101. Variation in Calculating and Reporting Antimalarial Efficacy against Plasmodium falciparum in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review of Published Reports.
- Author
-
Plucinski MM, Hastings IM, Moriarty LF, Venkatesan M, Felger I, and Halsey ES
- Subjects
- Africa South of the Sahara epidemiology, Analysis of Variance, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Guideline Adherence statistics & numerical data, Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Malaria, Falciparum mortality, Malaria, Falciparum parasitology, Plasmodium falciparum genetics, Plasmodium falciparum growth & development, Plasmodium falciparum pathogenicity, Recurrence, Treatment Outcome, Antimalarials therapeutic use, Artemisinins therapeutic use, Drug Resistance genetics, Malaria, Falciparum drug therapy, Malaria, Falciparum epidemiology, Plasmodium falciparum drug effects
- Abstract
Antimalarials, in particular artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs), are critical tools in reducing the global burden of malaria, which is concentrated in sub-Saharan Africa. Performing and reporting antimalarial efficacy studies in a transparent and standardized fashion permit comparison of efficacy outcomes across countries and time periods. This systematic review summarizes study compliance with WHO laboratory and reporting guidance pertaining to antimalarial therapeutic efficacy studies and evaluates how well studies from sub-Saharan Africa adhered to these guidelines. We included all published studies (January 2020 or before) performed in sub-Saharan Africa where ACT efficacy for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum infection was reported. The primary outcome was a composite indicator for study methodology consistent with WHO guidelines for statistical analysis of corrected efficacy, defined as an article presenting a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of corrected efficacy or reporting a per-protocol analysis where new infections were excluded from the numerator and denominator. Of 581 articles screened, we identified 279 for the review. Molecular correction was used in 83% (232/279) to distinguish new infections from recrudescences in subjects experiencing recurrent parasitemia. Only 45% (99/221) of articles with therapeutic efficacy as a primary outcome and performing molecular correction reported corrected efficacy outcomes calculated in a way consistent with WHO recommendations. These results indicate a widespread lack of compliance with WHO-recommended methods of analysis, which may result in biases in how antimalarial effectiveness is being measured and reported from sub-Saharan Africa.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF