The evolution and functions of avian and mammalian antipredator callsare well understood, which contrasts with a lack of progress in reptiles.Here, we present the first investigation of the functions of a distress call ina lizard. We studied Liolaemus chiliensis, which emits a short and complexhigh-pitched scream when it is subdued. We determined the behavioralresponses of two potential targets to these calls, conspecifics, and a snakepredator. Additionally, we tested whether the chemical environment(presence of chemical scents from conspecifics) modulates the lizards’responses to calls. Both the conspecifics and the predator responded to thedistress calls, which triggered a longer period of immobility in the lizardsand a reduction in exploratory behavior in the snake, as compared to awhite noise. In addition, the lizards in the arena with scents of conspecif-ics responded to distress calls and noise with more movements and escapeattempts. These results suggest that distress calls may enhance the survivalof L. chiliensis individuals.IntroductionMany birds and mammals emit calls when they areunder the risk of predation. These vocalizationsinclude alarm calls emitted when prey detect preda-tors and distress calls emitted when they are seized bypredators (Caro 2005). The distress calls may induce avariety of behavioral changes in conspecifics and/orpredators, which can enhance the survival probabili-ties of the prey and/or its conspecifics (H€ogstedt 1983;Neudorf & Sealy 2002; Caro 2005). These calls can becries for help, attracting conspecifics which may helpby attacking the predator (Branch & Freeberg 2012),or they may be warnings that help kin to escape frompredation (Rohwer et al. 1976). In addition, predatorscan be startled by distress calls (Wise et al. 1999;Neudorf & Sealy 2002), among other reasons, becausecalls may convey honest information about the defen-sive capabilities of the prey (Laiolo et al. 2004).Distress calls can also attract secondary predators,whose presence, or potential presence, may lead theprimary predator to release its prey in order to protectitself (H€ogstedt 1983; Koenig et al. 1991). Clearly,distress calls can have different functions that are notmutually exclusive (Rohwer et al. 1976; Perrone1980; Conover 1994; Branch & Freeberg 2012).The research on different types of antipredator callsdone on birds and mammals has allowed progress inthe understanding of the proximate and ultimatecauses involved in their evolution (e.g., Caro 2005;Zuberb€uhler 2009; Moller & Nielsen 2010; Gill & Bier-ema 2013). This contrasts with the lack of studies inother taxa that exhibit antipredator vocalizations,such as amphibians (Hodl & Gollmann 1986; Toledo &€Haddad 2009) and reptiles (Greene 1988). For lizards,there are no studies on the role of these vocalizationseven if many species vocalize under predation risk(see Labra et al. 2013). It is probable that lizards useconspecific calls to reduce their predation risk,because many species respond to the sounds associ-ated with predation even if they do not use sounds insocial interactions. For example, some species eaves-drop on the alarm calls of birds, which can trigger, ascompared to their songs, higher vigilance (Vitouseket al. 2007; Ito & Mori 2010) or increased camouflage(Ito et al. 2013). Other lizard species discriminatebetween vocalizations from predator and non-preda-tor bird species (Cantwell 2010) or modulate their