Search

The article discusses problems in the psychiatric evaluation of criminal offenders by forensic psychiatrists, particularly with regard to the prediction of future criminal behavior pursuant to German criminal and correctional law concerning involuntary treatment, civil commitment, and preventive detention. The authors outlines reasons for errors in the assessment of potential recidivists, especially methodological problems with psychiatric evaluations. They also offer some professional guidance for psychiatrists and encourage greater collaboration between psychiatrists and criminologists.

Copyright of Monatsschrift fuer Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Using a cross-sectional data set of 837 male adolescents (346 local Germans, 375 ethnic German immigrants from the countries of the Former Soviet Union (average length of residence = 7.6 years), 52 first-generation (= foreign born, average length of residence = 9.2 years) and 64 second-generation immigrants (= born in Germany) from other origins such as Turkey, Former Yugoslavia or Afghanistan) aged 15.4 years, this article brings together acculturation research with research on behavior problems in non-immigrant youth. Male immigrants reported higher numbers of delinquent acts pursued in the last 12 months than local boys. First-generation immigrants from mostly Muslim backgrounds show the highest amount of problem behavior. In spite of these differences, comparisons of structural equation models show that the prediction of delinquency is about the same (delinquent beliefs and friends, clique membership, parental monitoring, and language problems) for all four groups. Applying stepwise regression analyses, most of the culture-related variance in boys' delinquency is explained by the same set of predictors with delinquent beliefs and parental violence being the most powerful markers for the differences between the groups. The discussion sheds light on the living situation of immigrant youth in Germany and why delinquent beliefs may be of central importance to understanding the differences between local and immigrant youth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents the findings of a study conducted on child delinquency in Germany. It defines child delinquency as the commission of criminal offenses committed by children up to and including age 13. It mentions that age of 14 is considered as the age of criminal responsibility. It reveals that offenses against criminal norms are categorized as socially deviant behavior in terms of criminology and sociology. It discusses the epidemiological study conducted on child delinquency.