1. Glucokinase Deficit Prevalence in Women With Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Matter of Screening Selection.
- Author
-
Bitterman O, Giuliani C, Festa C, and Napoli A
- Subjects
- Adult, Biomarkers analysis, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 blood, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 enzymology, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 genetics, Diabetes, Gestational blood, Diabetes, Gestational enzymology, Diabetes, Gestational genetics, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Genetic Testing, Glucokinase genetics, Humans, Italy epidemiology, Pregnancy, Pregnancy in Diabetics blood, Pregnancy in Diabetics enzymology, Pregnancy in Diabetics genetics, Prevalence, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 epidemiology, Diabetes, Gestational epidemiology, Glucokinase deficiency, Mutation, Pregnancy in Diabetics epidemiology
- Abstract
Introduction: The prevalence among pregnant women with diabetes of monogenic diabetes due to glucokinase deficit (GCK-MODY) varies from 0 to 80% in different studies, based on the chosen selection criteria for genetic test. New pregnancy-specific Screening Criteria (NSC), validated on an Anglo-Celtic pregnant cohort, have been proposed and include pre-pregnancy BMI <25 kg/m
2 and fasting glycemia >99 mg/dl. Our aim was to estimate the prevalence of GCK-MODY and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of NSC in our population of women with diabetes in pregnancy. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively selected from our database of 468 diabetic pregnant patients in Sant'Andrea Hospital, in Rome, from 2010 to 2018, all the women who received a genetic test for GCK deficit because of specific clinical features. We estimated the prevalence of GCK-MODY among tested women and the minimum prevalence in our entire population with non-autoimmune diabetes. We evaluated diagnostic performance of NSC on the tested cohort and estimated the eligibility to genetic test based on NSC in the entire population. Results: A total of 409 patients had diabetes in pregnancy, excluding those with autoimmune diabetes; 21 patients have been tested for GCK-MODY, 8 have been positive and 13 have been negative (2 of them had HNF1-alfa mutations and 1 had HNF4-alfa mutation). We found no significant differences in clinical features between positive and negative groups except for fasting glycemia, which was higher in the positive group. The minimum prevalence of monogenic diabetes in our population was 2.4%. The minimum prevalence of GCK-MODY was 1.95%. In the tested cohort, the prevalence of GCK-MODY was 38%. In this group, NSC sensitivity is 87% and specificity is 30%, positive predictive value is 43%, and negative predictive value is 80%. Applying NSC on the entire population of women with non-autoimmune diabetes in pregnancy, 41 patients (10%) would be eligible for genetic test; considering a fasting glycemia >92 mg/dl, 85 patients (20.7%) would be eligible. Discussion: In our population, NSC have good sensitivity but low specificity, probably because there are many GDM with GCK-MODY like features. It is mandatory to define selective criteria with a good diagnostic performance on Italian population, to avoid unnecessary genetic tests., (Copyright © 2020 Bitterman, Giuliani, Festa and Napoli.)- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF