Search

Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for the vast majority of all diagnosed lung cancers. According to their histology, most NSCLCs are considered non-squamous cell carcinoma (NSCC), and up to 85% of the latter may lack either one of the two main actionable oncogenic drivers (i.e., EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements)., Objective: Our analysis aimed to describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of Spanish patients suffering from NSCC with no actionable oncogenic driver in daily clinical practice., Design: A retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive analysis., Methods: We analyzed the records of all Spanish patients with advanced NSCC diagnosed between January 2011 and January 2020 and included in the Spanish Thoracic Tumor Registry database. We evaluated the presence of metastasis and molecular profiling at the time of diagnosis and treatments received. We also assessed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) according to first-line treatment., Results: One thousand seven hundred ninety-seven Spanish patients with NSCC were included. They were mainly men (73.2%), smokers (current [44.4%] and former [44.4%]) and presented adenocarcinoma histology (97.6%). Most patients had at least one comorbidity (80.4%) and one metastatic site (96.8%), and a non-negligible number of those tested were PD-L1 positive (35.2%). Notably, the presence of liver metastasis indicated a shorter median OS and PFS than metastasis in other locations (p < 0.001). Chemotherapy was more often prescribed than immunotherapy as first-, second-, and third-line treatment in that period. In first-line, the OS rates were similar in patients receiving either regimen, but PFS rates significantly better in patients treated with immunotherapy (p = 0.026). Also, a high number of patients did not reach second- and third-line treatment, suggesting the failure of current early diagnostic measures and therapies., Conclusions: This analysis of the most lethal tumor in Spain could highlight the strengths and the weaknesses of its clinical management and set the ground for further advances and research., Competing Interests: Declarations Conflict of interest All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/and declare: EC has served as an advisor or consultant for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda; he has served as a speaker for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda; he has received grant support from MSD and has received honoraria from BMS, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda. DR-A has served as an advisor for MSD, Regeneron, BMS, GSK & Lilly has received honoraria for lectures from MSD, Roche, BMS, Novartis, Takeda, Lilly, and AstraZeneca; he has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche, MSD, Novartis and Sanofi. RL has received consulting fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and BMS; He has received payment or honoraria for lectures from Kyowa Kirin, Pierre-Fabre, Takeda, AstraZeneca, BMS, Novartis, Roche, and Pfizer; he has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from MSD. BM has served as an advisor for Roche, BMS, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda, and Abbvie; he has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche, Pfizer, Merck Serono, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and AstraZeneca. GS has received honoraria from Sanofi and has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Gilead and MSD. MAS has received honoraria from Takeda and Roche and has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche and PharmaMar. PC has received honoraria from Roche, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, and BMS and has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, and BMS. RB has served as an advisor for AstraZeneca, Roche, Amgen, and MSD; he has received honoraria from BMS, Roche, AstraZeneca, Lilly, MSD, and Pfizer; he has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca and Roche. JLGL has served as an advisor for MSD, Janssen-Cilag, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Amgen; he has received payment as an expert testimony from MSD, Janssen-Cilag, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Amgen; he has received honoraria from MSD, AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Astellas, and BMS; he has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from MSD, Takeda, BMS, Roche, Pfizer, and Janssen-Cilag. JBB has received grants from Pfizer and Roche; he has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, Roche, and Sanofi; he has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from MSD, Takeda, and Roche. AP has served as an advisor for AstraZeneca; he has received payment as an expert testimony from AstraZeneca, Takeda, Roche, BMS, MSD, and Merck; he has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Takeda, Roche, BMS, MSD, and Merck; he has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Takeda, AstraZeneca & Merck. MP has been awarded research grants from AstraZeneca, Roche, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Takeda; he has served as a consultant for AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, MSD, Roche, Takeda, and Thermo-Fisher. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest. Ethical approval and consent to participate Not required as this study only used anonymised and aggregated data. Consent for publication Not applicable. Informed consent The study was approved by Clinical Research Ethical Comitte from Puerta de Hierro Hospital, and patients alive in the moment their inclusion signed a informed consent., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO).)

Purpose: Phase III studies of intravenous amivantamab demonstrated efficacy across epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR )-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A subcutaneous formulation could improve tolerability and reduce administration time while maintaining efficacy., Patients and Methods: Patients with EGFR -mutated advanced NSCLC who progressed after osimertinib and platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive subcutaneous or intravenous amivantamab, both combined with lazertinib. Coprimary pharmacokinetic noninferiority end points were trough concentrations (C trough ; on cycle-2-day-1 or cycle-4-day-1) and cycle-2 area under the curve (AUC D1-D15 ). Key secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS) was a predefined exploratory end point., Results: Overall, 418 patients underwent random assignment (subcutaneous group, n = 206; intravenous group, n = 212). Geometric mean ratios of C trough for subcutaneous to intravenous amivantamab were 1.15 (90% CI, 1.04 to 1.26) at cycle-2-day-1 and 1.42 (90% CI, 1.27 to 1.61) at cycle-4-day-1; the cycle-2 AUC D1-D15 was 1.03 (90% CI, 0.98 to 1.09). ORR was 30% in the subcutaneous and 33% in the intravenous group; median PFS was 6.1 and 4.3 months, respectively. OS was significantly longer in the subcutaneous versus intravenous group (hazard ratio for death, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.92; nominal P = .02). Fewer patients in the subcutaneous group experienced infusion-related reactions (IRRs; 13% v 66%) and venous thromboembolism (9% v 14%) versus the intravenous group. Median administration time for the first infusion was reduced to 4.8 minutes (range, 0-18) for subcutaneous amivantamab and to 5 hours (range, 0.2-9.9) for intravenous amivantamab. During cycle-1-day-1, 85% and 52% of patients in the subcutaneous and intravenous groups, respectively, considered treatment convenient; the end-of-treatment rates were 85% and 35%, respectively., Conclusion: Subcutaneous amivantamab-lazertinib demonstrated noninferiority to intravenous amivantamab-lazertinib, offering a consistent safety profile with reduced IRRs, increased convenience, and prolonged survival.

In Spain, lung cancer (LC) is the fourth most common cancer. Managing LC involves different professionals, and cooperative and coordinated work is crucial. Therefore, important decisions are better made by Multidisciplinary Thoracic Tumour Boards (MTTBs). On the other hand, certification systems have proven to improve the structure of care, ultimately having a positive impact on patient survival. Herein, a multidisciplinary working group of 11 experts (a Radiologist, a Thoracic Surgeon, a Pulmonologist, a Radiotherapy Oncologist, four Medical Oncologists, a Hospital Managing Director, a Cytologist, and a Molecular Biologist specialist) proposed a standard to certify and evaluate MTTBs. The following components were suggested for the standard: minimum requirements for the MTTB, a mixed model developed in two stages (preparation and audit), a structure comprising three groups of indicators (Strategic and Management, Support, and Operational), three certification levels, and an audit process. In our opinion, certifying MTTBs is critical to improve the standard of care for LC patients., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO).)

Background: Early detection is crucial to improve lung cancer survival rates. Delays in diagnosis might negatively impact the prognosis of the disease. This study aims to analyze the diagnostic delay in lung cancer patients and describe if there is an association between delay and survival., Methods: The data source used was the Thoracic Tumor Registry of the Spanish Lung Cancer Group. This analysis was restricted to lung cancer cases with information on the first date of consultation by symptoms and date of diagnosis. The delay was calculated as the number of days between the two dates. A descriptive analysis was performed, and ordinal logistic regressions were fitted with delay as the dependent variable. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression were performed., Results: 22,755 lung cancer cases were included. Never smokers were 1.16 (95%CI: 1.06-1.27) times more likely to register longer delay than smokers. Stage 0-I-II cases had a 3.09 (95%CI: 2.88-3.32) higher risk of longer delay compared to III-IV stages. Overall, 5-year survival rate after diagnosis was 23.64% (95%CI: 22.88-24.41). In those categorized as having the shortest delay 5-year survival was 17.67% (95%CI: 16.31-19.07) and in the extreme delay it was 32.98% (95%CI: 31.28-34.69) (p<0.001). Adjusted mortality risk was higher in those with the shortest delay (HR 1.36, CI95%: 1.30-1.43) in comparison with the extreme delay., Conclusions: Diagnostic delay is short among Spanish lung cancer patients, indicating a relatively quick diagnostic process. Extreme delays appear to be associated with higher survival rates, possibly attributed to slow-growing tumors, earlier stage at diagnosis or basically the natural history of this disease., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Lung Cancer (LC) is a multifactorial disease for which the role of genetic susceptibility has become increasingly relevant. Our aim was to use artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze differences between patients with LC based on family history of cancer (FHC)., Materials and Methods: From August 2016 to June 2020 clinical information was obtained from Thoracic Tumors Registry (TTR), a nationwide database sponsored by the Spanish Lung Cancer Group. In addition to descriptive statistical analysis, an AI-assisted analysis was performed. The German Technical Information Library supported the merging of data from the electronic medical records and database of the TTR. The results of the AI-assisted analysis were reported using Knowledge Graph, Unified Schema and descriptive and predictive analyses., Results: Analyses were performed in two phases: first, conventional statistical analysis including 11,684 patients of those 5,806 had FHC. Median overall survival (OS) for the global population was 23 months (CI 95 %: 21.39-24.61) in patients with FHC versus 21 months (CI 95 %: 19.53-22.48) in patients without FHC (NFHC), p < 0.001. The second AI-assisted analysis included 5,788 patients of those 939 had FHC. 58.48 % of women with FHC had LC. 9.53 % of patients had an EGFR or HER2 mutation or ALK translocation and at least one relative with cancer. A family history of LC was associated with an increased risk of smoking-related LC. Non-smokers with a family history of LC were more likely to have an EGFR mutation in NSCLC. In Bayesian network analysis, 55 % of patients with a family history of LC and never-smokers had an EGFR mutation., Conclusion: In our population, the incidence of LC in patients with a FHC is higher in women and younger patients. FHC is a risk factor and predictor of LC development, especially in people ≤ 50 years. These results were confirmed by conventional statistics and AI-assisted analysis., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr. Calvo reported receiving personal fees from Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Pfizer, Sanofi and AMGEN outside the submitted work; being a consultant or advisor and speakerś bureau for Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Merck Sharp & Dohme, AstraZeneca, Takeda Sanofi and AMGEN and receiving travel, accommodations, and expenses from Takeda, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb and Merck Sharp & Dohme. Dr. Carcereny reported receiving consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme; payment or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer and receiving travel, accommodations, and expenses from Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer. Dr. Cobo reported receiving consulting fees from Novartis, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Lilly, Takeda, Pfizer, Kyowa, Sanofi, Jansen; payment or honoraria from Novartis, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Lilly, Takeda, Kyowa, Pierre-Fabre, Novocure, Sanofi, Jansen and receiving travel, accommodations, and expenses from AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Lilly, Pierre-Fabre and being advisor for Gilead. Dr. López-Castro reported receiving consulting fees from Takeda, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Bristol Myers Squibb; payment or honoraria from Pfizer, Pierre-Fabre, Takeda, Roche, Novartis Jansen and receiving travel, accommodations, and expenses from Roche, Takeda, Novartis and Merck Sharp & Dohme. Dr. Bernabé reported receiving grant from Roche; payment or honoraria from Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, AMGEN, Takeda, Astrazeneca and receiving travel, accommodations, and expenses from Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb and being advisor for Takeda, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb and Astrazeneca. Dr. Garcia-Campelo reported receiving consulting fees from AMGEN, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Janssen, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, Pfizer; payment or honoraria from AMGEN, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Janssen, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda and receiving travel, accommodations, and expenses from AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer and being advisor for AstraZeneca. Dr. del Barco reported receiving travel, accommodations and expenses from Merck Sharp & Dohme. Dr. Bosch-Barrera reported receiving grants from Pfizer and Roche outside the submitted work; payment or honoraria from Astrazeneca, Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Sanofi and receiving travel, accommodations, and expenses from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche and Takeda. Dr. Provencio reported receiving grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, Roche, Pfizer, and Merck Sharp & Dohme outside the submitted work; being a consultant or advisor for Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, AstraZeneca, and Takeda; being on the speakers’ bureau for Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, AstraZeneca, and Merck Sharp & Dohme; receiving research funds from Pierre Fabre, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bristol Myers Squibb; and receiving travel, accommodations, and expenses from Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, and AstraZeneca. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objectives: The S-REAL study aimed to assess the effectiveness of durvalumab as consolidation therapy after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in a real-world cohort of patients with locally advanced, unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) included in a Spanish early access program (EAP)., Methods: In this multicentre, observational, retrospective study we analysed data from patients treated in 39 Spanish hospitals, who started intravenous durvalumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) between September 2017 and December 2018. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included patient characterization and adverse events of special interest (AESI)., Results: A total of 244 patients were followed up for a median of 21.9 months [range 1.2-34.7]. Median duration of durvalumab was 45.5 weeks (11.4 months) [0-145]. Median PFS was 16.7 months (95% CI 12.2-25). No remarkable differences in PFS were observed between patients with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 1% or < 1% (16.7 versus 15.6 months, respectively). However, PFS was higher in patients who had received prior concurrent CRT (cCRT) versus sequential CRT (sCRT) (20.6 versus 9.4 months). AESIs leading to durvalumab discontinuation were registered in 11.1% of patients., Conclusions: These results are in line with prior published evidence and confirm the benefits of durvalumab in the treatment of LA-NSCLC patients in a real-world setting. We also observed a lower incidence of important treatment-associated toxicities, such as pneumonitis, compared with the pivotal phase III PACIFIC clinical study., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO).)

Objectives: Cancer is a disease of old age; however, most studies usually included minority of patients fit elderly. The purpose is to investigate the clinical characteristics and genetic information of patients with thoracic tumors who are 80 years old or older compared to those under 80 years old., Study Design and Methods: The Thoracic Tumor Registry (TTR) is a Spanish observational, prospective cohort study that included patients diagnosed with thoracic tumors. Data were collected from medical records related to sociodemographic, epidemiological, clinical, molecular/genetic, and treatment outcome variables., Results: The total number of patients, recruited from August 2016 to April 2023, was 26.193 (93,1 % were younger than 80 years and 6,9 % were 80 years or older). In the group of older patients: the male ratio increased (72,9 % vs. 80 %); the number of elderly people who had never smoked or were ex-smokers increased (9,9 % vs. 21,1 % and 44,8 % vs. 61,3 %, respectively) and the number of current smokers decreased (43,3 % vs. 17,5 %); had higher ECOG performance status at diagnosis (for ECOG ≥ 2, 15 % vs. 32,9 %), and there were more patients with previous cancer (17,3 % vs. 28 %). The proportion of men is higher than that of women (73 % vs. 27 % in <80 years and 80 % vs. 20 % in ≥80 years). For all biomarkers, the proportion of patients who had a molecular determination was lower in older patients. There were no differences in terms of alterations in the biomarkers tested; except for EGFR, for which the positivity rate was higher in patients aged 80 years and older (25 % vs. 15,3 %)., Conclusion: The proportion of older patients with targeted mutations is higher. So, at least at diagnosis, it should be proceeded in a standard way. Then, when it comes to treatment, comorbidities and patient's baseline situation should be considered., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02941458., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) conducted a review to analyze the barriers to access to innovative targeted therapies for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in clinical practice in Spain., Methods: Review all relevant content published on websites of European Commission, European Medicines Agency, and Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Products regarding the authorization and access to oncology treatments., Results: More than 20 targeted therapies are available to treat different molecular alterations in patients with NSCLC. European Commission has approved treatments for genomic alterations involving the following genes: ALK, RET, ROS1, EGFR, BRAF, NTRK, KRAS, MET. However, the availability of these therapies in Spain is not complete, as innovative treatments are not reimbursed or funded late, with only five of these alterations currently covered by National Health System., Conclusion: SLCG considers imperative to improve the access in Spain to innovative treatments for NSCLC to reduce inequity across European countries., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and genetic characteristics of young lung cancer cases, and to compare them with those of older cases., Methods: We used the Thoracic Tumors Registry (TTR) as a data source representative of lung cancer cases diagnosed in Spain, and included all cases registered until 9/01/2023 which had information on age at diagnosis or the data needed to calculate it. We performed a descriptive statistical analysis and fitted logistic regressions to analyze how different characteristics influenced being a younger lung cancer patient., Results: A total of 26,336 subjects were included. Lung cancer cases <50 years old had a higher probability of being women (OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.21-1.57), being in stage III or IV (OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.08-1.62), not having comorbidities (OR: 5.21; 95% CI: 4.59-5.91), presenting with symptoms at diagnosis (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.29-1.81), and having ALK translocation (OR: 7.61; 95% CI: 1.25-46.32) and HER2 mutation (OR: 5.71; 95% CI: 1.34-24.33), compared with subjects ≥50 years. Among subjects <35 years old (n=61), our study observed a higher proportion of women (59.0% vs. 26.6%; p<0.001), never smokers (45.8% vs. 10.3%; p<0.001), no comorbidities (21.3% vs. 74.0%; p<0.001); ALK translocation (33.3% vs. 4.4%; p<0.001) and ROS1 mutation (14.3% vs. 2.3%; p=0.01), compared with subjects ≥35 years., Conclusions: Lung cancer displays differences by age at diagnosis which may have important implications for its clinical management., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of the study was to ascertain the percentage of Spanish lung cancer cases that would fulfil the lung cancer screening inclusion criteria recommended by the United States Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF) in 2013 and 2021., Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out. All lung cancer cases registered in the Thoracic Tumor Registry with data on date of birth, date of diagnosis, smoking habit, number of pack-years and time elapsed since smoking cessation were included., Results: The study included 15 006 patients diagnosed with lung cancer in Spain between 2016 and 2022. Eligibility to participate in screening increased from 53.7% to 63.5% (an increase of 9.8%) according to the 2013 and 2021 recommendations, respectively. The percentage of eligible men rose by 9.2 percentage points with the 2021 versus 2013 recommendations, whereas this rise was 11.5 percentage points in women. Under the 2021 recommendations, 36.6% of women and 5.3% of men would not have fulfilled the screening inclusion criteria due to being never-smokers; 14.9% of women and 11.0% of men would not have fulfilled the age criterion; and 27.0% of ex-smokers among women compared to 35.6% among men would not have been eligible due to >15 years having elapsed since smoking cessation., Conclusions: In Spain, over one-third of lung cancer cases could not be detected through screening, by virtue of not meeting the most recent inclusion criteria stated by the USPSTF. The degree of fulfilment in a potential nationwide screening programme should be analysed, with the aim of establishing inclusion criteria in line with each country's context., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: A. Ruano-Ravina is an associate editor of this journal. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)

Background: The burden of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains high in Spain, with lung cancer accounting for 20% of cancer-related deaths annually. Programs such as the Spanish Thoracic Tumour Registry (TTR) and the global I-O Optimise initiative have been developed to observe patients in clinical practice with the aim of improving outcomes. This analysis examined treatment patterns and survival in patients with stage III NSCLC from the TTR. These patients represent a heterogenous group with complex treatment pathways., Methods: The TTR is an ongoing, observational, prospective, and retrospective cohort multicentre study (NCT02941458) that follows patients with thoracic cancer in Spain. Adults aged ≥18 years with stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC enrolled in the TTR between 01 Jan 2010 and 31 Oct 2019 were included in this analysis. Initial treatment received was described by cancer stage and histology (squamous and non-squamous NSCLC). Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated over a 5-year period., Results: A total of 1,838 patients were included in the cohort, including 1,082 with stage IIIA (58.9%) and 756 with stage IIIB (41.1%). Median follow-up was 18.3 months. The median age of patients was 66 years, and most had non-squamous NSCLC (54.0%), were male (81.2%), and were active or former smokers (93.4%). Overall, 26.3% of patients received surgical resection (37.0% for stage IIIA and 11.1% for stage IIIB). The most frequent initial treatment received was concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage IIIA (30.2%) and stage IIIB (37.0%) patients. Median OS was lower in patients with stage IIIB than stage IIIA (28 vs. 37 months) disease and was lower for patients with squamous than non-squamous histology (19 vs. 26 months). Median PFS and OS varied when patients were stratified by initial treatment., Conclusions: This TTR analysis describes the clinical reality surrounding the initial management and survival outcomes for stage III NSCLC in Spain and presents survival outcomes comparable with other real-world evidence. It provides insights into the diverse approaches used before the availability of immunotherapies and targeted treatments in the non-metastatic NSCLC setting., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-23-176/coif). MP served as an unpaid editorial board member of Translational Lung Cancer Research from October 2021 to September 2023. All authors report that this work was supported by Bristol Myers Squibb. MP reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events and support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Roche and Takeda. RLC reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Aristo, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Roche and Takeda; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Novartis, Roche and Takeda. VC reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche and Takeda. DRA reports consulting fees and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, MSD, Novartis and Roche. DRA also reports support for attending meetings and/or travel from MSD, Novartis and Roche. BM reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Roche and Sanofi. BM also reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Roche and Takeda; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca and MSD. JBB reports institutionally awarded grants and personal fees from Pfizer and Roche. JBB also reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Roche and Sanofi; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from MSD, Roche and Takeda. ER is an employee of IQVIA. RC, Carlos Chaib, JP, LV and MJD are employees of Bristol Myers Squibb, the study sponsor. Carlos Chaib, JP and LV also report stock ownership in Bristol Myers Squibb. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare., (2023 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The Atezo-Brain study evaluated atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with untreated brain metastases, a population traditionally excluded from trials., Methods: This single-arm phase II clinical trial enrolled patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with untreated brain metastases without neurologic symptoms or asymptomatic with medical treatment. Dexamethasone was allowed up to 4 mg once daily. Atezolizumab plus carboplatin and pemetrexed was given for four to six cycles followed by atezolizumab plus pemetrexed until progression for a maximum of 2 years. The primary end points were to determine the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 12 weeks and the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events during the first 9 weeks. Intracranial outcomes were assessed using response assessment in neuro-oncology brain metastases criteria., Results: Forty patients were enrolled and 22 (55%) were receiving corticosteroids at baseline. The overall 12-week PFS rate was 62.2% (95% credibility interval [CrI], 47.1 to 76.2). The rate of grade 3/4 adverse events during the first 9 weeks was 27.5%. Most neurologic events were grade 1 and 2 but five patients (12.5%) experienced grade 3-4 neurologic events. With a median follow-up of 31 months, intracranial median PFS was 6.9 months and response rate was 42.7% (95% CrI, 28.1 to 57.9). Systemic median PFS was 8.9 months and response rate was 45% (95% CrI, 28.1 to 57.9). The median overall survival (OS) was 11.8 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 16.9) and the 2-year OS rate was 27.5% (95% CI, 16.6 to 45.5)., Conclusion: Atezolizumab plus carboplatin and pemetrexed demonstrates activity in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with untreated brain metastases with an acceptable safety profile.

Purpose: Stratifying patients with cancer according to risk of relapse can personalize their care. In this work, we provide an answer to the following research question: How to use machine learning to estimate probability of relapse in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)?, Materials and Methods: For predicting relapse in 1,387 patients with early-stage (I-II) NSCLC from the Spanish Lung Cancer Group data (average age 65.7 years, female 24.8%, male 75.2%), we train tabular and graph machine learning models. We generate automatic explanations for the predictions of such models. For models trained on tabular data, we adopt SHapley Additive exPlanations local explanations to gauge how each patient feature contributes to the predicted outcome. We explain graph machine learning predictions with an example-based method that highlights influential past patients., Results: Machine learning models trained on tabular data exhibit a 76% accuracy for the random forest model at predicting relapse evaluated with a 10-fold cross-validation (the model was trained 10 times with different independent sets of patients in test, train, and validation sets, and the reported metrics are averaged over these 10 test sets). Graph machine learning reaches 68% accuracy over a held-out test set of 200 patients, calibrated on a held-out set of 100 patients., Conclusion: Our results show that machine learning models trained on tabular and graph data can enable objective, personalized, and reproducible prediction of relapse and, therefore, disease outcome in patients with early-stage NSCLC. With further prospective and multisite validation, and additional radiological and molecular data, this prognostic model could potentially serve as a predictive decision support tool for deciding the use of adjuvant treatments in early-stage lung cancer.

Objective: In Spain, due to the lack of data at national level a lung cancer registry, the Thoracic Tumour Registry (TTR), was created. Such registry should demonstrate comparability with population-based data to ensure representativeness at population level. The aim is to compare the socio-demographic characteristics of the TTR with incidence data from the Red de Registros de Cáncer (REDECAN) and mortality data from the Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE)., Method: Lung cancer data sources available to date, REDECAN and INE, were used. Lung cancer cases overall and disaggregated by sex and age groups were collected from each source of information and data were compared for the period 2017-2020. Sex and age group proportions of TTR were calculated for both databases (which collect incidence and mortality data), for the entire study period and broken down by year., Results: A total of 17,109 incident lung cancer cases from the TTR, 58,668 estimated incident cases from REDECAN and 88,083 deaths registered from INE between 2017 and 2020 were included. In terms of sex, the proportions are very similar between the three sources and the differences do not exceed 4%. In terms of age, the differences are not large, being larger for mortality data in the older age group from the INE versus the TTR., Conclusions: The TTR seems to be representative of lung cancer cases diagnosed in Spain between 2019 and 2020, both by sex and age. This allows us to accurately characterise the status of this disease, which is the leading cause of cancer death in Spain, and that the analysis of results obtained from the RTT can be applied to cases of lung cancer diagnosed in our country., (Copyright © 2022 SESPAS. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: The survival of patients with lung cancer has substantially increased in the last decade by about 15%. This increase is, basically, due to targeted therapies available for advanced stages and the emergence of immunotherapy itself. This work aims to study the situation of biomarker testing in Spain., Patients and Methods: The Thoracic Tumours Registry (TTR) is an observational, prospective, registry-based study that included patients diagnosed with lung cancer and other thoracic tumours, from September 2016 to 2020. This TTR study was sponsored by the Spanish Lung Cancer Group (GECP) Foundation, an independent, scientific, multidisciplinary oncology society that coordinates more than 550 experts and 182 hospitals across the Spanish territory., Results: Nine thousand two hundred thirty-nine patients diagnosed with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between 2106 and 2020 were analysed. 7,467 (80.8%) were non-squamous and 1,772 (19.2%) were squamous. Tumour marker testing was performed in 85.0% of patients with non-squamous tumours vs 56.3% in those with squamous tumours (p-value < 0.001). The global testing of EGFR, ALK, and ROS1 was 78.9, 64.7, 35.6% respectively, in non-squamous histology. PDL1 was determined globally in the same period (46.9%), although if we focus on the last 3 years it exceeds 85%. There has been a significant increase in the last few years of all determinations and there are even close to 10% of molecular determinations that do not yet have targeted drug approval but will have it in the near future. 4,115 cases had a positive result (44.5%) for either EGFR, ALK, KRAS, BRAF, ROS1, or high PDL1., Conclusions: Despite the lack of a national project and standard protocol in Spain that regulates the determination of biomarkers, the situation is similar to other European countries. Given the growing number of different determinations and their high positivity, national strategies are urgently needed to implement next-generation sequencing (NGS) in an integrated and cost-effective way in lung cancer., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: At present, we did not find any articles that studied seroprevalence and its persistence several months later in lung cancer patients in the setting of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Most patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) go on to develop antibodies (Abs) against viral proteins. However, it is not known how long these Abs last nor whether cancer treatments could affect the duration of immune response., Methods: This prospective, longitudinal, multicenter serological study in the setting of SARS-CoV-2 infection was carried out in 50 Spanish hospitals. Eligibility criterion was the diagnosis of any lung cancer. The determination of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Abs was performed by qualitative immuno-enzymatic assay using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit from NovaLisa whose Abs target the recombinant antigen N of the nucleocapsid of SARS-CoV-2. The first Ab determination was performed between April 21 and June 3, 2020. The second Ab determination was performed in all previously seropositive patients, between September 10 and November 20, 2020. Study objectives were to prospectively determine seroprevalence in unselected lung cancer patients during the first wave of the pandemic; the persistence of immunity; protection or lack thereof against reinfection; and the influence of treatments on maintenance or loss of immunity., Results: Of 1,500 patients, 128 were seropositive, overall prevalence of 8.5% seropositivity [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.2-10.1%]. Seventy-five percent were in active cancer treatment. Forty-seven point seven percent of IgG positive participants had experienced a symptomatic illness suspected of being infected with SARS-CoV-2 (95% CI: 38.8-56.6%). A second determination was performed on average 4.5 months later [interquartile range (IQR), 4.0-5.0 months] and obtained for 104 of the initially seropositive patients (81%), it could not be obtained in 24 patients, the majority due to death caused by disease progression (73%). In the second determination, IgG was not detected in 30.8% of patients. The severity of the infection, the need for hospitalization (P=0.032) and the presence of symptoms at diagnosis (P=0.02) were associated with persistence of immunity in the second determination. No variables or treatments received were associated with Abs loss., Conclusions: Immunity against SARS-CoV-2 does not appear to be compromised by treatment and persists beyond 4 months. Neither do mortality rates appear to be particularly high in this unselected population., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04407143., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-21-504/coif). MP reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from BMS, Roche and Astrazeneca and personal fees from MSD and TAKEDA and unrelated to the present study. CA reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Roche, personal fees and non-financial support from Pierre Fabre and personal fees from Astrazeneca, BMS, MSD and Novartis and unrelated to the present study. MG reports personal fees from Roche, MSD and BMS and unrelated to the present study. GB reports personal fees and non-financial support from Roche and AstraZeneca, personal fees from Sanofi and non-financial support from MSD, Novartis, BMS, MERCK and unrelated to the present study. AE reports personal fees from Roche and MSD and non-financial support from BMS, Lilly, Pharmamar and unrelated to the present study. VC reports personal fees from Roche, BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca and unrelated to the present study. HA reports personal fees from AstraZeneca and unrelated to the present study. JC reports personal fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, Boehringer, BMS, Novartis and Pfizer and unrelated to the present study. MM reports personal fees an non-financial supports from BMS, AstraZeneca, Boehringer and Roche, personal fees from Kyowa Kyrin, Pierre Fabre, Novartis and Sanofi and non-financial support from MSD and Lilly and unrelated to the present study. OJV reports personal fees from: Boehringer, BMS, MSD, Roche, AstraZeneca, Lilly and Takeda and unrelated to the present study. CLG reports personal fees from MSD; Novartis, Kyowa Karin and unrelated to the present study. JBB reports grant and personal fees from Pfizer, grant from Pierre Fabre, personal fees from Roche, MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca, Novartis and Boehringer and unrelated to the present study. XM reports grant and personal fees from BMS, personal fees and non-financial support from Roche, personal fees from AstraZeneca and unrelated to the present study. FdAA reports personal fees from Takeda, Mylan, Archimedes, Boehringer and unrelated to the present study. EN reports grant and personal fees from BMS and MERCK, personal fees from Roche, Pfizer, MSD, AstraZeneca, Lilly and Amgen and unrelated to the present study. SC reports personal fees and non-finacial support from Roche and personal fees from Boehringer and unrelated to the present study. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2022 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lung cancer causes approximately 25% of all cancer deaths. Despite its relevance, few studies have analyzed differences by sex at the time of diagnosis in terms of symptoms, stage, age or smoking status. We aim to assess if there are differences between men and women on these characteristics at diagnosis., Methods: We analyzed the Thoracic Tumour Registry (TTR), sponsored by the Spanish Lung Cancer Group using a case-series design. This is a nationwide registry of lung cancer cases which started recruitment in 2016. For each case included, clinicians fulfilled an electronic record registering demographic data, symptoms, exposure to lung cancer risk factors, and treatment received in detail. We compared men and women using descriptive statistics., Results: A total of 13,590 participants took part in this study, 25.6% women. Women were 4 years younger than men (64 vs. 69), and men had smoked more frequently. Adenocarcinoma was the most frequent histological type in both sexes. Stage IV at diagnosis was 50.8% in women compared to 43.6% in men. Weight loss/anorexia/asthenia was the most frequent symptom in both sexes and there were no differences in the number of symptoms at diagnosis. There were no relevant differences in the frequency or number of symptoms by sex when non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were analyzed separately. Smoking status did not appear to cause different lung cancer presentation in men compared to women., Conclusions: There seems to be no differences in lung cancer characteristics by sex at the time at diagnosis on stage, specific symptoms or number of symptoms., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-21-559). MP serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Translational Lung Cancer Research. MP and VCJ receive consulting fees from BMS, ROCHE, ASTRAZENECA, MSD, Boehringer. AE receives consulting fees from ROCHE, MSD, AstraZeneca. GB receives consulting fees from ROCHE, SANOFI. MG receives consulting fees from ROCHE, MSD, Bristol Myers. CAR receives consulting fees from ROCHE, MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pierre Fabre. ÓJ receives consulting fees from Boehringer, BMS, Merch, Roche, Astrazeneca, Lilly, Takeda. MD receives consulting fees from Astrazeneca, BMS, Boehriguer, MSD, Pfizer, Roche. JMT receives consulting fees from BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca, Boehringer. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2021 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.)

Background: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease with high metastatic potential and poor prognosis. Due to its low prevalence, epidemiological and clinical information of SCLC patients retrieved from lung cancer registries is scarce., Patients and Methods: This was an observational multicenter study that enrolled patients with lung cancer and thoracic tumors, recruited from August 2016 to January 2020 at 50 Spanish hospitals. Demographic and clinical data, treatment patterns and survival of SCLC patients included in the Thoracic Tumor Registry (TTR) were analyzed., Results: With a total of 956 cases, the age of 64.7 ± 9.1 years, 78.6% were men, 60.6% smokers, and ECOG PS 0, 1 or ≥ 2 in 23.1%, 53.0% and 23.8% of cases, respectively. Twenty percent of patients had brain metastases at the diagnosis. First-line chemotherapy (CT), mainly carboplatin or cisplatin plus etoposide was administered to >90% of patients. In total, 36.0% and 13.8% of patients received a second and third line of CT, respectively. Median overall survival was 9.5 months (95% CI 8.8-10.2 months), with an estimated rate of 70.3% (95% CI 67.2-73.4%), 38.9% (95% CI 35.4-42.4%), and 14.8% (95% CI 11.8-17.8%) at 6, 12 and 24 months respectively. Median progression-free survival was 6.3 months. Higher mortality and progression rates were significantly associated with male sex, older age, smoking habit, and ECOG PS 1-2. Long-term survival (> 2 years) was confirmed in 6.6% of patients, showing a positive correlation with better ECOG PS, poor smoking and absence of certain metastases at diagnosis., Conclusion: This study provides an updated overview of the clinical situation and treatment landscape of ES-SCLC in Spain. Our results might assist oncologists to improve current clinical practice towards a better prognosis for these patients., Competing Interests: Francisco Aparisi has received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Mylan, Archimedes, and Takeda, outside the submitted work. Manuel Domine has received honoraria for lectures and advisory boards from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Pfizer, and Roche, outside the submitted work. Joaquim Bosch-Barrera has received grants from Roche-Genentech, Pfizer, and Pierre Fabre; and honoraria from Roche-Genentech, MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Boehringer-Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Mariano Provencio has received grants and non-financial support from BMS, Roche, and AstraZeneca; and honoraria from BMS, Roche, AstraZeneca, MSD, and Takeda, outside the submitted work. Fernando Franco, Enric Carcereny, María Guirado, Ana L. Ortega, Rafael López-Castro, Delvys Rodríguez-Abreu, Rosario García-Campelo, Edel del Barco, Oscar Juan, Jose L. González-Larriba, Jose M. Trigo, Manuel Cobo, Sara Cerezo, Julia Calzas, Bartomeu Massutí, Paula García Coves, and Marta Domènech declare no conflict of interest. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Background: Biologicals, in combination with chemotherapy, are recommended as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, evidence guiding the appropriate management of older patients with mCRC is limited., Objective: This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes in older versus younger patients with mCRC who received first-line biological therapy., Methods: This retrospective analysis used pooled data from five trials undertaken by the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours. All were studies of adults with advanced CRC who received first-line treatment with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, cetuximab or panitumumab, stratified by age (≥ 65 vs. < 65 years). Endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) and safety., Results: In total, 999 patients from five studies were included in the analysis: 480 (48%) were aged ≥ 65 years, and 519 (52%) were aged < 65 years. Median PFS did not differ significantly between patients aged ≥ 65 and < 65 years (9.9 vs. 9.4 months; hazard ratio [HR] 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-1.17). Median OS was significantly shorter in older than in younger patients (21.3 vs. 25.0 months; HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.04-1.41). There was no significant difference between older and younger patients in ORR (59 vs. 62%). Patients aged ≥ 65 years experienced significantly more treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events (61.67%) than did patients aged < 65 years (45.86%)., Conclusions: Biologicals plus chemotherapy is an effective first-line treatment option for selected patients aged ≥ 65 years with mCRC and has a manageable safety profile and efficacy comparable to that observed in younger patients.

Several platforms for noninvasive EGFR testing are currently used in the clinical setting with sensitivities ranging from 30% to 100%. Prospective studies evaluating agreement and sources for discordant results remain lacking. Herein, seven methodologies including two next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based methods, three high-sensitivity PCR-based platforms, and two FDA-approved methods were compared using 72 plasma samples, from EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients progressing on a first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). NGS platforms as well as high-sensitivity PCR-based methodologies showed excellent agreement for EGFR-sensitizing mutations (K = 0.80-0.89) and substantial agreement for T790M testing (K = 0.77 and 0.68, respectively). Mutant allele frequencies (MAFs) obtained by different quantitative methods showed an excellent reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.86-0.98). Among other technical factors, discordant calls mostly occurred at mutant allele frequencies (MAFs) ≤ 0.5%. Agreement significantly improved when discarding samples with MAF ≤ 0.5%. EGFR mutations were detected at significantly lower MAFs in patients with brain metastases, suggesting that these patients risk for a false-positive result. Our results support the use of liquid biopsies for noninvasive EGFR testing and highlight the need to systematically report MAFs., (© 2020 The Authors. Published by FEBS Press and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Lung cancer is currently the leading cause of cancer death. Despite its high incidence and mortality, there are few studies describing its symptoms at diagnosis broken down by tumour stage and tobacco use. Accordingly, this study was proposed to describe the frequency of the most common symptoms of non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) at diagnosis, with a breakdown by stage and tobacco use., Patients and Methods: Cases were collected from the Spanish Thoracic Tumour Registry, a nationwide registry sponsored by the Spanish Lung Cancer Group. More than 50 hospitals recruited histologically confirmed lung cancer cases and information was gathered through personal interview plus data contained in the electronic clinical record. There were no data available on the lag between the appearance of the first symptoms and diagnosis of lung cancer., Results: A total of 9876 patients (74% male, median age 64 years) were recruited from 2016 to 2019. Of these, 12.5% presented with SCLC. Stage IV was the most frequent stage at diagnosis (46.6%), and the most frequent symptom was cough (33.9%), followed by dyspnoea (26.7%). No symptom was present in 59% of patients diagnosed in stage I; 40% of stage I patients presented with at least one symptom, while 27.7% of patients in stage IV had no symptoms at diagnosis. Cough was the most frequent symptom in SCLC (40.6%), followed by dyspnoea (34.3%). The number of symptoms was similar across the respective smoking categories in SCLC, and differences between the symptoms analysed did not exceed 7% in any case., Conclusion: The absence of the most frequent symptoms (ie, cough, pain, dyspnoea) should not lead to a decision to rule out the presence of lung cancer. A relevant percentage of stage IV patients displayed no symptoms at diagnosis., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Introduction: Longitudinal evaluation of mutations in blood samples was a prespecified secondary objective in the BELIEF trial of erlotinib and bevacizumab in advanced EGFR-positive NSCLC. Here, we report the testing results and explore the correlation of EGFR status in blood with clinical outcomes., Methods: Blood samples were prospectively collected from patients at baseline, at response evaluation, and at progression and sent to a central laboratory. Circulating free DNA was purified and EGFR mutations were analyzed with a validated real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay., Results: EGFR exon 19/21 mutations were detected in 55 of 91 baseline blood samples (60.4%) and correlated with a significantly worse progression-free survival: 11.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.0-14.8 mo) for the patients who were positive versus 22.9 months (95% CI: 9.5-33.9 mo) for those who were negative (log-rank p = 0.0020). Among the 74 samples at response, exon 19/21 mutations were detected only in three samples (4.1%). In contrast, 29 of 58 patients (50.0%) were exon 19/21 positive at progression and showed a significantly worse median overall survival of 21.7 months (95% CI: 17.0-30.9 mo) compared with 37.4 months (95% CI: 22.6-53.1 mo) for those who were negative (log-rank p = 0.011). Blood samples at the three time points were available for 48 patients. Of those, among 14 exon 19/21 EGFR-negative at presentation, 13 (93%) were persistently negative for the sensitizing mutations after progression and the p.T790M could only be detected in the blood of two patients., Conclusions: Longitudinal testing of EGFR mutations in blood can offer valuable clinical information. In patients of the BELIEF study, detection of EGFR mutations in circulating free DNA at presentation was associated with shorter progression-free survival, whereas positivity at progression correlated with shorter overall survival. Finally, patients negative in blood at presentation were almost invariably negative at relapse., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a group of distinct diseases, with clinical and molecular differences between right-sided and left-sided tumours driving varying prognosis., Methods: Patients with KRAS / RAS -wild type (wt) mCRC treated in first line with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFR-Is) (cetuximab or panitumumab) plus oxaliplatin or irinotecan-based chemotherapy from two phase II randomised trials conducted by the Spanish Cooperative for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours group were included in this retrospective study. The main objective was to analyse the prognostic effect of primary tumour location on objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: Patients with KRAS -wt right-sided tumours (n=52) had significantly lower efficacy as compared with patients with KRAS -wt left-sided tumours (n=209); confirmed ORR (25% vs 47%, respectively; OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.8, p=0.004); and shorter median PFS (7.2 vs 9.9 months; HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.9, p=0.0157) and OS (13.6 vs 27.7 months; HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.7, p<0.0001). Similar results were observed in the RAS -wt populations. The further classification of left-sided tumours as colon or rectum delivered similar survival outcomes, as well as a tendency to diminished ORR in patients with rectum tumours., Conclusion: We observed significantly improved efficacy outcomes in patients with KRAS / RAS -wt mCRC treated with first-line EGFR-I plus chemotherapy in left-sided primary tumours as compared with right-sided primary tumours., Trial Registration Numbers: NCT01161316 and NCT00885885., (© Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Background: Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer incidence and mortality worldwide. Although Spain contributes to global statistics related to cancer, it is difficult to discern aspects linked to clinical presentation of the disease or molecular testing. The Thoracic Tumor Registry (TTR) was created with the aim of filling this gap., Methods: Observational cohort multicenter study performed in Spain, including patients with lung cancer or other types of thoracic tumors undergoing active treatment or palliative care only. Enrollment took place between August 2016 and December 2018. The evaluation included a review of demographic, epidemiological, clinical and molecular data., Results: A total of 6,600 patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were recruited at 56 Spanish hospitals. The mean age at diagnosis was 64 years. The majority of patients (80%) presented with advanced disease, being adenocarcinoma the most frequent histological type. Up to 86% of patients were current- or ex-smokers, with men starting to smoke earlier than women (average age 17.9 vs. 19.2 years). Sixty-seven percent of patients underwent some type of molecular testing. Mutations in EGFR and KRAS genes were found in 18% and 28% of patients, respectively., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the TTR study accurately describes the clinical reality of lung cancer in Spain, including useful information on smoking status as well as molecular profiling and tumor histology, and can therefore be used to drive improvements in health care. Social and political pressure to reduce tobacco consumption among the population should be reinforced, particularly among youth., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: Dr. M Provencio has received personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Roche, Novartis, and Takeda and research grants from Roche and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. R López-Castro has received personal fees from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb and Merck Serono and non-financial support from Roche and Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr. J Bosch-Barrera has received personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boheringer Ingelheim, MSD, and Roche and research grants from Pfizer, Boheringer-Ingelheim, and Roche. Dr. M Domine has received personal fees from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, MSD, Pfizer, and Roche. The other authors no conflicts of interest to declare.

Introduction: ROS1 rearrangements are found in 1% of lung cancer patients. Therapeutic efficacy of crizotinib in this subset has been shown in early phase trials in the United States and East Asia. Here we present data on efficacy and safety of a prospective phase II trial evaluating crizotinib in European ROS1-positive patients (EUCROSS)., Patients and Methods: The trial was a multicenter, single-arm phase II trial (Clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT02183870). Key eligibility criteria included patients who were 18 years of age or older with advanced/metastatic lung cancer and centrally confirmed ROS1-rearranged lung cancer (fluorescence-in situ hybridization). Treatment included 250 mg crizotinib twice daily. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1). Key secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, efficacy by independent radiologic review, safety, health-related quality of life, and molecular characterization of tumor tissue., Results: Thirty-four patients received treatment. Four patients were excluded from efficacy analysis. Investigator ORR was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 51-85; 21 of 30 patients) and median PFS was 20.0 months (95% CI: 10.1-not reached). Two patients with ROS1 wild-type sequences assessed by DNA sequencing had progression as best response. CD74-ROS1-positive patients had a trend towards a higher ORR and longer median PFS. TP53-co-mutant patients had a significantly shorter median PFS than wild-type patients (7.0 months, 95% CI: 1.7-20.0 versus 24.1 months, 95% CI: 10.1-not reached; p = 0.022). Treatment-related adverse events were documented in 33 of 34 patients (97%)., Conclusions: Crizotinib is highly effective and safe in patients with ROS1-rearranged lung cancer. ROS1-/TP53-co-aberrant patients had a significantly worse outcome compared to TP53 wild-type patients., (Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib improves the outcomes of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) harbouring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. The coexistence of the T790M resistance mutation with another EGFR mutation in treatment-naive patients has been associated with a shorter progression-free survival to EGFR inhibition than in the absence of the T790M mutation. To test this hypothesis clinically, we developed a proof-of-concept study, in which patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC were treated with the combination of erlotinib and bevacizumab, stratified by the presence of the pretreatment T790M mutation., Methods: BELIEF was an international, multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial done at 29 centres in eight European countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had treatment-naive, pathologically confirmed stage IIIB or stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with a confirmed, activating EGFR mutation (exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation). Patients received oral erlotinib 150 mg per day and intravenous bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 21 days and were tested centrally for the pretreatment T790M resistance mutation with a peptide nucleic acid probe-based real-time PCR. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. The primary efficacy analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population and was stratified into two parallel substudies according to the centrally confirmed pretreatment T790M mutation status of enrolled patients (T790M positive or negative). The safety analysis was done in all patients that have received at least one dose of trial treatment. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01562028., Findings: Between June 11, 2012, and Oct 28, 2014, 109 patients were enrolled and included in the efficacy analysis. 37 patients were T790M mutation positive and 72 negative. The overall median progression-free survival was 13·2 months (95% CI 10·3-15·5), with a 12 month progression-free survival of 55% (95% CI 45-64). The primary endpoint was met only in substudy one (T790M-positive patients). In the T790M-positive group, median progression-free survival was 16·0 months (12·7 to not estimable), with a 12 month progression-free survival of 68% (50-81), whereas in the T790M-negative group, median progression-free survival was 10·5 months (9·4-14·2), with a 12 month progression-free survival of 48% (36-59). Of 106 patients included in the safety analysis, five had grade 4 adverse events (one acute coronary syndrome, one biliary tract infection, one other neoplasms, and two colonic perforations) and one died due to sepsis., Interpretation: The BELIEF trial provides further evidence of benefit for the combined use of erlotinib and bevacizumab in patients with NSCLC harbouring activating EGFR mutations., Funding: European Thoracic Oncology Platform, Roche., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Docetaxel and erlotinib are registered second-line treatments for wild-type EGFR NSCLC. Previous studies suggested a predictive value of the VeriStrat test in second-line therapy of NSCLC, classifying patients as either VeriStrat good or VeriStrat poor. EMPHASIS-lung aimed at exploring this predictive effect in patients with squamous cell NSCLC. The trial closed prematurely because of low accrual and results from other trials. Our analysis includes an exploratory combined analysis with results from the PROSE trial., Methods: EMPHASIS-lung was a randomized phase III multicenter trial exploring the differential effect of second-line erlotinib versus docetaxel on progression-free survival (PFS) in VeriStrat good versus VeriStrat poor patients with squamous cell NSCLC., Results: A total of 80 patients were randomized, with 72.5% categorized as VeriStrat good. Patient characteristics were balanced between VeriStrat status and treatment groups. The median PFS times with docetaxel and erlotinib treatment in the VeriStrat good cohort were 4.1 and 1.6 months, respectively, versus 1.9 and 2.1 months, respectively, in the VeriStrat poor cohort. The median overall survival (OS) times with docetaxel and erlotinib treatment in the VeriStrat good cohort were 7.8 and 8.4 months, respectively, and 4.4 and 5.2 months, respectively, in the VeriStrat poor cohort. An additional exploratory analysis was performed; in it, 47 patients from the squamous cell subgroup of PROSE were included in a combined analysis, contributing with 45 PFS and 41 OS events., Conclusions: The final analysis of EMPHASIS-lung did not show a differential effect on PFS for erlotinib versus docetaxel stratified by VeriStrat status. Similarly, in the combined analysis, no significant treatment by VeriStrat status interaction was observed (interaction p = 0.24 for PFS and 0.45 for OS, stratified by study)., (Copyright © 2017 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) status were identified as prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy and bevacizumab in analyses of the MACRO (Maintenance Treatment in Advanced Colorectal Cancer) trial. In this post hoc analysis of the MACRO trial, the potential additive effect of these 2 factors on patient outcomes was explored., Methods: A total of 158 of the 480 patients involved in the MACRO trial were included in the biological marker substudy. CTC isolation and enumeration were centralized and performed using the CellSearch System (Veridex LLC, Raritan, NJ) in 7.5 mL of whole blood. Evaluation of KRAS status was performed retrospectively by the standard method used at each center. PFS and OS were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method according to CTC count and KRAS status., Results: Patients with < 3 CTC per 7.5 mL blood at baseline and KRAS wild-type tumors had a median PFS of 14.2 months compared with 6.2 months in patients with ≥ 3 CTCs and KRAS mutated tumors (P < .0001; hazard ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-5.2). Similar findings were observed for OS (28.9 and 13.7 months, respectively, P = .0004; hazard ratio 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-4.9). Multivariate analyses showed that CTC count ≥ 3 and KRAS status were the only independent prognostic factors for both PFS and OS., Conclusions: This post hoc analysis showed that CTC count and KRAS status were independent prognostic factors for outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with bevacizumab ± chemotherapy. These factors should be taken into account in the design of future phase III trials., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Somatostatin analogues (SSAs) are indicated to relieve carcinoid syndrome but seem to have antiproliferative effects on neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). This is the first prospective study investigating tumour stabilisation with the long-acting SSA lanreotide Autogel in patients with progressive NETs., Methods: This was a multicentre, open-label, phase II trial conducted in 17 Spanish specialist centres. Patients with well-differentiated NETs and radiologically confirmed progression within the previous 6 months received lanreotide Autogel, 120 mg every 28 days over ≤92 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were response rate, tumour biomarkers, symptom control, quality of life (QoL), and safety. Radiographic imaging was assessed by a blinded central radiologist., Results: Of 30 patients included in the efficacy and safety analyses, 40% had midgut tumours and 27% pancreatic tumours; 63% of tumours were functioning. Median PFS time was 12.9 (95% CI: 7.9, 16.5) months, and most patients achieved disease stabilisation (89%) or partial response (4%). No deterioration in QoL was observed. Nineteen patients (63%) experienced treatment-related adverse events, most frequently diarrhoea and asthenia; only one treatment-related adverse event (aerophagia) was severe., Conclusion: Lanreotide Autogel provided effective tumour stabilisation and PFS >12 months in patients with progressive NETs ineligible for surgery or chemotherapy, with a safety profile consistent with the pharmacology of the class., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00326469; EU Clinical Trial Register EudraCT no 2004-002871-18.

The optimal schedule and regimen of chemotherapy (CT) in association with chemoradiation has not been established in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We have compared three schedules of non-platinum-based CT plus either radiotherapy or chemoradiation. From May 2001 to June 2006, 158 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC were enrolled in a randomized phase II trial with overall response rate (ORR) as the primary endpoint. The initial design included three arms: sequential CT followed by thoracic radiation (TRT); concurrent CT/TRT followed by consolidation CT; and induction CT followed by concurrent CT/TRT. However, based on the preliminary results of the RTOG 9410 trial, the sequential arm was closed when 19 patients had been enrolled. All patients received two cycles of docetaxel 40 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 plus gemcitabine 1200 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8, as either induction or consolidation therapy. Concurrent CT/TRT consisted of docetaxel 20 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 2 weekly plus 60 Gy TRT. No differences were found in ORR between the two arms (56% and 57%). Hematological toxicity was mild but significantly superior with consolidation CT; the esophagitis rate was similar in both arms (16% and 15%). With a median follow-up of 57 months, no differences were found in median survival (13.07 and 13.8 months) or 5-year survival (16.4% and 22%). This regimen cannot be recommended as an alternative to platinum-based CT/TRT although it has an acceptable toxicity profile and encouraging long-term survival data (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01652820)., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: A prospective phase II study was conducted to assess the clinical activity and tolerability of oxaliplatin, capecitabine, and radiotherapy (RT) for neoadjuvant therapy of stages II-III rectal cancer., Materials and Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed stages II-III (T3-T4 and/or N+) resectable rectal adenocarcinoma were eligible. Capecitabine was administered at 825 mg/m(2) twice daily for 5 days/week and oxaliplatin at 50 mg/m(2) on day 1 weekly for 5 weeks starting the first day of RT (before RT). RT consisted of a total dose of 45 Gy delivered in 25 fractions of 1.8 Gy, 5 days per week, for 5 weeks., Results: A total of 46 patients were included (35 male, 10 female, median age 62 years). TNM Stage was T3 in 43 patients and T4 in 2. Twenty-eight patients had suspected nodal involvement. The intended chemoradiation treatment was completed in 94 % patients. Grade 3/4 toxicity included lymphocytopenia (6 patients), diarrhea (4 patients), emesis (2 patients), asthenia (3 patients), anorexia (1 patient), and hepatic toxicity (1 patient). Grade 1 neurotoxicity occurred in 18 patients, Grade 2 neurotoxicity in 3, and Grade 1 palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia in 2. Forty-two patients underwent surgery (complete resection 95 %, sphincter-saving operation 55 %). The overall pathologic response rate was 83 %, with a pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of 11.9 % (95 % CI 4.0-25.6)., Conclusions: The pCR rate observed with oxaliplatin plus capecitabine and RT did not reach the pre-specified criteria of efficacy in this trial, which is in line with recent results of randomized phase III trials.

Purpose: The aim of this phase III trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab alone with those of bevacizumab and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) as maintenance treatment following induction chemotherapy with XELOX plus bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)., Patients and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of bevacizumab, capecitabine, and oxaliplatin every 3 weeks followed by XELOX plus bevacizumab or bevacizumab alone until progression. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) interval; secondary endpoints were the overall survival (OS) time, objective response rate (RR), time to response, duration of response, and safety., Results: The intent-to-treat population comprised 480 patients (XELOX plus bevacizumab, n = 239; bevacizumab, n = 241); there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. The median follow-up was 29.0 months (range, 0-53.2 months). There were no statistically significant differences in the median PFS or OS times or in the RR between the two arms. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities in the XELOX plus bevacizumab versus bevacizumab arms were diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome, and neuropathy., Conclusion: Although the noninferiority of bevacizumab versus XELOX plus bevacizumab cannot be confirmed, we can reliably exclude a median PFS detriment >3 weeks. This study suggests that maintenance therapy with single-agent bevacizumab may be an appropriate option following induction XELOX plus bevacizumab in mCRC patients.

Background: In the MACRO study, patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were randomised to first-line treatment with 6 cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) plus bevacizumab followed by either single-agent bevacizumab or XELOX plus bevacizumab until disease progression. An additional retrospective analysis was performed to define the prognostic value of tumour KRAS status on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and response rates., Methodology/principal Findings: KRAS data (tumour KRAS status and type of mutation) were collected by questionnaire from participating centres that performed KRAS analyses. These data were then cross-referenced with efficacy data for relevant patients in the MACRO study database. KRAS status was analysed in 394 of the 480 patients (82.1%) in the MACRO study. Wild-type (WT) KRAS tumours were found in 219 patients (56%) and mutant (MT) KRAS in 175 patients (44%). Median PFS was 10.9 months for patients with WT KRAS and 9.4 months for patients with MT KRAS tumours (p=0.0038; HR: 1.40; 95% CI:1.12-1.77). The difference in OS was also significant: 26.7 months versus 18.0 months for WT versus MT KRAS, respectively (p=0.0002; HR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.23-1.96). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that KRAS was an independent variable for both PFS and OS. Responses were observed in 126 patients (57.5%) with WT KRAS tumours and 76 patients (43.4%) with MT KRAS tumours (p=0.0054; OR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.18-2.64)., Conclusions/significance: This analysis of the MACRO study suggests a prognostic role for tumour KRAS status in patients with mCRC treated with XELOX plus bevacizumab. For both PFS and OS, KRAS status was an independent factor in univariate and multivariate analyses.

Median survival of patients with brain metastases from nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is poor and more effective treatments are urgently needed. We have evaluated the efficacy of erlotinib in this setting and its association with activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene. We retrospectively identified patients with NSCLC and brain metastases treated with erlotinib. EGFR mutations in exons 19 and 21 were analysed by direct sequencing. Efficacy and tolerability were compared according to EGFR mutational status. 69 NSCLC patients with brain metastases were identified, 17 of whom harboured EGFR mutations. Objective response rate in patients with EGFR mutations was 82.4%; no responses were observed in unselected patients (p<0.001). Median (95% CI) time to progression within the brain for patients harbouring EGFR mutations was 11.7 (7.9-15.5) months, compared to 5.8 (5.2-6.4) months for control patients whose EGFR mutational status had not been assessed (p<0.05). Overall survival was 12.9 (6.2-19.7) months and 3.1 (2.5-3.9) months (p<0.001), respectively. The toxicity of erlotinib was as expected and no differences between cohorts were observed. Erlotinib is active in brain metastases from NSCLC; this clinical benefit is related to the presence of activating mutations in exons 19 or 21 of the EGFR gene.

Purpose: The prognosis of patients with unresectable M0 gastric cancer remains very poor. We performed a phase II trial to explore the efficacy and toxicity of induction irinotecan-cisplatin (IC) followed by concurrent irinotecan-cisplatin and radiotherapy (IC/RT) in this setting., Methods and Materials: Patients with unresectable M0 gastric (GC) or oesophageal-gastric junction (EGJC) adenocarcinomas were treated with two courses of IC (irinotecan, 65 mg/m(2); cisplatin, 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days) followed by IC/RT (daily radiotherapy-45 Gy-with concurrent IC: irinotecan, 65 mg/m(2), and cisplatin, 30 mg/m(2), on days 1, 8, 15, and 22). Resectability was reassessed after this treatment, and surgical resection was performed if feasible. The primary endpoint was the R0 resection rate after induction treatment., Results: Seventeen patients were included in the study (EGJC: 6; GC: 11). An R0 resection was achieved in only 5 patients (29%), and according to the design of the trial (Simon's optimal two-stage) accrual of patients was terminated after the first stage. No patient died during IC, whereas 3 patients (24%) died during IC/RT and one of 5 resected patients (20%) died during the first 30 days after resection. The median survival was 10.5 months, and the actuarial 2-year survival rate was 27%., Conclusions: Induction IC followed by IC/RT showed poor efficacy and significant toxicity in patients with unresectable GC/EGJC.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze prognostic variables associated with long-term survival in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer enrolled in a Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) phase II trial., Patients and Methods: Between May 2001 and June 2006, 139 patients were enrolled. The initial design included 3 arms: sequential chemotherapy (CT) followed by standard thoracic radiation therapy (TRT; RT), concomitant CT/TRT followed by consolidation CT, or induction CT followed by CT/TRT. Based on the results of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9410 trial, the sequential arm was closed. Induction or consolidation therapy comprised docetaxel plus gemcitabine. Concomitant treatment comprised docetaxel plus carboplatin plus 60 Gy TRT. A univariate and a Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of the following 11 variables were performed: age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS), histology, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, disease stage, nodal status, hemoglobin level, completion of RT treatment, completion of induction or consolidation plus concomitant treatment, and RT delay., Results: With a median follow-up of 23 months for living patients, median survival was 13.07 months for the consolidation arm and 14.65 months for the induction arm. The 4-year survival rates were 25.37% and 32.35%, respectively. Only RT treatment completion (P < .0001) and induction or consolidation plus concomitant treatment completion (P < .0001) were associated with longer survival., Conclusion: Based on this retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in the SLCG 0008 randomized phase II study, age, sex, PS, and clinical parameters are not good predictors of overall survival; however, completion of treatment is needed to achieve long-term results.

Purpose: Healthy elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer may benefit from chemotherapy as much as the younger population. This analysis compares the outcomes of first-line oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidines in elderly versus young patients., Patients and Methods: 348 patients were randomized to capecitabine 1000 mg/(m2 12 h), days 1-14 plus oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 day 1, every 3 weeks or weekly infusional 5-FU 2250 mg/m2 over 48 h plus bimonthly oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2. We evaluated response rate, time to progression, overall survival and toxicity according to age., Results: ORR for elderly and young patients were 34.9% and 44.7%, respectively (p=0.081). Median TTP did not differ between the two groups: 8.3 months for patients > or =70 years and 9.6 months for those <70 years (p=0.114). Median OS was 16.8 months and 20.5 months for the > or =70 and <70 years groups, respectively (p=0.74). With XELOX, mild paresthesia and an increase in transaminase levels were more frequent for young patients, whereas grade 3/4 diarrhea was higher in those > or =70 years (25% vs. 8%, p=0.005). For FUOX, only paresthesia was significantly lower in patients > or =70 years (53% vs. 71%, p=0.032)., Conclusion: Elderly patients with MCRC benefit from first-line oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine combinations as much as younger patients, without increased toxicity.

Mutation V600E of BRAF, a kinase-encoding gene from the RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway, in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) suggests a sporadic origin of the disease, providing an exclusion criterion for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Here we describe detection of this mutation by real-time chemistry TaqMan MGB probes, confirmed by direct DNA sequencing as the gold standard. DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue from 112 tumors obtained from the EPICOLON study. Seventy-two tumors were CRC with defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR; microsatellite instability and/or loss of protein expression by immunohistochemical analysis), and 40 were proficient MMR controls. BRAF mutation was detected in 20/72 (27.8%) CRC with defective MMR and in 3/40 (7.5%) proficient MMR controls (P = 0.011). BRAF mutation was detected in 19/51 (37.3%) tumors with loss of MLH1 expression and in none of the tumors with loss of MSH2 expression (0/13). BRAF mutation was not found in cases with germline mutation of MLH1 (4/112) or MSH2 (3/112) genes. The sensitivity and specificity of our real-time chemistry were both 100% for detecting the V600E mutation. Because real-time chemistry methodology has advantages in cost, time, and labor, we consider it a valuable alternative to automatic direct sequencing, particularly for serial measurements.

The combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin (LV) with oxaliplatin has become one of the standard treatments for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Two consecutive phase II trials assessed the efficacy and safety of combined therapy with oxaliplatin and high-dose 5-FU without LV for patients with advanced CRC. A total of 89 patients were enrolled in both trials. Fifty-nine patients in trial A underwent a scheduled regimen of biweekly oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) and weekly nonmodulated 5-FU 3.0 g/m(2). Increased incidence of toxicity led to a 25% reduction in the starting dose of 5-FU (2.25 g/m(2)) for trial B. Patients treated in trial B showed a higher cumulative dose and relative dose intensity for oxaliplatin and 5-FU than those treated in trial A. Response to treatment, time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and duration of response were evaluated as efficacy variables. Overall response rate was preserved despite the reduction in 5-FU dose (55.9% and 63.0%, respectively). Median durations of responses were 10.6 and 10.4 months, median TTPs were 7.7 and 7.3 months, and OS times were 21.7 and 13.1 months, respectively. Reduction in the starting 5-FU dose from 3.0 to 2.25 g/m(2) resulted in a decrease in the main grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities (neutropenia, 22.0% to 10.0%) and nonhematologic toxicities (diarrhea, 52.5% to 23.3%; nausea/vomiting, 18.6% to 3.3%). Neurosensory toxicity was similar in both trials (16.9% and 16.7%). Biweekly oxaliplatin in combination with nonmodulated high-dose 5-FU is an active, well-tolerated treatment that offers a lower cost than a modulated schedule for patients with advanced, metastatic CRC.

Oxaliplatin (L-OHP), irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) have shown their efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer. The synergism of these drugs has been demonstrated in vivo and in vitro. The aim of this study was to determine the recommended dose of the triple combination of L-OHP, CPT-11 and CI 5-FU for a further phase II study. Eighteen patients received the study treatment in four dose levels. The male:female ratio was 15:3 and the median age was 51.6 years (range 30-71). The type of tumor was colon in eight patients, rectum in four and other locations in six patients. The treatment was repeated every 2 weeks, at the fixed dose of L-OHP, 85 mg/m, and escalated doses of CPT-11 and 48-h infusion 5-FU of 100/2000, 100/2250, 125/2250 and 150/2250 mg/m. Only one previous treatment for the advanced disease was permitted. Patients received a median of 8 cycles (range 1-26) and a total of 152 cycles were administered. Dose intensity administered at dose level L-OHP 85 mg/m, CPT-11 150 mg/m and 5-FU 2250 mg/m was 95, 92 and 95% for L-OHP, CPT-11 and 5-FU, respectively. One patient in level 2 and one patient in level 4 presented dose-limiting toxicity that was not confirmed in the three required additional patients by level. The anti-tumor activity was assessed in nine patients: seven partial responses, one stable disease and one progressive disease. The maximum-tolerated dose was not reached, and thus the recommended dose for this combination schedule is L-OHP, 85 mg/m, CPT-11, 150 mg/m and 5-FU, 2250 mg/m 48-h continuous infusion, the same doses that were recommended for the drugs when administered in combination therapy of L-OHP + 5-FU or CPT-11 + 5-FU. A phase II study in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with this dose regimen is ongoing.

Purpose: Given the cisplatin-related myelotoxicity and nonhematologic toxicities, we were prompted to undertake a study of the noncisplatin combination of paclitaxel plus gemcitabine to evaluate the efficacy, tolerance, and survival of this combination in patients with locally advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Patients and Methods: Patients received gemcitabine 2,000 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 150 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, for a maximum of eight cycles., Results: Between December 1997 and June 1998, 89 untreated NSCLC patients were enrolled; 30 (34%) had stage IIIB disease (23 with malignant pleural effusion and seven without), and 59 (66%) had stage IV disease. Eighty-six percent of patients had a performance status of 0 or 1. The median number of cycles administered was four (range, one to eight cycles). The mean dose-intensity for both paclitaxel and gemcitabine was nearly 100%. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were mild. Thirty-eight patients received second-line chemotherapy after completion of the study. The overall intent-to-treat response rate was 32.2%, with a higher response rate for stage IIIB patients (43.3%) than for stage IV patients (26.3%). Overall median survival was 9.9 months, and 1-year survival was 38.8% (14.2 months for stage IIIB and 7.7 months for stage IV; P =.007). Median survival was 10.2 months for patients with a performance status of 0 or 1 and 4.8 months for patients with a performance status of 2 (P =.007)., Conclusion: A biweekly paclitaxel/gemcitabine regimen was well tolerated, with an acceptable response rate and a reasonable median survival time, especially in patients with good performance status. It merits further exploration in future studies.

To test the hypothesis of an association between HER2 and chemotherapy resistance, we performed a prospective assessment of the predictive value of the circulating HER2 extracellular domain (ECD) in patients with advanced breast carcinoma in the setting of a multicenter Phase II trial using paclitaxel and doxorubicin. Serum samples were collected from 58 patients with metastatic breast carcinoma before first-line chemotherapy for advanced disease, and the levels of circulating HER2 ECD were measured using an enzyme immunoassay. Immunohistochemistry with anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody CB11 was used to assess the overexpression of HER2 in the primary tumors. When 450 fmol/ml was used as a cutoff, 24 cases (41%) had elevated HER2 ECD levels. Elevated levels of circulating HER2 ECD were associated with the expression of HER2 in the primary tumor tissue and with the metastatic tumor burden (evaluated with the marker CA 15-3; P = 0.032 and P = 0.002, respectively) but not with variables such as menopausal status, stage at diagnosis, previous adjuvant therapy, or the number of metastatic sites. The levels of circulating HER2 ECD correlated inversely with the response to treatment. The probability of obtaining a complete response to chemotherapy was significantly lower (P = 0.021) in patients with elevated HER2 ECD levels (0%; 95% confidence interval, 0-13%) compared with patients with nonelevated HER2 (26%; 95% confidence interval, 12-45%). In addition, the duration of clinical response was significantly shorter in patients with elevated HER2 ECD, compared with the cases with nonelevated HER2 (7.5 versus 11 months; P = 0.035). In conclusion, elevated levels of circulating HER2 ECD in patients with metastatic breast cancer correlate with reduced efficacy of a paclitaxel-doxorubicin chemotherapy combination. We suggest that the poor response rate associated with HER2 expression in advanced breast cancer may not be reversed by aggressive chemotherapy alone.

After a 26% response rate was reported with a 20/mg/m2/week vinorelbine (VRL) dose, a multicenter phase II trial of a modified weekly VRL treatment protocol (30 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 every 21 days) for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was designed to determine its clinical activity, toxicity, and survival of treated patients. As myelotoxicity frequently precludes the administration of VRL, by suppressing the dose that would correspond to day 15 of a weekly protocol, we allowed bone marrow recovery to take place and avoided the administration of the drug at the nadir of the cycle. The trial included 71 consecutive, previously untreated patients with unresectable and measurable disease. A total of 297 three-week treatment courses were administered with an average of 4 courses per patient (range 1-11). Results showed that in spite of attaining a median dose intensity of 19 mg/m2/week, this modified weekly VRL treatment regimen has a low level of activity (7.5% response rate) in NSCLC. Although a more tolerable level of toxicity is achieved, in order to maintain its antitumor activity, the recommended dose of VRL when given alone for NSCLC treatment (30 mg/m2/weekly) should not be decreased.

Aims and Background: To evaluate a new anthracycline 4'-iodo-4'-deoxydoxorubicin (I-DOX) in patients with measurable advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma in a phase II study., Methods: We investigated therapeutic activity and toxicities associated with repeated courses of I-DOX 80 mg/m2 administered every 3 weeks. Eighteen patients entered the trial, all of them evaluable for response and toxicity., Results: A total of 47 courses were administered. The median cumulative I-DOX dose was 238 mg/m2 (80-320). Myelosuppression, particularly leukopenia, was the most frequent and serious side effect associated with I-DOX treatment; World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3-4 leukopenia occurred in 4 patients (22%). No thrombocytopenia was observed except in 1 patient who presented WHO grade 4. Only 1 patient developed febrile neutropenia but recovered uneventfully. Overall, the I-DOX treatment was well tolerated. Grade 3-4 nausea/vomiting was observed in 2% of the cycles and no other severe toxicities were recorded. Echocardiography or multiple gated scan was performed before treatment and during follow-up in 14 patients to measure left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and a decrease > 15% was detected in 3, including 1 whose LVEF fell below normal values (48%) (normal range > 49%). There were no cases of congestive heart failure or treatment-related deaths. No complete or partial response (PR) was observed. Twelve patients received weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil (WFU) as rescue. Four patients had PR, 5 no change and 3 progressive disease (PD). The median time to PD of the whole group from study entry to failure after WFU was 30 weeks and the overall median survival was 11 months., Conclusions: As reported for other anthracyclines, I-DOX showed no activity in colorectal adenocarcinoma; however, the use of an investigational agent as front-line chemotherapy for colorectal adenocarcinoma does not compromise further response to 5-FU.

A case of relapsing bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia complicated by malignant lymphoma (four years after the diagnosis) is reported in a 58-year-old woman. To our knowledge, such an association has not been described previously in detail in the literature.