51. Comparing Insulin Pump Devices in Real Life: The AWeSoMe Study Group Prospective Experience
- Author
-
Marianna Rachmiel, Galia Barash, Dikla Pivko-Levy, Zohar Landau, Noah Gruber, Orit Pinhas-Hamiel, and Yael Levy-Shraga
- Subjects
Blood Glucose ,Male ,Insulin pump ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,medicine.medical_treatment ,030209 endocrinology & metabolism ,03 medical and health sciences ,Insulin Infusion Systems ,0302 clinical medicine ,Endocrinology ,Internal medicine ,Diabetes mellitus ,Humans ,Hypoglycemic Agents ,Insulin ,Medicine ,In real life ,Prospective Studies ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Child ,Glycemic ,Glycated Hemoglobin ,Type 1 diabetes ,business.industry ,Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring ,medicine.disease ,Medical Laboratory Technology ,Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 ,Patient Satisfaction ,Quality of Life ,Female ,business - Abstract
The use of insulin pumps in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) has expanded; however, data comparing devices remain scarce. We compared glycemic control, technical difficulties, and quality of life (QOL) between pump devices of three companies.This prospective observational trial is based on clinical data retrieved during 12 months of follow-up of pediatric patients who started pump therapy as part of their clinical care in four medical centers. The devices fully reimbursed by the national health insurance are as follows: MiniMed™ 640G, MiniMedOf 113 children (mean age 9.1 ± 4.1 years, 46% females), 68 (60%) used Medtronic devices, 33 (29%) OmniPod, and 12 (11%) Animas devices. Twelve percent of the cohort stopped using the pump during the study period, with no difference according to device. There were no differences between groups regarding mean SMBG values (P = 0.86), insulin TDD (P = 0.24), BMI (P = 0.87), level of insertion site pain or local reaction (P = 0.51), technical problems (P = 0.66), and QOL (P = 0.38). Changes in HbA1c from study initiation to end were also not statistically significant for any of the devices: from 7.99% ± 1.14% to 7.93% ± 0.99% for Medtronic, from 7.71% ± 1.29% to 7.92% ± 1.38% for OmniPod, and from 8.75% ± 1.3% to 7.70% ± 1.33% for Animas (P = 0.63).Pump devices were comparable regarding glycemic control, weight gain, and satisfaction among pediatric patients with T1D.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF