Search

Background: We recently showed that low dose (5mg/d) tamoxifen (babytam) for 3 years can halve the incidence of new breast neoplastic events in hormone sensitive or unknown breast pre-invasive neoplasia after surgery with limited toxicity (DeCensi et al JCO 2019; 37:1629-37). Here we report the results of circulating surrogate endpoint biomarkers of breast cancer risk with special attention to the risk of ovarian stimulation observed with the full dose in premenopausal women. Methods: Five hundred women 75 years old or younger were randomized to babytam or placebo (PLA). A subgroup of 406 women consented for collection of morning fasting serum at baseline (0), 1 (1Y) and 3 years (3Y) of treatment. There was a loss of about 25% of blood sampling at 3Y. Serum IGF-I, IGFBP-3, SHBG and C-reactive Protein (CRP) were performed on all available samples. Estradiol and testosterone were determined in a subsample (n=285) to determine the extent of ovarian stimulation by babytam in premenopausal women. We used Mann-Whitney test for univariate comparisons and linear regression modeling for multivariate analyses setting changes from baseline (1Y or 3Y minus baseline values) as dependent variable and treatment arm, age, BMI and baseline biomarkers values as explanatory factors. We tested treatment*menopausal status as interaction term. COX P-H model was used to calculate hazard ratio for CRP increase. Results: At baseline, all biomarkers were evenly balanced between arms (data not shown). IGF-I decreased significantly on babytam as compared to PLA. The difference of the changes between arms was -20 ng/mL after 1Y (p Citation Format: Harriet Johansson, Matteo Puntoni, Debora Macis, Valentina Aristarco, Aliana Guerrieri-Gonzaga, Davide Serrano, Silvia Caviglia, Laura Cortesi, Cristiana Taverniti, Antonio Ponti, Maria Grazia Pacquola, Marcella Gulisano, Fabio Falcini, Maria Digennaro, Anna Carriello, Katia Cagossi, Graziella Pinotti, Tania Buttiron Webber, Matteo Lazzeroni, Bernardo Bonanni, Luca Boni, Andrea DeCensi. Effects of low dose tamoxifen on circulating risk biomarkers in a phase III trial in breast pre-invasive disease [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-08.

Background: The EUROCARE-5 study revealed disparities in childhood cancer survival among European countries, giving rise to important initiatives across Europe to reduce the gap. Extending its representativeness through increased coverage of eastern European countries, the EUROCARE-6 study aimed to update survival progress across countries and years of diagnosis and provide new analytical perspectives on estimates of long-term survival and the cured fraction of patients with childhood cancer. Methods: In this population-based study, we analysed 135 847 children (aged 0–14 years) diagnosed during 2000–13 and followed up to the end of 2014, recruited from 80 population-based cancer registries in 31 European countries. We calculated age-adjusted 5-year survival differences by country and over time using period analysis, for all cancers combined and for major cancer types. We applied a variant of standard mixture cure models for survival data to estimate the cure fraction of patients by childhood cancer and to estimate projected 15-year survival. Findings: 5-year survival for all childhood cancer combined in Europe in 2010–14 was 81% (95% CI 81–82), showing an increase of three percentage points compared with 2004–06. Significant progress over time was observed for almost all cancers. Survival remained stable for osteosarcomas, Ewing sarcoma, Burkitt lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphomas, and rhabdomyoscarcomas. For all cancers combined, inequalities still persisted among European countries (with age-adjusted 5-year survival ranging from 71% [95% CI 60–79] to 87% [77–93]). The 15-year survival projection for all patients with childhood cancer diagnosed in 2010–13 was 78%. We estimated the yearly long-term mortality rate due to causes other than the diagnosed cancer to be around 2 per 1000 patients for all childhood cancer combined, but to approach zero for retinoblastoma. The cure fraction for patients with childhood cancer increased over time from 74% (95% CI 73–75) in 1998–2001 to 80% (79–81) in 2010–13. In the latter cohort, the cure fraction rate ranged from 99% (95% CI 74–100) for retinoblastoma to 60% (58–63) for CNS tumours and reached 90% (95% CI 87–93) for lymphoid leukaemia and 70% (67–73) for acute myeloid leukaemia. Interpretation: Childhood cancer survival is increasing over time in Europe but there are still some differences among countries. Regular monitoring of childhood cancer survival and estimation of the cure fraction through population-based registry data are crucial for evaluating advances in paediatric cancer care. Funding: European Commission.

RationalePulse glucocorticoid therapy is used in hyperinflammation related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of pulse intravenous methylprednisolone in addition to standard treatment in COVID-19 pneumonia.MethodsIn this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 304 hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were randomised to receive 1 g of methylprednisolone intravenously for three consecutive days or placebo in addition to standard dexamethasone. The primary outcome was the duration of patient hospitalisation, calculated as the time interval between randomisation and hospital discharge without the need for supplementary oxygen. The key secondary outcomes were survival free from invasive ventilation with orotracheal intubation and overall survival.ResultsOverall, 112 (75.4%) out of 151 patients in the pulse methylprednisolone arm and 111 (75.2%) of 150 in the placebo arm were discharged from hospital without oxygen within 30 days from randomisation. Median time to discharge was similar in both groups (15 days, 95% CI 13.0–17.0 days and 16 days, 95% CI 13.8–18.2 days, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) 0.92, 95% CI 0.71–1.20; p=0.528). No significant differences between pulse methylprednisolone and placebo arms were observed in terms of admission to intensive care unit with orotracheal intubation or death (20.0%versus16.1%; HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.74–2.16; p=0.176) or overall mortality (10.0%versus12.2%; HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.42–1.64; p=0.584). Serious adverse events occurred with similar frequency in the two groups.ConclusionsMethylprenisolone pulse therapy added to dexamethasone was not of benefit in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

The GIM2 phase III trial demonstrated the benefit of dose-dense chemotherapy in node-positive early breast cancer (eBC). To better define the dose-dense effect in the hormone receptor-positive subgroup, we evaluated its benefit through a composite measure of recurrence risk. We conducted an ancillary analysis of the GIM2 trial evaluating the absolute treatment effect through a composite measure of recurrence risk (CPRS) in patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative eBC. CPRS was estimated through Cox proportional hazards models applied to the different clinicopathological features. The treatment effect was compared to the values of CPRS by using the Sub-population Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) process. The Disease-Free Survival (DFS)-oriented STEPP analysis showed distinct patterns of relative treatment effect with respect to CPRS. Overall, 5-year DFS differed across CPRS quartiles ranging from 95.2 to 66.4%. Each CPRS quartile was characterized by a different patients’ composition, especially for age, lymph node involvement, tumor size, estrogen and progesterone receptor expression, and Ki-67. A number needed to treat of 154 and 6 was associated with the lowest and the highest CPRS quartile, respectively. Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy showed a consistent benefit in node-positive eBC patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative disease, but its effect varied according to CPRS.

Subjects increasing sperm DNA fragmentation (sDF) during Density Gradient Centrifugation (DGC), a common sperm selection procedure in Assisted Reproduction Techniques (ARTs), experience a 50% lower probability of pregnancy. Hence, identification of these subjects is of clinical importance. Here, we investigated whether such subjects are identified with higher accuracy detecting DNA fragmentation in viable (viable sDF) instead of total spermatozoa (total sDF) and whether swim up, an alternative procedure to DGC, does not increase sDF. With DGC, we identified 10/20 subjects increasing total sDF, and 2 more subjects using viable sDF. With swim up, we identified 8/40 subjects increasing total sDF, and 8 more subjects using viable sDF. In addition, viable sDF reveals more accurately the increase of the damage when it occurs. Finally, a multivariate analysis demonstrated that the proportional increase of sDF was higher after DGC respect to swim up. In conclusion, viable sDF is a more accurate parameter to reveal the increase of the damage by selection both with swim up and DGC. Swim up increases sDF in some samples, although at a lesser extent than DGC, suggesting that it should be used to select spermatozoa for ARTs when possible.

Background Alternating induction and maintenance phases is a common strategy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Metronomic chemotherapy (metroCT) may represent a well-tolerated chemotherapy backbone for maximising bevacizumab effect during maintenance. The MOMA trial was designed to compare metroCT plus bevacizumab versus bevacizumab alone as maintenance following 4 months of induction with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab. Patients and methods In this phase II study, patients with unresectable mCRC were randomised to receive up to 8 cycles of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab, followed by bevacizumab (arm A) or the same regimen followed by bevacizumab plus metroCT (capecitabine 500 mg/three times per day and cyclophosphamide 50 mg/die, arm B) until disease progression. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). According to the Rubinstein and Korn's design, to detect a hazard ratio[HR] of 0.75 favouring arm B, with 1 sided-alpha and beta errors of 15% and 80%, 173 events and 222 patients were required. Results Between May 2012 and March 2015, 232 patients, mostly with RAS (65%) or BRAF (9%) mutant tumours, were randomised in 16 Italian centres. At a median follow-up of 47.8 months, 210 and 164 progression and death events were registered. The primary end-point was not met. Median PFS was 10.3 and 9.4 months in arm B and A, respectively (HR: 0.94 [70% confidence interval {CI}: 0.82–1.09], p = 0.680). No significant differences were reported in terms of overall survival (OS) (median OS arm B/A: 22.5/28 months; HR: 1.16 [95%CI: 0.99–1.37], p = 0.336). Response rate with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab was 63% (arm B/A: 58%/68%). In the liver-limited subgroup, the secondary resection rate was 49% (arm B/A: 45%/55%). Conclusions The addition of metroCT to maintenance with bevacizumab does not significantly improve PFS of mCRC patients. The activity of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is confirmed in a population with high prevalence of RAS/BRAF mutations treated with a 4-months induction. Trial registration www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02271464.

LBA3505 Background: The association of a chemotherapy doublet (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI) with an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or panitumumab) is an upfront option for the treatment of RAS and BRAF wt mCRC patients. Phase II studies investigating the combination of the triplet FOLFOXIRI with an anti-EGFR reported promising activity results and an acceptable safety profile when lower doses of 5FU and irinotecan were adopted. The added value of intensifying the upfront chemotherapy when combined with a targeted agent in a molecularly selected population is not established. Methods: TRIPLETE is a prospective, open label, phase III trial in which previously untreated patients with unresectable RAS and BRAF wt mCRC were randomized to receive mFOLFOX6/pan (arm A) or mFOLFOXIRI (irinotecan 150 mg/sqm, oxaliplatin 85 mg/sqm, L-leucovorin 200 mg/sqm, 5-fluoruracil 2400 mg/sqm 48 h infusion)/pan (arm B) up to 12 cycles, followed by 5FU/LV/pan until disease progression. The primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Secondary endpoints include safety profile, R0 resection rate, PFS and OS. Under the assumption of an ORR of 60% in arm A, to detect an increase of at least 15% in arm B, a sample size of 432 cases provided approximately 90% power to a two-sided chi square test for heterogeneity at the 0.05 significance level. Results: From September 2017 to September 2021, 435 pts were enrolled (arm A/B: 217/218) in 67 Italian sites. Main pts’ characteristics were (arm A/B): median age 59/59, ECOG PS 0 80%/84%, left-sided 88%/88%, synchronous metastases 88%/87%, prior adjuvant 2%/6%, resected primary 43%/51%, liver-only 37%/39%. Main grade > 2 adverse events were diarrhoea 7%/23%, stomatitis 7%/7%, neutropenia 20%/32%, febrile neutropenia 3%/6%, fatigue 2%/7%, skin rash 29%/19%. 160 (73%) out of 218 patients in arm B and 165 (76%) out of 217 patients in arm A achieved RECIST response (OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.56-1.34, p=0.526). No interaction effect between treatment arm and disease spread (liver-limited vs not-liver limited) was evident. No differences in early tumor shrinkage (arm A/B 58%/57%, p=0.878) and deepness of response (median arm A/B: 47%/48%, p=0.845) were reported, nor in R0 resection rate (arm A/B 29%/25%, p=0.317). At a median follow up of 26.5 mos, 305 (arm A/B: 157/148) PFS events were collected, with no significant difference between arms (median PFS: 12.7 vs 12.3 months, HR: 0.88, 95%CI 0.70-1.11, p=0.277). Conclusions: The intensification of the upfront chemotherapy backbone in combination with panitumumab in molecularly selected and mostly (88%) left-sided mCRC patients does not provide any benefit in terms of treatment activity at the price of a non-negligible increase in gastrointestinal toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT03231722.

e24015 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequent malignancy in patients (pts) aged 70. Elderly patients are often excluded by clinical trials; however, improvements in quality of life and comorbidities management led to expand the access to anticancer treatments irrespectively of age per se. Finding new tools to stratify vulnerability in elderly pts is crucial to guide clinicians in therapeutic decisions. G8 and timed up and go test (TUG) have been related to prognosis and functional decline in patients affected by several solid tumors. However, no studies focused on TUG and G8 prognostic value in CRC pts are available. In this study, we assessed the prognostic value of G8 and TUG in a cohort of real-life elderly pts with metastatic CRC (mCRC). Methods: GOLD was a multicentre, observational, prospective study in which pts aged 70 with mCRC and eligible to 1st line therapy were enrolled. G8 and TUG were performed at screening and at the first documented disease progression (PD). G8 cutoff was 14, as reported in literature; TUG8,5 sec (cutoff set with ROC curve using MedCalc software v 20.027). PFS and OS were described with Kaplan-Meyer curve. All analyzed variables were then compared with multivariate models. Primary endpoint of the study was to assess prognostic value of G8 in OS and PFS. Secondary endpoints were to assess prognostic value of TUG in OS and PFS. Results: Since Oct 2017 to Apr 2019, 109 pts were evaluated in 4 different Oncology Units in Veneto (IT); 4 were not eligible to anticancer treatments and where thus excluded. 105 pts were finally enrolled. Clinical, histological and molecular characteristics were well balanced between pts with G814 vs > 14, with the exception of RASmut, more represented in the G8 > 14 group (p = 0,0195). 39 (37%) pts were aged80; 46 (44%) had ECOG PS1; 55 (53%) had RASmut; 15 (15%) had BRAFmut. 81 (77%) had G814; 78 (75%) had TUG8,5. At a median follow up time of 41,2 months, median OS was 19,41 months (95%CI 15,46-23,19) and median PFS 8,78 months (95% CI 7,53-10,07). OS was longer in patients with G814 (HR 0,61; 95%CI 0,39-0,97; p= 0,0584) and TUG8,5 (HR 0,55; 95%CI 0,35- 0,86; p= 0,0201). PFS was not influenced by G8 (HR 0,86; 95%CI 0,55-1,34; p= 0,5125) nor by TUG (HR 0,71; 95%CI 0,47-1,08). G814 and TUG8,5 conferred better OS also in the subgroup of RASmut (respectively p= 0,0133 and p= 0,0088). Worse OS was observed in presence of > 1 metastatic site (HR = 1,71; 95%CI 1,11 to 2,64; p= 0,0161). At the multivariate analysis, G814 ( p= 0,0202) and single metastatic site ( p= 0,0200) were related to better OS; none of the analysed variables had effect on PFS. Conclusions: In our study G814 and TUG8,5 had prognostic value in OS, but not in PFS, in a real-life population of elderly pts affected by mCRC. G8 and single metastatic site involvement were related to better OS, irrespectively of other clinical, histological and molecular variables.

Low-dose tamoxifen halves recurrence in non-invasive breast cancer without significant adverse events. Some adjuvant trials with tamoxifen 20 mg/day had shown an association between low endoxifen levels (9–16 nM) and recurrence, but no association with CYP2D6 was shown in the NSABP P1 and P2 prevention trials. We studied the association of CYP2D6 genotype and tamoxifen metabolites with tumor biomarkers and recurrence in a randomized phase III trial of low-dose tamoxifen. Median (IQR) endoxifen levels at year 1 were 8.4 (5.3–11.4) in patients who recurred vs 7.5 (5.1–10.2) in those who did not recur (p = 0.60). Tamoxifen and metabolites significantly decreased C-reactive protein (CRP, p P = 0.03). In conclusion, endoxifen is below 9 nM in most subjects treated with 5 mg/day despite strong efficacy and there is no association with recurrence, suggesting that the reason for tamoxifen failure is not poor drug metabolism. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT01357772.

Summary Background There is a preclinical rationale for inhibiting angiogenesis in mesothelioma. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the anti-VEGFR-2 antibody ramucirumab combined with gemcitabine in patients with pretreated malignant pleural mesothelioma. Methods RAMES was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial done at 26 hospitals in Italy. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–2, and histologically proven malignant pleural mesothelioma progressing during or after first-line treatment with pemetrexed plus platinum. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks plus either intravenous placebo (gemcitabine plus placebo group) or ramucirumab 10 mg/kg (gemcitabine plus ramucirumab group) on day 1 every 3 weeks, until tumour progression or unacceptable toxicity. Central randomisation was done according to a minimisation algorithm method, associated with a random element using the following stratification factors: ECOG performance status, age, histology, and first-line time-to-progression. The primary endpoint was overall survival, measured from the date of randomisation to the date of death from any cause. Efficacy analyses were assessed in all patients who had been correctly randomised and received their allocated treatment, and safety analyses were assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of their assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03560973 , and with EudraCT, 2016-001132-36. Findings Between Dec 22, 2016, and July 30, 2018, of 165 patients enrolled 161 were correctly assigned and received either gemcitabine plus placebo (n=81) or gemcitabine plus ramucirumab (n=80). At database lock (March 8, 2020), with a median follow-up of 21·9 months (IQR 17·7–28·5), overall survival was longer in the ramucirumab group (HR 0·71, 70% CI 0·59–0·85; p=0·028). Median overall survival was 13·8 months (70% CI 12·7–14·4) in the gemcitabine plus ramucirumab group and 7·5 months (6·9–8·9) in the gemcitabine plus placebo group. Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 35 (44%) of 80 patients in the gemcitabine plus ramucirumab group and 24 (30%) of 81 in the gemcitabine plus placebo group. The most common treatment-related grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (16 [20%] for gemcitabine plus ramucirumab vs ten [12%] for gemcitabine plus placebo) and hypertension (five [6%] vs none). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in five (6%) in the gemcitabine plus ramucirumab group and in four (5%) patients in the gemcitabine plus placebo group; the most common was thromboembolism (three [4%] for gemcitabine plus ramucirumab vs two [2%] for gemcitabine plus placebo). There were no treatment-related deaths. Interpretation Ramucirumab plus gemcitabine significantly improved overall survival after first-line standard chemotherapy, with a favourable safety profile. This combination could be a new option in this setting. Funding Eli Lilly Italy. Translation For the Italian translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Summary Background The importance of lung recruitment before surfactant administration has been shown in animal studies. Well designed trials in preterm infants are absent. We aimed to examine whether the application of a recruitment manoeuvre just before surfactant administration, followed by rapid extubation (intubate-recruit-surfactant-extubate [IN-REC-SUR-E]), decreased the need for mechanical ventilation during the first 72 h of life compared with no recruitment manoeuvre (ie, intubate-surfactant-extubate [IN-SUR-E]). Methods We did a randomised, unblinded, controlled trial in 35 tertiary neonatal intensive care units in Italy. Spontaneously breathing extremely preterm neonates (24 + 0 to 27 + 6 weeks' gestation) reaching failure criteria for continuous positive airway pressure within the first 24 h of life were randomly assigned (1:1) with a minimisation algorithm to IN-REC-SUR-E or IN-SUR-E using an interactive web-based electronic system, stratified by clinical site and gestational age. The primary outcome was the need for mechanical ventilation in the first 72 h of life. Analyses were done in intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations, with a log-binomial regression model correcting for stratification factors to estimate adjusted relative risk (RR). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02482766 . Findings Of 556 infants assessed for eligibility, 218 infants were recruited from Nov 12, 2015, to Sept 23, 2018, and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The requirement for mechanical ventilation during the first 72 h of life was reduced in the IN-REC-SUR-E group (43 [40%] of 107) compared with the IN-SUR-E group (60 [54%] of 111; adjusted RR 0·75, 95% CI 0·57–0·98; p=0·037), with a number needed to treat of 7·2 (95% CI 3·7–135·0). The addition of the recruitment manoeuvre did not adversely affect the safety outcomes of in-hospital mortality (19 [19%] of 101 in the IN-REC-SUR-E group vs 37 [33%] of 111 in the IN-SUR-E group), pneumothorax (four [4%] of 101 vs seven [6%] of 111), or grade 3 or worse intraventricular haemorrhage (12 [12%] of 101 vs 17 [15%] of 111). Interpretation A lung recruitment manoeuvre just before surfactant administration improved the efficacy of surfactant treatment in extremely preterm neonates compared with the standard IN-SUR-E technique, without increasing the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. The reduced need for mechanical ventilation during the first 72 h of life might facilitate implementation of a non-invasive respiratory support strategy. Funding None.

Aim of our observational and retrospective study is to compare efficacy and indications of endoscopic full-thickness resection device (FTRD) with the over-the-scope (OVESCO) clip closure for en bloc resection of colorectal lesions (including adenomas, early carcinomas, inflammatory polyps and neuroendocrine tumors).This article collected 36 cases of colorectal neoplasms from a single Italian referral center per colorectal disease treatment. Primary endpoints included en bloc resection, R0 resection and an early discharge of the patient. Secondary endpoints included procedure-related adverse events.Mean procedure time± standard deviation (SD) was 19.6±22.1 minutes and mean hospital stay (± SD) was 2.2±1.1 days. Overall, an en bloc resection was achieved in 34 cases (94.4%), with an R0 resection rate of 91.6%. Among the three not R0 patients, further additional treatments were needed.Along the same line of other already published articles, the main current indications of EFTR by FTRD-OVESCO are limited to superficial or low-risk malignancy lesions (eg, adenomas, early cancers or subepithelial tumors), not suitable to conventional endoscopic resection or in patients with a severe surgical risk. Both en bloc resection rate and complication rate are aligned with other authors' data.EFTR by FTRD system represents an effective and safe options whenever a recurrent lesion in a challenging environment occurres (eg, recent scar, low rectum or beyond a large colonic bend). Procedure-related adverse events are potentially severe, so that this novel technique should be performed by "expert hands".Difficult polypectomies, Early carcinomas, Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection (EFTR), Full-Thickness Resection Device (FTRD) by Over-The-Scope (OVESCO) clip closure, Literature overview, Single center experience.La resezione di lesioni sessili del colon-retto, specialmente in siti considerati complessi (per esempio retto inferiore, a livello di austre coliche o su cicatrici di pregresse mucosectomie) costituisce un sfida per ciascun endoscopista. Considerando il constante incremento di incidenza delle neoplasie del colon retto nell’ultimo decennio, nuove metodiche di polipectomia sono state frutto della continua ricerca medica, fra cui, a partire dal 2015, la tecnica di Full-Thickness Resection Device (FTRD) basata sulla clip Over-The-Scope (OVESCO), nata da una brillante idea di Schurr MO 1,2,9,10. Pecularità di questo sistema innovativo è la capacità di realizzare, in un unico tempo (ossia “one-shot”) sia la resezione a tutto spessore della lesione target (garantendo pertanto un’alta percentuale di pazienti R0) sia la chiusura a tutto spessore della parete colica (o rettale) 9,11,15,17. Il kit FTRD consiste della specifica clip OVESCO modificata (al fine di poter afferrare a tutto spessore la parete colica o rettale), di una pinza con la funzione di sollevare la lesione target all’interno del cappuccio e, infine, di un’ansa annessa al sistema (che decorre esternamente lungo il tubo dell’endoscopio, avvolta da una guaina). Una volta che lesione è stata marcata circonferenzialmente e raggiunta con il sistema FTRD, la pinza viene fatta avanzare attraverso il canale operativo per poter afferrare le lesione e, congiuntamente ad una modesta aspirazione dell’endoscopio, includerla all’interno del cappuccio apposito (con dimensioni di 21 mm × 23 mm). Una volta ottenuta una valida duplicazione della parete colica (o rettale) la clip viene rilasciata mediante l’apposito mulinello (analogo a quella della OVESCO classica); immediatamente dopo, l’assistente provvede a chiudere l’ansa, così da poter resecare la lesione mediante un sistema di corrente monopolare (Video 1, Figs. 1, 2) 9,11. La casistica del nostro centro comprende 36 casi di lesioni colorettali, raccolte in 5 anni. La maggior parte delle lesioni sono adenomi rettali recidivi (dopo mucosectomie endoscopiche). I risultati ottenuti, in termini di resezione en bloc e di R0, sono molto incoraggianti, peraltro in perfetta linea e coerenza con quelli dei più importanti lavori europei pubblicati sinora su questo tema. L’analisi statistica dei dati raccolti ha fatto emergere percentuali di resezione en bloc ed R0 del 94.4% e 91.6%, rispettivamente, confermando l’efficacia e sicurezza di questa innovative tecnica per la resezione di lesioni complesse (“challenging”) del colon-retto, specie in pazienti ad alto rischio chirurgico. Anche le percentuali relative alle complicanze post procedurali sono confortanti, in linea, ancora una volta, con le maggiori pubblicazioni. In conclusione, alla luce del confronto fra la nostra casistica e la letteratura attuale, la resezione full-thickness basata sul sistema OVESCO, costituisce un’ottima alternativa alla resezione chirurgica di lesion polipoidi “difficili”, ovviamente se affidata a mani esperte. Dall’analisi della casistica, sottoposta a studio statistico con analisi univariata, non è emerso alcun valore di p con rilevanza statistica: questo dato, che potrebbe presentare varie chiavi di lettura, riteniamo sia fondamentalmente dovuto al numero piuttosto ristretto di casi ed al bassissimo numero di recidive (indice comunque dell’efficacia anche a lungo termine del trattamento con sistema FTRD).

IntroductionEarly treatment with caffeine in the delivery room has been proposed to decrease the need for mechanical ventilation (MV) by limiting episodes of apnoea and improving respiratory mechanics in preterm infants. Thus, the purpose of this feasibility study is to verify the hypothesis that intravenous or enteral administration of caffeine can be performed in the preterm infant in the delivery room.Methods and analysisIn this multicentre prospective study, infants with 25+0–29+6 weeks of gestational age will be enrolled and randomised to receive 20 mg/kg of caffeine citrate intravenously, via the umbilical vein, or enterally, through an orogastric tube, within 10 min of birth. Caffeine plasma level will be measured at 60±15 min after administration and 60±15 min before the next dose (5 mg/kg). The primary endpoint will be evaluation of the success rate of intravenous and enteral administration of caffeine in the delivery room. Secondary endpoints will be the comparison of success rate of intravenous versus oral administration and the evaluation of the need for MV in treated infants. In the absence of previous references, we arbitrarily decided to study 20 infants treated with intravenous caffeine and 20 infants treated with enteral caffeine. Primary endpoint will be evaluated measuring the success rate of intravenous and enteral caffeine administration which will be considered a success when it is followed by the achievement of the caffeine therapeutic level (8–25 µg/mL) 60±15 min before administration of the second dose.Ethics and disseminationThe study has been approved by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA: AIFA/RSC/P/32755) and by Comitato Etico Pediatrico Regione Toscana. The results will be published in peer-reviewed academic journals.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04044976; EudraCT number 2018-003626-91.

Introduction Few centers worldwide have large experience with performing an extended septal myectomy in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Therefore, many HCM patients eligible for surgical relief of left ventricular (LV) outflow gradient do not have access to treatment. In a previous study, cutting fibrotic anterior mitral leaflet secondary chordae, in association with only a shallow myectomy, proved highly effective in moving the mitral valve (MV) apparatus away from the LV outflow tract and relieving the outflow gradient in our HCM patients with mild hypertrophy ( Purpose To assess whether chordal cutting is equally effective in improving MV geometry and relieving LV outflow gradient and heart failure symptoms in HCM patients with more marked hypertrophy. Methods Surgical outcome and MV geometry and function were assessed in 226 consecutive HCM patients who underwent systematic cutting of fibrotic anterior mitral leaflet secondary chordae, in association with a shallow myectomy and independently of magnitude of septal thickness, at our center from January 2015 to December 2018. Results Of 226 study patients, 1 (0.4%) died perioperatively. None had iatrogenic septal defect. Postoperatively, LV outflow gradient at rest decreased from 70±36 to 10±2 mmHg (P Conclusions Our results show that cutting fibrotic anterior mitral leaflet secondary chordae, by moving the MV apparatus away from the LV outflow tract and independently of the magnitude of septal hypertrophy, contributes to improve the results of septal myectomy and reduces the need for a deep septal excision (and associated risk of iatrogenic septal defect) in patients with obstructive HCM. Therefore, chordal cutting could make the myectomy operation more accessible to surgeons, increasing the availability of surgical treatment for HCM patients eligible for invasive abolition of LV outflow obstruction. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Purpose: Low-dose tamoxifen halved recurrence after surgery in a phase III trial in breast noninvasive disease without increasing adverse events. We explored the effect of low-dose tamoxifen in clinically relevant subgroups, including menopausal status, estradiol levels, smoking, body mass index, and proliferation of baseline lesion. Patients and Methods: Incidence of invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ was the primary endpoint. HRs and interaction terms were estimated using Cox models. Results: A favorable HR and 95% confidence interval (CI) could be demonstrated for postmenopausal status (HR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11–0.82 vs. HR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.30–1.76 in premenopausal women; Pinteraction = 0.13), women with estradiol less than 15.8 pg/mL, presence of menopausal symptoms at baseline, and never smoking (Pinteraction = 0.07), although the interaction P value was >0.05 for all characteristics. Efficacy was similar in all body mass index categories. Tumors with Ki-67 above the median level of 10% had a greater benefit (HR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.09–0.81) than those with Ki-67 ≤10% (HR = 1.58; 95% CI, 0.45–5.60; Pinteraction = 0.04). Conclusions: The efficacy of low-dose tamoxifen seems to be greater in postmenopausal women and in women with lower estradiol levels. Benefits appear to be larger also in women with menopausal symptoms, never smokers, and tumors with Ki-67 >10%. Our results by menopausal status provide important insight into low-dose tamoxifen personalized treatment, although caution is necessary given their exploratory nature. Observation of an improved response in tumors with Ki-67 >10% is consistent but the use of the marker in this setting is investigational. See related commentary by Fabian, p. 3510

Introduction: Fluoroscopy guided Bronchoscopy is used for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs), but its performance is not optimal. Rapid On Site Examination (ROSE) of cytological samples allows real-time feedback of adequacy during a diagnostic exam. Little is known about whether ROSE can affect the diagnostic accuracy of bronchoscopy in diagnosing PPLs. Materials and Methods: Our retrospective study assessed the impact of ROSE on the yield of fluoroscopy guided trans-bronchial sampling for the diagnosis of PPLs in 160 patients referred to the Interventional Pulmonology of the University Hospital of Brescia (Italy) between August 2018 and July 2019. In 80 consecutive patients ROSE was not performed (NO-ROSE group up to January 2019). For the following 80 patients ROSE was systematically performed both for trans-bronchial needle aspiration and biopsies. Histology from surgical resection or follow up CT scan at 6 months were used as reference standard. Results: The accuracy of fluoroscopy guided bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of PPLs in the ROSE group is higher than in the NO-ROSE group (88%vs79%). Prevalence of malignancy was 81% in both groups. Sensitivity of bronchoscopy on lesions with bronchus sign was 87% in the ROSE group and 88% in the NO-ROSE group. PPLs were smaller in the ROSE group (30,2 ±14.0 vs 38.1±22.3 mm, p Conclusions: Our retrospective analysis suggests that ROSE may increase the diagnostic yield of fluoroscopy guided bronchoscopic sampling of PPLs.

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) reported remarkable achievements in several solid tumours. However, in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) promising results are limited to patients with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-high) tumours due to their immune-enriched microenvironment. Combining cytotoxic agents and bevacizumab in mCRC with proficient mismatch repair/microsatellite stability (pMMR/MSS) could make ICIs efficacious by increasing the exposure of neoantigens, especially with highly active chemotherapy regimens, inducing immunogenic cell death, increasing the tumoral infiltration of CD8+ T-cells and reducing tumour-associated myeloid-derived suppressor cells. VEGF-blockade also plays an immunomodulatory role by inhibiting the expansion of T regulatory lymphocytes.Consistently with this rationale, a phase Ib study combined the anti-PDL-1 atezolizumab with FOLFOX/bevacizumab as first-line treatment of mCRC, irrespective of microsatellite status, and reported interesting activity and efficacy results, without safety concerns.Phase III trials led to identify FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as an upfront therapeutic option in selected mCRC patients. Drawing from these considerations, the combination of atezolizumab with an intensified upfront treatment (FOLFOXIRI) and bevacizumab could be worthy of investigation.MethodsAtezoTRIBE is a prospective, open label, phase II, comparative trial in which initially unresectable and previously untreated mCRC patients, irrespective of microsatellite status, are randomized in a 1:2 ratio to receive up to 8 cycles of FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab alone or in combination with atezolizumab, followed by maintenance with bevacizumab plus 5-fluoruracil/leucovorin with or without atezolizumab according to treatment arm until disease progression. The primary endpoint is PFS. Assuming a median PFS of 12 months for standard arm, 201 patients should be randomized in a 1:2 ratio to detect a hazard ratio of 0.66 in favour of the experimental arm. A safety run-in phase including the first 6 patients enrolled in the FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab/atezolizumab arm was planned, and no unexpected adverse events or severe toxicities were highlighted by the Safety Monitoring Committee.DiscussionThe AtezoTRIBE study aims at assessing whether the addition of atezolizumab to an intensified chemotherapy plus bevacizumab might be an efficacious upfront strategy for the treatment of mCRC, irrespective of the microsatellite status.Trial registrationAtezoTRIBE is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03721653), October 26th, 2018 and at EUDRACT (2017–000977-35), Februray 28th, 2017.

Background Limited data are available regarding the use of nab-paclitaxel in older patients with breast cancer. A weekly schedule is recommended, but there is a paucity of evidence regarding the optimal dose. We evaluated the efficacy of two different doses of weekly nab-paclitaxel, with a specific focus on their corresponding impact on patient function, in order to address the lack of data specifically relating to the older population. Methods EFFECT is an open-label, phase II trial wherein 160 women with advanced breast cancer aged ≥ 65 years were enrolled from 15 institutions within Italy. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 (arm A) or 125 mg/m2 (arm B) on days 1, 8, and 15 on a 28-day cycle, as first-line treatment for advanced disease. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS), wherein an event was defined as disease progression (PD), functional decline (FD), or death. In each arm, the null hypothesis that the median EFS would be ≤ 7 months was tested against a one-sided alternative according to the Brookmeyer Crowley test. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results After a median follow-up of 32.6 months, 140 events were observed in 158 evaluable patients. Median EFS was 8.2 months (90% CI, 5.9–8.9; p = 0.188) in arm A vs 8.3 months (90% CI, 6.2–9.7, p = 0.078) in arm B. Progression-free survival, overall survival, and response rates were similar in both groups. A higher percentage of dose reductions and discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs) was noted in arm B. The most frequently reported non-haematological AEs were fatigue (grade [G] 2–3 toxicity occurrence in arm A vs B, 43% and 51%, respectively) and peripheral neuropathy (G2–3 arm A vs B, 19% and 38%, respectively). Conclusion Pre-specified outcomes were similar in both treatment arms. However, 100 mg/m2 was significantly better tolerated with fewer neurotoxicity-related events, representing a more feasible dose to be recommended for older patients with advanced disease. Trial registration EudraCT, 2012-002707-18. Registered on June 4, 2012. NIH ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02783222. Retrospectively registered on May 26, 2016.

Sperm DNA fragmentation (sDF) negatively affects reproduction and is traditionally detected in total sperm population including viable and non-viable spermatozoa. Here, we aimed at exploring the ability of DNA fragmentation to discriminate fertile and subfertile men when detected in viable (viable sDF), non-viable (non-viable sDF), and total spermatozoa (total sDF). We revealed sDF in 91 male partners of infertile couples and 71 fertile men (max 1 year from natural conception) with LiveTUNEL coupled to flow cytometry, able to reveal simultaneously DNA fragmentation and cell viability. We found that the three sDF parameters discriminated fertile and subfertile men with similar accuracy and independently from age and basal semen parameters: AUCs (area under the curves) (95% CI) were: 0.696 (0.615–0.776), p < 0.001 for total sDF; 0.718 (0.640–0.797), p < 0.001 for viable sDF; 0.760 (0.685–0.835), p < 0.001 for non-viable sDF. We also found that total and non-viable but not viable sDF significantly correlated to age and semen quality. In conclusion, the three sDF parameters similarly discriminated fertile and subfertile men. Viable spermatozoa with DNA fragmentation are likely cells able to fertilize the oocyte but failing to properly support subsequent embryo development. Non-viable sDF could be a sign of a subtler damage extended beyond the non-viable cells.

Background Despite sensitivity to first-line chemotherapy, most small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients relapse. In this setting, topotecan demonstrated modest activity with significant toxicity. Paclitaxel was also active. This study was designed to evaluate activity and safety of nab-paclitaxel in relapsed SCLC. Methods In this multicentre prospective Phase 2 trial, patients with refractory or sensitive SCLC progressed to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy received nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/smq on days 1, 8, 15 every 4 weeks up to six cycles, progressive disease or intolerable toxicity. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective tumour response. Secondary endpoints were toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Of the 68 patients treated, partial response was 8% in the refractory cohort and 14% in the sensitive cohort. Most common toxicities of any grade were fatigue (54%), anaemia (38%), neutropenia (29%), leukopenia (26%) and diarrhoea (21%). Median PFS was similar in both refractory (1.8 months) and sensitive cohorts (1.9 months), while median OS was longer in sensitive one (6.6 versus 3.6 months). Conclusions Although nab-paclitaxel has shown some modest anti-tumour activity in relapsed SCLC, associated with a favourable toxicity profile, the primary end-point of the study was not met. Clinical Trial registration Clinical Trial registration number is ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03219762.

Background Infertility affects 7%-12% of men, and its etiology is unknown in half of cases. To fill this gap, use of the male genital tract color-Doppler ultrasound (MGT-CDUS) has progressively expanded. However, MGT-CDUS still suffers from lack of standardization. Hence, the European Academy of Andrology (EAA) has promoted a multicenter study ("EAA ultrasound study") to assess MGT-CDUS characteristics of healthy, fertile men to obtain normative parameters. Objectives To report (a) the development and methodology of the "EAA ultrasound study," (b) the clinical characteristics of the cohort of healthy, fertile men, and (c) the correlations of both fertility history and seminal features with clinical parameters. Methods A cohort of 248 healthy, fertile men (35.3 +/- 5.9 years) was studied. All subjects were asked to undergo, within the same day, clinical, biochemical, and seminal evaluation and MGT-CDUS before and after ejaculation. Results The clinical, seminal, and biochemical characteristics of the cohort have been reported here. The seminal characteristics were consistent with those reported by the WHO (2010) for the 50th and 5th centiles for fertile men. Normozoospermia was observed in 79.6% of men, while normal sperm vitality was present in almost the entire sample. Time to pregnancy (TTP) was 3.0[1.0-6.0] months. TTP was negatively correlated with sperm vitality (Adj.r =-.310, P = .011), but not with other seminal, clinical, or biochemical parameters. Sperm vitality and normal morphology were positively associated with fT3 and fT4 levels, respectively (Adj.r = .244, P r = .232, P = .002). Sperm concentration and total count were negatively associated with FSH levels and positively, along with progressive motility, with mean testis volume (TV). Mean TV was 20.4 +/- 4.0 mL, and the lower reference values for right and left testes were 15.0 and 14.0 mL. Mean TV was negatively associated with gonadotropin levels and pulse pressure. Varicocoele was found in 33% of men. Conclusions The cohort studied confirms the WHO data for all semen parameters and represents a reference with which to assess MGT-CDUS normative parameters.

Background Doublets plus anti-epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) are the preferred upfront option for patients with left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Initial therapy with FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab is superior to doublets plus bevacizumab independently from primary tumor sidedness and RAS/BRAF status. No randomized comparison between FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab versus doublets plus anti-EGFRs is available in left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC. Materials and Methods We selected patients with left-sided RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC treated with first-line FOLFOX-panitumumab or FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab in five randomized trials: Valentino, TRIBE, TRIBE2, STEAM, and CHARTA. A propensity score-based analysis was performed to compare FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab with FOLFOX-panitumumab. Results A total of 185 patients received FOLFOX-panitumumab and 132 received FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 13.3 and 33.1 months in the FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab group compared with 11.4 and 30.3 months in the FOLFOX-panitumumab group (propensity score-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for PFS, 0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.64–1.04; p = .11; propensity score-adjusted HR for OS, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.59–1.08; p = .14). No significant differences in overall response rate and disease control rate were observed. A statistically nonsignificant difference in favor of FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab was observed for OS after secondary resection of metastases. Chemotherapy-related adverse events were more frequent in the FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab group, with specific regard to grade 3 and 4 neutropenia (48% vs. 26%, adjusted p = .001). Conclusion Although randomized comparison is lacking, both FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab and FOLFOX-panitumumab are valuable treatment options in left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC. Implications for Practice A propensity score-based analysis of five trials was performed to compare FOLFOX-panitumumab versus FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab in left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). No significant differences were observed, but FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab achieved numerically superior survival outcomes versus FOLFOX-panitumumab. Chemotherapy-related adverse events were more frequent in the FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab group. These observations suggest that although doublet chemotherapy plus anti-EGFRs remains the preferred treatment in patients with left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC, FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab is a valuable option able to provide similar, if not better, outcomes at the price of a moderate increase in toxicity and may be adopted based on patients’ preference and potential impact on quality of life.

T-cell receptor excision circles (TREC) and kappa-deleting recombination excision circles (KREC) assays have been used for severe combined immunodeficiencies newborn screening (NBS). We assessed TREC and KREC NBS values in preterm infants and investigated if perinatal characteristics affect their values.We performed a retrospective study collecting data from TREC and KREC NBS database and from mothers' and infants' medical charts.TREC and KREC values were lower in preterm infants born at 23-31 or 32-36 weeks of gestation than in term infants. Gestational age28 weeks of gestation, leukopenia, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy lowered TREC. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy lowered KREC and intrapartum fever38 °C increased it. Low TREC and KREC values were not associated to the risk of developing early-onset sepsis and late-onset sepsis.TREC and KREC levels are lower in preterm than term infants, but this did not increase the risk of neonatal sepsis.

Background The activity of palbociclib as a single agent in advanced breast cancer has not been extensively studied, with the only available clinical data limited to heavily pretreated patients. Preclinical data suggests palbociclib may partially reverse endocrine resistance, though this hypothesis has not been evaluated in previous clinical studies. This phase II, open-label, multicenter study examined the activity of palbociclib monotherapy, as well as palbociclib given in combination with the same endocrine therapy (ET) that was received prior to disease progression, in postmenopausal women with moderately pretreated, estrogen receptor-positive, HER2 negative advanced breast cancer. Patients and methods Eligible women with advanced disease which had progressed on one or two prior ETs were randomized 1 : 1 to receive either palbociclib alone, or palbociclib in combination with the ET as previously received. Primary end point was clinical benefit rate (CBR); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS). Results Between October 2012 and July 2016, a total of 115 patients were randomized. The CBR was 54% [95% confidence interval (CI): 41.5–63.7] for combination therapy, and 60% (95% CI: 47.8–72.9) for monotherapy. Median PFS was 10.8 months (95% CI: 5.6–12.7) for combination therapy, and 6.5 months (95% CI: 5.4–8.5) for monotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.69; 95% CI: 0.4–1.1, exploratory P-value = 0.12]. Exploratory analyses revealed the PFS advantage for combination therapy was seen in the subgroup of patients who received prior ET for >6 months (HR 0.53; 95% CI: 0.3–0.9, exploratory P-value = 0.02), but not in those who received prior ET for ≤6 months. Conclusion Palbociclib has clinical activity as a single agent in women with moderately pretreated, oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Palbociclib may have potential to reverse endocrine resistance in patients with a history of previous durable response to ET. Clinical trial information NCT02549430

Background. Surgical treatment is the cornerstone in the management of colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases. The aim of this study is to identify clinicopathological factors affecting disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing potentially curative liver resection for CRC metastasis. Methods. All consecutive patients undergoing liver resection for first recurrence of CRC from February 2006 to February 2018 were included. Prognostic impact of factors related to the patient, primary and metastatic tumors, was retrospectively tested through univariate and multivariate analyses. Results. Seventy patients were included in the study. Median postoperative follow-up was 37 months (range 1–119). Median DFS and OS were 15.2 and 62.7 months, and 5-year DFS and OS rates were 16% and 53%. In univariate analysis, timing of metastasis presentation/treatment (combined colorectal and liver resection, “bowel first” approach or metachronous presentation) (p<0.0001), ASA score (p=0.003), chemotherapy after liver surgery (p=0.028), T stage (p=0.021), number of resected liver lesions (p<0.0001), and liver margin status (p=0.032) was significantly associated with DFS while peritoneal resection at colorectal surgery (p=0.026), ASA score (p=0.036), extension of liver resection (p=0.024), chemotherapy after liver surgery (p=0.047), and positive nodes (p=0.018) with OS. In multivariate analysis, timing of metastasis presentation/treatment, ASA score, and chemotherapy (before and after liver surgery) resulted significantly associated with DFS and timing of metastasis presentation/treatment, positive nodes, peritoneal resection at colorectal surgery, and surgical approach (open or minimally invasive) of colorectal resection with OS. Conclusions. Surgery may provide good DFS and OS rates for CRC liver metastasis. Patient selection for surgery and correct timing of intervention within a multidisciplinary approach may be improved by taking into account negative prognostic factors which stress the importance of systemic therapy.

An early adequate antifungal therapy based on the knowledge of local epidemiology can reduce the candidemia-attributable mortality and the length of hospitalization. We performed a retrospective study to analyze the epidemiology of candidemia and the antifungal consumption in our hospital. We analyzed Candida spp. isolated from the blood, and their susceptibility profile from 2005 to 2016 in Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy. We also performed a stratified analysis by clinical setting where Candida spp. were isolated (Medical Wards, Surgery, Intensive Care Unit-ICU). Then, we retrospectively reviewed the annual consumption of antifungal agents and calculated the defined daily dosing for 10,000 hospital days. The rate of candidemia was higher in ICU than other settings and Candida albicans was the first cause of candidemia (61.2%). After adjustment for hospital days, the rate of C. albicans showed a statistically significant parabolic trend (p

Background Treatment with fluoropyrimidines and concomitant long-course external radiotherapy (RTE) is the standard of care in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) preoperative chemoradiation. A randomized phase II study (RaP/STAR-03) was conducted that aimed to evaluate the activity and safety of the monoclonal antibody anti-epidermal growth factor receptor panitumumab as a single agent in combination with radiotherapy in low-risk LARC preoperative treatment. Materials and Methods Patients had adenocarcinoma of the mid-low rectum, cT3N− or cT2–T3N+, KRAS wild-type status, and negative circumferential radial margin. Panitumumab was administered concomitant to RTE. Rectal surgery was performed 6–8 weeks after the end of preoperative treatment. The adjuvant chemotherapy regimen was FOLFOX. The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. The sample size was calculated using Simon's two-stage design. A pCR of 16% was considered to qualify the experimental treatment for further testing. Results Ninety-eight patients were enrolled in 13 Italian centers from October 2012 to October 2015. Three panitumumab infusions were administered in 92 (93.4%) patients. The RTE compliance was median dose 50.4 Gy; ≥28 fractions in 82 (83.7%) patients. Surgical treatment was performed in 92 (93.9%) patients, and no severe intraoperative complications were observed. A pCR was observed in 10 (10.9%) patients (95% confidence interval, 4.72%–17.07%). Pathological downstaging occurred in 45 (45.9%) patients. Grade 3 toxicities were observed in 22 (22.3%) patients, and the common adverse events were skin rash in 16 (16.3%) patients. No grade 4 toxicities were reported. Conclusion The pCR rate (our primary endpoint), at only 10.9%, did not reach the specified level considered suitable for further testing. However, the analysis showed a good toxicity profile and compliance to concomitant administration of panitumumab and RTE in preoperative treatment of LARC. The pCR evaluation in all wild-type RAS is ongoing. Implications for Practice The aim of the RaP/STAR-03 study was to evaluate the activity and safety of monoclonal antibody anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) panitumumab as a single agent without chemotherapy in low-risk, locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) preoperative treatment. Nevertheless, the use of panitumumab in combination with radiotherapy in preoperative treatment in patients with KRAS wild type and low-risk LARC did not reach the pathologic complete response primary endpoint. This study showed a good toxicity profile and compliance to combination treatment. Further analysis of NRAS and BRAF on tissue and circulating levels of the EGFR ligands and vascular factors (soluble vascular endothelial growth factor, E-selectin) may provide insight on the potential molecular pathways involved in the anti-EGFR response.

To evaluate surfactant effectiveness for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in late preterm infants.We performed a retrospective cohort study of infants born between 34We studied 562 infants with RDS, 252 (45%) were treated with surfactant and 310 (55%) were not. FiOSurfactant therapy was followed by a quick and persisting significant improvement of respiratory function in late preterm infants with RDS. Surfactant did not improve short-term outcomes in our population probably because other factors such as the gestational age, occurrence of complications and poor feeding play a relevant role.

Purpose Considering promising results in phase II studies, a randomized phase III trial was designed to assess the efficacy of adding bevacizumab to first-line cisplatin plus etoposide for treatment of extensive-disease (ED) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients and Methods Treatment-naive patients with ED-SCLC were randomly assigned to receive either cisplatin plus etoposide (arm A) or the same regimen with bevacizumab (arm B) for a maximum of six courses. In the absence of progression, patients in arm B continued bevacizumab alone until disease progression or for a maximum of 18 courses. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results Two hundred four patients were randomly assigned and considered in intent-to-treat analyses (103 patients in arm A and 101 patients in arm B). At a median follow-up of 34.9 months in arm A and arm B, median OS times were 8.9 and 9.8 months, and 1-year survival rates were 25% and 37% (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.06; P = .113), respectively. A statistically significant effect of bevacizumab on OS in patients who received maintenance was seen (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.91; P = .011). Median progression-free survival times were 5.7 and 6.7 months in arm A and arm B, respectively ( P = .030). Regarding hematologic toxicity, no statistically significant differences were observed; for nonhematologic toxicity, only hypertension was more frequent in arm B (grade 3 or 4, 1.0% v 6.3% in arms A v B, respectively; P = .057). Conclusion The addition of bevacizumab to cisplatin and etoposide in the first-line treatment of ED-SCLC had an acceptable toxicity profile and led to a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival, which, however, did not translate into a statistically significant increase in OS. Further research with novel antiangiogenic agents, particularly in the maintenance setting, is warranted.

Background: Different antiangiogenics are currently indicated in the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), following a first-line bevacizumab-containing treatment. The magnitude of benefit is limited, but no predictors of benefit have been identified. Methods: A total of 184 mCRC patients progressing to a first-line bevacizumab-containing treatment were randomised in the BEBYP study to continue or not the antiangiogenic in combination with a second-line chemotherapy. A subgroup analysis according to baseline serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels was carried out. Results: A significant interaction effect between LDH levels and treatment was found in terms of progression-free survival (PFS; P=0.002). Although patients with low LDH levels achieved significant PFS benefit from the continuation of bevacizumab (HR: 0.39 (95% CI: 0.23–0.65)), patients with high levels did not (HR: 1.10 (95% CI: 0.74–1.64)). Consistent results were reported in overall survival (OS; P=0.075). Conclusions: As preclinical evidence suggests that serum LDH may be a marker of tumour angiogenesis activation, low levels may indicate that bevacizumab is still efficacious in inhibiting angiogenesis. Validation of present results in subgroup analyses of other randomised trials of second-line angiogenesis inhibitors is warranted.

PURPOSE Tamoxifen administered for 5 years at 20 mg/d is effective in breast cancer treatment and prevention, but toxicity has limited its broad use. Biomarker trials showed that 5 mg/d is not inferior to 20 mg/d in decreasing breast cancer proliferation. We hypothesized that a lower dose given for a shorter period could be as effective in preventing recurrence from breast intraepithelial neoplasia but have a lower toxicity than the standard dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a multicenter randomized trial of tamoxifen, 5 mg/d or placebo administered for 3 years after surgery in women with hormone-sensitive or unknown breast intraepithelial neoplasia, including atypical ductal hyperplasia and lobular or ductal carcinoma in situ. The primary end point was the incidence of invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ. RESULTS Five hundred women 75 years of age or younger were included. After a median follow-up of 5.1 years (interquartile range, 3.9-6.3 years), there were 14 neoplastic events with tamoxifen and 28 with placebo (11.6 v 23.9 per 1,000 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.92; P = .02), which resulted in a 5-year number needed to treat of 22 (95% CI, 20 to 27). Tamoxifen decreased contralateral breast events by 75% (three v 12 events; hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.88; P = .02). Patient-reported outcomes were not different between arms except for a slight increase in frequency of daily hot flashes with tamoxifen ( P = .02). There were 12 serious adverse events with tamoxifen and 16 with placebo, including one deep vein thrombosis and one stage I endometrial cancer with tamoxifen and one pulmonary embolism with placebo. CONCLUSION Tamoxifen at 5 mg/d for 3 years can halve the recurrence of breast intraepithelial neoplasia with a limited toxicity, which provides a new treatment option in these disorders.

Background: Infants born at 23–24 weeks' gestation have the highest risk of developing a hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA), that is refractory to pharmacological closure requiring surgical ligation. Thus, these patients might have the greatest benefits from hsPDA closure, although previous studies on PDA closure were not focused on this population. Aim: To compare the occurrence of hsPDA, failure rate of the first course of ibuprofen in closing hsPDA, and need of surgical closure in infants born at 23+0–24+6 weeks' gestation to those in infants born at 25+0–28+6 weeks' gestation. Study design: This is a retrospective multicenter study including infants born at 23+0–28+6 weeks of gestation admitted to the neonatal care units from January 2013 to December 2017. All infants underwent echocardiographical assessment for hsPDA diagnosis and eventually pharmacological treatment, and surgical closure. Results: We studied a total of 842 infants of which 562 (67%) developed a PDA. Among those with PDA, 511 (91%) received a pharmacological treatment for a hsPDA. We found that a hsPDA occurred in 70% (106/151) of infants born at 23–24 weeks and in 59% (405/691) of infants born at 25–28 weeks of gestation (P < 0.001). Failure of closure with the first-treatment cycle (69 vs. 40%; P < 0.001) and need of surgical closure (19 vs 10%) were more frequent (P < 0.011) in infants born at 23–24 than 25–28 gestational weeks. Paracetamol vs. ibuprofen treatment and gestational age of 23–24 versus 25–28 weeks increased closure failure, while less severe RDS and maternal clinical chorioamnionitis decreased it. Conclusions: Among extremely preterm infants, infants born at 23–24 weeks of gestation have the highest risk of developing a hsPDA refractory to pharmacological treatment requiring surgical closure. Our findings support the need of individualized more careful strategies for hsPDA management in this special population.

Background: The triplet FOLFOXIRI (fluorouracil, L-leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) plus bevacizumab showed improved outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, when compared to FOLFIRI (fluorouracil, Lleucovorin, and irinotecan) plus bevacizumab. However, the actual benefit of the upfront exposure to the three cytotoxics when compared with a preplanned sequential strategy of doublets was not clear, as well as the feasibility and efficacy of therapies after progression. To this purpose, we aimed at comparing a pre-planned strategy of upfront FOLFOXIRI followed by the reintroduction of the same regimen after disease progression to a sequence of mFOLFOX6 (fluorouracil, L-leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) and FOLFIRI doublets, in combination with bevacizumab. Methods: TRIBE2 was an open-label, prospective, phase 3 randomised study of patients (aged 18-70 years with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status of 2 or less and aged 71-75 years with an ECOG performance status of 0), with unresectable, previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer, who were recruited from 58 Italian Oncology Units. Patients were stratified according to center, ECOG performance status, primary tumour location and previous adjuvant chemotherapy, and randomly assigned (1:1) via a web-based procedure to two different strategies: first-line mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab followed by FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab after disease progression (control group) or FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab followed by the reintroduction of the same regimen after disease progression (experimental group). Combination treatments were administered up to 8 cycles followed by fluorouracil/L-leucovorin plus bevacizumab maintenance until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events, or consent withdrawal. Both patients and investigators were aware of treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival 2, defined as the time from randomization to disease progression on any treatment given after first disease progression or death, analysed by intention to treat. Safety was assessed in the population of patients who received at least one dose of their assigned treatment. The study recruitment was completed, and follow-up of participants is still ongoing. Findings: Between February 26, 2015, and May 15, 2017, 679 patients were randomly assigned and received treatment (340 in the control group and 339 in the experimental group). 81% of enrolled patients had a right-sided and/or RAS or BRAF mutated tumour. At data cut-off (July 30, 2019) the median follow-up was 35·9 months (IQR 30·1-41·4). Median progression-free survival 2 was 19·2 months (95% CI 17·3-21·4) in the experimental group and 16·4 months (95% CI 15·1-17·5) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·74, 95% CI 0·63-0·88; p

516 Background: Current guidelines recommend GnRH agonist (GnRHa) use during chemotherapy (CT) as a strategy to reduce the risk of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer (EBC). However, no long-term safety data are available raising some concerns on concurrent use of GnRHa during CT in patients with hormone receptor-positive disease. In addition, there is no evidence on the protective role of this strategy in patients with germline BRCA mutations ( mBRCA). Here, we report the final analysis of the PROMISE-GIM6 phase III randomized study, the largest trial addressing the role of GnRHa use during CT in premenopausal EBC patients (Del Mastro et al, JAMA 2011 & Lambertini et al, JAMA 2015). Methods: From October 2003 to January 2008, 281 premenopausal patients aged 18 to 45 years with stage I-III EBC candidates for (neo)adjuvant CT were randomized to receive CT alone or combined with the GnRHa triptorelin. Primary endpoint was incidence of CT-induced POI (defined as amenorrhea and post-menopausal FSH/estradiol levels 1 year following CT). This final analysis reports on post-treatment pregnancies, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). An exploratory descriptive analysis in mBRCA patients is also reported. (ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT00311636) Results: Of the 281 randomized patients (CT+GnRHa arm = 148; CT alone arm = 133), 80% had hormone receptor-positive disease. At the time of this final analysis, 38 (13.5%) patients were lost to follow-up. Median follow-up was 12.4 years (IQR: 11.3-13.2 years). In the CT+GnRHa and CT alone arms, respectively, 9 (10-year cumulative incidence of pregnancy 6.5%, 95% CI 3.5%-12.3%) and 4 (10-year cumulative incidence of pregnancy 3.2%, 95% CI 1.2%-8.3%) patients had a post-treatment pregnancy (HR 2.14, 95% CI 0.66-6.92). No differences in 10-year DFS (72.4% in CT+GnRHa arm vs. 71.2% in CT alone arm: HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.76-1.77) nor in 10-year OS (82.0% in CT+GnRHa arm vs. 85.9% in CT alone arm: HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.67-2.03) were observed. There was no interaction between treatment effect and hormone receptor status. In patients with hormone receptor-positive disease, HR was 1.02 (95% CI 0.63-1.63) for DFS and 1.12 (95% CI 0.59-2.11) for OS. Out of 43 patients tested for BRCA, overall incidence of POI, irrespective of treatment arm, was 20% in mBRCA patients (n = 10) and 12% in patients without mBRCA (n = 33). In mBRCA patients, incidence of POI was 0% and 33% in the CT+GnRHa and CT alone arms, respectively. One post-treatment pregnancy was described in a patient with mBRCA1 in the CT alone arm. Conclusions: The final analysis of the PROMISE-GIM6 trial at a median follow-up of 12.4 years provides reassuring evidence on the safety of GnRHa use during CT as a strategy to preserve ovarian function in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive EBC. Clinical trial information: NCT00311636.

Despite sensitivity to first-line chemotherapy, most small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients relapse. In this setting, topotecan demonstrated modest activity with significant toxicity. Paclitaxel was also active. This study was designed to evaluate activity and safety of nab-paclitaxel in relapsed SCLC.In this multicentre prospective Phase 2 trial, patients with refractory or sensitive SCLC progressed to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy received nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/smq on days 1, 8, 15 every 4 weeks up to six cycles, progressive disease or intolerable toxicity. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective tumour response. Secondary endpoints were toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).Of the 68 patients treated, partial response was 8% in the refractory cohort and 14% in the sensitive cohort. Most common toxicities of any grade were fatigue (54%), anaemia (38%), neutropenia (29%), leukopenia (26%) and diarrhoea (21%). Median PFS was similar in both refractory (1.8 months) and sensitive cohorts (1.9 months), while median OS was longer in sensitive one (6.6 versus 3.6 months).Although nab-paclitaxel has shown some modest anti-tumour activity in relapsed SCLC, associated with a favourable toxicity profile, the primary end-point of the study was not met.Clinical Trial registration number is ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03219762.

Background The identification of early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) with high risk of progression is one major clinical challenge, mainly due to lack of validated biomarkers. The aims of the present study were to analyze the prognostic impact of three molecular markers belonging to the ion channels and transporters family: the ether-à-go-go-related gene 1 (hERG1) and the calcium-activated KCa3.1 potassium channels, as well as the glucose transporter 1 (Glut-1); and to define the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in conjunction with the abovementioned biomarkers, in a cohort of radically resected stage I–III CRC patients. Patients and methods The expressions of hERG1, KCa3.1, and Glut-1 were tested by immunohistochemistry on 162 surgical samples of nonmetastatic, stage I–III CRC patients. The median follow-up was 32 months. The association between biological markers, clinicopathological features, and survival outcomes was investigated by evaluating both disease-free survival and overall survival. Results Although no prognostic valence emerged for KCa3.1, evidence of a negative impact of hERG1 expression on survival outcomes was provided. On the contrary, Glut-1 expression had a positive impact. According to the results of the multivariate analysis, patients were stratified in four risk groups, based on TNM stage and hERG1/Glut-1 expression. After adjusting for adjuvant therapy, stage I and II, Glut-1-negative, and hERG1-positive patients showed the worst survival experience. Conclusion This study strongly indicates that the combination of hERG1 positivity and Glut-1 negativity behaves as a prognostic biomarker in radically resected CRC patients. This combination identifies a group of stage I and II CRC patients with a bad prognosis, even worse than that of stage III patients, regardless of adjuvant therapy accomplishment., Video abstract

STUDY QUESTION Is thyroid hormones (TH) evaluation of clinical value in the work-up of males of infertile couples? STUDY ANSWER Our results suggest that TH evaluation is not mandatory in the work-up of male infertility. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY A few previous studies performed on a limited series of subjects reported a negative impact of hyper- and hypo-thyroidism on semen volume, sperm concentration, progressive motility and normal morphology. No previous study has systematically evaluated associations between TH variation, semen parameters and ultrasound characteristics of the male genital tract. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION Cross-sectional analysis of a consecutive series of 172 subjects seeking medical care for couple infertility from September 2010 to November 2014. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Of the entire cohort, 163 men (age 38.9 ± 8.0 years) free of genetic abnormalities were studied. All subjects underwent a complete andrological and physical examination, biochemical and hormonal assessment, scrotal and transrectal colour-Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) and semen analysis (including seminal interleukin 8 levels, sIL-8) evaluation within the same day. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Among the patients studied, 145 (88.9%) showed euthyroidism, 6 (3.7%) subclinical hyper- and 12 (7.4%) subclinical hypo-thyroidism. No subjects showed overt hyper- or hypo-thyroidism. At univariate analysis, no associations among thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) or TH levels and sperm parameters were observed. Conversely, we observed positive associations among free triiodothyronine (fT3) and free thyroxine (fT4) levels, ejaculate volume and seminal fructose levels. In a multivariate model, after adjusting for confounders such as age, body mass index, smoking habit, sexual abstinence, calculated free testosterone, prolactin and sIL-8 levels, only the associations found for fT3 levels were confirmed. When CDUS features were investigated, using the same multivariate model, we found positive associations between fT3 levels and seminal vesicles (SV) volume, both before and after ejaculation (adj. r = 0.354 and adj. r = 0.318, both P < 0.0001), as well as with SV emptying (ΔSV volume; adj. r = 0.346, P < 0.0001) and echo-texture inhomogeneity. In addition, after adjusting for confounders, negative associations between fT4 levels and epididymal body and tail diameters were found. No significant associations between TSH or TH levels and CDUS features of other organs of the male genital tract, including testis and prostate, were found. Finally, when the features of subjects with euthyroidism, subclinical hypo- and hyper-thyroidism were compared, no significant differences in seminal or hormonal parameters were found. Conversely, evaluating CDUS parameters, subjects with subclinical hyperthyroidism showed a higher difference between the SV longitudinal diameters measured before and after ejaculation when compared with that of subclinical hypothyroid men, even after adjusting for confounders (P < 0.007). All the other male genital tract CDUS characteristics did not differ among groups. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION First, the number of patients investigated is relatively small and those with (subclinical) thyroid dysfunctions are an even smaller number; hence, it is therefore difficult to draw firm conclusions. Moreover, the present results are derived from patients consulting an Italian Andrology Clinic for couple infertility, and could have different characteristics from the male general population or from those males consulting general practitioners for reasons other than couple infertility. Finally, due to the cross-sectional nature of the study, neither a causality hypothesis nor mechanistic models can be inferred. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Although no associations between TH and sperm parameters were observed, present data support a positive effect of TH on SV size and a permissive role on the ejaculatory machinery, likely through an action on SV and epididymal contractility. This is the first study reporting such evidence. However, in contrast with the view that TH assessment is important for female fertility, our results do not support a systematic evaluation of thyroid function in males of infertile couples. How TH abnormalities impact male fertility needs to be addressed by further studies. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS No funding was received for the study. None of the authors have any conflict of interest to declare.

4002 Background: Data on first-line treatment efficacy in elderly patients are limited. Many analyses adopt a questionable cut-off of 65 years and specific evidence with anti-EGFRs is low. FOLFOX-panitumumab (pan) is an option for RAS wild-type (wt) untreated mCRC patients. Guidelines recommend considering fluoropyrimidine monotherapy as an option for elderly patients, but no randomized studies have ever explored the role of the combination with an anti-EGFR. Methods: This is a prospective, open-label, multicenter phase II randomized trial. Unresectable and previously untreated RAS- BRAF wt mCRC patients aged ≥70 were randomized to receive FOLFOX-pan (arm A), or 5FU/LV-pan (arm B) for up to 12 cycles followed by pan maintenance until PD. The primary EP was PFS in both arms. Stratification criteria were age (≤75 vs > 75 years), ECOG PS (0–1 vs 2) and geriatric assessment with G8 Score (≤14 vs > 14). In each treatment arm, the null hypothesis for median PFS was set at ≤6 months. Assuming an expected median PFS time ≥9.5 months with both experimental regimens, a sample size of 90 patients in each arm granted to the study a power of 90%, with a type I error rate equal to 5% (1-sided Brookmeyer-Crowley test) for rejecting the null hypothesis. No formal comparison between the two arms was planned. Results: From Jul 2016 to Apr 2019 a total of 394 patients were screened, 211 were deemed eligible for inclusion and 185 were randomized (92 arm A and 93 arm B). Main pts’ characteristics were (arm A/B): males 66%/61%; median age 77/77y; PS≥1 49%/55%; right colon 23%/21%; G8 > 14 31%/30%. At a median follow up of 20.5 mos, 135 (arm A/B: 64/71) PD events were collected. Median PFS was 9.6 (95% CI 8.8-10.9) in arm A with FOLFOX-pan and 9.1 (95% CI 7.7-9.9) in arm B with 5FU/LV-pan. Response rates were (arm A/B): 65%/57%. Grade 3-4 toxicities were (arm A/B): neutropenia 9.8%/1.1%; diarrhea 16.3%/1.1%; stomatitis 9.8%/4.4%; neurotoxicity 3.3%/0%; fatigue 6.5%/4.4%; skin rash 25%/24.2%, hypomagnesemia 3.3%/7.7%. Conclusions: Large prospective randomized studies in molecularly selected elderly mCRC are feasible with multicenter collaborative efforts. Primary EP was met in both treatment arms. 5FU/LV plus panitumumab for up to 12 cycles followed by panitumumab maintenance until PD might be a reasonable option in elderly mCRC patients with RAS/BRAF wt tumors deserving further investigations in phase III trials. Clinical trial information: NCT02904031 .

Background: In search of novel biomarkers of response to bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), we analyzed the expression and prognostic role of several proteins related to angiogenesis. Methods: A retrospective, multicenter study on 80 surgical samples from mCRC patients treated in first line with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy was accomplished. The following proteins were analyzed by immunohistochemistry: hERG1 potassium channel, β1-integrin, pAKT, NFkB, HIF-1α, HIF-2α, p53, VEGF-A, GLUT-1, and CA-IX. Data were analyzed in conjunction with the clinicopathological characteristics of the patients, KRAS status, response to bevacizumab, and follow-up. Results: (1) All the proteins were expressed in the samples, with statistically significant associations between HIF-1α and gender, HIF-2α and left colon, hERG1 and VEGF-A, β1-integrin and HIF-2α, GLUT-1 and both HIF-1α and HIF-2α, and CA-IX and VEGF-A. (2) At the univariate analysis, positivity for hERG1, VEGF-A, and the active form of HIF-2α (aHIF-2α), and the G3 histological grade showed a positive impact on progression-free survival (PFS). (3) hERG1 and aHIF-2α maintained their positive impact on PFS at the multivariate analysis. (4) hERG1 behaved as a protective factor for PFS independently on KRAS status. Conclusions: hERG1 and aHIF-2α might help to identify patients who would benefit from bevacizumab treatment.

Background: Preterm newborns receiving briefly delayed cord clamping or cord milking at birth have better neonatal outcomes. However, the time frame in which both these procedures are performed (< 60 s of life) is too short to explore the possible beneficial effects on early infant postnatal adaptation and outcomes of a prolonged transfusion strategy associated with neonatal respiration. Methods and Design: We have designed a randomized, multicenter, controlled two-phase study: phase 1 to assess the feasibility of carrying out the protocol in a large randomized trial, and phase 2 to assess the efficacy of bedside assistance with intact placental circulation for 3 min in comparison to cord milking to improve outcome in the neonatal period; we present here the feasibility and safety phase of the study. Outcomes included feasibility (recruitment rate of two patients per month, compliance with the trial interventions, completeness of data collection, >90% of infants receiving echographic assessments in the first 24 h) and safety variables (5 min Apgar score, delivery room intubation rate, CRIB II score, admission temperature, maximum hemoglobin concentration and hematocrit in the first 24 h and maximum serum bilirubin value) in the two study groups. We also evaluated the same safety variables in infants delivered during the study period but not recruited. Results: A total of 40 infants were enrolled. In all cases the protocol was completed and all feasibility outcomes were reached. Infants assisted with an intact placental circulation have a higher 5 min Apgar score but their admission temperature was lower than milked infants. Delivery room intubation rate, CRIB II score and peak serum bilirubin value were comparable in both groups. Infants who were not subjected to a placental transfusion strategy (excluded patients) had a higher delivery room intubation rate with respect to both study groups. Conclusion: Delaying cord clamping until 3 min of life was challenging but feasible and appeared to be safe. However, admission temperature must be strictly monitored and a more efficacious warming system could be implemented to prevent hypothermia during the procedure. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials,gov {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT02671305","term_id":"NCT02671305"}}NCT02671305 (date of registration: 26 JAN 2016). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/{"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT02671305","term_id":"NCT02671305"}}NCT02671305