Search

Background: First-time syncopal episodes usually occur in adults of working age, but their impact on occupational safety and employment remains unknown. We examined the associations of syncope with occupational accidents and termination of employment.Methods and Results: Through linkage of Danish population-based registers, we included all residents 18 to 64 years from 2008 to 2012. Among 3 410 148 eligible individuals, 21 729 with a first-time diagnosis of syncope were identified, with a median age 48.4 years (first to third quartiles, 33.0-59.5), and 10 757 (49.5%) employed at time of the syncope event. Over a median follow-up of 3.2 years (first to third quartiles, 2.0-4.5), 622 people with syncope had an occupational accident requiring hospitalization (2.1/100 person-years). In multiple Poisson regression analysis, the incidence rate ratio in the employed syncope population was higher than in the employed general population (1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-1.55) and more pronounced in people with recurrences (2.02; 95% CI, 1.47-2.78). The 2-year risk of termination of employment was 31.3% (95% CI, 30.4%-32.3%), which was twice the risk of the reference population (15.2%; 95% CI, 14.7%-15.7%), using the Aalen-Johansen estimator. Factors associated with termination of employment were age <40 years (incidence rate ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.37-1.59), cardiovascular disease (1.20; 95% CI, 1.06-1.36), depression (1.72; 95% CI, 1.55-1.90), and low educational level (2.61; 95% CI, 2.34-2.91).Conclusions: In this nationwide cohort, syncope was associated with a 1.4-fold higher risk of occupational accidents and a 2-fold higher risk of termination of employment compared with the employed general population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Return to work is important financially, as a marker of functional status and for self-esteem in patients developing chronic illness. We examined return to work after first heart failure (HF) hospitalization.Methods: By individual-level linkage of nationwide Danish registries, we identified 21 455 patients of working age (18-60 years) with a first HF hospitalization in the period from 1997 to 2012. Of these patients, 11 880 (55%) were in the workforce before HF hospitalization and comprised the study population. We applied logistic regression to estimate odds ratios for associations between age, sex, length of hospital stay, level of education, income, comorbidity, and return to work.Results: One year after first HF hospitalization, 8040 (67.7%) returned to the workforce, 2981 (25.1%) did not, 805 (6.7%) died, and 54 (0.5%) emigrated. Predictors of return to work included younger age (18-30 versus 51-60 years; odds ratio [OR], 3.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.42-4.03), male sex (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.12-1.34), and level of education (long-higher versus basic school; OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.63-2.60). Conversely, hospital stay >7 days (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.51-0.62) and comorbidity including history of stroke (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.45-0.69), chronic kidney disease (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.36-0.59), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.52-0.75), diabetes mellitus (OR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.85), and cancer (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.40-0.61) were all significantly associated with lower chance of return to work.Conclusions: Patients in the workforce before HF hospitalization had low mortality but high risk of detachment from the workforce 1 year later. Young age, male sex, and a higher level of education were predictors of return to work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Increasing numbers of patients with advanced heart failure and significant comorbidity and social barriers are considered for left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). We sought to examine health care utilization post-LVAD implantation, including the influence of individual-level socio-economic position and multimorbidity., Methods and Results: We conducted a Danish nationwide cohort study linking individual-level data from clinical LVAD databases, the Scandiatransplant Database, and Danish national medical and administrative registries. Socio-economic position included cohabitation status, educational level, and employment status. Multimorbidity was defined as two or more chronic conditions from at least two chronic disease groups. Health care utilization (hospital activity, general practice activity, and redeemed medical prescriptions) within 2 years post-discharge after LVAD implantation was evaluated using descriptive statistics at 0.5 year intervals. We identified 119 patients discharged alive with first-time LVAD implanted between 2006 and 2018. The median age of the patients was 56.1 years, and 88.2% were male. Patients were followed until heart transplantation, LVAD explantation, death, 31 December 2018, or for 2 years. The median follow-up was 0.8 years. The highest median use of health care services was observed 0-0.5 years post-LVAD discharge compared with the subsequent follow-up intervals: 0.5-1, 1-1.5, and 1.5-2 years, respectively. The median (interquartile range) number of hospitalizations was 10 (7-14), bed days 14 (9-28), outpatient visits 8 (5-12), telephone contacts with a general practitioner 4 (2-8), and total redeemed medical prescriptions 26 (19-37) within 0-0.5 years post-LVAD discharge compared with the median utilization within the consecutive follow-up periods [e.g. within 0.5-1 year: hospitalizations 5 (3-8), bed days 8 (4-14), outpatient visits 5 (3-8), telephone contacts 2 (0-5), and redeemed medical prescriptions 24 (18-30)]. The median use of health care services was stable from 0.5 years onwards. The median number of hospitalizations and bed days was slightly higher in patients living alone with a low educational level or low employment status within 0-0.5 years post-LVAD implantation. Finally, the median number of in-hospital days and redeemed prescriptions was higher among patients with pre-existing multimorbidity., Conclusions: Among patients who underwent LVAD implantation, health care utilization was high in the early post-LVAD discharge phase and was influenced by socio-economic position. Multimorbidity influenced the number of in-hospital days and redeemed prescriptions during the 2 year follow-up., (© 2024 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Chronic inflammation is increasingly recognized as a risk factor for VTE, but unlike other inflammatory diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis, data on the risk of VTE in patients with sarcoidosis are sparse., Research Question: Do patients with sarcoidosis have a higher long-term risk of VTE (pulmonary embolism or DVT, and each of these individually) compared with the background population?, Study Design and Methods: Using Danish nationwide registries, patients aged ≥ 18 years with newly diagnosed sarcoidosis (two or more inpatient/outpatient visits, 1996-2020) without prior VTE were matched 1:4 by age, sex, and comorbidities with individuals from the background population. The primary outcome was VTE., Results: We included 14,742 patients with sarcoidosis and 58,968 matched individuals (median age, 44.7 years; 57.2% male). The median follow-up was 8.8 years. Absolute 10-year risks of outcomes for patients with sarcoidosis vs the background population were the following: VTE, 2.9% vs 1.6% (P < .0001), pulmonary embolism, 1.5% vs 0.7% (P < .0001), and DVT, 1.6% vs 1.0% (P < .0001), respectively. In multivariable Cox regression, sarcoidosis was associated with an increased rate of all outcomes in the first year after diagnosis (VTE: hazard ratio [HR], 4.94; 95% CI, 3.61-6.75) and after the first year (VTE: HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.45-1.87) compared with the background population. These associations persisted when excluding patients with a history of cancer and censoring patients with incident cancer during follow-up. Three-month mortality was not significantly different between patients with VTE with and without sarcoidosis (adjusted HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.61-1.15)., Interpretation: In this nationwide cohort study, sarcoidosis was associated with a higher long-term risk of VTE compared with a matched background population., Competing Interests: Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures The authors have reported to CHEST the following: A. Y. reports a grant from the Foundation of Rigshospitalet. E. L. F. reports independent and unrelated research funding from the Danish Heart Association and the Novo Nordisk Foundation. F. G. reports being an advisor for Abbott, Fineheart, AdjuCor, Bayer, Ionis, Alnylam, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer; and a speaker for Novartis, all outside the submitted work. S. L. K. reports being on the advisory board for Bayer, outside the submitted work. M. S. reports lecture fees from Novo Nordisk, Bohringer, Astra Zeneca, and Novartis, outside the submitted work. K. R. reports being an advisory board member for Abbott, Novo Nordisk, and Boehringer-Ingelheim; and speaking fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Abbott, and MSD, all outside the submitted work. L. K. reports compensation from Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and AstraZeneca for other services, outside the submitted work. J. H. B. reports advisory board honoraria from AstraZeneca and Bayer, consultant honoraria from Novartis and AstraZeneca, and travel grants from AstraZeneca, all outside the submitted work. None declared (S. B. K., J. K. P., G. S., S. N. D.)., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The use of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in treating advanced heart failure has increased. However, data regarding medical treatment and adherence following LVAD implantation is sparse, particularly whether socioeconomic factors (cohabitation status, educational level, employment status, and income) and multimorbidity influence these aspects, which are known to impact adherence in heart failure patients. We performed a nationwide cohort study of 119 patients with LVAD implanted between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2018, who were discharged alive with LVAD therapy. We linked individual-level data from clinical LVAD databases, the Scandiatransplant Database, and Danish medical and administrative registers. Medical treatment 90-day pre-LVAD and 720-day post-LVAD were assessed using descriptive statistics in 90-day intervals. Medication adherence (proportion of days covered ≥80%) was assessed 181- to 720-day post-LVAD. The proportions of patients using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (88.7%), beta-blockers (67.0%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (62.9%), warfarin (87.6%), and aspirin (55.7%) within 90-day post-LVAD were higher than pre-LVAD and were stable during follow-up. Medication adherence ranged from 86.7% (aspirin) to 97.8% (warfarin). Socioeconomic factors and multimorbidity did not influence medical medication use and adherence. Among LVAD patients, medical treatment and adherence are at high levels, regardless of socioeconomic background and multimorbidity., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2023.)

Background: Valve-in-valve-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a feasible and increasingly used treatment option for failed surgical aortic prosthesis, but data from clinical practice are limited. We aimed to examine patient characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing TAVI in a surgival valve (valve-in-valve TAVI) compared with patients undergoing TAVI in a native valve., Methods: Using nationwide registries, we identified all Danish citizens, who underwent TAVI from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2020., Results: A total of 6,070 patients undergoing TAVI were identified; 247 (4%) patients had a history of SAVR (The valve-in-valve cohort). The median age of the study population was 81 (25th-75th percentile 77-85) and 55% were men. Patients with valve-in-valve-TAVI were younger but had a greater burden of cardiovascular comorbidities compared with patients with native-valve-TAVI. Within 30 days post procedure, 11 (0.2%) and 748 (13.8%) patients who underwent valve-in-valve-TAVI and native-valve-TAVI, respectively, had a pacemaker implantation. The cumulative 30-day risk of death among patients with valve-in-valve-TAVI was 2.4% (95% CI: 1.0%-5.0%) and 2.7% (95% CI: 2.3%-3.1%) in patients with native-valve-TAVI, respectively. Correspondingly, the cumulative 5-year risk of death was 42.5% (95% CI: 34.2%-50.6%) and 44.8% (95% CI: 43.2%-46.4%), respectively. In multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, valve-in-valve-TAVI was not associated with a significantly different risk of death at 30 days (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.95, 95% CI 0.41-2.19) and 5 years (HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.62-1.00) post-TAVI compared with native-valve-TAVI., Conclusions: TAVI in a failed surgical aortic prosthesis as compared to TAVI in a native valve, was not associated with significantly different short- and long-term mortality, suggesting that valve-in-valve-TAVI is a safe procedure., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None reported., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Physical and mental well-being after critical illness may be objectified by the ability to work. We examined return to work among patients with myocardial infarction (MI) by cardiogenic shock (CS) status., Methods: Danish nationwide registries were used to identify patients with first-time MI by CS status between 2005 and 2015, aged 18-63 years, working before hospitalization and discharged alive. Multiple logistic regression models were used to compare groups., Results: We identified 19 799 patients with MI of whom 653 had CS (3%). The median age was similar for patients with and without CS (53 years, interquartile range 47-58). One-year outcomes in patients with and without CS were as follows: 52% vs. 83% returned to work, 41% vs. 16% did not and 6% vs. 1% died. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) of returning to work was 0.53 [95% confidence limit (CI): 0.42-0.66]. In patients with CS, males and patients surviving OHCA were more likely to return to work (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.15-2.92 and 1.55, 95% CI: 1.00-2.40, respectively), whereas prolonged hospitalization (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22-0.65) and anoxic brain damage (OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.18-0.72) were associated with lower likelihood of returning to work., Conclusion: In patients with MI discharged alive, approximately 80% of those without CS returned to work at 1-year follow-up in contrast to 50% of those with CS. Among patients with CS, male sex and OHCA survivors were markers positively related to return to work, whereas prolonged hospitalization and anoxic brain damage were negatively related markers., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Patients with chronic diseases are at higher risk of requiring domiciliary and nursing home care, but how different chronic diseases compare in terms of risk is not known. We examined initiation of domiciliary care and nursing home admission among patients with heart failure (HF), stroke, COPD and cancer., Methods: Patients with a first-time hospitalization for HF, stroke, COPD or cancer from 2008-2016 were identified. Patients were matched on age and sex and followed for five years., Results: 111,144 patients, 27,786 with each disease, were identified. The median age was 69 years and two thirds of the patients were men. The 5-year risk of receiving domiciliary care was; HF 20.9%, stroke 25.2%, COPD 24.6% and cancer 19.3%. The corresponding adjusted hazard ratios (HRs), with HF patients used as reference, were: stroke 1.35[1.30-1.40]; COPD 1.29[1.25-1.34]; and cancer 1.19[1.14-1.23]. The five-year incidence of nursing home admission was 6.6% for stroke, and substantially lower in patients with HF(2.6%), COPD(2.6%) and cancer (1.5%). The adjusted HRs were (HF reference): stroke, 2.44 [2.23-2.68]; COPD 1.01 [0.91-1.13] and cancer 0.76 [0.67-0.86]. Living alone, older age, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, depression and dementia predicted a higher likelihood of both types of care., Conclusions: In patients with HF, stroke, COPD or cancer 5-year risk of domiciliary care and nursing home admission, ranged from 19-25% and 1-7%, respectively. Patients with stroke had the highest rate of domiciliary care and were more than twice as likely to be admitted to a nursing home, compared to patients with the other conditions., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: Data on long-term cardiovascular outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are sparse., Objectives: This study sought to examine the long-term risk and prognosis associated with cardiovascular outcomes, including heart failure (HF), in patients with SLE., Methods: Using Danish administrative registries, risks of outcomes were compared between SLE patients (diagnosed 1996 to 2018, no history of cardiovascular disease) and age-, sex-, and comorbidity-matched control subjects from the background population (matched 1:4). Furthermore, mortality following HF diagnosis was compared between SLE patients developing HF and age- and sex-matched non-SLE control subjects with HF (matched 1:4)., Results: A total of 3,411 SLE patients (median age: 44.6 years [25th to 75th percentile: 31.9 to 57.0 years]; 14.1% men) were matched with 13,644 control subjects. The median follow-up was 8.5 years (25th to 75th percentile: 4.0 to 14.4 years). Absolute 10-year risks of outcomes were: HF, 3.71% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.02% to 4.51%) for SLE patients, 1.94% (95% CI: 1.68% to 2.24%) for control subjects; atrial fibrillation, 4.35% (95% CI: 3.61% to 5.18%) for SLE patients, 2.82% (95% CI: 2.50% to 3.16%) for control subjects; ischemic stroke, 3.75% (95% CI: 3.06% to 4.54%) for SLE patients, 1.92% (95% CI: 1.66% to 2.20%) for control subjects; myocardial infarction, 2.17% (95% CI: 1.66% to 2.80%) for SLE patients, 1.49% (95% CI: 1.26% to 1.75%) for control subjects; venous thromboembolism, 6.03% (95% CI: 5.17% to 6.98%) for SLE patients, 1.68% (95% CI: 1.44% to 1.95%) for control subjects; and the composite of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation/ventricular arrhythmias/cardiac arrest, 0.89% (95% CI: 0.58% to 1.31%) for SLE patients, 0.30% (95% CI: 0.20% to 0.43%) for control subjects. SLE with subsequent HF was associated with higher mortality compared with HF without SLE (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.08 to 2.08)., Conclusions: SLE patients had a higher associated risk of HF and other cardiovascular outcomes compared with matched control subjects. Among patients developing HF, a history of SLE was associated with higher mortality., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures All authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Viral or idiopathic pericarditis is a frequent condition, often considered benign, although prior studies have suggested that pericarditis is associated with both cardiovascular and noncardiovascular disease, for example, malignancy., Objectives: This study sought to assess mortality risk and morbidity patterns in patients with incident viral or idiopathic pericarditis., Methods: In nationwide Danish registries, we identified patients discharged with a first-time diagnosis of pericarditis from 1996 to 2016. Patients with a severe underlying heart condition were excluded. The patients were matched 1:10 with individuals from the general population by sex and year of birth. We assessed 5-year mortality using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for baseline comorbidities and identified subsequent hospital admissions., Results: We identified 7,988 patients with pericarditis and 79,880 matched control individuals. The absolute 5-year survival probability was 92.9% and 95.8% in the pericarditis and control groups, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.31; 95% confidence interval: 1.13 to 1.52). The greatest difference in mortality was seen the first year, and it was primarily driven by the female part of the population. The incidence rate per 1,000 person-years of new-onset, admission-required diagnosis was higher in the pericarditis group both for cardiovascular and noncardiovascular diseases., Conclusions: We observed a higher mortality risk over 5 years in the pericarditis group, especially among the female patients, compared to matched control individuals. Furthermore, we observed a higher frequency of both cardiovascular and noncardiovascular hospital admissions, highlighting the need for focus on underlying morbidity in patients presenting with apparent viral or idiopathic pericarditis., Competing Interests: Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: It is estimated that 5% of patients with sarcoidosis have clinically manifest cardiac involvement, although autopsy and imaging studies suggest a significantly higher prevalence of cardiac involvement. There is a paucity of contemporary data on the risk of adverse cardiac outcomes, particularly heart failure (HF), in patients with sarcoidosis., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the long-term risk of HF and other adverse cardiac outcomes in patients with sarcoidosis compared with matched control subjects., Methods: In this cohort study, all patients age ≥18 years with newly diagnosed sarcoidosis (1996 to 2016) were identified through Danish nationwide registries and matched 1:4 by age, sex, and comorbidities with control subjects from the background population without sarcoidosis., Results: Of the 12,042 patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis, 11,834 patients were matched with 47,336 subjects from the background population (median age: 42.8 years [25th to 75th percentile: 33.1 to 55.8 years], 54.3% men). The median follow-up was 8.2 years. Absolute 10-year risks of outcomes were as follows: HF: 3.18% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.83% to 3.57%) for sarcoidosis patients and 1.72% (95% CI: 1.58% to 1.86%) for the background population; the composite of ICD implantation, ventricular arrhythmias, and cardiac arrest: 0.96% (95% CI: 0.77% to 1.18%) for sarcoidosis patients and 0.45% (95% CI: 0.38% to 0.53%) for the background population; the composite of pacemaker implantation, atrioventricular block, and sinoatrial dysfunction: 0.94% (95% CI: 0.75% to 1.16%) for sarcoidosis patients and 0.51% (95% CI: 0.44% to 0.59%) for the background population; atrial fibrillation or flutter: 3.44% (95% CI: 3.06% to 3.84%) for sarcoidosis patients and 2.66% (95% CI: 2.49% to 2.84%) for the background population; and all-cause mortality: 10.88% (95% CI: 10.23% to 11.55%) for sarcoidosis patients and 7.43% (95% CI: 7.15% to 7.72%) for the background population., Conclusions: Patients with sarcoidosis had a higher associated risk of HF and other adverse cardiac outcomes compared with matched control subjects., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death, but not all-cause death in patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure (HF). Whether co-existence of diabetes affects ICD treatment effects is unclear., Methods and Results: We examined the effect of ICD implantation on risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and sudden cardiac death (SCD) according to diabetes status at baseline in the Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients with Non-ischaemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality (DANISH) trial. Outcomes were analysed by use of cumulative incidence curves and Cox regressions models. Of the 1116 patients enrolled, 211 (19%) had diabetes at baseline. Patients with diabetes were more obese, had worse kidney function and more were in New York Heart Association Class III/IV. The risk of device infections and other complications in the ICD group was similar among patients with and without diabetes (6.1% vs. 4.6% P = 0.54). Irrespective of treatment group, diabetes was associated with higher risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and SCD. The treatment effect of ICD in patients with diabetes vs. patients without diabetes was hazard ratio (HR) = 0.92 (0.57-1.50) vs. HR = 0.85 (0.63-1.13); Pinteraction = 0.60 for all-cause mortality, HR = 0.99 (0.58-1.70) vs. HR = 0.70 (0.48-1.01); Pinteraction = 0.25 for cardiovascular death, and HR = 0.81 (0.35-1.88) vs. HR = 0.40 (0.22-0.76); Pinteraction = 0.16 for sudden cardiac death., Conclusion: Among patients with non-ischaemic systolic HF, diabetes was associated with higher incidence of all-cause mortality, primarily driven by cardiovascular mortality including SCD. Treatment effect of ICD therapy was not significantly modified by diabetes which might be due to lack of power., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and causes of hospitalization in the year preceding death of patients with heart failure (HF)., Background: Hospitalizations in HF are common, especially in the last period of the lives of patients with HF, but little is known about hospitalization burden and causes during this phase of the disease., Methods: From Danish nationwide registries, we identified patients who died in the period 2001-2016 after having experienced HF for at least 1 year, and examined hospitalizations during the last year of life in age- and sex-stratified analyses., Results: We included 32,157 patients. Median age at time of death was 81 years; 39% were women. A total of 26,561 (84%) patients were hospitalized at least once during the last year of life. The patients experienced a median of 2 (1 to 3) hospitalizations and spent 14 (3 to 31) days in the hospital. Of all hospitalizations (n = 80,362), 9,644 (12%) were due to HF, 14,738 (18%) due to other cardiovascular (CV) causes, and 51,696 (64%) due to non-CV causes (p < 0.001). The frequency of hospitalizations increased toward death, but the domination of non-CV causes remained consistent throughout the year, regardless of age and sex. If we included diagnoses covering renal insufficiency in the definition of HF hospitalizations, non-CV hospitalizations remained dominant (58%)., Conclusions: During the last year alive, patients with HF were more often hospitalized due to non-CV causes rather than HF. These findings warrant more focus on a multidisciplinary approach toward end-of-life care in patients with HF., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Infective endocarditis (IE) may cause debilitating physical and mental changes that can interfere with activities of daily living. Admission to a nursing home and need for domiciliary care following hospitalization for IE represent such relevant outcomes, yet no such data have been reported., Methods: Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified all patients discharged alive after a first-time IE hospitalization in the period 1996 to 2014. These were matched by age, sex, calendar year, and relevant comorbidities with the background population in a 1:1 ratio. The 1-year rate of nursing home admission and initiation of domiciliary care, respectively, were assessed by multivariable Cox regression analyses., Results: In total, 4,493 IE patients were matched with 4,493 control subjects from the background population (median age: 66.8 years; interquartile range: 54.1, 76.7; 67.8% men). The 1-year incidence of nursing home admission was significantly higher among IE patients compared with the matched population (3.4% vs. 1.0%; hazard ratio: 7.95; 95% confidence interval: 4.00-15.77). Furthermore, IE patients had an increased use of domiciliary care compared with the matched population (6.6% vs. 2.1%; hazard ratio: 4.39; 95% confidence interval: 2.74-7.05). Factors associated with an increased risk of nursing home admission and domiciliary care among IE patients included older age, living alone, longer length of hospital stay, cardiovascular comorbidities, and stroke during admission., Conclusions: Patients who survived IE had an 8× higher incidence of nursing home admission and a 4× higher incidence of initiation of domiciliary care than their counterparts from the matched population., (Copyright © 2019 World Heart Federation (Geneva). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to assess safety and effectiveness of low-dose aspirin in heart failure (HF) not complicated by atrial fibrillation., Background: Despite lack of evidence, low-dose aspirin is widely used in patients with HF and sinus rhythm with and without prior ischemic heart disease., Methods: The study included 12,277 patients with new-onset HF during 2007 to 2012 who had no history of atrial fibrillation. Of 5,450 patients using low-dose aspirin at baseline, 3,840 were propensity matched to non-aspirin users in a 1:1 ratio. Propensity-matched Cox models were calculated with respect to the primary composite outcome of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke and the secondary outcomes of bleeding and HF readmission., Results: The composite outcome occurred in 1,554 (40.5%) patients in the aspirin group and 1,604 (41.8%) patients in the non-aspirin group. Aspirin use was not associated with an altered risk of composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91 to 1.05), but it was associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction (HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.67), whereas no differences were observed in all-cause mortality and stroke. An increased risk of HF readmission was observed in the aspirin group (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.33). No difference in bleeding was observed. In subgroup analyses on the basis of a history of ischemic heart disease, the results were similar to the main result., Conclusions: No association was detected between low-dose aspirin use and the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, admission for myocardial infarction, and admission for stroke in patients with HF with no history of atrial fibrillation. Aspirin use was associated with an increased risk of readmission for HF., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study investigated the association between the use of evidence-based medicine (EBM) for heart failure (HF) and risk of workforce detachment., Background: The ability to work can be a marker of functional capacity and quality of life., Methods: We examined a nationwide cohort of patients in the workforce 1 year after first hospitalization for HF. EBM was defined as treatment with β-blockers and renin angiotensin system inhibitors. The fraction of target dose (0 TO 1) for each drug was calculated. The sum of the fractions gave each patient a score between 0 and 2. Patients were stratified into 4 groups according to this score: group 4 score = 2 (target dose of both drugs); group 3 score <2 to >1; group 2 score ≤1 to >0.5; and group 1 score ≤0.5. The risk of subsequent workforce detachment was estimated in cause specific Cox regression models., Results: One year after first HF hospitalization, 10,185 patients were part of the workforce, and 7,561 (74%) were in treatment with at least 1 of the components of EBM. During a median follow-up of 727 days, 2,698 individuals (36%) became detached from the workforce. Patients receiving more EBM had a significantly lower risk of workforce detachment compared with those receiving less EBM (group 4 hazard ratio [HR]: 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77 to 0.98; group 3 HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.77 to 0.94; and group 2 HR 0.92; 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.02), all compared to group 1., Conclusions: Patients in the workforce 1 year after first HF hospitalization and treated with target or near-target doses of EBM were associated with a significantly lower risk of subsequent workforce detachment., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) and antithrombotic treatment on the prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF) as well as vascular disease., Background: HF, vascular disease, and AF are pathophysiologically related, and understanding antithrombotic treatment for these conditions is crucial., Methods: In hospitalized patients with HF and coexisting vascular disease (coronary artery disease or peripheral arterial disease) followed from 1997 to 2009, AF status was categorized as prevalent AF, incident AF, or no AF. Risk of thromboembolism (TE), myocardial infarction (MI), and serious bleeding was assessed by Cox regression models (hazard ratio [HR] with 95% confidence interval [CI]) with antithrombotic therapy and AF as time-dependent variables., Results: A total of 37,464 patients were included (age, 74.5 ± 10.7 years; 36.3% females) with a mean follow-up of 3 years during which 20.7% were categorized as prevalent AF and 17.2% as incident AF. Compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in prevalent AF, VKA plus antiplatelet was not associated with a decreased risk of TE (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.12) or MI (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.96 to 1.28), whereas bleeding risk was significantly increased (HR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.57). Corresponding estimates for incident AF were HRs of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.56 to 1.06), 1.07 (95% CI: 0.89 to 1.28), and 2.71 (95% CI: 1.33 to 2.21) for TE, MI, and bleeding, respectively. In no AF patients, no statistical differences were seen between antithrombotic therapies in TE or MI risk, whereas bleeding risk was significantly increased for VKA with and without single-antiplatelet therapy., Conclusions: In AF patients with coexisting HF and vascular disease, adding single-antiplatelet therapy to VKA therapy is not associated with additional benefit in thromboembolic or coronary risk, but notably increased bleeding risk., (Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)