Search

Importance: Preventive drugs are often underused. Carotid intima-media thickness and carotid plaques are associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD), and their detection could possibly improve estimation of the likelihood of CVD and prescription of preventive drugs., Objective: To evaluate whether pictorial information on participants' asymptomatic atherosclerosis based on carotid ultrasonographic examinations to participants and their physicians had an effect on prescribing of lipid-lowering or antihypertensive drugs during the following 465 days., Design, Setting, and Participants: Visualization of Asymptomatic Atherosclerotic Disease for Optimum Cardiovascular Prevention is a pragmatic randomized clinical trial nested within the Västerbotten Intervention Program, a CVD screening and prevention program in Sweden with 60% to 70% participation rates and small social selection bias. A total of 4177 individuals aged 40, 50, or 60 years participating in the Västerbotten Intervention Program who had low to moderate risk of CVD were invited to enroll in this trial from April 29, 2013, to June 7, 2016. Prescriptions for all participants were monitored for 465 days after the intervention. Data analysis was conducted from December 6, 2019, to April 2, 2020., Interventions: Participants and their family physicians were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive or not receive pictorial information from carotid ultrasonographic determination of vascular age, assessed as carotid intima-media thickness and the presence of carotid plaques, combined with a follow-up call to participants by nurses., Main Outcomes and Measures: Two outcome measures of prescriptions of antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs within 465 days after ultrasonography was performed. Data obtained through intention-to-treat analysis are presented as proportions of individuals with a prescription among those who had no baseline prescription for agents from these drug classes., Results: Of the 4177 individuals invited to enroll, 3532 participants were randomized and included in the analysis; 1870 (52.9%) were women, 2278 (64.5%) were aged 60 years, 978 (27.7%) were 50 years, and 276 (7.8%) were 40 years. First prescriptions of lipid-lowering drugs were higher in the intervention group vs the control group among men (118 of 639 [18.5%] vs 38 of 692 [5.5%]; P < .001) and women (126 of 804 [15.5%] vs 38 of 817 [4.7%]; P < .001). There were no significant differences in the proportion with prescription of antihypertensive drugs in the intervention vs control groups after ultrasonography among men (58 of 482 [12.0%] vs 56 of 528 [10.6%]; P = .47) and women (60 of 612 [9.8%] vs 64 of 615 [10.4%]; P = .73)., Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this trial demonstrate that provision of pictorial information on vascular age and carotid plaques based on the results of ultrasonographic examination increased physician prescription of lipid-lowering drugs but not antihypertensive drugs within the following 465 days., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01849575.

Background: In the treatment of coronary heart disease, secondary prevention goals are still often unmet and poor adherence to prescribed drugs has been suggested as one of the reasons. We aimed to investigate whether pharmaceutical care by a pharmacist at the cardiology clinic trained in motivational interviewing improves clinical outcomes and patient adherence., Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled, outcomes-blinded trial designed to compare pharmaceutical care follow-up with standard care. After standard follow-up at the cardiology clinic, patients in the intervention group were seen by a clinical pharmacist two to five times as required over seven months. Pharmacists were trained to use motivational interviewing in the consultations and they tailored their support to each patient's clinical needs and beliefs about medicines. The primary study end-point was the proportion of patients who reached the treatment goal for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 12 months after discharge. The key secondary outcome was patient adherence to lipid-lowering therapy at 15 months after discharge, and other secondary outcomes were the effects on patient adherence to other preventive drugs, systolic blood pressure, disease-specific quality of life, and healthcare use., Results: 316 patients were included. The proportion of patients who reached the target for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were 37.0% in the intervention group and 44.2% in the control group (P = .263). More intervention than control patients were adherent to cholesterol-lowering drugs (88 vs 77%; P = .033) and aspirin (97 vs 91%; P = .036) but not to beta-blocking agents or renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors., Conclusions: Our intervention had no positive effects on risk factors for CHD, but it increased patient adherence. Further investigation of the intervention process is needed to explore the difference in results between patient adherence and medication effects. Longer follow-up of healthcare use and mortality will determine if the increased adherence per se eventually will have a meaningful effect on patient health., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02102503, 03/04/2014 retrospectively registered., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Context/objective: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of statins and other lipid-lowering agents on the development of Graves orbitopathy (GO) in patients with newly diagnosed Graves disease (GD)., Methods: Our sample included the full adult population of individuals living in Sweden with newly diagnosed GD between 2005 and 2018 (n = 34 894). We compared the GO incidence in statin users (n = 5574) and nonusers (n = 34 409) by applying Cox regression with a time-varying exposure variable. We adjusted for age, sex, and treatment for hyperthyroidism in the multivariate analyses., Results: Periods of nonusage lasted for a median of 4.3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 1.2-8.4), whereas periods of usage lasted for a median of 4.7 years (IQR 2.0-8.1). Among statin users, 77.1% had used simvastatin, 28.9% atorvastatin, and 8.2% had used other statins. Statin users were found to be significantly less likely to develop GO. In the main analysis based on the full cohort, the unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 0.74 (CI 0.65-0.84, P < .001), whereas full adjustment altered the effect to 0.87 (CI 0.76-1.00, P = .04). The main results were largely driven by men; the fully adjusted HR was 0.78 (CI 0.58-1.04, P = .09) for men and 0.91 (CI 0.79-1.06, P = .24) for women. Lipid-lowering agents other than statins did not exhibit a similar protective effect., Conclusion: In newly diagnosed patients with GD, treatment with statins may protect against the development of GO. Statins should be investigated in a clinical trial as a preventive treatment for GO in newly diagnosed patients with GD., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims/hypothesis: Dyslipidemia is an important modifiable risk factor and lipid-lowering treatment (LLT) is essential to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Studies in type 2 diabetes indicate that low adherence to statin therapy is a barrier to reach full protective potential, and less is known in type 1 diabetes (T1D). The aim was to assess risk of CVD by adherence and nonpersistence to LLT in T1D.  METHOD: A population-based study with a retrospective longitudinal design was conducted between 2006 and 2010, with follow-up until December 2013. In total, 6192 adult individuals with T1D, initiating LLT between 2006 and 2010, were included. Information on LLT, socioeconomic characteristics, comorbidities and cardiovascular events were collected. After 18 months, refill adherence was estimated by calculating medication possession ratio (MPR). Nonpersistence was defined as being without medicines on hand for at least 180 days. Individuals were thereafter followed until CVD, death or end of follow-up in December 2013. Cox regression analyses were performed to assess adherence level and nonpersistence of LLT as predictor of CVD. Analyses were adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors and socioeconomic status.   RESULTS: Mean MPR was 72%, 52% of the participants had an MPR above 80% and 27% discontinued LLT. There were 637 nonfatal and 58 fatal CVD events, mean follow-up 3.6 and 3.9 years, respectively. MPR above 80% was associated with reduced risk for nonfatal CVD compared with lower MPR, HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.93)). For fatal CVD, results indicated a negative effect of high adherence but the association did not reach statistical significance, HR 1.96 (0.96 to 4.01). Individuals discontinuing LLT had higher risk of nonfatal CVD, HR 1.43 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.73).  CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In T1D, the risk for nonfatal CVD was lower among individuals with high adherence and higher among those discontinuing LLT within 18 months. It is important to evaluate and emphasize adherence to prescribed LLT at clinical visits to achieve treatment goals and reduce the risk of CVD., Competing Interests: Competing interests: KAS is employed by AstraZeneca. However, the views expressed in this study are her own and not those of AstraZeneca. SG has received personal fees (lecture fees and research grants) from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi. KE-O has received personal lecture fees from Eli Lilly and Abbott. BE has received personal fees for lectures and serving on advisory boards from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Navamedic, Novo Nordisk and RLS Global and research grants from Sanofi. CH has received personal lecture fees from Eli Lilly., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of two forms of secondary preventive follow-up on the association between education level and levels of blood pressure (BP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) after stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA)., Methods: We included a population-based cohort of 771 stroke and TIA patients randomly assigned (1:1) to secondary preventive follow-up within primary health care (control) or nurse-led, telephone-based follow-up (intervention) between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2013, as part of the NAILED (nurse-based age-independent intervention to limit evolution of disease) stroke risk factor trial. We compared BP and LDL-C levels 12 months after hospital discharge in relation to education level (low, ≤10 years; high, >10 years) separately for the intervention and control groups., Results: Among controls, systolic BP (SBP) decreased only among the highly educated (-2.5 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.2 to -4.8), whereas LDL-C increased in the low-education group (0.2 mmol/L, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.3). At 12 months, controls with low education not more than 70 years of age had higher SBP than controls of the same age with high education (5.8 mm Hg, 95% CI 1.0 to 10.6). In contrast, SBP in the intervention group decreased similarly regardless of education level, LDL-C decreased among those with low education (-0.3 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.2 to -0.4) and, in the subgroup not more than 70 years old, low-educated participants had lower LDL-C at 12 months than those with high education (0.3 mmol/L, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.5)., Conclusions: Nurse-led, telephone-based secondary preventive follow-up led to comparable improvements in BP across education groups, while routine follow-up disfavored those with low education., Trial Registration: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN23868518 , June 19, 2012 - Retrospectively registered.

Background: Management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) encompasses intensive glycaemic control, along with treatment of comorbidities and complications to handle the increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Improved control of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) with lipid-lowering medications is associated with reduced CVD risk in T2DM patients. Thus, treatment guidelines recommend lipid-lowering medications for T2DM patients with LDL-C above risk-associated thresholds. This study aimed to assess healthcare provider adherence to guidelines regarding lipid-lowering medication prescription among T2DM patients and to analyse factors associated with lipid-lowering medication prescription., Methods: Observations in 2007 - 2014 for T2DM patients age ≥ 18 were collected from the Swedish National Diabetes Register. Observations were excluded if they lacked information about LDL-C, lipid-lowering medication prescription or CVD. Observations with established CVD were attributed to secondary prevention; remaining observations were attributed to primary prevention. The analyses included primary and secondary prevention observations with LDL-C above risk-associated thresholds (LDL-C ≥ 2.5 mmol/l and LDL-C ≥ 1.8 mmol/l respectively). Guideline adherence was analysed as the probability of prescribing lipid-lowering medications using mixed-effect model regression adjusted for potential confounders. Factors associated with prescribing lipid-lowering medications were analysed for patient and healthcare provider characteristics using mixed-effect model regression and odds ratio., Results: A total of 1,204,376 observations from 322,046 patients reported by 1352 healthcare providers were included. Primary prevention accounted for 63%; 52% were men, mean age was 64 and mean LDL-C was 3.4 mmol/l. For secondary prevention, 60% were men, mean age was 72 and mean LDL-C was 2.7 mmol/l. During 2007-2014, guideline adherence ranged from 36 to 47% for primary prevention and 59 to 69% for secondary prevention. In general, concomitant prescription of diabetes medications, antiplatelets and antihypertensives along with smoking and specialised care were associated with higher prescription of lipid-lowering medications. Patients age ≥ 80 were associated with lower prescription of lipid-lowering medications. Higher prescription was associated with longer diabetes duration in primary prevention and men in secondary prevention., Conclusions: Adherence to treatment guidelines levelled off after an initial increase in both prevention groups. Lipid-lowering medication prescription was based on individualised CVD risk.

Register-based studies have indicated that men with impaired fertility are at higher risk for developing various adult-onset diseases than fertile men. The majority of men undergoing ICSI treatment are sub-fertile and since they are in contact with the health care system, these men are well suited as target for preventive measures. Our study included all men (N = 459 766) who had fathered children in Sweden between 2006 and 2016. Swedish registry data was used for obtaining information regarding conception method and defining three groups of fathers - ICSI -treated, IVF - treated and non IVF/ICSI. By sourcing data from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, we specifically searched for information regarding prescription and usage of at least one prescription for diabetes mellitus, hypertension (HT) or dyslipidemia to serve as a proxy for metabolic disease among the study groups. If all three types of medicine were prescribed, the patient was considered as having metabolic syndrome. Our results indicate male partners in couples who became parents using ICSI to be at higher risk for being treated for hypertension (HR = 1.15 95% CI: 1.06-1.24, p = 0.001) and metabolic syndrome (HR = 1.28 95% CI: 1.01-1.58, p = 0.042) when compared to non IVF/ICSI men.

The objective of this prospective cohort study was to describe real-life use of lipid-lowering drugs and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target-attainment rates 1 year after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). LDL-C was recorded at hospital admission for AMI and at follow-up at 2 and 12 months after AMI in 17,236 patients in the Swedish heart registry, SWEDEHEART, from 2004 through 2009. Lipid-lowering treatments were identified using the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. More than 90% of patients received statins after AMI. Simvastatin ≤40 mg was used by 80% of patients at discharge and at 2 months and 68% at 1 year after AMI. Intensive statin therapy (LDL-C-lowering capacity >40%) was prescribed for 8.4%, 11.9%, and 12.2% at these time points, and combinations of statin/ezetimibe for 1.1%, 2.8%, and 5.0%, respectively. The LDL-C target of <2.5 mmol/L (97 mg/dl) was achieved in 74.5% of patients at 2 months and 72.3% at 12 months after AMI. Treatment was intensified for only 21.3% of patients with LDL-C above target at 2 months. In multivariate analysis, higher LDL-C levels at admission and at 2 months correlated to increased risk for under treatment at 12 months after AMI. In conclusion, statin treatment after AMI in Sweden has become standard, but titration to reach recommended LDL-C levels is still suboptimal. Strategies to further improve implementation of guidelines are needed., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: We investigated whether the risk estimates of General Practitioners (GPs) and their treatment decisions mutually influence each other and whether factors not related to the patient's risk, such as the gender and length in clinical practice, interact., Background: The quantitative assessment of the absolute risk of developing coronary heart disease (CHD) and the decision to start treatment with lipid-lowering drugs are crucial tasks in the primary prevention of CHD., Methods: Nine clinical vignettes, four rated high-risk and five rated low-risk according to the Framingham equation, were mailed to three groups of 90 randomly selected GPs in Stockholm. One group (R) was asked to estimate the risk of CHD within 10 years on a visual analogue scale. A second group (R1D) was asked to estimate the risk and to specify whether they would recommend a pharmacological lipid-lowering treatment. A third group (D) only to indicate whether they would recommend treatment., Results: Response rate ranged from 42.2% to 45.6%. The median risk estimates were higher in the R group than in the R1D group (difference not statistically significant). R1D group showed higher proportions of correct decisions to start treatment compared with the R group (86.2% versus 77.5%, P50.19). More correct decisions were made by female doctors (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.19-2.61, P50.004) and by less experienced doctors (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99, P50.016)., Conclusions: The task of making CHD risk estimates and the task of making decisions whether to start lipid-lowering treatment do not seem to influence each other. The gender of physicians and the length of clinical experience seem to affect treatment decisions. Female GPs and less experienced GPs are more likely to make correct decisions. However, the relatively low response rate to the questionnaires may limit the generalizability of these results.

Aim: Risk factors for development of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are the same as for atherosclerotic coronary or precerebral disease, and patients with PAD have a high prevalence of concomitant atherosclerotic disease in coronary and precerebral arteries. However, these patients are still less likely to receive appropriate pharmacological secondary prevention than patients with coronary artery disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment of risk factors for patients undergoing open or endovascular surgery for PAD in our vascular department., Methods: We evaluated pharmacological treatment, lipid levels, blood pressures (BP), and smoking habits one month postoperatively in 953 patients (age [mean ± SD] 71±11 years, 524 [55%] men) undergoing open or endovascular surgical interventions for PAD., Results: We found that 89% of patients received statins and 98% received either platelet aggregation inhibitors or anticoagulants at the one month follow-up. Four hundred nineteen (70%) patients had achieved target level <4.5 mmol/L for s-total cholesterol, and 394 (67%) target level <2.5 mmol/L for s-LDL cholesterol. BP (mean ± SD) was 144±22/76±12 mmHg, systolic and diastolic target BPs (<140 mmHg and <90 mmHg, respectively) were achieved in 482 (51%) and 887 (95%) patients, respectively. The proportion of active smokers had been reduced from 41% preoperatively to 24% at the one month follow-up (P<0.0001)., Conclusion: Even though our practice has improved, there is still room for better follow-up of pharmacological risk factor treatment in PAD patients.

Background: Secondary prevention after stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) is essential in order to reduce morbidity and mortality. Secondary stroke prevention studies have, however, been fairly small, or performed as clinical trials with non-representative patient selection. Long-term follow-up data is also limited. A nurse-led follow-up for risk factor improvement may be effective but the evidence is limited. The aims of this study are to perform an adequately sized, nurse-led, long-term secondary preventive follow-up with a population-based inclusion of stroke and TIA patients. The focus will be on blood pressure and lipid control as well as tobacco use and physical activity., Methods: A randomized, controlled, long-term, population-based trial with two parallel groups. The patients will be included during the initial hospital stay. Important outcome variables are sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressure, LDL cholesterol and total cholesterol. Outcomes will be measured after 12, 24 and 36 months of follow-up. Trained nurses will manage the intervention group with a focus on reaching set treatment goals as soon as possible. The control group will receive usual care. At least 200 patients will be included in each group, in order to reliably detect a difference in mean systolic blood pressure of 5 mmHg. This sample size is also adequate for detection of clinically meaningful group differences in the other outcomes., Discussion: This study will test the hypothesis that a nurse-led, long-term follow-up after stroke with a focus on reaching set treatment goals as soon as possible, is an effective secondary preventive method. If proven effective, this method could be implemented in general practice at a low cost., Trial Registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN23868518.

Objectives: Statins are a lipid-lowering treatment, prescribed frequently to prevent cardiovascular events. The objective of this study was to explore how doctors anticipate the effect of statins and what factors are associated with their willingness to initiate treatment., Methods: A total of 330 Swedish cardiologists, internists and general practitioners were asked to consider two hypothetical patient cases, one with and one without previous coronary heart disease. Based on these cases, the respondents answered questions about their willingness to initiate treatment and what effects they might expect. The expectation of effect was assessed in two ways: (1) the absolute risk reduction of myocardial infarction in 1000 patients treated with statins for 5 years; and (2) statins' average effect on increased life expectancy. The doctors' beliefs about absolute risk reduction were compared with results from clinical trials., Results: Most doctors had a suboptimal expectation about absolute risk reduction; only about one-third had expectations in the range supported by evidence-based data. There were different views about statins' ability to prolong life: that is, average gain in life expectancy due to treatment was believed to be 2 years in the primary patient case, and 3 years in the second patient case. The doctors' beliefs about statins' ability to prolong life were associated significantly with their willingness to initiate treatment., Conclusion: The overall results imply that doctors have varying and suboptimal understanding of the effect of statins. This may inhibit the goal of integrating clinical research into clinical practice., (© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Background: Type 2 diabetes and diabetic dyslipidemia are high-risk conditions for cardiovascular disease. However, the description of the distribution of blood lipids in diabetic patients has not been based on population-based surveys. The aim of this study was to describe diabetic dyslipidemia in a large unselected sample of patients from the Swedish National Diabetes Register., Methods: Blood lipid profiles and clinical characteristics in 75,048 type 2 diabetic patients (57% men) were studied., Results: Pronounced hypertriglyceridemia (triglycerides >4.0mmol/l) was seen in 3.4% of the patients. Total cholesterol (TC), LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) and non-HDL-C were generally higher, and LDL-C/HDL-C and Non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratios were lower in women. Mean TC, LDL-C as well as HDL-C values were lower in patients treated with lipid-lowering agents, whereas triglycerides was higher than in the untreated patients. In patients not treated with lipid-lowering agents all blood lipids increased in women and decreased in men (except HDL-C) at higher ages. Patients with LDL-C/HDL-C ratio ≥ 3 were slightly younger, less frequently used lipid-lowering drugs and had not so often a history of coronary heart disease or stroke., Conclusion: The distribution of blood lipids in this large sample of unselected type 2 diabetic patients challenges the previous conception of diabetic dyslipidemia, and calls for new studies to explain the roles of LDL-C and HDL-C as strong cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes.

The awareness and control of cardiovascular risk factors other than blood pressure in hypertensive subjects in primary healthcare is not well described. This was examined by data extraction from electronic records from a random sample (115 women and 85 men) corresponding to two-thirds of all hypertensive subjects within a well-defined geographic area in Sweden. Target blood pressure (<140/90 mmHg, <130/80 mmHg if diabetes or kidney disease) was achieved in 27%, and lipid levels (total and LDL-cholesterol <5 and <3.0 mmol/l, respectively) in 42%. Beta-blockers were the most common antihypertensive drug class; 39% were given lipid lowering drugs. The distributions of antihypertensive and lipid lowering drugs were similar across gender and age groups. Patient records often contained information on body mass index, lipid levels, diabetes, left ventricular hypertrophy, microalbuminuria, and smoking habits (reported in 89%, 89%, 73%, 67%, 62% and 61%), but rarely on physical exercise, family history, concurrent cardiovascular disease or alcohol habits (reported in 47%, 46%, 39% and 18%). In conclusion, hypertensive patients in primary healthcare do not have well controlled blood pressure and lipids. The awareness and documentation of several cardiovascular risk factors is low. Improvement in risk assessment and treatment may have substantial effects on prognosis.

Purpose: To investigate the association between socioeconomic position and use of lipid-lowering drugs and ACE-inhibitors after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) when simultaneously considering participation in the national quality register RIKS-HIA (Register of Information and Knowledge about Swedish Heart Intensive care Admissions), age, sex and previous hospitalizations of the patients., Methods: Population-based prospective cohort study included all 1346 AMI patients cared in the county of Scania, Sweden during 2006 of whom 1061 were register at the RIKS-HIA. Treatment with lipid-lowering and ACE-inhibiting therapy in relation to income was investigated with Cox and logistic regression modelling., Results: In the whole population of AMI patients, high income patients had a higher adherence to guidelines for pharmacological secondary prevention than low income patients (HR(lipid-lowering drug): 1.29; 95%CI: 1.12-1.49 and HR(ACE-inhibitor therapy): 1.22; 95%CI: 1.04-1.43). Among RIKS-HIA participants, patients with high income presented a better adherence to lipid-lowering treatment than patients with low income (HR: 1.15; 95%CI: 0.98-1.34)., Conclusion: Our investigation reveals that the Swedish goal of access to health care on equal terms and according to needs is still not fully accomplished. Moreover, since this pattern of inequity in pharmacological secondary prevention may lead to the recurrence of heart disease, these inequities are not only a matter of fairness and social justice, but also a potential (and modifiable) source of ineffectiveness and inefficiency in health care.

Objective: To determine cardiovascular comorbidities and use of cardiovascular disease preventive drugs in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), with special attention to sex differences., Design: A cross-sectional point-prevalence study., Patients: A population sample of patients that are 60-90 years old., Setting: Primary care areas in four Swedish regions., Main Outcome Measures: Prevalence of PAD stages, comorbidities and medication use., Results: The prevalence of any type of PAD was 18.0% (range 16-20), of asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease (APAD) was 11.1% (range 9-13), intermittent claudication was 6.8% (range 6.5-7.1), and of critical limb ischemia (CLI) was 1.2% (range 1.0-1.5). APAD and CLI were more common in women. Statins were used by 17.5% (range 16.9-18.2), 29.4% (range 29.0-30.1), and 30.3% (range 29.9-30.8) of the patients with APAD, intermittent claudication, and CLI, respectively, and antiplatelet therapy was reported by 34.1% (range 33.7-34.3), 47.6% (range 47.3-47.9), and 60.2% (range 59.1-60.7). The odds ratio for having APAD was 1.7 (range 1.2-2.4) for women with a smoking history of 10 years in relation to nonsmokers. This association was observed only in men who had smoked for at least 30 years or more. Preventive drug use was more common in men with PAD. Compared with women they had an odds ratio of 1.3 (range 1.1-1.5) for lipid-lowering therapy, 1.3 (range 1.0-1.7) for [beta]-blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and 1.5 (range 1.2-1.9) for antiplatelet therapy., Conclusion: The patients' risk factor profiles differed among the PAD stages. Smoking duration already seemed to be a risk factor for women with PAD after 10 years of smoking, as compared with 30 years for men, and fewer women reported use of preventive medication. These observations may partly explain the sex differences in prevalence that were observed.

Objective: To assess the use of lipid-lowering therapy in patients with known coronary heart disease (CHD), cerebrovascular disease or diabetes in a community-based population in Sweden considering expert recommendations., Methods: A random sample of individuals aged > or =40 years who were surveyed in 1993-1994 were revisited 10 years later during 2003-2004 (n = 724). A clinical investigation focused on cardiovascular risk including serum total cholesterol. Information on medical history and current medication was collected in structured interviews., Results: Eighty-two patients (11.3%) reported a history of CHD, including 51 men and 31 women. Fifty-three patients fulfilled criteria for treatment and most of them (85%) were on lipid-lowering therapy. A higher fraction of women were treated; however only 13% of them reached target cholesterol levels compared to 37% of the men (P < 0.001). Sixty-five subjects (9.0%) had diabetes and/or a previous stroke (29 men, 36 women) but no previous CHD. Patients with CHD were more likely to be treated compared to patients with diabetes and/or stroke but no CHD (85.0 vs. 28.5%, OR 6.0, 95% CI 2.2-16.9, P = 0.01). In a total of 79 participants (10.9%) who were on lipid-lowering therapy, women reached a total serum cholesterol level below 5.0 mmol/L less often than men (26.3 vs. 63.4%, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: A considerable proportion of patients in primary care were untreated despite current guidelines on lipid-lowering therapy. Treatment outcome in women was less efficient compared with men. Strategies to improve pharmacological treatment in these patients should be developed.

Background: To evaluate potential sex differences, this study aimed to investigate blood pressure and lipid control and other risk factors for cardiovascular disease in treated hypertensive (tHT) patients from primary healthcare., Design and Methods: This cross-sectional survey of tHT patients was carried out between 2002 and 2005 by 264 primary care physicians from Sweden who consecutively recruited 6537 tHT patients (48% men and 52% women) from medical records., Results: tHT men more often reached the treatment goal for systolic/diastolic blood pressure, less than 140/90 mmHg, than tHT women (30 vs. 26%, P<0.01). Men had lower systolic blood pressure than women, however, women had lower diastolic blood pressure and higher pulse pressure. More tHT women had total cholesterol>or=5.0 mmol/l than corresponding men (75 vs. 64% P<0.001). Men more often had diabetes (25 vs. 20% P<0.001), left ventricular hypertrophy (20 vs. 16% P<0.001), and microalbuminuria (24 vs. 16% P<0.001). Women were more often treated with diuretics (64 vs. 48%) and beta-receptor blockers (54 vs. 51%), and men more often treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (27 vs. 18%), calcium channel blockers (34 vs. 26%), and lipid-lowering drugs (34 vs. 29%)., Conclusion: A need still exists for more intensified treatment of elevated blood pressure and hypercholesterolemia, especially in women. In hypertensives of both sexes, smoking and other risk factors also need to be addressed to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease.

Background and Objective: The establishment of national guidelines is one approach to creating equity in terms of access to care, and both internationally and in Sweden, guidelines have been developed for coronary heart disease. We have analysed drug treatment in Sweden according to national guidelines after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The aim was to investigate whether there are differences between population groups according to sex, education, country of birth and diabetes., Methods: Information was obtained from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register on drugs dispensed between July and October 2005 for incident cases of AMI during the period 2003-2004 (n=28,168). Data on socio-economic and demographic conditions were included. Dispensed drugs after AMI were compared to the recommended drug treatment according to Swedish and European guidelines--acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), beta-blockers, lipid-lowering drugs and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors)., Results: We found that, in general, there were only small differences between the sexes and between educational groups. The greatest differences were found in comparisons between regions of birth. In particular, foreign-born patients resident in Sweden but originally from outside the EU25 countries used fewer drugs than Swedish-born patients. The OR (odds ratio) for ASA was 0.73 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-0.85], for beta-blockers, 0.72 (0.63-0.83), for lipid-lowering drugs, 0.75 (0.65-0.86) and for ACE inhibitors, 0.76 (0.67-0.86)., Conclusions: In general, we found only slight differences--or none at all--between population groups in terms of drug treatment after AMI. Only among immigrants from outside the EU25 countries was there a tendency towards a lesser use of the recommended drugs according to the national guidelines.

Purpose: To determine the prevalence of purchase of prescribed antihypertensive and/or serum lipid-reducing pharmaceutical preparations among different age groups, from the age of 45, in the Swedish population. Further, to calculate the percentage of the population, from the age of 60, who purchased these pharmaceuticals without having had a circulatory diagnosis in the Hospital Discharge Register the last 7 years, or having purchased nitrate vasodilators, as an attempt to estimate the proportion of primary preventive treatments., Methods: A cross-sectional study, of individual data on prescriptions for antihypertensives (C02-C03, C07-C09) and serum lipid-reducing agents (C10), dispensed from July to December 2005 for the Swedish population. Data were obtained from the new Swedish Prescribed Drugs Register. The data were related to population statistics, and linked to data on diagnoses of cardiovascular disease (I00-I99), from the Swedish Hospital Discharge Register 1998-2004. Data on individuals with purchase of antihypertensive or serum lipid-reducing agents, but without a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease, were also linked to purchase of nitrate vasodilators (C01D)., Results: Among Swedes of 60 years and above, 53% purchased antihypertensive or serum lipid-reducing pharmaceuticals, and 30% purchased the pharmaceuticals without having been hospitalized for a coronary or cerebrovascular event during the previous 7 years, or having purchased prescribed nitrate vasodilators during 6 months., Conclusion: Over half of the Swedish senior population purchased prescribed antihypertensive or serum lipid-reducing drugs during 6 months in 2005. The magnitude of the prevalence points to the importance of intensified follow-up of both adverse effects and of effectiveness of these drugs.

Background: Less than half of patients in Scandinavian societies achieve target cholesterol values established by consensus coronary prevention panels., Methods and Results: Using logistic regression analysis, we determined that patients not at consensus cholesterol goals after 3 months of treatment using lipid-lowering medications were significantly more likely to achieve these goals at 12 months if they were treated with an active management strategy (changes in lipid-lowering therapy within 3 months), had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, or initiated lipid-lowering more recently, compared with their counterparts without these factors., Conclusion: An active management strategy is associated with a higher probability of achieving treatment goals in patients not at goal after 3 months following treatment initiation.

Objectives: To explore time trends in population total cholesterol., Design and Setting: Five population-based cross-sectional surveys, 1986-2004 in the northern Sweden MONICA study included 8827 men and women., Results: Age-adjusted cholesterol level declined in men, 25-64 years old, from 6.38 to 5.78 mmol L(-1) and in women from 6.32 to 5.51 mmol L(-1). Between 1994 and 2004, subjects 65-74 years old were included, and their levels also decreased, in men from 6.35 to 5.76 mmol L(-1) and in women from 7.11 to 6.24 mmol L(-1). The decrease was continuous over surveys and age groups, except in young and middle-aged men where no further decline was found after 1999. Cohorts born 1920-1939 showed decreased cholesterol over the period, whilst no change was noted for those born thereafter. In 2004, one-fourth of men and one-third of women 25-74 years achieved levels below 5.0 mmol L(-1). Subjects with low educational level, body mass index > or =25 or smokers all had higher cholesterol levels which persisted during the 18-year period. In 2004, the 9% who used lipid-lowering drugs are estimated to contribute, at most, to 0.13 mmol L(-1) lower cholesterol in the population., Conclusion: Large decreases in cholesterol levels occurred in the 18-year period. Less smoking may contribute to, and increasing obesity attenuate, this trend whilst lipid-lowering drugs have had little effect until recently. Socio-economic inequalities persist.

Background: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is one of the most common genetic metabolic disorders and is associated with a high risk of premature coronary heart disease. Primary prevention directed at lifestyle changes, combined with preventive medical treatment, is the most important way to reduce the risk of coronary heart disease in individuals with FH. Knowledge about the condition and adherence to drug treatment may facilitate reaching treatment goals., Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe disease knowledge and adherence to treatment in patients with FH., Subjects and Methods: Seventy-four patients, more than 18 years of age, with FH were asked to participate. A questionnaire on disease knowledge about FH and adherence to drug treatment was sent to the patients. Response rate was 92% (n = 68). Drug treatment, laboratory results, blood pressure, and smoking were also documented., Results: Most patients knew about cholesterol, prevention, and the reason for drug treatment but were less informed about the risk of genetic transmission and family history. No significant correlation was found between knowledge and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. A significant, negative correlation between adherence and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was found (r = -.354, P < .01)., Conclusions: Patients with FH had scant understanding about the risk of genetic transmission and family history. High adherence to drug prescription has significant correlation to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level.

Background: There is substantial evidence that treatment with lipid-lowering agents can decrease cardiovascular morbidity and total mortality in patients with elevated serum lipid values and/or prior ischaemic heart disease. However, only a minority of these high-risk patients are believed to receive treatment, and among those who do receive pharmaceutical treatment the majority do not reach the therapeutic goal. Our goal was to investigate if this translates to a higher risk of cardiovascular events in real clinical practice., Design: A retrospective cohort study using linkage of electronic medical records, the Swedish national inpatient registry and cause of death registry was performed, enrolling a total of 4976 patients who received treatment with a lipid-lowering agent at any time between 1 January 1993 and 1 December 2001., Methods: Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the impact of goal attainment along with potential confounding factors., Results: Patients who reached treatment goals were 24% less likely to suffer a cardiovascular event (relative risk: 0.76, 95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.96) than patients who did not reach treatment goals. A substantial proportion of patients treated with lipid-lowering agents do not achieve the treatment goals., Conclusions: Failure to reach treatment goals translates into a higher risk of cardiovascular events, and it is thus of importance to ensure that patients reach goals.

Objectives: This investigation was undertaken to study the costs of a Case Method Learning (CML)-supported lipid-lowering strategy in secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD) in primary care., Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial in primary care with an additional external specialist control group in Södertälje, Stockholm County, Sweden, included 255 consecutive patients with CAD. Guidelines were mailed to all general practitioners (GPs; n=54) and presented at a common lecture. GPs who were randomized to the intervention group participated in recurrent CML dialogues at their primary health-care centers during a 2-year period. A locally well-known cardiologist served as a facilitator. Assessment of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was performed at baseline and after 2 years. Analysis according to intention-to-treat-intervention and control groups (n=88)--was based on group affiliation at baseline. The marginal cost of lipid lowering comprised increased cost of lipid-lowering drugs in the intervention group compared with the primary care control group, cost of attendance of the GP's in the intervention group, and cost of time for preparation, travel, and seminars of the facilitator. Costs are as of 2002 with an exchange rate 1 U.S. dollar = 9.5 SEK (Swedish Crowns)., Results: Patients in the primary care intervention group had their LDL cholesterol reduced by 0.5 (confidence interval [CI], 0.1-0.9) mmol/L compared with the primary care control group (p < .05). No change occurred in controls. LDL cholesterol in the external specialist control group decreased by 0.6 (CI, 0.4-0.8) mmol/L. The cost of the educational intervention represented only 2 percent of the drug cost. The cost of lipid lowering in the intervention group, including the cost of the educational intervention, was actually lower than that of patients treated at the specialist clinic--106 U.S. dollar per mmol decrease in LDL cholesterol in the intervention group and 153 U.S. dollar per mmol decrease in LDL cholesterol in the specialist group. EuroQol 5D Index, which gives an estimate of global health-related quality of life, was 0.80 (CI, 0.75-0.85) in the present cohort., Conclusions: The additional cost of CML was only 2 percent of the drug cost. Assuming the same gain in life expectancy per millimole decrease in LDL cholesterol as in the 4S-study gives a cost per gained quality-adjusted life year of U.S. dollar 24,000. This finding indicates that the CML-supported lipid-lowering strategy is cost-effective. The low cost of CML in primary care should probably warrant its use in the improvement of the quality of care in other major chronic diseases.

Background: Differences in therapy and outcome among hospitals have been reported, but these studies have seldom used adjustment for differences in patient characteristics. The objective was to investigate the differences in treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) among different hospitals within 1 country and the possible causes and outcomes of these differences., Methods: Prospective cohort study using data from the Register of Information and Knowledge about Swedish Heart Intensive care Admissions (RIKS-HIA) on 32,954 consecutive primary admissions of patients with AMI admitted to the intensive coronary care units of 67 Swedish hospitals in 1999-2000. An activity index was calculated for each hospital based on the hospital's ranking regarding proportion of performed examination or given therapy among the AMI patients., Results: After adjustment for 24 background characteristics, there were few significant deviations among hospitals in the proportion treated with acute reperfusion, antiplatelets, beta-blockers, or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. However, 3- to 10-fold differences existed among hospitals in the proportion of patients treated with intravenous beta-blockers, intravenous nitroglycerin, intravenous or subcutaneous anticoagulants, and lipid-lowering medication, and even larger discrepancies in echocardiography and revascularization within 14 days. There was a strong (r = 0.69, P < .001) correlation between hospital activity index between the years and a correlation between the hospital's activity index and 1-year mortality (r = -0.30, P = .014). There was no correlation between hospital size and activity index., Conclusions: Even after adjustment for differences in patient characteristics, there are differences between the hospital treatment cultures for patients with AMI that persists over time. Concerning everywhere-available treatment options, the treatment activity is independent of the size of the center. A more active treatment tradition is associated with a lower short- and long-term mortality in AMI patients.

Aim: To compare various health-related aspects of quality of life during long-term follow-up after admission to hospital due to acute chest pain in a city university hospital and a county hospital., Methods: This was a retrospective survey of all chest pain patients > or = 30 years of age at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, covering an area with 706 inhabitants per km2 and at Uddevalla County Hospital, Uddevalla, covering an area with 34 inhabitants per km2 over a period of six months. After 30 months all patients alive were approached with a questionnaire in which they were asked about various aspects of health-related quality of life and use of medication., Results: In all, 1,813 patients in the city hospital and 804 patients in the county hospital took part in the survey. The mortality and the overall proportion of patients requiring rehospitalization was similar in the two cohorts. Thirty months after onset of symptoms there was a difference between the two study populations. Patients in the county hospital smoked less frequently (p = 0.004). They tended to have less problems with chest pain at rest (p < 0.05) and dyspnoea at slight physical exercise (p = 0.01). Furthermore, they had less emotional symptoms (p = 0.003) and their state of health caused fewer problems when doing housekeeping (p = 0.008). Differences with regard to emotional symptoms and problems when doing housekeeping were particularly observed among women, whereas smoking habits differed only among men., Conclusion: When comparing patients admitted to hospital with acute chest pain in a city university hospital and a county hospital after 30 months some differences appeared. Patients in the county hospital appeared to suffer from less symptoms than patients in the city hospital. This was particularly observed among women. The mechanisms behind these observations are not clear.

Objective: To monitor glycemic control, treatable risk factors, and treatment profile for quality assessment of diabetes care on a national scale., Research Design and Methods: Four samples of 23,546, 32,903, 30,311, and 29,769 patients with diabetes (1996-1999) were studied based on a repeated national screening and quality assessment of diabetes care by the National Diabetes Register, Sweden, with participation of both hospitals and primary health care. Clinical characteristics included were age, sex, diabetes duration and treatment, glycemic control (HbA(1c)), office blood pressure (BP), BMI, smoking habits, and use of lipid-lowering drugs in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes., Results: Favorable decreases of mean HbA(1c) and BP values were registered during the 4-year study period for both type 1 (HbA(1c) 7.5-7.3% and BP 130/75-130/74 mmHg) and type 2 diabetic patients (HbA(1c) 7.0-6.7% and BP 151/82-147/80 mmHg). Treatment aims of HbA(1c) and BP levels were also achieved in increasing proportions for type 1 (HbA(1c) <7.5%: 50-58% and BP

Objective: The aim of the present study was to assess the role of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system and lipids in predicting the carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in type 2 diabetes., Research Design and Methods: A total of 239 type 2 diabetic participants in the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) Study (76 women) aged 50-75 years were examined before fenofibrate intervention. Patients underwent carotid ultrasonography for determination of IMT. IGF-I, IGF binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1), IGFBP-3, cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B (apoB), lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), glucose, HbA(1c), and C-peptide were measured in fasting samples. Patients were divided in groups without (n = 168) and with (n = 71) clinical cardiovascular disease (CVD)., Results: Partial correlations adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and diabetes duration showed an inverse association of IGFBP-1 with C-peptide (r = -0. 24, P = 0.018) and with maximal IMT (r = -0.42, P < 0.001), whereas IGF I and IGFBP-3 correlated positively with several risk-promoting lipid parameters. In linear regression analysis controlling for age, sex, BMI, diabetes duration, and presence or absence of oral antihyperglycemic or insulin medication, determinants of IMT were age, IGFBP-1, pulse pressure, Lp(a), diabetes duration, and insulin treatment. IGFBP-1 persisted in the model for subjects with CVD., Conclusions: In summary, a decrease in IGFBP-1 is a marker of carotid IMT thickening in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Background: The entire risk factor profile should be taken into account when considering initiating cholesterol lowering drug treatment. Recent treatment guidelines are therefore based on the absolute risk of coronary heart disease. We estimated at what coronary risk it is cost-effective to initiate cholesterol lowering drug treatment in primary prevention for men and women of different ages in Sweden., Methods: The cost-effectiveness was estimated as the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained of cholesterol lowering drug treatment. Treatment was assumed to lower the risk of coronary heart disease by 31%. The analysis was carried out from a societal perspective including both direct and indirect costs of the intervention and morbidity, and the full future costs of decreased mortality. The coronary risk, in a Markov model of coronary heart disease, was raised until the cost per QALY gained corresponded to a specific threshold value per QALY gained. Three different threshold values were used: $40,000, $60,000 and $100,000 per QALY gained., Results: The risk cut-off value for when treatment is cost-effective varied with age and gender. If society is willing to pay $60,000 to gain a QALY it was cost-effective to initiate treatment if the 5-year-risk of coronary heart disease exceeded 2.4% for 35-year-old men, 4.6% for 50-year-old men, and 10.4% for 70-year-old men. The corresponding risk cut-off values for women were 2.0%, 3.5% and 9.1%., Conclusions: The results can serve as a basis for treatment guidelines based on cost-effectiveness.

Objective: To perform an ecological study in an effort to generate questions concerning the preventive impact of various cardiovascular drugs on mortality from stroke and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) in the community, and to explore the association between sales of nitrates and mortality from stroke and IHD., Methods: Out-patient drug utilization (sales) of blood pressure lowering drugs, lipid lowering drugs and nitrates were categorized in four groups of equal size by quartiles and compared with mortality from IHD and stroke, using the group of municipalities with the lowest utilization as reference, from 1989 to 1993 in 283 of Sweden's 288 municipalities, by Poisson regression. Adjustments were made for population size, age and gender proportions, the utilization rate of cardiovascular drugs other than the tested drug group and location of the municipality., Results: Compared with the group of municipalities with the lowest sales and adjusting only for population size, mortality from IHD and stroke increased with the extent of utilization of blood pressure lowering drugs and nitrates. In contrast, mortality decreased with increased utilization of lipid lowering drugs. After further adjustments by percentage of men, age structure, geographical location (mid-points) of the municipalities, and, as a proxy for cardiovascular disease, the sales of cardiovascular drugs other than the tested drug group, the increased risk associated with blood pressure lowering drugs disappeared, and there was a dose-response association between sales of diuretics and old antihypertensives and decreasing mortality, sales of nitrates continued to be associated with an increased risk, and the low mortality risk associated with sales of lipid lowering drugs persisted., Conclusion: Lipid lowering drugs may have a preventive impact in the general population, but the preventive impact of blood pressure lowering drugs, with the exception of diuretics and old antihypertensives, may be low in many municipalities. The safety of nitrates needs more investigation at the individual level.

Aim: To describe variations by age, sex, symptom severity and hospital region in the use of various medications amongst patients with stable angina pectoris who are candidates for coronary revascularization., Patients: Patients (n = 2030) with chronic stable angina pectoris participating in a national survey evaluating the appropriateness of the use of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)., Methods: As part of a national study of the appropriateness of coronary revascularization, data were prospectively collected on patients referred for consideration of coronary revascularization to seven of the eight public Swedish heart centres that performed approximately 92% of all bypass operations in Sweden in 1994., Results: Amongst all patients 76% were treated with beta blockers, 41% with calcium antagonists and 71% with long-acting nitrates and 70% were treated with at least two of these three drugs. Eighty-two per cent of the patients used aspirin and 14% lipid-lowering drugs. According to logistic regression analysis, with medication as the dependent variable and independent variables of age, sex, angina functional class, findings at exercise test, history of various diseases and region in Sweden where the investigation took place, the most consistent factor explaining the use of various medications was found to be geographical region. A previous history of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was also associated with the use of all drugs and age was associated with all with the exception of beta blockers. Sex was not an independent factor explaining the use of any of the drugs., Conclusion: In a national survey including patients with stable angina pectoris who are potential candidates for coronary revascularization, the most important predictor for the use of various medications was the geographical region in which the investigation took place.

In order to compare attitudes and management concerning hyperlipidaemia and risk factors for coronary heart disease among doctors in northern and in southern Europe, a questionnaire study was undertaken among doctors in primary health care and departments of internal medicine in Sicily and Stockholm. The regions differed in culture and health-care structure. Guidelines were similar, but screening of healthy individuals was recommended in Sicily, and not in Sweden. One hundred and fifty-three general practitioners in Sicily and 120 in Stockholm, 211 internists in Sicily and 83 in Stockholm participated. Main outcome measures were management policies for investigation and treatment and also attitudes. Routine lipid checks at first visits were done by few doctors in Stockholm but by a majority in Sicily (p < 0.001); in the presence of general cardiovascular risk factors (other than heredity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and hypertension), routine checks were carried out more often by both general practitioners (p < 0.001) and internists (p < 0.005) in Stockholm. Drug treatment was initiated at lower cholesterol levels for secondary and primary intervention, cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular risk factors and hereditary hyperlipidaemia by both groups in Sicily (p < 0.001), as was dietary treatment. Secondary prevention was considered important by all groups, but primary prevention only by Sicilian doctors. We concluded that there were differences in views and management practice between doctors in Sicily and in Stockholm on the investigation and treatment of patients with hyperlipidaemia. Doctors tested lipids at first visits in Sicily but not in Stockholm. Treatment was initiated at lower levels of cholesterol in Sicily.

Objective: To compare the overall utilisation pattern of lipid-lowering drugs between 1990 and 1994 in Australia, Finland, Italy, Norway and Sweden as well as the pattern of use with respect to age and gender in Italy and Sweden., Methods: Data were retrieved from regulatory authorities in each country for the 5-year period and analysed according to the ATC/DDD methodology (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification/Defined Daily Doses). Utilisation was calculated as the DDDs for 1000 inhabitants per day for all drugs of the ATC category B04 (serum lipid-reducing agents). Data from Sweden and Italy were also compared with respect to gender and age., Results: In 1994, Australia demonstrated the highest degree of utilisation (11.9 DDD) and the Nordic Countries the lowest (Sweden 5.6; Norway 4.9; Finland 4.0). In all countries except Italy, a steady increase was observed; in Italy, utilisation of these drugs reached a maximum in 1992 (11.5 DDD), but then underwent a reduction which was caused by restrictions in the reimbursement status in 1993 (10.4) and 1994 (6.7). Administration of statins increased in all countries, becoming the most used group of the B04 class. In 1988, the number of different drugs listed by each national health service ranged from 4 (Norway) to 16 (Italy); in 1994 it ranged from 6 (Norway) to 9 (Sweden). Analysis with respect to gender showed the opposite pattern in Sweden (males 4.6 and females 3.3 in 1992; 6.2 and 4.5, respectively, in 1994) than in Italy (males 10.8 and females 17.8 in 1992; 6.4 and 9.2, respectively, in 1994). Exposure was highest in people aged 60-69 years in both countries, followed by age group 50-59 in Sweden and 70-79 in Italy., Conclusions: Large variations in the utilisation of lipid-lowering drugs exist between countries, with Australia and Italy much higher than others. Of the drugs in the ATC category B04, the use of statins predominates in all countries, but to varying degrees. The large difference in the degree of drug utilisation with respect to age and gender between Italy and Sweden suggests major deviations from evidence-based medicine.

Objective: To describe and compare the distribution of prescribed drugs in diabetic patients between 1992 and 1995., Methods: Two cross-sectional surveys of a random selection of medical records of diabetic patients, from three community health centres (CHCs) in the Stockholm metropolitan area, were carried out. The age of the subjects ranged from 20 to 84 years. The number of prescriptions of pharmaceutical preparations given to the diabetic patients was noted, as well as classification of the diabetes, the metabolic outcome, and concomitant hypertension., Results: Between 1992 and 1995, the use of oral antidiabetics increased significantly from 43 to 57% of the patients and the rate of treatment with diet only decreased from 30 to 20%. Combination treatment with oral drugs and insulin rose significantly from 1 to 8% of the patients. However, the greatest increase observed between 1992 and 1995 concerns cardiovascular drugs. The prescription rate of ACE inhibitors increased from 5 to 21%, of loop diuretics from 19 to 28%, of ASA from 9 to 21%, and of lipid-lowering agents from 1 to 7%. There was also a considerable variation between the three CHCs. Despite the more aggressive diabetic treatment strategies, the metabolic state was unchanged and unsatisfactory for 40-50% of the patients., Conclusions: There have been major changes towards more active pharmacological treatment regarding antidiabetic, cardiovascular, and lipid-lowering agents.

The objective was to study the effect of "academic group detailing" on the prescribing of lipid-lowering drugs in Swedish primary care. A randomized controlled trial was conducted, randomization being by group. Groups of doctors at 134 community health centres were randomly allocated to an intervention and a control group. The 67 intervention health centres were offered four sessions, conducted by a pharmacist, with group information on guidelines for the management of hyperlipidaemia. The number of prescriptions of lipid-lowering drugs per month increased in the intervention health centres and the increase was statistically different from the corresponding change in the control health centres among women in the age group 30-65 years (p = 0.03). The prescription of first-line lipid-lowering drugs increased by 20% in the intervention health centres (p = 0.03). "Academic group detailing" by pharmacists to primary care doctors can be an effective method for influencing prescribing practices.