101. The CT derived angle between the transseptal puncture site and the left atrial appendage as a predictor for complex interventional occlusion procedures.
- Author
-
Nelles, Dominik, Amli, Hazem, Sugiura, Atsushi, Vij, Vivian, Beiert, Thomas, Nickenig, Georg, Kütting, Daniel, Schrickel, Jan Wilko, and Sedaghat, Alexander
- Subjects
- *
STROKE prevention , *PREOPERATIVE care , *CARDIAC surgery , *ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY , *TIME , *HEART septum , *ATRIAL fibrillation , *RETROSPECTIVE studies , *ACQUISITION of data , *SURGERY , *PATIENTS , *TREATMENT duration , *CONTRAST media , *TREATMENT effectiveness , *COMPARATIVE studies , *HEART atrium , *MEDICAL records , *RADIATION doses , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *COMPUTED tomography , *LEFT heart atrium , *EVALUATION - Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the role of the CT‐derived angle between the intra‐atrial septum (IAS) and the left atrial appendage (LAA) on procedural complexity and clinical outcomes in left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedures. Background: Given the broad variations in anatomy, LAAO remains one of the most challenging interventional procedures in structural heart disease. In recent years, preprocedural cardiac tomography (CT) has evolved as a valuable tool; however, prediction of procedural complexity remains cumbersome. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 47 patients that underwent LAAO at our center in whom pre‐procedural cardiac CT‐scans were available. Among other baseline parameters, we measured the angle between the LAA ostium and the preferred transseptal puncture site at the IAS. We compared patients with an angle above and below the median regarding procedural characteristics and procedural outcome. Results: The median angle between the LAA and the IAS was 127.3° (IQR: 120.9–141.3). LAAO took longer in patients with a measured angle below the median (55.0 ± 22.7 min vs. 41.3 ± 17.5 min; p =.04), resulting in longer radiation times (13.0 ± 5.3 min vs. 9.8 ± 5.7 min; p =.04) and more contrast use (61.1 ± 47.5 mL vs. 33.6 ± 24.7 mL; p =.05). Moreover, the necessity for a sheath exchange was significantly higher (30.4% vs. 4.2%, p =.02) and device repositioning or device resizing trended to be more frequent (26.1% vs. 8.3%; p =.1 and 21.7% vs. 8.3%; p =.2). There were no differences in procedural outcome, device‐position and peri‐device leak (PDL). Conclusions: The angle between the transseptal puncture site and the LAA ostium may serve as a predictor for more demanding LAAO interventions. In our study a steeper angle led to a prolonged procedure resulting in higher doses of contrast and radiation, but was not associated with a worse procedural outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF