51. Do political parties matter in bringing about a democratic transition? An analysis of their role after Bouteflika's resignation in Algeria.
- Author
-
SZMOLKA, INMACULADA
- Subjects
- *
PUBLIC demonstrations , *COLLECTIVE behavior , *POLITICAL parties , *DEMOCRACY , *DEMOCRATIZATION , *CIVIL society , *ELECTION of legislators , *POLITICAL participation , *PRESIDENTIAL elections , *AUTHORITARIAN personality - Abstract
President Bouteflika's resignation in April 2019, in response to large public demonstrations, opened a democratic window of opportunity for regime change in Algeria. Nevertheless, despite widespread disaffection with the regime, opposition parties have been incapable of triggering a democratic transition in Algeria. The military took control of the situation and imposed its own roadmap to put an end to the political crisis, pushing for presidential elections in December 2019. The elected president, Tebboune, a former prime minister under Bouteflika's presidency, introduced a constitutional amendment in 2020 and called for parliamentary elections to be held on June 12th, 2021. This article analyzes the political stances and actions by the Algerian political parties regarding these political processes that were intended to be the foundations of the new republic. The case study of the Algerian crisis contributes to the theories on democratization and authoritarian resilience. It does so by showing that, even under favourable conditions of intense social pressure for democratic change and widespread disaffection with the authoritarian regime, political parties cannot be a democratizing agent if: (1) the opposition remains divided; (2) the parties do not build broad opposition alliances, not only between parties but also with civil society; and (3) the political regime retains the support of a number of loyal political parties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF