1. Efficacy of rehabilitation with different approaches of implant-supported full-arch prosthetic designs: A systematic review.
- Author
-
Ramanauskaite, Ausra, Becker, Kathrin, Wolfart, Stefan, Lukman, Fanya, and Schwarz, Frank
- Subjects
DENTAL implants ,JAW diseases ,TOOTH loss ,META-analysis ,PERIODONTITIS ,SYSTEMATIC reviews ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,PROSTHESIS design & construction ,PERI-implantitis ,DISEASE risk factors - Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of different types of rehabilitation with fixed or removable full-arch implant-supported prosthesis designs in terms of implant loss and success in patients with at least one edentulous jaw, with tooth loss mainly due to periodontitis. Materials and methods: Clinical studies with at least 12 months reporting on implant loss and implant success were searched. Meta-analysis was conducted to estimate cumulative implant loss considering different prostheses designs. Results: A total of 11 studies with unclear to low risk of bias were included in the analysis. Estimated cumulative implant loss for fixed prostheses within 1 year and 5 years was 0.64% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31%-1.31%) and 1.85% (95% CI: 0.85%-3.95%), respectively. The corresponding values for removable prostheses amounted to 0.71% (95% CI: 0.22%-2.28%) and 4.45% (95% CI: 2.48%-7.85%). Peri-implantitis affected 10%-50% of the patients restored with implant-supported fixed prostheses. Conclusions: Based on the limited low-quality data, the present analysis points to a low and similar cumulative implant loss within 1 year for patients with tooth loss mainly due to stage IV periodontitis restored with either removable or fixed implantsupported full-arch prosthesis. At 5 years of functioning, there was a tendency for better outcomes using fixed designs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF