1. Nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 versus nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a multicenter, randomized, phase II study.
- Author
-
Jin, Min, Liu, Hong-Li, Xue, Jun, Ma, Hong, Liu, Jun-Li, Lin, Zhen-Yu, Wang, Jing, Bao, Le-Qun, Luo, Zhi-Guo, Yu, Xiong-Jie, Li, Shuang, Hu, Jian-Li, and Zhang, Tao
- Subjects
LEUCOPENIA ,PATIENT safety ,RESEARCH funding ,ANTINEOPLASTIC agents ,STATISTICAL sampling ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,PANCREATIC tumors ,GAMMA-glutamyltransferase ,GEMCITABINE ,DRUG efficacy ,RESEARCH ,PACLITAXEL ,PROGRESSION-free survival ,PROPORTIONAL hazards models ,NEUTROPENIA ,OVERALL survival - Abstract
Background Encouraging antitumor activity of nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (AS) has been shown in several small-scale studies. This study compared the efficacy and safety of AS versus standard-of-care nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG) as a first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). Methods In this multicenter, randomized, phase II trial, eligible patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic PC were recruited and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive AS (nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m
2 on days 1 and 8; S-1 twice daily on days 1 through 14) or AG (nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results Between July 16, 2019, and September 9, 2022, 62 patients (AS, n = 32; AG, n = 30) were treated and evaluated. With a median follow-up of 8.36 months at preplanned interim analysis (data cutoff, March 24, 2023), the median PFS (8.48 vs 4.47 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.402; P = .002) and overall survival (OS; 13.73 vs 9.59 months; HR, 0.226; P < .001) in the AS group were significantly longer compared to the AG group. More patients had objective response in the AS group than AG group (37.50% vs 6.67%; P = .005). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia and leucopenia in both groups, and gamma glutamyl transferase increase was observed only in the AG group. Conclusion The first-line AS regimen significantly extended both PFS and OS of Chinese patients with advanced PC when compared with the AG regimen, with a comparable safety profile. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03636308). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF