Search

International audience; In situ normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) and ex situ normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) aim to improve the outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) using controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD). NRP and NMP have not yet been compared directly. In this international observational study, outcomes of LT performed between 2015 and 2019 for organs procured from cDCD donors subjected to NRP or NMP commenced at the donor center were compared using propensity score matching (PSM). Of the 224 cDCD donations in the NRP cohort that proceeded to asystole, 193 livers were procured, resulting in 157 transplants. In the NMP cohort, perfusion was commenced in all 40 cases and resulted in 34 transplants (use rates: 70% vs. 85% [p = 0.052], respectively). After PSM, 34 NMP liver recipients were matched with 68 NRP liver recipients. The two cohorts were similar for donor functional warm ischemia time (21 min after NRP vs. 20 min after NMP; p = 0.17), UK-Donation After Circulatory Death risk score (5 vs. 5 points; p = 0.38), and laboratory Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores (12 vs. 12 points; p = 0.83). The incidence of nonanastomotic biliary strictures (1.5% vs. 2.9%; p > 0.99), early allograft dysfunction (20.6% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.13), and 30-day graft loss (4.4% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.40) were similar, although peak posttransplant aspartate aminotransferase levels were higher in the NRP cohort (872 vs. 344 IU/L; p < 0.001). NRP livers were more frequently allocated to recipients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; 60.3% vs. 20.6%; p < 0.001). HCC-censored 2-year graft and patient survival rates were 91.5% versus 88.2% (p = 0.52) and 97.9% versus 94.1% (p = 0.25) after NRP and NMP, respectively. Both perfusion techniques achieved similar outcomes and appeared to match benchmarks expected for donation after brain death livers. This study may inform the design of a definitive trial.

International audience; Background Laparoscopy is nowadays considered as the standard approach for hepatic left lateral sectionectomy (LLS), but its value in the prevention of incisional hernia (IH) has not been demonstrated. Methods Between 2012 and 2017, patients undergoing laparoscopic (LLLS) or open LLS (OLLS) in 8 centers were compared. Patients undergoing a simultaneous major abdominal procedure were excluded. The incidence of IH was assessed clinically and morphologically on computed tomography (CT) using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and multivariable regression analysis. Results After IPTW, 84 LLLS were compared to 48 OLLS. Compared to OLLS, LLLS patients had reduced blood loss (100 [IQR: 50-200] ml vs. 150 [IQR: 50-415] ml,p = 0.023) and shorter median hospital stay (5 [IQR: 4-7] days vs. 7 [6-9] days,p < 0.001), but experienced similar rate of postoperative complications (mean comprehensive complication index: 12 +/- 19 after OLLS versus 13 +/- 20 after LLLS,p = 0.968). Long-term radiological screening was performed with a median follow-up of 27.4 (12.1-44.9) months. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of clinically relevant IH (10.7% [n = 9] after LLLS, 8.3% [n = 4] after OLLS,p = 0.768). The rate of IH detected on computed tomography was lower after LLLS than after OLLS (11.9% [n = 10] versus 29.2% [n = 14],p = 0.013). On multivariable analysis, the laparoscopic approach was the only independent factor influencing the risk of morphological IH (OR = 0.290 [95% CI: 0.094-0.891],p = 0.031). The 2 preferential sites for specimen extraction after LLLS were Pfannenstiel and midline incisions, with rates of IH across the extraction site of 2.3% [n = 1/44] and 23.8% [n = 5/21], respectively (p = 0.011). Conclusion The laparoscopic approach for LLS decreases the risk of long-term IH as evidenced on morphological examinations, with limited clinical impact. Pfannenstiel's incision should be preferred to midline incision for specimen extraction after LLLS.

The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of liver surface nodularity (LSN) and sarcopenia from preoperative computed tomography (CT) in patients with resectable metabolic syndrome (MS)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Patients with MS undergoing hepatectomy for HCC between 2006 and 2018 at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. LSN and sarcopenia were assessed on preoperative CT scans, and their association with severe (Clavien-Dindo grade 3-5) postoperative complications was analyzed on multivariate analysis. The influence of LSN and sarcopenia on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was assessed.Overall, 110 patients (92 men [84%], mean 67.7 ± 7.7 years of age) were analyzed. Severe postoperative complications occurred in 34/110 (31%) patients. Patients with severe complications had a significantly higher LSN score (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.68 ± 0.05, optimal cut-off 2.50) and were more frequently sarcopenic (47% vs. 13% without major complications, p 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified sarcopenia (odds ratio [OR] 6.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.08-20.39; p 0.001), LSN 2.50 (OR 7.05, 95% CI 2.13-23.35; p 0.001), and preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE; OR 6.06, 95% CI 1.71-21.48; p = 0.005) as independent predictors of severe complications. LSN and sarcopenia had no influence on OS. Stratification according to a combination of LSN 2.50 and sarcopenia predicted the risk of severe postoperative complications from 7% (no sarcopenia and LSN ≤2.50) to 71% (sarcopenia and LSN 2.50; p 0.001), as well as RFS from 61 months (95% CI 40-82) to 17 months (95% CI 9-25; p = 0.033). Results remained significant in 52 patients without advanced fibrosis.The combination of LSN and sarcopenia derived from routine preoperative CT seems to help predict severe postoperative complications and stratification of RFS in patients with MS and resectable HCC.

BACKGROUND: Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) is an aggressive operation for treatment of advanced bile duct and gallbladder cancer associated with high perioperative morbidity and mortality, and uncertain oncological benefit in terms of survival. Few reports on HPD from Western centers exist. The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy for HPD in European centers.METHOD: Members of the European-African HepatoPancreatoBiliary Association were invited to report all consecutive patients operated with HPD for bile duct or gallbladder cancer between January 2003 and January 2018. The patient and tumor characteristics, perioperative and survival outcomes were analyzed.RESULTS: In total, 66 patients from 19 European centers were included in the analysis. 90-day mortality rate was 17% and 13% for bile duct and gallbladder cancer respectively. All factors predictive of perioperative mortality were patient and disease-specific. The three-year overall survival excluding 90-day mortality was 80% for bile duct and 30% for gallbladder cancer (P = 0.013). In multivariable analysis R0-resection had a significant impact on overall survival.CONCLUSION: HPD, although being associated with substantial perioperative mortality, can offer a survival benefit in patient subgroups with bile duct cancer and gallbladder cancer. To achieve negative resection margins is paramount for an improved survival outcome.

The liver hanging maneuver (LHM) was described by Belghiti et al. to facilitate liver resection and is done classically by creating a space between the caudate lobe and the inferior vena cava starting on the edge of caudate lobe and extending cranially, in a para-caval fashion, towards the space between the right and middle hepatic veins. LHM facilitates liver transection, guides anatomical resections, decreases blood loss, facilitates harvesting of the liver graft in live donors, and also has oncological advantages. We describe a new approach named “up-to-down” to perform LHM in open and laparoscopic liver resections. This approach was mainly used in obese patients, in laparoscopic liver resections and in cases of failure of the classic approach. The advantages/disadvantages, complications, and different modalities of LHM are also summarized. The peritoneal layer between the liver capsule and the infrahepatic vena cava is opened, and a short blind dissection is initiated on the right anterolateral aspect of the inferior vena cava to the left of the hepatic vein of segment VI. The suprahepatic vena cava is exposed, and the space between the right and middle hepatic veins and the vena cava is created by gentle dissection. A 16-Fr nasogastric tube is positioned in the space between the right and middle hepatic vein, pointing inferiorly, and pushed downwards, in a para-caval manner caudally until it is seen inferiorly. The results of this approach are given. LHM facilitates liver resection, and many variations have been described worldwide in open and laparoscopic liver surgery. The up-to-down approach should be part of the surgical armamentarium in order to offer a safer way to achieve LHM in some patients.

With the development of chemotherapy regimens, targeted therapies, and hepatic surgery, the survival of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has dramatically improved. Imaging plays a central role for the diagnosis, staging, and treatment allocation in these patients. To interpret CRLM on imaging, radiologists must be familiar with the main imaging features of untreated tumors as well as the modifications induced by systemic therapies, and their meaning in relation to pathological tumor response and tumor biology. CRLM have the same histological features as the primary tumor. Most are “non-otherwise specified” (NOS) adenocarcinomas. The mucinous tumor is the most common of the rare subtypes. In NOS tumors, imaging usually differentiates central areas of necrosis from peripheral proliferating tumors and desmoplastic reaction. Areas of mucin mixed with fibrosis are seen in mucinous subtypes to help differentiate the metastases from other tumors cysts or hemangiomas. After treatment, the viable tumor is gradually replaced by ischemic-like necrosis and fibrosis, and remnants cells are mainly located on the periphery of tumors. Imaging can help predict the degree of tumor response, but changes can be difficult to differentiate from the pretherapeutic appearance. When chemotherapy is interrupted or in case of resistance to treatment, a peripheral infiltrating halo of tumor growth may appear. The purpose of the article is to illustrate the significance of the imaging features of colorectal liver metastases during systemic therapy, using radiopathological correlations.

Introduction Among various reported techniques for inferior vena cava (IVC) reconstruction, the superiority of one technique over another has not been clearly established. This study aimed at reporting the technical aspects of caval reconstruction using peritoneal patch during extended liver resections. Methods All consecutive patients who underwent extended liver resection associated with anterolateral caval reconstruction using a peritoneal patch from 2016 to 2019 were included in this study. Technical insights, intra-operative details, short and long-term results were reported. Results Overall six patients underwent caval reconstruction using peritoneal patch under total vascular exclusion. Half of them required veno-venous bypass. Caval involvement ranged from 30 to 50% of the circumference and from 5 to 7 cm of the length of the IVC. Caval reconstructions was performed using a peritoneal patch harvested from the falciform ligament in four cases and from the right pre-renal peritoneum and right part of the diaphragm in one Case each. Three cases underwent associated reimplantation the remnant hepatic vein. Median intra-operative blood loss and TVE duration were 500 ml and 41 min, respectively. One case experienced a severe complication (liver failure leading to death). R0 resection was achieved in all patients. All patients had patent IVC and remnant hepatic vein at last follow-up and none was on long-term therapeutic anticoagulation. Conclusion Caval reconstruction using a peritoneal patch in patients undergoing extended liver resection is feasible and cost-effective and associated with excellent long-term results.

Resume La prevalence du syndrome metabolique (SM) a atteint le taux endemique de 25 % en Europe. La steatopathie hepatique non alcoolique ou non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) est la manifestation hepatique du SM. Sa definition est histologique et regroupe l’ensemble des lesions liees a la steatose hepatique (depots lipidiques dans plus de 5 % des hepatocytes) en l’absence de consommation d’alcool et apres elimination des autres causes. Le SM et la NAFLD sont impliques dans la carcinogenese du carcinome hepatocellulaire (CHC) et du cholangiocarcinome intra-hepatique (CCI). A l’heure actuelle, le CHC et le CCI sur SM representent respectivement 15–20 % et 20–30 % des indications de resection hepatique pour CHC et CCI. Par ailleurs la NAFLD tend a devenir la premiere indication de transplantation hepatique dans les pays industrialises. Les malades ayant un SM cumulent le risque operatoire lie a leur terrain et celui lie a la presence et/ou la gravite de leur NAFLD. Apres resection hepatique pour CHC et CCI sur SM, les taux de complications severes varient de 20 a 30 %. La mortalite post-transplantation est plus elevee, du fait de complications cardio-vasculaires et infectieuses. Le terrain a risque des malades ayant un SM requiert une prise en charge adaptee comportant notamment : i) une caracterisation precise du foie sous-jacent ; ii) une prise en charge ciblee sur le terrain de ces malades, avec une detection et une optimisation du traitement des facteurs de risque cardiovasculaire ; iii) une strategie chirurgicale adaptee a l’histologie du foie sous-jacent incluant une optimisation du volume du futur foie restant.

In Europe, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) has reached the endemic rate of 25%. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the hepatic manifestation of MS. Its definition is histological, bringing together the different lesions associated with hepatic steatosis (fat deposits on more than 5% of hepatocytes) without alcohol consumption and following exclusion of other causes. MS and NAFLD are implicated in the carcinogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). At present, HCC and ICC involving MS represent 15-20% and 20-30% respectively of indications for hepatic resection in HCC and ICC. Moreover, in the industrialized nations NAFLD is tending to become the most frequent indication for liver transplantation. MS patients combine the operative risk associated with their general condition and comorbidities and the risk associated with the presence and/or severity of NAFLD. Following hepatic resection in cases of HCC and ICC complicating MS, the morbidity rate ranges from 20 to 30%, and due to cardiovascular and infectious complications, post-transplantation mortality is heightened. The operative risk incurred by MS patients necessitates appropriate management including: (i) precise characterization of the subjacent liver; (ii) an accurately targeted approach privileging detection and optimization of treatment taking into account the relevant cardiovascular risk factors; (iii) a surgical strategy adapted to the histology of the underlying liver, with optimization of the volume of the remaining (postoperative) liver.

Background Quantification of liver surface nodularity (LSN) on routine preoperative CT images allows detection of cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension. This study aimed to assess the relevance of LSN in preoperative assessment of operative risks for patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods All patients undergoing hepatectomy for HCC between 2012 and 2017 were analysed retrospectively. LSN was assessed at the liver–fat interface on the left liver lobe on preoperative CT images. The feasibility of LSN quantification was assessed. The association between LSN and outcomes (severe complications and posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF)) was evaluated by multivariable analysis and after propensity score matching. Results Among 210 patients, LSN measurement was successful in 187 (89·0 per cent). Among these, the median LSN score was 2·42 (i.q.r. 2·21–2·66) and 52·9 per cent had severe fibrosis, including 33·7 per cent with cirrhosis. LSN score increased with hepatic venous pressure gradient (P = 0·048), severity of steatosis (P = 0·011) and fibrosis grade (P = 0·001). LSN score was independently associated with severe complications (odds ratio (OR) 5·25; P = 0·006) and PHLF (OR 6·78; P = 0·003). After matching with respect to model for end-stage liver disease, aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index and fibrosis-4 score, patients with a LSN score of 2·63 or higher retained an increased risk of PHLF (OR 5·81; P = 0·018). In the subgroup of patients without severe fibrosis, LSN was accurate in predicting severe complications (P = 0·005). Patients with (P = 0·039) or without (P = 0·018) severe fibrosis with increased LSN score had a higher comprehensive complication index score. Among patients with cirrhosis who had clinically significant portal hypertension, a LSN value below 2·63 ruled out the risk of PHLF. Conclusion LSN measurement represents a practical tool that may allow improvement in the preoperative evaluation and management of patients with HCC.

Objective Evaluating the perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive (MIV) donor hepatectomy for adult live donor liver transplants in a large multi-institutional series from both Eastern and Western centers. Background Laparoscopic liver resection has become standard practice for minor resections in selected patients in whom it provides reduced postoperative morbidity and faster rehabilitation. Laparoscopic approaches in living donor hepatectomy for transplantation, however, remain controversial because of safety concerns. Following the recommendation of the Jury of the Morioka consensus conference to address this, a retrospective study was designed to assess the early postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic donor hepatectomy. The collective experience of 10 mature transplant teams from Eastern and Western countries was reviewed. Methods All centers provided data from prospectively maintained databases. Only left and right hepatectomies performed using a MIV technique were included in this study. Primary outcome was the occurrence of complications using the Clavien-Dindo graded classification and the Comprehensive Complication Index during the first 3 months. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for complications. Results In all, 412 MIV donor hepatectomies were recorded including 164 left and 248 right hepatectomies. Surgical technique was either pure laparoscopy in 175 cases or hybrid approach in 237. Conversion into standard laparotomy was necessary in 17 donors (4.1%). None of the donors died. Also, 108 experienced 121 complications including 9.4% of severe (Clavien-Dindo 3-4) complications. Median Comprehensive Complication Index was 5.2. Conclusions This study shows favorable early postoperative outcomes in more than 400 MIV donor hepatectomy from 10 experienced centers. These results are comparable to those of benchmarking series of open standard donor hepatectomy.

Background Lymphadenectomy ensures accurate staging for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, especially for those without preoperatively suspected positive lymph nodes (clinically node-negative); however, its prognostic value has been poorly documented. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of lymphadenectomy on long-term outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for clinically node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Methods Data from all patients who underwent liver resection with or without lymphadenectomy for preoperatively diagnosed intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma between 2000 and 2016 at 3 tertiary hepatobiliary centers were analyzed retrospectively. Propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio was conducted based on clinically relevant covariates between patients with clinically node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who underwent liver resection with (LND group) and without (NLND group) lymphadenectomy. Overall survival and disease-free survival were compared in the matched cohort. Results Among 350 patients who underwent surgery during the study period, 192 (55%) with clinically node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma met the inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching, 2 well-balanced groups of 56 patients each were analyzed. There was no significant difference regarding postoperative variables among these 112 matched patients. Patients who underwent a liver resection with lymphadenectomy achieved better 3- and 5-year overall survival (78% and 65% vs 52% and 46%, P = .017) and disease-free survival (46% and 34% vs 31% and 31%; P = .042) compared with patients who underwent liver resection without lymphadenectomy. Conclusion Lymphadenectomy can be associated with better long-term outcomes in patients with node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Our data may support routine lymphadenectomy for node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with the objective of achieving better long-term outcomes.

Long-term outcomes after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) have been poorly studied. We aim to determine the outcomes after multibipolar RFA in these patients compared to other aetiologies as well as the prognostic impact of metabolic syndrome (MS).Patients who underwent multibipolar RFA as the first treatment for HCC within Milan criteria (2008-2018) were enrolled in this multicentre retrospective cohort from four tertiary centres in France. The association of MS and NAFLD with adverse events and outcomes after percutaneous RFA were assessed using Kaplan Meier method, log-rank test and uni/multivariate analysis with the Cox models.Among 520 patients, 390 patients (75%) had at least one component of MS including obesity (30%) and 95% had cirrhosis. Sixty-two patients (12.6%) had NAFLD-HCC, 225 (45.5%) had alcohol-related-HCC, 36 (7.3%) had HBV-HCC and 171 (34.6%) had HCV-HCC. Patients with NAFLD-HCC were significantly older (median age 72.6 years, P .001), more obese (median BMI 30.3 kg/mPercutaneous multibipolar RFA is an efficient treatment in HCC patients with NAFLD or metabolic syndrome and achieved similar long-term oncological outcomes compared to other aetiologies.

Background & Aims The histopathological subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are associated with distinct clinical features and prognoses. This study aims to report Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS)-defined imaging features of different HCC subtypes in a cohort of resected tumours and to assess the influence of HCC subtypes on computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) LI-RADS categorisation in the subgroup of high-risk patients. Methods This retrospective institutional review board-approved study included patients with resected HCCs and available histopathological classification. Three radiologists independently reviewed preoperative CT and MRI exams. The readers evaluated the presence of imaging features according to LI-RADS v2018 definitions and provided a LI-RADS category in patients at high risk of HCC. Differences in LI-RADS features and categorisations were assessed for not otherwise specified (NOS-HCC), steatohepatitic (SH-HCC), and macrotrabecular-massive (MTM-HCC) types of HCCs. Results Two hundred and seventy-seven patients (median age 64.0 years, 215 [77.6%] men) were analysed, which involved 295 HCCs. There were 197 (66.7%) NOS-HCCs, 62 (21.0%) SH-HCCs, 23 (7.8%) MTM-HCCs, and 13 (4.5%) other rare subtypes. The following features were more frequent in MTM-HCC: elevated α-foetoprotein serum levels (p, Graphical abstract, Highlights • The distribution of the major features and categories of LI-RADS is not different among the HCC histological subtypes. • MTM-HCC was associated with TIV, ≥1 LR-M feature, infiltrative appearance, necrosis or severe ischaemia, and larger size. • Steatohepatitis-related HCC was associated with fat in mass on CT and on MRI.

Background Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a rare but dreaded complication. The aim was to test whether a combination of non-invasive biomarkers (NIBs) and CT data could predict the risk of PHLF in patients who underwent resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods Patients with HCC who had liver resection between 2012 and 2020 were included. A relevant combination of NIBs (NIB model) to model PHLF risk was identified using a doubly robust estimator (inverse probability weighting combined with logistic regression). The adjustment variables were body surface area, ASA fitness grade, male sex, future liver remnant (FLR) ratio, difficulty of liver resection, and blood loss. The reference invasive biomarker (IB) model comprised a combination of pathological analysis of the underlying liver and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement. Various NIB and IB models for prediction of PHLF were fitted and compared. NIB model performances were validated externally. Areas under the curve (AUCs) were corrected using bootstrapping. Results Overall 323 patients were included. The doubly robust estimator showed that hepatitis C infection (odds ratio (OR) 4.33, 95 per cent c.i. 1.29 to 9.20; P = 0.001), MELD score (OR 1.26, 1.04 to 1.66; P = 0.001), fibrosis-4 score (OR 1.36, 1.06 to 1.85; P = 0.001), liver surface nodularity score (OR 1.55, 1.28 to 4.29; P = 0.031), and FLR volume ratio (OR 0.99, 0.97 to 1.00; P = 0.014) were associated with PHLF. Their combination (NIB model) was fitted externally (2-centre cohort, 165 patients) to model PHLF risk (AUC 0.867). Among 129 of 323 patients who underwent preoperative HVPG measurement, NIB and IB models had similar performances (AUC 0.753 versus 0.732; P = 0.940). A well calibrated nomogram was drawn based on the NIB model (AUC 0.740). The risk of grade B/C PHLF could be ruled out in patients with a cumulative score of less than 160 points. Conclusion The NIB model provides reliable preoperative evaluation with performance at least similar to that of invasive methods for PHLF risk prediction.

Summary Introduction The French Society of Gastro-Intestinal Surgery (Societe Francaise de Chirurgie Digestive) and the Association of hepato-bilio-pancreatic and transplantation surgery (Association de Chirurgie Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatique et Transplantation) requested that clinical practice recommendations be established with regard to operating room hygiene. Methods The literature was analyzed according to the High Authority of Health (Haute Autorite de sante [HAS]) methodology and after consultation of the Cochrane and Medline databases. Pertinent references were selected, and supplementary references were hand-picked from the reference lists. Only English or French language papers were retained. The recommendations of learned societies and the World Health Organization were also considered. Results Recommendations were proposed with regard to pre-operative patient preparation, skin preparation, draping, wound edge protectors, surgeon hygiene, wound closure, and operating room environment. Conclusion These clinical practice recommendations should guide and improve the daily practice of gastro-intestinal surgeons.

Resume Introduction La Societe Francaise de Chirurgie Digestive et l’Association de Chirurgie Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatique et Transplantation ont souhaite realiser des recommandations pour la pratique clinique concernant l’hygiene au bloc operatoire. Methodes L’analyse de la litterature a ete effectuee selon la methodologie de la Haute Autorite de Sante (HAS), par consultation des bases de donnees Cochrane et Medline. Une selection manuelle a ete effectuee a partir des references ainsi obtenues. Un tri manuel des references listees dans les articles selectionnes a ete fait a la recherche d’articles pertinents supplementaires. La recherche etait limitee aux articles dont la langue de publication etait l’anglais ou le francais. Les recommandations des principales societes savantes et de l’Organisation Mondiale de la Sante ont egalement ete prises en compte. Sur la base de l’analyse de la litterature, le groupe de travail a propose, chaque fois que possible, des recommandations. Resultats Des recommandations ont ete proposees concernant la preparation preoperatoire du patient, la preparation cutanee, le drapage chirurgical, les dispositifs de protection de la paroi abdominale, l’hygiene du chirurgien, la fermeture parietale, et l’environnement au bloc operatoire. Conclusion Ces recommandations pour la pratique clinique pourront permettre de guider et d’ameliorer la pratique quotidienne des chirurgiens digestifs.

