Search

Background Recent studies suggest that 5α-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) result in abnormal retinal anatomical alteration. Objective To compare age-related macular degeneration (AMD) incidence in BPH patients receiving 5ARIs or tamsulosin. Design Retrospective, population-based cohort study using new-user and active-comparator design. Setting General population. Subjects Males with BPH, newly receiving 5ARIs or tamsulosin from 2010 to 2018. Methods Data were extracted from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. We used Cox proportional hazards model with 1:4 propensity score (PS) matching, based on intention-to-treat analysis to determine the risk of incident AMD. Sensitivity analyses included an as-treated approach and weighting-based PS methods. We also separately reported the risks of incident AMD in patients receiving finasteride and dutasteride to determine risk differences among different 5ARIs. Results We included 13 586 5ARIs users (mean age: 69 years) and 54 344 tamsulosin users (mean age: 68.37 years). After a mean follow-up of 3.7 years, no differences were observed in the risk of incident AMD between 5ARIs and tamsulosin users [hazard ratio (HR): 1.06; 95% confidence intervals (95% CI): 0.98–1.15], with similar results from sensitivity analyses. However, increased risk of incident age-related macular degeneration was observed in patients receiving dutasteride [HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.02–1.25], but not in those receiving finasteride [HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.87–1.12], in the subgroup analyses. Conclusions We found no difference between 5ARIs and tamsulosin regarding the incidence of AMD in BPH patients. However, the risk profiles for AMD differed slightly between dutasteride and finasteride, suggesting that the potency of androgen inhibition is a factor related to AMD incidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness and safety of dutasteride 0.5 mg + tamsulosin 0.2 mg combination compared with tamsulosin 0.2 mg in Asian men with moderate-to-severe benign prostatic hyperplasia., Methods: A 4-week, single-blind, placebo, run-in was followed by a 2-year double-blind randomized controlled trial in men age ≥50 years with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia, International Prostate Symptom Score ≥12, prostate volume ≥30 cc, prostate-specific antigen ≥1.5 and ≤10 ng/mL, peak urinary flow >5 and ≤15 mL/s, and voided volume of ≥125 mL. Participants were randomized to oral daily dutasteride 0.5 mg + tamsulosin 0.2 mg combination or tamsulosin 0.2 mg. The primary efficacy end-point was change in International Prostate Symptom Score at year 2., Results: Data from 607 participants showed a significant reduction in International Prostate Symptom Score (P < 0.05) at month 24, along with greater improvements (P ≤ 0.006) in peak urinary flow at every assessment and significant prostate volume reduction at months 12 and 24 (P < 0.001) in the combination group. Combination therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of acute urinary retention or benign prostatic hyperplasia-related surgery (P = 0.012), primarily due to a significant reduction in the risk of acute urinary retention (P = 0.005). The safety and tolerability profile of combination therapy was consistent with the known profiles for the individual monotherapies., Conclusions: Dutasteride 0.5 mg + tamsulosin 0.2 mg combination therapy showed better clinical outcomes than tamsulosin 0.2 mg monotherapy, making it an effective and safe treatment option for Asian men with moderate-to-severe benign prostatic hyperplasia., (© 2018 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Objectives: Tamsulosin is an alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonist applied in treating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This study aimed to evaluate safety, efficacy and acceptance of newly formulated orally disintegrating tamsulosin tablets in Taiwanese patients with LUTS/BPH., Methods: This single center, non-comparative, observational study enrolled 45 male patients over age 50 years. All patients received 0.2 mg tamsulosin orally disintegrating tablets daily and were evaluated at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12 of the 12-week treatment period. Tamsulosin efficacy was evaluated by International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) with 7 questions on urinary symptoms and one disease-specific quality-of-life question, with scores ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 35 (highly symptomatic). Maximum flow rate (ml/s), voided volume (ml), flow time (s), and mean flow rate (ml/s) were measured. Danish prostatic symptom sexual function scale rated severity and associated concerns of erection quality, ejaculatory function and pain/discomfort were also assessed., Results: Patients' mean ± SD age was 62.47 ± 7.77 (range: 50-89) and mean ± SD I-PSS was 13.98 ± 5.50. Statistically significant changes from baseline were found in post-test I-PSS and quality of life (both P < 0.001). Mean ± SD I-PSS decreased from 14.30 ± 9.34 to 6.73 ± 0.88 at patients' final visit. Statistically significant increases in mean maximum flow rate and mean flow rate were found over 12-week study period (P < 0.05). No adverse events were reported. No significant differences were found in pulse, SBP/DBP or sexual function., Conclusion: Orally disintegrating tamsulosin tablets demonstrate acceptable safety and efficacy for acceptance and well tolerance by Taiwanese LUTS/BPH patients.