101. Prior knowledge of the clinical picture does not introduce bias in the histopathologic diagnosis of melanocytic skin lesions.
- Author
-
Ferrara, Gerardo, Annessi, Giorgio, Argenyi, Zsolt, Argenziano, Giuseppe, Beltraminelli, Helmut, Cerio, Rino, Cerroni, Lorenzo, Cota, Carlo, Simonetti, Stefano, Stefanato, Catherine M., Zalaudek, Iris, Kittler, Harald, and Soyer, H. Peter
- Subjects
- *
SKIN cancer diagnosis , *MELANOCYTES , *SKIN cancer patients , *DERMATOLOGISTS , *HISTOPATHOLOGY - Abstract
A common debate among dermatopathologists is that prior knowledge of the clinical picture of melanocytic skin neoplasms may introduce a potential bias in the histopathologic examination. Histologic slides from 99 melanocytic skin neoplasms were circulated among 10 clinical dermatologists, all of them formally trained and board-certified dermatopathologists: 5 dermatopathologists had clinical images available after a 'blind' examination (Group 1); the other 5 had clinical images available before microscopic examination (Group 2). Data from the two groups were compared regarding 'consensus' (a diagnosis in agreement by ≥4 dermatopathologists/group), chance-corrected interobserver agreement (Fleiss' k) and level of diagnostic confidence ( LDC: a 1-5 arbitrary scale indicating 'increasing reliability' of any given diagnosis). Compared with Group 1 dermatopathologists, Group 2 achieved a lower number of consensus (84 vs. 90) but a higher k value (0.74 vs. 0.69) and a greater mean LDC value (4.57 vs. 4.32). The same consensus was achieved by the two groups in 81/99 cases. Spitzoid neoplasms were most frequently controversial for both groups. The histopathologic interpretation of melanocytic neoplasms seems to be not biased by the knowledge of the clinical picture before histopathologic examination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF