and show DNase accessibility, POLR2A binding, and decreased H3K27me3 are predictive of interaction-enriched regions.

Precise control of developmental processes is encoded in the genome in the form of gene regulatory networks (GRNs). Such multi-factorial systems are difficult to decode in vertebrates owing to their complex gene hierarchies and dynamic molecular interactions. Here we present a genome-wide in vivo reconstruction of the GRN underlying development of the multipotent neural crest (NC) embryonic cell population. By coupling NC-specific epigenomic and transcriptional profiling at population and single-cell levels with genome/epigenome engineering in vivo, we identify multiple regulatory layers governing NC ontogeny, including NC-specific enhancers and super-enhancers, novel trans-factors, and cis-signatures allowing reverse engineering of the NC-GRN at unprecedented resolution. Furthermore, identification and dissection of divergent upstream combinatorial regulatory codes has afforded new insights into opposing gene circuits that define canonical and neural NC fates early during NC ontogeny. Our integrated approach, allowing dissection of cell-type-specific regulatory circuits in vivo, has broad implications for GRN discovery and investigation., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Glioblastoma (GBM), the most common primary brain tumor, is the most aggressive human cancers, with a median survival rate of only 14.6 months. Temozolomide (TMZ) is the frontline chemotherapeutic drug in GBM. Drug resistance is the predominant obstacle in TMZ therapy. Drug resistance occurs via multiple pathways such as DNA mismatch repair and base excision repair systems, by which glioma cells acquire chemoresistance to some extent (5% and 95%, respectively). Histone3 Lysin27 residue-acetylation (H3K27ac) status regulates cis-regulatory elements, which increases the likelihood of gene transcription. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) complex deacetylate lysine residues on core histones, leading to a decrease in gene transcription. In cis-regulatory element regions, complexes with HDAC repress histones by H3K27ac deacetylation. The cis-regulating and three-dimensional transcriptional mechanism is called "super-enhancer". RET finger protein (RFP) is a protein that is expressed in many kinds of cancer. RFP forms a protein complex with HDAC1. The disruption of the RFP-HDAC1 complex has resulted in increased drug sensitivity in other cancers. We conclude that the downregulation of RFP or the disruption of the RFP/HDAC1 complex leads to an increase in TMZ efficacy in glioblastoma by changing histone modifications which lead to changes in cell division, cell cycle and apoptosis.

Super-enhancers (SEs) are unique areas of the genome which drive high-level of transcription and play a pivotal role in the cell physiology. Previous studies have established several important genes in cancer as SE-driven oncogenes. It is likely that oncogenes may hack the resident tissue regenerative program and interfere with SE-driven repair networks, leading to the specific pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) phenotype. Here, we used ChIP-Seq to identify the presence of SE in PDAC cell lines. Differential H3K27AC marks were identified at enhancer regions of genes including c-MYC, MED1, OCT-4, NANOG, and SOX2 that can act as SE in non-cancerous, cancerous and metastatic PDAC cell lines. GZ17-6.02 affects acetylation of the genes, reduces transcription of major transcription factors, sonic hedgehog pathway proteins, and stem cell markers. In accordance with the decrease in Oct-4 expression, ChIP-Seq revealed a significant decrease in the occupancy of OCT-4 in the entire genome after GZ17-6.02 treatment suggesting the possible inhibitory effect of GZ17-6.02 on PDAC. Hence, SE genes are associated with PDAC and targeting their regulation with GZ17-6.02 offers a novel approach for treatment., Competing Interests: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Dr. Animesh Dhar is a consultant of Genzada Pharmaceuticals and Dr. Cameron West is employed by Genzada Pharmaceuticals. Other authors have no conflicts of interest.

Summary The relationship between promoter proximal transcription factor-associated gene expression and super-enhancer-driven transcriptional programs are not well defined. However, their distinct genomic occupancy suggests a mechanism for specific and separable gene control. We explored the transcriptional and functional interrelationship between E2F transcription factors and BET transcriptional co-activators in multiple myeloma. We found that the transcription factor E2F1 and its heterodimerization partner DP1 represent a dependency in multiple myeloma cells. Global chromatin analysis reveals distinct regulatory axes for E2F and BETs, with E2F predominantly localized to active gene promoters of growth and/or proliferation genes and BETs disproportionately at enhancer-regulated tissue-specific genes. These two separate gene regulatory axes can be simultaneously targeted to impair the myeloma proliferative program, providing an important molecular mechanism for combination therapy. This study therefore suggests a sequestered cellular functional control that may be perturbed in cancer with potential for development of a promising therapeutic strategy. Graphical Abstract Highlights • E2F1 and its heterodimerization partner DP1 are required for myeloma cell proliferation • E2F1-DP1 heterodimers regulate promoter proximal transcription • E2F1 and BRD4 establish distinct regulatory axes in multiple myeloma • Combined inhibition of BRD4 and E2F co-operatively reduces myeloma tumor growth Uncontrolled proliferation is a hallmark of tumorigenesis and is associated with perturbed transcriptomic profile. Fulciniti et al. explored the interrelationship between E2F transcription factors and BET transcriptional co-activators in multiple myeloma, reporting the existence of two distinct regulatory axes that can be synergistically targeted to impact myeloma growth and survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

MYC-translocated T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is a rare subgroup of T-ALL associated with CDKN2A/B deletions, PTEN inactivation, and absence of NOTCH1 or FBXW7 mutations. This subtype of T-ALL has been associated with induction failure and aggressive disease. Identification of drug targets and mechanistic insights for this disease are still limited. Here, we established a human NOTCH1-independent MYC-translocated T-ALL cell line that maintains the genetic and phenotypic characteristics of the parental leukemic clone at diagnosis. The University of Padua T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia 13 (UP-ALL13) cell line has all the main features of the above described MYC-translocated T-ALL. Interestingly, UP-ALL13 was found to harbor a heterozygous R882H DNMT3A mutation typically found in myeloid leukemia. Chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with high-throughput sequencing for histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27) acetylation revealed numerous putative super-enhancers near key transcription factors, including MYC, MYB, and LEF1. Marked cytotoxicity was found following bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) inhibition with AZD5153, suggesting a strict dependency of this particular subtype of T-ALL on the activity of super-enhancers. Altogether, this cell line may be a useful model system for dissecting the signaling pathways implicated in NOTCH1-independent T-ALL and for the screening of targeted anti-leukemia agents specific for this T-ALL subgroup. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Super-enhancers are large clusters of enhancers that activate gene expression. Broad trimethyl histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4me3) often defines active tumor suppressor genes. However, how these epigenomic signatures are regulated for tumor suppression is little understood. Here we show that brain-specific knockout of the H3K4 methyltransferase MLL4 (a COMPASS-like enzyme, also known as KMT2D) in mice spontaneously induces medulloblastoma. Mll4 loss upregulates oncogenic Ras and Notch pathways while downregulating neuronal gene expression programs. MLL4 enhances DNMT3A-catalyzed DNA methylation and SIRT1/BCL6-mediated H4K16 deacetylation, which antagonize expression of Ras activators and Notch pathway components, respectively. Notably, Mll4 loss downregulates tumor suppressor genes (e.g., Dnmt3a and Bcl6 ) by diminishing broad H3K4me3 and super-enhancers and also causes widespread impairment of these epigenomic signatures during medulloblastoma genesis. These findings suggest an anti-tumor role for super-enhancers and provide a unique tumor-suppressive mechanism in which MLL4 is necessary to maintain broad H3K4me3 and super-enhancers at tumor suppressor genes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Spt6 coordinates nucleosome dis- and re-assembly, transcriptional elongation, and mRNA processing. Here, we report that depleting Spt6 in embryonic stem cells (ESCs) reduced expression of pluripotency factors, increased expression of cell-lineage-affiliated developmental regulators, and induced cell morphological and biochemical changes indicative of ESC differentiation. Selective downregulation of pluripotency factors upon Spt6 depletion may be mechanistically explained by its enrichment at ESC super-enhancers, where Spt6 controls histone H3K27 acetylation and methylation and super-enhancer RNA transcription. In ESCs, Spt6 interacted with the PRC2 core subunit Suz12 and prevented H3K27me3 accumulation at ESC super-enhancers and associated promoters. Biochemical as well as functional experiments revealed that Spt6 could compete for binding of the PRC2 methyltransferase Ezh2 to Suz12 and reduce PRC2 chromatin engagement. Thus, in addition to serving as a histone chaperone and transcription elongation factor, Spt6 counteracts repression by opposing H3K27me3 deposition at critical genomic regulatory regions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Cis -regulatory elements (CREs) are commonly recognized by correlative chromatin features, yet the molecular composition of the vast majority of CREs in chromatin remains unknown. Here, we describe a CRISPR affinity purification in situ of regulatory elements (CAPTURE) approach to unbiasedly identify locus-specific chromatin-regulating protein complexes and long-range DNA interactions. Using an in vivo biotinylated nuclease-deficient Cas9 protein and sequence-specific guide RNAs, we show high-resolution and selective isolation of chromatin interactions at a single-copy genomic locus. Purification of human telomeres using CAPTURE identifies known and new telomeric factors. In situ capture of individual constituents of the enhancer cluster controlling human β-globin genes establishes evidence for composition-based hierarchical organization. Furthermore, unbiased analysis of chromatin interactions at disease-associated cis -elements and developmentally regulated super-enhancers reveals spatial features that causally control gene transcription. Thus, comprehensive and unbiased analysis of locus-specific regulatory composition provides mechanistic insight into genome structure and function in development and disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Tissue stem cells contribute to tissue regeneration and wound repair through cellular programs that can be hijacked by cancer cells. Here, we investigate such a phenomenon in skin, where during homeostasis, stem cells of the epidermis and hair follicle fuel their respective tissues. We find that breakdown of stem cell lineage confinement—granting privileges associated with both fates—is not only hallmark but also functional in cancer development. We show that lineage plasticity is critical in wound repair, where it operates transiently to redirect fates. Investigating mechanism, we discover that irrespective of cellular origin, lineage infidelity occurs in wounding when stress-responsive enhancers become activated and override homeostatic enhancers that govern lineage specificity. In cancer, stress-responsive transcription factor levels rise, causing lineage commanders to reach excess. When lineage and stress factors collaborate, they activate oncogenic enhancers that distinguish cancers from wounds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Interactions between transcriptional promoters and their distal regulatory elements play an important role in transcriptional regulation; however, the extent to which these interactions are subject to rapid modulations in response to signals is unknown. Here, we use promoter capture Hi-C to demonstrate a rapid reorganization of promoter-anchored chromatin loops within 4 hr after inducing differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. The establishment of new promoter-enhancer loops is tightly coupled to activation of poised (histone H3 lysine 4 mono- and dimethylated) enhancers, as evidenced by the acquisition of histone H3 lysine 27 acetylation and the binding of MED1, SMC1, and P300 proteins to these regions, as well as to activation of target genes. Intriguingly, formation of loops connecting activated enhancers and promoters is also associated with extensive recruitment of corepressors such as NCoR and HDACs, indicating that this class of coregulators may play a previously unrecognized role during enhancer activation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transcriptional dysregulation of the MYC oncogene is among the most frequent events in aggressive tumor cells, and this is generally accomplished by acquisition of a super-enhancer somewhere within the 2.8 Mb TAD where MYC resides. We find that these diverse cancer-specific super-enhancers, differing in size and location, interact with the MYC gene through a common and conserved CTCF binding site located 2 kb upstream of the MYC promoter. Genetic perturbation of this enhancer-docking site in tumor cells reduces CTCF binding, super-enhancer interaction, MYC gene expression, and cell proliferation. CTCF binding is highly sensitive to DNA methylation, and this enhancer-docking site, which is hypomethylated in diverse cancers, can be inactivated through epigenetic editing with dCas9-DNMT. Similar enhancer-docking sites occur at other genes, including genes with prominent roles in multiple cancers, suggesting a mechanism by which tumor cell oncogenes can generally hijack enhancers. These results provide insights into mechanisms that allow a single target gene to be regulated by diverse enhancer elements in different cell types., (Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Super-enhancers are characterized by high levels of Mediator binding and are major contributors to the expression of their associated genes. They exhibit high levels of local chromatin interactions and a higher order of local chromatin organization. On the other hand, lncRNAs can localize to specific DNA sites by forming a RNA:DNA:DNA triplex, which in turn can contribute to local chromatin organization. In this paper, we characterize a new class of lncRNAs called super-lncRNAs that target super-enhancers and which can contribute to the local chromatin organization of the super-enhancers. Using a logistic regression model based on the number of RNA:DNA:DNA triplex sites a lncRNA forms within the super-enhancer, we identify 442 unique super-lncRNA transcripts in 27 different human cell and tissue types; 70% of these super-lncRNAs were tissue restricted. They primarily harbor a single triplex-forming repeat domain, which forms an RNA:DNA:DNA triplex with multiple anchor DNA sites (originating from transposable elements) within the super-enhancers. Super-lncRNAs can be grouped into 17 different clusters based on the tissue or cell lines they target. Super-lncRNAs in a particular cluster share common short structural motifs and their corresponding super-enhancer targets are associated with gene ontology terms pertaining to the tissue or cell line. Super-lncRNAs may use these structural motifs to recruit and transport necessary regulators (such as transcription factors and Mediator complexes) to super-enhancers, influence chromatin organization, and act as spatial amplifiers for key tissue-specific genes associated with super-enhancers., (© 2017 Soibam; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the RNA Society.)

The progressive restriction of differentiation potential from pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs) to tissue-specific stem cells involves widespread epigenetic reprogramming, including modulation of DNA methylation patterns. Skeletal muscle stem cells are required for the growth, maintenance, and regeneration of skeletal muscle. To investigate the contribution of DNA methylation to the establishment of the myogenic program, we analyzed ESCs, skeletal muscle stem cells in proliferating (myoblasts) and differentiating conditions (myotubes), and mature myofibers. About 1.000 differentially methylated regions were identified during muscle-lineage determination and terminal differentiation, mainly located in gene bodies and intergenic regions. As a whole, myogenic stem cells showed a gain of DNA methylation, while muscle differentiation was accompanied by loss of DNA methylation in CpG-poor regions. Notably, the hypomethylated regions in myogenic stem cells were neighbored by enhancer-type chromatin, suggesting the involvement of DNA methylation in the regulation of cell-type specific enhancers. Interestingly, we demonstrated the hypomethylation of the muscle cell-identity Myf5 super-enhancer only in muscle cells. Furthermore, we observed that upstream stimulatory factor 1 binding to Myf5 super-enhancer occurs upon DNA demethylation in myogenic stem cells. Taken altogether, we characterized the unique DNA methylation signature of skeletal muscle stem cells and highlighted the importance of DNA methylation-mediated regulation of cell identity Myf5 super-enhancer during cellular differentiation., (© 2015 AlphaMed Press.)