Search

Background: Historical epidemiological data indicate that Native American patients may have worse prostate cancer (PCa) characteristics than Caucasian patients (CAP). To test for cancer-specific mortality (CSM) differences among Native American vs. CAP, the most contemporary version of the SEER database (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database [2004-2016]) was used., Methods: Descriptives and time trend analyses focused on a combined cohort of 357,289 Caucasian and Native American PCa patients of all stages. After 1:4 propensity-score (PS) matching for stage, grade, and other patient characteristics, cumulative incidence plots, and competing-risks-regression-models (CRR) were used, with further stratification according to non-metastatic (T any N 0 M 0 ) vs. metastatic (T any N 1 and/or M 1 ) stages., Results: Native American patients accounted for 1804 (0.5%) of the study cohort. Native American patients had higher PSA (8 ng/ml vs. 6.3 ng/ml), higher rate of D'Amico high-risk PCa (30.8 vs. 24.8%), higher rate of T3/T4-PCa (5.5 vs. 3.7%), higher rate of N1 stage (4.5 vs. 2.8%), and higher rate of M1 stage (7.5 vs. 3.9%, all p < 0.001) than CAP. In T any N 0 M 0 patients after PS-matching, 10-year CSM was 5.7 vs. 6.2% in Native American vs. CAP. In T any N 1 and/or M 1 patients, 10-year CSM was 64.3 vs. 63.3% in Native American vs. CAP, (both p = 0.8). In CRR, Native American race did not represent an independent predictor of CSM., Conclusions: Native American patients have more unfavorable stage and grade at presentation. However, after adjustment for these characteristics, CSM in Native American patients is not higher than in CAP. In consequence, PCa prognosis does not differ between Native American and Caucasian race. Therefore, efforts should be made to diagnose PCa in Native Americans at an earlier and more favorable stage like in CAP.

Background: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend a pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) if a nomogram predicted risk of lymph node invasion (LNI) is ≥2%. We examined this and other thresholds, including nomogram validation., Methods: We examined records of 26,713 patients treated with RP and PLND between 2010 and 2013, within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Nomogram thresholds of 2-5% were tested and external validation was performed., Results: LNI was recorded in 4.7% of patients. Nomogram accuracy was 80.4% and maintained minimum accuracy of 75.6% in subgroup analyses, according to age, race, and nodal yield >10. With the NCCN recommended 2% nomogram threshold, PLND could be avoided in 22.3% of patients at the expense of missing 3.0% of individuals with LNI. Alternative thresholds of 3%, 4%, and 5% yielded respective PLND avoidance rates of 60.4%, 71.0%, and 79.8% at the expense of missing 17.8%, 27.2%, and 36.6% of patients with LNI. NCCN cut-off recommendation was best satisfied with a threshold of <2.6%, at which PLND could be avoided in 13,234 patients (49.5%) versus missing 141 patients with LNI (11.2%)., Conclusion: NCCN LNI nomogram remains accurate in contemporary patients. However, the 2% threshold appears to be too strict, since only 22.3% of PLNDs can be avoided, instead of the stipulated 47.7%. The optimal 2.6% threshold allows a higher rate of PLND avoidance (49.5%), at the cost of 11.2% missed instances of LNI, as recommended by NCCN guidelines. PATIENT SUMMARY. External validation in contemporary SEER prostate cancer patients showed that the NCCN nomogram remains accurate for predicting lymph node invasion and seems to be optimal at an alternative 2.6% threshold, with best ratio of avoided pelvic lymph node dissections (49.5%) and missed LNIs (11.2%), as recommended by NCCN guideline. Prostate 77:542-548, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objective: To externally validate the updated 2012 Partin Tables in contemporary North American patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) at community institutions., Materials and Methods: We examined records of 25,254 patients treated with RP and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) between 2010 and 2013, within the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. The ROC derived AUC assessed discriminant properties of the updated 2012 Partin Tables of organ confined disease (OC), extracapsular extension (ECE), seminal vesical invasion (SVI), and lymph node invasion (LNI). Calibration plots focused on calibration between predicted and observed rates., Results: Proportions of OC, ECE, SVI, and LNI at RP were 69.8%, 18.4%, 7.4%, and 4.4%, respectively. Accuracy for prediction of OC, ECE, SVI, and LNI was 70.4%, 59.9%, 72.9%, and 77.1%, respectively. In subgroup analyses in patients with nodal yield >10, accuracy for LNI prediction was 76.0%. Subgroup analyses in elderly patients and in African American patients revealed decreased accuracy for prediction of all four endpoints. Last but not least, SVI and LNI calibration plots showed excellent agreement, versus good agreement for OC (maximum underestimation of 10%) and poor agreement for ECE (maximum overestimation of 12%)., Conclusion: Taken together, the updated 2012 Partin Tables can be unequivocally endorsed for prediction of OC, SVI, and LNI in community-based patients with localized PCa. Conversely, ECE predictions failed to reach the minimum accuracy requirements of 70%. Prostate 77:105-113, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)