Search

The DNase I binding loop (residues 38-52), the hydrophobic plug (residues 262-274), and the C terminus region are among the structural elements of monomeric (G-) actin proposed to form the intermonomer interface in F-actin. To test the proximity and interactions of these elements and to provide constraints on models of F-actin structure, cysteine residues were introduced into yeast actin either at residue 41 or 265. These mutations allowed for specific cross-linking of F-actin between C41 and C265, C265 and C374, and C41 and C265 using dibromobimane and disulfide bond formation. The cross-linked products were visualized on SDS-PAGE and by electron microscopy. Model calculations carried out for the cross-linked F-actins revealed that considerable flexibility or displacement of actin residues is required in the disulfide cross-linked segments to fit these filaments into model F-actin structures. The calculated, cross-linked structures showed a better fit to the Holmes rather than the refined Lorenz model of F-actin. It is predicted on the basis of such calculations that image reconstruction of electron micrographs of disulfide cross-linked C41-C374 F-actin should provide a conclusive test of these two similar models of F-actin structure.

Cys 10 is located in subdomain 1 of actin, which has an important role in the interaction of actin with myosin- and actin-binding proteins. Cys 10 was modified with fluorescence probes N -(iodoacetyl) N′ -(5-sulfo-1-naphthyl)ethylene diamine (IAEDANS), 7-diethylamino-3-(4′-maleimidylphenyl)-4-methylcoumarin (CPM), or monobromo bimane (MBB) by the method of Drewes and Faulstich (1991, J. Biol. Chem. 266:5508–5513). The specificity of Cys 10 modification was verified by showing that the 33-kDa subtilisin fragment of actin (residues 48–375), which contains all of the actin thiols but Cys 10 , is not fluorescent. Cys 10 modification exposed a new site on actin to subtilisin cleavage. Edman degradation revealed this site to be between Ala 19 and Gly 20 . The modification slightly increased the rate of ϵATP-ATP exchange and decreased the rates of G-actin ATPase and polymerization. The activation of S1 ATPase by Cys 10 -modified F-actin showed small probe-dependent changes in the values of V max and K M . The sliding speed of actin filaments in the in vitro motility assay remained unchanged upon modification of Cys 10 . These results indicate that although the labeling of Cys 10 perturbs the structure of subdomain 1, the modified actin remains fully functional. The binding of S1 to actin filaments decreases the accessibility of Cys 10 probes to acrylamide and nitromethane quenchers. Because Cys 10 does not participate directly in either actin polymerization or S1 binding, our results indicate that actin-actin and actin-myosin interactions induce dynamic, allosteric changes in actin structure.

Subdomain 2 of actin is a dynamic segment of the molecule. The cross-linking of Gln-41 on subdomain 2 to Cys-374 on an adjacent monomer in F-actin inhibits actomyosin motility and force generation (Kim et al., 1998; Biochemistry 37, 17,801–17,809). To shed light on this effect, additional modifications of the Gln-41 site on actin were carried out. Both intact G-actin and G-actin cleaved by subtilisin between Met-47 and Gly-48 in the DNase 1 binding loop of subdomain 2 were treated with bacterial transglutaminase. According to the results of Edman degradation, transglutaminase introduced an intramolecular zero-length cross-linking between Gln-41 and Lys-50 in both intact and subtilisin cleaved actins. This cross-linking perturbs G-actin structure as shown by the inhibition of subtilisin and tryptic cleavage in subdomain 2, an allosteric inhibition of tryptic cleavage at the C-terminus and decrease of modification rate of Cys-374. The cross-linking increases while the subtilisin cleavage dramatically decreases the thermostability of F-actin. The Mg- and S1-induced polymerizations of both intact and subtilisin cleaved actins were only slightly influenced by the cross-linking. The activation of S1 ATPase by actin and the sliding speeds of actin filaments in the in vitro motility assays were essentially unchanged by the cross-linking. Thus, although intramolecular cross-linking between Gln-41 and Lys-50 perturbs the structure of the actin monomer, it has only a small effect on actin polymerization and its interaction with myosin. These results suggest that the new cross-linking does not alter the intermonomer interface in F-actin and that changes in actomyosin motility reported for the Gln-41–Cys-374 intrastrand cross-linked actin are not due to decreased flexibility of loop 38–52 but to constrains introduced into the F-actin structure and/or to perturbations at the actin's C-terminus.

According to the Lorenz et al. (Lorenz, M., Poole, K. J., Popp, D., Rosenbaum, G., and Holmes, K. C. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 246, 108–119) atomic model of the actin-tropomyosin complex, actin residue Asp-311 (Glu-311 in yeast) is predicted to have a high binding energy contribution to actin-tropomyosin binding. Using the yeast actin mutant E311A/R312A in the in vitro motility assays, we have investigated the role of these residues in such interactions. Wild type (wt) yeast actin, like skeletal α-actin, is fully regulated when complexed with tropomyosin (Tm) and troponin (Tn). Structure-function comparisons of the wt and E311A/R312A actins show no significant differences between them, and the unregulated F-actins slide at similar speeds in thein vitro motility assay. However, in the presence of Tm and Tn, the mutation increases both the sliding speed and the number of moving filaments at high pCa values, shifting the speed-pCa curve nearly 0.5 pCa units to the left. Tm alone (no Tn) inhibits the motilities of both actins at low heavy meromyosin densities but potentiates only the motility of the mutant actin at high heavy meromyosin densities. Actin-Tm binding measurements indicate no significant difference between wt and E311A/R312A actin in Tm binding. These results implicate allosteric effects in the regulation of actomyosin function by tropomyosin.

The properties of myosin modified at the SH2 group (Cys-697) were studied and compared with the previously reported properties of myosin modified at the SH1 group (Cys-707). 4-[N-[(iodoacetoxy)ethyl]-N methylamino]-7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazole (IANBD) was used for selective modification of the SH2 group on myosin. SH2-labeled heavy meromyosin (SH2-HMM), similar to SH1-labeled HMM (SH1-HMM), did not propel actin filaments in the in vitro motility assays. SH1- and SH2-HMM produced similar amounts of load in the mixtures with unmodified HMM; the sliding speed of actin filaments gradually decreased with an increase in the fraction of either one of the modified HMMs in the mixture. In analogy to SH1-labeled myosin subfragment 1 (SH1-S1), SH2-labeled S1 (SH2-S1) activated regulated actin in the in vitro motility assays. SH2 modification inhibited Mg-ATPase of S1 and its activation by actin. The weak binding of S1 to actin was unaffected whereas the strong binding was weakened by SH2 modification. Overall, our results demonstrate similar behavior of SH1- and SH2-modified myosin heads in the in vitro motility assays despite some differences in their enzymatic properties. The effects of these modifications are ascribed to the location of the SH1-SH2 helix relative to other functional centers of S1.

Glutamate dehydrogenase is encapsulated in a transparent porous silicate matrix by using sol-gel techniques. The inorganic polymer is formed around the enzyme (MW > 300,000 D). The enzyme is active in the material, catalyzes the reaction of L-glutamate to 2-oxoglutarate and follows Michaelis-Menten kinetics. The allosteric regulators ADP and GTP inhibit or activate the reaction; at pH 6, GTP acts as a strong activator and ADP acts as an inhibitor. This system involves a complex series of interactions; the co-enzyme NAD+ is required for catalysis, large-scale conformational changes accompany the binding of the substrate and coenzyme to the enzyme, the activators/inhibitors must bind to the enzyme to regulate the reactions, and the substrates and products must diffuse through the matrix to and from the binding site. The influence of the unique matrix on the complex enzymatic system is discussed.

Actin filaments partially cross-linked with ANP (N-(4-azido-2-nitrophenyl)-putrescine between Gln-41 and Cys-374 on adjacent monomers in the long-pitch helix were depolymerized and fractionated into pools of longitudinal cross-linked dimers (s(o)20,w = 5.55 +/- 0.22 S), trimers (s(o)20,w = 6.93 +/- 0.12 S), and higher-order oligomers. Competition binding experiments of myosin subfragment (S1) to cross-linked dimers in the presence of pyrenyl G-actin revealed about 2 orders of magnitude stronger binding of the first than that of the second S1 molecule to actin dimer. Under similar conditions the unpolymerized cross-linked actin species activated the MgATPase of S1 only severalfold compared to 70-fold activation by F-actin. The cross-linked dimers, trimers, and oligomers were polymerized into filaments by MgCl2 faster than un-cross-linked actin. In electron micrographs these filaments appeared sometimes shorter and had greater tendency to bend than un-cross-linked actin filaments. Small amounts of cross-linked actin dimers nucleated S1-induced polymerization of actin, but the polymerization by S1 was inhibited for pure populations of cross-linked dimers, trimers, and oligomers. The cross-linked dimers did not decrease the kinetic difference between the polymerization of actin by S1 isozymes S1(A1) and S1(A2). According to electron microscopy evidence, cross-linked actin oligomers polymerized by S1 yielded much shorter arrowhead structures than the un-cross-linked actin. These results indicate the importance of lateral actin-actin interaction for the activation of myosin ATPase and the polymerization of actin by S1.

A new heterobifunctional photo-cross-linking reagent, N-(4-azido-2-nitrophenyl)-putrescine (ANP), was synthesized and covalently bound to Gln-41 of rabbit skeletal muscle actin by a bacterial transglutaminase-mediated reaction. Up to 1.0 mol of the reagent was incorporated per mole of G-actin; at least 90% of it was bound to Gln-41 while a minor fraction (about 8%) was attached to Gln-59. The labeled G-actin was polymerized, and the resulting F-actin was intermolecularly cross-linked by irradiation with UV light. The labeled and cross-linked peptides were isolated from either a complete or limited tryptic digest of cross-linked actin. In the limited digest the tryptic cleavage was restricted to arginine by succinylation of the lysyl residues. N-terminal sequencing and mass spectrometry indicated that the cross-linked peptides contained residues 40-50 (or 40-62 in the arginine limited digest) and residues 373-375, and that the actual cross-linking took place between Gln-41 and Cys-374. This latter finding was also supported by the inhibition of Cys-374 labeling with a fluorescent probe in the cross-linked actin. The dynamic length of ANP, between 11.1 and 12.5 A, constrains to that range the distance between the gamma-carboxyl group of Gln-41 in one monomer and the sulfur atom of Cys-374 in an adjacent monomer. This is consistent with the distances between these two residues on adjacent monomers of the same strand in the long-pitch helix in the structural models of F-actin [Holmes, K. C., Popp, D., Gebhard, W., and Kabsch, W. (1990) Nature 347, 44-49 and Lorenz, M., Popp, D., and Holmes, K. C. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 234, 826-836]. The effect of cross-linking on the function of actin is described in the companion papers.

Previous biochemical studies have shown that the SH1 (Cys707) and SH2 (Cys697) groups on rabbit skeletal myosin subfragment 1 (S1) can be cross-linked by using reagents of different cross-linking lengths. In the presence of nucleotide, this cross-linking is accelerated. In the crystal structure of S1, the SH1 and SH2 residues are located on an alpha-helix, 19 A apart. Thus, the cross-linking results could be indicative of helix melting or increased flexibility in the presence of nucleotides. Nucleotide-induced changes in this region were examined in this study by monitoring the cross-linking of SH1 and SH2 on S1 with dimaleimide reagents of spans ranging from 5 to 15 A. A method was devised to directly measure the kinetic effects of nucleotides on the rates of cross-linking reactions. The slow and reagent-insensitive rates of the SH1-SH2 cross-linking in the absence of nucleotides reveal that the equipartitioning of the SH1-SH2 helix among states with different SH1-SH2 separations occurs infrequently. In the presence of MgADP, MgATP, and MgATPgammaS, the rates of SH1 and SH2 cross-linking were increased approximately 2-7-fold for the shortest reagent (5-8 A). Rate accelerations were much greater for the longer reagents (9-15 A): 40-50-fold for MgADP, 25-40-fold for MgATP, and 80-270-fold for MgATPgammaS. To account for any nucleotide-dependent differences in the reactivities of the reagents toward SH2, the rates of monofunctional SH2 modification on SH1-labeled S1 were also measured for each reagent. These experiments showed that the nucleotide-induced increases in the rates of SH2 modification were similar for all of the reagents. Thus, the changes observed in the cross-linking rates are due not only to the type of nucleotide bound in the active site but also to the span of the cross-linking reagent. These findings are interpreted in terms of nucleotide-induced shifts in the equilibria among conformational states of the SH1-SH2 helix.

Residues 262–274 form a loop between subdomains 3 and 4 of actin. This loop may play an important role in actin filament formation and stabilization. To assess directly the behavior of this loop, we mutated Ser265 of yeast actin to cysteine (S265C) and created another mutant (S265C/C374A) by changing Cys374 of S265C actin to alanine. These changes allowed us to attach a pyrene maleimide stoichiometrically to either Cys374 or Cys265. These mutations had no detectable effects on the protease susceptibility, intrinsic ATPase activity, and thermal stability of labeled or unlabeled G-actin. The presence of the loop cysteine, either labeled or unlabeled, did not affect the actin-activated S1 ATPase activity or the in vitro motility of the actin. Both mutant actins, either labeled or unlabeled, nucleated filament formation considerably faster than wild-type (WT) actin, although the critical concentration was not affected. Whereas the fluorescence of the C-terminal (WT) probe increased during polymerization, that of the loop (S265C/C374A) probe decreased, and the fluorescence of the doubly labeled actin (S265C) was ∼50% less than the sum of the fluorescence of the individual fluorophores. Quenching was also observed in copolymers of labeled WT and S265C/C374A actins. An excimer peak was present in the emission spectrum of labeled S265C F-actin and in the labeled S265C/C374A-WT actin copolymers. These results show that in the filaments, the C-terminal pyrene of a substantial fraction of monomers directly interacts with the loop pyrene of neighboring monomers, bringing the two cysteine sulfurs to within 18 A of one another. Finally, when bound to labeled S265C/C374A F-actin, myosin S1, but not tropomyosin, caused an increase in fluorescence of the loop probe. Both proteins had no effect on excimer fluorescence. These results help establish the orientation of monomers in F-actin and show that the binding of S1 to actin subdomains 1 and 2 affects the environment of the loop between subdomains 3 and 4.

