Mj Griffin, Massimo Bovenzi, A Della Vedova, Ajl Welsh, Bovenzi, Massimo, Welsh, Ajl, DELLA VEDOVA, A, and Griffin, Mj
Many millions of workers are exposed to hand‐transmitted vibration from powered tools and are at risk of developing disorders in the fingers, hands, or arms.1,2,3,4 One consequence of prolonged regular exposure to hand‐transmitted vibration is impaired circulation in the fingers, often evident during or following exposure to cold. The symptoms may be first noticed as abnormally cold fingers, but disorder is often diagnosed from reports of attacks of blanching on the distal, middle, or proximal phalanges. The condition is named “vibration‐induced white finger” from the characteristic attacks of blanching that are assumed to be caused by vibration damage, although the attacks are most often provoked by cold.4 The mechanisms involved in this heightened sensitivity to cold are not known, and so there is uncertainty as to the range of symptoms and signs that characterise the disorder. Although it is clear that hand‐transmitted vibration causes vibration‐induced white finger, there is limited evidence as to the characteristics of vibration that are responsible for the injury. To obtain a number indicating the severity of an exposure to vibration (that is, evaluate the vibration), it is necessary to make assumptions as to the importance of the vibration magnitude, the vibration frequency, the vibration direction, the daily exposure duration, and life‐time exposure duration. Various standards have made such assumptions so as to define uniform methods for evaluating the vibration on powered tools. Having defined a measure of vibration severity, it is possible to assess the acceptability of the vibration, in terms of the probability or severity of disorder. In International Standard 5349‐1 (2001), the evaluation is performed using the root‐mean‐square value of the vibration acceleration after it has been frequency‐weighted (using a weighting called Wh), assuming all directions of vibration to be equally important and all locations of contact with the hand to be equally likely to lead to problems.5 The assessment of vibration severity uses the 8‐hour energy equivalent daily exposure (called A(8)) to predict the years of exposure before 10% of persons are likely to develop the first signs of finger blanching. The frequency weighting inherent in current standards and directives did not evolve from epidemiological studies of the conditions causing vibration‐induced white finger, or from experimental studies of the effects of different frequencies of vibration on relevant physiological responses.6,7 The frequency weighting was largely based on a study of how the discomfort produced by hand‐transmitted vibration depends on the frequency of vibration.8 Some recent epidemiological studies suggest that the frequency weighting may not be optimum and that, at least for the vibration on some groups of common tools, the onset of finger blanching may be predicted with greater accuracy without using frequency weighting Wh.9 The frequency weighting has a large effect on the relative importance of vibration on different tools and, consequently, on the risks of injury and the responsibilities of employers. Improved understanding of the importance of vibration frequency therefore has considerable importance. Contact with the vibration on a tool involves the application of force to the fingers. There are tasks that involve the application of a force without exposure to vibration which do not result in the characteristic symptoms of vibration‐induced white finger, so force alone cannot explain the disorder. However, force may be expected to have some direct mechanical effect on circulation within the fingers. Furthermore, force may alter the transmission of vibration into the fingers and hand: increased force will tend to stiffen the tissues, which will change resonance frequencies and tend to increase the transmission of vibration from the area of contact with vibration. Occupational exposures to hand‐transmitted vibration result in symptoms of vibration‐induced white finger after many months, usually years, of regular exposure to vibration. Laboratory studies have found reductions in blood flow during and following exposure of a finger to vibration. The effects are not restricted to the vibrated finger but are also observed in other fingers, including those on a hand not exposed to vibration. Previous experimental studies by the current authors have explored the effects of the magnitude, frequency, and duration of vibration on finger blood flow using controlled contact areas and controlled contact force.10,11,12 The effects of variations in contact force on finger blood flow have not previously been investigated. This study was designed to investigate whether the force applied by a finger affected finger blood flow and whether the effects of force interacted with the acute effects of vibration. Specifically, it was hypothesised that finger blood flow would be affected by the application of force and that the effects of vibration frequency would be dependent on the force applied to the finger.