1. RNA marker modifications reveal the necessity for rigorous preparation protocols to avoid artifacts in epitranscriptomic analysis
- Author
-
Johanna E Plehn, Mark Helm, Larissa Bessler, Kristina Friedland, Marko Jörg, Cansu Cirzi, Francesca Tuorto, Florian Richter, and Jasmin Hertler
- Subjects
Small RNA ,Programmed cell death ,RNA ,Biology ,Ribosomal RNA ,In vitro ,Cell biology ,Cortex (botany) ,Mice ,RNA, Transfer ,RNA, Ribosomal ,Transfer RNA ,Genetics ,Animals ,RNA Processing, Post-Transcriptional ,Artifacts ,Intracellular - Abstract
The accurate definition of an epitranscriptome is endangered by artefacts resulting from RNA degradation after cell death, a ubiquitous yet little investigated process. By tracing RNA marker modifications through tissue preparation protocols, we identified a major blind spot from daily lab routine, that has massive impact on modification analysis in small RNAs. In particular, m6,6A and Am as co-varying rRNA marker modifications, appeared in small RNA fractions following rRNA degradation in vitro and in cellulo. Analysing mouse tissue at different time points post mortem, we tracked the progress of intracellular RNA degradation after cell death, and found it reflected in RNA modification patterns. Differences were dramatic between liver, where RNA degradation commenced immediately after death, and brain, yielding essentially undamaged RNA. RNA integrity correlated with low amounts of co-varying rRNA markers. Thus validated RNA preparations featured differentially modified tRNA populations whose information content allowed a distinction even among the related brain tissues cortex, cerebellum and hippocampus. Inversely, advanced cell death correlated with high rRNA marker content, and correspondingly little with the naïve state of living tissue. Therefore, unless RNA and tissue preparations are executed with utmost care, interpretation of modification patterns in tRNA and small RNA are prone to artefacts.
- Published
- 2021