The reactive SH1 (Cys-707) group of the myosin subfragment 1 (S1) has been used frequently as an attachment site for fluorescent and spin probes in solution and muscle fiber experiments. In this study we examined (i) the motor function of SH1 spin-labeled heavy meromyosin (HMM) in the in vitro motility assays and (ii) the effect of SH1-modified S1 on the motility of regulated actin, i.e., actin complexed with tropomyosin and troponin. N-ethylmaleimide (NEM), N-(1-oxyl-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)-iodacetamide (IASL), N-[[(iodoacetyl)amino]ethyl]1-sulfo-5-naphthylamine (IAEDANS), and iodoacetamide (IAA) were used to selectively modify the SH1 group on S1; the SH1 group on HMM was labeled with IASL. In the in vitro motility assays, 10-20% of unregulated actin filaments moved at a speed of approximately 1 microm/s over a surface coated with 90-95% modified IASL-HMM. Actin sliding was not observed with 95-98% modified IASL-HMM. The sliding of regulated actin over unmodified HMM was activated by the addition of S1 modified with any of the SH1 reagents to the in vitro motility assay solutions; both the speeds and the percentage of the moving filaments increased at pCa 5, 7, and 8. To shed light on the activation of regulated actin sliding by SH1-modifed S1, acto-S1 ATPase and the binding to actin were determined for IASL-S1. While the binding affinities to actin were similar for IASL-S1 and unmodified S1 in the presence and absence of ADP and ATP, the Km and Vmax values were approximately 10-fold lower for the modified protein. It is concluded that the activation of regulated actin by SH1-modifed S1 facilitates the interaction of unmodified HMM heads with actin and thus can increase the sliding speeds and the percentage of regulated actin filaments that move in the in vitro motility assays.

Nucleotide and actin binding properties of the truncated myosin head (S1dC) from Dictyostelium myosin II were studied in solution using rabbit skeletal myosin subfragment 1 as a reference material. S1dC and subfragment 1 had similar affinities for ADP analogues, ɛADP and TNP-ADP. The complexes of ɛADP and BeFx or AlF4 - were less stable with S1dC than with subfragment 1. Stern-Volmer constants for acrylamide quenching of S1dC complexes with ɛADP, ɛADP·AlF 4 - and ɛADP.BeFx were 2.6, 2.9 and 2.2 M-1, respectively. The corresponding values for subfragment 1 were 2.6, 1.5 and 1.1 M-1. The environment of the nucleotide binding site was probed by using a hydrophobic fluorescent probe, PPBA. PPBA was a competitive inhibitor of S1dC Ca2+-ATPase (Ki = 1.6 μm). The binding of nucleotides to subfragment 1 enhanced PPBA fluorescence and caused blue shifts in the wavelength of its maximum emission in the order: ATP ≈ ADP·AlF4- ≈ ADP·BeFx > ATPSγS > ADP > PPi. In the case of S1dC, the effects of different nucleotides were smaller and indistinguishable from each other. S1dC bound actin tighter than S1 (Kd = 7 nm and 60 nm, respectively). The actin activated MgATPase activity of S1dC varied between preparations, and the Vmax and Km values ranged between 3 and 7 s-1 and 60 and 190 μm, respectively. S1dC showed lower structural stability than S1 as revealed by their thermal inactivations at 35° C. These results show that the nucleotide and actin binding of S1dC and subfragment 1 are similar but there are some differences in nucleotide and phosphate analogue-induced changes and the communication between the nucleotide and actin binding sites in these proteins

Cofilin is a member of the actin depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin family of proteins. It plays a key role in actin dynamics by promoting disassembly and assembly of actin filaments. Upon its binding, cofilin has been shown to bridge two adjacent protomers in filamentous actin (F-actin) and promote the displacement and disordering of subdomain 2 of actin. Here, we present evidence for cofilin promoting a new structural change in the actin filament, as detected via a switch in cross-linking sites. Benzophenone-4-maleimide, which normally forms intramolecular cross-linking in F-actin, cross-links F-actin intermolecularly upon cofilin binding. We mapped the cross-linking sites and found that in the absence of cofilin intramolecular cross-linking occurred between residues Cys374 and Asp11. In contrast, cofilin shifts the cross-linking by this reagent to intermolecular, between residue Cys374, located within subdomain 1 of the upper protomer, and Met44, located in subdomain 2 of the lower protomer. The intermolecular cross-linking of F-actin slows the rate of cofilin dissociation from the filaments and decreases the effect of ionic strength on cofilin-actin binding. These results are consistent with a significant role of filament flexibility in cofilin-actin interactions. © 2013 American Chemical Society.

Actin labeled at Gln-41 with dansyl ethylenediamine (DED) via transglutaminase reaction was used for monitoring the interaction of myosin subfragment 1 (S1) with the His-40-Gly-42 site in the 38-52 loop on F-actin. Proteolytic digestions of F-actin with subtilisin and trypsin, and acto-S1 ATPase measurements on heat-treated F-actin revealed that the labeling of Gln-41 had a stabilizing effect on subdomain 2 and the actin filaments. DED on Gln-41 had no effect on the values of K(m) and Vmax of the acto-S1 ATPase and the sliding velocities of actin filaments in the in vitro motility assays. This suggests either that S1 does not bind to the 40-42 site on actin or that such binding is not functionally important. The binding of monoclonal antidansyl IgG to DED-F-actin did not affect acto-S1 binding in the absence of nucleotides, indicating that the 40-42 site does not contribute much to rigor acto-S1 binding. Myosin-induced changes in subdomain 2 on actin were manifested through an increase in the fluorescence of DED-F-actin, a decrease in the accessibility of the probe to collisional quenchers, and a partial displacement of antidansyl IgG from actin by S1. It is proposed that these changes in the 38-52 loop on actin originate from S1 binding to other myosin recognition sites on actin.

Actin purified from the yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisae) was polymerized faster than rabbit skeletal alpha-actin by MgCl2. The two actins polymerized at similar rates in the presence of CaCl2. Yeast actin, up to 25 microM, was not polymerized by KCl (100-300 mM); the monovalent salt also inhibited the MgCl2-induced polymerization of actin. The local structure of the subdomain-2 region in yeast actin filaments was probed by subtilisin and trypsin digestions. Loop 38-52 appeared more flexible and accessible to subtilisin in yeast than in rabbit actin. In contrast, tryptic digestions at Lys-61 and -68 occurred at the same rate for yeast and alpha-actin filaments. Modification of yeast actin by a sulfhydryl reagent CPM [7-(diethylamino)-3-(4'-maleimidophenyl)-4-methylcoumain] was specific to the Cys-374 residue; no labeling of a yeast actin mutant containing an alanine substitution for cysteine 374 was observed. The rates of Cys-374 labeling by CPM were similar for yeast and muscle actin, suggesting a similar environment for the C terminus in both polymers. In the in vitro motility assays, yeast actin required higher concentrations of heavy meromyosin (HMM) for its sliding than did the rabbit actin. At saturating concentrations of HMM, the sliding velocities of both actins were the same (3.0 microns/s). Relative forces generated by HMM with yeast and muscle actin were assessed by monitoring their in vitro motility in the presence of NEM-HMM load. The sliding of yeast actin was stopped at a level of external load (molar ratio NEM-HMM/HMM = 0.25) lower than that of muscle actin (NEM-HMM/HMM = 0.43), suggesting lower force production with yeast actin. These results are discussed in terms of the myosin cross-bridge cycle and actomyosin interactions.

Gln-41 on G-actin was specifically labeled with a fluorescent probe, dansyl ethylenediamine (DED), via transglutaminase reaction to explore the conformational changes in subdomain 2 of actin. Replacement of Ca2+ with Mg2+ and ATP with ADP on G-actin produced large changes in the emission properties of DED. These substitutions resulted in blue shifts in the wavelength of maximum emission and increases in DED fluorescence. Excitation of labeled actin at 295 nm revealed energy transfer from tryptophans to DED. Structure considerations and Cu2+ quenching experiments suggested that Trp-79 and/or Trp-86 serves as energy donors to DED. Energy transfer from these residues to DED on Gln-41 increased with the replacement of Ca2+ with Mg2+ and ATP with ADP. Polymerization of Mg-G-actin with MgCl2 resulted in much smaller changes in DED fluorescence than divalent cation substitution. This suggests that the conformation of loop 38–52 on actin is primed for the polymerization reaction by the substitution of Ca2+ with Mg2+ on G-actin.

Assembly and remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton is critical for the vitality of eukaryotic cells. F-actin assembly is favored under cellular conditions and its mechanisms are understood better than those of actin disassembly. Therefore, it is critical to clarify how targeted F-actin disassembly occurs in different cell types. Recently, members of the MICAL family of oxidation-reduction (Redox) enzymes have emerged as a new class of actin disassembly factors that attenuate cytoskeleton dynamics via direct oxidation of F-actin in response to different growth factors, adhesion molecules, and repulsive guidance cues. By employing TIRF microscopy, protein biochemistry and Drosophila genetics we found that actin filaments are efficiently dismantled in vitro and in vivo through a Redox-dependent post-translationally-mediated synergism between cofilin and Mical. Mical oxidation of actin improves cofilin binding to filaments, where their combined effect accelerates F-actin severing and disassembly by over an order of magnitude over that of each one alone. Biochemical characterization of Mical-oxidized actin that is generated in this system shows that it has impaired polymerization properties, further amplifying filament disassembly. This previously unknown synergism is also necessary and sufficient for F-actin disassembly in vivo, dramatically amplifying both Mical and cofilin's effects. Given overlapping expression patterns of cofilin and Mical in multiple tissues this newly discovered synergism has important physiological and pathological implications.

The assembly of actin monomers into filaments and networks plays vital roles throughout eukaryotic biology, including intracellular transport, cell motility, cell division, determining cellular shape, and providing cells with mechanical strength. The regulation of actin assembly and modulation of filament mechanical properties are critical for proper actin function. It is well established that physiological salt concentrations promote actin assembly and alter the overall bending mechanics of assembled filaments and networks. However, the molecular origins of these salt-dependent effects, particularly if they involve nonspecific ionic strength effects or specific ion-binding interactions, are unknown. Here, we demonstrate that specific cation binding at two discrete sites situated between adjacent subunits along the long-pitch helix drive actin polymerization and determine the filament bending rigidity. We classify the two sites as “polymerization” and “stiffness” sites based on the effects that mutations at the sites have on salt-dependent filament assembly and bending mechanics, respectively. These results establish the existence and location of the cation-binding sites that confer salt dependence to the assembly and mechanics of actin filaments.

Conformational changes induced by ATP hydrolysis on actin are involved in the regulation of complex actin networks. Previous structural and biochemical data implicate the DNase I binding loop (D-loop) of actin in such nucleotide-dependent changes. Here, we investigated the structural and conformational states of the D-loop (in solution) using cysteine scanning mutagenesis and site-directed labeling. The reactivity of D-loop cysteine mutants toward acrylodan and the mobility of spin labels on these mutants do not show patterns of an α-helical structure in monomeric and filamentous actin, irrespective of the bound nucleotide. Upon transition from monomeric to filamentous actin, acrylodan emission spectra and electron paramagnetic resonance line shapes of labeled mutants are blue-shifted and more immobilized, respectively, with the central residues (residues 43–47) showing the most drastic changes. Moreover, complex electron paramagnetic resonance line shapes of spin-labeled mutants suggest several conformational states of the D-loop. Together with a new (to our knowledge) actin crystal structure that reveals the D-loop in a unique hairpin conformation, our data suggest that the D-loop equilibrates in F-actin among different conformational states irrespective of the nucleotide state of actin.

Experimental evidence for the involvement of the 18-29 site within actin subdomain-1 in the actomyosin weak binding interface includes the inhibition of actomyosin ATPase activity by specific peptide antibodies [Adams, S., & Reisler, E. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 5051-5056] and by the Dictyostelium actin mutant D24H/D25H [Johara, M., et al. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 2127-2131]. In this work, the effect of the 18-29 peptide antibodies on the polymerization and conformation of actin has been characterized. Binding of antibody to the 18-29 site strongly inhibited the MgCl2-induced polymerization of G-actin, had a much weaker impact on the CaCl2 polymerization of actin, and showed very little effect on the NaCl polymerization of G-actin. These observations were linked to the binding of the 18-29 antibody to the different forms of actin. In sedimentation assays, the (18-29) IgG bound more strongly to Mg-F- and Mg-G-actins than to Ca-F- and Ca-G-actins, respectively. The binding of IgG to F-actin decreased sharply with an increase in ionic strength. Antibody binding to the 18-29 site induced conformational changes within the nucleotide cleft, both slowing the rate of nucleotide exchange and increasing the fluorescence intensity of actin-bound epsilon ATP. The increased fluorescence of a dansyl probe attached to Gln-41 and a pyrene probe attached to Cys-374 demonstrated that antibody binding also caused local perturbations in the DNase I loop of subdomain-2 and at the C-terminus of actin. These results are discussed in terms of actin plasticity and its implications for actomyosin interactions.

In this study, we use fluorescent probes and proteolytic digestions to demonstrate structural coupling between distant regions of actin. We show that modifications of Cys-374 in the C-terminus of actin slow the rate of nucleotide exchange in the nucleotide cleft. Conformational coupling between the C-terminus and the DNasal loop in subdomain II is observed in proteolytic digestion experiments in which a new C-terminal cleavage site is exposed upon DNasel binding. The functional consequences of C-terminal modification are evident from S-1 ATPase activity and the in vitro motility experiments with modified actins. Pyrene actin, labeled at Cys-374, activates S-1 ATPase activity only half as well as control actin. This reduction is attributed to a lower Vmax value because the affinity of pyrene actin to S-1 is not significantly altered. The in vitro sliding velocity of pyrene actin is also decreased. However, IAEDANS labeling of actin (also at Cys-374) enhances the Vmax of acto-S-1 ATPase activity and the in vitro sliding velocity by approximately 25%. These results are discussed in terms of conformational coupling between distant regions in actin and the functional implications of the interactions of actin-binding proteins with the C-terminus of actin.

Actin and myosin are the two main proteins required for cell motility and muscle contraction. The structure of their strongly bound complex-rigor state-is a key for delineating the functional mechanism of actomyosin motor. Current knowledge of that complex is based on models obtained from the docking of known atomic structures of actin and myosin subfragment 1 (S1; the head and neck region of myosin) into low-resolution electron microscopy electron density maps, which precludes atomic- or side-chain-level information. Here, we use radiolytic protein footprinting for global mapping of sites across the actin molecules that are impacted directly or allosterically by myosin binding to actin filaments. Fluorescence and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopies and cysteine actin mutants are used for independent, residue-specific probing of S1 effects on two structural elements of actin. We identify actin residue candidates involved in S1 binding and provide experimental evidence to discriminate between the regions of hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions. Focusing on the role of the DNase I binding loop (D-loop) and the W-loop residues of actin in their interactions with S1, we found that the emission properties of acrylodan and the mobility of electron paramagnetic resonance spin labels attached to cysteine mutants of these residues change strongly and in a residue-specific manner upon S1 binding, consistent with the recently proposed direct contacts of these loops with S1. As documented in this study, the direct and indirect changes on actin induced by myosin are more extensive than known until now and attest to the importance of actin dynamics to actomyosin function.

The understanding of actin structure and function has been improved by comparing the atomic structure of G-actin, the model of the F-actin structure, and the properties of actin mutants. Several aspects of actin structure have been tested and good progress has been made in mapping its myosin-binding sites. The dynamic properties of actin and genetic evaluation of its cellular function are attracting increasing attention.

We show by high-resolution atomic force microscopy analysis that drebrin A (a major neuronal actin binding protein) induced F-actin structural and mechanical remodeling involves significant changes in helical twist and filament stiffness (+55% persistence length). These results provide evidence of a unique mechanical role of drebrin in the dendrites, contribute to current molecular-level understanding of the properties of the neuronal cytoskeleton, and reflect the role of biomechanics at the nanoscale, to modulate nanofilament-structure assemblies such as F-actin.

The nucleotide state of actin (ATP, ADP-P(i), or ADP) is known to impact its interactions with other actin molecules upon polymerization as well as with multiple actin binding proteins both in the monomeric and filamentous states of actin. Recently, molecular dynamics simulations predicted that a sequence located at the interface of subdomains 1 and 3 (W-loop; residues 165-172) changes from an unstructured loop to a beta-turn conformation upon ATP hydrolysis (Zheng, X., Diraviyam, K., and Sept, D. (2007) Biophys. J. 93, 1277-1283). This region participates directly in the binding to other subunits in F-actin as well as to cofilin, profilin, and WH2 domain proteins and, therefore, could contribute to the nucleotide sensitivity of these interactions. The present study demonstrates a reciprocal communication between the W-loop region and the nucleotide binding cleft on actin. Point mutagenesis of residues 167, 169, and 170 and their site-specific labeling significantly affect the nucleotide release from the cleft region, whereas the ATP/ADP switch alters the fluorescence of probes located in the W-loop. In the ADP-P(i) state, the W-loop adopts a conformation similar to that in the ATP state but different from the ADP state. Binding of latrunculin A to the nucleotide cleft favors the ATP-like conformation of the W-loop, whereas ADP-ribosylation of Arg-177 forces the W-loop into a conformation distinct from those in the ADP and ATP-states. Overall, our experimental data suggest that the W-loop of actin is a nucleotide sensor, which may contribute to the nucleotide state-dependent changes in F-actin and nucleotide state-modulated interactions of both G- and F-actin with actin-binding proteins.

The antiparallel dimer (APD) is a unique actin species, which can be detected in the early stages of actin polymerization. In this work, we introduce novel tools for examination of the effects of the APD on actin polymerization. We document that bifunctional methanothiosulfonate (MTS) reagents are an attractive alternative to the routinely used p-phenylene maleimide (pPDM) for APD detection, allowing for fast and efficient cross-linking under conditions of actin polymerization at neutral pH. We report also that pyrene-labeled yeast actin mutant A167C/C374A (C167PM) forms significant amounts of stable APD in solution, without chemical cross-linking or polymerization-affecting compounds, and that the kinetics of APD transformation and decay upon actin polymerization can be easily monitored. The dimerization of C167PM has been characterized in sedimentation equilibrium experiments (K(d) approximately 0.3 microM). This new system offers the advantage of assessing the effects of the APD under physiological conditions (pH, ionic strength, and Mg(2+) concentration) and testing for conformational transitions in the APD during nucleation-polymerization reactions or/and in the presence of actin-interacting factors. The results obtained using two different systems (C167PM actin and polylysine-induced polymerization of alpha-actin) show that the APD decays at a rate slower than that at which the filaments elongate, revealing its transient incorporation into filaments, and confirm that it inhibits the nucleation and elongation of actin filaments.

A synthetic peptide corresponding to a sequence 632–642 (S632–642) on the myosin subfragment 1 (S-1) heavy chain and spanning the 50 20 kDa junction of S-1 binds to actin in the presence and absence of S-1. The binding of 1.0 mole of peptide per actin causes almost complete inhibition of actomyosin ATPase activity and only partial inhibition of S-1 binding to actin. The binding of S632–642 to the N-terminal segment of actin is supported by competitive carbodiimide cross-linking of S-1 and S632–642 to actin and the catalytic properties of cross-linked acto-S-1 and actin-peptide complexes. These results show that the sequence 632–642 on S-1 is an autonomous binding site for actin and confirm the catalytic importance of its interactions with the N-terminal segment of actin.

The binding of myosin subfragment 1 (S-1) to actin in the presence of ATP and the acto-S-1 ATPase activities of acto-S-1 complexes were determined at 5 degrees C under conditions of partial saturation of actin, up to 90%, by antibodies against the first seven N-terminal residues on actin. The antibodies [Fab(1-7)] inhibited strongly the acto-S-1 ATPase and the binding of S-1 to actin in the presence of ATP at low concentrations of S-1, up to 25 microM. Further increases in S-1 concentration resulted in a partial and cooperative recovery of both the binding of S-1 to actin and the acto-S-1 ATPase while causing only limited displacement of Fab(1-7) from actin. The extent to which the binding and the ATPase activity were recovered depended on the saturation of actin by Fab(1-7). The combined amounts of S-1 and Fab binding to actin suggested that the activation of the myosin ATPase activity was due to actin free of Fab. Examination of the acto-S-1 ATPase activities as a function of S-1 bound to actin at different levels of actin saturation by Fab(1-7) revealed that the antibodies inhibited the activation of the bound myosin. Thus, the binding of antibodies to the N-terminal segment of actin can act to inhibit both the binding of S-1 to actin in the presence of ATP and a catalytic step in ATP hydrolysis by actomyosin. The implications of these results to the regulation of actomyosin interaction are discussed.

The conformational dynamics of filamentous actin (F-actin) is essential for the regulation and functions of cellular actin networks. The main contribution to F-actin dynamics and its multiple conformational states arises from the mobility and flexibility of the DNase I binding loop (D-loop; residues 40-50) on subdomain 2. Therefore, we explored the structural constraints on D-loop plasticity at the F-actin interprotomer space by probing its dynamic interactions with the hydrophobic loop (H-loop), the C-terminus, and the W-loop via mutational disulfide cross-linking. To this end, residues of the D-loop were mutated to cysteines on yeast actin with a C374A background. These mutants showed no major changes in their polymerization and nucleotide exchange properties compared to wild-type actin. Copper-catalyzed disulfide cross-linking was investigated in equimolar copolymers of cysteine mutants from the D-loop with either wild-type (C374) actin or mutant S265C/C374A (on the H-loop) or mutant F169C/C374A (on the W-loop). Remarkably, all tested residues of the D-loop could be cross-linked to residues 374, 265, and 169 by disulfide bonds, demonstrating the plasticity of the interprotomer region. However, each cross-link resulted in different effects on the filament structure, as detected by electron microscopy and light-scattering measurements. Disulfide cross-linking in the longitudinal orientation produced mostly no visible changes in filament morphology, whereas the cross-linking of D-loop residues45 to the H-loop, in the lateral direction, resulted in filament disruption and the presence of amorphous aggregates on electron microscopy images. A similar aggregation was also observed upon cross-linking the residues of the D-loop (41) to residue 169. The effects of disulfide cross-links on F-actin stability were only partially accounted for by the simulations of current F-actin models. Thus, our results present evidence for the high level of conformational plasticity in the interprotomer space and document the link between D-loop interactions and F-actin stability.

Caldesmon interacts with the NH2-terminal region of actin. It is now shown in airfuge centrifugation experiments that modification of the penultimate cysteine residue of actin significantly weakens its binding to caldesmon both in the presence and absence of tropomyosin. Furthermore, as revealed by fluorescence measurements, caldesmon increases the exposure of the COOH-terminal region of actin to the solvent. This effect of caldesmon, like its inhibitory effect on actomyosin ATPase activity, is enhanced in the presence of tropomyosin. Proteolytic removal of the last three COOH-terminal residues of actin, containing the modified cysteine residue, restores the normal binding between caldesmon and actin. These results establish a correlation between the binding of caldesmon to actin and the conformation of the COOH-terminal region of actin and suggest an indirect rather than direct interaction between caldesmon and this part of actin.

The binding of myosin subfragment 1 (S-1) to actin in the presence and absence of nucleotides was determined under conditions of partial saturation of actin, up to 80%, by Fab(1-7), the antibodies against the first seven N-terminal residues on actin. In the absence of nucleotides, the binding constant of S-1 to actin (2 x 10(7) M-1) was decreased by 1 order of magnitude by Fab(1-7). The binding of S-1 to actin caused only limited displacement of Fab, and between 30 and 50% of actin appeared to bind both proteins. In the presence of MgAMP.PNP, MgADP, and MgPPi and at low S-1 concentrations, the same antibodies caused a large decrease in the binding of S-1 to actin. However, the binding of S-1.nucleotide to actin in the presence of Fab(1-7) increased cooperatively with the increase in S-1 concentration. Also, in contrast to rigor conditions, there was no indication for the binding of Fab(1-7) and S-1.nucleotide to the same actin molecules. These results show a nucleotide-induced transition in the actomyosin interface, most likely related to the different roles of the N-terminal segment of actin in the binding of S-1 and S-1.nucleotide. The possible implications of these findings to the regulation of actomyosin interactions are discussed.

The polymerization of G-actin by myosin subfragment 1 (S-1) isozymes, S-1(A1) and S-1(A2), and their proteolytically cleaved forms was studied by light-scattering, fluorescence, and analytical ultracentrifugation techniques. As reported previously, S-1(A1) polymerized G-actin rapidly while S-1(A2) could hardly promote the assembly reaction (Chaussepied & Kasprzak, 1989a; Chen and Reisler, 1990). This difference between the isozymes of S-1 was traced to the very poor, if any, ability of G-actin-S-1(A2) complexes to nucleate the assembly of actin filaments. The formation of G-actin-S-1(A2) complexes was verified in sedimentation velocity experiments and by fluorescence measurements using pyrene-labeled actin. The G-actin-S-1(A2) complexes supported the growth of actin filaments and accelerated the polymerization of actin in solutions seeded with MgCl2-, KCl-, and S-1(A1)-generated nuclei. The growth rates of actin-S-1(A2) filaments were markedly slower than those for actin-S-1(A1) filaments. Proteolytic cleavage of S-1 isozymes at the 50/20-kDa junction of the heavy chain greatly decreased their binding to G-actin and thus inhibited the polymerization of actin by S-1(A1). These results are discussed in the context of G-actin-S-1 interactions.

Modifications of SH1 groups on isolated myosin subfragment 1 (S-1) and myosin in muscle fibers affect differently the acto-S-1 ATPase and the fiber properties. Consistent with the findings of earlier work on fibers, the modification of SH1 groups in relaxed myofibrils with phenylmaleimide caused a loss of their shortening. This loss paralleled the decrease in the Vmax of extracted myosin but was not linear with the extent of SH1 labeling. Strikingly, the decrease in Vmax of S-1 prepared from the modified myofibrils was directly proportional to the extent of SH1 labeling. The specificity of SH1 labeling in myofibrils was verified by ATPase activities, thiol titrations, radiolabeling experiments, and comparisons to myosin labeled on SH1 in solution. To test for intermolecular interactions in the myosin filaments and their contribution to the differences between S-1 and myosin, the catalytic properties of copolymers of myosin were examined. Copolymers of myosin and rod minifilaments were formed in 5 mM citrate-Tris (pH 8.0) buffer, and their homogeneity was verified by sedimentation velocity analysis. The inhibition of actomyosin ATPase by rod particles was related to the decrease in the Km value. When rod particles were replaced in these minifilaments by SH1-modified myosin, the ATPase of the copolymers was increased over that of the combined ATPases of the individual filaments. The actomyosin ATP turnover rates on the unmodified heads were increased severalfold by the modified heads.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The Gram-negative bacterium Vibrio cholerae is the causative agent of a severe diarrheal disease that afflicts three to five million persons annually, causing up to 200,000 deaths. Nearly all V. cholerae strains produce a large multifunctional-autoprocessing RTX toxin (MARTX Vc ), which contributes significantly to the pathogenesis of cholera in model systems. The actin cross-linking domain (ACD) of MARTX Vc directly catalyzes a covalent cross-linking of monomeric G-actin into oligomeric chains and causes cell rounding, but the nature of the cross-linked bond and the mechanism of the actin cytoskeleton disruption remained elusive. To elucidate the mechanism of ACD action and effect on actin, we identified the covalent cross-link bond between actin protomers using limited proteolysis, X-ray crystallography, and mass spectrometry. We report here that ACD catalyzes the formation of an intermolecular iso-peptide bond between residues E270 and K50 located in the hydrophobic and the DNaseI-binding loops of actin, respectively. Mutagenesis studies confirm that no other residues on actin can be cross-linked by ACD both in vitro and in vivo. This cross-linking locks actin protomers into an orientation different from that of F-actin, resulting in strong inhibition of actin polymerization. This report describes a microbial toxin mechanism acting via iso-peptide bond cross-linking between host proteins and is, to the best of our knowledge, the only known example of a peptide linkage between nonterminal glutamate and lysine side chains.

The role of the N-terminal segment of actin in myosin-induced polymerization of G-actin was studied by using peptide antibodies directed against the first seven N-terminal residues of alpha-skeletal actin. Light scattering, fluorescence, and analytical ultracentrifugation experiments showed that the Fab fragments of these antibodies inhibited the polymerization of G-actin by myosin subfragment 1 (S-1) by inhibiting the binding of these proteins to each other. Fluorescence measurements using actin labeled with pyrenyliodoacetamide revealed that Fab inhibited the initial step in the binding of S-1 to G-actin. It is deduced from these results and from other literature data that the initial contact between G-actin and S-1 involves residues 1-7 on actin and residues 633-642 on the S-1 heavy chain. This interaction appears to be of major importance for the binding of S-1 and G-actin. The presence of additional myosin contact sites on G-actin was indicated by concentration-dependent recovery of S-1 binding to G-actin without displacement of Fab. The reduced Fab inhibition of S-1 binding to polymerizing and polymerized actin is consistent with the tightening of acto-S-1 binding at these sites or the creation of new sites upon formation of F-actin.

Subtilisin cleaved actin was shown to retain several properties of intact actin including the binding of heavy meromyosin (HMM), the dissociation from HMM by ATP, and the activation of HMM ATPase activity. Similar Vmax but different Km values were obtained for acto-HMM ATPase with the cleaved and intact actins. The ATPase activity of HMM stimulated by copolymers of intact and cleaved actin showed a linear dependence on the fraction of intact actin in the copolymer. The most important difference between the intact and cleaved actin was observed in an in vitro motility assay for actin sliding movement over an HMM coated surface. Only 30% of the cleaved actin filaments appeared mobile in this assay and moreover, the velocity of the mobile filaments was approximately 30% that of intact actin filaments. These results suggest that the motility of actin filaments can be uncoupled from the activation of myosin ATPase activity and is dependent on the structural integrity of actin and perhaps, dynamic changes in the actin molecule.

The N-terminal segment of actin contains a cluster of acidic residues which are implicated in macromolecular interactions of this protein. In this work, the interrelationship between the N-terminal segment and the polymerization of actin was studied by using affinity-purified antibodies directed against the first seven N-terminal residues on alpha-skeletal actin (S alpha N). The Fab fragments of these antibodies showed equal affinities for G- and F-actin while the bivalent IgG bound preferentially to the polymerized actin. As monitored by pyrene fluorescence measurements, the binding of Fab to G-actin did not alter the kinetics of the MgCl2-induced polymerization; IgG accelerated this reaction considerably. Consistent with these observations, the binding of Fab to F-actin did not change its morphological appearance in electron micrographs and had no effect on the stability and the rate of dissociation of actin filaments. These results are discussed in terms of their implications to the spatial relationship between the N-terminal segment and the rest of the molecule and the context of the polymerization reaction of actin in vitro and in vivo.

Vibrio cholerae is a Gram-negative bacterial pathogen that exports enterotoxins, which alter host cells through a number of mechanisms resulting in diarrheal disease. Among the secreted toxins is the multifunctional, autoprocessing RTX toxin (MARTX(Vc)), which disrupts actin cytoskeleton by covalently cross-linking actin monomers into oligomers. The region of the toxin responsible for cross-linking activity is the actin cross-linking domain (ACD). In this study, we demonstrate unambiguously that ACD utilizes G- and not F-actin as a substrate for the cross-linking reaction and hydrolyzes one molecule of ATP per cross-linking event. Furthermore, major actin-binding proteins that regulate actin cytoskeleton in vivo do not block the cross-linking reaction in vitro. Cofilin inhibits the cross-linking of G- and F-actin, at a high mole ratio to actin but accelerates F-actin cross-linking at low mole ratios. DNase I completely blocks the cross-linking of actin, likely due to steric hindrance with one of the cross-linking sites on actin. In the context of the holotoxin, the inhibition of Rho by the Rho-inactivating domain of MARTX(Vc) (Sheahan, K. L., and Satchell, K. J. F. (2007) Cell. Microbiol. 9, 1324-1335) would accelerate F-actin depolymerization and provide G-actin, alone or in complex with actin-binding proteins, for cross-linking by ACD, ultimately leading to the observed rapid cell rounding.

International audience; Cofilin is a major cytoskeletal protein that binds to both monomeric actin (G-actin) and polymeric actin (F-actin) and is involved in microfilament dynamics. Although an atomic structure of the G-actin-cofilin complex does not exist, models of the complex have been built using molecular dynamics simulations, structural homology considerations, and synchrotron radiolytic footprinting data. The hydrophobic cleft between actin subdomains 1 and 3 and, alternatively, the cleft between actin subdomains 1 and 2 have been proposed as possible high-affinity cofilin binding sites. In this study, the proposed binding of cofilin to the subdomain 1/subdomain 3 region on G-actin has been probed using site-directed mutagenesis, fluorescence labeling, and chemical cross-linking, with yeast actin mutants containing single reactive cysteines in the actin hydrophobic cleft and with cofilin mutants carrying reactive cysteines in the regions predicted to bind to G-actin. Mass spectrometry analysis of the cross-linked complex revealed that cysteine 345 in subdomain 1 of mutant G-actin was cross-linked to native cysteine 62 on cofilin. A cofilin mutant that carried a cysteine substitution in the alpha 3-helix (residue 95) formed a cross-link with residue 144 in actin subdomain 3. Distance constraints imposed by these cross-links provide experimental evidence for cofilin binding between actin subdomains 1 and 3 and fit a corresponding docking-based structure of the complex. The cross-linking of the N-terminal region of recombinant yeast cofilin to actin residues 346 and 374 with dithio-bis-maleimidoethane (12.4 A) and via disulfide bond formation was also documented. This set of cross-linking data confirms the important role of the N-terminal segment of cofilin in interactions with G-actin.

Multiple crystal structures are reported of cross-linked actin dimers. Interactions that are conserved across crystal structures suggest detailed interactions that are likely to be present in F-actin filaments., The structure of actin in its monomeric form is known at high resolution, while the structure of filamentous F-actin is only understood at considerably lower resolution. Knowing pre­cisely how the monomers of actin fit together would lead to a deeper understanding of the dynamic behavior of the actin filament. Here, a series of crystal structures of actin dimers are reported which were prepared by cross-linking in either the longitudinal or the lateral direction in the filament state. Laterally cross-linked dimers, comprised of monomers belonging to different protofilaments, are found to adopt configurations in crystals that are not related to the native structure of filamentous actin. In contrast, multiple structures of longitudinal dimers consistently reveal the same interface between monomers within a single protofilament. The re­appearance of the same longitudinal interface in multiple crystal structures adds weight to arguments that the interface visualized is similar to that in actin filaments. Highly conserved atomic interactions involving residues 199–205 and 287–291 are highlighted.

The cytoskeletal protein, actin, has its structure and function regulated by cofilin. In the absence of an atomic resolution structure for the actin/cofilin complex, the mechanism of cofilin regulation is poorly understood. Theoretical studies based on the similarities of cofilin and gelsolin segment 1 proposed the cleft between subdomains 1 and 3 in actin as the cofilin binding site. We used radiolytic protein footprinting with mass spectrometry and molecular modeling to provide an atomic model of how cofilin binds to monomeric actin. Footprinting data suggest that cofilin binds to the cleft between subdomains 1 and 2 in actin and that cofilin induces further closure of the actin nucleotide cleft. Site-specific fluorescence data confirm these results. The model identifies key ionic and hydrophobic interactions at the binding interface, including hydrogen-bonding between His-87 of actin to Ser-89 of cofilin that may control the charge dependence of cofilin binding. This model and its implications fill an especially important niche in the actin field, owing to the fact that ongoing crystallization efforts of the actin/cofilin complex have so far failed. This 3D binary complex structure is derived from a combination of solution footprinting data and computational approaches and outlines a general method for determining the structure of such complexes.

Cofilin is essential for cell viability and for actin-based motility. Cofilin severs actin filaments, which enhances the dynamics of filament assembly. We investigated the mechanism of filament severing by cofilin with direct fluorescence microscopy observation of single actin filaments in real time. In cells, actin filaments are likely to be attached at multiple points along their length, and we found that attaching filaments in such a manner greatly increased the efficiency of filament severing by cofilin. Cofilin severing increased and then decreased with increasing concentration of cofilin. Together, these results indicate that cofilin severs the actin filament by a mechanism of allosteric and cooperative destabilization. Severing is more efficient when relaxation of this cofilin-induced instability of the actin filament is inhibited by restricting the flexibility of the filament. These conclusions have particular relevance to cofilin function during actin-based motility in cells and in synthetic systems.

To better understand the mechanism of actin filament (F-actin) bundling by polyamines, we have measured the onset of bundling as a function of polyamine concentration. Samples were centrifuged at low speeds to separate bundles from unbundled actin, and the relative amounts of actin in the pellet and supernatant were determined via gel electrophoresis, yielding a description of the bundling transition as a function of actin and polyamine concentrations. These experiments were carried out for two different polyamines, spermine (tetravalent) and spermidine (trivalent). We found that the threshold concentration of polyamine needed to bundle actin is independent of both actin concentration and Mg2+ concentration over a wide range in Mg2+ concentration. We also find that spermine in F-actin bundles is essentially invisible in solution-phase proton NMR, suggesting that it is bound so tightly to F-actin that it is immobilized.

Cofilin/ADF, beryllium fluoride complex (BeFx), and phalloidin have opposing effects on actin filament structure and dynamics. Cofilin/ADF decreases the stability of F-actin by enhancing disorder in subdomain 2, and by severing and accelerating the depolymerization of the filament. BeFx and phalloidin stabilize the subdomain 2 structure and decrease the critical concentration of actin, slowing the dissociation of monomers. Yeast cofilin, unlike some other members of the cofilin/ADF family, binds to F-actin in the presence of BeFx; however, the rate of its binding is strongly inhibited by BeFx and decreases with increasing pH. The inhibition of the cofilin binding rate increases with the time of BeFx incubation with F-actin, indicating the existence of two BeFx-F-actin complexes. Cofilin dissociates BeFx from the filament, while BeFx does not bind to F-actin saturated with cofilin, presumably because of the cofilin-induced changes in the nucleotide-binding cleft of F-actin. These changes are apparent from the increase in the fluorescence intensity of F-actin bound epsilon-ADP upon cofilin binding and a decrease in its accessibility to collisional quenchers. BeFx also affects the nucleotide-binding cleft of F-actin, as indicated by an increase in the fluorescence intensity of epsilon-ADP-F-actin. Phalloidin and cofilin inhibit, but do not exclude each other binding to their complexes with F-actin. Phalloidin promotes the dissociation of cofilin from F-actin and slowly reverses the cofilin-induced disorder in the DNase I binding loop of subdomain 2.

Cofilin plays an important role in actin turnover in cells by severing actin filaments and accelerating their depolymerization. The role of pH in the severing by cofilin was examined using fluorescence microscopy. To facilitate the imaging of actin filaments and to avoid the use of rhodamine phalloidin, which competes with cofilin, alpha-actin was labeled with tetramethylrhodamine cadaverine (TRC) at Gln41. The TRC-labeling inhibited actin treadmilling strongly, as measured by epsilonATP release. Cofilin binding, detected via an increase in light scattering, and the subsequent conformational change in filament structure, as detected by TRC fluorescence decay, occurred 2-3 times faster at pH 6.8 than at pH 8.0. In contrast, actin filaments severing by cofilin was pH-independent. The pH-independent severing by cofilin was confirmed using actin labeled at Cys374 with Oregon Green 488 maleimide. The depolymerization of actin by cofilin was faster at high pH.

Inorganic phosphate (Pi) and cofilin/actin depolymerizing factor proteins have opposite effects on actin filament structure and dynamics. Pi stabilizes the subdomain 2 in F-actin and decreases the critical concentration for actin polymerization. Conversely, cofilin enhances disorder in subdomain 2, increases the critical concentration, and accelerates actin treadmilling. Here, we report that Pi inhibits the rate, but not the extent of cofilin binding to actin filaments. This inhibition is also significant at physiological concentrations of Pi, and more pronounced at low pH. Cofilin prevents conformational changes in F-actin induced by Pi, even at high Pi concentrations, probably because allosteric changes in the nucleotide cleft decrease the affinity of Pi to F-actin. Cofilin induced allosteric changes in the nucleotide cleft of F-actin are also indicated by an increase in fluorescence emission and a decrease in the accessibility of etheno-ADP to collisional quenchers. These changes transform the nucleotide cleft of F-actin to G-actin-like. Pi regulation of cofilin binding and the cofilin regulation of Pi binding to F-actin can be important aspects of actin based cell motility.

ADF/cofilins are abundant actin binding proteins critical to the survival of eukaryotic cells. Most ADF/cofilins bind both G and F-actin, sever the filaments and accelerate their treadmilling. These effects are linked to rearrangements of interprotomer contacts, changes in the mean twist, and filament destabilization by ADF/cofilin. Paradoxically, it was reported that under certain in vitro and in vivo conditions cofilin may stabilize actin filaments and nucleate their formation. Here, we show that yeast cofilin and human muscle cofilin (cofilin-2) accelerate the nucleation and elongation of ADP-F-actin and stabilize such filaments. Moreover, cofilin rescues the polymerization of the assembly incompetent tethramethyl rhodamine (TMR)-actin and T203C/C374S yeast mutant actin. Filaments of cofilin-decorated TMR-actin and unlabeled actin are indistinguishable, as revealed by electron microscopy and three-dimensional reconstruction. Our data suggest that ADF/cofilins play an active role in establishing new interprotomer interfaces in F-actin that substitute for disrupted (as in TMR-actin and mutant actin) or weakened (as in ADP-actin) longitudinal contacts in filaments.

Using site-specific fluorescence probes and cross-linking we demonstrated that cofilin (ADF), a key regulator of actin cellular dynamics, weakens longitudinal contacts in F-actin in a cooperative manner. Differential scanning calorimetry detected a dual nature of cofilin effects on F-actin conformation. At sub-stoichiometric cofilin to actin ratios, cofilin stabilized sterically and non-cooperatively protomers at the points of attachment, and destabilized allosterically and cooperatively protomers in the cofilin-free parts of F-actin. This destabilizing effect had a long range, with one cofilin molecule affecting more than 100 protomers, and concentration-dependent amplitude that reached maximum at about 1:2 molar ratio of cofilin to actin. In contrast to existing models, our results suggest an allosteric mechanism of actin depolymerization by cofilin. We propose that cofilin is less likely to sever actin filaments at the points of attachment as thought previously. Instead, due to its dual structural effect, spontaneous fragmentation occurs most likely in cofilin-free segments of filaments weakened allosterically by nearby cofilin molecules.