Search

In the auditory system, tonotopy is postulated to be the substrate for a place code, where sound frequency is encoded by the location of the neurons that fire during the stimulus. Though conceptually simple, the computations that allow for the representation of intensity and complex sounds are poorly understood. Here, a mathematical framework is developed in order to define clearly the conditions that support a place code. To accommodate both frequency and intensity information, the neural network is described as a space with elements that represent individual neurons and clusters of neurons. A mapping is then constructed from acoustic space to neural space so that frequency and intensity are encoded, respectively, by the location and size of the clusters. Algebraic operations -addition and multiplication- are derived to elucidate the rules for representing, assembling, and modulating multi-frequency sound in networks. The resulting outcomes of these operations are consistent with network simulations as well as with electrophysiological and psychophysical data. The analyses show how both frequency and intensity can be encoded with a purely place code, without the need for rate or temporal coding schemes. The algebraic operations are used to describe loudness summation and suggest a mechanism for the critical band. The mathematical approach complements experimental and computational approaches and provides a foundation for interpreting data and constructing models., Author summary One way of encoding sensory information in the brain is with a so-called place code. In the auditory system, tones of increasing frequencies activate sets of neurons at progressively different locations along an axis. The goal of this study is to elucidate the mathematical principles for representing tone frequency and intensity in neural networks. The rigorous, formal process ensures that the conditions for a place code and the associated computations are defined precisely. This mathematical approach offers new insights into experimental data and a framework for constructing network models.

Objective: A technological survey was carried out, with the objective of obtaining information about the existence of equipament, with assesses the sound location during the Central Auditory Processing Test. Methodology: The search was carried out using the INPI, Espacenet, Patentscope e Patentinspiration databases. The terms “localization”, “sound”, “auditive” and “loudness perception” were used, interconnected by boolean operators “AND” e “OR”, to form various algorithms. The research was carried out in the title and summart Fields, using terms in Portuguese in national patentes and English in international patents. In veiw of the recorvered patentes. Result and Discussion: In view of the recorvered, 3 were considered to be close to the research topic. However, only of them served to guide the parameters of the patente under study. Conclusion: However, none refers to the use of equipament in order to assess the ability of localization during the assessment of the Central Auditory Processing. This indicates the novelty of the proposed theme. Objetivo: Se realizo um relevamiento tecnológico com el objetivo de obtener información sobre la existência de equipos, que valora la umbicación del sonido durante la prueba de Procesamiento Auditivo Central. Metodologia: La búsqueda se realizo sobre la base INPI, Espacenet, Patentscope y Patentinspiration. Se utilizaron los términos “ubicacion”, “sonido”, “auditivo” e “percepción del sonido”, interconectado por los operadores booleanos “AND” e “OR”, para formar vários algoritmos. La investigación se llevô a cabon em los campos de título y resumen, utilizando términos em português en patetes nacionales y en inglês en patentes internacionales. Resultado e Discusión: A la vista de las patentes recuperadas, 3 se consideraron cercanas al tema investigado. Sin embargo, solo uno de ellos sirvió para orientar los parâmetros de la patente em estúdio. Conclusão: Sin embargo, ninguno se refiere al uso del equipo para evaluar la capacidade de localizacion durante la evaluación del Processamiento Auditivo Central. Esto indica novidade del tema propuesto. Objetivo: Foi realizada uma prospecção tecnológica com o objetivo de obter informações sobre a existência de equipamentos que avaliem a localização sonora durante o teste de Processamento Auditivo Central. Metodologia: A busca foi realizada nas bases INPI, Espacenet, Patentscope e Patentinspiration. Foram utilizados os termos “localização”, “som”, “sonora”, “auditiva”, “percepção sonora”, interligados por operadores boleanos “AND” e “OR”, para formar diversos algoritmos. A pesquisa foi realizada nos campos de título e resumo, utilizando termos em português nas patentes nacionais e em inglês nas patentes internacionais. Resultado e Discussão: Diante das patentes recuperadas, foram consideradas três que se aproximaram do tema pesquisado. Contudo, apenas uma delas serviu para nortear os parâmetros da patente em estudo. Conclusão: Nenhuma patente encontrada se refere à utilização do equipamento com objetivo de avaliar a habilidade de localização durante a avaliação do Processamento Auditivo Central. Isso indica o ineditismo do tema proposto.

This paper deals with the question of how specific weather conditions affect the perception of aircraft noise. Auralization is a suitable method by enabling parametrical decompositions of the overall aircraft noise scenario into source and propagation components. Considering influences on the auditory perception, the signal processing chain contains different virtual receivers and post processing using psychoacoustic hearing models. For broad coverage, generic standardized as well as measurement-based atmosphere models with variation of ground impedances such as soil data are evaluated. These variations are given aircraft noise measurement values based on A-weighted sound pressure levels L A and psychoacoustic measures regarding loudness, N, and sharpness, S. The results show an immense influence of weather conditions on A-weighted sound pressure levels and on psychoacoustic perception of aircraft noise, too. The weather-dependent differences of A-weighted sound pressure levels are up to 15 dB A and relative differences regarding loudness of factor 1.6 and sharpness of factor 2.0 occur. The approach can be used to get a better understanding of how the temporal statistics of specific local weather conditions and their perceptual consequences may lead to improved taxation of actual noise events and to an improved basis for long-term averages of aircraft noise effects.

Objectives Loudness dependence of auditory evoked potential (LDAEP) has been proposed as a biological marker for central serotonergic activity in depressive illness. A recent study has suggested that serotonin plays an important role in impulsivity and emotional sensitivity that are prominent clinical manifestations in attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The objective of this study was to examine the association between LDAEP and ADHD symptoms in major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods A total of 60 participants (40 subjects with MDD and 20 healthy controls) aged >18 years who had LDAEPs performed during electroencephalograms were included in this study. ADHD symptoms, depressive, and anxiety symptoms were evaluated. Psychological characteristics and event-related potentials (ERP) were compared among three groups: depression with ADHD symptoms, depression without ADHD symptoms, and healthy controls. Results MDD subjects with ADHD symptoms (N = 20) showed significantly lower LDAEP levels than those without ADHD symptoms (N = 20) and healthy controls (N = 20). LDAEP differences between MDD subjects without ADHD symptoms and healthy controls were not statistically significant. In partial correlation analyses adjusted for age and sex, significant correlations of psychological scales of depression, ADHD symptoms, and LDAEPs were found. Conclusion Results of the present study suggest that LDAEP can reflect adult ADHD symptoms in MDD. Auditory evoked potential appears to be a promising candidate as an evaluation tool for inattention and poor impulse control as well as emotional sensitivity.

Contributions of individual frequency bands to judgments of total loudness can be assessed by varying the level of each band independently from one presentation to the next and determining the relation between the change in level of each band and the loudness judgment. In a previous study, measures of perceptual weight obtained in this way for noise stimuli consisting of 15 bands showed greater weight associated with the highest and lowest bands than loudness models would predict. This was true even for noise with the long-term average speech spectrum, where the highest band contained little energy. One explanation is that listeners were basing decisions on some attribute other than loudness. The current study replicated earlier results for noise stimuli and included conditions using 15 tones located at the center frequencies of the noise bands. Although the two types of stimuli sound very different, the patterns of perceptual weight were nearly identical, suggesting that both sets of results are based on loudness judgments and that the edge bands play an important role in those judgments. The importance of the highest band was confirmed in a loudness-matching task involving all combinations of noise and tonal stimuli.

Cochlear implant users require fitting of electrical threshold and comfort levels for optimal access to sound. In this study, we used single-channel cortical auditory evoked responses (CAEPs) obtained from 20 participants using a Nucleus device. A fully objective method to estimate threshold levels was developed, using growth function fitting and the peak phase-locking value feature. Results demonstrated that growth function fitting is a viable method for estimating threshold levels in cochlear implant users, with a strong correlation (r = 0.979, p

In comodulation masking release (CMR), the auditory signal threshold improves when maskers far from the frequency of the target signal are coherently amplitude-modulated. Studies show that inhibitory function may play a role in CMR. In individuals who have tinnitus, decreasing inhibitory functioning in auditory central nervous system has been documented. Therefore, in this study, the purpose was to evaluate CMR in individuals suffering from tinnitus and compare CMR findings with those who do not have tinnitus. Seventeen normal-hearing individuals (without tinnitus) and 13 individuals having unilateral tonal tinnitus (4000 or 6000 Hz) with normal or near to normal hearing participated in this study. All participants were 20 to 50 years of age and underwent comodulated (CM), unmodulated (UM), and reference (RF) threshold measurements and then the CMRs (CMR and Across Frequency CMR; AF-CMR) were calculated. An ANOVA showed that the CM thresholds were statistically different between groups, while the RF and UM thresholds were not statistically different. CMR (CMR & AF-CMR) function was higher in those without tinnitus compared to unilateral tinnitus sufferers. Due to the inhibitory role of the auditory central nervous system in CMR, it appears that tinnitus and CMR both may be influenced by inhibitory function.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate a more energy-efficient dynamic current focussing (DCF) speech-processing strategy after long-term listening experience. In DCF, tripolar stimulation is used near the threshold and loudness is controlled by the compensation coefficient sigma. A recent acute pilot study showed improved spectral-temporally modulated ripple test (SMRT) scores at low loudness levels, but battery life was reduced to 1.5-4 hours. Design: Within-subject comparisons were made for the clinical versus. DCF strategy after 5 weeks of at-home usage. Speech intelligibility in noise, spectral ripple discrimination, temporal modulation detection, loudness growth, and subjective ratings were assessed. Study sample: Twenty HiRes90K (Advanced Bionics, Valencia, USA) cochlear implant (CI) users. Results: Average battery life was 9 hours with the newly implemented DCF compared to 13.4 hours with the clinical strategy. Compared with measurements made at the beginning of the study, SMRT-scores and speech intelligibility in noise were significantly improved with DCF. However, both measures suffered from unexpected learning effects over time. The improvement disappeared and speech intelligibility in noise declined significantly relative to the final control measurement with the clinical strategy. Conclusion: Most CI users can adapt to the DCF strategy in a take-home setting. Although DCF has the potential to improve performance on the SMRT test, learning effects complicate the interpretation of the current results.

Purpose This article presents a basic exploration of Bayesian inference to inform researchers unfamiliar to this type of analysis of the many advantages this readily available approach provides. Method First, we demonstrate the development of Bayes' theorem, the cornerstone of Bayesian statistics, into an iterative process of updating priors. Working with a few assumptions, including normalcy and conjugacy of prior distribution, we express how one would calculate the posterior distribution using the prior distribution and the likelihood of the parameter. Next, we move to an example in auditory research by considering the effect of sound therapy for reducing the perceived loudness of tinnitus. In this case, as well as most real-world settings, we turn to Markov chain simulations because the assumptions allowing for easy calculations no longer hold. Using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, we can illustrate several analysis solutions given by a straightforward Bayesian approach. Conclusion Bayesian methods are widely applicable and can help scientists overcome analysis problems, including how to include existing information, run interim analysis, achieve consensus through measurement, and, most importantly, interpret results correctly. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.7822592

Purpose This brief research note is motivated by an ever-increasing need for typical repeated-measures loudness judgments and variability estimates of the kind necessary to conduct evidence-based treatment studies and clinical trials. Method These judgments and variability data, originally collected but not reported by Formby, Payne, Yang, Wu, and Parton (2017) , are presented here for relative (categorical) and absolute loudness judgments for typical young adult listeners with normal auditory function. Results As shown in this research note, these data may differ appreciably between young and older adult listeners with audiometric pure-tone thresholds within the clinically normal range. Conclusion In general, these findings highlight the need for good age-based, repeated-measures data for planning and powering evidence-based treatment studies and, specifically, for clinical trials that rely on categorical loudness judgments (i.e., as measured with the Contour Test of loudness; Cox, Alexander, Taylor, & Gray, 1997 ) as primary and secondary outcome measures.

Purpose Chronic tinnitus (“ringing in the ears”) is a phantom auditory perception with no cure. A goal of treatment is often to reduce the loudness of tinnitus. However, tinnitus loudness cannot be measured objectively. It is most commonly assessed by obtaining a loudness match (LM) with a pure tone and by using a numeric rating scale (NRS). Constrained loudness scaling (CLS) is a more recent measure of tinnitus loudness that utilizes auditory training of a fixed loudness scale to guide tinnitus loudness judgments. The purpose of this study was to compare results using these 3 measures of tinnitus loudness. Method This study obtained tinnitus loudness measures of LM, NRS, and CLS with 170 participants. These participants are part of a larger study obtaining repeated measures over 6 months. Only baseline data are presented. Results Correlations between all measures were weak to moderate: LM versus CLS ( r = .46), CLS versus NRS ( r = .49), and LM versus NRS ( r = .38). Conclusion Further systematic research is needed to more fully understand the relationships between these different measures and to establish a valid measure of tinnitus loudness.

To assess the relationship between the loudness of tinnitus and insomnia via a mediation analysis.Retrospective cross-sectional.417 consecutive patients seeking treatment for tinnitus in an Audiology Department in the UK.Mediation analysis showed that the relationship between tinnitus loudness measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and insomnia measured using the insomnia severity index was fully mediated via depression measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire, tinnitus handicap measured using the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and tinnitus annoyance measured using the VAS. The regression coefficients for the indirect effects of tinnitus loudness on insomnia were: via depression b = 0.53 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.35-0.71); via the VAS for tinnitus annoyance, b = 0.33 (95% CI: -0.004-0.66); and via tinnitus handicap, b = 0.38 (95% CI: 0.16-0.6). The coefficient for the total indirect effect was b = 1.23 (95% CI: 0.89-1.58). The coefficient for the direct effect of tinnitus loudness on insomnia was b = 0.11 (95% CI: -0.27-0.51), a non-significant effect.Insomnia is not directly related to tinnitus loudness. Depression, tinnitus handicap and tinnitus annoyance mediate the relationship between tinnitus loudness and insomnia.

Previous studies have reported gender differences in loudness perception. To clarify factors that affect loudness perception of men and women, so that differences in their processing of auditory stimuli might be revealed, we conducted four experiments using innovative experimental approaches. A rating experiment employed a wider range of sound stimuli and a greater number of categories on the verbal interval scale to elicit participants’ ratings of sounds at different sound pressure levels. As in previous studies, male participants tended to rate the same sounds as less loud than did females. An experiment with the method of adjustment measured the limits of sound pressure level perceived as soft or as loud, and replicated the gender effect: female participants selected lower levels than did males to represent both soft and loud sound categories. The final two experiments sought to measure perceived loudness on a (numeric) ratio scale rather than a (verbal) interval scale. Using the methods of magnitude estimation and magnitude production, these experiments did not produce the clear gender differences seen in the first two experiments. Differences in loudness judgments between males and females may actually reflect differences in the use of verbal expression rather than differences in perception of intensity.

Noise-induced annoyance is one person’s individual adverse reaction to noise. Noise annoyance is an important basis for determining the acceptability of environmental noise exposure and for formulating environmental noise standards. It is influenced by both acoustic and non-acoustic factors. To identify non-acoustic factors significantly influencing noise annoyance, 40 noise samples with a loudness level of 60–90 phon from 500–1000 kV substations were selected in this study. A total of 246 subjects were recruited randomly. Using the assessment scale of noise annoyance specified by ISO 15666-2021, listening tests were conducted. Meanwhile, basic information and noise sensitivity of each subject were obtained through a questionnaire and the Weinstein’s noise sensitivity scale. Based on the five non-acoustic indices which were identified in this study and had a significant influence on noise annoyance, a prediction model of annoyance from substation noise was proposed by a stepwise regression. Results showed that the influence weight of acoustic indices in the model accounted for 80% in which the equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure level and the sound pressure level above 1/1 octave band of 125 Hz were 65% and 15%, respectively. The influence weight of non-acoustic indices entering the model was 20% in which age, education level, noise sensitivity, income, and noisy degree in the workplace were 8%, 2%, 4%, 4%, and 2%, respectively. The result of this study can provide a basis for factors identification and prediction of noise annoyance.

Objective Although serotonergic dysfunction is significantly associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) and schizophrenia (SCZ), comparison of serotonergic dysfunction in both diseases has received little attention. Serotonin hypotheses have suggested diminished and elevated serotonin activity in MDD and SCZ, respectively. However, the foundations underlying these hypotheses are unclear regarding changes in serotonin neurotransmission in the aging brain. The loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials (LDAEP) reflects serotonin neurotransmission. The present study compared the LDAEP between patients with SCZ or MDD and healthy controls (HCs). We further examined whether age was correlated with the LDAEP and clinical symptoms. Methods This prospective clinical study included 105 patients with SCZ (n = 54) or MDD (n = 51). Additionally, 35 HCs were recruited for this study. The LDAEP was measured on the midline channels via 62 electroencephalography channels. Results Patients with SCZ or MDD showed a significantly smaller mean LDAEP than those in HCs. The LDAEP was positively correlated with age in patients with SCZ or MDD. Conclusions Changes in central serotonergic activity could be indicated by evaluating the LDAEP in patients with SCZ or MDD. Age-related reductions in serotonergic activity may be screened using the LDAEP in patients with SCZ or MDD.

As hearing aid outcome measures move from retrospective to momentary assessments, it is important to understand how contextual factors influence subjective ratings. Under laboratory-controlled conditions, we examined whether subjective ratings changed as a function of acoustics, response timing, and task variables.Eighteen adults (age 21 to 85 years; M = 51.4) with sensorineural hearing loss were fitted with hearing aids. Sentences in noise were presented at 3 overall levels (50, 65, and 80 dB SPL) and 3 signal to noise ratios (0, +5, and +10 dB signal to noise ratio [SNR]). Listeners rated three sound quality dimensions (intelligibility, noisiness, and loudness) under four experimental conditions that manipulated timing and task focus.The quality ratings changed as the acoustics changed: intelligibility ratings increased with input level (p0.05); noisiness ratings increased at poorer SNRs (p0.05); and loudness ratings increased as input level increased (p0.05). Timing of rating was significant at the highest presentation level (80 dB SPL): Participants gave higher noise ratings while listening to the signal than afterward (p0.05). Presence of a secondary task had no significant effect on ratings (p0.1).The findings of this laboratory study provide evidence to support the conclusion that group-mean listener ratings of loudness, noisiness, and intelligibility change in predictable ways as level and SNR of the speech in noise stimulus are altered. They also provide weak evidence to support the conclusion that timing of the ratings (during or immediately after sound exposure) can affect noisiness ratings under certain conditions, but no evidence to support the conclusion that timing affects other quality ratings. There is also no evidence to support the conclusion that quality ratings are influenced by the presence of, or focus on, a secondary nonauditory task of the type used here.

Purpose The purposes of this study are to introduce the concept of vocal priorities based on acoustic correlates, to develop an instrument to determine these vocal priorities, and to analyze the pattern of vocal priorities in patients with voice disorders. Method Questions probing the importance of 5 vocal attributes (vocal clarity, loudness, mean speaking pitch, pitch range, vocal endurance) were generated from consensus conference involving speech-language pathologists, laryngologists, and voice scientists, as well as patient feedback. The responses to the preliminary items from 213 subjects were subjected to exploratory factor analysis, which confirmed 4 of the predefined domains. The final instrument consisted of a 16-item Vocal Priority Questionnaire probing the relative importance of clarity, loudness, mean speaking pitch, and pitch range. Results The Vocal Priority Questionnaire had high reliability (Cronbach's α = .824) and good construct validity. A majority of the cohort (61%) ranked vocal clarity as their highest vocal priority, and 20%, 12%, and 7% ranked loudness, mean speaking pitch, and pitch range, respectively, as their highest priority. The frequencies of the highest ranked priorities did not differ by voice diagnosis or by sex. Considerable individual variation in vocal priorities existed within these large trends. Conclusions A patient's vocal priorities can be identified and taken into consideration in planning behavioral or surgical intervention for a voice disorder. Inclusion of vocal priorities in treatment planning empowers the patient in shared decision making, helps the clinician tailor treatment, and may also improve therapy compliance.

We propose that perceptions of auditory loudness and interpersonal closeness are bidirectionally related. Across 12 experiments (total N = 2,219; 10 preregistered; with Singaporean, British, U.S. American, and Australian participants), we demonstrated that louder audio made people feel physically (Study 1a) and socially (Study 1b) closer to others, presumably because loudness activates interpersonal closeness-related concepts implicitly (Studies 1c and 1d). This loudness–interpersonal closeness effect was observed across diverse samples (Studies 2a, 3a, and S1), for longer listening intervals (Study 2b), and in natural settings (Studies 3a and 3b). Conversely, individuals made to feel socially excluded rated their surroundings as quieter (Study 4). Furthermore, following social exclusion, individuals showed a preference for louder volume (Study 5). Finally, exposure to loud stimuli mitigated detrimental psychological effects of social exclusion (Study 6). Theoretical implications for the social cognition of loudness, social exclusion and compensatory strategies, and practical implications for ameliorating loneliness are discussed.

Loudness judgments of sounds varying in level across time show a non-uniform temporal weighting, with increased weights assigned to the beginning of the sound (primacy effect). In addition, higher weights are observed for temporal components that are higher in level than the remaining components (loudness dominance). In three experiments, sounds consisting of 100- or 475-ms Gaussian wideband noise segments with random level variations were presented and either none, the first, or a central temporal segment was amplified or attenuated. In Experiment 1, the sounds consisted of four 100-ms segments that were separated by 500-ms gaps. Previous experiments did not show a primacy effect in such a condition. In Experiment 2, four- or ten-100-ms-segment sounds without gaps between the segments were presented to examine the interaction between the primacy effect and level dominance. As expected, for the sounds with segments separated by gaps, no primacy effect was observed, but weights on amplified segments were increased and weights on attenuated segments were decreased. For the sounds with contiguous segments, a primacy effect as well as effects of relative level (similar to those in Experiment 1) were found. For attenuation, the data indicated no substantial interaction between the primacy effect and loudness dominance, whereas for amplification an interaction was present. In Experiment 3, sounds consisting of either four contiguous 100-ms or 475-ms segments, or four 100-ms segments separated by 500-ms gaps were presented. Effects of relative level were more pronounced for the contiguous sounds. Across all three experiments, the effects of relative level were more pronounced for attenuation. In addition, the effects of relative level showed a dependence on the position of the change in level, with opposite direction for attenuation compared to amplification. Some of the results are in accordance with explanations based on masking effects on auditory intensity resolution.

Loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials (LDAEP) has been proposed as a biological marker of central serotonergic activity related to suicides. This study’s objective was to analyze the difference in LDAEP between depressed patients with suicide attempts (SA) and suicidal ideation (SI). It included 130 participants (45 depressed patients with SA, 49 depressed patients with SI, and 36 healthy controls) aged > 18 years who exhibited LDAEP during electroencephalography. Psychological characteristics and event-related potentials of the three groups were compared. There was no significant difference in LDAEP between major depressive disorder (MDD) patients with SA and SI (p = 0.59). MDD patients with SI, who attempted suicide had significantly lower LDAEP than healthy controls (p = 0.01 and p = 0.01, respectively). However, the significance disappeared when psychological characteristics were controlled. Our results suggest that LDAEP might not be possible biomarkers for suicidal behaviors in patients with MDD. Further studies to assess the biological basis of suicide and identify the underlying dimensions that mediate the relationship between the biological basis and suicidal behaviors will be needed.

Central fatigue in Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a common and disabling symptom that further worsens the patients’ quality of life. A deficit in the serotonergic system may be implicated in the occurrence of fatigue in patients with PD as well as in those with other chronic conditions characterized by fatigue. The loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials (LDAEP) is a neurophysiological tool that has proved to be effective in measuring the serotonergic central function in vivo. The aim of the present study was to assess central serotonergic activity in PD patients and to explore its possible association with the presence of fatigue. LDAEP was recorded in 38 PD patients (26 without fatigue – PDnF and 12 with fatigue – PDF) and 34 healthy controls. A significant difference between parkinsonian patients and controls emerged, with patients displaying stronger LDAEP values (which reflect a lower serotonergic central tone) than controls. By contrast, no differences in LDAEP emerged between PDF and PDnF. Our electrophysiological data confirmed the presence of a deficit in serotonergic central transmission in PD. An association between this deficit and fatigue was not demonstrated. It is likely that an altered dopamine/serotonin balance, rather than a serotonin deficit alone, is involved in the genesis of central fatigue. This complex and multifaceted symptom is related above all to a dysfunction in the striato-thalamo-cortical loop that connects the neostriatum to the frontal lobe and is strongly affected by motivation.

Direct drive hearing devices, which deliver a signal directly to the middle ear by vibrating the tympanic membrane via a lens placed in contact with the umbo, are designed to provide an extension of audible bandwidth, but there are few studies of the effects of these devices on preference, speech intelligibility, and loudness. The current study is the first to compare aided speech understanding between narrow and extended bandwidth conditions for listeners with hearing loss while fitted with a direct drive hearing aid system. The study also explored the effect of bandwidth on loudness perception and investigated subjective preference for bandwidth. Fifteen adult hearing aid users with symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss participated in a prospective, within-subjects, randomized single-blind repeated-measures study. Participants wore the direct drive hearing aids for 4 to 15 weeks (average 6 weeks) prior to outcome measurement. Outcome measures were completed in various bandwidth conditions achieved by reducing the gain of the device above 5000 Hz or by filtering the stimuli. Aided detection thresholds provided evidence of amplification to 10000 Hz. A significant improvement was found in high-frequency consonant detection and recognition, as well as for speech in noise performance in the full versus narrow bandwidth conditions. Subjective loudness ratings increased with provision of the full bandwidth available; however, real-world trials showed most participants were able to wear the full bandwidth hearing aids with only small adjustments to the prescription method. The majority of participants had either no preference or a preference for the full bandwidth setting.

International audience; Understanding the individual listening performance of hearing-impaired listeners is crucial for improving auditory rehabilitation strategies and for user satisfaction. Here, speech recognition of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners for well controlled laboratory conditions as well as for realistic auditory scenes are considered. For hearing-impaired listeners two hearing aid prescription rules are compared: NAL-NL2, which is commonly used in commercial hearing devices, and trueLOUDNESS (Oetting et al., 2018). While NAL-NL2 fitting is based on the pure tone threshold, the trueLOUDNESS uses loudness measurements for gain determination. The prescription rules are compared in terms of speech recognition and loudness perception. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured in four noise conditions: stationary, speech-shaped noise, modulated ICRA5-250 noise, and two realistic scenes, nature, and cafeteria (Grimm et al., 2016). Loudness ratings were determined for both scenes and real-world test signals to investigate the loudness perception. Hearing aid fitting was provided via the Master Hearing Aid (Grimm et al., 2006). The realistic auditory scenes were implemented in TASCAR (Grimm et al., 2019). trueLOUDNESS provided better SRTs than NAL-NL2 for low levels of background noise. At higher levels of 75 dB comparable results were observed. In all aided conditions, the hearing-impaired listeners performed worse than normal-hearing listeners. The SRT benefits in the standard laboratory conditions (stationary and modulated noise) correlated well with the SRTs in realistic scenes but only for a low level of background noise. Binaural loudness perception for broadband signals was close-to-normal with trueLOUDNESS lowe-than-normal with NAL-NL2. In order to better understand the contribution of hearing threshold and suprathreshold deficits on speech recognition, the predictions of a binaural speech intelligibility model will be presented as well.

The sources and consequences of a sensorineural hearing loss are diverse. While several approaches have aimed at disentangling the physiological and perceptual consequences of different etiologies, hearing deficit characterization and rehabilitation have been dominated by the results from pure-tone audiometry. Here, we present a novel approach based on data-driven profiling of perceptual auditory deficits that attempts to represent auditory phenomena that are usually hidden by, or entangled with, audibility loss. We hypothesize that the hearing deficits of a given listener, both at hearing threshold and at supra-threshold sound levels, result from two independent types of “auditory distortions”. In this two-dimensional space, four distinct “auditory profiles” can be identified. To test this hypothesis we gathered a dataset consisting of a heterogeneous group of listeners that were evaluated using measures of speech intelligibility, loudness perception, binaural processing abilities and spectro-temporal resolution. The subsequent analysis revealed that distortion type-I was associated with elevated hearing thresholds at high frequencies and reduced temporal masking release and was significantly correlated with elevated speech reception thresholds in noise. Distortion type-II was associated with low-frequency hearing loss and abnormally steep loudness functions. The auditory profiles represent four robust subpopulations of hearing-impaired listeners that exhibit different degrees of perceptual distortions. The four auditory profiles may provide a valuable basis for improved hearing rehabilitation, e.g. through profile-based hearing-aid fitting

PurposeThe aim of the study was to investigate the achieved audibility with clinically available, modern, high-end, behind-the-ear hearing aids fitted using the Desired Sensation Level v5.0 child prescription for a clinical sample of children with hearing impairment and the effect of the extended bandwidth provided by the hearing aids on several outcome measures.MethodThe achieved audibility was measured using the maximum audible output frequency method. Twenty-eight children (7–17 years old) with mild to severe hearing losses completed this study. Two hearing aid conditions were fitted for each participant: an extended bandwidth condition, which was fitted to targets as closely as possible, and a restricted bandwidth condition, for which aided output was restricted above 4.5 kHz. Consonant discrimination in noise, subjective preference, aided loudness growth, and preferred listening levels were evaluated in both conditions.ResultsThe extended bandwidth hearing aid fittings provided speech audibility above 4.5 kHz for all children, with an average maximum audible output frequency of 7376 Hz (SD= 1669 Hz). When compared to a restricted bandwidth, the extended bandwidth condition led to an improvement of 5.4% for consonant discrimination in noise scores, mostly attributable to /s/, /z/, and /t/ phoneme perception. Aided loudness results and preferred listening levels were not significantly different across bandwidth conditions; however, 65% of the children indicated a subjective preference for the extended bandwidth.ConclusionThe study suggests that providing the full bandwidth available, with modern, behind-the-ear hearing aids, leads to improved audibility, when compared to restricted bandwidth hearing aids, and that it leads to beneficial outcomes for children who use hearing aids, fitted to the Desired Sensation Level v5.0 child prescription, without causing significant increases in their loudness perception.

Categorical loudness scaling (CLS) measures provide useful information about an individual's loudness perception across the dynamic range of hearing. A probability model of CLS categories has previously been described as a multi-category psychometric function (MCPF). In the study, a representative "catalog" of potential listener MCPFs was used in conjunction with maximum-likelihood estimation to derive CLS functions for participants with normal hearing and with hearing loss. The approach of estimating MCPFs for each listener has the potential to improve the accuracy of the CLS measurements, particularly when a relatively low number of data points are available. The present study extends the MCPF approach by using Bayesian inference to select stimulus parameters that are predicted to yield maximum expected information (MEI) during data collection. The accuracy and reliability of the MCPF-MEI approach were compared to the standardized CLS measurement procedure (ISO 16832:2006, 2006). A non-adaptive, fixed-level, paradigm served as a "gold-standard" for this comparison. The test time required to obtain measurements in the standard procedure is a major barrier to its clinical uptake. Test time was reduced from approximately 15 min to approximately 3 min with the MEI-adaptive procedure. Results indicated that the test-retest reliability and accuracy of the MCPF-MEI adaptive procedures were similar to the standardized CLS procedure. Computer simulations suggest that the reliability and accuracy of the MEI procedure were limited by intrinsic uncertainty of the listeners represented in the MCPF catalog. In other words, the MCPF provided insufficient predictive power to significantly improve adaptive-tracking efficiency under practical conditions. Concurrent optimization of both the MCPF catalog and the MEI-adaptive procedure have the potential to produce better results. Regardless of the adaptive-tracking method used in the CLS procedure, the MCPF catalog remains clinically useful for enabling maximum-likelihood determination of loudness categories.

Objective: Current hearing aid prescription rules assume that spectral loudness summation decreases with hearing impairment and that binaural loudness summation is independent of hearing loss and signal bandwidth. Previous studies have shown that these assumptions might be incorrect. Spectral loudness summation was measured and compared for loudness scaling and loudness matching. Design: In this study, the effect of bandwidth on binaural summation was investigated by comparing loudness perception of low-pass filtered, high-pass filtered, and broadband pink noise at 35 Categorical Units for both unilateral and bilateral presentation. Study sample: Sixteen hearing-impaired listeners. Results: The results show that loudness differences between the three signals are different for bilateral presentation than for unilateral presentation. In specific, binaural loudness summation is larger for the low-pass filtered pink noise than for the high-pass filtered pink noise. Finally, individual variability in loudness perception near loudness discomfort level was found to be very large. Conclusions: Loudness matching is offered as a fast and reliable method to measure individual loudness perception. As discomfort with loud sounds is one of the major problems encountered by hearing aid users, measurement of individual loudness perception could improve hearing aid fitting substantially.

Many environmental sounds contain significant energy in the infrasonic and low-frequency (ISLF) ranges that have been associated with cases of annoyance and noise complaints. This study assessed the effect of sound duration on audibility and loudness of ISLF sounds. A first experiment evaluated detection thresholds for tones of 4, 16, and 32 Hz with durations up to 4000 ms. Furthermore, equal-loudness-level contours (ELCs) were obtained as function of duration up to 2000 ms. Tones of 1000 Hz were also included here. Results displayed the known pattern of general sound level decrease with increasing duration up to several hundred milliseconds. ELCs stabilized slightly earlier than thresholds, but after 1000 ms, levels remained roughly constant for both measures except for 4-Hz tones, where the decrease continued up to the longest durations tested. As 4-Hz cycles are perceptually resolved as separate pressure pulses, the authors hypothesized their duration dependence would resemble that of pulse trains. Hence, a second experiment evaluated pulse-train thresholds (1000-Hz carrier) for durations up to 4000 ms. For both pulse repetition rates of 4 and 32 Hz, threshold stabilized after 1000 ms as for tones ≥16 Hz, suggesting the continuing threshold decrease for a 4-Hz tone is specific to infrasound.

The “time-varying loudness” (TVL) model of Glasberg and Moore calculates “instantaneous loudness” every 1 ms, and this is used to generate predictions of short-term loudness, the loudness of a short segment of sound, such as a word in a sentence, and of long-term loudness, the loudness of a longer segment of sound, such as a whole sentence. The calculation of instantaneous loudness is computationally intensive and real-time implementation of the TVL model is difficult. To speed up the computation, a deep neural network (DNN) was trained to predict instantaneous loudness using a large database of speech sounds and artificial sounds (tones alone and tones in white or pink noise), with the predictions of the TVL model as a reference (providing the “correct” answer, specifically the loudness level in phons). A multilayer perceptron with three hidden layers was found to be sufficient, with more complex DNN architecture not yielding higher accuracy. After training, the deviations between the predictions of the TVL model and the predictions of the DNN were typically less than 0.5 phons, even for types of sounds that were not used for training (music, rain, animal sounds, and washing machine). The DNN calculates instantaneous loudness over 100 times more quickly than the TVL model. Possible applications of the DNN are discussed.

Trainable hearing aids let users fine-tune their hearing aid settings in their own listening environment: Based on consistent user-adjustments and information about the acoustic environment, the trainable aids will change environment-specific settings to the user’s preference. A requirement for effective fine-tuning is consistency of preference for similar settings in similar environments. The aim of this study was to evaluate consistency of preference for settings differing in intensity, gain-frequency slope, and directionality when listening in simulated real-world environments and to determine if participants with more consistent preferences could be identified based on profile measures. A total of 52 adults (63–88 years) with hearing varying from normal to a moderate sensorineural hearing loss selected their preferred setting from pairs differing in intensity (3 or 6 dB), gain-frequency slope (±1.3 or ± 2.7 dB/octave), or directionality (omnidirectional vs. cardioid) in four simulated real-world environments: traffic noise, a monologue in traffic noise at 5 dB signal-to-noise ratio, and a dialogue in café noise at 5 and at 0 dB signal-to-noise ratio. Forced-choice comparisons were made 10 times for each combination of pairs of settings and environment. Participants also completed nine psychoacoustic, cognitive, and personality measures. Consistency of preference, defined by a setting preferred at least 9 out of 10 times, varied across participants. More participants obtained consistent preferences for larger differences between settings and less difficult environments. The profile measures did not predict consistency of preference. Trainable aid users could benefit from counselling to ensure realistic expectations for particular adjustments and listening situations.

Motor executions alter sensory processes. Studies have shown that loudness perception changes when a sound is generated by active movement. However, it is still unknown where and how the motor-related changes in loudness perception depend on the task demand of motor execution. We examined whether different levels of precision demands in motor control affects loudness perception. We carried out a loudness discrimination test, in which the sound stimulus was produced in conjunction with the force generation task. We tested three target force amplitude levels. The force target was presented on a monitor as a fixed visual target. The generated force was also presented on the same monitor as a movement of the visual cursor. Participants adjusted their force amplitude in a predetermined range without overshooting using these visual targets and moving cursor. In the control condition, the sound and visual stimuli were generated externally (without a force generation task). We found that the discrimination performance was significantly improved when the sound was produced by the force generation task compared to the control condition, in which the sound was produced externally, although we did not find that this improvement in discrimination performance changed depending on the different target force amplitude levels. The results suggest that the demand for precise control to produce a fixed amount of force may be key to obtaining the facilitatory effect of motor execution in auditory processes.

Previous studies have demonstrated that auditory reaction time (RT) is a reliable surrogate of loudness perception in humans. Reaction time-intensity (RT-I) functions faithfully recapitulate equal loudness contours in humans while being easier to obtain than equal loudness judgments, especially in animals. In humans, loudness estimation not only depends on sound intensity, but on a variety of other acoustic factors. Stimulus duration and bandwidth are known to impact loudness perception. In addition, the presence of background noise mimics loudness recruitment; loudness growth is rapid near threshold, but growth becomes normal at suprathreshold levels. Therefore, to evaluate whether RT-I functions are a reliable measure of loudness growth in rats, we obtained auditory RTs across a range of stimulus intensities, durations, and bandwidths, in both quiet and in the presence of background/masking noise. We found that reaction time patterns across stimulus parameters were repeatable over several months in rats and generally consistent with human loudness perceptual data. Our results provide important building blocks for future animal model studies of loudness perception and loudness perceptual disorders.

Cochlear Implant (CI) sound coding strategies based on simultaneous stimulation lead to an increased loudness percept when compared to sequential stimulation using the same current levels. This is due to loudness summation as a result of channel interactions. Studying the loudness perception evoked by dual-channels compared to single-channels can be useful to optimize sound coding strategies that use simultaneous current pulses. Fourteen users of HiRes90k implants and one user of a CII implant loudness balanced single-channel to dual-channel stimuli with varying distance between simultaneous channels. In this study each component of a dual channel was a virtual channel, which shared current across two adjacent electrodes. Balancing was performed at threshold and comfortable level, for two spatial references (apical and basal) and for dual-channels with different relative current ratios. Increasing distance between dual-channels decreased the amount of current compensation in the dual-channel required to reach equal loudness to a single channel component by an average of 0.24 dB / mm without a significant difference between threshold and most comfortable level. If the components of the dual-channels were not at equal loudness, the loudness summation was reduced with respect to the equal loudness case. The results were incorporated into an existing loudness model by McKay et al. (2003). The predictions from the adapted model were evaluated by comparing the loudness evoked by simultaneous and sequential sound coding strategies. The application of the adapted model resulted in a deviation between predicted and actual behavioral loudness balancing adjustments in electrical level between simultaneous and sequential processing strategies of 0.24 dB on average.

Background: Vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) are present in almost everyone. The proximity of the cochlear and vestibular end organs strongly indicates an overlap of the stimuli to which they respond.Aims/objectives: To determine the loudness of shouting compared to the external auditory canal (EAC) and explore how hyperstimulation of the cochlea and vestibular structures might be prevented.Materials and methods: We compared the loudness and frequency response of sound during shouting, biting and chewing, as well as the measurement of the loudness and frequency of sound in the external auditory canal (EAC) when a calibrated minishaker is applied to the forehead and to the upper incisor teeth.Results: We showed that vibratory sounds produced by vocalizations and oral activities were attenuated when they reached the ear, so that these sounds would not act as vestibular stimulants.Conclusions and significance: Chewing is known to cause a stapedius reflex which suppresses internal sounds to optimize audition of external sounds, while at the same time suppressing vestibular stimulation, which serves to optimize the sensitivity of the vestibular system, in order that it may respond precisely to a threat.

The goal of the present study was to compare forward masking patterns by stimulation of low and high rates in cochlear implant users. Postlingually deafened Cochlear Nucleus® device users participated in the study. In experiment 1, two maskers of different rates (250 and 1000 pulses per second) were set at levels that produced equal masking for a probe presented at the same electrode as the maskers. This aligned the two masking functions at the on-site probe location. Then their forward masking patterns for the far probes were compared. Results showed that slope of the masked probe-threshold decay as a function of probe-masker separation was steeper for the high-rate than the low-rate masker. A linear model indicated that this difference in spread of neural excitation (SOE) was accounted for by two factors that were not correlated with each other. One factor that accounted for the difference in SOE was that the low-rate masker required a considerably higher current level to be equally effective in masking as the high-rate masker. The second factor was the effect of stimulation rate on loudness, i.e., integration of multiple pulses. This was consistent with our hypothesis that if an increase in stimulation rate does not result in an increased total neural response, then it is unlikely that the change in rate would change spatial distribution of the neural activity. Interestingly, the difference in masking effectiveness of the maskers predicted subjects’ speech recognition. Poorer performers were those who showed more comparable masking effects by maskers of different rates. The difference in the masking effectiveness may indirectly measure auditory neuron’s excitability, which predicts speech recognition. In experiment 2, SOE of the high-rate and low-rate maskers were compared at a level that is clinically relevant, i.e., equal loudness. At equal loudness, high-rate stimulation not only produced an overall greater amount of forward masking, but also a shallower decay of masking with probe-masker separation (wider SOE), relative to low-rate stimulation. The difference in SOE was the opposite to the findings from experiment 1. Whether the maskers were calibrated for equal masking or loudness, the absolute current level was always higher for the low-rate masker, which suggests that the SOE patterns cannot be explained by current spread alone. The fact that high-rate stimulation produced greater masking and wider SOE at equal loudness may explain why using high stimulation rates has not produced consistent benefits for speech recognition, and why lowering stimulation rate from the manufacturer’s default sometimes results in improved speech recognition for subjects.

Hyperacusis is a debilitating hearing condition in which normal everyday sounds are perceived as exceedingly loud, annoying, aversive or even painful. The prevalence of hyperacusis approaches 10%, making it an important, but understudied medical condition. To noninvasively identify the neural correlates of hyperacusis in an animal model, we used sound-evoked functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to locate regions of abnormal activity in the central nervous system of rats with behavioral evidence of hyperacusis induced with an ototoxic drug (sodium salicylate, 250 mg/kg, i.p.). Reaction time-intensity measures of loudness-growth revealed behavioral evidence of salicylate-induced hyperacusis at high intensities. fMRI revealed significantly enhanced sound-evoked responses in the auditory cortex (AC) to 80 dB SPL tone bursts presented at 8 and 16 kHz. Sound-evoked responses in the inferior colliculus (IC) were also enhanced, but to a lesser extent. To confirm the main results, electrophysiological recordings of spike discharges from multi-unit clusters were obtained from the central auditory pathway. Salicylate significantly enhanced tone-evoked spike-discharges from multi-unit clusters in the AC from 4 to 30 kHz at intensities ≥60 dB SPL; less enhancement occurred in the medial geniculate body (MGB), and even less in the IC. Our results demonstrate for the first time that non-invasive sound-evoked fMRI can be used to identify regions of neural hyperactivity throughout the brain in an animal model of hyperacusis.

This paper investigates multidimensional characteristics of tonal noise from heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems, besides loudness and tonality, to improve prediction of annoyance. Two studies were conducted: multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis to determine what other perceptual signal characteristics are important and perceptual weight analysis (PWA) to understand the impact of multiple tones in a signal. In the MDS study, paired comparison tasks were conducted to gather similarity and annoyance data. Results show that the latent perceptual dimensions are related to the signal's tonality, loudness, sharpness, and roughness. Including metrics for these perceptions, except roughness, improves the performance of earlier annoyance prediction models. Including both sharpness and tonal audibility does not further improve prediction performance, though. In the PWA study, noise stimuli with five-tone complexes between 125 Hz and 2 kHz were generated for subjective testing to obtain a perceptual weighting function. The levels of each tone were randomly adjusted for every trial, and both harmonic and inharmonic tone complexes were utilized. The PWA result was applied as a spectral weighting function to calculate a proposed weighted-sum tonal audibility metric. Utilizing the proposed metric instead of the traditional tonal audibility metric improves annoyance prediction to a similar degree as including sharpness.

Whenever we move, speak, or play musical instruments, our actions generate auditory sensory input. The sensory consequences of our actions are thought to be predicted via sensorimotor integration, which involves anatomical and functional links between auditory and motor brain regions. The physiological connections are relatively well established, but less is known about how sensorimotor integration affects auditory perception. The sensory attenuation hypothesis suggests that the perceived loudness of self-generated sounds is attenuated to help distinguish self-generated sounds from ambient sounds. Sensory attenuation would work for louder ambient sounds, but could lead to less accurate perception if the ambient sounds were quieter. We hypothesize that a key function of sensorimotor integration is the facilitated processing of self-generated sounds, leading to more accurate perception under most conditions. The sensory attenuation hypothesis predicts better performance for higher but not lower intensity comparisons, whereas sensory facilitation predicts improved perception regardless of comparison sound intensity. A series of experiments tested these hypotheses, with results supporting the enhancement hypothesis. Overall, people were more accurate at comparing the loudness of two sounds when making one of the sounds themselves. We propose that the brain selectively modulates the perception of self-generated sounds to enhance representations of action consequences.

Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a brain imaging technique particularly suitable for hearing studies. However, the nature of fNIRS responses to auditory stimuli presented at different stimulus intensities is not well understood. In this study, we investigated whether fNIRS response amplitude was better predicted by stimulus properties (intensity) or individually perceived attributes (loudness).Twenty-two young adults were included in this experimental study. Four different stimulus intensities of a broadband noise were used as stimuli. First, loudness estimates for each stimulus intensity were measured for each participant. Then, the 4 stimulation intensities were presented in counterbalanced order while recording hemoglobin saturation changes from cortical auditory brain areas. The fNIRS response was analyzed in a general linear model design, using 3 different regressors: a non-modulated, an intensity-modulated, and a loudness-modulated regressor.Higher intensity stimuli resulted in higher amplitude fNIRS responses. The relationship between stimulus intensity and fNIRS response amplitude was better explained using a regressor based on individually estimated loudness estimates compared with a regressor modulated by stimulus intensity alone.Brain activation in response to different stimulus intensities is more reliant upon individual loudness sensation than physical stimulus properties. Therefore, in measurements using different auditory stimulus intensities or subjective hearing parameters, loudness estimates should be examined when interpreting results.

OBJECTIVES The human auditory nerve can be electrically stimulated by cochlear implants (CIs) with pulse trains consisting of biphasic pulses with small interphase gaps (IPGs). In animal experiments, lower electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds in implanted animals were found for increasing IPGs (2.1, 10, 20, 30 μs). ECAP thresholds may correlate with loudness thresholds. Therefore, in this study, the IPG effect on loudness and dynamic range was investigated in nine CI subjects. DESIGN A loudness-matching procedure was designed with three different IPGs (2.1, 10, 30 μs) at three different pulse rates (200, 600, 1000 pps). An adaptive loudness-balancing test was performed at the 50% stimulus amplitude level of the dynamic range and most comfortable loudness level (MCL). RESULTS Increasing the IPG or increasing the pulse rate led to a significant decrease in stimulus amplitude for 50% level and MCL in the adaptive test. Because the stimulus amplitudes for 50% level and MCL decreased in a different manner, the calculated upper dynamic range between MCL and 50% level significantly decreased for increasing IPG between 0.24 and 0.38 dB. This decrease in the upper dynamic range was observed for all pulse rates. CONCLUSIONS It is possible to reduce the stimulus amplitude level for the same loudness impression using larger IPGs in CIs; however, larger IPGs decrease the dynamic range. These findings could help during the fitting process of CIs to find the balance between saving battery and a proper dynamic range.

This study investigated the developmental paths in the use of audiovisual information for the perception of emotions and phonemes by Japanese speakers. Children aged 5 to 12 years and adults aged 30 to 39 years engaged in an emotion perception task in which speakers expressed their emotions through their faces and voices, and a phoneme perception task using phonemic information in speakers' lip movements and speech sounds. Results indicated that Japanese children's judgement of emotions by using auditory information increased with increasing age, whereas the use of audiovisual information for judging phonemes remained constant with increasing age. Moreover, adults were affected by visual information more than children. We discuss whether these differences in developmental patterns are due to differential integration processes for information indicative of emotions and phonemes, as well as possible cultural / linguistic reasons for these differences.

Objective This investigation addresses the loudness variations in sones achievable with spectral slope variations (higher harmonic energy) in human vocalization and compares it to the sound pressure level (SPL) variations typically reported in the voice range profile (VRP). Method The primary methodology was computational. The ISO standard 226 was used to convert SPL values to sones for a 125- to 1000-Hz range of fundamental frequency and a –3 dB/octave to –12 dB/octave range of spectral slope. In addition, a retrospective analysis of human subjects' VRPs was conducted, and the experimental results were compared to the theoretical results. Results A very small range of SPL variation (less than 5 dB) in the VRP can produce a large range of loudness. The sensitivity can be on the order of 4 sones per dB SPL change. Conclusion For vocalization in the modal register, loudness variation is not well described by SPL change in dB, especially at high fundamental frequencies where the SPL range in the VRP becomes very small but sizeable loudness variations are still possible.

Human loudness judgments of time-varying sounds show a non-uniform temporal weighting pattern with increased weights at the beginning of a sound. Four experiments were conducted to investigate whether this primacy effect reoccurs after a silent gap of an appropriate duration that is inserted into a level-fluctuating sound. In three of the experiments, contiguous sounds as well as sounds containing silent gaps of different durations were presented. The temporal loudness weights were compared between the sounds that contained a gap and the sounds without a gap. The data showed that with increasing gap duration an increasingly pronounced primacy effect reoccurred on the second sound part in the sense that a) the weights assigned to the first segments after the gap were increased compared to the conditions without a gap, and that b) the following weights again showed a decrease over time. This effect was statistically significant for gap durations of 350 ms and above. To investigate whether an attenuation in level can lead to the same results as a silent gap, segments in the middle part of a sound were attenuated in the fourth experiment, and the resulting weights were compared to conditions in which the middle segments were unattenuated or where a 700 ms silent gap was presented instead of the middle segments. An attenuation of 15 dB resulted in a significant reoccurrence of the primacy effect, although the effect was more pronounced for an attenuation of 30 dB and the silent gap. The results are discussed in the light of auditory nerve responses, masking effects on intensity resolution, and assumptions based on evidence integration processes.

Loudness context effects comprise differences in judgments of the loudness of a target stimulus depending on the presence of a preceding inducer tone. Interstimulus intervals (ISIs) between inducer tone and target tone of about 200 ms and above cause an induced loudness reduction (ILR) of the target tone. As the ILR increases, respectively, the perceived loudness of the target stimuli decreases with increasing ISI. This in turn means that identical stimuli in a different context have a differently perceived loudness. A correlation between specific characteristics in the electroencephalography responses and perceived loudness in an ILR experiment would therefore provide a neurophysiological indication of loudness processing beyond a neural representation of stimulus intensity only. To examine if such a correlation exists, we investigated cortical electroencephalography responses in a latency range from 75 to 510 ms during a psychoacoustical ILR experiment with different ISIs. With increasing ISI, the strength of the N1-P2 deflection of the respective electroencephalography response decreases similarly to the loudness perception of the target tone pulse. This indicates a representation based on loudness rather than on intensity at the corresponding processing stage.