BACKGROUND Liver transplantation (LT) for polycystic liver disease (PLD) is rare, extremely challenging and hemorrhagic, without standard approach. Moreover, LT for PLD presents the highest mortality rate (12% to 18%) among all causes of LT. In this setting, the combination of difficult mobilization of a heavy polycystic native liver with narrow access to inferior vena cava and fragile venous wall may lead to venous tearing and cataclysmic bleeding during dissection. The aim of this study was to evaluate a modified technique of total hepatectomy to limit hazardous liver manipulation and improve exposure of inferior vena cava in patients with massive hepatomegaly related to PLD: the exposure left lateral sectionectomy (ELLS). METHODS From 2011 to 2018, ELLS was performed during LT for PLD. Key technical points for safe and fast ELLS include avoidance of left triangular ligament section and placement of a tape behind the left lateral section allowing its ascension and prior dissection of the hepatic pedicle to limit bleeding. The transection plane is mainly composed of cysts, with limited parenchyma, which allows for rapid and bloodless transection using electric scalpel. RESULTS Fifteen patients had ELLS with no postoperative death or intraoperative complication. Median ELLS duration was 16 minutes, and no massive bleeding occurred during this step. During total hepatectomy, median blood loss was 500 mL, and no patient required total caval clamping. All patients were alive at the end of the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS ELLS during LT for PLD facilitates total hepatectomy with vena cava and caval flow preservation.

A standardized laparoscopic right hepatectomy (LRH) approach named the “caudal approach” was recently reported. Yet, the value of this approach compared with state-of-the-art open right hepatectomy (ORH) remains unknown. The purpose of this study was therefore to compare the short-term outcomes of LRH using the caudal approach and ORH with anterior approach and liver hanging maneuver. One-hundred eleven consecutive patients who underwent LRH with caudal approach were prospectively collected; 346 patients who underwent ORH with anterior approach and liver hanging maneuver were enrolled as a control group. Propensity score matching (PSM) of patients in a ratio of 1: 1 was conducted and the perioperative outcomes were compared. After PSM, two well-balanced groups of 72 patients each were analyzed and compared. The conversion rate in the LRH group was 18.1%. Perioperative blood loss and transfusion rates were significantly lower in the LRH group as compared to the ORH group (median, 200 ml vs. 500 ml, p

While the metabolic syndrome (MS) is being recognized as an important risk factor for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), the outcomes of liver resection in this context remain poorly described. This study aims to report the short- and long-term results of hepatectomy for patients with MS as risk factor for the development of ICC (MS+). All patients undergoing hepatectomy for ICC between 2000 and 2016 at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The perioperative outcomes of MS+ and ICC patients without MS (MS−) were compared. Among 115 resected ICC patients, 40 (34.8%) were MS+ and 75 (65.2%) were MS−. MS+ exhibited an increased Charlson comorbidity index (5 ± 2 vs. 2 ± 2, p

The average age of liver transplant donors and recipients has increased over the years. Independent of the cause of liver disease, older candidates have more comorbidities, higher waitlist mortality and higher post-transplant mortality than younger patients. However, transplant benefit may be similar in older and younger recipients, provided older recipients are carefully selected. The cohort of elderly patients transplanted decades ago is also increasingly raising issues concerning long-term exposure to immunosuppression and aging of the transplanted liver. Excellent results can be achieved with elderly donors and there is virtually no upper age limit for donors after brain death liver transplantation. The issue is how to optimise selection, procurement and matching to ensure good results with elderly donors. The impact of old donor age is more pronounced in younger recipients and patients with a high model for end-stage liver disease score. Age matching between the donor and the recipient should be incorporated into allocation policies with a multistep approach. However, age matching may vary depending on the objectives of different allocation policies. In addition, age matching must be revisited in the era of direct-acting antivirals. More restrictive limits have been adopted in donation after circulatory death. Perfusion machines which are currently under investigation may help expand these limits. In living donor liver transplantation, donor age limit is essentially guided by morbidity related to procurement. In this review we summarise changing trends in recipient and donor age. We discuss the implications of older age donors and recipients. We also consider different options for age matching in liver transplantation that could improve outcomes.

Resume But Decrire la prise en charge des traumatismes hepatiques fermes (THF) et etudier la relation entre les complications, le type de mecanisme et les lesions observees. Patients et methodes Etude retrospective monocentrique de 116 patients consecutifs entre 2007 et 2015. Resultats Un saignement actif a ete identifie au scanner chez 33 (28 %) patients. Le grade AAST (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma) etait inferieur ou egal a trois chez 82 (71 %) patients, et egal a cinq chez 15 (13 %) des patients. Quatre-vingts (69 %) patients ont eu une prise en charge non operatoire, avec un taux de succes de 96 %. La prise en charge initiale chirurgicale etait plus frequente en cas de lesions associees d’autres organes. Un scanner de controle a permis d’identifier 46 complications hepatiques et extra-hepatiques chez 80 patients, meme en l’absence d’anomalies cliniques ou biologiques. Quinze patients ont presente des complications hepatiques ulterieures (saignement, pseudo anevrysme, biliome, peritonite biliaire), associees a la severite du traumatisme hepatique initial selon la classification AAST (3,7 ± 1,0 vs. 3,0 ± 1,1, p = 0,010). Les complications biliaires (13 patients) etaient plus frequentes en cas de lesion des segments I, IV et IX (69 % vs. 36 %, p = 0,033). Conclusion La prise en charge non operatoire des THF est possible, avec un taux succes de 96 %. Un scanner de controle systematique est preconise lors du suivi, plus particulierement pour les lesions avec un grade AAST superieur ou egal a trois. Des complications biliaires doivent etre suspectees en cas d’atteinte des segments I, IV et IX.

Hemorrhage is the main complication of hepatocellular adenoma (HCA). The aim of this study was to describe a single center's evolving management of patients with hemorrhagic HCA.Between 1990 and 2013, all patients with hemorrhagic HCA were included. During the study period, the management evolved from urgent surgery (period2004) to arterial embolization with (period, 2004-2010) or without (period 2010) delayed resection.A total of 56 patients were identified. The median (range) size of HCA and the hematoma was 80 mm (35-160) and 50 mm (10-160). Patients were treated by urgent resection (group 1, n = 6), delayed resection with or without embolization (group 2, n = 43) and systematic embolization without surgery (group 3, n = 7). Embolization was performed in 0/6, 15/43 and 7/7 in groups 1, 2 and 3. Urgent resection was associated with higher morbidity (p 0.001). Complete necrosis was observed in 0/6, 13/43 and 3/7 patients, and on histology it was associated with embolization (p = 0.001), a hematoma-tumor ratio 60% (p = 0.046) and a cystic non-viable lesion before surgery (p 0.001).Hemodynamic stability can be achieved in patients presenting with hemorrhagic HCA by none surgical means. Subsequent surgery can be completely avoided with such an approach in up to 40% of patients.

Purpose To determine whether quantification of liver surface nodularity (LSN) provides an estimate of the presence of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in patients with cirrhosis. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included a training cohort (n = 189) and separate external validation cohort (n = 78), both composed of patients with cirrhosis who underwent abdominal CT and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement between 2010 and 2016. The LSN score, liver and spleen volumes, liver-to-spleen volume ratio, platelet count to spleen diameter ratio, Iranmanesh score, aspartate amino transferase-to-platelet ratio index, and Fibrosis-4 index were derived from CT images and serum laboratories. The accuracy of the various tests for predicting CSPH was evaluated with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and compared by using the DeLong test. Student t test and Pearson correlation coefficient were used. Results One hundred eighty-nine patients were analyzed (119 men [mean age ± standard deviation, 57 years ± 11; range, 29-81 years] and 70 women [mean age, 61 years ± 10; range, 34-83 years]; overall mean age, 58 years ± 10; range, 29-83 years). A total of 102 patients (54%) had CSPH. LSN score correlated with HVPG (r = 0.75; P < .001). Patients with CSPH had a higher LSN score than did those without CSPH (3.2 ± 0.6 vs 2.4 ± 0.3; P < .001). A cutoff value of 2.8 had a positive predictive value of 88% for CSPH; the AUROC of LSN was 0.88 ± 0.03. This was higher than that of other available noninvasive tests (DeLong, all P < .001). In the validation cohort, LSN score of 2.8 had a positive predictive value of 86% for CSPH; the AUROC was 0.87 ± 0.04. Conclusion The CT-based liver surface nodularity score demonstrated high diagnostic performance for detecting clinically significant portal hypertension and outperformed multiple other noninvasive tests. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

The goal of this study was to assess the relationship between liver surface nodularity (LSN), chemotherapy-associated liver injury (CALI), and clinically relevant post-hepatectomy liver failure (CR-PHLF) (i.e., ≥ grade B) in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Preoperative CT scans of patients who underwent chemotherapy followed by hepatectomy for CLM between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. LSN was measured using semi-automated CT software CT images in patients who had available preoperative CT scans within 6 weeks before hepatectomy, and was computed based on the means of one to 10 measurements by two abdominal radiologists consensually. The association of LSN, CALI, and CR-PHLF was analyzed. Two hundred fifty-six patients were analyzed (149 men and 107 women; overall median age, 61 [range, 29–88 years]). A total of 26 patients (10.2%) developed CR-PHLF. The optimal LSN cut-off value for detecting CR-PHLF was 2.5, as determined by receiver operative characteristic analysis (p 6 cycles, p = 0.018), but not with CALIs. After propensity score matching, LSN remained significantly associated with CR-PHLF (p = 0.031). Furthermore, multivariate analysis identified LSN ≥ 2.50 and future liver remnant (FLR) < 30% as significant preoperative predictors of CR-PHLF in 102 patients undergoing major hepatectomy. LSN ≥ 2.50 was more frequent in patients undergoing major hepatectomy despite FLR ≥ 30% (p = 0.008). LSN quantified on CT is an independent surrogate of CR-PHLF in patients who undergo chemotherapy followed by hepatectomy for CLM and may provide a valuable additional tool in the preoperative assessment of these patients. • LSN was not associated with chemotherapy- associated liver injury but high LSN (defined ≥ 2.5) was associated with prolonged chemotherapy (> 6 cycles). • High LSN was an independent predictor of clinically relevant postoperative liver failure in patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM. • LSN ≥ 2.50 was more frequent in patients with PHLF after major hepatectomy despite a future liver remnant ≥ 30%.

International audience; Hepatocholangiocarcinoma, fibrolamellar carcinoma, hepatic haemangioendothelioma and hepatic angiosarcoma represent less than 5% of primary liver cancers. Fibrolamellar carcinoma and hepatic haemangioendothelioma are driven by unique somatic genetic alterations (DNAJB1-PRKCA and CAMTA1-WWTR1 fusions, respectively), while the pathogenesis of hepatocholangiocarcinoma remains more complex, as suggested by its histological diversity. Histology is the gold standard for diagnosis, which remains challenging even in an expert centre because of the low incidences of these liver cancers. Resection, when feasible, is the cornerstone of treatment, together with liver transplantation for hepatic haemangioendothelioma. The role of locoregional therapies and systemic treatments remains poorly studied. In this review, we aim to describe the recent advances in terms of diagnosis and clinical management of these rare primary liver cancers.

Background Patients affected by HCC represent a vulnerable population during the COVID-19 pandemic and may suffer from the unusual allocation of healthcare resources. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of HCC patients within six French referral centers of the metropolitan area of Paris. Materials and methods We performed a multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional study on the management of patients affected by HCC during the first six weeks of COVID-19 pandemic (exposed), compared to the same period in 2019 (unexposed). Were included all patients discussed in multidisciplinary tumor meeting (MTB) and/or undergoing radiological or surgical programmed procedure during the study period, in a curative or palliative intent. Endpoints were the number of patients with a modification in the treatment strategy, or a delay in decision-to-treatment. Results After screening, n=670 patients were included (n=293 Exposed to COVID, n=377 Unexposed to COVID). A decrease of the numbers of patients with HCC presented in MTB in 2020 (p=0.034) and with a first diagnosis of HCC (n=104 Exposed to COVID, n=143 Unexposed to COVID, p=0.083) was find. Modification in the treatment strategy was observed in 13.1% of patients, with no differences between the two periods. Nevertheless 21.5% versus 9.5% of patients experienced a treatment delay longer than 1 month in 2020 compared to 2019 (p, Graphical abstract, Highlights • In COVID period, a decrease of the numbers of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma presented in Multidisciplinary Tumour Board and, in particular, with a first diagnosis of HCC was find. • Globally, modification in the treatment strategy was observed in 13.1% of patients, with no differences between the two periods but the main reason was significantly different in 2020 compared to 2019: COVID-19 in 2020 vs tumour progression in 2019. • More than 21% of patients experienced a treatment delay longer than 1 month in COVID period compared to 9.5% in 2019 , specially, in subgroup with active, recurrent HCC. The main reasons for the delay of treatment in 2020 was COVID-19 infection related • In 2020, 7.1% of patients had a diagnosis of an active COVID-19 infection and 4/21 (19.1%) died., During COVID pandemic era, less patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been presented in multidisciplinary tumor bord, specially with a first diagnosis of HCC

Background This study aimed to identify a subgroup of recipients at low risk of haemorrhage, bile leakage and ascites following liver transplantation (LT). Methods Factors associated with significant postoperative ascites (more than 10 ml/kg on postoperative day 5), bile leakage and haemorrhage after LT were identified using three separate multivariable analyses in patients who had LT in 2010–2019. A model predicting the absence of all three outcomes was created and validated internally using bootstrap procedure. Results Overall, 944 recipients underwent LT. Rates of ascites, bile leakage and haemorrhage were 34.9, 7.7 and 6.0 per cent respectively. The 90-day mortality rate was 7.0 per cent. Partial liver graft (relative risk (RR) 1.31; P = 0.021), intraoperative ascites (more than 10 ml/kg suctioned after laparotomy) (RR 2.05; P = 0.001), malnutrition (RR 1.27; P = 0.006), portal vein thrombosis (RR 1.56; P = 0.024) and intraoperative blood loss greater than 1000 ml (RR 1.39; P = 0.003) were independently associated with postoperative ascites and/or bile leak and/or haemorrhage, and were introduced in the model. The model was well calibrated and predicted the absence of all three outcomes with an area under the curve of 0.76 (P = 0.001). Of the 944 patients, 218 (23.1 per cent) fulfilled the five criteria of the model, and 9.6 per cent experienced postoperative ascites (RR 0.22; P = 0.001), 1.8 per cent haemorrhage (RR 0.21; P = 0.033), 4.1 per cent bile leak (RR 0.54; P = 0.048), 40.4 per cent severe complications (RR 0.70; P = 0.001) and 1.4 per cent 90-day mortality (RR 0.13; P = 0.004). Conclusion A practical model has been provided to identify patients at low risk of ascites, bile leakage and haemorrhage after LT; these patients could potentially qualify for inclusion in non-abdominal drainage protocols., This study has provided a practical model to identify patients at low risk of postoperative ascites, bile leakage and haemorrhage after liver transplantation. According to the model, fulfilment of its five criteria predicted the absence of all three outcomes with a relative risk of 1.74 (95 per cent c.i. 1.53 to 1.98; P = 0.001). These recipients, identified as having a low risk, could potentially qualify for inclusion in non-abdominal drainage protocols. A possible model to avoid drains

The ISGPF postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) definition using amylase drain concentration is widely used. However, the interest of lipase drain concentration, daily drain output and absolute enzyme daily production (concentration x daily drain volume) have been poorly investigated.These predictive on postoperative day (POD) 1, 3, 5 and 7 were analyzed in a development cohort, and subsequently tested in an independent validation cohort.Of the 227 patients of the development cohort, 17% developed a biochemical fistula and 34% a POPF (Grade B/C). Strong correlation was found between amylase/lipase drain concentration at all postoperative days (ρ = 0.90; p = 0.001). Amylase and lipase were both significantly higher in patients with a POPF (p 0.001) presenting an equivalent under the ROC curve area (0.85 vs 0.84; p = 0.466). Combining POD1 and POD3 threefold enzyme cut-off value increased significantly POPF prediction sensibility (97.4% vs 77.8%) and NPV (97.1% vs 86.3%). These results were also confirmed in the validation cohort of 554 patients. Finally, absolute enzyme daily production and daily drain output were significantly higher in patients with a POPF (p 0.001) but did not add clinical value when compared to drain enzyme concentration.Lipase is as effective as amylase drain concentration to define POPF. Absolute enzyme daily production or daily drain output do not help to better predict clinically significant POPF occurrence and severity. Lipase and amylase should mainly be used for their negative predictive value to predict the absence of clinically significant POPF and could allow early drain removal and hospital discharge.

Background & Aims The quality of surgical care of patients with HCC is associated with improved long-term prognosis and may also be influenced by the type of surgical approach. The present study aimed at evaluating the role of the laparoscopic approach on quality of surgical care and long-term prognosis in optimal HCC surgical candidates. Methods All consecutive patients undergoing open (OLR) or laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for early-stage HCC in cirrhosis (METAVIR F4) at 5 French expert hepato-pancreatico-biliary centres between 2010 and 2018 were enrolled. Quality of surgical care was defined by textbook outcome (TO), a combination of 6 criteria representing ideal hospitalisation. Factors associated with TO were determined on multivariate analysis. Comparison between LLR and OLR was performed after propensity score matching (PSM). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Statistical cure was modelled using a non-mixture model. Results Overall, 425 patients were included. Median follow-up was 42.0 months. LLR was performed in 267 (62.8%) patients. TO was achieved in 140 (32.9%) patients. LLR was independently associated with TO (odds ratio [OR] 2.81; 95% CI 1.29–6.12; p = 0.009). After PSM, LLR patients cumulated higher number of TO criteria than OLR patients (5 vs. 4; p = 0.012). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS of LLR patients with and without TO were 82.3%, 64.4%, and 62.5%, and 76.9%, 51.4%, and 30.2%, respectively (p = 0.003). On multivariable Cox regression, TO was independently associated with improved DFS (hazard ratio 0.34; p = 0.001). The cure fraction of the whole population was 24.4%. Patients achieving TO had increased cure fraction than patients not achieving TO (32.6% vs. 18.1%). Conclusions Quality of surgical care improves the prognosis of patients with early-stage HCC and is promoted by the laparoscopic approach. Lay summary The overall quality of surgical care, as measured by TO, plays a pivotal role in the prognosis and, in particular, on the probability of statistical cure of patients with resectable early-stage HCC occurring in cirrhosis. By influencing TO, laparoscopy has an indirect impact on the probability of cure and long-term management of these patients. This study strongly supports the promising curative role of mini-invasive treatments for early-stage HCC, such as low-difficulty LLR., Graphical abstract, Highlights • Homogeneous population of 425 resected patients with early-stage HCC in cirrhosis. • Textbook outcome following liver resection was achieved in 32.9% of patients. • The minimal invasive approach increases the chance of achieving a textbook outcome. • Textbook outcome following liver resection improves DFS and probability of cure. • Minimal invasive treatments of early HCC have a promising curative effect.

The prolonged life expectancy and increase in aging of the population have led surgeons to propose hepatectomy in the elderly population. In this study, we evaluate the surgical outcome of octogenarians in a single French center. Between 2000 and 2020, 78 patients over 80 years old were retrospectively analyzed. The risk factors of major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade IIIa) and patient performance after surgery by using textbook outcome (TO) (no surgical complications, no prolonged hospital stay (≤ 15 days), no readmission ≤90 days after discharge, and no mortality ≤90 days after surgery) were studied. The main surgical indication was for malignancy (96%), including mainly colorectal liver metastases (n = 41; 53%) and hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 22; 28%), and major hepatectomy was performed in 28 patients (36%). There were 6 (8%) postoperative mortalities. The most frequent complications were pulmonary (n = 22; 32%), followed by renal insufficiency (n = 22; 28%) and delirium (n = 16; 21%). Major complications occurred in 19 (24%) patients. On multivariate analysis, the main risk factors for major complications were the median vascular clamping time (0 vs 35; P = 0.04) and male sex (P = 0.046). TO was ultimately achieved in 30 patients (38%), and there was no prognostic factor for achievement of TO. Hepatectomy in octogenarians is associated with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Meanwhile, prolonged hepatic pedicle clamping should be avoided especially if hepatectomy is planned in a male patient.

Background & Aims We compare the performance of liver surface nodularity (LSN) and liver stiffness measurements (LSM) using transient elastography (TE) for the detection of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods All patients with cirrhosis and HCC who underwent computed tomography, LSM and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements within 30 days between 2015 and 2018 were included. The estimation of CSPH by LSN and LSM, and the LSM-spleen-size-to-platelet ratio score (LSPS) were evaluated and compared. Results In total, 140 patients were included (109 men [78%], mean age 63 ± 9 years old), including 39 (28%) with CSPH. LSN measurements were valid in 130 patients (93%) and significantly correlated with HVPG (r = 0.68; p 75% of patients. Such a combination could be useful in centres where the HVPG measurement is unavailable. Lay summary The diagnostic performance and feasibility of liver surface nodularity was similar to that of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) for the detection of clinically significant portal hypertension in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Thus, liver surface nodularity could be an option for the preoperative detection of clinically significant portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Combining liver surface nodularity with LSM-spleen-size-to-platelet ratio score resulted in the accurate detection of clinically significant portal hypertension in >75% of patients, thus limiting the need for HVPG measurements., Graphical abstract, Highlights • Diagnostic performance of LSN is similar to that of LSM for the diagnosis of CSPH in patients with cirrhosis and HCC. • LSN could be useful for the preoperative detection of CSPH in patients with HCC and compensated cirrhosis. • Combination of LSN as a first-line non-invasive test and LSPS accurately detected CSPH in >75% of patients.

The goal of this study was to assess the relationship between liver surface nodularity (LSN), chemotherapy-associated liver injury (CALI), and clinically relevant post-hepatectomy liver failure (CR-PHLF) (i.e., ≥ grade B) in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM).Preoperative CT scans of patients who underwent chemotherapy followed by hepatectomy for CLM between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. LSN was measured using semi-automated CT software CT images in patients who had available preoperative CT scans within 6 weeks before hepatectomy, and was computed based on the means of one to 10 measurements by two abdominal radiologists consensually. The association of LSN, CALI, and CR-PHLF was analyzed.Two hundred fifty-six patients were analyzed (149 men and 107 women; overall median age, 61 [range, 29-88 years]). A total of 26 patients (10.2%) developed CR-PHLF. The optimal LSN cut-off value for detecting CR-PHLF was 2.5, as determined by receiver operative characteristic analysis (p0.001). LSN ≥ 2.5 was associated with prolonged chemotherapy (6 cycles, p = 0.018), but not with CALIs. After propensity score matching, LSN remained significantly associated with CR-PHLF (p = 0.031). Furthermore, multivariate analysis identified LSN ≥ 2.50 and future liver remnant (FLR)30% as significant preoperative predictors of CR-PHLF in 102 patients undergoing major hepatectomy. LSN ≥ 2.50 was more frequent in patients undergoing major hepatectomy despite FLR ≥ 30% (p = 0.008).LSN quantified on CT is an independent surrogate of CR-PHLF in patients who undergo chemotherapy followed by hepatectomy for CLM and may provide a valuable additional tool in the preoperative assessment of these patients.• LSN was not associated with chemotherapy- associated liver injury but high LSN (defined ≥ 2.5) was associated with prolonged chemotherapy (6 cycles). • High LSN was an independent predictor of clinically relevant postoperative liver failure in patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM. • LSN ≥ 2.50 was more frequent in patients with PHLF after major hepatectomy despite a future liver remnant ≥ 30%.

Laparoscopy is nowadays considered as the standard approach for hepatic left lateral sectionectomy (LLS), but its value in the prevention of incisional hernia (IH) has not been demonstrated.Between 2012 and 2017, patients undergoing laparoscopic (LLLS) or open LLS (OLLS) in 8 centers were compared. Patients undergoing a simultaneous major abdominal procedure were excluded. The incidence of IH was assessed clinically and morphologically on computed tomography (CT) using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and multivariable regression analysis.After IPTW, 84 LLLS were compared to 48 OLLS. Compared to OLLS, LLLS patients had reduced blood loss (100 [IQR: 50-200] ml vs. 150 [IQR: 50-415] ml, p = 0.023) and shorter median hospital stay (5 [IQR: 4-7] days vs. 7 [6-9] days, p 0.001), but experienced similar rate of postoperative complications (mean comprehensive complication index: 12 ± 19 after OLLS versus 13 ± 20 after LLLS, p = 0.968). Long-term radiological screening was performed with a median follow-up of 27.4 (12.1-44.9) months. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of clinically relevant IH (10.7% [n = 9] after LLLS, 8.3% [n = 4] after OLLS, p = 0.768). The rate of IH detected on computed tomography was lower after LLLS than after OLLS (11.9% [n = 10] versus 29.2% [n = 14], p = 0.013). On multivariable analysis, the laparoscopic approach was the only independent factor influencing the risk of morphological IH (OR = 0.290 [95% CI: 0.094-0.891], p = 0.031). The 2 preferential sites for specimen extraction after LLLS were Pfannenstiel and midline incisions, with rates of IH across the extraction site of 2.3% [n = 1/44] and 23.8% [n = 5/21], respectively (p = 0.011).The laparoscopic approach for LLS decreases the risk of long-term IH as evidenced on morphological examinations, with limited clinical impact. Pfannenstiel's incision should be preferred to midline incision for specimen extraction after LLLS.

Laparoscopic surgery has become an increasingly popular alternative approach to open surgery, resulting in a paradigm shift in liver surgery. Although laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) was initially indicated for small benign and peripheral tumors, at present more than half of LLRs are performed in malignant tumors. Several studies have reported the feasibility of LLR in malignant disease and suggested various short-term benefits compared to open liver resection, including decreased blood loss and postoperative complications and a shorter hospital stay. Although these benefits are important to surgeons, patients, and providers, the main goal of surgery for malignancies is to achieve a maximum oncologic benefit.The relevance of the laparoscopic approach must be assessed in relation to the possibility of respecting basic oncological rules and the expertise of the center. Easy LLRs can be safely performed by most surgeons with minimum expertise in liver surgery and laparoscopy, and can therefore probably provide an oncological benefit. On the other hand, intermediate or difficult LLRs require technical expertise and an oncological benefit can only be achieved in expert centers. Technical standardization is the only way to obtain an oncological benefit with this type of resection, and many problems must still be solved.

This work's objective was to review the literature on biliary surgery in order to best define the surgical indications and the specifics of their management. A review of the literature from 1995 to August 2015 was conducted in Pubmed and Google Scholar.

Background The relevance of laparoscopic resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains debated. The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic (LLR) and open (OLR) liver resection for ICC, with specific focus on textbook outcome and lymph node dissection (LND). Methods Patients undergoing LLR or OLR for ICC were included from two French, nationwide hepatopancreatobiliary surveys undertaken between 2000 and 2017. Patients with negative margins, and without transfusion, severe complications, prolonged hospital stay, readmission or death were considered to have a textbook outcome. Patients who achieved both a textbook outcome and LND were deemed to have an adjusted textbook outcome. OLR and LLR were compared after propensity score matching. Results In total, 548 patients with ICC (127 LLR, 421 OLR) were included. Textbook-outcome and LND completion rates were 22.1 and 48.2 per cent respectively. LLR was independently associated with a decreased rate of LND (odds ratio 0.37, 95 per cent c.i. 0.20 to 0.69). After matching, 109 patients remained in each group. LLR was associated with a decreased rate of transfusion (7.3 versus 21.1 per cent; P = 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (median 7 versus 14 days; P = 0.001), but lower rate of LND (33.9 versus 73.4 per cent; P = 0.001). Patients who underwent LLR had lower rate of adjusted TO completion than patients who had OLR (6.5 versus 17.4 per cent; P = 0.012). Conclusion The laparoscopic approach did not substantially improve quality of care of patients with resectable ICC.

Background & Aims Herein, we aimed to establish benchmark values – based on a composite indicator of healthcare quality – for the performance of laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLLS) and laparoscopic right hepatectomy (LRH) using data from expert centers. Methods Data from a nationwide multicenter survey including all patients undergoing LLLS and LRH between 2000 and 2017 were analyzed. Textbook outcome (TO) completion was considered in patients fulfilling all 6 of the following characteristics: negative margins, no transfusion, no complication, no prolonged hospital stay, no readmission and no mortality. For each procedure, a cut-off laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) volume by center was associated with TO on multivariable analysis. These cut-offs defined the expert centers. The benchmark values were set at the 75th percentile of median outcomes among these expert centers. Results Among 4,400 LLRs performed in 29 centers, 855 patients who underwent LLLS and 488 who underwent LRH were identified. The overall incidences of TO after LLLS and LRH were 43.7% and 23.8%, respectively. LLR volume cut-offs of 25 LLR/year (odds ratio [OR] 2.45; bootstrap 95% CI 1.65–3.69; p = 0.001) and 35 LLR/year (OR 2.55; bootstrap 95% CI 1.34–5.63; p = 0.003) were independently associated with completion of TO after LLLS and LRH, respectively. Eight centers for LLLS and 6 centers for LRH, including 516 and 346 patients undergoing LLLS/LRH respectively, reached these cut-offs and were identified as expert centers. After LLLS, benchmark values of severe complication, mortality and TO completion were defined as ≤5.3%, ≤1.2% and ≥46.6%, respectively. After LRH, benchmark values of severe complication, mortality and TO completion were ≤20.4%, ≤2.8% and ≥24.2%, respectively. Conclusions This study provides an up-to-date reference on the benchmark performance of LLLS and LRH in expert centers. Lay summary In a nationwide French survey of laparoscopic liver resection, expert centers were defined according to the completion of a textbook outcome, which is a composite indicator of healthcare quality. Benchmark values regarding intra-operative details and outcomes were established using data from 516 patients with laparoscopic left lateral sectionectiomy and 346 patients with laparoscopic right hepatectomy from expert centers. These values should be used as a reference point to improve the quality of laparoscopic resections.

The aim was to analyse the impact of cirrhosis on short-term outcomes after laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in a multicentre national cohort study.This retrospective study included all patients undergoing LLR in 27 centres between 2000 and 2017. Cirrhosis was defined as F4 fibrosis on pathological examination. Short-term outcomes of patients with and without liver cirrhosis were compared after propensity score matching by centre volume, demographic and tumour characteristics, and extent of resection.Among 3150 patients included, LLR was performed in 774 patients with (24·6 per cent) and 2376 (75·4 per cent) without cirrhosis. Severe complication and mortality rates in patients with cirrhosis were 10·6 and 2·6 per cent respectively. Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) developed in 3·6 per cent of patients with cirrhosis and was the major cause of death (11 of 20 patients). After matching, patients with cirrhosis tended to have higher rates of severe complications (odds ratio (OR) 1·74, 95 per cent c.i. 0·92 to 3·41; P = 0·096) and PHLF (OR 7·13, 0·91 to 323·10; P = 0·068) than those without cirrhosis. They also had a higher risk of death (OR 5·13, 1·08 to 48·61; P = 0·039). Rates of cardiorespiratory complications (P = 0·338), bile leakage (P = 0·286) and reoperation (P = 0·352) were similar in the two groups. Patients with cirrhosis had a longer hospital stay than those without (11 versus 8 days; P = 0·018). Centre expertise was an independent protective factor against PHLF in patients with cirrhosis (OR 0·33, 0·14 to 0·76; P = 0·010).Underlying cirrhosis remains an independent risk factor for impaired outcomes in patients undergoing LLR, even in expert centres.El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar el impacto de la cirrosis en los resultados a corto plazo después de la resección hepática laparoscópica (laparoscopic liver resection, LLR) en un estudio de cohortes multicéntrico nacional. MÉTODOS: Este estudio retrospectivo incluyó todos los pacientes sometidos a LLR en 27 centros entre 2000 y 2017. La cirrosis se definió como fibrosis F4 en el examen histopatológico. Los resultados a corto plazo de los pacientes con hígado cirrótico (cirrhotic liver CL) (pacientes CL) y los pacientes con hígado no cirrótico (non-cirrhotic liver, NCL) (pacientes NCL) se compararon después de realizar un emparejamiento por puntaje de propension del volumen del centro, las características demográficas y del tumor, y la extensión de la resección.Del total de 3.150 pacientes incluidos, se realizó LLR en 774 (24,6%) pacientes CL y en 2.376 (75,4%) pacientes NCL. Las tasas de complicaciones graves y mortalidad en el grupo de pacientes CL fueron del 10,6% y 2,6%, respectivamente. La insuficiencia hepática posterior a la hepatectomía (post-hepatectomy liver failure, PHLF) fue la principal causa de mortalidad (55% de los casos) y se produjo en el 3,6% de los casos en pacientes CL. Después del emparejamiento, los pacientes CL tendieron a tener tasas más altas de complicaciones graves (razón de oportunidades, odds ratio, OR 1,74; i.c. del 95% 0,92-0,41; P = 0,096) y de PHLF (OR 7,13; i.c. del 95% 0,91-323,10; P = 0,068) en comparación con los pacientes NCL. Los pacientes CL estuvieron expuestos a un mayor riesgo de mortalidad (OR 5,13; i.c. del 95% 1,08-48,6; P = 0,039) en comparación con los pacientes NCL. Los pacientes CL presentaron tasas similares de complicaciones cardiorrespiratorias graves (P = 0,338), de fuga biliar (P = 0,286) y de reintervenciones (P = 0,352) que los pacientes NCL. Los pacientes CL tuvieron una estancia hospitalaria más larga (11 versus 8 días; P = 0,018) que los pacientes NCL. La experiencia del centro fue un factor protector independiente de PHLF (OR 0,33; i.c. del 95% 0,14-0,76; P = 0,010) pacientes CL. CONCLUSIÓN: La presencia de cirrosis subyacente sigue siendo un factor de riesgo independiente de peores resultados en pacientes sometidos a resección hepática laparoscópica, incluso en centros con experiencia.

Background Combined preoperative portal and hepatic vein embolization (biembolization, BE) has been recently described and may further enhance preoperative FLR growth. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of combined preoperative biembolization and portal vein embolization (PVE). Methods This study was performed between 2010 and 2017. From 2010 to 2014, patients only underwent preoperative PVE. After 2014, BE was proposed as an alternative to PVE. Liver volumetry was assessed by a CT-scan before BE or PVE and then three weeks later. Results During the study period, 72 patients underwent radiological procedures that included 41 PVE (PVE group) and 31 BE (BE group). The time elapsing between the procedure and surgery was similar (p = 0.760). The mean percentage of FLR ratio hypertrophy in the PVE group was 31.9% (±34), but reached 51.2% (±42) in the BE group (p = 0.018) and this difference remained significant under multivariate analysis that included age, gender, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, cirrhosis and NASH. The kinetic growth rates were 19% (±17%) and 8% (±13%) in the BE and PVE groups, respectively (p = 0.026). Conclusion This study shows that BE induces higher hypertrophy than portal vein embolization before major liver resection with no more morbidity.

Objective To introduce the laparoscopic approach in liver transplant recipients. Summary of background data Despite the increasingly frequent use of laparoscopy in living donor hepatectomy, the laparoscopic approach has never been reported in liver transplant recipients. Methods A 52-year-old woman (body mass index: 18.5 kg/m) with neuroendocrine liver metastases of a digestive origin underwent hybrid liver transplantation by pure laparoscopic total hepatectomy and liver graft implantation using a preexisting midline incision. The hepatic pedicle vessels were dissected after division of the bile duct without a porto-caval shunt. Left lateral sectionectomy and early division of the common trunk allowed near completion of caval dissection with no prolonged inflow occlusion. The liver graft was reduced and latero-lateral caval anastomosis was performed. Results Surgery lasted 400 minutes with 400 mL of blood loss. The anhepatic phase lasted 43 minutes. Warm ischemia time and cold ischemia times were 38 and 466 minutes, respectively. The postoperative course was uneventful. Conclusions This case study suggests that the hybrid approach may be feasible and safe in selected recipients. The decision to use this surgical approach should be made in transplant centers with significant expertise in both laparoscopic liver and pancreatic surgery. Further reducing the size of the abdominal incision is the next step, which may be achieved with the development of vascular anastomoses devices.

Laparoscopic liver surgery has gained wide acceptance resulting in a paradigm shift of liver surgery. Technical innovations and accumulation of surgeon's experience have allowed laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) to become an effective procedure with favorable peri- and post-operative outcomes. Through the overall process of LLR, liver parenchymal transection remains the most critical step with the aim of minimizing blood loss and secures the appropriate cutting line, i.e., securing major vessels and obtaining adequate surgical margin clearance for malignancies. Multiple preoperative imaging modalities and intraoperative ultrasonography findings may contribute to the best determination of the appropriate cutting line during the LLR; however, technical expertise in minimizing and controlling bleeding during liver parenchymal transection is still a challenge for safe LLR, and therefore represents a major concern for hepatobiliary surgeons. Along with the historical fact that the technique of liver parenchymal transection itself is chosen according to surgeon's preference and "savoir-faire", the best technical modality in laparoscopic liver parenchymal transection remains to be determined. However, better understanding the technical issue may serve a contribution to the standardization of LLR. This review article therefore focuses on the technical aspects of the laparoscopic liver parenchymal transection.

The worldwide implementation of a liver graft pool using marginal livers (ie, grafts with a high risk of technical complications and impaired function or with a risk of transmitting infection or malignancy to the recipient) has led to a growing interest in developing methods for accurate evaluation of graft quality. Liver steatosis is associated with a higher risk of primary nonfunction, early graft dysfunction, and poor graft survival rate. The present study aimed to analyze the value of artificial intelligence (AI) in the assessment of liver steatosis during procurement compared with liver biopsy evaluation. A total of 117 consecutive liver grafts from brain-dead donors were included and classified into 2 cohorts: ≥30 versus

To assess and compare the performance of liver surface nodularity (LSN) quantification using Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MRI and contrast-enhanced CT for the diagnosis of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in patients with cirrhosis. This retrospective study included 30 patients with compensated histologically proven cirrhosis who underwent hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), abdominal CT and Gd-BOPTA-MRI within a 60-day interval during pre-surgery workup for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between January 2016 and August 2018. LSN score was derived from CT portal venous phase (PVP), axial T2- and T1-weighted PVP and hepatobiliary phase (HBP). Accuracy for the detection of CSPH was evaluated for each set of images by ROC curve analysis. Intra-observer, inter-observer and inter-method reproducibilities were assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV). Thirty patients were analysed (23 men [77%], mean age 60 ± 11 years old), including 15 (50%) with CSPH. All CT- and MRI-derived LSN quantifications were correlated to HVPG (CT-PVP: r = 0.63, p = 0.001, AUROC = 0.908 ± 0.06; T1-w-PVP: r = 0.43, p = 0.028, AUROC = 0.876 ± 0.07; T1-w-HBP: r = 0.50, p = 0.012, AUROC = 0.823 ± 0.08; T2-w: r = 0.51, p = 0.007, AUROC = 0.801 ± 0.09). There was no significant difference in AUROC pairwise comparisons (p = 0.12–0.88). Patients with CSPH had higher LSN than those without (CT-PVP: 3.2 ± 0.6 vs 2.4 ± 0.5, p

The predictive risk factors of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CR-PF) following distal pancreatectomy (DP) remain to be identified. This is a retrospective cohort analysis of a single-institution database of patients undergoing DP, taking into account usual demographic, operative, and pathologic variables and visceral fat area (VFA), total muscle area (TMA), and surface muscle index (SMI) measured on preoperative CT scan. The primary end point was CR-PF. All variables associated with a p value

Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) currently represents the gold standard after resection of the biliary confluence. This non-physiological reconstruction poses several problems such as repeated cholangitis or stricture without conventional endoscopic access. Our aim was to describe and to report both feasibility and results of duct-to-duct anastomosis with removable internal biliary drain (RIBS) as an alternative technique to the HJ after resection of the biliary confluence in patients undergoing major liver resection. Between January 2014 and January 2018, all patients who underwent a major hepatectomy associated with resection of the biliary confluence and reconstruction by duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis with RIBS were retrospectively included. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, pre- and postoperative outcomes, early and late biliary complications, endoscopic complications, and clinical follow-up were collected. Twelve patients were included. The operative time was 326 ± 45 min (range 240–380 min). There was no postoperative mortality. Only one patient experienced biliary anastomotic leakage treated exclusively by radiological and endoscopic drainage. Four patients had an asymptomatic stricture of the biliary anastomosis detected by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during the extraction of the RIBS requiring iterative dilatation and replacement of the RIBS. Among 21 performed ERCP, no complications such as failure of RIBS extraction, duodenal perforation, bleeding after sphincterotomy, cholangitis, or pancreatitis were observed. After a mean and a median follow-up of respectively 15.0 ± 14.9 and 8.7 months (range 2.0–46.1 months), no cholangitis occurred. Duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis with RIBS insertion after resection of the biliary confluence represents a feasible and safe alternative to the HJ.