Back to Search Start Over

EFFECT: A randomized phase II study of efficacy and impact on function of two doses of nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment in older women with advanced breast cancer

Authors :
Antonella Brunello
Silvana Leo
Emanuela Magnolfi
Sabino De Placido
Raffaella Palumbo
Alessandro Marco Minisini
Elena Rota Caremoli
Elena Zafarana
Sara Donati
Emanuela Risi
Anna Rachelle Mislang
Giuseppe Mottino
Luca Boni
Dimitri Becheri
Rossana Berardi
Mirco Pistelli
Fabio Puglisi
Amelia McCartney
Rebecca Pedersini
Laura Biganzoli
Veronica Parolin
Simon Spazzapan
Giuseppina Sanna
Saverio Cinieri
Marco Colleoni
Laura Orlando
Biganzoli, Laura
Cinieri, Saverio
Berardi, Rossana
Pedersini, Rebecca
Mccartney, Amelia
Minisini, Alessandro Marco
Caremoli, Elena Rota
Spazzapan, Simon
Magnolfi, Emanuela
Brunello, Antonella
Risi, Emanuela
Palumbo, Raffaella
Leo, Silvana
Colleoni, Marco
Donati, Sara
De Placido, Sabino
Orlando, Laura
Pistelli, Mirco
Parolin, Veronica
Mislang, Anna
Becheri, Dimitri
Puglisi, Fabio
Sanna, Giuseppina
Zafarana, Elena
Boni, Luca
Mottino, Giuseppe
Source :
Breast Cancer Research, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2020), Breast Cancer Research : BCR
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Research Square Platform LLC, 2020.

Abstract

Background Limited data are available regarding the use of nab-paclitaxel in older patients with breast cancer. A weekly schedule is recommended, but there is a paucity of evidence regarding the optimal dose. We evaluated the efficacy of two different doses of weekly nab-paclitaxel, with a specific focus on their corresponding impact on patient function, in order to address the lack of data specifically relating to the older population. Methods EFFECT is an open-label, phase II trial wherein 160 women with advanced breast cancer aged ≥ 65 years were enrolled from 15 institutions within Italy. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 (arm A) or 125 mg/m2 (arm B) on days 1, 8, and 15 on a 28-day cycle, as first-line treatment for advanced disease. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS), wherein an event was defined as disease progression (PD), functional decline (FD), or death. In each arm, the null hypothesis that the median EFS would be ≤ 7 months was tested against a one-sided alternative according to the Brookmeyer Crowley test. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results After a median follow-up of 32.6 months, 140 events were observed in 158 evaluable patients. Median EFS was 8.2 months (90% CI, 5.9–8.9; p = 0.188) in arm A vs 8.3 months (90% CI, 6.2–9.7, p = 0.078) in arm B. Progression-free survival, overall survival, and response rates were similar in both groups. A higher percentage of dose reductions and discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs) was noted in arm B. The most frequently reported non-haematological AEs were fatigue (grade [G] 2–3 toxicity occurrence in arm A vs B, 43% and 51%, respectively) and peripheral neuropathy (G2–3 arm A vs B, 19% and 38%, respectively). Conclusion Pre-specified outcomes were similar in both treatment arms. However, 100 mg/m2 was significantly better tolerated with fewer neurotoxicity-related events, representing a more feasible dose to be recommended for older patients with advanced disease. Trial registration EudraCT, 2012-002707-18. Registered on June 4, 2012. NIH ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02783222. Retrospectively registered on May 26, 2016.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Breast Cancer Research, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2020), Breast Cancer Research : BCR
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....85c65ffcfc6b483a7d1fa90e217262a5