1. Endoscopic submucosal resection (ESD) and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) via balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) in small bowel subepithelial lesions: experience in treating fifteen cases.
- Author
-
Li, Bai-Rong, Huang, Zi-Han, Li, Teng, Feng, Xiao-Meng, Chen, Xiao, Sun, Tao, Chen, Hong-Yu, Yin, Xin, and Ning, Shou-Bin
- Subjects
- *
INTESTINAL mucosa , *RESEARCH funding , *TREATMENT effectiveness , *RETROSPECTIVE studies , *CANCER patients , *TREATMENT duration , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *MINIMALLY invasive procedures , *ENTEROSCOPY , *SURGICAL complications , *INTESTINAL tumors , *ENDOSCOPIC gastrointestinal surgery , *MEDICAL records , *ACQUISITION of data , *MEDICAL balloons , *CASE studies , *SMALL intestine , *MILITARY hospitals , *EVALUATION ,DIGESTIVE organ surgery ,EPITHELIAL cell tumors - Abstract
Aim: The study objective was to evaluate the primary feasibility of endoscopic submucosal resection (ESD) and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) via balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) to treat small bowel subepithelial lesions (SELs). Method: A retrospective case series study was performed. The first fifteen consecutive patients who underwent ESD (n = 10) and EFTR (n = 5) via BAE to remove small bowel SELs from November 2016 to December 2023 were included. The main outcome measures were the technique success rate, operative time and complication rate. Results: This research focused on 15 cases of jejunoileal SELs, four cases of lipomyoma, three cases of ectopic pancreas, two cases of NETs, three cases of benign fibrous tumours and three cases of angioma. The overall technique success rate was 86.7%, with 100% (10/10) and 60% (3/5) for BAE-ESD and BAE-EFTR, respectively, in removing small bowel SELs. Two cases of EFTR failed, as the BAE operation was unsuitable for tumour resection and suture repair of a perforated wound. No serious bleeding or any postoperative complications occurred. The median time of endoscopic resection via BAE for SELs was 44 min (range 22–68 min). Conclusion: ESD and EFTR via BAE might be alternative choices for treating small SELs in the small bowel, with the advantages of clear and accurate positioning and minimal invasiveness. However, its superiority over surgery still needs to be further investigated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF