Search

Initiation, a major rate-limiting step of host protein translation, is a critical target in many viral infections. Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection results in hepatocellular carcinoma. Translation initiation, up-regulated in many cancers, plays a critical role in tumorigenesis. mTOR is a major regulator of host protein translation. Even though activation of PI3K-AKT-mTOR by HCV non-structural protein 5A (NS5A) is known, not much is understood about the regulation of host translation initiation by this virus. Here for the first time we show that HCV up-regulates host cap-dependent translation machinery in Huh7.5 cells through simultaneous activation of mTORC1 and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) by NS5A. NS5A, interestingly, overexpressed and subsequently hyperphosphorylated 4EBP1. NS5A phosphorylated eIF4E through the p38 MAPK-MNK pathway. Both HCV infection and NS5A expression augmented eIF4F complex assembly, an indicator of cap-dependent translation efficiency. Global translation, however, was not altered by HCV NS5A. 4EBP1 phosphorylation, but not that of S6K1, was uniquely resistant to rapamycin in NS5A-Huh7.5 cells, indicative of an alternate phosphorylation mechanism of 4EBP1. Resistance of Ser-473, but not Thr-308, phosphorylation of AKT to PI3K inhibitors suggested an activation of mTORC2 by NS5A. NS5A associated with eIF4F complex and polysomes, suggesting its active involvement in host translation. This is the first report that implicates an HCV protein in the up-regulation of host translation initiation apparatus through concomitant regulation of multiple pathways. Because both mTORC1 activation and eIF4E phosphorylation are involved in tumorigenesis, we propose that their simultaneous activation by NS5A might contribute significantly to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Protein synthesis is a complex, tightly regulated process in eukaryotic cells and its deregulation is a hallmark of many cancers. Translational control occurs primarily at the rate-limiting initiation step, where ribosomal subunits are recruited to template mRNAs through the concerted action of several eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs). One factor that interacts with both the mRNA and ribosomes, and appears limiting for translation is eIF4F, a complex composed of the cap-binding protein, eIF4E; the scaffold protein, eIF4G; and the ATP-dependent DEAD-box helicase, eIF4A. eIF4E appears to play an important role in tumor initiation and progression since its overexpression can cooperate with oncogenes to accelerate transformation in cell lines and animal models, and its levels are elevated in many human cancers. This, therefore, represents a vulnerability for transformed cells, and presents an opportunity for therapeutic intervention. In this review, we discuss approaches for targeting eIF4F activity.

The composition of the cellular proteome is under the control of multiple processes, one of the most important being translation initiation. The majority of eukaryotic cellular mRNAs initiates translation by the cap-dependent or scanning mode of translation initiation, a mechanism that depends on the recognition of the m 7G(5(′))ppp(5(′))N, known as the cap. However, mRNAs encoding proteins required for cell survival under stress bypass conditions inhibitory to cap-dependent translation; these mRNAs often harbor internal ribosome entry site (IRES) elements in their 5(′)UTRs that mediate internal initiation of translation. This mechanism is also exploited by mRNAs expressed from the genome of viruses infecting eukaryotic cells. In this paper we discuss recent advances in understanding alternative ways to initiate translation across eukaryotic organisms., Grants BFU2008-02159, CSD2009-00080; Fundación Ramón Areces

Initiation of eukaryotic mRNA translation may proceed via several different routes, each requiring a different subset of factors and relying on different and specific interactions between the mRNA and the ribosome. Two modes predominate: (i) so-called cap-dependent initiation, which requires all canonical initiation factors and is responsible for about 95-97% of all initiation events in eukaryotic cells; and (ii) cap-independent internal initiation, which requires a reduced subset of initiation factors and accounts for up to 5% of the remaining initiation events. Internal initiation relies on the presence of so-called Internal Ribosome Entry Site (IRES) elements in the 5’ UTRs of some viral and cellular mRNAs. These elements (often possessing complex secondary and tertiary structures) promote efficient interaction of the mRNA with the 40S ribosome and allow for internal ribosome entry. Internal initiation of translation of specific mRNAs may contribute to development of severe disease and pathological states, such as hepatitis C and cancer. Therefore, this cellular mechanism represents an attractive target for pharmacological modulation. The purpose of this review is to provide insight into current strategies used to target viral and cellular IRESs and discuss the physiological consequences (and potential therapeutic implications) of abrogation/modulation of IRES-mediated translation.

Yeast eIF1 inhibits initiation at non-AUG triplets, but it was unknown whether it also discriminates against AUGs in suboptimal context. As in other eukaryotes, the yeast gene encoding eIF1 (SUI1) contains an AUG in poor context, which could underlie translational autoregulation. Previously, eIF1 mutations were identified that increase initiation at UUG codons (Sui(-) phenotype), and we obtained mutations with the opposite phenotype of suppressing UUG initiation (Ssu(-) phenotype). Remarkably, Sui(-) mutations in eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1 (eIF1), eIF1A, and eIF2β all increase SUI1 expression in a manner diminished by introducing the optimal context at the SUI1 AUG, whereas Ssu(-) mutations in eIF1 and eIF1A decrease SUI1 expression with the native, but not optimal, context present. Therefore, discrimination against weak context depends on specific residues in eIFs 1, 1A, and 2β that also impede selection of non-AUGs, suggesting that context nucleotides and AUG act coordinately to stabilize the preinitiation complex. Although eIF1 autoregulates by discriminating against poor context in yeast and mammals, this mechanism does not prevent eIF1 overproduction in yeast, accounting for the hyperaccuracy phenotype afforded by SUI1 overexpression.

Protein fate in higher eukaryotes is controlled by three complexes that share conserved architectural elements: the proteasome, COP9 signalosome, and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3). Here we reconstitute the 13-subunit human eIF3 in Escherichia coli , revealing its structural core to be the eight subunits with conserved orthologues in the proteasome lid complex and COP9 signalosome. This structural core in eIF3 binds to the small (40S) ribosomal subunit, to translation initiation factors involved in mRNA cap-dependent initiation, and to the hepatitis C viral (HCV) internal ribosome entry site (IRES) RNA. Addition of the remaining eIF3 subunits enables reconstituted eIF3 to assemble intact initiation complexes with the HCV IRES. Negative-stain EM reconstructions of reconstituted eIF3 further reveal how the approximately 400 kDa molecular mass structural core organizes the highly flexible 800 kDa molecular mass eIF3 complex, and mediates translation initiation.

Eukaryotic translation requires a suite of proteins known as eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs). These molecular effectors oversee the highly regulated initiation phase of translation. Essential to eukaryotic translation initiation is the protein eIF2, a heterotrimeric protein composed of the individually distinct subunits eIF2α, eIF2β, and eIF2γ. The ternary complex, formed when eIF2 binds to GTP and Met-tRNA(i), is responsible for shuttling Met-tRNA(i) onto the awaiting 40S ribosome. As a necessary component for translation initiation, much attention has been given to the phosphorylation of eIF2α. Despite several previous investigations into eIF2 phosphorylation, most have centered on α- or β-subunit phosphorylation and little is known regarding γ-subunit phosphorylation. Herein, we report eight sites of phosphorylation on the largest eIF2 subunit with seven novel phosphosite identifications via high resolution mass spectrometry. Of the eight sites identified, three are located in either the switch regions or nucleotide binding pocket domain. In addition, we have identified a possible kinase of eIF2, protein kinase C (PKC), which is capable of phosphorylating threonine 66 (thr-66) on the intact heterotrimer. These findings may shed new light on the regulation of ternary complex formation and alternate molecular effectors involved in this process prior to 80S ribosome formation and subsequent translation elongation and termination.

Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is thought to have been involved in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic evolution. However, the extent to which it shapes eukaryotic genomes is still questionable. The ability to detect and study horizontal gene transfer events is of significant importance to our understanding of its effect on the evolution of eukaryotic genes and genomes. We performed phylogenetic analysis of a published anti-bacterial protein AP1 from potato (Solanum tuberosum). One domain encodes a phosphoesterase with high similarity to an acid phosphatase of Ralstonia solanacearum and closely related Betaproteobacteria. The second domain encodes an UspA-like domain similar to those present in plants. Our phylogenetic analyses suggest that both domains evolved along different evolutionary pathways until they merged into a single gene. We propose that the phosphoesterase domain was acquired by HGT. Our results support claims in favor of HGT detection at the protein domain level. The case of anti-bacterial protein AP1 in potato highlights the significance of gene fusion/protein domain fusion as an important feature of horizontal gene transfer which may contribute substantially to the adaptive abilities of eukaryotic organisms.

The ICP34.5 protein of herpes simplex virus type 1 is a neurovirulence factor that plays critical roles in viral replication and anti-host responses. One of its functions is to recruit protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) that leads to the dephosphorylation of the α subunit of translation initiation factor eIF2 (eIF2α), which is inactivated by infection-induced phosphorylation. As PP1 is a protein phosphatase with a wide range of substrates, the question remains to be answered how ICP34.5 directs PP1 to specifically dephosphorylate eIF2α. Here we report that ICP34.5 not only binds PP1 but also associates with eIF2α by in vitro and in vivo assays. The binding site of eIF2α is identified at amino acids 233–248 of ICP34.5, which falls in the highly homologous region with human gene growth arrest and DNA damage 34. The interaction between ICP34.5 and eIF2α is independent of the phosphorylation status of eIF2α at serine 51. Deletion mutation of this region results in the failure of dephosphorylation of eIF2α by PP1 and, consequently, interrupts viral protein synthesis and replication. Our data illustrated that the binding between viral protein ICP34.5 and the host eIF2α is crucial for the specific dephosphorylation of eIF2α by PP1. We propose that herpes simplex virus protein ICP34.5 bridges PP1 and eIF2α via their binding motifs and thereby facilitates the protein synthesis and viral replication.

SummaryReducing protein synthesis slows growth and development but can increase adult life span. We demonstrate that knockdown of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G (eIF4G), which is downregulated during starvation and dauer state, results in differential translation of genes important for growth and longevity in C. elegans. Genome-wide mRNA translation state analysis showed that inhibition of IFG-1, the C. elegans ortholog of eIF4G, results in a relative increase in ribosomal loading and translation of stress response genes. Some of these genes are required for life span extension when IFG-1 is inhibited. Furthermore, enhanced ribosomal loading of certain mRNAs upon IFG-1 inhibition was correlated with increased mRNA length. This association was supported by changes in the proteome assayed via quantitative mass spectrometry. Our results suggest that IFG-1 mediates the antagonistic effects on growth and somatic maintenance by regulating mRNA translation of particular mRNAs based, in part, on transcript length.

Coronaviruses are a family of enveloped single-stranded positive-sense RNA viruses causing respiratory, enteric, and neurologic diseases in mammals and fowl. Human coronaviruses are recognized to cause up to a third of common colds and are suspected to be involved in enteric and neurologic diseases. Coronavirus replication involves the generation of nested subgenomic mRNAs (sgmRNAs) with a common capped 5′ leader sequence. The translation of most of the sgmRNAs is thought to be cap dependent and displays a requirement for eukaryotic initiation factor 4F (eIF4F), a heterotrimeric complex needed for the recruitment of 40S ribosomes. We recently reported on an ultrahigh-throughput screen to discover compounds that inhibit eIF4F activity by blocking the interaction of two of its subunits (R. Cencic et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108: 1046–1051, 2011). Herein we describe a molecule from this screen that prevents the interaction between eIF4E (the cap-binding protein) and eIF4G (a large scaffolding protein), inhibiting cap-dependent translation. This inhibitor significantly decreased human coronavirus 229E (HCoV-229E) replication, reducing the percentage of infected cells and intra- and extracellular infectious virus titers. Our results support the strategy of targeting the eIF4F complex to block coronavirus infection.

Introduction To construct a eukaryotic expression vector of the tumour suppressor in lung cancer 1 (TSLC1) gene, so as to explore the mechanisms of tumour suppression of the gene theoretically. Material and methods The open reading frame (ORF) of TSLC1 gene was amplified with RT-PCR from normal human foreskin acrobystia, and cloned to pMD19-T simple vector (TA Clone method). The resultant plasmid was transformed into Escherichia coli JM109 for amplification. The TA Clone recombinant was digested by double restriction enzyme (Bgl II/EcoR I) and analysed with agarose gel electrophoresis. The positive one was sequenced. The inserted DNA fragment was recovered, and then it was mounted into the eukaryotic expression vector pIRES2-EGFP, transformed into E. coli JM109 for amplification. A positive recombinant plasmid named pIRES2-EGFP-TSLC1 was confirmed by Bgl II/EcoR I double-enzyme digestion analysis. Results RT-PCR amplified the ORF of the TSLC1 gene. It was approximately 1400 base pairs. The obtained DNA was confirmed a high degree of homology with the sequence of TSLC1 cDNA sequence (AY358334) stored at GenBank. Conclusions Construction of a TSLC1 eukaryotic expression vector was successful, and it has established a solid foundation for further study.

Cycloheximide and congeners as inhibitors of eukaryotic protein synthesis from endophytic actinomycetes Streptomyces sps. YIM56132 and YIM56141

Cells respond to a variety of stresses, including unfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), by phosphorylating a subunit of translation initiation factor eIF2, eIF2α. eIF2α phosphorylation inactivates the eIF2B complex. The inactivation of eIF2B not only suppresses the initiation of protein translation but paradoxically up-regulates the translation and expression of transcription factor ATF-4. Both of these processes are important for the cellular response to ER stress, also termed the unfolded protein response. Here we demonstrate that cellular response resulting from eIF2α phosphorylation is attenuated in several cancer cell lines. The deficiency of the unfolded protein response in these cells correlates with the expression of a specific isoform of a regulatory eIF2B subunit, eIF2Bδ variant 1 (V1). Replacement of total eIF2Bδ with V1 renders cells insensitive to eIF2α phosphorylation; specifically, they neither up-regulate ATF-4 and ATF-4 targets nor suppress protein translation. Expression of variant 2 eIF2Bδ in ER stress response-deficient cells restores the stress response. Our data suggest that V1 does not interact with the eIF2 complex, a requisite for eIF2B inhibition by eIF2α phosphorylation. Together, these data delineate a novel physiological mechanism to regulate the ER stress response with a large potential impact on a variety of diseases that result in ER stress.

Background: Eukaryotic initiation factor 4A3 (eIF4A3) is a member of the Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp (DEAD) box RNA helicase family. There are three subtypes of eIF4A, eIF4A1, 2, and 3. eIF4A1 and eIF4A2 are required for translation initiation as their name suggest, however eIF4A3 is functionally distinct and one of the core components of the exon junction complex (EJC). The EJC is known to be involved in a variety of RNA metabolic processes typified by nonsense-mediated RNA decay (NMD), which is the surveillance mechanism that recognizes mRNAs containing premature termination codons to prevent the accumulation of truncated proteins. It is known that eIF4A3 is an ATP-dependent RNA clamp that can serve as a nucleation center to recruit other EJC components, and siRNA-mediated knockdown of eIF4A3 leads to a defect in NMD. In order to investigate the functions of eIF4A3 further and evaluate the therapeutic potential, we conducted a search for molecular probes of eIF4A3. Methods: Using an RNA dependent ATPase assay as a guide, intensive structure activity relationship (SAR) study and chemical optimization of high-throughput screening hit were conducted. Thereafter, NMD inhibitory activity, selectivity, helicase inhibitory activity, and physicochemical properties of optimized compounds were confirmed. Additionally, direct binding of inhibitors to eIF4A3 and their binding mode were analyzed using biophysical methods. Results: Optimized compounds showed high selectivity for eIF4A3 and exhibited significant NMD inhibitory activity in HEK293T cells. The drastic difference in eIF4A3 inhibitory activity between eutomers and distomer revealed the importance of stereochemistry at the 3-position of the piperazine ring for eIF4A3 inhibition. The lack of significant NMD inhibition by distomers suggests that NMD inhibition of eutomers is mediated by eIF4A3 inhibition. A surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensing assay and hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX MS) provided strong evidence for the direct binding of the inhibitors to eIF4A3 and implications for their binding site. Conclusion: We discovered the first selective eIF4A3 inhibitors exhibiting cellular NMD inhibitory activity. These novel inhibitors not only represent novel molecular probes for investigation of RNA biology but also could be promising lead compounds for drug discovery research. References: [1] Ito, M.; Tanaka, T.; Cary, D. R.; Iwatani-Y, M.; Kamada, Y.; Kawamoto, T.; Aparicio, S.; Nakanishi, A.; Imaeda, Y. Discovery of novel 1,4-diacylpiperazines as selective and cell-active eIF4A3 inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 3335-3351. [2] Iwatani-Y, M.; Ito, M.; Ishibashi, Y.; Oki, H.; Tanaka, T.; Morishita, D.; Ito, T.; Kimura, H.; Imaeda, Y.; Aparicio, S.; Nakanishi, A.; Kawamoto, T., Discovery and characterization of a eukaryotic initiation factor 4A-3-selective inhibitor that suppresses nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. ACS Chem. Biol. 2017, 12, 1760-1768. Citation Format: Masahiro Ito, Misa Iwatani-Yoshihara, Toshio Tanaka, Douglas R. Cary, Yusuke Kamada, Yoshihiro Ishibashi, Hideyuki Oki, Satoshi Sogabe, Shoichi Nakao, Daisuke Morishita, Takashi Ito, Hiromichi Kimura, Tomohiro Kawamoto, Samuel Aparicio, Atsushi Nakanishi, Yasuhiro Imaeda. Discovery of the first selective and cell-active eIF4A3 inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2802.

In protein synthesis initiation, the eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF) 2 (a G protein) functions in its GTP-bound state to deliver initiator methionyl-tRNA (tRNAiMet) to the small ribosomal subunit and is necessary for protein synthesis in all cells1,2. Phosphorylation of eIF2 [eIF2(αP)] is critical for translational control in diverse settings including nutrient deprivation, viral infection and memory formation3,4,5. eIF5 functions in start site selection as a GTPase accelerating protein (GAP) for the eIF2•GTP•tRNAiMet ternary complex (TC) within the ribosome bound pre-initiation complex6,7,8. Here we define new regulatory functions of eIF5 in the recycling of eIF2 from its inactive eIF2•GDP state between successive rounds of translation initiation. Firstly we show that eIF5 stabilizes the binding of GDP to eIF2 and is therefore a bi-functional protein that acts as a GDP dissociation inhibitor (GDI). We find that this activity is independent of the GAP function and identify conserved residues within eIF5 that are necessary for this role. In addition we show that eIF5 is a critical component of the eIF2(αP) regulatory complex that inhibits the activity of the guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) eIF2B. Together our studies define a new step in the translation initiation pathway, one that is critical for normal translational controls.

Viruses depend on cells for their replication but have evolved mechanisms to achieve this in an efficient and, in some instances, a cell‐type‐specific manner. The expression of viral proteins is frequently subject to translational control. The dominant target of such control is the initiation step of protein synthesis. Indeed, during the early stages of infection, viral mRNAs must compete with their host counterparts for the protein synthetic machinery, especially for the limited pool of eukaryotic translation initiation factors (eIFs) that mediate the recruitment of ribosomes to both viral and cellular mRNAs. To circumvent this competition viruses use diverse strategies so that ribosomes can be recruited selectively to viral mRNAs. In this review we focus on the initiation of protein synthesis and outline some of the strategies used by viruses to ensure efficient translation initiation of their mRNAs. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF3, that plays a central role in translation initiation, consists of five core subunits that are present in both the budding yeast and higher eukaryotes. However, higher eukaryotic eIF3 contains additional (non-core) subunits that are absent in the budding yeast. We investigated the role of one such non-core eIF3 subunit eIF3h, encoded by two distinct genes – eif3ha and eif3hb, as a regulator of embryonic development in zebrafish. Both eif3h genes are expressed during early embryogenesis, and display overlapping yet distinct and highly dynamic spatial expression patterns. Loss of function analysis using specific morpholino oligomers indicates that each isoform has specific as well as redundant functions during early development. The morphant phenotypes correlate with their spatial expression patterns, indicating that eif3h regulates development of the brain, heart, vasculature, and lateral line. These results indicate that the non-core subunits of eIF3 regulate specific developmental programs during vertebrate embryogenesis.

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E, a potent oncogene, is highly regulated. One class of eIF4E regulators, including eIF4G and the 4E-binding proteins (4E-BPs), interact with eIF4E using a conserved YXXXXLΦ-binding site. The structural basis of this interaction and its regulation are well established. Really Interesting New Gene (RING) domain containing proteins, such as the promyelocytic leukemia protein PML and the arenaviral protein Z, represent a second class of eIF4E regulators that inhibit eIF4E function by decreasing eIF4E’s affinity for its m 7 G cap ligand. To elucidate the structural basis of this inhibition, we determined the structure of Z and studied the Z-eIF4E complex using NMR methods. We show that Z interacts with eIF4E via a novel binding site, which has no homology with that of eIF4G or the 4E-BPs, and is different from the RING recognition site used in the ubiquitin system. Z and eIF4G interact with distinct parts of eIF4E and differentially alter the conformation of the m 7 G cap-binding site. Our results provide a molecular basis for how PML and Z RINGs reduce the affinity of eIF4E for the m 7 G cap and thereby act as key inhibitors of eIF4E function. Furthermore, our findings provide unique insights into RING protein interactions.

Translation initiation plays an important role in cell growth, proliferation, and survival. The translation initiation factor eIF4B (eukaryotic initiation factor 4B) stimulates the RNA helicase activity of eIF4A in unwinding secondary structures in the 5' untranslated region (5'UTR) of the mRNA in vitro. Here, we studied the effects of eIF4B depletion in cells using RNA interference (RNAi). In agreement with the role of eIF4B in translation initiation, its depletion resulted in inhibition of this step. Selective reduction of translation was observed for mRNAs harboring strong to moderate secondary structures in their 5'UTRs. These mRNAs encode proteins, which function in cell proliferation (Cdc25C, c-myc, and ODC [ornithine decarboxylase]) and survival (Bcl-2 and XIAP [X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis]). Furthermore, eIF4B silencing led to decreased proliferation rates, promoted caspase-dependent apoptosis, and further sensitized cells to camptothecin-induced cell death. These results demonstrate that eIF4B is required for cell proliferation and survival by regulating the translation of proliferative and prosurvival mRNAs.

The gene LOC791917 Danio rerio (zebrafish) encodes a protein annotated in the UniProt knowledgebase1 as the “middle domain of eukaryotic initiation factor 4G domain containing protein b” (MIF4Gdb). Its molecular weight is 25.8 kDa, and it comprises 222 amino acid residues. BLAST searches revealed homologues of D. rerio MIF4Gdb in many eukaryotes including humans.2 The homologues and MIF4Gdb were identified as members of the Pfam family, MIF4G (PF02854), which is named after the middle domain of eukaryotic initiation factor 4G (eIF4G).3-5 eIF4G is a component of eukaryotic translational initiation complex, and contains binding sites for other initiation factors, suggesting its critical role in translational initiation.6 The MIF4G domain also occurs in several other proteins involved in RNA metabolism, including the Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay 2 protein (NMD2/UPF2), and the nuclear cap-binding protein 80-kD subunit (CBP80).5 Sequence and structure analysis of the MIF4G domains in many proteins indicates that the domain assumes all helical fold and has tandem repeated motifs.5,7 The zebrafish protein described here has homology to domains of other proteins variously referred to as NIC-containing proteins (NMD2, eIF4G, CBP80). The biological function of D. rerio MIF4Gdb has not yet been experimentally characterized, and the annotation is based on amino acid sequence comparison. D. rerio MIF4Gdb did not share more than 25% sequence identity with any protein for which the three-dimensional structure is known and was selected as a target for structure determination by the Center for Eukaryotic Structural Genomics (CESG). Here, we report the crystal structure of D. rerio MIF4Gdb (UniGene code Dr.79360, UniProt code {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"Q5EAQ1","term_id":"82178873","term_text":"Q5EAQ1"}}Q5EAQ1, CESG target number GO.79294).

Protein synthesis is principally regulated at the initiation stage (rather than during elongation or termination), allowing rapid, reversible and spatial control over gene expression. Progress over recent years in determining the structures and activities of initiation factors, and in mapping their interactions within ribosomal initiation complexes, has significantly advanced our understanding of the complex translation initiation process. These developments have provided a solid foundation for studies of regulation of initiation by mechanisms that include modulation of the activity of initiation factors (which affects almost all scanning-dependent initiation), or via sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins and microRNAs (which thus impact individual mRNAs).

The iron–sulphur (Fe–S)-containing RNase L inhibitor (Rli1) is involved in ribosomal subunit maturation, transport of both ribosomal subunits to the cytoplasm, and translation initiation through interaction with the eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3) complex. Here, we present a new function for Rli1 in translation termination. Through co-immunoprecipitation experiments, we show that Rli1 interacts physically with the translation termination factors eukaryotic release factor 1 (eRF1)/Sup45 and eRF3/Sup35 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetic interactions were uncovered between a strain depleted for Rli1 and sup35-21 or sup45-2. Furthermore, we show that downregulation of RLI1 expression leads to defects in the recognition of a stop codon, as seen in mutants of other termination factors. By contrast, RLI1 overexpression partly suppresses the read-through defects in sup45-2. Interestingly, we find that although the Fe–S cluster is not required for the interaction of Rli1 with eRF1 or its other interacting partner, Hcr1, from the initiation complex eIF3, it is required for its activity in translation termination; an Fe–S cluster mutant of RLI1 cannot suppress the read-through defects of sup45-2.

Initiation of protein synthesis in mitochondria and chloroplasts normally uses a formylated initiator methionyl-tRNA (fMet-tRNA(f)(Met)). However, mitochondrial protein synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae can initiate with nonformylated Met-tRNA(f)(Met), as demonstrated in yeast mutants in which the nuclear gene encoding mitochondrial methionyl-tRNA formyltransferase (FMT1) has been deleted. The role of formylation of the initiator tRNA is not known, but in vitro formylation increases binding of Met-tRNA(f)(Met) to translation initiation factor 2 (IF2). We hypothesize the existence of an accessory factor that assists mitochondrial IF2 (mIF2) in utilizing unformylated Met-tRNA(f)(Met). This accessory factor might be unnecessary when formylated Met-tRNA(f)(Met) is present but becomes essential when only the unformylated species are available. Using a synthetic petite genetic screen in yeast, we identified a mutation in the AEP3 gene that caused a synthetic respiratory-defective phenotype together with Delta fmt1. The same aep3 mutation also caused a synthetic respiratory defect in cells lacking formylated Met-tRNA(f)(Met) due to loss of the MIS1 gene that encodes the mitochondrial C(1)-tetrahydrofolate synthase. The AEP3 gene encodes a peripheral mitochondrial inner membrane protein that stabilizes mitochondrially encoded ATP6/8 mRNA. Here we show that the AEP3 protein (Aep3p) physically interacts with yeast mIF2 both in vitro and in vivo and promotes the binding of unformylated initiator tRNA to yeast mIF2. We propose that Aep3p functions as an accessory initiation factor in mitochondrial protein synthesis.

It has been shown previously that in mammalian cells, interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats-1(IFIT1) is rapidly synthesized in response to viral infection, functions as an inhibitor of translation by binding to the eukaryotic initiation factor-3, and consequently assigns resistive activity against viral invasion to cells. It has also been reported that IFIT1 is rapidly produced in response to other cell stress agents with no direct relation to virus such as bacterial lipopolysaccharide and interleukin-1, but its function under these non-viral infection cell stress conditions has yet to be elucidated. Here, we demonstrate an interaction between IFIT1 and eukaryotic elongation factor-1A (eEF1A) both in vitro, using recombinant proteins as bait in pull-down assays, and in vivo, using laser confocal microscopy and immunoprecipitation. In addition, we report the initial determination of the domain of IFIT1 that mediates this interaction. We also display that both IFIT1 and eEF1A protein levels are rapidly elevated, prolonged in tumor necrosis factor alpha pre-treated Raw264.7 cells, and most of those cells are induced to death by the end of investigations. Our results imply that under some stressful stimulations IFIT1 may participate in cell death pathways by interaction with eEF1A.

ABC50 is an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) protein, which, unlike most ABC proteins, does not possess membrane-spanning domains. ABC50 interacts with eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2), which plays a key role in translation initiation and its control. ABC50 binds to ribosomes, and this interaction requires both the N-terminal domain and at least one ABC domain. Knockdown of ABC50 by RNA interference impaired translation of both cap-dependent and -independent reporters, consistent with a positive role for ABC50 in the function of eIF2, which is required for both types of translation initiation. Mutation of the Walker box A or B motifs in both ABC regions of ABC50 yielded a mutant protein that exerted a dominant-interfering phenotype with respect to protein synthesis and translation initiation. Importantly, although dominant-interfering mutants of ABC50 impaired cap-dependent translation, translation driven by certain internal ribosome entry segments was not inhibited. ABC50 is located in the cytoplasm and nucleoplasm but not in the nucleolus. Thus, ABC50 is not likely to be directly involved in early ribosomal biogenesis, unlike some other ABC proteins. Taken together, the present data show that ABC50 plays a key role in translation initiation and has functions that are distinct from those of other non-membrane ABC proteins.

Translational control mechanisms are, besides transcriptional control and mRNA stability, the most determining for final protein levels. A large number of accessory factors that assist the ribosome during initiation, elongation, and termination of translation are required for protein synthesis. Cap-dependent translational control occurs mainly during the initiation step, involving eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) and accessory proteins. Initiation is affected by various stimuli that influence the phosphorylation status of both eIF4E and eIF2 and through binding of 4E-binding proteins to eIF4E, which finally inhibits cap- dependent translation. Under conditions where cap-dependent translation is hampered, translation of transcripts containing an internal ribosome entry site can still be supported in a cap-independent manner. An interesting example of translational control is the switch between cap-independent and cap-dependent translation during the eukaryotic cell cycle. At the G1-to-S transition, translation occurs predominantly in a cap-dependent manner, while during the G2-to-M transition, cap-dependent translation is inhibited and transcripts are predominantly translated through a cap-independent mechanism.

Viral infection usually influences cellular protein synthesis either actively or passively via modification of various translation initiation factors. Here we demonstrated that infection with avian reovirus (ARV) interfered with cellular protein synthesis. This study demonstrated for the first time that ARV influenced the phosphorylation of translation initiation factors including eIF4E and eIF-4G. Interestingly, ARV also induced phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation elongation factor (eEF2) in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Inhibition of mTOR by rapamycin notably increased the level of phosphorylated eEF2 in infected cells. However, rapamycin did not show any negative effects on ARV replication, suggesting that phosphorylation of eEF2 in infected cells did not reduce ARV propagation. These results demonstrated for the first time that ARV promotes phosphorylation of eEF2 which in turn influenced host protein production not simply by modulating the function of translation initiation factors but also by regulating elongation factor eEF2.

Viral internal ribosomal entry sites (IRESs) mediate end-independent translation initiation. There are 4 major structurally-distinct IRES groups: type 1 (e.g., poliovirus) and type 2 (e.g., encephalomyocarditis virus), which are dissimilar except for a Yn-Xm-AUG motif at their 3′ borders, type 3 (e.g., hepatitis C virus), and type 4 (dicistroviruses). Type 2–4 IRESs mediate initiation by distinct mechanisms that are nevertheless all based on specific noncanonical interactions with canonical components of the translation apparatus, such as eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4G (type 2), 40S ribosomal subunits (types 3 and 4), and eIF3 (type 3). The mechanism of initiation on type 1 IRESs is unknown. We now report that domain V of type 1 IRESs, which is adjacent to the Yn-Xm-AUG motif, specifically interacts with the central domain of eIF4G. The position and orientation of eIF4G relative to the Yn-Xm-AUG motif is analogous in type 1 and 2 IRESs. eIF4G promotes recruitment of eIF4A to type 1 IRESs, and together, eIF4G and eIF4A induce conformational changes at their 3′ borders. The ability of mutant type 1 IRESs to bind eIF4G/eIF4A correlated with their translational activity. These characteristics parallel the mechanism of initiation on type 2 IRESs, in which the key event is binding of eIF4G to the J–K domain adjacent to the Yn-Xm-AUG motif, which is enhanced by eIF4A. These data suggest that fundamental aspects of the mechanisms of initiation on these unrelated classes of IRESs are similar.

Eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) has long been known as the cap-binding protein that participates in recruitment of mRNA to the ribosome. A number of recent advances have not only increased our understanding of how eIF4E acts in translation but also uncovered non-translational roles. New structures have been determined for eIF4E in complex with various ligands and for other cap-binding proteins. We have also learned that most eukaryotic organisms express multiple eIF4E family members, some involved in general translation but others having specialized functions, including repression of translation. A number of new eIF4E-binding proteins have been reported, some of which tether it to specific mRNAs.

Although the roles of Jak-Stat pathways in type I and II interferon (IFN)-dependent transcriptional regulation are well established, the precise mechanisms of mRNA translation for IFN-sensitive genes remain to be defined. We examined the effects of IFNs on the phosphorylation/activation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4B (eIF4B). Our data show that eIF4B is phosphorylated on Ser422 during treatment of sensitive cells with alpha IFN (IFN-alpha) or IFN-gamma. Such phosphorylation is regulated, in a cell type-specific manner, by either the p70 S6 kinase (S6K) or the p90 ribosomal protein S6K (RSK) and results in enhanced interaction of the protein with eIF3A (p170/eIF3A) and increased associated ATPase activity. Our data also demonstrate that IFN-inducible eIF4B activity and IFN-stimulated gene 15 protein (ISG15) or IFN-gamma-inducible chemokine CXCL-10 protein expression are diminished in S6k1/S6k2 double-knockout mouse embryonic fibroblasts. In addition, IFN-alpha-inducible ISG15 protein expression is blocked by eIF4B or eIF3A knockdown, establishing a requirement for these proteins in mRNA translation/protein expression by IFNs. Importantly, the generation of IFN-dependent growth inhibitory effects on primitive leukemic progenitors is dependent on activation of the S6K/eIF4B or RSK/eIF4B pathway. Taken together, our findings establish critical roles for S6K and RSK in the induction of IFN-dependent biological effects and define a key regulatory role for eIF4B as a common mediator and integrator of IFN-generated signals from these kinases.

Viruses often use host machinery in unusual ways to execute different steps during their replication. To identify host factors critical for virus replication, we screened cDNA expression libraries for genes or gene fragments that could interfere with HIV-1 vector transduction. The DNA clone that most potently inhibited HIV-1 expression encoded the N-terminal 91 aa of the eukaryotic initiation factor 3 subunit f (N91-eIF3f). Overexpression of N91-eIF3f or full-length eIF3f drastically restricted HIV-1 replication by reducing nuclear and cytoplasmic viral mRNA levels. N91-eIF3f and eIF3f specifically targeted the 3′ long terminal repeat (3′LTR) region in the viral mRNA. We show that the 3′ end cleavage of HIV-1 mRNA precursors is specifically reduced in N91-eIF3f expressing cells. Our results suggest a role of eIF3f in mRNA maturation and that it can specifically interfere with the 3′ end processing of HIV-1 mRNAs.

The main mechanisms advanced to account for the specificity of the initiation of protein synthesis are reviewed. A mechanism proposed by Shine and Dalgarno (SD), focused on the base pairing of a unique leader sequence in the initiation site--the SD sequence--with the 3' end of the 30S ribosomal RNA as the only step necessary for selecting the initiation site in prokaryotes. Studies showed, however, that the SD interaction is not obligatory and protein synthesis can occur even in its absence. In fact, comparison of a large number of initiation site sequences revealed that the sites are composed of diverse combinations of preferred bases, and, thus, the apparatus that is able to recognize all these sites is de facto a multisubstrate enzyme system. As such, it has the hallmarks of the cumulative specificity mechanism, and the SD interaction, when present, is only one of a number of contributing factors in the selection of the initiation site. The cumulative specificity mechanism proposed that secondary structure selectively interdicts access to most of the non-initiator methionine codons while leaving open the true initiation site and that the final recognition of the initiation site occurs by cooperativity and cumulative specificity of the several ligand recognition sites of the ribosomes, which confer broad substrate specificity to the system. This mechanism appears to be universal; it can encompass the initiation of all protein syntheses since it is consistent with all the salient observations on the initiation of both eukaryotic and prokaryotic protein syntheses. Studies of eukaryotic/prokaryotic hybrid systems further strengthen this conclusion: They show that the prokaryotic initiation signals are evolutionarily conserved in the eukaryotic mRNAs, since prokaryotic ribosomes are able to translate eukaryotic mRNAs. Conversely, eukaryotic ribosomes also recognize prokaryotic initiation signals and initiate synthesis, indicating that the eukaryotic ribosomes may have also conserved the prokaryotic initiation mechanism. The universality of a single process of protein synthesis in all kingdoms is also manifest in the conservation of a complex apparatus, consisting of ribosomes, mRNA's, tRNA's including an initiator methionyl-tRNA, aminoacyl tRNA synthetases, and other protein factors. Thus, the mechanism of initiation of protein synthesis is conserved, and it is universal. The third initiation mechanism is the scanning mechanism for eukaryotes. It proposes that the 40S ribosome-methionyl-tRNA complex recognizes and binds to the 5'-end of the mRNA and the complex then scans the messenger for the initiator codon. Once it is located, the 80S ribosome initiation complex is formed with the 60S subunit and initiation is completed when a second aminoacyl-tRNA is bound and a peptide bond is formed. Exceptions to this mechanism were observed, where the ribosome bound directly to internal mRNA sites and initiated synthesis. Consideration of the conflicting observations in this review, however, has led to the conclusion that the primary eukaryotic mechanism is a conserved prokaryotic mechanism and that the "scanning process" involves two steps. The first step is an interaction of the initiation factors with the cap, which makes the IS accessible, and the second, initiation of translation by the conserved prokaryotic mechanism.

The HCV IRES is a highly structured RNA which mediates cap-independent translation initiation in higher eukaryotes. This function is encoded in conserved structural motifs in the two major domains of HCV and HCV-like IRESs, which play crucial and distinct roles along the initiation pathway. In this review, I discuss structural features of IRES domains and how these RNA motifs function as RNA-based initiation factors to form 48S initiation complexes and 80S ribosomes with only a subset of canonical, protein-based eukaryotic initiation factors.

Protein-RNA interactions are involved in all facets of RNA biology. The identification of small molecules that selectively block such bimolecular interactions could provide insight into previously unexplored steps of gene regulation. Such is the case for regulation of eukaryotic protein synthesis where interactions between messenger RNA (mRNA) and several eukaryotic initiation factors govern the recruitment of 40S ribosomes (and associated factors) to mRNA templates during the initiation phase. We have designed simple fluorescence polarization-based high-throughput screening assays that query the binding of several translation factors to RNA and found that the mixed inhibitor p-chloromercuribenzoate interferes with poly(A) binding protein-RNA interaction.

Postendosymbiotic evolution has given rise to proteins that are multiply targeted within the cell. Various mechanisms have been identified to permit the expression of proteins encoding distinct N termini from a single gene. One mechanism involves alternative translation initiation (aTI). We previously showed evidence of aTI activity within the Arabidopsis thaliana organellar DNA polymerase gene POLγ2. Translation initiates at four distinct sites within this gene, two non-AUG, to produce distinct plastid and mitochondrially targeted forms of the protein. To understand the regulation of aTI in higher plants, we used Polγ2 as a model to investigate both cis- and trans-acting features of the process. Here, we show that aTI in Polγ2 and other plant genes involves ribosome scanning dependent on sequence context at the multiple initiation sites to condition specific binding of at least one trans-acting factor essential for site recognition. Multiple active translation initiation sites appear to operate in several plant genes, often to expand protein targeting. In plants, where the mitochondrion and plastid must share a considerable portion of their proteomes and coordinate their functions, leaky ribosome scanning behavior provides adaptive advantage in the evolution of protein dual targeting and translational regulation.

The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe homologue of the p40/eIF3h subunit of mammalian translation initiation factor eIF3 has been characterized in this study. We show that this protein physically associates with the 40S ribosomal particles as a constituent of the multimeric eIF3 protein complex, which consists of all five known eIF3 core subunits (eIF3a, eIF3b, eIF3c, eIF3g and eIF3i) as well as the five non-core subunits (eIF3d, eIF3e, eIF3f, eIF3h and eIF3m) that constitute an eIF3 holocomplex in fission yeast. However, affinity purification of eIF3 from fission yeast cells expressing TAP-tagged eIF3h suggests the presence of distinct forms of eIF3 that differ in their composition of the non-core subunits. Further characterization of eIF3h shows that strains lacking eif3h+ (eif3hΔ) are viable and show no gross defects, either in vegetative growth or in the rate of in vivo protein synthesis. Polysome profile analysis shows no apparent defects in translation initiation. Furthermore, deletion of eif3h+ does not affect the ability of the other eIF3 subunits to remain associated with one another in a tight protein complex similar to the situation in wild-type cells. Additionally, we show that human eIF3h can functionally substitute fission yeast eIF3h in complementing in vivo a genetic deletion of eif3h+. Interestingly, mutant eif3hΔ cells show several prominent phenotypic properties. They are hypersensitive to caffeine and highly defective in meiosis, producing either no spores or incomplete tetrads with a very high frequency. The implications of these results in relation to the functions of eIF3h in Sz. pombe are discussed. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

In multiple human cancers, the function of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) is elevated and directly related to disease progression. Overexpression or hyperactivation of eIF4E in experimental models can drive cellular transformation and malignant progression. Elevated eIF4E function triggers enhanced assembly of the eIF4F translation initiation complex and thereby drives cap-dependent translation. Though all capped mRNAs require eIF4F for translation, a pool of mRNAs are exceptionally dependent on elevated eIF4F activity for translation and are thereby selectively and disproportionately affected by altered eIF4F activity. These mRNAs encode proteins that play significant roles in all aspects of malignancy including angiogenesis factors (VEGF, FGF-2), onco-proteins (c-myc, cyclin D1, ODC), pro-survival proteins (survivin, BCL-2) and proteins involved in tumor invasion and metastasis (MMP-9, heparanase). Recent advances in targeting the eIF4F complex have highlighted the role for this complex in tumor cell survival and angiogenesis and have illuminated the enhanced susceptibility of the tumor cells to inhibition of the eIF4F complex. These studies have demonstrated the attractiveness and plausibility of targeting eIF4E and the eIF4F translation initiation complex for cancer therapy and have prompted the advance of the first eIF4E-specific therapy to the clinic.

Decades of research have yielded significant insight into the mechanism by which a cell translates an mRNA into the encoded protein. However many of the molecular details of the process remain a mystery. Translation initiation is an important control point in gene expression, and misregulation can lead to diseases such as cancer. A better understanding of the mechanism of translation initiation is imperative for the development of novel therapeutic agents. Recently, a combination of genetic, biochemical and biophysical studies has begun to shed light on how, at a molecular level, the translational machinery initiates protein synthesis. In the present review, we briefly compare and contrast the initiation pathways utilized by bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes, and then focus on translation initiation in eukaryotes and recent advances in our understanding of the subunit joining step of the process.

A variety of cellular processes rely on G-proteins, which cycle through active GTP-bound and inactive GDP-bound forms. The switch between these states is commonly regulated by GEFs (guanine-nucleotide-exchange factors) and GAPs (GTPase-activating proteins). Although G-proteins have structural similarity, GEFs are very diverse proteins. A complex example of this system is seen in eukaryotic translation initiation between eIF (eukaryotic initiation factor) 2, a G-protein, its five-subunit GEF, eIF2B, and its GAP, eIF5. eIF2 delivers Met-tRNAi (initiator methionyl-tRNA) to the 40S ribosomal subunit before mRNA binding. Upon AUG recognition, eIF2 hydrolyses GTP, aided by eIF5. eIF2B then re-activates eIF2 by removing GDP, thereby promoting association of GTP. In the present article, we review data from studies of representative G-protein–GEF pairs and compare these with observations from our research on eIF2 and eIF2B to propose a model for how interactions between eIF2B and eIF2 promote guanine nucleotide exchange.

In addition to its conventional role during protein synthesis, eukaryotic elongation factor 1A is involved in other cellular processes. Several regions of interaction between eukaryotic elongation factor 1A and the translational apparatus or the cytoskeleton have been identified, yet the roles of the different post-translational modifications of eukaryotic elongation factor 1A are completely unknown. One amino acid modification, which so far has only been found in eukaryotic elongation factor 1A, consists of ethanolamine-phosphoglycerol attached to two glutamate residues that are conserved between mammals and plants. We now report that ethanolamine-phosphoglycerol is also present in eukaryotic elongation factor 1A of the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma brucei, indicating that this unique protein modification is of ancient origin. In addition, using RNA-mediated gene silencing against enzymes of the Kennedy pathway, we demonstrate that phosphatidylethanolamine is a direct precursor of the ethanolamine-phosphoglycerol moiety. Down-regulation of the expression of ethanolamine kinase and ethanolamine-phosphate cytidylyltransferase results in inhibition of phosphatidylethanolamine synthesis in T. brucei procyclic forms and, concomitantly, in a block in glycosylphosphatidylinositol attachment to procyclins and ethanolamine-phosphoglycerol modification of eukaryotic elongation factor 1A.

The SR protein SF2/ASF has been initially characterized as a splicing factor but has also been shown to mediate postsplicing activities such as mRNA export and translation. Here we demonstrate that SF2/ASF promotes translation initiation of bound mRNAs and that this activity requires the presence of the cytoplasmic cap-binding protein eIF4E. SF2/ASF promotes translation initiation by suppressing the activity of 4E-BP, a competitive inhibitor of cap-dependent translation. This activity is mediated by interactions of SF2/ASF with both mTOR and the phosphatase PP2A, two key regulators of 4E-BP phosphorylation. These findings suggest the model whereby SF2/ASF functions as an adaptor protein to recruit the signaling molecules responsible for regulation of cap-dependent translation of specific mRNAs. Taken together, these data suggest a novel mechanism for the activation of translation initiation of a subset of mRNAs bound by the shuttling protein SF2/ASF.

Translational control is an important strategy by which eukaryotic cells regulate gene expression. Translation is the last step in the flow of genetic information, and regulation at this level allows an immediate and rapid response to changes under physiological conditions. Because the processes of mRNA biogenesis, including transcription, splicing, and export to the cytoplasm, are time consuming, the use of pre-existing mRNAs via the control of translation is advantageous in many circumstances. A prime target of translational control is the initiation factor eIF4E, which recognizes the m7GpppN cap structure present at the 5′ end of all nuclear transcribed eukaryotic mRNAs. In this article I describe the discovery of eIF4E, its mechanism of action in translation initiation, and its role in the control of cancer and innate immunity.

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A (eIF5A) is a protein that is highly conserved and essential for cell viability. This factor is the only protein known to contain the unique and essential amino acid residue hypusine. This work focused on the structural and functional characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae eIF5A. The tertiary structure of yeast eIF5A was modeled based on the structure of its Leishmania mexicana homologue and this model was used to predict the structural localization of new site-directed and randomly generated mutations. Most of the 40 new mutants exhibited phenotypes that resulted from eIF-5A protein-folding defects. Our data provided evidence that the C-terminal α-helix present in yeast eIF5A is an essential structural element, whereas the eIF5A N-terminal 10 amino acid extension not present in archaeal eIF5A homologs, is not. Moreover, the mutants containing substitutions at or in the vicinity of the hypusine modification site displayed nonviable or temperature-sensitive phenotypes and were defective in hypusine modification. Interestingly, two of the temperature-sensitive strains produced stable mutant eIF5A proteins – eIF5AK56A and eIF5AQ22H,L93F– and showed defects in protein synthesis at the restrictive temperature. Our data revealed important structural features of eIF5A that are required for its vital role in cell viability and underscored an essential function of eIF5A in the translation step of gene expression.

Activating transcription factor (ATF) 5 is a transcription factor belonging to the ATF/cAMP-response element-binding protein gene family. We previously reported that ATF5 mRNA expression increased in response to amino acid limitation. The ATF5 gene allows transcription of mRNAs with at least two alternative 5'-untranslated regions (5'-UTRs), 5'-UTRalpha and 5'-UTRbeta, derived from exon1alpha and exon1beta. 5'-UTRalpha contains highly conserved sequences, in which the upstream open reading frames (uORFs) uORF1 and uORF2 are found in many species. This study was designed to investigate the potential role of 5'-UTRs in translational control. These 5'-UTRs differentially determined translation efficiency from mRNA. The presence of 5'-UTRalpha or 5'-UTRbeta represses translation from the downstream ATF5 ORF. Moreover, 5'-UTRalpha-regulated translational repression is released by amino acid limitation or NaAsO(2) exposure. This release was not seen for 5'-UTRbeta. Mutation of uAUG2 in the uORF2 of 5'-UTRalpha restored the basal expression and abolished the positive regulation by amino acid limitation or arsenite exposure. We demonstrated that phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2alpha was required for amino acid limitation-induced translational regulation of ATF5. Furthermore, arsenite exposure activated the exogenously expressed heme-regulated inhibitor kinase and induced the phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2alpha in nonerythroid cells. These results suggest that translation of ATF5 is regulated by the alternative 5'-UTR region of its mRNA, and ATF5 may play a role in protecting cells from amino acid limitation or arsenite-induced oxidative stress.