Search

Background: Microsatellite stability (MSS) or mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is resistant to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Studies have shown that antiangiogenic drugs combined with programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors can improve immunosuppression. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of fruquintinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor (FP) and regorafenib combined with PD-1 inhibitor (RP) in the treatment of advanced mCRC with MSS or pMMR. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively collected advanced MSS or pMMR mCRC patient data from The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang, China, from June 2019 to March 2021. Then, we analyzed and compared the efficacy and safety of FP and RP. Results: A total of 51 patients who met the criteria were divided into FP (n = 28) and RP groups (n = 23). The overall response rate of the FP and RP groups was 7.1% and 8.7% and the disease control rate was 89.3% and 56.5%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was higher in the FP group than in the RP group (6.4 vs. 3.9 months, respectively; P = 0.0209). Patients with no liver metastasis, KRAS wild type, and left colon tumor may benefit from FP. Eight patients (15.7%) had grade 3 toxicity related to treatment. Cox multivariate regression analysis showed that the treatment method was an independent risk factor for median PFS time. Conclusion: Our study indicates that FP could improve PFS time of patients with advanced mCRC compared with RP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To determine the cost-effectiveness of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (LP) in patients with microsatellite stable (MSS), recurrent, pretreated endometrial cancer (EC). A decision analysis model was created to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of LP relative to doxorubicin, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent pretreated MSS EC. Published data was used to estimate quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and drug cost estimates were obtained using average wholesale prices. A health state utility (HSU) penalty of −0.10 was applied to the LP group to account for treatment toxicity. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated to determine cost/QALY. The willingness to pay threshold (WTP) was set at $100,000 per QALY saved. Sensitivity analyses were performed on cost, effectiveness, and HSU penalty for LP. Costs of treatment with doxorubicin, PLD, and bevacizumab are $23.7 million (M), $56.9 M, and $250.8 M respectively. Cost of treatment with LP is $1.8 billion. Relative to doxorubicin, the ICERs for PLD, bevacizumab, and LP are $56,808, $345,824, and $1.6 M respectively. A sensitivity analysis varying the cost of LP shows that if the combined drug cost decreases from over $58,000 to less than $11,000 per cycle, this strategy would be cost-effective. Eliminating the HSU penalty for LP decreased the ICER $1.0 M while increasing the penalty to −0.20 increased the ICER to $3.7 M. LP is not cost-effective in patients with recurrent pretreated, MSS EC. A dramatic reduction in cost of LP is required for this novel strategy to be cost-effective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the frequency of mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal carcinoma determined by immunohistochemistry. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Histopathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Rawalpindi, from Aug 2018 to Jan 2019. Methodology: A total of 101 patients of adenocarcinoma of colorectum who underwent surgical resections and their characteristic and clinical data were recorded. Immunohistochemical stains were performed using antibodies MLH1, MSH2, PMS2 and MSH6. Results were interpreted and mismatch repair deficiency status of all patients was determined. Patients with loss of expression for MLH1, MSH2, PMS2 and MSH6 antibodies were observed and noted. Results: In this study, out of 101 patients with CRC, 71 (70.3%) were male and 30 (29.7%) female. The mean age was (54 years ± 15.9). Amongst the 101 cases loss of immunohistochemical staining for MMR proteins was noted in 19 patients (18.8%). The combined loss of all four antibodies was seen in one case, loss of MLH1 and PMS2 in 7, MSH2 and MSH6 in 5 and MLH1 only in 6 patients. However, no mismatch repair deficiency was detected in remaining 82 cases. According to statistical analysis no significant association between mismatch repair deficiency and variables was found. Conclusion: The frequency of mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal carcinoma patients was found to be 18.8% in our population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The generation of long-term durable tumor immunity and prolonged disease-free survival depends on the ability to generate and support CD8+ central memory T-cells. Microsatellite-stable colon cancer is resistant to currently available immunotherapies; thus, development of novel mechanisms to increase both lymphocyte infiltration and central memory formation are needed to improve outcomes in these patients. We have previously demonstrated that both interleukin-2 (IL-2) and LIGHT (TNFSF14) independently enhance antitumor immune responses and hypothesize that combination immunotherapy may increase the CD8+ central memory T-cell response. Murine colorectal cancer tumors were established in syngeneic mice. Tumors were treated with control, soluble, or liposomal IL-2 at established intervals. A subset of animal tumors overexpressed tumor necrosis superfamily factor LIGHT (TNFSF14). Peripheral blood, splenic, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were isolated for phenotypic studies and flow cytometry. Tumors exposed to a combination of LIGHT and IL-2 experienced a decrease in tumor size compared with IL-2 alone that was not demonstrated in wild-type tumors or between other treatment groups. Combination exposure also increased splenic central memory CD8+ cells compared with IL-2 administration alone, while not increasing tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. In the periphery, the combination enhanced levels of circulating CD8 T-cells and central memory T-cells, while also increasing circulating T-regulatory cells. Combination of IL-2, whether soluble or liposomal, with exposure to LIGHT results in increased CD8+ central memory cells in the spleen and periphery. New combination immunotherapy strategies that support both effector and memory T-cell functions are critical to enhancing durable antitumor responses and warrant further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The neogenic recombinases are potentially a source of genetic variability possibly implicated in the mechanisms of genetic instability involved in the processes of carcinogenesis. One of these neogenic recombinases is the nuclear apoptosis-inducing factor 1(NAIF1), which codes the protein NAIF1 that induces apoptosis in various human cancers. The aim of this work is to study the expression of NAIF1 neogene in cancerous and non-cancerous colorectal tissues. The protein expression of NAIF1gene has been studied by western blot method in the samples of protein extracted from 29 patients with colorectal cancer. The result of this study showed that the protein expression of NAIF1 was found in both cancerous and non-cancerous colorectal tissues, but it is highly expressed in non-cancerous tissues adjacent to cancerous one. Its expression is higher in non-metastatic cancerous tissues compared with metastatic one. Also this expression is higher in microsatellite instable (MSI) group of cancer compared with microsatellite stable (MSS) group. It can be concluded that NAIF1 protein expression inversely related with more advanced stage or grade of colorectal cancer and it may have a role in inhibition of proliferation, migration and invasion of colorectal cancer by inducing apoptosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The prognostic implication of wild‐type APC (APC‐WT) in microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is not well defined. Materials and Methods: APC prognostic value was evaluated retrospectively in two independent cohorts of patient with MSS mCRC with a confirmatory analysis from a public data set from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC). Results: In comparison with the APC‐mutant (APC‐MT) population (n = 255), APC‐WT patients (n = 86) tended to be younger (59% of age < 40 vs. 26% of age > 50), right‐sided (41.7% vs. 27%), BRAFV600E mutated (23.3% vs. 0.8%), and KRAS wild type (65.1% vs. 49.8%). Alternative WNT pathway alterations, RNF43 and CTNNB1, were over‐represented in the APC‐WT versus APC‐MT population (7% vs. 0.4% and 4.7% vs. 0.4%, respectively). APC‐WT patients had a worse overall survival (OS) than APC‐MT patients (22.6 vs. 45.6 months, p <.0001). Using a multivariate model correcting for primary tumor location, RAS and BRAF status, APC‐WT was predictive of poor survival (APC‐MT vs. APC‐WT, hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44–0.86, p =.0037). The prognostic implication of APC‐WT on OS was confirmed further in a similar multivariate model of 934 stage IV patients from MSKCC public database (APC‐MT vs. APC‐WT, HR, 0.63, 95% CI, 0.49–0.81, p <.0001). Conclusion: APC‐WT is associated with poor OS in MSS mCRC regardless of RAS and BRAF status. Compared with APC‐MT mCRC tumors, APC‐WT tumors were associated with other Wnt activating alterations, including RNF43 and CTNBB1. Our data suggest alternative therapy needs to be investigated in APC‐WT patients. Implications for Practice: Patients with microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer with wild‐type APC had a worse overall survival than patients with mutated APC regardless of RAS/RAF status. APC status should be considered as a stratification factor in prospective trials, and novel therapeutic strategies need to be developed for this subgroup of patients. Despite advancements in therapy, colorectal cancer is still a leading cause of cancer‐related death in the U.S. This article evaluates the prognostic value of wild‐type APC in patients with microsatellite stable colorectal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cohorts A, C, and E of the phase Ib KEYNOTE-651 study evaluated pembrolizumab + binimetinib ± chemotherapy in microsatellite stable/mismatch repair-proficient metastatic colorectal cancer., Patients and Methods: Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus binimetinib 30 mg twice daily alone (cohort A; previously treated with any chemotherapy) or with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (cohort C; previously untreated) or 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan (cohort E; previously treated with 1 line of therapy including fluoropyrimidine + oxaliplatin-based regimen) every 2 weeks. Binimetinib dose-escalation to 45 mg twice daily was planned in all cohorts using a modified toxicity probability interval design (target dose-limiting toxicity [DLT], 30%). The primary endpoint was safety; investigator-assessed objective response rate was secondary., Results: In cohort A, 1/6 patients (17%) had DLTs with binimetinib 30 mg; none occurred in 14 patients with 45 mg. In cohort C, 3/9 patients (33%) had DLTs with binimetinib 30 mg; dose was not escalated to 45 mg. In cohort E, 1/5 patients (20%) had DLTs with binimetinib 30 mg; 5/10 patients (50%) had DLTs with 45 mg. Enrollment was stopped in cohort E binimetinib 45 mg and deescalated to 30 mg; 2/4 additional patients (50%) had DLTs with binimetinib 30 mg (total 3/9 [33%] had DLTs with binimetinib 30 mg). Objective response rate was 0% in cohort A, 9% in cohort C, and 15% in cohort E., Conclusion: Per DLT criteria, binimetinib + pembrolizumab (cohort A) was tolerable, binimetinib + pembrolizumab + 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (cohort C) did not qualify for binimetinib dose escalation to 45 mg, and binimetinib + pembrolizumab + 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan (cohort E) required binimetinib dose reduction from 45 to 30 mg. No new safety findings were observed across cohorts. There was no apparent additive efficacy when binimetinib + pembrolizumab was added to chemotherapy. Data did not support continued enrollment in cohorts C and E., Competing Interests: Disclosure E. X. Chen reports advisory/consultancy roles from AstraZeneca, Eisai, and GSK; research funding to their institution from AstraZeneca, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, BMS, Novartis, Roche, Zymeworks, and 1Globe. P. Kavan reports advisory/consultancy role with Merck; Expert Testimony for Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA; and an institutional educational grant to their institution. M. Tehfe reports advisory/consultancy roles with Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, BMS, Taiho, and Pfizer; and speaker bureau for BMS and Taiho. J. S. Kortmansky reports research funding to their institution from Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA and Genentech. M. B. Sawyer reports honoraria from Ipsen, BMS, Mylan, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Sandoz, Celgene, Servier, Novartis, Leo, Taiho, and Shire; advisory/consultancy roles with AstraZeneca, Leo, and Immuneering; expert testimony for AstraZeneca; research funding to their institution from AstraZeneca and BMS; and travel/accommodation expenses from Ipsen. E. G. Chiorean reports advisory/consultancy roles with Astellas, Bayer, Cardiff, Foundation, G1 Therapeutics, Ipsen, Noxxon, Novartis, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, Pfizer, and Stemline; research funding to their institution from Aadi, Biosplice, BioMed Valley, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Clovis, Corcept, Erasca, Fibrogen, Lona, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, Novartis, Rafael, and Stemline; and travel/accommodation from G1 Therapeutics. C. H. Lieu reports research funding to their institution from Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. M. Fakih reports advisory/consultancy roles with AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Mirati, Nouscom, PsiOxus, Roche/Genentech, and Taiho. K. Spencer reports advisory/consultancy roles from QED Therapeutics, Helsinn, Lynx Group, and Caris. C. Li, P. Leconte, and D. Adelberg report employment with Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA; P. Leconte and D. Adelberg report stock ownership at Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. R. Kim reports honoraria from Taiho; advisory/consultancy roles with Bayer Servier, Ipsen and Roche; and speaker bureau for Eisai, Pfizer, and Incyte. B. Polite, L. Wong, and J. Chaves report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The phase 1b KEYNOTE-651 study evaluated pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in microsatellite stable or mismatch repair-proficient metastatic colorectal cancer., Patients and Methods: Patients with microsatellite stable or mismatch repair-proficient metastatic colorectal cancer received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (previously untreated; cohort B) or 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan (previously treated with fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin; cohort D) every 2 weeks. Primary end point was safety; investigator-assessed objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 was secondary and biomarker analysis was exploratory., Results: Thirty-one patients were enrolled in cohort B and 32 in cohort D; median follow-up was 30.2 and 33.5 months, respectively. One dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 small intestine obstruction) occurred in cohort D. In cohort B, grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 18 patients (58%), most commonly neutropenia and decreased neutrophil count (n = 5 each). In cohort D, grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 17 patients (53%), most commonly neutropenia (n = 7). No grade 5 treatment-related AEs occurred. Objective response rate was 61% in cohort B (KRAS wildtype: 71%; KRAS mutant: 53%) and 25% in cohort D (KRAS wildtype: 47%; KRAS mutant: 6%). In both cohorts, PD-L1 combined positive score and T-cell-inflamed gene expression profiles were higher and HER2 expression was lower in responders than nonresponders. No association between tumor mutational burden and response was observed., Conclusion: Pembrolizumab plus 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan demonstrated an acceptable AE profile. Efficacy data appeared comparable with current standard of care (including by KRAS mutation status). Biomarker analyses were hypothesis-generating, warranting further exploration., Gov Identifier: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03374254., Competing Interests: Disclosure R. Kim reports honoraria from Taiho; advisory/consultancy roles with Bayer Servier, Ipsen, and Roche; and speakers bureau for Eisai, Pfizer, and Incyte. M. Tehfe reports advisory/consultancy roles with Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, BMS, Taiho, and Pfizer; and speakers bureau for BMS and Taiho. P. Kavan reports advisory/consultancy role with Merck; expert testimony for Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA; and an institutional educational grant to their institution. J. S. Kortmansky reports research funding to their institution from Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, and Genentech. E. X. Chen reports advisory/consultancy roles from AstraZeneca, Eisai, and GSK and research funding to their institution from AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, BMS, Novartis, Roche, Zymeworks, and 1Globe. C. H. Lieu reports advisory/consultancy roles with Natera; and research funding to their institution from Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. M. Fakih reports advisory/consultancy roles with AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Mirati, Nouscom, PsiOxus, Roche/Genentech, and Taiho. K. Spencer reports advisory/consultancy roles with QED Therapeutics, Helsinn, Lynx Group, and Caris. Q. Zhao reports stock ownership at Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. R. Predoiu, C. Li, P. Leconte, and D. Adelberg report employment with Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. P. Leconte and D. Adelberg report stock ownership at Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. E. G. Chiorean reports advisory/consultancy roles with Astellas, Bayer, Cardiff, Foundation, G1 Therapeutics, Ipsen, Noxxon, Novartis, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, Pfizer, and Stemline; research funding to their institution from Aadi, Biosplice, BioMed Valley, Boehringer Ingelheim, Clovis, Corcept, Erasca, Fibrogen, Lona, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, Novartis, Rafael, and Stemline; and travel/accommodations from G1 Therapeutics. J. Chaves and L. Wong report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

BackgroundMicrosatellite stable (MSS) or mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is resistant to immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, a recent Japanese trial showed that regorafenib plus nivolumab had encouraging anti-cancer activity in MSS or pMMR mCRCs.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the efficacy and safety data of combination therapy with regorafenib plus anti-PD-1 antibody in patients with refractory MSS or pMMR mCRC in the medical centers of Shandong Province in China.ResultsTwenty-three patients with MSS or pMMR mCRC received regorafenib plus anti-PD-1 antibody. Eighteen (78.3%) patients experienced stable disease as best response, five (21.7%) patients had progressive disease, and no partial response was observed. The disease control rate (DCR) was 78.3% (18/23), and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.1 months (95% CI, 2.32-3.89). Four of five (80.0%) patients with progressive disease had baseline liver metastasis, while nine of 18 (50.0%) patients with stable disease displayed no liver metastasis. One patient receiving radiofrequency ablation treatment for liver and abdominal wall metastases prior to combination treatment experienced a remarkably prolonged PFS of 9.2 months with SD. Neither liver metastasis status nor previous exposure to regorafenib was associated with treatment outcome. Treatment-related grade 3 toxicities were observed in 5/23 (21.7%) patients.ConclusionNo objective response was observed with the combination of regorafenib plus anti-PD-1 antibody, suggesting its little clinical activity in unselected Chinese patients with pMMR/MSS mCRC. Meanwhile, it exhibited some potential benefit in this cohort in terms of DCR and PFS. Adverse events were generally tolerable and manageable. Prospective studies with large sample sizes are needed to verify the findings. This combination strategy plus local ablative therapy might be worthy of further exploration.

Background: Microsatellite stable (MSS) or mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is resistant to immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, a recent Japanese trial showed that regorafenib plus nivolumab had encouraging anti-cancer activity in MSS or pMMR mCRCs. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the efficacy and safety data of combination therapy with regorafenib plus anti-PD-1 antibody in patients with refractory MSS or pMMR mCRC in the medical centers of Shandong Province in China. Results: Twenty-three patients with MSS or pMMR mCRC received regorafenib plus anti-PD-1 antibody. Eighteen (78.3%) patients experienced stable disease as best response, five (21.7%) patients had progressive disease, and no partial response was observed. The disease control rate (DCR) was 78.3% (18/23), and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.1 months (95% CI, 2.32-3.89). Four of five (80.0%) patients with progressive disease had baseline liver metastasis, while nine of 18 (50.0%) patients with stable disease displayed no liver metastasis. One patient receiving radiofrequency ablation treatment for liver and abdominal wall metastases prior to combination treatment experienced a remarkably prolonged PFS of 9.2 months with SD. Neither liver metastasis status nor previous exposure to regorafenib was associated with treatment outcome. Treatment-related grade 3 toxicities were observed in 5/23 (21.7%) patients. Conclusion: No objective response was observed with the combination of regorafenib plus anti-PD-1 antibody, suggesting its little clinical activity in unselected Chinese patients with pMMR/MSS mCRC. Meanwhile, it exhibited some potential benefit in this cohort in terms of DCR and PFS. Adverse events were generally tolerable and manageable. Prospective studies with large sample sizes are needed to verify the findings. This combination strategy plus local ablative therapy might be worthy of further exploration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) alone or in combination with chemotherapy (CT) are the current standard of therapy in several cancer types. Patients (pts) with lung cancer display higher response rates to CT when given after ICIs. Although ICIs have failed to demonstrate antitumour activity in microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), little is known about CT effect after ICIs. We aimed to assess whether sequential ICIs followed by CT may be an alternative therapeutic approach in a population of pts with mCRC. We retrospectively assessed CT after ICI (CAICI) failure in pts with mCRC. The ICI regimen consisted of anti-PD(L)1 alone or in combination. The primary end-point was objective response rate. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were secondary end-points. Between 2014 and 2018, 29 pts with mCRC received CAICI (MSS tumours, 27 pts [86%]). The median number of previous lines was 4 (range, 2–7). Regimens included TAS-102 (n = 14), FOLFIRI (irinotecan, leucovorin, and fluorouracil; n = 6) or FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil; n = 4), regorafenib (n = 3) and carboplatin (1 pt with BRCA mutation). Partial response and stable disease were observed in 4 (19%) and 9 (43%) pts, respectively (disease control rate, 62%). The median PFS and OS were 3.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.5–5.4) and 8.0 months (95% CI = 4.2–14.0), respectively. ICIs administered before CT might enhance cytotoxic effects even in pts with immunorefractory MSS mCRC. The results of this small cohort need to be validated in independent prospective cohorts. The role of ICIs as modifiers of both tumour cells and microenvironment in mCRC deserves further research. • Chemotherapy (CT) beyond immunotherapy was assessed in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). • Immunotherapy followed by CT provides tumour control in mCRC. • Immunorefractory mCRC could benefit from sequential immunotherapy and CT. • Immunotherapy-induced delayed effects might enhance chemotherapy in mCRC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Programmed death 1 (PD-1)-targeted therapy has benefited patients with microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the efficacy of PD-1-targeted therapy is poor in patients with microsatellite-stable (MSS) mCRC. Therefore, it is imperative to explore additional co-inhibitory molecular signalling pathways to improve the efficacy of immunotherapy in MSS mCRC treatment. In the present study, the association between cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) expression and the survival of patients with CRC was analysed using RNA sequencing data from 605 patients, including 121 cases of mortality, from human cancer datasets. Furthermore, 35 clinical MSS stage III–IV CRC specimens were collected to assess CDK9 protein expression by immunohistochemistry, and the frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells was assessed by flow cytometry. The human cancer datasets demonstrated that upregulation CDK9 significantly shortened the survival of patients with stage II–IV colon cancer. Additionally, CDK9 mRNA expression was positively correlated with the expression levels of genes associated with immune evasion in the tumor. Notably, CDK9 was expression was upregulated in stage IV CRC compared with para-cancerous tissues and early-stage tumors. Interestingly, CDK9 expression was negatively associated with the infiltration of CD8+ T cells at the tumor site. In addition, the expression levels of T-cell immunoglobulin mucin family member 3 and CD39, proteins associated with exhaustion, on tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells were significantly elevated in patients with abnormal CDK9 expression levels. The present study demonstrated that CDK9 expression was negatively associated with CD8+ T cell infiltration and positively associated with CD8+ T cell exhaustion in MSS mCRC. In conclusion, CDK9 may be utilized to evaluate the prognosis and the immune-type of the tumor microenvironment in patients with MSS mCRC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A small subset of patients with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR)/microsatellite stable (MSS)-colorectal cancer (CRC) benefit from immunotherapy with anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the immune status of patients with pMMR/microsatellite instability-low (MSI-L)/MSS-CRC and deficient MMR (dMMR)/MSI-high (MSI-H)-CRC in order to identify responders to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. The current study used a dataset downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) as well as 219 clinical tissue samples to investigate the infiltrating grade of cluster of differentiation (CD) 4 and CD8 tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), the expression levels of PD-L1 and PD-L2, the interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and CD8 T effector gene signatures, and the phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (p-STAT1) status in patients with pMMR/MSI-L/MSS-CRC and dMMR/MSI-H-CRC. Analysis of TCGA dataset revealed that the mRNA expression levels of PD-L1 and PD-L2, the IFN-γ gene signature and the CD8 T effector gene signature were significantly upregulated in MSI-H tumors compared with MSI-L/MSS tumors. Additionally, a subpopulation of patients with upregulation of the IFN-γ and CD8 T effector gene signatures was observed in those with MSI-L/MSS-CRC. Immunohistochemical staining of the clinical samples revealed a subpopulation of patients with pMMR-CRC that were positive for PD-L1 and p-STAT1, and whom had levels of elevated CD8(+) and CD4(+) TILs infiltration similar to those observed in patients with dMMR-CRC. The results obtained in the current study suggested that a subpopulation of patients with MSI-L/MSS-CRC and pMMR-CRC with upregulated IFN-γ and CD8 T effector gene signatures may benefit from immunotherapy with antibodies against PD-1 and PD-L1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Microsatellite instability (MSI) accounts for 15-20% of colorectal cancer (CRC) and is considered to have favorable stage-adjusted prognosis compared to Microsatellite stable (MSS) CRCs. Determination of MSI in stage II CRC is important for management decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy administration. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic and predictive significance of MSI in stage 2 CRC in the Indian scenario.Materials and Methods: A total of 195 patients who underwent curative surgery for stage II CRC from 2010 to 2017 were included. MSI testing by immunohistochemistry (DNA MisMatch Repair proteins) was performed in all. Various clinicopathological factors and disease-free survival and overall survival were assessed between MSI and MSS groups. The effect of treatment in terms of survival benefits with adjuvant therapy in the MSI group was also assessed.Results: 27.1% of the CRCs' showed MSI. Younger age (<50 years), family history of cancer, synchronous/metachronous malignancies, proximal (right sided) location, poor morphological tumour differentiation, mucin production, and presence of peritumoral (Crohn's-like) lymphocytic response showed statistically significant association with MSI. Majority (56%) of our patients showed combined loss of MLH1 and PMS2. Overall, survival among the MSI patients was significantly higher (76.6 ± 4.149 months) than the MSS patients (65.05 ± 3.555)P= 0.04. MSI patients did not show any differences in survival with or without treatment.Conclusion: This study highlights the distinct clinicopathological features of MSI-related CRC and the relevance of MSI testing of stage II CRC for management decisions and prognostication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The process of molecular domestication which had been occured in some DNA transposons (2nd class of transposable elements) led to the formation of novel genes, which are called “Neogenes”. These neogenes may play an important role in the human genetic instability, human diseases and cancer. One of these Neogene is nuclear apoptosis-inducing factor 1(NAIF1) which inducing apoptosis in various human cancers. The aim of this work is to study the expression of NAIF1 Neogene in leukaemia cell lines. The protein expression of NAIF1gene has been studied by western blot method in seven leu-kaemia cell lines (HL60, NB4, KG1, KG1a, ML2, THP1 and U937) and in a healthy tissue of blood as a control. The result of this study showed that the protein expression of NAIF1 in leukaemia cell lines were found in variable degree of expression, which was highly expressed in healthy blood tis-sue. From the results of this work, it can be concluded that NAIF1 protein may have a role in inhi-bition of proliferation, migration and invasion of leukaemia by inducing apoptosis, which need further research and confirmation.

KRAS mutation is a well‐known marker for poor response to targeted treatment and patient prognosis in microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC). However, variation in clinical outcomes among patients wild‐type for KRAS underlines that this is not a homogeneous population. Here, we evaluated the prognostic impact of KRAS alternative splicing in relation to mutation status in a single‐hospital series of primary MSS CRCs (N = 258). Using splicing‐sensitive microarrays and RNA sequencing, the relative expression of KRAS‐4A versus KRAS‐4B transcript variants was confirmed to be down‐regulated in CRC compared to normal colonic mucosa (N = 41; p ≤ 0.001). This was independent of mutation status, however, gene set enrichment analysis revealed that the effect of splicing on KRAS signaling was specific to the KRAS wild‐type subgroup, in which low relative KRAS‐4A expression was associated with a higher level of KRAS signaling (p = 0.005). In concordance, the prognostic value of KRAS splicing was also dependent on mutation status, and for patients with Stage I–III KRAS wild‐type MSS CRC, low relative KRAS‐4A expression was associated with inferior overall survival (HR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.07–5.18, p = 0.033), a result not found in mutant cases (pinteraction = 0.026). The prognostic association in the wild‐type subgroup was independent of clinicopathological factors, including cancer stage in multivariable analysis (HR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.18–6.09, p = 0.018). This suggests that KRAS has prognostic value beyond mutation status in MSS CRC, and highlights the importance of molecular heterogeneity in the clinically relevant KRAS wild‐type subgroup. What's new? Patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC) that lacks KRAS mutation benefit from targeted therapy. Nonetheless, variations in clinical outcome suggest that KRAS wild‐type CRC is a heterogeneous disease. Here, two KRAS transcript variants, KRAS‐4A and KRAS‐4B, generated through alternative splicing, were investigated in relation to KRAS mutation status and MSS CRC prognosis. Aberrant splicing resulting in low expression of the KRAS‐4A transcript variant, relative to the KRAS‐4B transcript, was associated with increased KRAS signaling and poor patient prognosis specifically in KRAS wild‐type MSS CRC. The findings suggest that KRAS splicing is of prognostic relevance in KRAS wild‐type CRC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of AL-yarmouk Journall is the property of Republic of Iraq Ministry of Higher Education & Scientific Research (MOHESR) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

For colorectal cancer (CRC), surgical resection remains essential for achieving good prognoses. Unfortunately, numerous patients with locally advanced CRC and metastatic CRC failed to meet surgical indications or achieve pathological complete response after surgery. Perioperative therapy has been proven to effectively lower tumor staging and reduce recurrence and metastasis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown unprecedented prolongation of survival time and satisfactory safety in patients with high microsatellite instability/deficient mismatch repair (MSI-H/dMMR), while the therapeutic effect obtained by patients with mismatch repair-proficient or microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) was considered minimal. However, recent studies found that certain CRC patients with dMMR/MSI-H presented intrinsic or acquired immune resistance, and pMMR/MSS CRC patients can also achieve better efficacy. Therefore, more predictors are required for screening patients with potential clinical benefits. Since the discovery of synergistic effects between immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, different immunotherapy-based therapies have been applied to the perioperative therapy of CRC in an increasing number of research. This review comprehensively summarized the past and current progress of different combinations of immunotherapy in perioperative clinical trials for CRC, focusing on the efficacy and safety, and points out the direction for future development., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Chen, Zhou, Han, Wei and Qiu.)

Introduction: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved pembrolizumab for patients with unresectable or metastatic solid tumors with tumor mutational burden (TMB) of ≥ 10 mutations/megabase. However, the clinical implications of this universal cutoff of TMB ≥ 10 for patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) remain debatable., Areas Covered: In this review, we discuss the tissue agnostic approval of pembrolizumab, its efficacy, and clinical relevance in the management of patients with MSS CRC patients with high TMB (defined as TMB ≥ 10). We also elaborate on molecular subgroups of MSS CRC that influence the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response for patients with MSS CRC, including pathogenic POLE and POLD1 mutations associated with ultramutated tumors., Expert Opinion: Patients with microsatellite stable CRC with TMB ≥ 10 without POLE and POLD1 mutations may not significantly benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy. Predetermined cutoff TMB ≥ 10 mutation per MB does not seem to define a universal cutoff for the benefit of disease-agnostic ICI therapy, particularly for patients with MSS CRC. Patients with POLE/POLD1 mutations with MSS CRC represent a unique biological subgroup of MSS CRC with favorable responses to ICI therapy.

About half of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancers (HNPCCs) fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria (AC) do not display evidence of mismatch repair defects, and the difference between microsatellite-stable (MSS) and microsatellite-unstable HNPCC remains poorly understood. The study was to compare overall copy number variation (CNV) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the entire genome in HNPCCs with MSS and microsatellite-instability (MSI) using the Cytoscan HD Array. This was a study carried out in samples from 20 patients with MSS HNPCC and four patients with MSI HNPCC from the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (China). The microsatellite status was examined using a panel of microsatellite markers. MMR expression status was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Tumor samples were analyzed with the Genome-Wide Human CytoScan HD Array. CNV and LOH were determined. Fourteen specific CNVs (eight gains: 5p13.1, 7p13, 7q22.3, 8q11.21, 8q12.2, 19q13.11, 20q11.21, and 20q11.23; and six losses: 8p22, 8p23.1, 8p23.1, 17p13.1, 17p13.2, and 18q21.3) were associated with MSS HNPCC. Of these 14 CNVs, gain on 8q12.2 and loss on 17p13.1 were novel. The total length of 8q gains and 20q gains were greater in MSS tumors than in MSI ( P < 0.05). The presence of similar levels of copy-neutral-LOH in MSS (31.7%) and MSI (29.7%) HNPCC suggested that unknown DNA repair genes might be involved in the tumorigenesis of MSS HNPCC. MSS HNPCC is a genetically specific population with increased CNV, which are different from MSI HNPCC. The results may help to clarify the genetic basis of MSS HNPCC tumorigenesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of AL-yarmouk Journall is the property of Republic of Iraq Ministry of Higher Education & Scientific Research (MOHESR) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Differences in the pathogenesis of microsatellite stable (MSS) sporadic colorectal cancers (CRCs) between left-sided CRC (LC) and right-sided CRC (RC) have not been clarified. To identify pathogenesis-related genomic differences between MSS CRCs within the two locations, we performed a comprehensive molecular analysis using crypt isolation with samples from 92 sporadic CRCs. Microsatellite instability (MSI; high and low/negative) and DNA methylation status (low methylation epigenome; intermediate methylation epigenome [IME] or high methylation epigenome [HME]) were determined using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) microsatellite analysis and PCR-bisulfite pyrosequencing, respectively. Additionally, mutations in the TP53, KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA genes were examined using PCR-bisulfite pyrosequencing (for KRAS and BRAF mutations) or PCR-single conformation polymorphism (for TP53 and PIK3CA mutations), followed by sequencing of aberrant bands. Finally, a genome-wide study using a copy number alteration (CNA)-targeted single nucleotide polymorphism array was performed. Ninety-two CRCs were classified into 71 MSS and 21 MSI phenotypes. We examined 71 CRCs with the MSS phenotype (LC, 56; RC, 15). Mutations in KRAS were associated with RC with the MSS phenotype, whereas mutations in TP53 were more frequently found in LC with the MSS phenotype. There were significant differences in the frequencies of KRAS and TP53 mutations in the IME between LC and RC with the MSS phenotype. Although CNA gains were associated with LC with the MSS phenotype, CNA losses were not major alterations associated with the MSS phenotype. These findings suggested that the molecular pathogenesis of the MSS phenotype in LC was different from that in RC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]