Search

Your search keyword '"SCREENING SCALE"' showing total 6 results
Start Over Descriptor "SCREENING SCALE" Topic validity
6 results on '"SCREENING SCALE"'

1. The External Validation of the Nursing Homes Short Depression Inventory in Older Adults with Major Neurocognitive Disorders in Long-Term Care Centers.

Author

Toulouse, Élodie, Carrier, Daphnée, Villemure, Maire-Pier, Roy Desruisseaux, Jessika, and Rochefort, Christian M.

Subjects
*COGNITION disorders diagnosis, *DIAGNOSIS of mental depression, *STATISTICS, *CONFIDENCE intervals, *PREDICTIVE tests, *PSYCHOSES, *RESEARCH methodology evaluation, *RESEARCH methodology, *NEUROBEHAVIORAL disorders, *NURSING care facilities, *PSYCHOLOGICAL tests, *MULTITRAIT multimethod techniques, *INTER-observer reliability, *INTRACLASS correlation, *DESCRIPTIVE statistics, *RESEARCH funding, *STATISTICAL sampling, *SENSITIVITY & specificity (Statistics), *RECEIVER operating characteristic curves, *CONTENT analysis, *DATA analysis, *DATA analysis software, *LONG-term health care, *OLD age, RESEARCH evaluation
Abstract

Introduction: Depression is often difficult to detect in long-term care (LTC) patients with major neurocognitive disorders (MNCD), and an observer-rated screening scale could facilitate assessments. This study aimed to establish the external validity and reliability of the Nursing Homes Short Depression Inventory (NH-SDI) in LTC patients with MNCD and to compare its estimates to the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD), the most used scale for depression in MNCD. Methods: A focus discussion group of experts assessed the content validity of the NH-SDI. Then, a convenience sample of 93 LTC patients with MNCD was observer-rated by trained nurses with the NH-SDI and CSDD. For 57 patients, a medical assessment of depression was obtained, and screening accuracy estimates were generated. Results: The prevalence of depression was 8.8% as per reference standard. NH-SDI's content validity was judged acceptable with minor item wording modifications and specifications. The NH-SDI (cut-off ≥3) achieved 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 46–100%) sensitivity, 83% (95% CI: 69–91%) specificity, and 36% (95% CI: 14–64%) positive predictive value (PPV). The CSDD (cut-off ≥3) achieved 100% (95% CI: 46–100%) sensitivity, 75% (95% CI: 61–86%) specificity, and 28% (95% CI: 11–54%) PPV. No significant differences in areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were found between scales. The NH-SDI and CSDD were highly correlated (rs = 0.913; p < 0.001) and reliable (ICC = 0.77; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The NH-SDI appears valid and reliable in LTC patients with MNCD and quicker than the CSDD to rule out depression in a busy or short-staffed setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. The Aesthetic Responsiveness Assessment (AReA): A Screening Tool to Assess Individual Differences in Responsiveness to Art in English and German.

Author

Schlotz, Wolff, Omigie, Diana, Hoelzmann, Sonja C., Wallot, Sebastian, Masucci, Michael D., and Vessel, Edward A.

Abstract

People differ in how they respond to artworks. Measuring such individual differences is helpful for explaining response variability and selecting particularly responsive subsamples. On the basis of a sample of items indicating relevant behavior and experience, we exploratively constructed the Aesthetic Responsiveness Assessment (AReA), a screening tool for the assessment of individual differences in responsiveness to art in English and German. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses suggested three first-order factors labeled aesthetic appreciation, intense aesthetic experience, and creative behavior, and a second-order factor aesthetic responsiveness. Aesthetic responsiveness was assessed in N = 781 participants from the United States and Germany, and measurement invariance analysis demonstrated full metric and partial scalar invariance across language versions. AReA scale scores yielded good reliability estimates. Validation studies confirmed expected associations between AReA scale scores and measures of related constructs, as well as continuously and retrospectively recorded responses to music, visual art, and poetry. In summary, the AReA is a promising, psychometrically evaluated instrument to assess aesthetic responsiveness built on a mixture of exploratory and confirmatory construction strategies. It can be used as a screening tool both in English and German speaking samples. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Validity and Reliability of the QIDS-SR16-Turkish in Comparison with BDI-II- Turkish Among Young Outpatient Sample of Turkish University Students.

Author

MERGEN, Haluk, TAVLI, Talat, and ÖNGEL, Kurtuluş

Subjects
*PRIMARY health care, *DIAGNOSIS of mental depression, *OUTPATIENT medical care, *COLLEGE students, *STATISTICAL correlation, *MENTAL depression, *FACTOR analysis, *RESEARCH methodology, *PATIENTS, *PSYCHOLOGICAL tests, *SCALES (Weighing instruments), *SELF-evaluation, *T-test (Statistics), *STRUCTURAL equation modeling, *SEVERITY of illness index, *RECEIVER operating characteristic curves, *RESEARCH methodology evaluation, *DATA analysis software, *DESCRIPTIVE statistics, *CLASSIFICATION, RESEARCH evaluation
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the validity and reliability of 16-item self-report version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) scale in comparison with BDI-ll-Turkish (BDI-II-T) in a young sample of Turkish university students. Methods: A slightly modified version of the QIDS-SR16-Turkish (QIDS-SR16-T) available at www.ids-qids.org, along with the BDI-II-T, was administered to 628 young Turkish university students who attended the Family Health Center in Uludag University Campus between February and April 2010. Descriptive analyses, Student's t-test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and confirmatory factor analyses were used in the study. Results: The mean age of the participants was 21.1±2.16 (SD) years; 67.8% were female and 32.2% were male. Cronbach's α coefficient for internal consistency of the QIDS-SR16-T was found to be 0.769. The mean item-total correlation was 0.45, ranging from 0.29 to 0.71. The correlation between the BDI-II-T and QIDS-SR16-T was 0.72. ROC curve analysis suggested 9 as the optimal cut-off for a clinical depression level for the QIDS-SR16-T. Conclusion: We observed that the QIDS-SR16-T demonstrated good psychometric properties in a sample of young Turkish students and has convergent validity with the BDI-II-T, a widely used scale for depression. It is essential to diagnose reliably the major depressive disorder and to follow up the patients by valid screening instruments in primary care setting. The internal consistencies of the QIDS determined in studies from the United States were greater than our Cronbach's α coefficient, but there was no statistically significant difference between them (z=0.55, p>0.05). The QIDS-SR16-T can be reliably used in primary care settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2012
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Comparative Validity and Reliability Study of The QIDS-SR16 in Turkish and American College Student Samples.

Author

Mergen, Haluk, Bernstein, Ira H., Tavli, Vedide, Ongel, Kurtulus, Tavli, Talat, and Tan, Seref

Subjects
*MENTAL depression, *SYMPTOMS, *STATISTICAL reliability, *FACTOR analysis, *PSYCHOMETRICS, *SELF-evaluation, *TURKS, *AMERICANS
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, selfreported version, in a Turkish student sample (QIDS-SR16-T) by comparing it to (a) the American version (QIDS-SR16- US) and (b) the Turkish version of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II-T). Materials and Methods: Slightly modified versions of the QIDS-SR16-T, and the BDI-II-T were administered to 626 outpatients at the Uludağ University campus-based family health center. The QIDS-SR16-US was administered to 584 respondents at an American university. SAS and MPlus were used to provide descriptive statistics, classical exploratory factor analysis, and item response theory analyses (in the form of a multiple group confirmatory factor analysis). Results: The internal consistency (Cronbach α) of the QIDS-SR16-T was 0.77. Both QIDS-SR16 versions were unidimensional, but the BDI-II-T was not. The mean QIDSSR16- T and QIDS-SR16-US item-total correlations were similar. The correlation between the QIDS-SR16-T and BDIII- T was 0.72 (.90 when disattenuated). Multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis suggested that the QIDSSR16- T and QIDS-SR16-US had the same factor loadings but different intercepts. This reflects group differences in level of depression, perhaps because the Turkish respondents, unlike their US counterparts, were seen in a medical context where illness-related depression is more prevalent. Scores on the QIDS-SR16-T and the BDI-II-T were also equated. Discussion: The QIDS-SR16-T has good psychometric properties and convergent validity with the BDI-II-T. Its use is recommended when a self-reported instrument is appropriate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2011
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Hızlı depresif belirti envanteri-özbildirim formu’nun ((HDBE16-ÖF) beck depresyon envanteri-II ile karşılaştırılarak ayaktan başvuran hastalarda geçerlilik ve güvenilirliği

Author

Tavlı, Talat, Öngel, Kurtuluş, Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Aile Sağlığı Merkezi., Mergen, Haluk, and A-1204-2018

Subjects
Adult, Male, University student, Family history, Student attitude, Major depressive episode, Screening test, Neurosciences & neurology, Trial, Article, Turkey (republic), Validity, Outpatient care, Majör depresif epizod, Disorder, Major depression, Psychometric evaluation, Beck depression inventory, Disease severity, Quick inventory, Intermethod comparison, Qids, Güvenilirlik, Follow up, Psychological rating scale, Reliability, Depressive symptomatology qids-c-16, Geçerlilik, Disease classification, Screening scale, Clinical neurology, Quick inventory of depressive symptomatology scale, Female, Tarama ölçeği, Rating Scales, Involutional Depression, Patient Health Questionnaire, Prediction, Psychometry, Self-report, Controlled study, Instrument validation, Human, Self report
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the validity and reliability of 16-item self-report version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) scale in comparison with BDI-II-Turkish (BDI-II-T) in a young sample of Turkish university students. Methods: A slightly modified version of the QIDS-SR16-Turkish (QIDS-SR16-T) available at www.ids-qids.org, along with the BDI-II-T, was administered to 628 young Turkish university students who attended the Family Health Center in Uludag University Campus between February and April 2010. Descriptive analyses, Student's t-test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and confirmatory factor analyses were used in the study. Results: The mean age of the participants was 21.1 +/- 2.16 (SD) years; 67.8% were female and 32.2% were male. Cronbach's a coefficient for internal consistency of the QIDS-SR16-T was found to be 0.769. The mean item-total correlation was 0.45, ranging from 0.29 to 0.71. The correlation between the BDI-II-T and QIDS-SR16-T was 0.72. ROC curve analysis suggested 9 as the optimal cut-off for a clinical depression level for the QIDS-SR16-T. Conclusion: We observed that the QIDS-SR16-T demonstrated good psychometric properties in a sample of young Turkish students and has convergent validity with the BDI-II-T, a widely used scale for depression. It is essential to diagnose reliably the major depressive disorder and to follow up the patients by valid screening instruments in primary care setting. The internal consistencies of the QIDS determined in studies from the United States were greater than our Cronbach's alpha coefficient, but there was no statistically significant difference between them (z=0.55, p>0.05). The QIDS-SR16-T can be reliably used in primary care settings. Genç Türk üniversite öğrencileri arasında Hızlı Depresif Belirti Envanteri’nin (HDBE) 16 maddelik Özbildirim Formu‘nun, Beck Depresyon Envanteri-II (BDE-II) ile karşılaştırılarak geçerlilik ve güvenilirliğinin saptanması. Yön tem ler: www.ids-qids.org’tan ulaşılabilecek Hızlı Depresif Belirti Envanteri-Özbildirim Formu’nun (HDBE16-ÖF) hafifçe değiştirilmiş olan versiyonu, BDE-II ile beraber Uludağ Üniversitesi Kampüsü içinde yer alan Aile Sağlığı Merkezine ayaktan başvuran 628 genç Türk üniversite öğrencisine Şubat 2010 ve Nisan 2010 tarihleri arasında uygulandı. Betimleyici istatistik, student t testi, ROC analizi ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri çalışmada kullanılmıştır. Bul gu lar: Ortalama yaş 21,1±2,16 (SD) olarak saptandı. Örneklemin %67,8’i kadın, %32,2’si erkek idi. İç tutarlılık α-Cronbach katsayısı 0,769 olarak saptandı. Ortalama madde-toplam madde korelasyonu 0,45 (0,29-0,71) olarak bulunmuştur. ROC analizine göre, HDBE16-ÖF için klinik depresyon açısından 9 puan sınır değer olarak saptanmıştır. So nuç: HDBE16-ÖF ile çok sık kullanılan bir depresyon ölçeği olan BDE-II, iyi psikometrik uyum geçerliliği göstermiştir. 1. Basamakta majör depresif epizodu güvenle teşhis etmek ve hastalığı, geçerliliği kanıtlanmış araçlarla takip etmek önemlidir. Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nde HDBE ile ilgili çalışmalarda elde edilen iç tutarlılık katsayısı α Cronbach bizim çalışmamızdan daha yüksek bulunsa da, aralarında istatiksel olarak bir farklılık yoktur (z=0,55, p>0,05). HDBE16-ÖF 1.basamakta güvenle kullanılabilecek bir ölçektir.

Published
2012

6. Türk ve Amerikalı üniversite öğrencilerinde hızlı depresif belirti envanteri-özbildirim formu’nun (HDBE16-ÖF) karşılaştırmalı olarak geçerlik ve güvenirliği

Author

Haluk Mergen, Ira H. Bernstein, Vedide Tavli, Şeref Tan, Kurtuluş Öngel, Talat Tavli, Mergen, H, Bernstein, IH, Tavli, V, Ongel, K, Tavli, T, Tan, S, Yeditepe Üniversitesi, Mergen, H., Bernstein, I.H., Tavli, V., Ongel, K., Tavli, T., Tan, S., Uludağ Üniversitesi/Eğitim Fakültesi/Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü., Uludağ Üniversitesi/Aile Sağlığı Merkezi., Tan, Şeref, Mergen, Haluk, A-1204-2018, Bernsteın, Ira H., Tavlı, Vedide, Öngel, Kurtuluş, and Tavlı, Talat

Subjects
Male, Scoring system, validity, College student, Turkish, Major depressive episode, Validity, Turkey (republic), Depressive symptomatology, 0302 clinical medicine, Pedagogy, Prevalence, Major depression, Pharmacology (medical), Reliability (statistics), Quick inventory, Criterion, Psychiatry, Depression, Number, Outpatient, Reliability, Psychiatry and Mental health, Factorial analysis, language, Common factors, Female, medicine.symptom, Psychology, Psychometry, Clinical psychology, Human, Adult, Bipolar disorder, Sample (statistics), Major clinical study, Rating scale, Article, Clinician, 03 medical and health sciences, Quick inventory of depressive symptomatology SR16, medicine, Psychometric evaluation, Beck depression inventory, reliability, Farmakoloji ve Eczacılık, Pharmacology & pharmacy, screening scale, language.human_language, Depressive symptomatology qids-c-16, 030227 psychiatry, Internal consistency, Screening scale, Self-report versions, Comparative study, Rating Scales, Involutional Depression, Patient Health Questionnaire, 030217 neurology & neurosurgery, Self report
Abstract

Amaç: Öğrenci ağırlıklı Türk örneklemine uygulanan Türkçe’ye çevrilmiş 16 maddelik Hızlı Depresif Belirti Envanteri-Özbildirim Formu’nun (HDBE16-ÖF): a) Amerikalı üniversite öğrencilerine uygulanan orijinal Amerikan versiyonu (QIDS-SR_{16}-US) ve b) aynı Türk öğrenci örnekleminde Beck Depresyon Envanteri-II (BDI-II) ile karşılaştırılarak geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin ortaya konması amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmamız Türkiye ve Amerika Birleşik Devletleri arasında yapılan bir kültürlerarası geçerlilik çalışmasıdır. Metod: Uludağ Üniversitesi yerleşkesi Aile Sağlığı Merkezi’ne ayaktan başvuran öğrenci ağırlıklı 626 hastaya; www.ids-qids.org adresinden ulaşılabilen ve kısmen modifiye edilerek Türkçe’ye çevrilen HDBE_{16}-ÖF ve BDI-II testleri uygulandı. Ayrıca Güneybatı Teksas Üniversitesi’nde HDBE16-ÖF envanterinin İngilizce orijinal versiyonu olan QIDS-SR_{16}-US 584 öğrenciye uygulanmıştır. Betimleyici istatistik, klasik açıklayıcı faktör analizi ve madde tepki kuramı analizleri, SAS ve MPlus istatistik programları ile yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Türk deneklerin ortalama yaşı 21,12,16 (standart sapma) olup %67,8’i kadındı. Türk öğrencilerin aile içi depresyon öyküsü: annede %29, babada %8, kardeşte %14, kendisinde %16 ve akrabada %5 olarak bulundu. Amerikalı deneklerden 225 olguda hiç yaş belirtilmemiş haldeyken ortalama yaş 20.03,5 (standart sapma) ve tüm deneklerin %63,6’sı kadın olarak saptandı. HDBE_{16}-ÖF’nın madde ortalaması 6,944,85 (standart sapma) bulundu. HDBE_{16}-ÖF’ün iç tutarlılık katsayısı (Cronbach ?) 0,78 idi ve ortalama madde-toplam korrelasyon katayısı 0,47 (0,33- 0,61) bulundu. QIDS-SR_{16}-US’nin kaşılaştırılabilir madde ortalaması 6,093,76, Cronbach ? 0,74, madde-toplam korrelasyon katsayısı 0,43 (0,24-0,54) olarak bulundu. Hem HDBE_{16}-ÖF hem de QIDS-SR_{16}-US tek boyutlu iken BDIII tek boyutlu olarak bulunmadı. HDBE_{16}’ün ve QIDS-SR_{16}-US’un madde-total korelasyon ortalaması birbirine benzerdi. BDI-II ile HDBE_{16}-ÖF arasındaki korelasyon katsayısı 0.72 bulundu, bu değer disattenüe edildiğinde 0.90’a çıkmaktaydı. Çoklu grup doğrulayıcı faktör analizi HDBE_{16}-ÖF ve QIDS-SR_{16}-US’un aynı faktör yüküne sahip olduğu farklı değişik eşiklerinin olduğunu ortaya çıkarmıştır. Bu durum depresyon düzeyinde grup farklılıklarını ortaya koymaktadır. Türk deneklerin, Amerikalı deneklerden farklı olarak daha fazla depresyon geçirdikleri söylenebilir. Ayrıca HDBE_{16}-ÖF ve BDI-II’nın skorları birbirlerine eşitlenmiştir. Tartışma: HDBE_{16}-ÖF’ün, hem Türkiye hem de Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nde depresyon tanısı için çok sık kullanılan BDI-II testi gibi iyi psikometrik özellikleri ve yapısal geçerliliği olduğu saptanmıştır. Pek çok ortamda HDBE_{16}-ÖF’ün kullanılmasını önermekteyiz. Objective: To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, selfreported version, in a Turkish student sample (QIDS-SR_{16}-T) by comparing it to (a) the American version (QIDS-SR_{16}-US) and (b) the Turkish version of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II-T). Materials and Methods: Slightly modified versions of the QIDS-SR_{16}-T, and the BDI-II-T were administered to 626 outpatients at the Uludağ University campus-based family health center. The QIDS-SR_{16}-US was administered to 584 respondents at an American university. SAS and MPlus were used to provide descriptive statistics, classical exploratory factor analysis, and item response theory analyses (in the form of a multiple group confirmatory factor analysis). Results: The internal consistency (Cronbach α) of the QIDS-SR_{16}-T was 0.77. Both QIDS-SR_{16} versions were unidimensional, but the BDI-II-T was not. The mean QIDS-SR_{16}-T and QIDS-SR_{16}-US item-total correlations were similar. The correlation between the QIDS-SR_{16}-T and BDIII- T was 0.72 (.90 when disattenuated). Multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis suggested that the QIDS-SR_{16}-T and QIDS-SR16-US had the same factor loadings but different intercepts. This reflects group differences in level of depression, perhaps because the Turkish respondents, unlike their US counterparts, were seen in a medical context where illness-related depression is more prevalent. Scores on the QIDS-SR_{16}-T and the BDI-II-T were also equated. Discussion: The QIDS-SR_{16}-T has good psychometric properties and convergent validity with the BDI-II-T. Its use is recommended when a self-reported instrument is appropriate.

Published
2011

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results