151. RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-methylundecanol, CAS Registry Number 10522-26-6.
- Author
-
Api, A.M., Belsito, D., Bhatia, S., Bruze, M., Calow, P., Dagli, M.L., Dekant, W., Fryer, A.D., Kromidas, L., La Cava, S., Lalko, J.F., Lapczynski, A., Liebler, D.C., Penning, T.M., Politano, V.T., Ritacco, G., Salvito, D., Schultz, T.W., Shen, J., and Sipes, I.G.
- Subjects
- *
HEXANOLS , *GENETIC toxicology , *REPRODUCTIVE toxicology , *SKIN inflammation , *DEVELOPMENTAL toxicology , *ULTRAVIOLET spectrometers - Abstract
This material was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, as well as environmental safety. Data from the suitable read across analogs 2-butyloctan-1-ol (CAS # 3913-02-8) and 2-ethyl-1-hexanol (CAS # 104-76-7) show that this material is not genotoxic nor does it have skin sensitization potential. The reproductive and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were completed using the TTC (Threshold of Toxicological Concern) for a Cramer Class I material (0.03 and 1.4 mg/day, respectively). The repeated dose toxicity endpoint was completed using 2-ethyl-1-hexanol (CAS # 104-76-7) and 1-heptanol, 2-propyl (CAS # 10042-59-8) as suitable read across analogs, which provided a MOE > 100. The developmental toxicity endpoint was completed using 2-ethyl-1-hexanol (CAS # 104-76-7) as a suitable read across analog, which provided a MOE > 100 The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoint was completed based on suitable UV spectra. The environmental endpoint was completed as described in the RIFM Framework. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF