Search

This report describes the objectives, design, and methods of the Munich Diagnostic and Predictor Study of Dizziness, a prospective study investigating diagnostic subgroups, correlates, and predictors of dizziness that is not sufficiently explained medically but clearly related to a psychiatric disorder. All patients presenting at the Integrated Centre for Research and Treatment of Vertigo, Balance and Ocular Motor Disorders at the University Hospital Großhadern in Munich, Germany, are investigated during their first-time visit. The study consists of a baseline and two follow-up assessment points at 6 and 12 months. At the baseline assessment point, all participants complete self-rated questionnaires concerning dizziness, depression, anxiety, dissociative and traumatic experiences, somatization, body sensations and perception, cognitions, attachment, personality, quality of life and experiences with the health care system. Additionally, a structured clinical interview is conducted to assess mental disorders. Then, the neurologists complete questionnaires regarding the subjective doctor-patient relationship and to document the somatic diagnoses and results. The follow-up measurements consist of self-rated questionnaires. This study aims to improve the diagnosis and treatment of patients who suffer from dizziness related to a psychiatric disorder and who are often severely impaired in their working and daily lives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Dizziness and comorbid anxiety may cause severe disability of patients with vestibulopathy, but can be addressed effectively with rehabilitation. For an individually adapted treatment, a structured assessment is needed. The Vertigo Symptom Scale (VSS) with two subscales assessing vertigo symptoms (VSS-VER) and associated symptoms (VSS-AA) might be used for this purpose. As there was no validated VSS available in German, the aim of the study was the translation and cross-cultural adaptation in German (VSS-G) and the investigation of its reliability, internal and external validity. Methods: The VSS was translated into German according to recognized guidelines. Psychometric properties were tested on 52 healthy controls and 202 participants with vestibulopathy. Internal validity and reliability were investigated with factor analysis, Cronbach's α and ICC estimations. Discriminant validity was analysed with the Mann-Whitney-U-Test between patients and controls and the ROC-Curve. Convergent validity was estimated with the correlation with the Hospital Anxiety Subscale (HADS-A), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and frequency of dizziness. Results: Internal validity: factor analysis confirmed the structure of two subscales. Reliability: VSS-G: α = 0.904 and ICC (CI) =0.926 (0.826, 0.965). Discriminant validity: VSS-VER differentiate patients and controls ROC (CI) =0.99 (0.98, 1.00). Convergent validity: VSS-G correlates with DHI (r = 0.554) and frequency (T = 0.317). HADS-A correlates with VSS-AA (r = 0.452) but not with VSS-VER (r = 0.186). Conclusions: The VSS-G showed satisfactory psychometric properties to assess the severity of vertigo or vertigo related symptoms. The VSS-VER can differentiate between healthy subjects and patients with vestibular disorders. The VSS-AA showed some screening properties with high sensitivity for patients with abnormal anxiety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]