Search

Acute liver failure (ALF) is an acute liver dysfunction with coagulopathy and HE in a patient with no known liver disease. As ALF is rare and large clinical trials are lacking, the level of evidence regarding its management is low-moderate, favoring heterogeneous clinical practice. In this international multicenter survey study, we aimed to investigate the current practice and management of patients with ALF. An online survey targeting physicians who care for patients with ALF was developed by the International Liver Transplantation Society ALF Special-Interest Group. The survey focused on the management and liver transplantation (LT) practices of ALF. Survey questions were summarized overall and by geographic region. A total of 267 physicians completed the survey, with a survey response rate of 21.36%. Centers from all continents were represented. More than 90% of physicians specialized in either transplant hepatology/surgery or anesthesiology/critical care. Two hundred fifty-two (94.4%) respondents' institutions offered LT. A total of 76.8% of respondents' centers had a dedicated liver-intensive or transplant-intensive care unit ( p < 0.001). The median time to LT was within 48 hours in 12.7% of respondents' centers, 72 hours in 35.6%, 1 week in 37.6%, and more than 1 week in 9.6% ( p < 0.001). Deceased donor liver graft (49.6%) was the most common type of graft offered. For consideration of LT, 84.8% of physicians used King's College Criteria, and 41.6% used Clichy Criteria. Significant differences were observed between Asia, Europe, and North America for offering LT, number of LTs performed, volume of patients with ALF, admission to a dedicated intensive care unit, median time to LT, type of liver graft, monitoring HE and intracranial pressure, management of coagulopathy, and utilization of different criteria for LT. In our study, we observed significant geographic differences in the practice and management of ALF. As ALF is rare, multicenter studies are valuable for identifying global practice., (Copyright © 2024 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background: The concept of organ transplantation as treatment for complex genetic conditions, including Wolcott-Rallison syndrome (WRS), continues to show promise. Liver transplantation is essential for survival of patients with WRS, and pancreas transplantation cures their type I diabetes mellitus., Methods: The recipient, a 3-year-old girl weighing 14 kg at the time of transplantation, suffered from major complications of WRS, including repetitive liver failure episodes and poorly controlled diabetes. The patient underwent a nonacute, combined, simultaneous liver and pancreas transplantation from a pediatric donor without using the en bloc technique., Results: Well-preserved graft functions at 2-year follow-up with normal liver and pancreas function., Conclusions: This is the first case report of simultaneous liver and pancreas transplantation as treatment of WRS in a small child in Europe. Two-year follow-up demonstrates that organ transplantation can halt life-threating recurrent liver failure episodes and cure type 1 diabetes.

Hepatitis E virus of genotype 3 (HEV-3) is an emerging cause of sporadic autochthonous acute hepatitis in Europe. Although spontaneous outcome of hepatitis E is usually favorable, fulminant liver failure has been described worldwide. In Europe, autochthonous hepatitis E associated with fulminant hepatic failure and leading to liver transplantation has been exceptionally reported. We report here four cases of fulminant and sub-fulminant hepatitis E proposed for liver transplantation in Marseille University hospitals between July 2006 and March 2010. HEV diagnosis relied on detection of anti-HEV IgM antibodies and HEV RNA in serum samples. All cases were men, with no travel history in hyperendemic areas. HEV sequence analyses revealed genotype 3 HEV in the four patients. Liver histology indicated severe acute hepatitis in all of them, pre-existing fibrosis being found in two cases. Two patients underwent liver transplantation, and the two other patients could not be transplanted due to septic complications and died. HEV testing should be performed for the initial evaluation of every acute liver failure regardless of the epidemiological and clinical context. With respect to the potentially fulminant evolution of HEV genotype 3 infections, treatment with ribavirin of severe acute hepatitis E should be considered., (Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Acute liver failure is a clinical syndrome characterized by hepatic encephalopathy and a bleeding tendency due to severe impairment of liver function caused by massive or submassive liver necrosis. Viral hepatitis is the most important and frequent cause of acute liver failure in Japan. The diagnostic criteria for fulminant hepatitis, including that caused by viral infections, autoimmune hepatitis, and drug allergy induced-liver damage, were first established in 1981. Considering the discrepancies between the definition of fulminant hepatitis in Japan and the definitions of acute liver failure in the United States and Europe, the Intractable Hepato-Biliary Disease Study Group established the diagnostic criteria for "acute liver failure" for Japan in 2011, and performed a nationwide survey of patients seen in 2010 to clarify the demographic and clinical features and outcomes of these patients. According to the survey, the survival rates of patients receiving medical treatment alone were low, especially in those with hepatic encephalopathy, despite artificial liver support, consisting of plasma exchange and hemodiafiltration, being provided to almost all patients in Japan. Thus, liver transplantation is inevitable to rescue most patients with hepatic encephalopathy. The indications for liver transplantation had, until recently, been determined according to the guideline published by the Acute Liver Failure Study Group in 1996. Recently, however, the Intractable Hepato-Biliary Disease Study Group established a scoring system to predict the outcomes of acute liver failure patients. Algorithms for outcome prediction have also been developed based on data-mining analyses. These novel guidelines need further evaluation to determine their usefulness.

Background & Aims: Liver transplantation for acute liver failure (ALF) still has a high early mortality. We evaluated changes during 20 years, and identified risk factors for poor outcome., Methods: Donor, graft, and recipient variables from the European Liver Transplant Registry database (January 1988-June 2009), were analysed. Aetiologies and time periods were compared. Three and 12-month survival models were generated from separate training data sets, which were validated. A sub-analysis was performed for recipient older than 50 years., Results: Four thousand nine hundred and three patients were evaluated. One, 5- and 10-year patient, and graft survival rates were 74%, 68%, 63%, and 63%, 57%, 50%, respectively. Survival was better in 2004-2009 compared to previous quinquennia (p<0.001), despite donors >60 years increased from 1.8% to 21%. A higher incidence of suicide or non-adherence occurred in paracetamol-related ALF (p<0.001). Death or graft loss were independently associated with male recipients (adjusted OR 1.25), recipient >50 years (1.26), incompatible ABO matching (1.93), donors >60 years (1.21), and reduced size graft (1.54). For both 3- and 12-month models, incompatible ABO matching, non-viral aetiology, reduced size graft, and non-UW preservation fluid were associated with increased mortality/graft loss, whereas male recipients and age >50 years were associated only at 12 months. Both models had reasonable discriminative ability with good calibration at 3 months. Recipients >50 years, combined with donors >60 years resulted in 57% mortality/graft loss within the first year., Conclusions: Survival after liver transplantation has improved despite increases in donor/recipient age. Recipients >50 years paired with donors >60 years had a very high mortality/graft loss within the first year., (Copyright © 2012 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Summary: Perioperative infections remain an important problem for patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT). For prevention of these infections, perioperative prophylaxis has become the standard procedure. Yet, either guidelines or data on current practice are lacking. The aim of the study was to gain insight into prophylactic antimicrobial strategies used in Europe. A survey questionnaire was sent out to all LT centers that are member of the European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association. In the survey questionnaire, we asked for details on the prophylactic antimicrobial regimen used in LT recipients. The response rate was 48%. Antibiotic prophylaxis for elective LT was provided by a first-line betalactam antibiotic or co-trimoxazole in 25%. Seventy-three per cent of those centers surveyed gave an extended spectrum, and one center used a 6-month rotation strategy. Antifungal prophylaxis was administered in 35% of centers in all LT recipients, in 53% of centers in patients at risk, and in 12% of centers not at all. Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis was never administered in 10%. In 12% of the centers surveyed, all the patients received cytomegalovirus prophylaxis, and another 78% of the centers gave it only to risk groups. In Europe, there is a considerable variation in the different antibiotic, antifungal and cytomegalovirus prophylactic strategies used for LT. These findings underscore the need for randomized controlled trials to determine the optimal prophylactic antimicrobial regimen.

Background/aims/methods: We report 1-year results after auxiliary liver transplantation for acute liver failure in a cohort of 47 patients transplanted in 12 European centers as compared with those of 384 consecutive patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation for acute liver failure in the Eurotransplant area., Results: One-year patient survival resp. retransplant-free patient survival did not differ between orthotopic (61%, 232/384 resp. 52%, 200/384) and auxiliary liver transplantation (62%, 29/47 resp. 53%, 25/47). One-year patient survival resp. retransplant-free patient survival after auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation was 71% (25/35) resp. 60% (21/35), not significantly different from orthotopic liver transplantation (61%, 232/384 resp. 52%, 200/384), while both transplantation techniques had better 1-year patient survival resp. retransplant-free patient survival than after heterotopic auxiliary liver transplantation (33%, 4/12) (p < 0.05). Primary nonfunction was more frequent after heterotopic auxiliary liver transplantation (3/12, 25%) than after orthotopic liver transplantation (21/384, 5.5%), while the incidence did not differ between orthotopic liver transplantation and auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (3/35, 8.5%). Portal vein thrombosis was more frequent after both heterotopic auxiliary liver transplantation (5/12, 42%) and auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (5/35, 14%) than after orthotopic liver transplantation (2/384, 0.5%) (p < 0.001). Of the patients, 65% (17/26) surviving auxiliary liver transplantation for 1 year without retransplantation by orthotopic liver transplantation were free of immunosuppression within 1 year, compared with none of the patients transplanted by orthotopic liver transplantation (p < 0.01)., Conclusions: Auxiliary liver transplantation, especially auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation, offers an advantage over orthotopic liver transplantation in acute liver failure in terms of a chance of a life free of immunosuppression, apparently without jeopardizing chances of survival. Reduction of the incidence of primary nonfunction and vascular complications should be a focus of research in auxiliary liver transplantation. These findings need to be confirmed in a prospective study.

Approximately 11% of all liver transplants performed in Europe are for acute liver failure, with one-year patient survival rates ranging between 50% and 75%. This review summarizes the selection, perioperative management, and outcome of patients transplanted for acute liver failure, with particular reference to the experience at the Hôpital Paul Brousse in Paris and at King's College Hospital, London. In both centers, the decision to proceed to liver transplantation is based on criteria that predict a survival of less than 20% with medical management alone. Infectious complications and cerebral edema remain the most common causes of death, and highlight the importance of intensive monitoring and early treatment of perioperative complications. In selected patients, auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation may be a therapeutic option, with the potential for native liver generation and eventual immunosuppression withdrawal in approximately two-thirds of patients.