151. What drives antimicrobial prescribing for companion animals? A mixed-methods study of UK veterinary clinics
- Author
-
Ana Mateus, Dan G. O’Neill, Clare I R Chandler, Alice Tompson, Dave C. Brodbelt, and Yui-Mei Chang
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,040301 veterinary sciences ,030231 tropical medicine ,Context (language use) ,Drug Prescriptions ,Veterinarians ,0403 veterinary science ,Hospitals, Animal ,03 medical and health sciences ,Dogs ,0302 clinical medicine ,Antibiotic resistance ,Anti-Infective Agents ,Food Animals ,Epidemiology ,medicine ,Animals ,Social environment ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,Odds ratio ,Random effects model ,Antimicrobial ,United Kingdom ,Confidence interval ,Family medicine ,Female ,Animal Science and Zoology ,Psychology - Abstract
Antimicrobial use in companion animals is a largely overlooked contributor to the complex problem of antimicrobial resistance. Humans and companion animals share living spaces and some classes of antimicrobials, including those categorised as Highest Priority Critically Important Antimicrobials (HPCIAs). Veterinary guidelines recommend that these agents are not used as routine first line treatment and their frequent deployment could offer a surrogate measure of 'inappropriate' antimicrobial use. Anthropological methods provide a complementary means to understand how medicines use makes sense 'on-the-ground' and situated in the broader social context. This mixed-methods study sought to investigate antimicrobial use in companion animals whilst considering the organisational context in which increasing numbers of veterinarians work. Its aims were to i) to epidemiologically analyse the variation in the percentage of antimicrobial events comprising of HPCIAs in companion animal dogs attending UK clinics belonging to large veterinary groups and, ii) to analyse how the organisational structure of companion animal practice influences antimicrobial use, based on insight gained from anthropological fieldwork. A VetCompassTM dataset composed of 468,665 antimicrobial dispensing events in 240,998 dogs from June 2012 to June 2014 was analysed. A hierarchical model for HPCIA usage was built using a backwards elimination approach with clinic and dog identity numbers included as random effects, whilst veterinary group, age quartile, breed and clinic region were included as fixed effects. The largest odds ratio of an antimicrobial event comprising of a HPCIA by veterinary group was 7.34 (95% confidence interval 5.14 - 10.49), compared to the lowest group (p
- Published
- 2020